FN Clarivate Analytics Web of Science VR 1.0 PT C AU Yang, YY Li, BZ Wang, JM Yuan, CS Liu, F Hu, G Lu, GM Lin, R AF Yang, Yingyu Li, Bingze Wang, Jiamei Yuan, Changsen Liu, Feng Hu, Gang Lu, Guangming Lin, Rui BE Ma, ZL Fang, ZG Ke, JF TI Analysis and Countermeasure Research about Sensitive Information of Complex Cyber Psychology of Cross-border Multi-ethnic Language SO PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER ENGINEERING, INFORMATION SCIENCE & APPLICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICCIA 2016) SE ACSR-Advances in Comptuer Science Research LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Cyber Psychology; network language violence; Content analysis AB In this paper, we consider all aspects of sensitive information of cyber psychology of cross-border multi-ethnic language, and use the method of combining the theoretical research and empirical research to carry out the analysis and countermeasure research about sensitive information of complex cyber psychology of cross-border multi-ethnic language in Yunnan province. It closely combined with the practical application and social needs and it also provide technical support and method guidance for sensitive information mining of complex cyber psychology of cross-border ethnic language. Due to China as a multi-ethnic multilingual country, so the development value, the demonstration value and the theory value of this topic is worth attention. C1 [Yang, Yingyu] Univ Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England. [Wang, Jiamei; Yuan, Changsen; Liu, Feng; Hu, Gang; Lu, Guangming; Lin, Rui] Yunnan MinZu Univ, Sch Elect Informat Engn, Kunming 650500, Peoples R China. [Yang, Yingyu; Li, Bingze; Wang, Jiamei; Yuan, Changsen; Liu, Feng; Hu, Gang; Lu, Guangming; Lin, Rui] Yunnan Prov Coll, Minor Language Informat Proc Engn Res Ctr, Kunming 650500, Peoples R China. C3 University of Bath; Yunnan Minzu University RP Li, BZ (corresponding author), Yunnan Prov Coll, Minor Language Informat Proc Engn Res Ctr, Kunming 650500, Peoples R China. EM 1575763065@qq.com CR CHEN Shun-qiang, 2009, J SW U NATL NATURAL, V35, P913 Cobos C, 2014, INFORM SCIENCES, V281, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2014.05.047 Fang Ziwen, 2008, THESIS, P5 FENG Hao, 2010, J COMPUTER APPL, VA01, P306 FENG Hao, 2011, MODERN COMPUTER, V9, P11 Fu X F, 2002, THESIS Jian-jun ZHU, 2003, J HUZHOU TEACHERS CO, V25, P22 Li Jinfa, 2008, J YUNNAN NATIONALITI, V14 Li XunShan, 2011, ELECT SCI TECHNOLOGY, V24, P97 Lu Jixing, 2003, J AGR U HEBEI, V26, P290 Pu Zhangkai, 2005, DIANNAN YIWEN ZIDIAN ShaMaLayi, 2003, J SW U NATL NATURAL, V29, P1 Wang Jiamei, 2006, YI ANCIENT DIGITAL R, V07, P149 Wang Sili, 2010, NW U NATIONALITIES WU Lihui, 2009, COMPUTER ENG, V31, P123 Yi character set of Yunnan,, 2001, YI CHARACTER SET YUN NR 16 TC 0 Z9 0 PU ATLANTIS PRESS PI PARIS PA 29 AVENUE LAVMIERE, PARIS, 75019, FRANCE PY 2016 VL 56 BP 81 EP 87 WC Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Computer Science, Theory & Methods; Engineering, Multidisciplinary SC Computer Science; Engineering ER PT J AU Giansanti, D Timperi, G Gulino, RA AF Giansanti, Daniele Timperi, Giulia Gulino, Rosario A. TI Cyber-psychology and e-health: A survey to investigate users & professionals opinion SO LIFE SPAN AND DISABILITY LA English DT Article; Proceedings Paper C1 [Giansanti, Daniele] Italian Natl Inst Hlth, Natl Ctr Innovat Technol Publ Hlth ISS TISP, Rome, Italy. [Timperi, Giulia; Gulino, Rosario A.] Tor Vergata Univ, Rome, Italy. C3 Istituto Superiore di Sanita (ISS); University of Rome Tor Vergata RP Giansanti, D (corresponding author), Italian Natl Inst Hlth, Natl Ctr Innovat Technol Publ Hlth ISS TISP, Rome, Italy. EM gianslele@gmail.com CR Giansanti D., 2019, RAPPORTI ISTISAN 191 NR 1 TC 0 Z9 0 PU CITTA APERTA EDIZIONI SRL PI TROINA EN PA VIA NAZIONALE, 83, TROINA EN, 94018, ITALY PY 2020 VL 23 IS 1 SU S BP 111 EP 113 WC Respiratory System SC Respiratory System ER PT C AU Ahuja, V Alavi, S AF Ahuja, Vanshika Alavi, Shirin BE Ahuja, V Shi, Y Khazanchi, D Abidi, N Tian, Y Berg, D Tien, JM TI Cyber psychology and cyber behaviour of adolescents-the need of the contemporary era SO 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT, ITQM 2017 SE Procedia Computer Science LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Cyberpsychology; Social networks; Netnography; Clustering ID INTERNET ADDICTION; ONLINE COMMUNITIES AB Cyber psychology is also addressed as Internet psychology or web psychology. In the modern era it is gaining momentum as a field, as more and more people are embracing the virtual world. Changing lifestyles and a constant digital presence is impacting the minds of millions of youngsters as the average amount of time spent on the internet increases rapidly. Youngsters are spending a lot of time online-chatting with their friends through social networks, playing online games with their peers, and shopping products online. As the individual need for recognition and self actualisation grows, youngsters are trying to form and establish identities online. This hunger for appreciation, coupled with long hours spent online are paving way for several problems regarding the health and well being of the adolescents. This manuscript proposes a research framework which will enable classification of adolescents as Expressive, Impatient, Connected Impersonal, and Knowledgeable, based on their social media presence. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. C1 [Ahuja, Vanshika] Amity Inst Behav & Allied Sci, Noida 201301, UP, India. [Alavi, Shirin] Jaypee Inst Informat Technol, Sect 62, Noida 201309, UP, India. C3 Jaypee Institute of Information Technology (JIIT) RP Alavi, S (corresponding author), Jaypee Inst Informat Technol, Sect 62, Noida 201309, UP, India. EM shirin.alavi@jiit.ac.in CR Amichai-Hamburger Y, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P125, DOI 10.1089/109493102753770507 Assuncao R., 2017, COMPUTERS HUMAN BEHA Caru A, 2008, QUAL MARK RES, V11, P166, DOI 10.1108/13522750810864422 Elliott R., 2003, QUALITATIVE MARKET R, V6, P215, DOI DOI 10.1108/13522750310495300 Kozinets RV, 2010, J MARKETING, V74, P71, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.74.2.71 Kozinets RV, 2002, J MARKETING RES, V39, P61, DOI 10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935 McKenna KYA, 2002, J SOC ISSUES, V58, P9, DOI 10.1111/1540-4560.00246 Shaw M, 2008, CNS DRUGS, V22, P353, DOI 10.2165/00023210-200822050-00001 Trapnell PD, 1999, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V76, P284, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.284 Tsai CC, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P649, DOI 10.1089/109493103322725432 NR 10 TC 4 Z9 4 PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV PI AMSTERDAM PA SARA BURGERHARTSTRAAT 25, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS PY 2017 VL 122 BP 671 EP 676 DI 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.422 WC Business; Information Science & Library Science; Management; Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods SC Business & Economics; Information Science & Library Science; Mathematical Methods In Social Sciences ER PT J AU Watson, BR AF Watson, Brendan R. TI "A window into shock, pain, and attempted recovery": A decade of blogging as a coping strategy in New Orleans SO NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY LA English DT Article DE Blogging; citizen journalism; community stress; coping; Hurricane Katrina; New Orleans; social media ID SELF AB Interviews with bloggers examine the ongoing use of blogs to cope with the persistent community stress New Orleans has experienced post-Hurricane Katrina. Previously, the field of media studies has overlooked blogs' coping role. Cyber psychology has explored blogs' role in individual and emotional coping, but not task-oriented efforts to ameliorate sources of community stress. Among other insights, the unique intersection of media studies and cyber psychology explored in this study illuminates the double-edged sword that is the imagined audience. While a positive source of social support, efforts to attract and maintain an audience can impose the perceived pressure to keep face and maintain an angry blogging persona beyond its useful cathartic value. Combining perspectives from cyber psychology and media studies, this study contributes a more multifaceted understanding of how residents may use social media to cope with individual and community stress than has been explored in previous research. C1 [Watson, Brendan R.] Michigan State Univ, Sch Journalism, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA. C3 Michigan State University RP Watson, BR (corresponding author), Michigan State Univ, Sch Journalism, Coll Commun Arts & Sci, 404 Wilson Rd,Room 302, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA. EM brwatson@msu.edu CR Al-Ani B, 2010, CHI2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, P1069 [Anonymous], 2015, RIS TID 10 C FUT NEW BACHRACH KM, 1985, J HEALTH SOC BEHAV, V26, P127, DOI 10.2307/2136602 Baker JR, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P379, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0130 Baker JR, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P747, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0053 Boniel-Nissim M, 2013, PSYCHOL SERV, V10, P333, DOI 10.1037/a0026664 Bullingham L, 2013, J INF SCI, V39, P101, DOI 10.1177/0165551512470051 Carlson Matt, 2015, BOUNDARIES JOURNALIS, P1 Curry A, 2008, SOC SCI MED, V67, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.007 Dahlgren Peter, 2001, MEDIATED POLITICS CO, P33 Friedland L. A., 2009, ENCY JOURNALISM, P297 Gee G, 2004, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V113, pA18 Goffman E., 1956, PRESENTATION SELF EV Heiman T, 2005, COLL STUDENT J, V39, P72 Holton AE, 2013, JOURNAL PRACT, V7, P720, DOI 10.1080/17512786.2013.766062 Hoyt T., 2008, ELECT J APPL PSYCHOL, V4, P56, DOI DOI 10.7790/EJAP.V4I2.106 Ko HC, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P75, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0163 Litt E, 2012, J BROADCAST ELECTRON, V56, P330, DOI 10.1080/08838151.2012.705195 Mark Gloria, 2012, CSCW12 P ACM 2012 C, P37 Martin RC, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P119, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0130 Reckdahl K, 2015, POLITICO MAGAZI 0831 Robinson S, 2009, NEW MEDIA SOC, V11, P795, DOI 10.1177/1461444809105353 Schmitz Weiss, 2008, WOMEN MEN NEWS, P129 Sicker D, 2010, ACM BCS VIS COMP SCI Smyth J, 2003, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V59, P227, DOI 10.1002/jclp.10144 Smyth J, 2001, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V20, P161, DOI 10.1521/jscp.20.2.161.22266 Thompson C, 2014, WIRED, V22, P50 US Census Bureau, 2013, 2009 2013 AM COMM SU Vis F., 2009, CITIZEN JOURNALISM G, P65 Weiss R., 1994, LEARNING STRANGERS A Woldoff RA, 2002, SOC FORCES, V81, P87, DOI 10.1353/sof.2002.0065 NR 31 TC 8 Z9 8 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD PI LONDON PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND PD MAR PY 2018 VL 20 IS 3 BP 1068 EP 1084 DI 10.1177/1461444816681523 WC Communication SC Communication ER PT J AU Huber, HP AF Huber, HP TI Clinical cyber psychology: The application of virtual realities in psychological diagnosis and treatment SO ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE LA German DT Article DE clinical cyber psychology; virtual realities; psychological assessment; psychological treatment; rehabilitation ID EXPOSURE THERAPY; PEDIATRIC PAIN; HEALTH-CARE; FOLLOW-UP; COMPUTER; ENVIRONMENTS; INTERNET; ANXIETY; FEAR; SYSTEM AB Background and objective: A steadily increasing number of publications indicate the emergence of a new field in clinical psychology that may be called "clinical cyber psychology". An attempt is made to give a survey of recent results of applying "virtual realities" (VR) to psychological assessment and treatment. Method: The present study distinguishes between three approaches: a) E-therapy, b) VR-therapy, and c) VR-teletherapy. By and large, these distinction categories (E, VR, and VR-tele) apply also to psychological assessment, counseling, and rehabilitation. Results and conclusions: Computer-generated 3 D virtual realities provide a high level of control of both stimulus presentation and interaction between patients and the virtual environment. It is hoped that the application of virtual reality technologies may contribute to essential improvements in the field of psychological assessment and treatment. C1 Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Psychol, A-8010 Graz, Austria. C3 University of Graz RP Huber, HP (corresponding author), Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Psychol, Univ Pl 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria. EM helmuth.huber@uni-graz.at CR Alcaniz M, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P355, DOI 10.1089/109493103322278727 Alcaniz M, 2000, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V3, P433, DOI 10.1089/10949310050078896 Alessi NE, 2000, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V3, P321, DOI 10.1089/10949310050078751 *AM PSYCH ASS, 1992, AM PSYCHOL, V47, P1597, DOI DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.47.12.1597 *AM PSYCH ASS, 2000, MON PSYCH, V31 Anderson P, 2004, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V60, P253, DOI 10.1002/jclp.10262 BANDURA A, 1974, AM PSYCHOL, V29, P859, DOI 10.1037/h0037514 Bandura A, 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO, V1 Baumann S, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P259, DOI 10.1089/109493103322011542 BENTE G, 2002, VIRTUELLE REALITATEN, P1 BIOCCA F, 1992, J COMMUN, V42, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00810.x Biocca F., 1995, COMMUNICATION AGE VI, V15, P32 BIRK L, 1973, BIOFEEDBACK BEHAV ME, P1 Bischof WF, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P487, DOI 10.1089/109493103769710514 Brooks BM, 2002, DISABIL REHABIL, V24, P622, DOI 10.1080/09638280110111397 CASTELNUOVO G, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY MIND, P229 Cavanagh K, 2004, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V60, P239, DOI 10.1002/jclp.10261 Clark L.A., 1999, V2, P399 COSTA PT, 1992, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V13, P653, DOI 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I Costa RMEM, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P423, DOI 10.1089/109493102761022841 Davidson J, 2003, SOCIOL HEALTH ILL, V25, P644, DOI 10.1111/1467-9566.00363 De Leo G, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P267, DOI 10.1089/109493103322011551 Difede J, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P529, DOI 10.1089/109493102321018169 Engel B.T., 1972, HDB PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, P571 FOA EB, 1993, STRUCTURE EMOTION PS, P111 Fogel J, 2002, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V21, P398, DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.21.4.398 Fraser J, 2001, BEHAV CHANGE, V18, P213, DOI 10.1375/bech.18.4.213 Freeman D, 2003, J NERV MENT DIS, V191, P509, DOI 10.1097/01.nmd.0000082212.83842.fe Freeman D, 2002, BRIT J CLIN PSYCHOL, V41, P331, DOI 10.1348/014466502760387461 Gaggioli A, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P117, DOI 10.1089/109493103321640301 Galimberti C, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P229, DOI 10.1089/109493103322011506 Gamberini L, 2003, ERGONOMICS, V46, P842, DOI 10.1080/0014013031000111266 Garcia-Palacios A, 2002, BEHAV RES THER, V40, P983, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00068-7 Gershon J, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P657, DOI 10.1089/109493103322725450 Gilroy LJ, 2003, BEHAV THER, V34, P65, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7894(03)80022-9 Gould MS, 2002, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V41, P1182, DOI 10.1097/00004583-200210000-00007 Harris SR, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P543, DOI 10.1089/109493102321018187 Hoffman HG, 2003, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V16, P283, DOI 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1602_08 Hoffman HG, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P127, DOI 10.1089/109493103321640310 Holden G, 1999, RES SOCIAL WORK PRAC, V9, P365, DOI 10.1177/104973159900900310 Holden G, 2003, RES SOCIAL WORK PRAC, V13, P693, DOI 10.1177/1049731503254107 Holden G, 2002, SOC WORK HEALTH CARE, V36, P21, DOI 10.1300/J010v36n02_02 Holden G., 2000, Journal of Technology in Human Services, V17, P27, DOI 10.1300/J017v17n01_03 Jordan PatrickW., 1998, INTRO USABILITY Kahana MJ, 1999, NATURE, V399, P781, DOI 10.1038/21645 KRAMER NC, 2002, VIRTUELLE REALITATEN, P202 Krijn M, 2004, BEHAV RES THER, V42, P229, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00139-6 LANG PJ, 1979, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V16, P495, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01511.x Larkin M, 2000, Lancet, V355, P1834, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)73097-X LARNIER J, 1992, J COMMUN, V42, P150 Lee JH, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P275, DOI 10.1089/109493103322011560 Maltby N, 2002, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V70, P1112, DOI 10.1037//0022-006X.70.5.1112 Marwitz M, 1998, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V35, P1 McComas J, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P185, DOI 10.1089/109493102760147150 Moore K, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P197, DOI 10.1089/109493102760147178 Mraz R, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P359, DOI 10.1089/109493103322278736 Muhlberger A, 2003, PSYCHOTHER RES, V13, P323, DOI 10.1093/ptr/kpg030 Muhlberger A, 2001, BEHAV RES THER, V39, P1033, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00076-0 ONGHENA P, 1994, BEHAV RES THER, V32, P783, DOI 10.1016/0005-7967(94)90036-1 PAECHTER M, 2000, MEDIENPSYCHOLOGIE, V12, P242 Page S, 2003, HEALTH CARE MANAGE R, V28, P79, DOI 10.1097/00004010-200301000-00009 PEPINA C, 2003, EUROPEAN EATING DISO, V11, P261 PETERSEN A, 2002, VIRTUELLE REALITATEN, P228 Plante TG, 2003, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V19, P495, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00074-2 RABASCA L, 2000, MONITOR PSYCHOL, V31, P28 Read SJ, 2002, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V6, P357, DOI 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_10 Reid D, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P559, DOI 10.1089/109493102321018204 Repperger DW, 2003, PERCEPT MOTOR SKILL, V97, P820, DOI 10.2466/PMS.97.7.820-832 Riva G, 1997, ST HEAL T, V44, P71 Riva G, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P219, DOI 10.1089/109493102760147213 Riva G, 1997, ST HEAL T, V44, P95 RIZZO AA, TELEMED J E HLTH RIZZO AA, 2002, VIRTURAL ENV ASSESSM Robillard G, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P467, DOI 10.1089/109493103769710497 Rose FD, 2001, PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AUG, V10, P345, DOI 10.1162/1054746011470208 Rothbaum BO, 2000, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V68, P1020, DOI 10.1037/0022-006X.68.6.1020 Schneider SM, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P301, DOI 10.1089/109493103322011605 Simpson G, 2003, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V35, P787, DOI 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00081-7 Slater M., 1993, PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AUG, V2, P221, DOI [10.1162/pres.1993.2.3.221, DOI 10.1162/PRES.1993.2.3.221] STEUER J, 1992, J COMMUN, V42, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x Tate DF, 2004, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V60, P209, DOI 10.1002/jclp.10247 Taylor H., 2001, HLTH CARE NEWS, V1, P1 Vincelli F., 2002, EXPERT REV NEUROTHER, V2, P89 Wald J, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P459, DOI 10.1089/109493103769710488 Walshe DG, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P329, DOI 10.1089/109493103322011641 Weiss PL, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P335, DOI 10.1089/109493103322011650 Wiederhold BK, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P441, DOI 10.1089/109493103322278844 Wiggins JS, 1996, 5 FACTOR MODEL PERSO Winzelberg AJ, 2000, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V68, P346, DOI 10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.346 2003, PSYCHOL OSTERREICH NR 90 TC 0 Z9 0 PU HOGREFE & HUBER PUBLISHERS PI GOTTINGEN PA MERKELSTR 3, D-37085 GOTTINGEN, GERMANY PY 2006 VL 35 IS 1 BP 39 EP 48 DI 10.1026/1616-3443.35.1.39 WC Psychology, Clinical SC Psychology ER PT C AU Hakim, A Hammad, S AF Hakim, Arhum Hammad, Sadaf BE Biele, C Kacprzyk, J Kopec, W Owsinski, JW Romanowski, A Sikorski, M TI Use of Virtual Reality in Psychology SO DIGITAL INTERACTION AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, MIDI 2021 SE Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Immersive technology; Virtual Reality; Cyberpsychology; Psychology ID EXPOSURE THERAPY; SOCIAL-SKILLS; BODY-IMAGE; ANXIETY; SCHIZOPHRENIA; ADOLESCENTS; TECHNOLOGY; DISORDERS; SYSTEM AB The field of psychology is advancing with incorporation of immersive technologies and Virtual Environments (VE) in research, treatment, assessment and learning etc. Virtual Reality (VR) is one of the focused sub-domains of immersive technologies that is being used vastly in psychology. This also comes under the paradigm of cyberpsychology. The advancements reported in this area bring the need to understand the benefits provided by virtual reality with respect to human interaction and behavior etc. The published literature available discusses the development and evolution of cyber psychology specifically with respect to virtual reality. To the best of our knowledge the latest developments due to virtual reality in various sub fields of psychology have not been collectively documented so far. This paper provides highlights of the developments and transformations linked with the usage of virtual reality with recommendations about future studies and provides the reader a broader and informed view of this cross-disciplinary area. Moreover, the paper also provides limitations that exist, and considerations required while using VR for a specific treatment or experimentation. C1 [Hakim, Arhum] Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, Sch Social Sci & Humanities, Islamabad, Pakistan. [Hammad, Sadaf] Video Surveillance Lab PNEC NUST, Karachi, Pakistan. C3 National University of Sciences & Technology - Pakistan RP Hakim, A (corresponding author), Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, Sch Social Sci & Humanities, Islamabad, Pakistan. EM arhumhakim@gmail.com CR American Psychiatric Association, 2022, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, V5th ed Araiza-Alba P., 2020, INT J VIRTUAL REAL, V20, P1 Asadzadeh Afsoon, 2021, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, V24, DOI 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100562 Bailey B, 2022, REV J AUTISM DEV DIS, V9, P160, DOI 10.1007/s40489-020-00230-x Carlo G, 2002, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V31, P31, DOI 10.1023/A:1014033032440 Chan E, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0200987 Cheng YF, 2015, FOCUS AUTISM DEV DIS, V30, P222, DOI 10.1177/1088357615583473 Cheong Moon Ju, 2020, [The Korean Society of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, 동의신경정신과학회지], V31, P279, DOI 10.7231/jon.2020.31.4.279 Choi JS, 2011, PSYCHIAT INVEST, V8, P155, DOI 10.4306/pi.2011.8.2.155 Code Jillianne, 2013, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, V24, P371 Difede J, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P529, DOI 10.1089/109493102321018169 Emmelkamp PMG, 2002, BEHAV RES THER, V40, P509, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00023-7 Farley ORL, 2020, J HUM SPORT EXERC, V15, P535, DOI 10.14198/jhse.2020.153.06 Fernandez-Sotos P, 2020, EUR J PSYCHIAT, V34, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ejpsy.2019.12.003 Ferrer-Garcia M, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P60, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2017.0675 Freeman D, 2017, PSYCHOL MED, V47, P2393, DOI 10.1017/S003329171700040X Gandhi RD., 2018, INT RES J ENG TECHNO, V5, P482 Golomb MR, 2010, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V91, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.153 Hamilton D, 2021, J COMPUT EDUC, V8, P1, DOI 10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2 Ip HHS, 2018, COMPUT EDUC, V117, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.010 Jeong DC, 2017, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V10498, P170, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-67401-8_19 Li W., 2009, TRADIT DISCOV, V21, P107, DOI DOI 10.3233/TAD-2009-0277 Liu T., 2020, INT C COMPUTER INFOR Liu T., 2020, 2020 INT C COMPUTER Lyons EJ, 2015, GAMES HEALTH J, V4, P12, DOI 10.1089/g4h.2014.0072 Makransky G, 2021, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V113, P719, DOI 10.1037/edu0000473 Maples-Keller JL, 2017, HARVARD REV PSYCHIAT, V25, P103, DOI 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000138 Marco JH, 2013, PSYCHIAT RES, V209, P619, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.02.023 Martin S, 2019, VIRTUAL REALITY MIGH Neumann DL, 2018, VIRTUAL REAL-LONDON, V22, P183, DOI 10.1007/s10055-017-0320-5 Opris D, 2012, DEPRESS ANXIETY, V29, P85, DOI 10.1002/da.20910 Parish-Morris J, 2018, ANN REV CYBERTHERAPY, V16, P50 Parong J, 2018, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V110, P785, DOI 10.1037/edu0000241 Pericot-Valverde I, 2019, J SUBST ABUSE TREAT, V96, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.10.003 Pitti CT, 2008, ACTAS ESP PSIQUIATRI, V36, P94 Riva G, 2001, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V4, P511, DOI 10.1089/109493101750527079 Riva G., 2020, REFERENCE MODULE NEU Riva G, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P277, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2020.29183.gri Rizzo AA, 2006, CNS SPECTRUMS, V11, P35, DOI 10.1017/S1092852900024196 Rizzo AA, 2004, NEUROPSYCHOL REHABIL, V14, P207, DOI 10.1080/09602010343000183 Rizzo A, 2010, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1208, P114, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05755.x Roberts AC, 2019, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V31, P318, DOI 10.1037/pas0000663 Robillard G, 2010, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V154, P57, DOI 10.3233/978-1-60750-561-7-57 Rus-Calafell M, 2014, J BEHAV THER EXP PSY, V45, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.09.002 Sahin NT, 2018, J CLIN MED, V7, DOI 10.3390/jcm7080188 [郑霞 ZHENG Xia], 2010, [心理科学进展, Advances in Psychological Science], V18, P511 Segawa T, 2020, FRONT NEUROSCI-SWITZ, V13, DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.01409 Smith SA, 2019, PSYCHON B REV, V26, P1213, DOI 10.3758/s13423-019-01605-w Vasser M, 2015, P IEEE VIRT REAL ANN, P361, DOI 10.1109/VR.2015.7223445 Veling W, 2014, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V40, P1194, DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbu125 Viirre E, 2015, HUM FACTORS ERGON, P521 Wiederhold BK, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P414, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2014.0197 Wilson JAB, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P767, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0071 Yaremych HE, 2019, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103845 You SH, 2005, STROKE, V36, P1166, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000162715.43417.91 NR 55 TC 0 Z9 0 PU SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG PI CHAM PA GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND PY 2022 VL 440 BP 208 EP 217 DI 10.1007/978-3-031-11432-8_21 WC Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence SC Computer Science ER PT J AU Papadimitriou, F AF Papadimitriou, Fivos TI A nexus of Cyber-Geography and Cyber-Psychology: Topos/"Notopia" and identity in hacking SO COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR LA English DT Article DE Hacking; Cyber-Geography; Cyber-Psychology; Identity; Notopia; Cyber-Identity ID SELF AB This paper explores the Cyber-Psychological and Cyber-Geographic aspects of hacking and hacktivism. An examination of the literature related to hackers and hacking reveals a complex nexus of spatial (including cyber-spatial such as "Notopia") and psychological aspects of hacking, from which emerges a central question of how humans perceive and manipulate their cyber-identities. Concealing (real and cyber) identities is typical in hacking. With our progressive acculturation with identity-less and place-less modes of existence, our cyber-identities through time may be studied from within John Locke's criterion of "memory" and the spatial-geographical criterion of identity. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. C1 Hellen Open Univ, Athens 11475, Greece. C3 Hellenic Open University RP Papadimitriou, F (corresponding author), Hellen Open Univ, 13A Aedonon St, Athens 11475, Greece. EM geotopia@yahoo.fr CR Adam A., 2000, Ethics and Information Technology, V2, P37, DOI 10.1023/A:1010012313068 Bainbridge D., 1997, Computer Law and Security Report, V13, P352, DOI 10.1016/S0267-3649(97)80180-X Barrett, 2003, INFORM SECURITY TECH, V8, P56, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S1363-4127(03)00007-4 CHERNEY L, 1996, WIRED WOMEN GENDER N Claessens J, 2003, INTERNET RES, V13, P242, DOI 10.1108/10662240310488933 DANET B, 1998, CYBERSOCIETY 2 0 REV Erickson K, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V12, P1229, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00371.x Ermann M., 2004, INT FORUM PSYCHOANAL, V13, P275, DOI [10.1080/08037060410004737, DOI 10.1080/08037060410004737] FILIOL E, 2006, CYBER CRIMINALITE Furnell S. M., 2001, Information Management & Computer Security, V9, P93, DOI 10.1108/09685220110388872 Giddens A., 1991, MODERNITY SELF IDENT HANCOCK B, 2000, COMPUT SECUR, V19, P581 INMAN B, 2007, NEW PERSPECTIVES Q, V24, P14 Kaldor-Robinson J., 2002, OXFORD DEV STUDIES, V30, P177, DOI DOI 10.1080/13600810220138285 Kovacich GL, 1999, COMPUT SECUR, V18, P573, DOI 10.1016/S0167-4048(99)82003-3 Locke J., 1961, ESSAY CONCERNING HUM MACHLIS S, 1997, COMPUT SECUR, V16, P621 Maczewski M., 2002, CHILD YOUTH CARE FOR, V31, P111, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1015322602597] MILLS K, 2002, GLOBAL SOC, V16, P69, DOI DOI 10.1080/09537320120111915 Mitnick K., 2002, ART DECEPTION Nozick R., 1981, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS OLSON ET, 1997, HUMAN ANIMAL PERSONA PAPADIMITRIOU F, 2004, 7 INT C URB HIST ATH Papadimitriou F, 2002, MODELLING INDICATORS, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00052-3 PAPADIMITRIOU F, 2006, CITY, V10, P317 Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS REID T, 1941, ESSAYS INTELLECTUAL Roesler C, 2008, J ANAL PSYCHOL, V53, P421, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2008.00735.x Smith A. D., 2002, Information Management & Computer Security, V10, P178, DOI 10.1108/09685220210436976 STARKMAN D, 1998, COMPUT SECUR, V17, P154 THOMSEN D, 1995, NETWORK SECURITY, V3, P6 Walden I, 2004, EUROPEAN J CRIME CRI, V12, P321 Wales E, 2002, COMPUT FRAUD SECUR, P7, DOI 10.1016/S1361-3723(02)01210-1 WARK M, 2004, HACKER MANIFESTO Wynn E, 1997, INFORM SOC, V13, P297, DOI 10.1080/019722497129043 YAR M, 2005, HOWARD J, V44, P387, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2311.2005.00383.X NR 36 TC 7 Z9 7 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD NOV PY 2009 VL 25 IS 6 BP 1331 EP 1334 DI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.009 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Popov, LM Nasibullov, KI Ustin, PN AF Popov, L. M. Nasibullov, K. I. Ustin, P. N. TI PROBLEMS AND WAYS OF THEIR SOLUTION IN RUSSIAN PSYCHOLOGY SO PSIKHOLOGICHESKII ZHURNAL LA Russian DT Article DE future of psychology; forecasts; postmodernism; transhumanism; spirituality; security; cyber psychology; practical psychology AB The three problems in Russian psychology development in the next decade are presented. First the acceptance by psychologists of a new picture of the modern society in the stage of "modern - post-modern" with its cyber processes and danger of transhumanism. Second - search of methods of psychological resistance to by reorientation of values from destructive to constructive; the third - saving of originality of Russian psychology, enhancing its practical orientation and the creating of the methodology of practical psychology. C1 [Popov, L. M.; Nasibullov, K. I.; Ustin, P. N.] Inst Psychol & Educ Kazan, Psychol Sci, Dept Psychol Personal, M Mezhlauk 1, Kazan 420021, Russia. RP Popov, LM (corresponding author), Inst Psychol & Educ Kazan, Psychol Sci, Dept Psychol Personal, M Mezhlauk 1, Kazan 420021, Russia. EM Leonid.Popov@inbox.ru; rtkamil@bk.ru; pavust@mail.ru CR [Anonymous], 2015, SBORN STAT 5 MEZHD N Fukujama F., 2004, NASHE POSTCHELOVECHE Smit N., 2003, SOVREMENNYE SISTEMY Zhuravlev A. L, 2016, PSIHOLOGICHESKIJ ZH, V37, P55 NR 4 TC 1 Z9 1 PU MEZHDUNARODNAYA KNIGA PI MOSCOW PA 39 DIMITROVA UL., MOSCOW, 113095, RUSSIA PD JUL-AUG PY 2017 VL 38 IS 4 BP 115 EP 118 DI 10.7868/S0205959217040109 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Vilenskaya, GA AF Vilenskaya, G. A. TI INVESTIGATIONS IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF INTERNET IN "PSYHOLOGICHESKII ZHURNAL": SOME FINDINGS AND PERSPECTIVES SO PSIKHOLOGICHESKII ZHURNAL LA Russian DT Article DE Internet; Internet addiction; psychological characteristics of internet users; cyber psychology; psychology of computerization; problems of online research; personality and internet; computer games AB The article discusses the publications in "Psyhologicheskij Zhurnal" devoted to the psychology and Internet. It was found that most of the articles is described some findings in the field of Internet addiction in children and adolescents, in less extent - the psychological characteristics of Internet users, the perspectives for using the internet for psychology (online diagnostics, online research, group interaction on internet, inter net as an environment for personal development, possible new psychological phenomena on internet). This topic has a large, so far almost unrealized research perspectives. C1 [Vilenskaya, G. A.] RAS, FGBUN Inst Psychol, Yaroslavskaya Str 13, Moscow 129366, Russia. C3 Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences; Russian Academy of Sciences RP Vilenskaya, GA (corresponding author), RAS, FGBUN Inst Psychol, Yaroslavskaya Str 13, Moscow 129366, Russia. EM vga2001@mail.ru CR Belovol EV, 2011, PSIKHOL ZH, V32, P49 Chudova N. V., 2002, PSIKHOL ZH, V23, P44 KORNILOVA TV, 1990, PSIKHOL ZH, V11, P32 Plohih V. V, 2014, PSIHOL ZH, V35, P58 Rippinen TO, 2014, PSIKHOL ZH, V35, P18 Romek VG, 2000, PSIKHOL ZH, V21, P70 Sergeev SF, 2014, PSIKHOL ZH, V35, P88 Shapkin SA, 1999, PSIKHOL ZH, V20, P86 Soldatova GU, 2016, PSIKHOL ZH, V37, P83 SOLDATOVA GU, 2013, PSIKHOL ZH, V34, P105 Sushkov IR, 2015, PSIKHOL ZH, V36, P75 Vojskunskij A. E., 2003, PSIKHOL ZH, V24, P104 Vojskunskij A. E., 2013, PSIKHOL ZH, V34, P110 Vojskunskij A. E., 2004, PSIKHOL ZH, V25, P90 Vojskunskij A. E., 2005, PSIKHOL ZH, V26, P47 Vojskunsku A. E., 1999, PSIKHOL ZH, V20, P131 Volkova EN, 2015, PSIKHOL ZH, V36, P20 Zhichkina AY, 2000, PSIKHOL ZH, V21, P75 NR 18 TC 2 Z9 2 PU MEZHDUNARODNAYA KNIGA PI MOSCOW PA 39 DIMITROVA UL., MOSCOW, 113095, RUSSIA PD JUL-AUG PY 2019 VL 40 IS 4 BP 5 EP 14 DI 10.31857/S020595920005330-9 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Wu, R AF Wu, Rui TI Research on the psychological impact and implications of online education SO TECHNOETIC ARTS LA English DT Article DE online education; cyber-psychology; cognitive apprenticeship; autonomic learning; psychological equality; need hierarchy AB In response to the sudden outbreak of COVID-19 in early 2020, the entire Chinese education system was switched to an online teaching model within a short time. As a front-line teaching manager, I am aware that this entails major changes to the teaching environment and information media, with a subtle psychological impact on both 'teaching' and 'learning' subjects. Specifically, information technology has an impact on educational fairness and learners' psychological needs. In this article, I observe the influence of online teaching on learners' cognition and feelings from the perspective of the 'needs hierarchy'. The research findings will be helpful to understanding the impact of information-based teaching methods, and to push forward with new forms of telematic online learning. C1 [Wu, Rui] Shanghai Inst Visual Art DeTao Sch Design, Shanghai, Peoples R China. [Wu, Rui] Shanghai Inst Visual Arts, DeTao Shanghai Ctr, 2200 Wenxiang Rd, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China. RP Wu, R (corresponding author), Shanghai Inst Visual Arts, DeTao Shanghai Ctr, 2200 Wenxiang Rd, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China. EM raewu@detaoma.com CR Ascott R, 2003, WAVING SHAMANTIC WEB Ascott R, 1998, REFRAMING CONSCIOUSN Ascott R, IN PRESS Daniel J. S, 2011, MEGA SCH TECHNOLOGY DeTao Masters Academy, 2020, GREET DETAO NEW MED DeTao Masters Academy, 2020, STOR ONL TEACH OUR T Giordan A., 2015, APPRENDRE Hall E. T, 1966, LEONARDO, V6 Hu J, 2020, IEEE IJCNN Hu YJ, 2021, ENG COMPUTATION, V38, P1117, DOI 10.1108/EC-08-2019-0370 Huang X, 2020, COMMUNICATION Jiagang C, 2017, THEORY PRACTICE COGN Kang L, 2017, PSYCHOL COUNSELOR Maslow A., 1974, MOTIVATION PERSONALI Schunk D. H, 1989, SELF REGULATED LEARN Slavin R., 2012, ED PSYCHOL THEORY PR Sloan K., 2019, ART CYBERNETICS PEDA Steinberg K, 2020, COMMUNICATION Volcoff W., 2020, COMMUNICATION Zou L, 2020, COMMUNICATION NR 20 TC 0 Z9 0 PU INTELLECT LTD PI BRISTOL PA THE MILL, PARNALL RD, BRISTOL, BS16 3JG, ENGLAND PD MAR PY 2020 VL 18 IS 1 BP 59 EP 72 DI 10.1386/tear_00026_1 WC Humanities, Multidisciplinary SC Arts & Humanities - Other Topics ER PT J AU Piazza, J Bering, JM AF Piazza, Jared Bering, Jesse M. TI Evolutionary cyber-psychology: Applying an evolutionary framework to Internet behavior SO COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR LA English DT Review DE Evolutionary psychology; Internet; Parental investment theory; Reputation; Self-disclosure; Sexual competition ID COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; SELF-DISCLOSURE; SEX-DIFFERENCES; STRATEGIC INTERFERENCE; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; ONLINE; AGGRESSION; REPUTATION; GENDER; GOSSIP AB An evolutionary psychological perspective has much to offer the study of Internet behavior. However, cyber-psychologists have hitherto neglected this rich theoretical tradition and evolutionary psychologists have been slow to apply their perspective to computer-mediated behavior. This paper applies an evolutionary perspective to the study of Internet behavior in four relevant domains: (1) mating and sexual competition, (2) parenting and kinship, (3) trust and social exchange, and (4) personal information management. Both general and specific evolutionary theories are explored in relation to online behavior in each domain, with an emphasis on generating testable hypotheses for future research. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. C1 [Piazza, Jared; Bering, Jesse M.] Queens Univ Belfast, Inst Cognit & Culture, Belfast BT7 1NN, Antrim, North Ireland. C3 RLUK- Research Libraries UK; Queens University Belfast RP Piazza, J (corresponding author), Queens Univ Belfast, Inst Cognit & Culture, 2-4 Fitzwilliam St, Belfast BT7 1NN, Antrim, North Ireland. EM jpiazza02@qub.ac.uk CR Alexander R.D., 1987, ESSAYS PEDAGOGY Altman I., 1973, SOCIAL PENETRATION D Archer J, 2004, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V8, P291, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291 Mileham BLA, 2007, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V23, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.033 AXELROD R, 1981, SCIENCE, V211, P1390, DOI 10.1126/science.7466396 Barak A, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P407, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9938 Barclay P, 2006, EVOL HUM BEHAV, V27, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.01.003 Bargh JA, 2003, ONT SYMP P, V9, P195 Barkow JH., 1992, ADAPTED MIND, P159 Barrett H. C., 2008, FDN EVOLUTIONARY PSY BELSKY J, 1991, CHILD DEV, V62, P647, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01558.x Ben-Ze'ev A, 2003, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V19, P451, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00078-X Bering JM, 2005, AM PSYCHOL, V60, P1037, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.1037 Bering JM, 2004, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V8, P227, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.227 BJORKQVIST K, 1994, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V20, P27, DOI 10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO;2-Q Bolton GE, 2004, MANAGE SCI, V50, P1587, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0199 BRUNSTEIN E, 2005, HDB EVOLUTIONARY PSY, P528 Buchanan T., 2007, HLTH INFORM INTERNET, V58, P8 BURNSTEIN E, 1994, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V67, P773, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.773 Buss D. M., 2005, HDB EVOLUTIONARY PSY Buss D. M., 2004, EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOL Buss DM, 1996, PSYCHOL SCI, V7, P373, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00392.x Buss DM, 1997, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V17, P605, DOI 10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00037-8 BUSS DM, 1989, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V12, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00023992 Buss DM, 1999, PERS RELATIONSHIP, V6, P125, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00215.x BUSS DM, 1990, J SOC PERS RELAT, V7, P395, DOI 10.1177/0265407590073006 BUSS DM, 1989, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V56, P735, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.735 BUSS DM, 1993, PSYCHOL REV, V100, P204, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204 Buss DM, 1994, EVOLUTION DESIRE STR Campbell A, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P203, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99001818 *CHIN INT NETW INF, 2008, STAT SURV REP INT DE Chiou WB, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P725, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9961 Chiou WB, 2006, ADOLESCENCE, V41, P547 Christophe V, 1997, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V27, P37, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199701)27:1<37::AID-EJSP806>3.3.CO;2-T Cillessen AHN, 2004, CHILD DEV, V75, P147, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x Cole SW, 1996, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V15, P243, DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.15.4.243 Cosmides L., 1992, ADAPTED MIND EVOLUTI, P163 Cosmides L., 2000, HDB EMOTIONS, P91, DOI [DOI 10.1080/08836610701357922, 10.1007/978-94-007-2969-8] CRICK NR, 1995, CHILD DEV, V66, P710, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x Cronin B, 2001, INFORM SOC, V17, P33, DOI 10.1080/019722401750067414 Cummings JN, 2002, COMMUN ACM, V45, P103, DOI 10.1145/514236.514242 Daneback K, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P100, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9986 Dellarocas C, 2003, MANAGE SCI, V49, P1407, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308 Derks D, 2008, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V24, P766, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004 Dietz-Uhler B, 2005, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V8, P114, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.114 DOERING N, 2002, J COMPUTER MEDIATED, V7 Dunbar RIM, 2004, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V8, P100, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100 EDER D, 1991, AM SOCIOL REV, V56, P494, DOI 10.2307/2096270 Ellis BJ, 2000, CHILD DEV, V71, P485, DOI 10.1111/1467-8624.00159 Finder A., 2006, NY TIMES Gangestad SW, 2000, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V23, P573, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X0000337X Geary D.C., 1998, MALE FEMALE EVOLUTIO GEARY DC, 2005, HDB EVOLUTIONARY PSY, P483 Gibbs JL, 2006, COMMUN RES, V33, P152, DOI 10.1177/0093650205285368 Greiling H, 2000, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V28, P929, DOI 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00151-8 HAMILTON WD, 1964, J THEOR BIOL, V7, P1, DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6 Haselton MG, 2005, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V31, P3, DOI 10.1177/0146167204271303 HENDRICK SS, 1981, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V40, P1150, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.40.6.1150 Hess NH, 2006, HUM NATURE-INT BIOS, V17, P337, DOI 10.1007/s12110-006-1013-z Hess NH, 2006, EVOL HUM BEHAV, V27, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.11.001 HORRIGAN JB, 2008, ONLINE SHOPPING INTE *INT WORLD STATS, 2008, WORLD INT PEN RAT GE Joinson A. N., 2003, UNDERSTANDING PSYCHO Joinson AN, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P472, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.472 Joinson AN, 2001, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V31, P177, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.36 Kelly AE, 1996, PSYCHOL BULL, V120, P450, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.450 Kelly AE, 2001, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V27, P651, DOI 10.1177/0146167201276002 KENRICK DT, 1993, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V64, P951, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.951 KIESLER S, 1984, AM PSYCHOL, V39, P1123, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123 Kiyonari T, 2000, EVOL HUM BEHAV, V21, P411, DOI 10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00055-6 Kraut R, 1998, AM PSYCHOL, V53, P1017, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017 KRAUT R, 2003, PSYCHOL SCI AGEN SUM, P8, DOI DOI 10.HTTPS://D0I.0RG/10.1037/E322322004-008 Kurzban R, 2003, RUSSELL SAGE TRUST, V6, P105 LANE JD, 1995, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V69, P237, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.237 Laurenceau JP, 2005, J FAM PSYCHOL, V19, P314, DOI 10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314 Lea M., 1995, UNDERSTUDIED RELATIO, P197 Lenhart A., 2007, CYBERBULLYING ONLINE Lenhart A, 2006, BLOGGERS PORTRAIT IN Lenhart Amanda, 2006, ONLINE DATING AM WHO Lenhart Amanda, 2007, TEENS SOCIAL MEDIA U Lenhart Amanda, 2007, TEENS PRIVACY ONLINE MACGILL AR, 2007, PARENT TEENAGER INTE Major B, 1999, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V77, P735, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.735 Mallen MJ, 2003, PSYCHOTHERAPY, V40, P155, DOI 10.1037/0033-3204.40.1-2.155 MCANDREW FT, 2002, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V32, P1 McKenna KYA, 1998, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V75, P681, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.681 McKenna KYA, 2002, J SOC ISSUES, V58, P9, DOI 10.1111/1540-4560.00246 McKenna KYA, 2000, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V4, P57, DOI 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6 Morahan-Martin J, 2003, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V19, P659, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00040-2 Nowak MA, 2005, NATURE, V437, P1291, DOI 10.1038/nature04131 Oates K, 2002, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V269, P105, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2001.1875 PAINE CB, 2008, PSYCHOL ASPECTS CYBE Papacharissi Z, 2002, J BROADCAST ELECTRON, V46, P346, DOI 10.1207/s15506878jobem4603_3 PARKS MR, 1996, J COMPUTER MEDIATED, V4 Pennebaker JW, 1990, OPENING HEALING POWE *PEW INT AM LIF PR, 2008, DAIL INT ACT *PEW INT AM LIF PR, 2008, PERC US AD ONL Piazza J, 2008, EVOL HUM BEHAV, V29, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.002 Piazza J, 2008, EVOL PSYCHOL-US, V6, P487 PILKINGTON CJ, 1993, J MARRIAGE FAM, V55, P1056, DOI 10.2307/352796 Postmes T, 2001, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V27, P1243, DOI 10.1177/01461672012710001 QIAN H, 2007, J COMPUTER MEDIATED, V12 Rainie, 2006, STRENGTH INTERNET TI Resnick P, 2000, COMMUN ACM, V43, P45, DOI 10.1145/355112.355122 Resnick P, 2002, ADV APP M-E, V11, P127 Resnick P, 2006, EXP ECON, V9, P79, DOI 10.1007/s10683-006-4309-2 Richardson DR, 1999, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V25, P425 Rollman JB, 2000, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V3, P161, DOI 10.1089/109493100316003 Schmitt D. P., 2001, PSYCHOL EVOLUTION GE, V3, P211, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14616660110119331, 10.1080/14616660110119331] Shackelford TK, 2002, COGNITION EMOTION, V16, P299, DOI 10.1080/02699930143000202 Shackelford TK, 1996, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V22, P1151, DOI 10.1177/01461672962211006 Shklovski I, 2008, CHI 2008: 26TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS VOLS 1 AND 2, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P807 Smart L, 1999, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V77, P474, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.474 SMITH A, 2007, TEENS ONLINE STRANGE Solove DJ, 2007, FUTURE REPUTATION GO Spink A, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P65, DOI 10.1089/109493104322820138 STEFANONE MA, 2007, J COMPUTER MEDIATED, V13 Stewart-Williams S, 2007, EVOL HUM BEHAV, V28, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.01.002 Suler J, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P321, DOI 10.1089/1094931041291295 SULLIVAN B, 2005, KIDS BLOGS TOO MUCH Trivers R. L., 1972, SEXUAL SELECTION DES, P136, DOI DOI 10.1002/AJPA.1330400226 TRIVERS RL, 1971, Q REV BIOL, V46, P35, DOI 10.1086/406755 Valkenburg PM, 2007, DEV PSYCHOL, V43, P267, DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267 Viegas FB, 2005, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V10, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00260.x Vrij A, 2003, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V35, P593, DOI 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00221-0 Walther JB, 2007, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V23, P2538, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002 Whitty M, 2001, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V4, P623, DOI 10.1089/109493101753235223 Whitty MT, 2008, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V24, P1707, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.002 Whitty MT, 2005, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V23, P57, DOI 10.1177/0894439304271536 Whitty MT, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P569, DOI 10.1089/109493103322725342 Whitty MT, 2003, THEOR PSYCHOL, V13, P339, DOI 10.1177/0959354303013003003 WILSON M, 1985, ETHOL SOCIOBIOL, V6, P59, DOI 10.1016/0162-3095(85)90041-X Yang BJ, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P85, DOI 10.1089/109493104322820156 Yao MZ, 2006, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V22, P518, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.008 Yum YO, 2005, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V11 2006, EBAY STAT NR 136 TC 39 Z9 41 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD NOV PY 2009 VL 25 IS 6 BP 1258 EP 1269 DI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.002 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT C AU Li, BB Zhu, TS AF Li, Baobin Zhu, Tingshao BE Zu, Q Hu, B Gu, N Seng, S TI Visualization Analysis for Big Data in Computational CyberPsychology SO HUMAN CENTERED COMPUTING, HCC 2014 SE Lecture Notes in Computer Science LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Computational CyberPsychology; Visualization analysis; Parallel Coordinates ID MENTAL-HEALTH AB This paper discusses issues related to the big data in Computational CyberPsychology, and proposes to utilize Parallel Coordinates, an famous method in the field of information visualization, to improve analyzing data. The experimental results show that Parallel Coordinates will be very helpful and give visual analyzing of big data in studying of Computational CyberPsychology. C1 [Li, Baobin] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Comp & Control, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China. [Zhu, Tingshao] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China. C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Psychology, CAS RP Zhu, TS (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China. EM libb@ucas.ac.cn; tszhu@psych.ac.cn CR Demyttenaere K, 2004, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V291, P2581, DOI 10.1001/jama.291.21.2581 Falkman G, 2001, ARTIF INTELL MED, V22, P133, DOI 10.1016/S0933-3657(00)00104-4 Hamburger YA, 2000, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V16, P441, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00017-0 INSELBERG A, 1990, PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST IEEE CONFERENCE ON VISUALIZATION - VISUALIZATION 90, P361, DOI 10.1109/VISUAL.1990.146402 Li Y., 2011, 3 INT S WEB SOC SWS Meltzer H, 2003, INT REV PSYCHIATR, V15, P185, DOI 10.1080/0954026021000046155 Siirtola H, 2000, IEEE INFOR VIS, P373, DOI 10.1109/IV.2000.859784 Zhu T., 2011, LNCS, V6890, P186 NR 8 TC 2 Z9 2 PU SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN PI BERLIN PA HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY PY 2015 VL 8944 BP 701 EP 707 DI 10.1007/978-3-319-15554-8_59 WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory & Methods SC Computer Science ER PT J AU Fortuna, P AF Fortuna, Pawel TI Positive cyberpsychology as a field of study of the well-being of people interacting with and via technology SO FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Review DE positive cyberpsychology; cyberpsychology; human-computer interaction; positive psychology; well-being; flourishing ID SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; MOTIVATION AB The aim of the article is to postulate introducing and developing positive cyberpsychology (PCyb) as a subdiscipline of cyberpsychology, which emerges at the intersection of cyberpsychology, positive psychology, and well-being informed design, and focuses on studying determinants of human well-being through interactions with and via technology. The article presents the rationale for considering the emergence of PCyb based on the importance of research on the positive transformation of people in the era of progressive digitalization and cyborgization, and the growing partnership of cyberpsychology, positive psychology, and well-being informed design in the form of paradigms and ongoing research. Moreover, it highlights the need to reframe cyberpsychology dominated by the study of the "dark side" of technology and the need to integrate and increase the "visibility" of research results on the beneficial effects of technology. The article also accentuates the opening perspective of a more in-depth analysis of the positive transformation process than the one existing within the well-being informed design and underlines a broader plan of innovation use than is taken into account in cyberpsychology and positive psychology. Lastly, it discusses the use of the results of research conducted within PCyb in the design of new technologies, consulting, and education, as well as the possibility of strengthening the voice of psychologists in the debate about the future of humans functioning in the constantly changing technosphere. C1 [Fortuna, Pawel] John Paul II Catholic Univ Lublin, Dept Expt Psychol, Lublin, Poland. C3 Catholic University of Lublin RP Fortuna, P (corresponding author), John Paul II Catholic Univ Lublin, Dept Expt Psychol, Lublin, Poland. EM pawel.fortuna@kul.pl CR Adhyaru JS, 2022, DIGIT HEALTH, V8, DOI 10.1177/20552076221084473 Ancis J. R., 2020, TECHNOLOGY MIND BEHA, V1, DOI [10.1037/tmb0000009, DOI 10.1037/TMB0000009] [Anonymous], 2021, IND 5 0 Ansado J, 2021, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V120, P583, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.05.018 Aoun JE, 2017, ROBOT-PROOF: HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P1 Aristotle A., 2004, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS Attrill A., 2015, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY Attrill-Smith A., 2019, OXFORD HDB CYBERPSYC Blachnio A., 2010, EUR J PSYCHIAT, P149 Bostrom N., 2017, SUPERINTELLIGENCE PA Brougham D, 2018, J MANAGE ORGAN, V24, P239, DOI 10.1017/jmo.2016.55 Burke J., 2021, POSITIVE PSYCHOL INT Butler J., 2016, INT J WELLBEING, V6, P1, DOI [10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526, DOI 10.5502/IJW.V6I3.526] Calvo R., 2017, POSITIVE COMPUTING T Calvo Rafael A., 2012, Interactions, V19, P28, DOI 10.1145/2212877.2212886 Cave S., 2018, PORTRAYALS PERCEPTIO Chadwick D., 2016, APPL CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, P1 CHI, 2022, US Chiquet S, 2021, VIRTUAL REAL-LONDON, V25, P655, DOI 10.1007/s10055-020-00478-y Chirico A, 2016, FRONT PSYCHOL, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01766 Connolly I., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG Coulson NS, 2022, J MED INTERNET RES, V24, DOI 10.2196/27648 Csikszentmihalyi M, 1990, FLOW PSYCHOL OPTIMAL Desmet PMA, 2013, INT J DES, V7, P5 DIENER E, 1985, J PERS ASSESS, V49, P71, DOI 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 Diessner R, 2018, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V22, P377, DOI 10.1037/gpr0000166 Duckworth AL, 2005, ANNU REV CLIN PSYCHO, V1, P629, DOI 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144154 Emanuel P., 2019, CBCTR1599 CCDC European Commission, 2019, ETH GUID TRUSTW AI Fortuna P., 2021, PREPRINT, DOI [10.1007/s12144-021-01835-z, DOI 10.1007/S12144-021-01835-Z] Fortuna P., 2021, OPTIMUM IDEA CYBERPS Fortuna P, 2022, EUR J PSYCHOL, V18, P207, DOI 10.5964/ejop.5473 Fredrickson BL, 2001, AM PSYCHOL, V56, P218, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 Fryer LK, 2016, INTERNET HIGH EDUC, V30, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.003 Gaggioli A, 2014, NATURE, V512, P28, DOI 10.1038/512028b Galotti K. M., 2004, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL OU Gladden M., 2022, HUM TECHNOL, V18, P98, DOI [10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-2.2, DOI 10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-2.2] Greaney J., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG, P86 Hamilton N.F., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG, P71 Harley D., 2018, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY EVER Hassenzahl M., 2010, SYNTHESIS LECT HUMAN, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.2200/S00261ED1V01Y201003HCI008 James W, 1902, VARIETIES RELIG EXPE Jupiter A., 2016, HUMAN CYBORG CONTINU Kern ML, 2020, J POSIT PSYCHOL, V15, P705, DOI 10.1080/17439760.2019.1639799 Khasawneh OY, 2018, TECHNOL SOC, V54, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.03.008 Ko HC, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P75, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0163 Kumar V, 2019, AIP CONF PROC, V2177, DOI 10.1063/1.5135282 Lawn S, 2017, BMC MED EDUC, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12909-017-1022-0 Liang S., 2014, OPEN J SOC SCI, V2, P57, DOI [10.4236/jss.2014.28009, DOI 10.4236/JSS.2014.28009] Lopez S. J., 2009, ENCY POSITIVE PSYCHO Lukaszewicz-Alcaraz A., 2020, ARE CYBORGS PERSONS Maison D., 2019, C MAIS PARTN WARSZ 7 Marchetti A, 2018, Z PSYCHOL, V226, P98, DOI 10.1027/2151-2604/a000326 Marciano L., 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV REP, V2, DOI [10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100026, DOI 10.1016/J.CHBR.2020.100026] McDonnell D, 2014, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY AND NEW MEDIA: A THEMATIC READER, P170 Millar J., 2017, ROBOT ETHICS 20 AUTO, P2 Modlinski A, 2023, INT J CONSUM STUD, V47, P100, DOI 10.1111/ijcs.12811 Naneva S, 2020, INT J SOC ROBOT, V12, P1179, DOI 10.1007/s12369-020-00659-4 Nguyen MH, 2021, MASS COMMUN SOC, V24, P795, DOI 10.1080/15205436.2021.1979045 Ogonowska A., 2021, CYBERPSYCHOLOGIA MED Patel MS, 2015, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V313, P459, DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.14781 Pearce D., 2007, ABOLITIONIST PROJECT Peters D, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797 Peterson C, 2008, PSYCHOL TODAY Peterson C., 2004, CHARACTER STRENGTHS Phippen A., 2022, ONLINE RESILIENCE WE Prasetyo A. R., 2022, J POSIT PSYCHOL WELL, V6, P539 Riva G., 2018, ROUTLEDGE HDB POSITI Riva G, 2016, INTEGRATING TECHNOLO, DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-9986-1.ch001 Riva G, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P69, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2011.0139 Ryan RM, 2006, MOTIV EMOTION, V30, P347, DOI 10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8 Ryan RM, 2000, AM PSYCHOL, V55, P68, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Seligman M. E., 2011, FLOURISH VISIONARY N Seligman M. E. P., 1998, PRESIDENTS ADDRESS Sheldon KM, 1996, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V22, P1270, DOI 10.1177/01461672962212007 Sillence E., 2018, OXFORD HDB CYBERPSYC, P435 Skov M, 2020, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V15, P630, DOI 10.1177/1745691619897963 Snyder C. R., 2021, OXFORD HDB POSITIVE, V3rd Stiff C., 2019, OXFORD HDB POSITIVE, P370 Taylor J., 2017, IEEE GLOB ENG EDUC C Tegmark M., 2018, LIFE 30 BEING HUMAN Tomasev N, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15871-z Trzebinska E., 2008, PSYCHOL POZYTYWNA Tucholska K., 2007, STUDIA PSYCHOLOGII K, V14, P107 Villani D., 2016, INTEGRATING TECHNOLO, P316 Wanzer DL, 2020, PSYCHOL AESTHET CREA, V14, P113, DOI 10.1037/aca0000203 NR 86 TC 0 Z9 0 PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA PI LAUSANNE PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND PD FEB 23 PY 2023 VL 14 AR 1053482 DI 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1053482 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT C AU Ruh, P Morgenstern, H AF Ruh, Paulina Morgenstern, Holger BE Stephanidis, C Antona, M Ntoa, S TI Establishing Cyberpsychology at Universities in the Area of Cyber Security SO HCI INTERNATIONAL 2021 - LATE BREAKING POSTERS, HCII 2021, PT II SE Communications in Computer and Information Science LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Cyberpsychology; Module development; Information security AB Cyberpsychology deals with the question of the extent to which people interact with technologies, such as computers, and how this can lead to different types of behavior. It also investigates the extent to which behavior and one's own identity can change, depending on the current sphere of activity - either online or offline. Therefore, Cyberpsychology can be a powerful addition to the currently technical oriented Cyber Security. In addition, an overview is provided of what other universities and colleges in and outside Europe offer in the field of cyberpsychology in terms of modules. To the end of the methodology module contents, learning outcomes and the final implementation are discussed. This includes a model with different phases like call for lecturers, preparing transcripts and presentations. Additionally, the European ECTS to hour ratio will be used to determine an appropriate number of working hours. In conclusion, the design of the branch of cyberpsychology at universities is described as future-oriented and promising, while the development at other colleges and universities is undergoing similar changes. Although not necessarily in the field of cyberpsychology, the technical courses of study, and especially computer science, are increasingly oriented towards cyber security and the like. C1 [Morgenstern, Holger] Albstadt Sigmaringen Univ, Albstadt, Germany. EM morgenstern@hs-albsig.de CR [Anonymous], 2017, STATISTA DAS STATIST Attrill A., 2015, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY Gormer J., 2018, ANONMYITAT DARKNET N ITU, 2018, ANZAHL INTERNETNUTZE Kirwan GH, 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG, P139 Komenda T, 2013, IEEE GLOB ENG EDUC C, P906, DOI 10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530214 Nier H., 2017, DEUTSCHLAND FEHLEN I Palmetshofer W., 2017, WERT PERSONLICHER DA Power A., 2014, PSYCHOLOGY Rudnicka J., 2019, ANZAHL STUDIERENDEN NR 10 TC 0 Z9 0 PU SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG PI CHAM PA GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND PY 2021 VL 1499 BP 294 EP 301 DI 10.1007/978-3-030-90179-0_38 WC Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science, Theory & Methods SC Computer Science ER PT J AU Guitton, MJ AF Guitton, Matthieu J. TI Issues and Debates in Cyberpsychology SO COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR LA English DT Book Review C1 [Guitton, Matthieu J.] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Pavillon Ferdinand Vandry,1050 Ave Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada. [Guitton, Matthieu J.] CERVO Brain Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada. C3 Laval University RP Guitton, MJ (corresponding author), Univ Laval, Fac Med, Pavillon Ferdinand Vandry,1050 Ave Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada. EM matthieu.guitton@fmed.ulaval.ca CR Kaye L. K., 2022, ISSUES DEBATES CYBER NR 1 TC 0 Z9 0 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD OCT PY 2022 VL 135 AR 107361 DI 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107361 EA JUN 2022 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Chen, YX Li, RX Liu, XP AF Chen, Yunxiang Li, Ruoxuan Liu, Xiangping TI The Relationships Among Relatedness Frustration, Affiliation Motivation, and WeChat Engagement, Moderated by Relatedness Satisfaction SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL RESEARCH ON CYBERSPACE LA English DT Article DE Relatedness frustration; affiliation motivation; WeChat engagement; moderation; relatedness satisfaction ID PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS; JOB CHARACTERISTICS; FACEBOOK USE; SITES; GRATIFICATIONS; OSTRACISM; AUTONOMY; BEHAVIOR; MOTIVES; BELONG AB The current study was designed based on the two-process model of the relatedness need to investigate the cyberpsychological mechanisms in the relationship between relatedness frustration and social networking sites (SNSs) behaviors. Chinese college students (N = 494; 190 males; M-age = 18.81 +/- .92) were recruited to complete online questionnaires to measure relatedness frustration, relatedness satisfaction, affiliation motivation, and WeChat engagement. Path analyses indicated that relatedness frustration was directly related to defensive WeChat engagement and indirectly related to WeChat involvement and active engagement via affiliation motivation. Affiliation motivation played a significant mediating role, with the relationship between affiliation motivation and WeChat involvement being moderated by relatedness satisfaction. Specifically, this relationship existed only when the level of relatedness satisfaction was high. This study helps to understand motivational coping mechanisms among people with different levels of relatedness satisfaction in relation to SNSs after experiencing relatedness frustration. Potential limitations and future directions of this paper to the cyber-psychology literature are discussed. C1 [Chen, Yunxiang; Li, Ruoxuan; Liu, Xiangping] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Psychol, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China. C3 Beijing Normal University RP Liu, XP (corresponding author), Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Psychol, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China. EM xpliu599@163.com CR BAUMEISTER RF, 1995, PSYCHOL BULL, V117, P497, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 Baumeister RF, 2007, SOC PERSONAL PSYCHOL, V1, P506, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00020.x Bradley RH, 2002, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V53, P371, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233 Chen BW, 2015, MOTIV EMOTION, V39, P216, DOI 10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1 Chen HT, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P806, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2011.0608 Chen YX, 2021, CURR PSYCHOL, V40, P5445, DOI 10.1007/s12144-019-00513-5 Chester DS, 2016, COGN AFFECT BEHAV NE, V16, P541, DOI 10.3758/s13415-016-0412-9 Chiou WB, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V49, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.064 Chiou WB, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P68, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2013.0035 Cordeiro P, 2016, LEARN INDIVID DIFFER, V47, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.010 Deci EL, 2008, CAN PSYCHOL, V49, P14, DOI 10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14 Fang H, 2018, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00314 Fernet C, 2013, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V22, P123, DOI 10.1080/1359432X.2011.632161 Fisher RJ, 2000, PSYCHOL MARKET, V17, P105, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<105::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-9 Geldhof GJ, 2014, PSYCHOL METHODS, V19, P72, DOI 10.1037/a0032138 Gerber J, 2009, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V4, P468, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01158.x Gerson J, 2017, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V117, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.034 Grieve R, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017 [贺金波 He Jinbo], 2017, [中国临床心理学杂志, Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology], V25, P221 Heser K, 2015, SWISS J PSYCHOL, V74, P37, DOI 10.1024/1421-0185/a000144 Hou J, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00545 Hou J, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0183633 Hughes DJ, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P561, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.001 Jiang F., 2015, J SHANGHAI JIAOTONG, V23, P104 [姜永志 Jiang Yongzhi], 2017, [中国临床心理学杂志, Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology], V25, P550 Kaye L. K., 2021, COMPUTERS HUMAN BEHA, V3, DOI [10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100083, DOI 10.1016/J.CHBR.2021.100083] Klein A, 2000, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V65, P457, DOI 10.1007/BF02296338 Knowles ML, 2015, SOC PSYCHOL-GERMANY, V46, P313, DOI 10.1027/1864-9335/a000246 Langan-Fox J, 2006, J PERS ASSESS, V87, P277, DOI 10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_09 Lee CC, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P419, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0544 Maner JK, 2007, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V92, P42, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42 McClelland DC, 1991, PERSONAL VALUE QUEST McNeish D, 2018, PSYCHOL METHODS, V23, P412, DOI 10.1037/met0000144 Moller AC, 2010, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V36, P754, DOI 10.1177/0146167210371622 Mouratidis AA, 2011, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V103, P353, DOI 10.1037/a0022773 Muller D, 2005, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V89, P852, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852 Neubauer AB, 2018, J RES PERS, V77, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.001 Papacharissi Z, 2011, COMMUN SOC-SER, P212 Park J., 2011, THESIS MICHIGAN STAT Park N, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1974, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.004 Prentice M, 2014, SOC PERSONAL PSYCHOL, V8, P73, DOI 10.1111/spc3.12088 Qiu L, 2013, J CROSS CULT PSYCHOL, V44, P106, DOI 10.1177/0022022111434597 Radel R, 2011, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V101, P919, DOI 10.1037/a0025196 Ren DM, 2016, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V7, P204, DOI 10.1177/1948550615616169 Richman LS, 2009, PSYCHOL REV, V116, P365, DOI 10.1037/a0015250 Ryan R. M., 2006, DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHO, P795, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470939383.CH20 Ryan T., 2017, J RELATIONSHIP RES, V8, pe8, DOI DOI 10.1017/JRR.2017.13 Schuler J, 2013, MOTIV EMOTION, V37, P480, DOI 10.1007/s11031-012-9317-2 Schuler J, 2010, J RES PERS, V44, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.002 SELYE H, 1950, BRIT MED J, V1, P1383, DOI 10.1136/bmj.1.4667.1383 Sheldon KM, 2011, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V101, P1106, DOI 10.1037/a0024952 Sheldon KM, 2011, PSYCHOL REV, V118, P552, DOI 10.1037/a0024758 Sheldon KM, 2011, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V100, P766, DOI 10.1037/a0022407 Skues JL, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P2414, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.012 Smith AG, 2008, POLIT PSYCHOL, V29, P55, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00612.x Sultan AJ, 2014, SOC SCI J, V51, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.soscij.2013.09.003 Trepanier SG, 2015, WORK STRESS, V29, P286, DOI 10.1080/02678373.2015.1074957 Trifiro BM, 2019, SOC MEDIA SOC, V5, DOI 10.1177/2056305119848743 Tsoi SLNMTA, 2018, ADV HEALTH SCI EDUC, V23, P549, DOI 10.1007/s10459-018-9812-7 Van Petegem S, 2013, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V42, P994, DOI 10.1007/s10964-012-9847-7 Vansteenkiste M, 2013, J PSYCHOTHER INTEGR, V23, P263, DOI 10.1037/a0032359 Wang JL, 2018, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V36, P511, DOI 10.1177/0894439317721981 Wen ZB, 2016, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V19, P587, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2016.0154 Wesselmann E. D., 2014, HDB SOLITUDE PSYCHOL, P224, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118427378.CH13 Williams KD, 2009, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V41, P275, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1 Yu RP, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V58, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.019 Zhou J., 2014, THESIS WUHAN U NR 67 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MASARYKOVA UNIV, FAC SOCIAL STUDIES PI BRNO PA JOSTOVA 10, BRNO, 602 00, CZECH REPUBLIC PY 2021 VL 15 IS 4 AR 7 DI 10.5817/CP2021-4-7 WC Communication; Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Communication; Psychology ER PT C AU Ali, R McAlaney, J Faily, S Phalp, K Katos, V AF Ali, Raian McAlaney, John Faily, Shamal Phalp, Keith Katos, Vasilios BE Wu, YL Min, GY Georgalas, N Hu, J Atzori, L Jin, XL Jarvis, S Liu, L Calvo, RA TI Mitigating Circumstances in Cybercrime: a Position Paper SO CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS - DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING - PERVASIVE INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE mitigating circumstances; cybercrime; cyberspace ID INTERNET AB This paper argues the need for considering mitigating circumstances in cybercrime. Mitigating circumstances are conditions which moderate the culpability of an offender of a committed offence. Our argument is based on several observations. The cyberspace introduces a new family of communication and interaction styles and designs which could facilitate, make available, deceive, and in some cases persuade, a user to commit an offence. User's lack of awareness could be a valid mitigation when using software features introduced without a proper management of change and enough precautionary mechanisms, e.g. warning messages. The cyber behaviour of users may not be necessarily a reflection of their real character and intention. Their irrational and unconscious actions may result from their immersed and prolonged presence in a particular cyber context. Hence, the consideration of the cyberspace design, the "cyber psychological" status of an offender and their inter-relation could form a new family of mitigating circumstances inherent and unique to cybercrime. This paper elaborates on this initial argument from different perspectives including software engineering, cyber psychology, digital forensics, social responsibility and law. C1 [Ali, Raian; McAlaney, John; Faily, Shamal; Phalp, Keith; Katos, Vasilios] Bournemouth Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England. C3 Bournemouth University RP Ali, R (corresponding author), Bournemouth Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England. EM rali@bournemouth.ac.uk; jmcalaney@bournemouth.ac.uk; sfaily@bournemouth.ac.uk; kphalp@bournemouth.ac.uk; vkatos@bournemouth.ac.uk CR Ali R., 2015, 20 INT WORK C REQ EN American Psychiatric Association, 2022, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, V5th ed Barker V, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P209, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0228 Brunskill D, 2013, AUSTRALAS PSYCHIATRY, V21, P527, DOI 10.1177/1039856213509289 Bruya B, 2010, EFFORTLESS ATTENTION Casey E, 2015, DIGIT INVEST, V12, pS102, DOI 10.1016/j.diin.2015.01.014 Coleman G., 2014, HACKER HOAXER WHISTL Cooper A., 2014, FACE ESSENTIALS INTE Csikszentmihalyi M, 2002, FLOW CLASSIC WORK AC DARLEY JM, 1992, PSYCHOL INQ, V3, P199, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327965P1I0302_28 Deterding S., 2011, P 15 INT ACAD MINDTR, P12, DOI [10.1145/2181037.2181040, DOI 10.1145/2181037.2181040] Festinger L, 1954, HUM RELAT, V7, P117, DOI 10.1177/001872675400700202 Fogg BJ, 2002, PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOG Gilson R. D., 2010, HDB AVIATION HUMAN F Harmat L, 2015, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V97, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.05.001 Jiang J., 2015, 20 INT WORK C REQ EN Mason KL, 2008, PSYCHOL SCHOOLS, V45, P323, DOI 10.1002/pits.20301 McKenna KYA, 2002, J SOC ISSUES, V58, P9, DOI 10.1111/1540-4560.00246 Moreno MA, 2011, ARCH PEDIAT ADOL MED, V165, P797, DOI 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.58 Pasquale L, 2013, S VIS LANG HUM CEN C, P340, DOI 10.1109/RE.2013.6636745 Patil P, 2013, EUROPEAN PSYCHIAT, V28, P1 Radford J., 1982, CAUSES QUESTIONS LAW Rowlingson R., 2004, INT J DIGIT EVID, V2, P1 Rumney P.N.S., 2011, J CRIMINAL LAW, V75, P473, DOI https://doi.org/10.1350/jcla.2011.75.6.737 Schuler J, 2013, APPL PSYCHOL-HLTH WE, V5, P311, DOI 10.1111/aphw.12012 Suler J, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P321, DOI 10.1089/1094931041291295 Thaler RH., 2009, NUDGE IMPROVING DECI Underwood JDM, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1621, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.012 WALLACH MA, 1962, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V65, P75, DOI 10.1037/h0044376 NR 29 TC 0 Z9 0 PU IEEE PI NEW YORK PA 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA PY 2015 BP 1973 EP 1977 DI 10.1109/CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM.2015.292 WC Computer Science, Hardware & Architecture; Computer Science, Software Engineering; Computer Science, Theory & Methods SC Computer Science ER PT J AU Tanrikulu, T AF Tanrikulu, Taskin TI Cyberbullying and Basic Needs: A Predictive Study within the Framework of Choice Theory SO ANTHROPOLOGIST LA English DT Article DE Cyber Harassment; Virtual Bullying; Digital Bullying Cyber Psychology; Glasser ID CYBER-AGGRESSION; ADOLESCENTS; IMPACT; RISK; INVOLVEMENT; STUDENTS; EMPATHY AB This research investigated the degree to which basic needs, determined within the framework of choice theory, predict cyberbullying behavior. For this purpose, in the second semester of the 2012-2013 academic year, 685 students were recruited from four public high schools in Istanbul, of whom 341 students were women (50.2%); 344 were men, (49.8). Their average age was between 15 and 19. In the Study, basic needs were discussed in the dimensions of being free, belonging, power and enjoyment. Progressive regression analysis was conducted in order to explore cyberbullying prediction level of basic needs. For the regression analysis, first, the suitability of data was examined and it revealed that cyberbullying behaviors were understood to be predicted by the needs of belonging and power. Given that these two variables together explained 12.8 percent of cyberbullying, it could be argued that there is a negative relationship between them: when the level of belonging needs and power decrease, tendency to cyberbullying behaviors increases. C1 Fatih Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Psychol Counseling & Guidance, TR-34500 Istanbul, Turkey. C3 Fatih University RP Tanrikulu, T (corresponding author), Fatih Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Psychol Counseling & Guidance, TR-34500 Istanbul, Turkey. EM ttanrikulu@fatih.edu.tr CR Agatston PW, 2007, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V41, pS59, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.003 Ang RP, 2010, CHILD PSYCHIAT HUM D, V41, P387, DOI 10.1007/s10578-010-0176-3 [Anonymous], INSIGHTS CHANGING WO [Anonymous], GAZIANTEP U SOSYAL B [Anonymous], THESIS [Anonymous], AERA CONFERENCE [Anonymous], 2007, ABANT ZZET BAYSAL UN [Anonymous], DENEYSEL OLARAK SINA [Anonymous], AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL O [Anonymous], 2014, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.5817/CP2014-4-6 [Anonymous], JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SC [Anonymous], CYBERBULLYING AND CY [Anonymous], BULLYING BEYOND THE [Anonymous], 1985, THEOR PRACT, DOI DOI 10.1080/00405848509543181 [Anonymous], APPLIED MULTIVARIATE [Anonymous], 2009, ED ADM THEORY PRACTI [Anonymous], THESIS [Anonymous], THESIS [Anonymous], 2011, ED ADM THEORY PRACT [Anonymous], THE MAKING OF PSYCHO [Anonymous], PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL [Anonymous], CHOICE THEORY A NEW [Anonymous], 2012, J HASAN ALI YUCEL FA [Anonymous], 1993, ANKARA U J FACULTY E [Anonymous], 2009, ED SCI THEORY PRACTI [Anonymous], THESIS Aricak OT, 2009, EGIT ARAST, V8, P167 Aricak T, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P253, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.0016 Barlett CP, 2015, J ADOLESCENCE, V41, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.02.006 Beran T., 2005, Journal of Educational Computing Research, V32, P265, DOI 10.2190/8YQM-B04H-PG4D-BLLH Brack K, 2014, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, V8, P12, DOI DOI 10.5817/C Brewer G, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V48, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.073 Calvete E, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P1128, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017 Cetin B, 2012, KURAM UYGUL EGIT BIL, V12, P646 Didden R, 2009, DEV NEUROREHABIL, V12, P146, DOI 10.1080/17518420902971356 Dilma├a┬ B., 2010, WORLD ACAD SCI ENG T, V4, P1667, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.1330259 Dooley JJ, 2009, Z PSYCHOL, V217, P182, DOI 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182 Dredge R, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V40, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.035 Erdur-Baker O, 2007, EURASIAN J EDUC RES, V7, P31 Estell DB, 2007, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V33, P145, DOI 10.1002/ab.20176 Field A, 2009, DISCOVERING STAT USI, V5th Gualdo AMG, 2015, COMPUT EDUC, V82, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.013 Glover D, 2000, EDUC RES, V42, P141, DOI 10.1080/001318800363782 Goebert D, 2011, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V15, P1282, DOI 10.1007/s10995-010-0672-x Grigg DW, 2010, AUST J GUID COUNS, V20, P143, DOI 10.1375/ajgc.20.2.143 Hinduja S, 2010, ARCH SUICIDE RES, V14, P206, DOI 10.1080/13811118.2010.494133 Horzum MB., 2010, ACAD SIGHT INT REFER, V19, P1 Huang YY, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P1581, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005 Jacobs NCL, 2014, J ADOLESCENCE, V37, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.011 Jose PE, 2012, J RES ADOLESCENCE, V22, P301, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00764.x Katzer C., 2009, J MEDIA PSYCHOL-GER, V21, P25, DOI DOI 10.1027/1864-1105.21.1.25 Kiriakidis SP, 2010, FAM COMMUNITY HEALTH, V33, P82, DOI 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3181d593e4 Konig A, 2010, AUST J GUID COUNS, V20, P210, DOI 10.1375/ajgc.20.2.210 Kubiszewski V, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V43, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.049 Li Q, 2007, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V23, P1777, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.005 Lonigro A, 2015, CHILD PSYCHIAT HUM D, V46, P445, DOI 10.1007/s10578-014-0484-0 Mason KL, 2008, PSYCHOL SCHOOLS, V45, P323, DOI 10.1002/pits.20301 Morales M, 2011, J CONS HLTH INTERNET, V15, P407, DOI 10.1080/15398285.2011.623593 Navarro R, 2012, CHILD INDIC RES, V5, P281, DOI 10.1007/s12187-011-9132-4 Nixon CL, 2014, ADOLESC HEALTH MED T, V5, P143, DOI 10.2147/AHMT.S36456 Patchin J. W., 2006, YOUTH VIOLENCE JUVEN, V4, P148, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1541204006286288, 10.1177/1541204006286288] Patchin JW, 2011, YOUTH SOC, V43, P727, DOI 10.1177/0044118X10366951 Patchin JW, 2010, J SCHOOL HEALTH, V80, P614, DOI 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00548.x Peker A., 2012, ABANT IZZET BAYSAL B, V12, P185 Raskauskas J, 2007, DEV PSYCHOL, V43, P564, DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564 Schneider SK, 2012, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V102, P171, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300308 Schoffstall CL, 2011, SOC DEV, V20, P587, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00609.x Schultze-Krumbholz A, 2009, Z PSYCHOL, V217, P224, DOI 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.224 Siegle D., 2010, GIFTED CHILD TODAY, V32, P14, DOI DOI 10.1177/107621751003300206 Slonje R, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024 Sourander A, 2010, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V67, P720, DOI 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79 Spears B, 2009, Z PSYCHOL, V217, P189, DOI 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.189 Tanrikulu T., 2014, ED RES REV, V9, P660, DOI DOI 10.5897/ERR2014.1761 Tanrikulu T, 2015, NEW MEDIA SOC, V17, P708, DOI 10.1177/1461444813511923 Twyman K, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P195, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0137 Vandebosch H, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P499, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.0042 Wong-Lo M, 2011, EMOT BEHAV DIFFIC, V16, P317, DOI 10.1080/13632752.2011.595098 Wright V. H., 2009, J COMPUT TEACH ED, V26, P35 NR 78 TC 3 Z9 3 PU KAMLA-RAJ ENTERPRISES PI GURGAON PA B2-GROUND FLR, SOUTH CITY II, GURGAON, HARYANA 122 018, INDIA PD JUN PY 2015 VL 20 IS 3 BP 573 EP 583 DI 10.1080/09720073.2015.11891761 WC Anthropology; Multidisciplinary Sciences; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary SC Anthropology; Science & Technology - Other Topics; Social Sciences - Other Topics ER PT J AU Guitton, MJ AF Guitton, Matthieu J. TI Cyberpsychology research and COVID-19 SO COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR LA English DT Editorial Material C1 [Guitton, Matthieu J.] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Pavillon Ferdinand Vandry Room 4889,1050 Ave Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada. [Guitton, Matthieu J.] CERVO Brain Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada. C3 Laval University RP Guitton, MJ (corresponding author), Univ Laval, Fac Med, Pavillon Ferdinand Vandry Room 4889,1050 Ave Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada. EM matthieu.guitton@fmed.ulaval.ca CR Guitton MJ, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P2756, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.027 NR 1 TC 43 Z9 43 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD OCT PY 2020 VL 111 AR 106357 DI 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106357 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Wiederhold, BK AF Wiederhold, Brenda K. TI The 14th Annual CyberTherapy & CyberPsychology Conference SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR LA English DT Editorial Material NR 0 TC 1 Z9 1 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD OCT PY 2009 VL 12 IS 5 BP 475 EP 475 DI 10.1089/cpb.2009.9994 WC Communication; Psychology, Applied SC Communication; Psychology ER PT J AU Gradinaru, C AF Gradinaru, Camelia TI Cyberpsychology as Everyday Digital Experience Across the Lifespan SO EUROPES JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Book Review C1 [Gradinaru, Camelia] Alexandru Ioan Cuza Univ, Dept Interdisciplinary Res Social Sci & Humanitie, Lascar Catargi 54, Iasi 700107, Romania. C3 Alexandru Ioan Cuza University RP Gradinaru, C (corresponding author), Alexandru Ioan Cuza Univ, Dept Interdisciplinary Res Social Sci & Humanitie, Lascar Catargi 54, Iasi 700107, Romania. EM camelia.gradinaru@uaic.ro CR Flichy P, 2003, INNOVATION TECHNIQUE Harley D., 2018, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY EVER Marwick AE, 2011, NEW MEDIA SOC, V13, P114, DOI 10.1177/1461444810365313 Papacharissi Z, 2018, NETWORKED SELF PLATF NR 4 TC 0 Z9 0 PU PSYCHOPEN PI TRIER PA UNIVERSITAETSRING 15, TRIER, 54296, GERMANY PD NOV PY 2018 VL 14 IS 4 BP 966 EP 969 DI 10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1795 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Wiederhold, BK AF Wiederhold, Brenda K. TI Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking Completes Another Milestone SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Editorial Material NR 0 TC 2 Z9 2 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD DEC PY 2010 VL 13 IS 6 BP 599 EP 600 DI 10.1089/cyber.2010.1505 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Griffin, R AF Griffin, Robert TI Cyberpsychology as Everyday Experience Across the Lifespan SO PSYCHOLOGIST LA English DT Book Review C1 [Griffin, Robert] Dun Laoghaire Inst Art Design & Technol, MSc Cyberpsychol, Dublin, Ireland. C3 Dun Laoghaire Institute of Art & Design RP Griffin, R (corresponding author), Dun Laoghaire Inst Art Design & Technol, MSc Cyberpsychol, Dublin, Ireland. CR HARLEY D, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY EVER NR 1 TC 0 Z9 0 PU BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOC PI LEICESTER PA ST ANDREWS HOUSE, 48 PRINCESS RD EAST, LEICESTER LE1 7DR, LEICS, ENGLAND PD NOV PY 2018 VL 31 BP 70 EP 70 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Smahel, D Dedkova, L Daneback, K AF Smahel, David Dedkova, Lenka Daneback, Kristian TI Editorial: Cyberpsychology has readers from 192 countries SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL RESEARCH ON CYBERSPACE LA English DT Editorial Material C1 [Smahel, David; Dedkova, Lenka] Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Brno, Czech Republic. [Daneback, Kristian] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Social Work, Gothenburg, Sweden. C3 Masaryk University Brno; University of Gothenburg RP Smahel, D (corresponding author), Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Brno, Czech Republic. EM smahel@fss.muni.cz; Idedkova@fss.muni.cz; kristian.daneback@socwork.gu.se NR 0 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MASARYKOVA UNIV, FAC SOCIAL STUDIES PI BRNO PA JOSTOVA 10, BRNO, 602 00, CZECH REPUBLIC PY 2017 VL 11 IS 4 DI 10.5817/CP2017-4-xx WC Communication; Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Communication; Psychology ER PT J AU Voiskounsky, AE AF Voiskounsky, A. E. TI PERSPECTIVES OF FORMATION OF INTERNET PSYCHOLOGY SO PSIKHOLOGICHESKII ZHURNAL LA Russian DT Article DE psychology of computerization; cyberpsychology; psychology of the Internet; areas in psychology; semantic theory of thinking AB The formation and development under O.K. Tikhomirov's research program of such area as psychology of computerization is described. The problems of psychology of computerization (cyberpsychology) development as a new field of research in modern psychological science are considered. Topicality of studies of computerized activity and psychological influence of computers and the Internet on person is shown. Modern condition is analyzed and potential of development of psychology of computerization (cyberpsychology) as special field of psychological researches in the Internet is defined. C1 Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Dept Psychol, Moscow, Russia. C3 Lomonosov Moscow State University RP Voiskounsky, AE (corresponding author), Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Dept Psychol, Moscow, Russia. EM vaemsu@gmail.com CR BOGOMOLOVA NN, 1988, MASSOVAYA KOMMUNIKAT BONIVELL I, 2009, KLYUCHI K BLAGOPOLUC GLUSHKOV VM, 1978, KIBERNETIKA I DIALEK IVANOV MS, 2008, PSIHOLOGIYA SAMOREAL KRISTENSEN ZH, 1991, CHELOVECHESKIY FAKTO, P32 KUZNETSOVA YUM, 2008, PSIHOLOGIYA ZHITELEY LEONTEV AA, 1997, OSNOVYI PSIHOLINGVIS LOMOV BF, 1966, CHELOVEK I TEHNIKA O Minsky M., 1967, COMPUTATION FINITE I Minsky M., 2006, EMOTION MACHINE NYUELL A, 1965, PSIHOLOGIYA MYISHLEN, P457 SHERKOVIN YUA, 1973, PSIHOLOGICHESKIE PRO SIMON HA, 1958, OPER RES, V6, P1, DOI 10.1287/opre.6.1.1 Tihomirov O., 1984, PSIHOLOGIYA MYISHLEN Tihomirov O. K., 1999, TRADITSII I PRESPEKT, P191 TIHOMIROV OK, 1993, PSIHOLOGICHESKIY ZHU, V1, P114 TIHOMIROV OK, 1969, STRUKTURA MYISLITELN TIHOMIROV OK, 1993, VESTNIK MGU SER 14 P, V2, P31 TIHOMIROV OK, 1985, PSIHOLOGICHESKIE PRO TIHOMIROV OK, 1974, VOPR PSIHOL, V1, P40 TIHOMIROV OK, 1986, EVM I NOVYIE PROBLEM TIHOMIROV OK, 1988, PSIHOLOGIYA KOMPYUTE VAN POVEDSKAYA, 2007, CHELOVEK I NOVYIE IN VOLODARSKAYA EA, 2009, METODOLOGIYA I ISTOR, V4, P28 VOYSKUNSKIY A, 2002, UCHENYYE ZAPISKI KAF, P82 VOYSKUNSKIY AE, 2011, PSIHOLOGIYA ZHURNAL, V4, P29 VOYSKUNSKIY AE, 2010, ZHURNAL PRAKTICHESKO, V4, P7 VOYSKUNSKIY AE, 2010, INTERNET VOYSKUNSKIY AE, 2008, VESTNIK MOSKOVSKOGO, V2, P140 Yan Z, 2013, EVOLVING PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON CYBER BEHAVIOR, P1, DOI [10.1111/J.1467-8721.2009.01595.X, 10.4018/978-1-4666-1858-9.ch001] 1976, ISKUSSTVENNYIY INTEL 1987, PSIHOLOGICHESKIE PRO 1972, CHELOVEK I KOMPYUTER NR 33 TC 6 Z9 13 PU MEZHDUNARODNAYA KNIGA PI MOSCOW PA 39 DIMITROVA UL., MOSCOW, 113095, RUSSIA PD MAY-JUN PY 2013 VL 34 IS 3 BP 110 EP 118 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Kaye, LK AF Kaye, Linda K. TI An Introduction to Cyberpsychology SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Book Review C1 [Kaye, Linda K.] Edge Hill Univ, Dept Psychol, St Helens Rd, Ormskirk L39 4QP, England. C3 Edge Hill University RP Kaye, LK (corresponding author), Edge Hill Univ, Dept Psychol, St Helens Rd, Ormskirk L39 4QP, England. EM linda.kaye@edgehill.ac.uk CR CONNOLLY I, 2016, INTRO CYBERPYSCHOLOG NR 1 TC 2 Z9 2 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD APR 1 PY 2016 VL 19 IS 4 BP 294 EP 294 DI 10.1089/cyber.2016.29033.lkk WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Huang, YT Su, SF AF Huang, Yi-Ting Su, Sheng-Fang TI Motives for Instagram Use and Topics of Interest among Young Adults SO FUTURE INTERNET LA English DT Article DE cyber-psychology; Instagram; motive of usage; social interaction; social media; visual commerce ID PERSONALITY-TRAITS; THINKING STYLE; MEDIA USE; WEB; MODEL; GRATIFICATIONS; INFORMATION; ADDICTION; ABILITY; ONLINE AB Instagram is currently the most popular social media app among young people around the world. More than 70% of people between the ages of 12 and 24 are Instagram users. The research framework of this study was constructed based on smartphone addiction and the uses and gratifications theory. We used 27 question items divided into five factors, namely social interaction, documentation, diversion, self-promotion, and creativity, to investigate the motives for Instagram use and topics of interest among university students in Taiwan. A total of 307 valid questionnaires were obtained. The results revealed that on the whole, the motives for Instagram use were mostly to look at posts, particularly involving social interaction and diversion motives. The level of agreement expressed toward motives for creating posts was lower. Gender, professional training background, and level of addiction to Instagram all exert influence on motives for Instagram use. Over half of the students majoring in design followed artisans and celebrities (including designers), and female students noticed ads on Instagram more than male students did. C1 [Huang, Yi-Ting; Su, Sheng-Fang] Chung Yuan Christian Univ, Dept Commercial Design, Taoyuan 32023, Taiwan. C3 Chung Yuan Christian University RP Huang, YT (corresponding author), Chung Yuan Christian Univ, Dept Commercial Design, Taoyuan 32023, Taiwan. EM ythuang@cycu.edu.tw; sunny14480363@gmail.com FU Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [MOST 106-2410-H-033-034-] FX This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan; Grant No. MOST 106-2410-H-033-034-. CR Alter A., 2017, IRRESISTIBLE RISE AD, P38 [Anonymous], INSIGHTXPLORER BIWEE, V67 [Anonymous], INSIGHTXPLORER BIWEE, V80 [Anonymous], SNAPCH AD STILL SURG Blumler J.G., 1976, USES MASS COMMUNICAT, V40, P318 Brewer M.B., 2011, INDIVIDUAL SELF RELA, V56, P98 Celik S, 2012, TURK ONLINE J DISTAN, V13, P10 Charney T., 2001, COMMUNICATION TECHNO, P383 Davis S.L., 2004, P M AM ED RES ASS SA Denny K, 2007, J HUM RESOUR, V42, P353 DUNNING D, 1989, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V57, P1082, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082 Dunning D., 2005, SELF INSIGHT ROADBLO, P166 Durak HY, 2018, COMPUT EDUC, V116, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004 Eastman S. T., 1998, COMMUNICATION YB, V21, P323, DOI DOI 10.1080/23808985.1998.11678954 Edison, PODC CONS 2017 FIND, TAIW LOV FB LIN HAV Graf S, 2008, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V24, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.004 Greenwood DN, 2013, PSYCHOL POP MEDIA CU, V2, P222, DOI 10.1037/ppm0000013 Highfield T., 2015, P ANN M INT COMM ASS JENSEN KB, 1990, EUROPEAN J COMMUNICA, V5, P207, DOI DOI 10.1177/0267323190005002005 Kao GYM, 2008, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V24, P1330, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.009 Kaye BK, 2002, J BROADCAST ELECTRON, V46, P54, DOI 10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_4 Kim YJ, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V33, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.015 Kozhevnikov M, 2005, MEM COGNITION, V33, P710, DOI 10.3758/BF03195337 Lakhal S, 2012, INT J MANAG EDUC, V10, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.ijme.2012.03.003 Livingstone S., 1999, NEW MEDIA SOC, V1, P59, DOI [10.1177/1461444899001001010, DOI 10.1177/1461444899001001010] Marcus S.R., 2015, P INT COMM ASS C SAN Mashal N, 2007, BRAIN LANG, V100, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.005 McQuail D., 2010, MCQUAILS MASS COMMUN MCQUAIL D, 1972, SOCIOLOGY MASS COMMU, DOI DOI 10.1177/1354856510394539 Microsoft, 2015, MICROSOFT ATTENTION Mull IR, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V33, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.011 Noel NM, 2016, INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF, V14, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.ijme.2016.05.004 Osterman M.D., 2015, THESIS Palmgreen P, 1985, MEDIA GRATIFICATIONS, P61 Perse EM, 1998, J BROADCAST ELECTRON, V42, P435 PERSE EM, 1994, COMMUN RES, V21, P488, DOI 10.1177/009365094021004003 Piaw CY, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V116, P5135, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1087 SALEH A, 2001, COLL STUDENT J, V35, P193 Sheldon P., 2016, P NAT COMM ASS C PHI Sheldon P, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V75, P643, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.009 Sheldon P, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V58, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059 Snyder SM, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0144005 Valdivia A.N., 2003, COMPANION MEDIA STUD, P360 van der Aa N, 2009, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V38, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10964-008-9298-3 Webster JG, 2002, J BROADCAST ELECTRON, V46, P1, DOI 10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_1 Whiting A, 2013, QUAL MARK RES, V16, P362, DOI 10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041 Wright C. R., 1974, USES MASS COMMUNICAT, P197 Wu JH, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P1862, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.033 Yu JJ, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P2682, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.045 NR 50 TC 49 Z9 50 PU MDPI PI BASEL PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND PD AUG PY 2018 VL 10 IS 8 AR 77 DI 10.3390/fi10080077 WC Computer Science, Information Systems SC Computer Science ER PT C AU Albar, AA AF Albar, Ali A. BE Alemneh, DG Allen, J Hawamdeh, S TI Aggression in Cyber Sphere: A Qualitative Study to Explore Saudi Arabian Social Media SO KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA DESIGN INNOVATION SE Series on Innovation and Knowledge Management LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Cyber Aggression; Cyber Bullying; Cyber Stalking; Online Harassment; Cyber Security; Saudi Arabian Social Media; Social Networking Sites ID VICTIMIZATION AB Cyber aggression came about as a result of advances in information communication technology and the aggressive usage of the technology in real life. Nowadays, cyber aggression can take on many forms and faces. However, the main focus of this research is on violent online acts such as bullying and stalking. This qualitative research carried out to explore the concept of cyber aggression and its existence in Saudi Arabia. In-depth interviews were conducted with Saudi social media users to collect understanding and meanings of cyber aggression. A proposed model was generated to describe cyber aggression in Saudi Arabian social media sphere. The results showed that there is a level of acceptance to some cyber aggression acts due to a number of factors including lack of understanding, lack of help and support, societal and traditional influences, and other related aspects that would affect the level of cyber security in social media. This research is a valuable source for educators and researchers who focus on cyber security, cyber psychology, and cyber aggression in social media. C1 [Albar, Ali A.] Yanbu Univ Coll, Coll Yanbu Ind City, Comp Sci & Engn Dept, Madinah, Saudi Arabia. RP Albar, AA (corresponding author), Yanbu Univ Coll, Coll Yanbu Ind City, Comp Sci & Engn Dept, Madinah, Saudi Arabia. EM albara@rcyci.edu.sa CR Akbulut Y, 2011, AUSTRALAS J EDUC TEC, V27, P1155 Al-Salem S. A, 2005, THESIS Al-Zahrani A. M., 2015, WORLD J ED, V5, DOI [10.5430/WJE.V5N3P15, DOI 10.5430/WJE.V5N3P15] Alamri A. A, 2015, ALYAUM NEWS 0830 Aljabre A, 2012, INT J BUSINESS HUMAN, V2, P142 Aljabre A., 2013, ARPN J SCI TECHNOLOG, V3, P161 Almahmoud M. A. S, 2014, THESIS [Anonymous], 1990, HUMAN SCI ACTION SEN Baldry AC, 2003, J ADOLESCENCE, V26, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.07.002 Boyd DM, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V13, P210, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x Chisholm J., 2014, J INFORM SYSTEMS ED, V25, P77 CITC, 2014, ANN REP 2014 COMM IN, P1 Colaizzi P. F., 1978, EXISTENTIAL PHENOMEN, P48 Faryadi Q., 2011, ONLINE SUBMISSION, V1, P23 Fatany S, 2013, AL ARABIYA NEWS Fatany S, 2015, AL ARABIYA NEWS Hinduja S, 2010, ARCH SUICIDE RES, V14, P206, DOI 10.1080/13811118.2010.494133 Holloway I, 2010, QUALITATIVE RES NURS International Monetary Fund, 2015, SAUD AR TOT POP 2010 Internet Services Unit, 2006, LOC CONT FILT PROC Ipsos Global Advisor, 2011, CYBERBULLYING CIT 24 Kowalski R. M., 2012, CYBER BULLYING BULLY Mackenzie N., 2009, J ASS CHARTERED PHYS, V105, P24 Magnussen L, 2008, NURS HEALTH SCI, V10, P125, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2008.00383.x Malki Z, 2015, INT J SCI TECHNOLOGY, V3, P83 Maple C., 2011, CYBERSTALKING UK ANA Miller J. D., 2009, THESIS COLL CHARLEST, P1 Mills Carla, 2004, Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, V21, P112, DOI 10.1017/S0790966700008521 Murphy Caryle, 2012, SAUDI ARABIAS YOUTH Olweus D., 1993, BULLYING SCH OpenNet Initiative, 2004, INT FILT SAUD AR 200 Petersen B, 2011, INFOGRAPHIC SAUDI AR POLIFRONI E, 1999, PERSPECTIVES PHILOS Polit D., 2014, NURSING RES GENERATI, V8th ed., International ed Sabina D, 2010, SOCIAL NETWORKING IL, P1 Shosha GA, 2012, EUROPEAN SCI J, V8, DOI [DOI 10.1038/S41598-017-09255-5, DOI 10.19044/ESJ.2012.V8N27P%25P] Smith J., 2013, INFORM SYSTEMS ED J, V11, P52 Speziale HS, 2011, QUALITATIVE RES NURS Starcevic V, 2015, WORLD PSYCHIATRY, V14, P97, DOI 10.1002/wps.20195 US Department of Health and Human Services, 2011, SURG GEN CALL ACT SU, P1 Whittaker E, 2015, J SCH VIOLENCE, V14, P11, DOI 10.1080/15388220.2014.949377 NR 41 TC 0 Z9 0 PU WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD PI SINGAPORE PA PO BOX 128 FARRER RD, SINGAPORE 9128, SINGAPORE PY 2018 VL 14 BP 145 EP 170 WC Information Science & Library Science SC Information Science & Library Science ER PT J AU Bouckyhckuu, AE AF Bouckyhckuu, A. E. TI Special Theme of the Issue. Cyberpsychology of the New Decade SO PSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF THE HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS LA Russian DT Editorial Material NR 0 TC 0 Z9 0 PU NATL RES UNIV HIGHER EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA NATL RES UNIV HIGHER EDUCATION, MOSCOW, 00000, RUSSIA PY 2021 VL 18 IS 3 BP 429 EP 430 DI 10.17323/1813-8918-2021-3-429-430 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Ellis, DA Davidson, BI Kaye, LK AF Ellis, David A. Davidson, Brittany I. Kaye, Linda K. TI Should Smartphones Be Banned for Children or Does Cyberpsychology Have a Bigger Problem? SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Letter C1 [Ellis, David A.] Univ Lancaster, Dept Psychol, Lancaster LA1 4YF, England. [Davidson, Brittany I.] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Bath, Avon, England. [Kaye, Linda K.] Edge Hill Univ, Dept Psychol, Ormskirk, England. C3 N8 Research Partnership; Lancaster University; University of Bath; Edge Hill University RP Ellis, DA (corresponding author), Univ Lancaster, Dept Psychol, Lancaster LA1 4YF, England. EM d.a.ellis@lancaster.ac.uk CR Elhai JD, 2019, DUNSEN ADAM, V32, P1, DOI 10.14744/DAJPNS.2019.00001 Ellis DA, 2019, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V97, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.006 Jeong YO, 2019, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V97, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.021 Orben A, 2019, NAT HUM BEHAV, V3, P173, DOI 10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1 Panova T, 2018, J BEHAV ADDICT, V7, P252, DOI 10.1556/2006.7.2018.49 Twenge JM., STOP DEBATING WHETHE UK Parliament, SCI TECHN COMM IMP S Wiederhold BK, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P1, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2018.29135.bkw Wiederhold BK, 2015, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V18, P309, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2015.29001.bkw NR 9 TC 3 Z9 3 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD JUL 1 PY 2019 VL 22 IS 7 BP 508 EP 509 DI 10.1089/cyber.2019.29152.lte WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Castleman, WA AF Castleman, Wendy A. TI CYBERPSYCHOLOGY: AN INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION SO APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Book Review CR Lehto M. R., 2007, INTRO HUMAN FACTORS Norman D.A., 1988, PSYCHOL EVERYDAY THI NORMAN KL, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY AN I SIMON AE, 2005, SCH ADM, V62, P10 Wickens CD., 2013, INTRO HUMAN FACTORS, V11, P393 NR 5 TC 0 Z9 0 PU JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD PI CHICHESTER PA THE ATRIUM, SOUTHERN GATE, CHICHESTER PO19 8SQ, W SUSSEX, ENGLAND PD MAY PY 2010 VL 24 IS 4 BP 595 EP 596 DI 10.1002/acp.1622 WC Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Dedkova, L Smahel, D Daneback, K AF Dedkova, Lenka Smahel, David Daneback, Kristian TI Editorial: Cyberpsychology has more submissions and citations SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL RESEARCH ON CYBERSPACE LA English DT Editorial Material C1 [Dedkova, Lenka; Smahel, David; Daneback, Kristian] Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Brno, Czech Republic. [Smahel, David; Daneback, Kristian] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Social Work, Gothenburg, Sweden. C3 Masaryk University Brno; University of Gothenburg RP Dedkova, L (corresponding author), Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Brno, Czech Republic. EM ldedkova@fss.muni.cz; smahel@fss.muni.cz; kristian.daneback@socwork.gu.se NR 0 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MASARYKOVA UNIV, FAC SOCIAL STUDIES PI BRNO PA JOSTOVA 10, BRNO, 602 00, CZECH REPUBLIC PD JUL PY 2016 VL 10 IS 2 AR 1 DI 10.5817/CP2016-2-1 WC Communication; Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Communication; Psychology ER PT J AU Guitton, MJ AF Guitton, Matthieu J. TI Lessons from a crisis: The future of cyberpsychology SO COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR LA English DT Editorial Material C1 [Guitton, Matthieu J.] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada. [Guitton, Matthieu J.] CERVO Brain Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada. C3 Laval University RP Guitton, MJ (corresponding author), Univ Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand Vandry,Room 4889,1050 Ave Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada. EM matthieu.guitton@fmed.ulaval.ca NR 0 TC 1 Z9 1 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD DEC PY 2021 VL 125 AR 106978 DI 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106978 EA AUG 2021 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT C AU Boss-Victoria, R Jordan, TL Richardson, A Aubrey, H Johnson, M Cameron, E Swanson, H AF Boss-Victoria, Rena Jordan, Tina L. Richardson, Agnes Aubrey, Hal Johnson, Maurice Cameron, Elijah Swanson, Henry BE Chova, LG Martinez, AL Torres, IC TI CYBERPSYCHOLOGY REVISITED: CRITICAL ISSUES THAT IMPACT MENTAL HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT IN COMMUNITIES OF COLOR SO EDULEARN19: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES SE EDULEARN Proceedings LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Cyberpsychology; education attainment; mental health; communities of color AB Cyberpsychology is an emerging area of research and practice. According to Howard and Jaynes (2015), "Cyberpsychology" is a recently emergent field that examines the impact of technology upon human cognition and behavior". Much of the existing research literature that has been published over the past twenty years is grounded in the psychological study of human addictive behavior (Norman, 2017). Obviously, the former observation is one of the core functional areas in the research and practice of mental health. Mental Health care in communities of color remain one of the critical healthcare disparities. Further, mental healthcare disparities are intractably associated with educational attainment disparities in communities of color. The observed interconnectivity of mental healthcare disparities and educational attainment disparities must be approached in a more collective effort. Therefore, no serious discussion can take place to address educational attainment disparities without acknowledging the central role of mental healthcare disparities in the larger space of educational attainment disparities. Consequently, this paper represents an exploration of the critical impact of Cyberpsychology on the interconnectivity of persistence mental health and educational attainment disparities in communities of color. C1 [Boss-Victoria, Rena; Jordan, Tina L.] Bowie State Univ, Bowie, MD 20715 USA. [Richardson, Agnes] Delaware State Univ, Dover, DE USA. [Aubrey, Hal] Lincoln Univ Penn, Lincoln Univ, PA USA. [Johnson, Maurice] Morgan State Univ, Baltimore, MD 21239 USA. [Cameron, Elijah; Swanson, Henry] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA. C3 University System of Maryland; Bowie State University; Delaware State University; Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE); Lincoln University - Pennsylvania; Morgan State University; University System of Georgia; Georgia Institute of Technology RP Boss-Victoria, R (corresponding author), Bowie State Univ, Bowie, MD 20715 USA. CR Adabzadeh A., 2013, THESIS CAPELLA U Choi D., 2014, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, P11 Fox J, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P3, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0288 Fuster H, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P292, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2013.0349 Greenhow C, 2017, EDUC INF TECHNOL, V22, P623, DOI 10.1007/s10639-015-9446-9 Gunia BC, 2011, J APPL PSYCHOL, V96, P774, DOI 10.1037/a0021986 Hobbs R, 2004, AM BEHAV SCI, V48, P42, DOI 10.1177/0002764204267250 Keten S, 2012, J MECH BEHAV BIOMED, V5, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.017 Lauricella AR, 2010, J APPL DEV PSYCHOL, V31, P362, DOI 10.1016/j.appdev.2010.06.002 Lin LY, 2016, DEPRESS ANXIETY, V33, P323, DOI 10.1002/da.22466 Norman KL, 2017, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY INTR, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781316212554 NR 11 TC 0 Z9 0 PU IATED-INT ASSOC TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT PI VALENICA PA LAURI VOLPI 6, VALENICA, BURJASSOT 46100, SPAIN PY 2019 BP 7641 EP 7644 WC Education & Educational Research SC Education & Educational Research ER PT J AU Tolstykh, NN AF Tolstykh, Natalia N. TI Foreword by the Editor SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIETY LA Russian DT Editorial Material AB We continue our discussion of cyberpsychology, which we started in our previous issue, the fourth issue of 2019. We received so many articles on cyberpsychology that even with our rigorous selection process, we could not fit all the articles into one issue. Hence we made a decision to devote another issue to this topic. C1 [Tolstykh, Natalia N.] Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Int Sci Publicat Social Psychol & Soc, Moscow, Russia. C3 Moscow State University of Psychology & Education RP Tolstykh, NN (corresponding author), Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Int Sci Publicat Social Psychol & Soc, Moscow, Russia. EM nnvt@list.ru NR 0 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MOSCOW STATE UNIV PSYCHOLOGY & EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2020 VL 11 IS 1 BP 5 EP 7 DI 10.17759/sps.2020110101 WC Psychology, Applied SC Psychology ER PT J AU Maceviciute, E AF Maceviciute, Elena TI Cyberpsychology as everyday digital experience across the lifespan SO INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL LA English DT Book Review C1 [Maceviciute, Elena] Univ Boras, Swedish Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Boras, Sweden. C3 University of Boras RP Maceviciute, E (corresponding author), Univ Boras, Swedish Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Boras, Sweden. CR Harley D., 2018, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY EVER NR 1 TC 0 Z9 0 PU UNIV SHEFFIELD DEPT INFORMATION STUDIES PI SHEFFIELD PA UNIV SHEFFIELD, WESTERN BANK, SHEFFIELD S10 2TN, S YORKS, ENGLAND PD DEC PY 2018 VL 23 IS 4 AR R649 WC Information Science & Library Science SC Information Science & Library Science ER PT J AU Smahel, D Dedkova, L Daneback, K Walrave, M Schouten, A AF Smahel, David Dedkova, Lenka Daneback, Kristian Walrave, Michel Schouten, Alexander TI A breakthrough year for Cyberpsychology: More citations, more submissions - and more impact SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL RESEARCH ON CYBERSPACE LA English DT Editorial Material C1 [Smahel, David; Dedkova, Lenka] Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Brno, Czech Republic. [Daneback, Kristian] Univ Gothenburg, Fac Social Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden. [Walrave, Michel] Univ Antwerp, Dept Commun Studies, Antwerp, Belgium. [Schouten, Alexander] Tilburg Univ, Dept Commun & Cognit, Tilburg, Netherlands. C3 Masaryk University Brno; University of Gothenburg; University of Antwerp; Tilburg University RP Smahel, D (corresponding author), Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Brno, Czech Republic. EM smahel@fss.muni.cz; ldedkova@fss.muni.cz; kristian.daneback@socwork.gu.se; michel.walrave@uantwerpen.be; a.p.schouten@atilburguniversity.edu NR 0 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MASARYKOVA UNIV, FAC SOCIAL STUDIES PI BRNO PA JOSTOVA 10, BRNO, 602 00, CZECH REPUBLIC PY 2019 VL 13 IS 1 DI 10.5817/CP2019-1-xx WC Communication; Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Communication; Psychology ER PT J AU Riva, G Wiederhold, BK AF Riva, Giuseppe Wiederhold, Brenda K. TI How Cyberpsychology and Virtual Reality Can Help Us to Overcome the Psychological Burden of Coronavirus SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Editorial Material ID PLACE C1 [Riva, Giuseppe] IRCCS Ist Auxol Italiano, Appl Technol Neuropsychol Lab, Milan, Italy. [Riva, Giuseppe] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Psychol, Largo Gemelli 1, I-20123 Milan, Italy. [Wiederhold, Brenda K.] Virtual Real Med Ctr, La Jolla, CA USA. [Wiederhold, Brenda K.] Virtual Real Med Inst, Brussels, Belgium. C3 IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart RP Riva, G (corresponding author), Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Psychol, Largo Gemelli 1, I-20123 Milan, Italy. EM giuseppe.riva@unicatt.it CR Bastos AF, 2016, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V302, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.01.043 Li BJ, 2017, FRONT PSYCHOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02116 Moser EI, 2017, NAT NEUROSCI, V20, P1448, DOI 10.1038/nn.4653 Riva G, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P82, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2017.29099.gri Robertson CE, 2016, CURR BIOL, V26, P2463, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.002 Scannell L, 2017, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V51, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.001 Silk J, 1999, ENVIRON PLANN A, V31, P5 Wiederhold BK, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P67, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2011.1533 NR 8 TC 32 Z9 32 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD MAY 1 PY 2020 VL 23 IS 5 BP 277 EP 279 DI 10.1089/cyber.2020.29183.gri EA APR 2020 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT C AU Albar, AA AF Albar, Ali A. GP IEEE TI Development of Scales to Measure the Level of Aggression in Saudi Cyber Sphere SO 2018 21ST SAUDI COMPUTER SOCIETY NATIONAL COMPUTER CONFERENCE (NCC) LA English DT Proceedings Paper ID COEFFICIENT-ALPHA AB Cyber aggression is a new term in our digital era, and it includes diverse online aggressive acts. Cyber aggression can be found in many forms; however, the main focus in this study is cyberbullying and cyberstalking acts. Previous studies focused on understanding the causes and effects of physical and digital aggression in different settings and have shown strong relationships between cyber aggression and the physiological and physical influences on both offenders and victims. Nevertheless, the literature shows a lack of research that could measure the level of acceptance and tolerance of these destructive cyber acts. This study focused on developing measurable scales with reliable items to determine the level of acceptability and tolerability of cyber aggression acts. The researcher used factors discovered in the literature to create the scales' items. The developed scales were analyzed and tested to increase reliability as indicated by the Cronbach's Alpha value. The scales were designed to measure how acceptable and tolerable is cyberbullying and cyberstalking in Saudi Arabia. The results show a strong tolerance level of cyber aggression activities, on the other hand, high acceptance was absent. The study added new scales to the literature, and they could be valuable measurement tools for researchers who focus on cyber aggression, cyber security, cyber psychology, and online aggressive behaviors. C1 [Albar, Ali A.] Yanbu Univ Coll, Comp Sci & Engn Dept, Yanbu Ind City, Saudi Arabia. RP Albar, AA (corresponding author), Yanbu Univ Coll, Comp Sci & Engn Dept, Yanbu Ind City, Saudi Arabia. EM albara@rcyci.edu.sa CR Al-Zahrani A. M., 2015, WORLD J ED, V5, DOI [10.5430/WJE.V5N3P15, DOI 10.5430/WJE.V5N3P15] Albar A. A., 2017, AGGRESSION CYBER SPH, P145, DOI DOI 10.1142/9789813234482_0008 Alsweel R. A., 2013, THESIS [Anonymous], 2015, STAT SOC MED SAUD AR BANDURA A, 1978, J COMMUN, V28, P12, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x Brown J.D., 2009, SHIKEN JALT TESTING, V13, P20, DOI DOI 10.1016/0147-1767(92)90031-0 Chisholm J., 2014, J INFORM SYSTEMS ED, V25, P77 CITC, 2014, ANN REP 2014 COMM IN, P1 Colaizzi P. F., 1978, EXISTENTIAL PHENOMEN, P48 Cook CR, 2007, NASP COMMUNIQUE, V36, P4 CRONBACH LJ, 1955, PSYCHOL BULL, V52, P281, DOI 10.1037/h0040957 Cross D, 2009, AUSTR COVERT BULLYIN Dooley JJ, 2009, Z PSYCHOL, V217, P182, DOI 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182 Faryadi Q., 2011, ONLINE SUBMISSION, V1, P23 Field A., 2009, DISCOVERING STAT USI, V3rd ed., DOI DOI 10.1001/JAMA.271.9.703.34 Hinduja S., 2014, BULLYING SCHOOLYARD Hinduja S, 2010, ARCH SUICIDE RES, V14, P206, DOI 10.1080/13811118.2010.494133 HINKIN TR, 1995, J MANAGE, V21, P967, DOI 10.1016/0149-2063(95)90050-0 Hutcheson G. D., 1999, MULTIVARIATE SOCIAL Ipsos Global Advisor, 2011, CYBERBULLYING CIT 24 Ito M., 2010, HANGING OUT MESSING Juvonen J, 2008, J SCHOOL HEALTH, V78, P496, DOI 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x Kim J., 1978, INTRO FACTOR ANAL WH Maple C., 2011, CYBERSTALKING UK ANA Mills Carla, 2004, Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, V21, P112, DOI 10.1017/S0790966700008521 O'Keeffe GS, 2011, PEDIATRICS, V127, P800, DOI 10.1542/peds.2011-0054 Pallant J., 2013, SPSS SURVIVAL MANUAL, V5th, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781003117452 Rattray J, 2007, J CLIN NURS, V16, P234, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x SCHMITT N, 1985, APPL PSYCH MEAS, V9, P367, DOI 10.1177/014662168500900405 Shullich R., 2011, RISK ASSESSMENT SOCI, V1, P1 Smith J., 2013, INFORM SYSTEMS ED J, V11, P52 Starcevic V., 2015, MENTAL HLTH DIGITAL Starcevic V, 2015, WORLD PSYCHIATRY, V14, P97, DOI 10.1002/wps.20195 Streiner DL, 2003, J PERS ASSESS, V80, P3, DOI 10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_01 Wong-Lo M, 2011, PREV SCH FAIL, V55, P64, DOI 10.1080/1045988X.2011.539429 Yurdugul H, 2008, HACET UNIV EGIT FAK, P397 Zweig J. M., 2013, 2010WGBX003 URB I JU NR 37 TC 0 Z9 0 PU IEEE PI NEW YORK PA 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA PY 2018 WC Computer Science, Theory & Methods SC Computer Science ER PT J AU Ogonowska, A AF Ogonowska, Agnieszka TI (CYBER) PSYCHOLOGICAL AND MEDIA DETERMINANTS OF ONLINE INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOTHERAPY SO PSYCHOTERAPIA LA Polish DT Article AB The aim of the article is to show the determinants of online psychotherapy in the context of contemporary research in the field of media psychology, cyber psychology, and communication. It draws attention to the possibilities and limitations of this form of psychotherapy, based on miniaturized electronic communication, virtual environment, friendly interfaces, and artificial intelligence. An important role in the effectiveness of this form of psychotherapy is also played by the attitudes, experience, and biological age of therapists and the level of their media and digital competence. In relation to clients/patients, it is also important to have experience with the network's environment and the type of expectations that they associate with this form of psychological and psychotherapeutic services. These phenomena are the aftermath of civilization changes related to the dynamic development of digital media (interactive, hypertext, virtual) that enable online communication in real time. Attributes of contemporary media civilization also influence the forms and strategies of therapeutic interactions and the expectations of clients/patients. Describing the specificity of electronic communication in psychotherapy, the author of the article also used references to media archeology.This made it possible to show in a synthetic summary the predecessor of "online psychotherapy" that influenced contemporary forms of media communication, present in psychological therapy. C1 [Ogonowska, Agnieszka] Uniwersytet Pedag KEN Krakowie, Osrodek Badan Nad Mediami, Krakow, Poland. RP Ogonowska, A (corresponding author), Uniwersytet Pedag KEN Krakowie, Osrodek Badan Nad Mediami, Krakow, Poland. EM agaogonowska@poczta.onet.pl CR Aboujaode E, 2015, WIRTUALNA OSOBOWOSC Aiken M., 2017, THE CYBER EFFECT Barton H., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG, P111 Flood C., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG, P153 Frankl V, 1984, HOMO PATIENTS Greaney J., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG, P86 Grzesiuk L, 2005, PSYCHOTERAPIA PRAKTY Grzesiuk L., 2005, PSYCHOTERAPIA TEORIA Jozefik B, 2011, PSYCHIATR POL, V45, P737 Kim A.J., 2006, COMMUNITY BUILDING W Kirwan G., 2016, INTRO CYBEPSYCHOLOGY, P124 Kulesza W, 2017, EFEKT KAMELEONA PSYC Leathers D. G., 2007, KOMUNIKACJA NIEWERBA Lisowska-Magdziarz M, 2013, MEDIA KULTURA TRANSF McDonnel D, 2014, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY NEW Mucha J, 1992, COOLEY, P42 Ogonowska A, GERONTOLOGOPEDIA ASP Ogonowska A, 2014, KOMUNIKACJA POROZUMI OGONOWSKA A, 2013, WSPOLCZESNA EDUKACJA Ogonowska A, 2018, PSYCHOL MEDIOW KOMUN Ogonowska A, 2016, CZLOWIEK I MEDIUM Palmer M., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG, P31 Pasikowska A, 2013, WSPOLCZESNA PSYCHOL Pennbaker JW, 2018, TERAPIA PRZEZ PISANI Pinker S, 2015, EFEKT WIOSKI JAK KON Ptaszek G, 2014, CZLOWIEK TECHNOLOGIA Reeves B, 2004, MEDIA I LUDZIE Stras-Romanowska M, 2010, BADANIA NARRACYJNE P Suler J.R., 2016, PSYCHOL DIGITAL AGE Tomasello M, 2005, KULTUROWE ZRODLA LUD Turkle S, 2013, SAMOTNI RAZEM DLACZE Turkle S, 2007, INTERACT STUD, V8, P501 NR 32 TC 0 Z9 0 PU POLISH PSYCHIATRIC ASSOC PI KRAKOW PA UL LENARTOWICZA 14, KRAKOW, 31138, POLAND PY 2018 IS 3 BP 65 EP 79 WC Psychiatry SC Psychiatry ER PT J AU Tordo, F AF Tordo, F. TI Cyberpsychology of chronic and somatic Patients: for a Clinic of the Patient's Relation to Technology SO PSYCHO-ONCOLOGIE LA French DT Article DE cyberpsychology; chronic disease; somatic disease; technology AB The author addresses the clinical axes identified when the patient with a chronic and somatic disease wears (permanently) technological equipment: 1) plastic modification of the body image; 2) integration fantasies; 3) disturbance of the body image, and its paradoxical recovery with technology; 4) break-in of psychic envelopes; 5) the problem of belonging to one's own body; and 6) finally, use of technology as a psychic prosthesis. C1 [Tordo, F.] 2 Ave Caroline,Ave Caroline, F-92210 St Cloud, France. RP Tordo, F (corresponding author), 2 Ave Caroline,Ave Caroline, F-92210 St Cloud, France. EM frederic.tordo@gmail.com CR Andrieu B, 2013, HUMAIN AUGMENTE, P113 Anzieu D., 1984, MOI PEAU Berthoz Alain., 2013, VICARIANCE CERVEAU C Brotvinick M, 1998, NATURE, V391, P756 Chapouthier G, 2013, HOMME ANIMAL MACHINE Consoli S, 2006, PEAU AUTRE du Colombier M, 2011, CLINIQUES, V1, P94 Ehrsson HH, 2005, J NEUROSCI, V25, P10564, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0800-05.2005 Guterstam A, 2015, SCI REP-UK, V5, DOI 10.1038/srep09831 Hacking I., 2007, HIST SCI POLITIQUE V, P113 Hoyet L, 2016, FRONT ROBOT AI, V3, DOI 10.3389/frobt.2016.00027 Morin C, 2013, NEUROLOGIE PSYCHANAL Reich M, 2008, INFORM PSYCHIAT, V85, P247 Tisseron S, 2017, NOUVELLES MEDIATIONS Tordo F., 2019, MOI CYBORG PSYCHANAL Tordo F, 2019, PSYCHIAT FRANCAISE, V18, P51 NR 16 TC 0 Z9 0 PU LAVOISIER PI CACHAN PA 14, RUE DE PROVIGNY, 94236 CACHAN, FRANCE PD MAR-JUN PY 2020 VL 14 IS 1-2 BP 12 EP 16 DI 10.3166/pson-2020-0112 WC Oncology; Psychology SC Oncology; Psychology ER PT J AU Elhai, JD Rozgonjuk, D AF Elhai, Jon D. Rozgonjuk, Dmitri TI Editorial overview: Cyberpsychology: reviews of research on the intersection between computer technology use and human behavior SO CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Editorial Material ID MENTAL-HEALTH-CARE; VIRTUAL-REALITY; INTEGRATION; PRIVACY; ANXIETY C1 [Elhai, Jon D.] Univ Toledo, Dept Psychol, 2801 West Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA. [Elhai, Jon D.] Univ Toledo, Dept Psychiat, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH 43614 USA. [Rozgonjuk, Dmitri] Ulm Univ, Inst Psychol & Educ, Dept Mol Psychol, D-89081 Ulm, Germany. [Rozgonjuk, Dmitri] Univ Tartu, Inst Math & Stat, Narva Mnt 18, EE-51009 Tartu, Estonia. C3 University System of Ohio; University of Toledo; University System of Ohio; University of Toledo; Ulm University; University of Tartu RP Elhai, JD (corresponding author), Univ Toledo, Dept Psychol, 2801 West Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA.; Elhai, JD (corresponding author), Univ Toledo, Dept Psychiat, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH 43614 USA. CR Anderson PL, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.10.001 [Anonymous], 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, DOI DOI 10.1056/NEJMOA2001316 Attrill-Smith A., 2019, OXFORD HDB CYBERPSYC Baloglu M, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.008 Baumeister H, 2020, DIGITAL PHENOTYPING Bazarova NN, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.004 Brand M, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.006 Chen J, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.006 Cheng C, 2019, PSYCHOL BULL, V145, P734, DOI 10.1037/bul0000198 Crompton H, 2018, COMPUT EDUC, V123, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007 Crompton H, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.011 D'Alfonso S, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.005 Dwivedi YK, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.008 Elhai JD, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.002 Elhai JD, 2017, INTERNET RES, V27, P631, DOI 10.1108/IntR-03-2016-0070 Elhai JD, 2017, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V207, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030 Fletcher TL, 2018, CURR PSYCHIAT REP, V20, DOI 10.1007/s11920-018-0922-y Hall JA, 2019, INFORM COMMUN SOC, V22, P1396, DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1430162 Huckvale K, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.008 Hussain Z, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.007 Ismail LI, 2019, INT J SOC ROBOT, V11, P389, DOI 10.1007/s12369-018-0508-1 Kircaburun K, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.004 Kushlev K, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.001 Lustgarten SD, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.012 Machackova H, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.003 McKibbin W, 2020, EC TIME COVID 19 Montag C, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.013 Norman KL, 2017, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY INTR, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781316212554 Rasool A, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.003 Scott GG, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.005 Sheridan TB, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.01.003 Shneiderman B., 2016, DESIGNING USER INTER, Vsixth Sindermann C, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.014 Tausczik Y, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.009 Van Laethem M, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01808 Van Ouytsel J, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.007 Vasser M, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.010 Verduyn P, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.002 Xiang YT, 2020, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V7, P228, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8 NR 39 TC 1 Z9 1 PU ELSEVIER PI AMSTERDAM PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS PD DEC PY 2020 VL 36 BP IV EP VII DI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.11.001 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Debb, SM AF Debb, Scott M. TI Keeping the Human in the Loop: Awareness and Recognition of Cybersecurity Within Cyberpsychology SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Editorial Material ID ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE C1 [Debb, Scott M.] Norfolk State Univ, Dept Psychol, Grad Fac, Virginia Consortium Program Clin Psychol, 700 Pk Ave,BMH216-11, Norfolk, VA 23504 USA. C3 Norfolk State University RP Debb, SM (corresponding author), Norfolk State Univ, Dept Psychol, Grad Fac, Virginia Consortium Program Clin Psychol, 700 Pk Ave,BMH216-11, Norfolk, VA 23504 USA. EM smdebb@nsu.edu CR Alhayani B., 2021, MATER TODAY-PROC, DOI [10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.531, DOI 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.02.531] Arquilla J, 2021, COMMUN ACM, V64, P10, DOI 10.1145/3464931 Breitinger F, 2020, COMPUT SECUR, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2019.101647 Butler D, 2016, NATURE, V530, P399, DOI 10.1038/530398a Debb S.M., 2020, INT J CYBERSECURITY, V3, P42, DOI DOI 10.52306/03010420GXUV5876 Dobson JE., 2021, URBAN BOOK SERIES Geluvaraj B, 2019, LECT NOTE DATA ENG, V15, P739, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-8681-6_67 Given-Wilson T, 2020, IEEE INT CONF INDUST, P1199, DOI 10.1109/ICIT45562.2020.9067154 Khisamova ZI, 2019, INT J CYBER CRIMINOL, V13, P564, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3709267 McPhail T. L., 2020, GLOBAL COMMUNICATION, V5th ed. National Public Radio, 2021, WORST NIGHTMARE CYBE Rogers R., 1983, SOCIAL PSYCHOPHYSIOL, P153, DOI DOI 10.1093/DEAFED/ENT031 ROGERS RW, 1975, J PSYCHOL, V91, P93, DOI 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 ROSENSTOCK IM, 1988, HEALTH EDUC QUART, V15, P175, DOI 10.1177/109019818801500203 Sanger DE., 2021, PIPELINE ATTACK YIEL Wallace P., 2015, PSYCHOL INTERNET, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139940962 Welker T, 2021, INT J COMMUNICATIONS, V14, P47 Wellman B, 2005, COMMUN ACM, V48, P53, DOI 10.1145/1089107.1089137 Willett M, 2021, SURVIVAL, V63, P7, DOI 10.1080/00396338.2021.1906001 Zeadally S, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P23817, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968045 NR 20 TC 1 Z9 1 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD SEP 1 PY 2021 VL 24 IS 9 BP 581 EP 583 DI 10.1089/cyber.2021.29225.sde WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Bouchard, S Robillard, G Dumoulin, S AF Bouchard, Stephane Robillard, Genevieve Dumoulin, Stephanie TI Is Presence in a Physical Environment Influenced by Arousal and Attention? A Study Conducted on Researchers in Cyberpsychology SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR LA English DT Meeting Abstract EM stephane.bouchard@uqo.ca NR 0 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD FEB PY 2009 VL 12 IS 1 BP 99 EP 99 WC Communication; Psychology, Applied SC Communication; Psychology ER PT C AU Raywood-Burke, G Bishop, LM Asquith, PM Morgan, PL AF Raywood-Burke, George Bishop, Laura M. Asquith, Phoebe M. Morgan, Phillip L. BE Moallem, A TI Human Individual Difference Predictors in Cyber-Security: Exploring an Alternative Scale Method and Data Resolution to Modelling Cyber Secure Behavior SO HCI FOR CYBERSECURITY, PRIVACY AND TRUST (HCI-CPT 2021) SE Lecture Notes in Computer Science LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Cyber-security behavior; Individual differences; Visual Analogue Scale ID PLANNED BEHAVIOR; INFORMATION; MOTIVATION; PRIVACY AB With the increase in reliance upon technology in our everyday lives, users are more vulnerable than ever to cybercrime and data security breaches. Whilst it is important, and valued, to develop technology-based interventions to mitigate this risk, it is also important to consider the impact of human error on cyber safety, and how this can be measured. Data collected from a diverse sample of 189 participants using an alternative measurement scale to more traditional Likert scales, the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), was adopted for previously researched measures of individual differences (age, gender, education level, personality, decision-making style, risk-taking preferences, acceptance of the internet, and related Theory of Planned Behavior and Protection-Motivation Theory concepts) to expand understanding of the relationships between individual differences and user-end cybersecurity behaviors, and explore the significance of this alternative measure in the field of Cyber Psychology. Findings demonstrate the use of VAS can be a reliable and valid method capable of identifying a variety of potential human vulnerabilities and strengths on an individual level. These findings highlight the importance of considering a human-centered approach to cyber-security, and future research should consider then importance of these individual differences in tailoring practical interventions. C1 [Raywood-Burke, George; Bishop, Laura M.; Asquith, Phoebe M.; Morgan, Phillip L.] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Human Factors Excellence Res Grp, Tower Bldg,70 Pk Pl, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales. [Raywood-Burke, George; Bishop, Laura M.; Asquith, Phoebe M.; Morgan, Phillip L.] Airbus Cent R&T, Celt Springs Business Pk, Newport NP10 8FZ, Gwent, Wales. C3 RLUK- Research Libraries UK; Cardiff University RP Raywood-Burke, G; Bishop, LM; Asquith, PM; Morgan, PL (corresponding author), Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Human Factors Excellence Res Grp, Tower Bldg,70 Pk Pl, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales.; Raywood-Burke, G; Bishop, LM; Asquith, PM; Morgan, PL (corresponding author), Airbus Cent R&T, Celt Springs Business Pk, Newport NP10 8FZ, Gwent, Wales. EM raywood-burkeg@cardiff.ac.uk; bishoplm2@cardiff.ac.uk; asquithpm@cardiff.ac.uk; morganphil@cardiff.ac.uk FU School of Psychology at Cardiff University FX This research was supported through an Endeavr Wales funded PhD studentship awarded to the first author (George Raywood-Burke) from the School of Psychology at Cardiff University. Other support was provided by Airbus where the PhD student is a member of the Airbus Accelerator in Human-Centric Cyber Security team, under the Technical Leadership of the fourth author (Professor Phillip Morgan) who is also George Raywood-Burke's PhD Lead Supervisor. CR Ajzen I, 2011, PSYCHOL HEALTH, V26, P1113, DOI 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995 Bishop Laura M., 2020, HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust. Second International Conference, HCI-CPT 2020 Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 12210), P51, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-50309-3_4 Blais AR, 2006, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V1, P33 Chowdhury A., 2019, BEHAV INFO TECHNOL, DOI [10.1080/0144929X.2019.1583769, DOI 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1583769] CybSafe, 2020, HUM ERR BLAM 9 10 UK Dykstra J., 2018, 11 USENIX WORKSH CYB Egelman S, 2015, CHI 2015: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P2873, DOI 10.1145/2702123.2702249 Gratian M, 2018, COMPUT SECUR, V73, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2017.11.015 Gupta M, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P34564, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975142 IBM Security Services, 2014, CYB SEC INT IND Leonard TC, 2008, CONST POLITICAL ECON, V19, P356, DOI 10.1007/s10602-008-9056-2 Okamoto T, 2015, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V60, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.211 Parsons KM, 2015, J COGN ENG DECIS MAK, V9, P117, DOI 10.1177/1555343415575152 Patton JH, 1995, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V51, P768, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>3.0.CO;2-1 Posey C, 2015, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V32, P179, DOI 10.1080/07421222.2015.1138374 Reips UD, 2008, BEHAV RES METHODS, V40, P699, DOI 10.3758/BRM.40.3.699 Riquelme IP, 2014, ELECTRON MARK, V24, P135, DOI 10.1007/s12525-013-0145-3 Safa NS, 2015, COMPUT SECUR, V53, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2015.05.012 SCOTT SG, 1995, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V55, P818, DOI 10.1177/0013164495055005017 Shappie AT, 2020, PSYCHOL POP MEDIA, V9, P475, DOI 10.1037/ppm0000247 Singh S, 2009, INT J COMPUT SCI NET, V9, P1 Sommestad T, 2015, INF COMPUT SECUR, V23, P200, DOI 10.1108/ICS-04-2014-0025 Thaler RH, 2003, AM ECON REV, V93, P175, DOI 10.1257/000282803321947001 van Bavel R, 2019, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V123, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.11.003 van Schaik P, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V75, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.038 Venkatesh V, 2012, MIS QUART, V36, P157 Wu HP, 2017, J SOC SERV RES, V43, P527, DOI 10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775 NR 27 TC 0 Z9 0 PU SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG PI CHAM PA GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND PY 2021 VL 12788 BP 226 EP 240 DI 10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_15 WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Computer Science, Theory & Methods SC Computer Science ER PT J AU Campbell, LF Norcross, JC AF Campbell, Linda F. Norcross, John C. TI Do you see what we see? Psychology's response to technology in mental health SO CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE LA English DT Editorial Material DE cyberpsychology; ethics; guidelines; psychotherapy; technology; telehealth; telepsychology C1 [Campbell, Linda F.] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA. [Norcross, John C.] Univ Scranton, Scranton, PA 18510 USA. C3 University System of Georgia; University of Georgia; University of Scranton RP Campbell, LF (corresponding author), Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA. EM lcampbel@uga.edu CR American Psychological Association, 2017, COD ETH COND RES TEA Campbell L. F., 2018, TELEPSYCHOLOGY CASEB, DOI [10.1037/0000046-000, DOI 10.1037/0000046-000] Joint Task Force Dev Telepsycholog, 2013, AM PSYCHOL, V68, P791, DOI 10.1037/a0035001 Lustgarten SD, 2018, CLIN PSYCHOL-SCI PR, V25, DOI 10.1111/cpsp.12234 NR 4 TC 3 Z9 3 PU WILEY PI HOBOKEN PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA PD JUN PY 2018 VL 25 IS 2 AR e12237 DI 10.1111/cpsp.12237 WC Psychology, Clinical SC Psychology ER PT J AU Cognetta, C Bollina, R Toniolo, D Riva, G Belloni, P Cozzi, C Zannier, F della Torre, S Candido, P Corradini, G Bregni, M AF Cognetta, C. Bollina, R. Toniolo, D. Riva, G. Belloni, P. Cozzi, C. Zannier, F. della Torre, S. Candido, P. Corradini, G. Bregni, M. TI Cyberpsychology advantages: A training on a mobile phone to control stress and anxiety in a day hospital oncology nurses' sample SO JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY LA English DT Meeting Abstract C1 Rho Hosp Med Oncol, Rho, Italy. G Salvini Rho Hosp, Milan, Italy. Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, I-20123 Milan, Italy. Rho Hosp Med Oncol, Milan, Italy. Osped San Giuseppe, Milan, Italy. C3 Catholic University of the Sacred Heart NR 0 TC 0 Z9 0 PU AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PI ALEXANDRIA PA 2318 MILL ROAD, STE 800, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 USA PD MAY 20 PY 2011 VL 29 IS 15 SU S MA e16608 DI 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e16608 WC Oncology SC Oncology ER PT J AU Triberti, S Durosini, I Lin, JY La Torre, D Galan, MR AF Triberti, Stefano Durosini, Ilaria Lin, Jianyi La Torre, Davide Ruiz Galan, Manuel TI Editorial: On the "Human" in Human-Artificial Intelligence Interaction SO FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Editorial Material DE artificial intelligence; eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI); human centered AI; human technology interaction; cyberpsychology; attitudes toward technology ID TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; ATTITUDES; AI C1 [Triberti, Stefano; La Torre, Davide] Univ Milan, Dept Oncol & Hematooncol, Milan, Italy. [Triberti, Stefano; Durosini, Ilaria] European Inst Oncol IRCCS, Appl Res Div Cognit & Psychol Sci, IEO, Milan, Italy. [Lin, Jianyi] Univ Cattol Sacro Cuore, Dipt Sci Statist, Milan, Italy. [Lin, Jianyi] Khalifa Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Math, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates. [La Torre, Davide] SKEMA Business Sch & Univ Cote dAzur, Sophia Antipolis Campus, Sophia Antipolis, France. [Ruiz Galan, Manuel] Univ Granada, Dept Appl Math, Granada, Spain. C3 University of Milan; IRCCS European Institute of Oncology (IEO); Catholic University of the Sacred Heart; Khalifa University of Science & Technology; University of Granada RP Triberti, S (corresponding author), Univ Milan, Dept Oncol & Hematooncol, Milan, Italy.; Triberti, S (corresponding author), European Inst Oncol IRCCS, Appl Res Div Cognit & Psychol Sci, IEO, Milan, Italy. EM stefano.triberti@unimi.it FU MIUR-Italian Ministry of University and Research; Fondazione Umberto Veronesi FX ST was supported by MIUR-Italian Ministry of University and Research (Department of Excellence Italian Law n.232, 11th December 2016) for University of Milan. ID was supported by Fondazione Umberto Veronesi. CR Adamo A, 2015, MACH VISION APPL, V26, P837, DOI 10.1007/s00138-015-0694-x Golcher-Barguil LA, 2019, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V30, P682, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2019.1580784 Bodini M, 2018, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V11182, P297, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-01449-0_25 Carr NG, 2003, HARVARD BUS REV, V81, P41 Daroczy G, 2010, P 8 INT C APPL INF dos Santos DP, 2019, EUR RADIOL, V29, P1640, DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1 Gorini A, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02066 Keskinbora KH, 2019, J CLIN NEUROSCI, V64, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.03.001 Knijnenburg BP, 2012, USER MODEL USER-ADAP, V22, P441, DOI 10.1007/s11257-011-9118-4 La Torre D, 2021, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2021.3077195 Lau N, 2020, ERGON DES, V28, P3, DOI 10.1177/1064804620915238 Lisetti C. L., PRAGMAT COGN, V8, P185, DOI DOI 10.1075/PC.8.1.09LIS Marangunic N, 2015, UNIVERSAL ACCESS INF, V14, P81, DOI 10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 Matthews G, 2021, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V169, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2020.109969 Miller T, 2019, ARTIF INTELL, V267, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 Nunes A, 2019, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02791 Oksanen A, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568256 Pravettoni G., 2015, TELE ONCOLOGY TELE H, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16378-9_2, 10.1007/978-3-319-16378-9_2] Schepman Astrid, 2020, Comput Hum Behav Rep, V1, P100014, DOI 10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014 Sebri V, 2020, ANN REV CYBERTHERAPY, V18, P229 Sharan NN, 2020, HELIYON, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04572 Triberti S, 2020, PUBLIC HEALTH GENOM, V23, P2, DOI 10.1159/000506014 Triberti S, 2020, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00117 Triberti S, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V64, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.044 Tuena C., 2022, REFERENCE MODULE NEU Venkatesh V, 2000, MANAGE SCI, V46, P186, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 Weller AJ, 2019, SHE JI, V5, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.sheji.2019.11.015 NR 27 TC 3 Z9 3 PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA PI LAUSANNE PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND PD DEC 24 PY 2021 VL 12 AR 808995 DI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.808995 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Bayer, JB Reinecke, L Vanden Abeele, MMP AF Bayer, Joseph B. Reinecke, Leonard Vanden Abeele, Mariek M. P. TI Psychological perspectives on mobile media: A flyover review SO MOBILE MEDIA & COMMUNICATION LA English DT Review DE mobile technology; psychology; cyberpsychology; smartphones; phones; devices; apps; effects ID SMARTPHONE USE; APP; ATTACHMENT; FACEBOOK; IMPACT C1 [Bayer, Joseph B.] Ohio State Univ, Sch Commun, Columbus, OH USA. [Bayer, Joseph B.] Ohio State Univ, Translat Data Analyt Inst, Columbus, OH USA. [Reinecke, Leonard] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Commun, Mainz, Germany. [Vanden Abeele, Mariek M. P.] Univ Ghent, Imec Mict UGent, Ghent, Belgium. [Bayer, Joseph B.] Ohio State Univ, Sch Commun, 154 N Oval Mall, Columbus, OH 43210 USA. C3 University System of Ohio; Ohio State University; University System of Ohio; Ohio State University; Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz; Ghent University; University System of Ohio; Ohio State University RP Bayer, JB (corresponding author), Ohio State Univ, Sch Commun, 154 N Oval Mall, Columbus, OH 43210 USA. EM Bayer.66@osu.edu CR Aalbers G, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P115, DOI 10.1177/2050157921993896 Andersson L, 2021, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V9, P531, DOI 10.1177/2050157920984828 Asante RKB, 2019, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V7, P24, DOI 10.1177/2050157918764015 Bayer J, 2018, NEW MEDIA SOC, V20, P1047, DOI 10.1177/1461444816681522 Bayer JB, 2016, HUM COMMUN RES, V42, P71, DOI 10.1111/hcre.12067 Bayer JB, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P2083, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.012 Beyens I, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-67727-7 Broekman FL, 2018, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V6, P367, DOI 10.1177/2050157918759571 Burgers C, 2016, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V4, P327, DOI 10.1177/2050157916639348 Buttner CM, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P387, DOI 10.1177/20501579211059914 Campbell SW, 2013, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V1, P8, DOI 10.1177/2050157912459495 Campbell SW, 2009, COMMUN SER, P592 Chin K, 2019, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V7, P41, DOI 10.1177/2050157918770696 Corriero EF, 2016, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V4, P121, DOI 10.1177/2050157915614872 Cumiskey KM, 2015, HBK COMMUN MEDIA, P228 Cummings R, 2021, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V9, P274, DOI 10.1177/2050157920958437 Cutino CM, 2017, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V5, P63, DOI 10.1177/2050157916664558 Damasio MJ, 2013, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V1, P335, DOI 10.1177/2050157913495690 Davidson BI, 2022, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107206 Dogruel L, 2021, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V9, P210, DOI 10.1177/2050157920943926 Dogruel L, 2015, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V3, P125, DOI 10.1177/2050157914557509 Ellis DA, 2020, SMARTPHONES PSYCHOL Figeac J, 2018, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V6, P407, DOI 10.1177/2050157917747642 Gonzales AL, 2014, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V2, P233, DOI 10.1177/2050157914530297 Grieve R, 2021, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V9, P195, DOI 10.1177/2050157920942276 Joeckel S, 2020, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V8, P22, DOI 10.1177/2050157918819616 Kadylak T, 2020, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V8, P247, DOI 10.1177/2050157919872238 Kim KJ, 2016, HUM COMMUN RES, V42, P45, DOI 10.1111/hcre.12064 Klenk S, 2017, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V5, P178, DOI 10.1177/2050157917691557 Kuru O, 2017, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V5, P102, DOI 10.1177/2050157916678269 Kushlev K, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.001 Laor T, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P365, DOI 10.1177/20501579211052227 Lemish D, 2020, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V8, P170, DOI 10.1177/2050157919846916 Lin TTC, 2015, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V3, P106, DOI 10.1177/2050157914555426 Liu PL, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P76, DOI 10.1177/20501579211001106 Liu X, 2014, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V2, P318, DOI 10.1177/2050157914535390 Lopez-Gonzalez H, 2021, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V9, P254, DOI 10.1177/2050157920952127 Mascheroni G, 2016, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V4, P310, DOI 10.1177/2050157916639347 Meier A, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P272, DOI 10.1177/20501579211029326 Melumad S, 2020, J CONSUM RES, V47, P237, DOI 10.1093/jcr/ucaa005 Melumad S, 2019, J MARKETING RES, V56, P259, DOI 10.1177/0022243718815429 Muller SR, 2022, ADV METH PRACT PSYCH, V5, DOI 10.1177/25152459221082680 Oh J, 2021, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V9, P314, DOI 10.1177/2050157920958440 Panek ET, 2015, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V3, P383, DOI 10.1177/2050157915576046 Pila S, 2019, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V7, P265, DOI 10.1177/2050157918812224 Poels K, 2022, J MEDIA PSYCHOL-GER, V34, P113, DOI 10.1027/1864-1105/a000340 Radtke T, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P190, DOI 10.1177/20501579211028647 Ranzini G, 2017, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V5, P80, DOI 10.1177/2050157916664559 Rao NM, 2021, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V9, P128, DOI 10.1177/2050157920922262 Reichow D, 2020, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V8, P268, DOI 10.1177/2050157919878759 Rieger D, 2017, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V5, P161, DOI 10.1177/2050157917691556 Rosenberg H, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P216, DOI 10.1177/20501579211033885 Ross MQ, 2021, REV COMMUN RES, V9, P147, DOI 10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.031 Ross MQ, 2021, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V9, P488, DOI 10.1177/2050157920980508 Rozgonjuk D, 2020, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V8, P400, DOI 10.1177/2050157920910190 Sauer VJ, 2015, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V3, P293, DOI 10.1177/2050157914562656 Schneider FM, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P251, DOI 10.1177/20501579211054928 Sewall CJR, 2020, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V8, P379, DOI 10.1177/2050157920902830 Stevic A, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P294, DOI 10.1177/20501579211051820 Thorson E, 2015, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V3, P160, DOI 10.1177/2050157914557692 Valasek CJ, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P235, DOI 10.1177/20501579211038796 Vanden Abeele MMP, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P174, DOI 10.1177/20501579221080899 Wang KX, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P316, DOI 10.1177/20501579211056116 Wei R, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, DOI 10.1177/20501579221110324 Wilmer HH, 2017, FRONT PSYCHOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605 Yeo TED, 2018, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V6, P3, DOI 10.1177/2050157917718601 Zhong L, 2022, MOB MEDIA COMMUN, V10, P448, DOI 10.1177/20501579221077525 NR 67 TC 1 Z9 1 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC PI THOUSAND OAKS PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA PD JAN PY 2023 VL 11 IS 1 SI SI BP 107 EP 117 DI 10.1177/20501579221134369 EA NOV 2022 WC Communication SC Communication ER PT J AU Howard, MC Jayne, BS AF Howard, Matt C. Jayne, Bradley S. TI An Analysis of More Than 1,400 Articles, 900 Scales, and 17 Years of Research: The State of Scales in Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Article ID INCREASE CUSTOMER LOYALTY; MOBILE PHONE USE; VIRTUAL-REALITY; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; ONLINE; RELIABILITY; ADDICTION; FACEBOOK; CREATION; MOTIVES AB Cyberpsychology is a recently emergent field that examines the impact of technology upon human cognition and behavior. Given its infancy, authors have rapidly created new measures to gauge their constructs of interest. Unfortunately, few of these authors have had the opportunity to test their scales' psychometric properties and validity. This is concerning, as many theoretical assumptions may be founded upon scales with inadequate attributes. If this were found to be true, then previous findings in cyberpsychology studies would need to be retested, and future research would need to shift its focus to creating psychometrically sound and valid measures. To provide inferences on this concern, the current study examines the article reporting, scale creation, and scale reliabilities of every article published in Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking from its inception to July 2014. The final data set encompassed the coding of 1,478 individual articles, including 921 scales, and spanning 17 years. The results demonstrate that the simple survey methodology has become more popular over time. Authors are gradually applying empirically tested scales. However, self-created measures are still the most popular, leading to concerns about the measures' validity. Also, the use of multi-item measures has increased over time, but many articles still fail to report adequate information to assess the reliability of the applied scales. Lastly, the average scale reliability is 0.81, which barely meets standard cutoffs. Overall, these results are not overly concerning, but suggestions are given on methods to improve the reporting of measures, the creation of scales, and the state of cyberpsychology. C1 [Howard, Matt C.; Jayne, Bradley S.] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA. C3 Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE); Pennsylvania State University; Pennsylvania State University - University Park RP Howard, MC (corresponding author), Penn State Univ, 142 Moore Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA. EM Mch248@psu.edu CR Baker JR, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P379, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0130 Caligiuri PM, 1998, J APPL PSYCHOL, V83, P598, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.598 Torres JAC, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P43, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0589 Castelnuovo G, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P375, DOI 10.1089/109493103322278754 Chan M, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P345, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0109 Choi DS, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P11, DOI 10.1089/109493104322820066 Chun H, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P473, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0140 CHURCHILL GA, 1979, J MARKETING RES, V16, P64, DOI 10.2307/3150876 Coolidge FL., 2010, CORSINI ENCY PSYCHOL, P1448, DOI [10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy1019, DOI 10.1002/9780470479216.CORPSY1019] Dalbudak E, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P272, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0390 den Hamer A, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P74, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0307 Fico F., 2005, ANAL MEDIA MESSAGES, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410613424 Flynn D, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P591, DOI 10.1089/109493103322725379 Fox J, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P3, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0288 Fuster H, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P292, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2013.0349 Gabbiadini A, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P285, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0412 Galimberti C, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P229, DOI 10.1089/109493103322011506 Grieve R, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P364, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0271 Griffiths MD, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P413, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2009.0062 Guion RM, 2002, VALIDITY RELIABILITY Gunia BC, 2011, J APPL PSYCHOL, V96, P774, DOI 10.1037/a0021986 Guzeller CO, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P205, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2011.0210 Haferkamp N, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P91, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2011.0151 Hawi NS, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P200, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0426 Hedges L., 2009, HDB RES SYNTHESIS ME, V2nd Hollenbaugh EE, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P13, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0403 Holsti O. R., 1969, CONTENT ANAL SOCIAL Howard MC, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P677, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2014.0255 Kim Y, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P160, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0415 Koc M, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P279, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0249 Kowert R, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P141, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2013.0118 Kraut AI, 1996, ORG SURVEYS TOOLS AS Lee J, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P643, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0093 Liu C., 2004, ENCY RES METHODS SOC, P674 Livingstone S, 2008, NEW MEDIA SOC, V10, P393, DOI 10.1177/1461444808089415 Long KR, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P454, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2013.0506 Lopez-Fernandez O, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P91, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0260 Matthews N, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P741, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2009.0050 McKay HG, 2001, DIABETES CARE, V24, P1328, DOI 10.2337/diacare.24.8.1328 Moss P. A., 1994, EDUC RES, V23, P5, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X023002005 Muscanell NL, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P237, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0411 Osburn HG, 2000, PSYCHOL METHODS, V5, P343, DOI 10.1037//1082-989X.5.3.343 Park H, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P265, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0051 PETER JP, 1979, J MARKETING RES, V16, P6, DOI 10.2307/3150868 Pett M.A., 2003, MAKING SENSE FACTOR, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412984898 Rochlen AB, 2004, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V60, P269, DOI 10.1002/jclp.10263 Stachowski AA, 2009, J APPL PSYCHOL, V94, P1536, DOI 10.1037/a0016903 Stanton JM, 2008, HDB RES METHODS IND, P275 Steele E, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P633, DOI 10.1089/109493103322725405 STEUER J, 1992, J COMMUN, V42, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x Su WL, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P497, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0167 Teng CI, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P884, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0182 Tossmann HP, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P673, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0506 Wanous JP, 1996, PSYCHOL REP, V78, P631, DOI 10.2466/pr0.1996.78.2.631 Whitty MT, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P569, DOI 10.1089/109493103322725342 Wirth W, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P260, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0159 Young SD, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P243, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0080 Young SD, 2011, AIDS BEHAV, V15, P253, DOI 10.1007/s10461-010-9810-0 NR 58 TC 13 Z9 14 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD MAR 1 PY 2015 VL 18 IS 3 BP 181 EP 187 DI 10.1089/cyber.2014.0418 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Hughes, N Burke, J AF Hughes, Nicola Burke, Jolanta TI Sleeping with the frenemy: How restricting 'bedroom use' of smartphones impacts happiness and wellbeing SO COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR LA English DT Article DE Smartphone; Social media; Social overload; Subjective wellbeing; Cyber psychology; Positive psychology ID SOCIAL MEDIA; INTERNET ADDICTION; FACEBOOK USAGE; PHONE USE; QUALITY; ASSOCIATION; STRESS; CONSEQUENCES; PERSONALITY; PREVALENCE AB Smartphone technology has dramatically changed the way people interact with the physical and online world. Research shows both positive and negative impacts of smartphone and social platform use. Positive outcomes relate to social capital and engagement, while negative impacts result from compulsive usage, negative comparisons and the stress of being 'always on'. Little evidence is available regarding wellbeing impacts of smartphone use at particular times of day. This study measures the impact of overnight smartphone use on wellbeing. Experimental group participants abstained from smartphone use in the bedroom for one week. The Subjective Happiness Scale, Quality of Life Scale, Smartphone Addiction Scale and Intensity & Time Affect Survey were issued at the beginning and end of the week. Paired sample T-Tests compared pre and post intervention participant surveys scores. It was hypothesised that subjective wellbeing would increase. In three out of four measures (SAS-SV, SHS and QOLS) the hypothesis was upheld, although impacts were relatively small. 93.6% of experimental group participants said they "might' or "would" consider self-imposing intervention conditions moving forward, suggesting that participants experienced greater benefits not measurable through the questionnaires selected. Some qualitative analysis supports exploration of findings. Further research to explore other wellbeing impacts is encouraged. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. C1 [Hughes, Nicola; Burke, Jolanta] Univ East London, Sch Psychol, Stratford Campus,Water Lane, London E15 4LZ, England. C3 University of East London RP Hughes, N (corresponding author), Univ East London, Sch Psychol, Stratford Campus,Water Lane, London E15 4LZ, England. EM nicolajanehughes@hotmail.com CR Al-Harrasi AS., 2014, CONT ISSUES ED RES, V7, P129, DOI [10.19030/cier.v7i2.8483, DOI 10.19030/CIER.V7I2.8483] Andreassen CS, 2012, PSYCHOL REP, V110, P501, DOI 10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517 Bassett SM, 2015, STRESS, V18, P638, DOI 10.3109/10253890.2015.1087503 Best P, 2014, CHILD YOUTH SERV REV, V41, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001 Borrelli J. S., 2015, DIGITAL COMMS GEORGE, V167, P1 Boyd DM, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V13, P210, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x Burckhardt Carol S, 2003, Health Qual Life Outcomes, V1, P60, DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-1-60 Chan M, 2015, NEW MEDIA SOC, V17, P96, DOI 10.1177/1461444813516836 Chellappa SL, 2013, J SLEEP RES, V22, P573, DOI 10.1111/jsr.12050 Chen L, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V55, P856, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.030 Chou HTG, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P117, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2011.0324 Coviello L, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0090315 Csikszentmihalyi M., 2008, FLOW PSYCHOL OPTIMAL DAVIDSON WB, 1991, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V19, P246, DOI 10.1002/1520-6629(199107)19:3<246::AID-JCOP2290190308>3.0.CO;2-L Demirci K, 2015, J BEHAV ADDICT, V4, P85, DOI 10.1556/2006.4.2015.010 DIENER E, 1995, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V69, P130, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.130 Falbe J, 2015, PEDIATRICS, V135, pE367, DOI 10.1542/peds.2014-2306 FLANAGAN JC, 1982, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V63, P56 Fox J, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V45, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.083 Grieve R, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017 Haslam S. A., 2014, RES METHODS STAT PSY Hawi NS, 2016, COMPUT EDUC, V98, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.007 Hoffner CA, 2015, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V18, P411, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2014.0487 Jin B, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P2463, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.034 Kenyon DB, 2011, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V39, P1, DOI 10.1002/jcop.20412 Kramer ADI, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P8788, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1320040111 Kross E, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069841 Kuss DJ, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P1987, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.002 Kuss DJ, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P959, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.024 Kwon M, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558 Lanaj K, 2014, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V124, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.01.001 Lemola S, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0082059, 10.1371/journal.pone.0071292] Lepp A, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V43, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.006 Leung L, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V48, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.068 Levenson JC, 2017, SLEEP, V40, DOI 10.1093/sleep/zsx113 Levenson JC, 2016, PREV MED, V85, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.001 Lyubomirsky S, 1999, SOC INDIC RES, V46, P137, DOI 10.1023/A:1006824100041 Maier C., 2012, P 20 EUR C INF SYST Marsden E., 2016, THERES NO PLACE PHON Mauri M, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P723, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0377 McFarland LA, 2015, J APPL PSYCHOL, V100, P1653, DOI 10.1037/a0039244 Muusses LD, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V36, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.035 Nielsen, 2015, TOPS OF 2015 DIG Ohly S, 2014, J PERS PSYCHOL, V13, P174, DOI 10.1027/1866-5888/a000114 Orzech KM, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V55, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.049 Peiro-Velert C., 2014, PUBLIC LIB SCI, V9, P99478, DOI DOI 10.1371/J0URNAL.P0NE.0099478 Ragu-Nathan TS, 2008, INFORM SYST RES, V19, P417, DOI 10.1287/isre.1070.0165 Ryan T, 2014, J BEHAV ADDICT, V3, P133, DOI 10.1556/JBA.3.2014.016 Samaha M, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V57, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.045 Sapacz M, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V57, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.004 Seidman G, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V31, P367, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.052 Seligman M. E., 2011, FLOURISH Shen ST, 2016, ENG COMPUTATION, V33, P1642, DOI 10.1108/EC-06-2015-0153 Skarupova K, 2016, BEHAV INFORM TECHNOL, V35, P68, DOI 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1114144 Steers MLN, 2014, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V33, P701, DOI 10.1521/jscp.2014.33.8.701 Turkle S., 2011, ALONE TOGETHER WHY W van Deursen AJAM, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V45, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039 Verduyn P, 2015, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V144, P480, DOI 10.1037/xge0000057 Wise K., 2010, J CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BE, V13, P5, DOI 10.1089=cyber.2009.0365 Wood AW, 2006, INT J RADIAT BIOL, V82, P69, DOI 10.1080/09553000600599775 Xanidis N, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V55, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.004 NR 61 TC 37 Z9 38 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD AUG PY 2018 VL 85 BP 236 EP 244 DI 10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.047 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Synnott, J Coulias, A Ioannou, M AF Synnott, John Coulias, Andria Ioannou, Maria TI Online trolling: The case of Madeleine McCann SO COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR LA English DT Article DE Online trolling; Online abuse; Missing persons; Social media; Cyber psychology ID ME AB Despite the sustained media attention surrounding internet trolling, academic studies investigating its occurrence are rare. This study aimed to provide a case study analysis of the behaviours and strategies of a group of alleged Twitter trolls referred to as the anti-McCanns due to their continual abuse of Kate and Gerry McCann as well as those who support them and thus identify as pro-McCann. The way in which language was used to construct the anti-McCanns group identity, enhance in-group cohesion and facilitate out-group disassociation from the pro-Mccann group was additionally explored, given that previous research has implicated group processes in the propagation of aggressive online conduct. A multi-method approach involving a combination of ethnographic observations and the collection of online commentary was employed. The data was then analysed using quantitative content analysis and discourse analysis, which indicated that language was utilised in a variety of ways by the anti-McCanns to construct a salient group identity and negatively stereotype and disassociate from the pro-McCann group. Findings additionally revealed that several strategies were employed by the anti-McCann trolls to provoke and derogate members of the pro-McCann group, supporting previous findings which have linked trolling to both western media culture and the characteristics of anti-social personality disorder. The implications of these findings both theoretical and practical are discussed, alongside recommendations for future research. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. C1 [Synnott, John; Coulias, Andria; Ioannou, Maria] Univ Huddersfield, Int Res Ctr Invest Psychol, Sch Human & Hlth Sci, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England. C3 University of Huddersfield RP Synnott, J (corresponding author), Univ Huddersfield, Int Res Ctr Invest Psychol, Sch Human & Hlth Sci, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England. EM J.P.Synnott@hud.ac.uk; Andria.Coulias@hud.ac.uk; M.Ioannou@hud.ac.uk CR Bishop J., 2013, INT REV LAW COMPUTER, V27, P301, DOI DOI 10.1080/13600869.2013.796706 Bishop J, 2013, INT J CYBER CRIMINOL, V7, P28 Black D., 2000, BAD BOYS BAD MEN CON Bruns Axel, 2011, 6 EUROPEAN CONSORTIU Buckels EE, 2014, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V67, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016 Cale EM, 2002, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V22, P1179, DOI 10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00125-8 Chae B, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V165, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.037 Cho Daegon, 2013, P 12 WORKSH EC INF S Creswell J.W., 2018, QUAL INQ Donath J., 1999, COMMUNITIES CYBERSPA Fiveash K., 2014, TROLL HUNTING CASES Gabriele de Seta, 2013, FIBRECULTURE J, V22, P300 Goc N., 2009, BAD MUMMY KATE MCCAN Goldstein A. P., 2002, PSYCHOL GROUP AGGRES Hardaker C, 2013, J LANG AGGRESS CONFL, V1, P58, DOI 10.1075/jlac.1.1.04har Hardaker C, 2010, J POLITENESS RES-LAN, V6, P215, DOI 10.1515/JPLR.2010.011 Herring S, 2002, INFORM SOC, V18, P371, DOI 10.1080/01972240290108186 Hiltz S.R., 1997, COMMUN ACM, V40, P40, DOI DOI 10.1145/260750.260764 Hine C., 2000, VIRTUAL ETHNOGRAPHY Hornsey MJ, 2008, SOC PERSONAL PSYCHOL, V2, P204, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x Johns M. D., 2004, ONLINE SOCIAL RES Kemp Simon, 2016, DIGITAL 2016 WE ARE Kennedy J, 2010, JOURNALISM STUD, V11, P225, DOI 10.1080/14616700903290635 Kozinets R.V., 2010, MIT TECHNOL REV Lasseter AE, 2003, J FORENSIC SCI, V48, P617 Lea M, 2001, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V27, P526, DOI 10.1177/0146167201275002 Leaver T, 2013, FIBRECULTURE J, V22, P216 Lorenzo-Dus N, 2011, J PRAGMATICS, V43, P2578, DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005 Luzon MJ, 2014, ADV HUM SOC ASPEC T, P235, DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-4426-7.ch011 Machado H, 2009, CRIME MEDIA CULT, V5, P146, DOI 10.1177/1741659009335691 Mal A., 2011, NUJS LAW REV, V4, P299 Markham A. N, 1998, LIFE ONLINE Marwick A., 2013, TWITTER AND SOC Phillips W., 2015, THIS IS WHY WE CANT Phillips W., 2011, 1 MONDAY, V16 Phillips W. M., 2012, THESIS Phillips W, 2013, TELEV NEW MEDIA, V14, P494, DOI 10.1177/1527476412452799 Rehling N., 2012, PSYCHOL POLITICS COL REICHER S, 1995, EUROPEAN REV SOCIAL Shachaf P, 2010, J INF SCI, V36, P357, DOI 10.1177/0165551510365390 Tajfel H., 2001, INTERGROUP RELATIONS Tepper M., 1997, INTERNET CULTURE Turner JC, 1987, REDISCOVERING SOCIAL, Vx, P239 Warren C., 2015, WHAT THE DOG KNOWS Weisel O, 2015, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V60, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.008 Widyanto Laura, 2011, International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, V1, P13, DOI 10.4018/ijcbpl.2011010102 Yardi S., 2010, B SCI TECHNOL SOC, V30, P316, DOI [10.1177/0270467610380011, DOI 10.1177/0270467610380011] NR 47 TC 32 Z9 32 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD JUN PY 2017 VL 71 BP 70 EP 78 DI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.053 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU van de Weijer, SGA Leukfeldt, ER AF van de Weijer, Steve G. A. Leukfeldt, E. Rutger TI Correction to: Big Five Personality Traits of Cybercrime Victims, by van de Weijer and Leukfeldt Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2017; 20:407-412. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0028 SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Correction; Early Access CR VANDEWEIJER, 2022, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY NR 1 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD 2022 JAN 31 PY 2022 DI 10.1089/cyber.2017.0028.correx EA JAN 2022 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Riva, G AF Riva, Giuseppe TI HoloMedical3D: Connecting the Dots for Medical Holography SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Editorial Material AB This column will try to describe the characteristics of current cyberpsychology research in Europe. In particular, CyberEurope aims at describing the leading research groups and projects running on the other side of the Ocean. C1 [Riva, Giuseppe] Catholic Univ Milan, Dept Psychol, Largo Gemelli 1, I-20123 Milan, Italy. [Riva, Giuseppe] Ist Auxol Italiano, Appl Technol Neuropsychol Lab, Milan, Italy. C3 Catholic University of the Sacred Heart; IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano RP Riva, G (corresponding author), Catholic Univ Milan, Dept Psychol, Largo Gemelli 1, I-20123 Milan, Italy. EM giuseppe.riva@unicatt.it NR 0 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD NOV PY 2018 VL 21 IS 11 BP 737 EP 738 DI 10.1089/cyber.2018.29131.ceu WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Wang, CQ Li, X Xia, LX AF Wang, Chaoqun Li, Xiong Xia, Ling -Xiang TI Long-term effect of cybervictimization on displaced aggressive behavior across two years: Mutually predicting mediators of hostile emotion and moral disengagement SO COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR LA English DT Article DE Cybervictimization; Displaced aggressive behavior; Hostile emotion; Moral disengagement; Long-term effect ID INFORMATION-PROCESSING MECHANISMS; PROACTIVE AGGRESSION; FIT INDEXES; TRAIT ANGER; VICTIMIZATION; STUDENTS; PEER; PERPETRATION; PROVOCATION; MOTIVATION AB Although the negative effects of cybervictimization are attracting increasing attention, its long-term consequences among college students and the underlying mechanisms behind the effects are still unclear. We attempted to address these issues by testing the mutually predicting mediators of hostile emotion and moral disengagement in the potential longitudinal effect of cybervictimization on self-reported displaced aggressive behavior across two years. The victims' subscale of the Cyberbullying Inventory for College Students, the hostile emotion subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form, the Civic Moral Disengagement Questionnaire, and the Displaced Aggression Questionnaire were completed by 1157 undergraduates in three waves, one year apart. The results of the longitudinal multiple mediating model and cross-lagged panel model analyses showed that, after controlling for displaced aggressive behavior at Wave 1, cybervictimization at Wave 1 predicted hostile emotion and moral disengagement at Wave 2, which in turn predicted displaced aggressive behavior at Wave 3. Moreover, hostile emotion and moral disengagement could longitudinally predict each other. A motivation perspective was developed to comprehensively interpret the multiple mediating model with two mutually predicting mediators. Our findings and ideas contribute to cyber psychology by enhancing the understanding on the negative consequences of negative social experiences derived from Internet use (e.g., cybervictimization) and give practical implications to maintain mental health in Internet use. C1 [Wang, Chaoqun; Li, Xiong; Xia, Ling -Xiang] Southwest Univ, Fac Psychol, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China. C3 Southwest University - China RP Xia, LX (corresponding author), Southwest Univ, Fac Psychol, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China. EM xialx@swu.edu.cn CR AGNEW R, 1992, CRIMINOLOGY, V30, P47, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x Anderson C. A., 2004, SOCIAL PSYCHOL GOOD, V41, P168 Anderson CA, 2002, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V53, P27, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231 Bandura A, 1996, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V71, P364, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.125 Bandura A, 1999, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, V3, P193, DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 Bandura A, 2002, J MORAL EDUC, V31, P101, DOI 10.1080/0305724022014322 Bandura A, 2001, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V52, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 Bandura A, 2001, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V80, P125, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.80.1.125 Bandura A., 2016, MORAL DISENGAGEMENT BARON RA, 1975, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V31, P825, DOI 10.1037/h0076647 Beran TN, 2012, SCHOOL PSYCHOL INT, V33, P562, DOI 10.1177/0143034312446976 BERKOWITZ L, 1989, PSYCHOL BULL, V106, P59, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59 BERKOWITZ L, 1990, AM PSYCHOL, V45, P494, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.494 BERKOWITZ L, 1993, MOTIV EMOTION, V17, P277, DOI 10.1007/BF00992223 BOND A, 1986, BIOL PSYCHOL, V22, P69, DOI 10.1016/0301-0511(86)90021-9 Byers DS, 2021, J DIVERS HIGH EDUC, V14, P508, DOI 10.1037/dhe0000180 Caprara GV, 2014, DEV PSYCHOL, V50, P71, DOI 10.1037/a0034488 Caprara GV, 2009, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V47, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.027 Cheung GW, 1999, J MANAGE, V25, P1, DOI 10.1177/014920639902500101 Cheung GW, 2002, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V9, P233, DOI 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 Chu XW, 2018, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V47, P2384, DOI 10.1007/s10964-018-0908-4 Cowie H, 2002, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V7, P33, DOI 10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00034-3 CRICK NR, 1994, PSYCHOL BULL, V115, P74, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74 Crick NR, 1996, CHILD DEV, V67, P993, DOI 10.2307/1131875 Denson TF, 2006, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V90, P1032, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.1032 Denson TF, 2012, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V21, P20, DOI 10.1177/0963721411429451 DODGE KA, 1987, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V53, P1146, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1146 Donaldson SI, 2002, J BUS PSYCHOL, V17, P245, DOI 10.1023/A:1019637632584 Dou GB, 2020, PSYCHOL RES BEHAV MA, V13, P1269, DOI 10.2147/PRBM.S286543 Egan SK, 1998, DEV PSYCHOL, V34, P996, DOI 10.1037//0012-1649.34.5.996 Estevez A, 2016, J CHILD SEX ABUS, V25, P449, DOI 10.1080/10538712.2016.1156207 [范翠英 Fan Cuiying], 2017, [中国临床心理学杂志, Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology], V25, P516 [方杰 Fang Jie], 2021, [心理科学, Journal of Psychological Science], V44, P989 Fang J, 2020, CHILD YOUTH SERV REV, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105085 Fanning JR, 2019, J PSYCHIATR RES, V109, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.10.013 FENIGSTEIN A, 1974, J RES PERS, V7, P306, DOI 10.1016/0092-6566(74)90052-X Francisco SM, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V43, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.045 FRODI A, 1976, PSYCHOL REP, V38, P659, DOI 10.2466/pr0.1976.38.2.659 Gibson S, 2005, AUTOMATICA, V41, P1667, DOI 10.1016/j.automatica.2005.05.008 Gini G, 2014, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V40, P56, DOI 10.1002/ab.21502 Gino F, 2012, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V119, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.011 Giumetti GW, 2022, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V48, P40, DOI 10.1002/ab.21992 Gonzalez-Cabrera J, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V70, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.054 Graca J, 2016, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V90, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.042 [古茜茜 Gu Xixi], 2021, [中国心理卫生杂志, Chinese Mental Health Journal], V35, P676 Guo MZ., 2010, J CHINESE MENTAL HLT, V24, P524, DOI [DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-6729.2010.07.012, 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2010.07.012] Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger E, 2015, MERRILL PALMER QUART, V61, P192 Hesapcioglu ST, 2017, PEDIATR INT, V59, P16, DOI 10.1111/ped.13067 Hiller CR, 2018, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V81, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.007 Hu LT, 1999, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/10705519909540118 Jenaro C, 2021, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE, V36, P579, DOI 10.1177/0886260517730030 Joosten AV, 2008, J AUTISM DEV DISORD, V38, P1341, DOI 10.1007/s10803-007-0523-9 Kraft EM, 2010, INT J TECHNOETHICS, V1, P74, DOI 10.4018/jte.2010100106 LAURITSEN JL, 1991, CRIMINOLOGY, V29, P265, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01067.x Lee JM, 2021, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE, V36, P10314, DOI 10.1177/0886260519884679 Li R, 2021, ACTA PSYCHOL SIN, V53, P788, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00788 Little TD, 2002, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V9, P151, DOI 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1 Liu C., 2009, B ED PSYCHOL, V41, P361 Liu JY, 2022, ACTA PSYCHOL SIN, V54, P1455, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.01455 Lopes LD, 2022, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V88, DOI 10.1128/aem.00971-22 Lozano-Blasco R, 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106444 Mawson A. R., 1987, TRANSIENT CRIMINALIT Miller N, 2003, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V7, P75, DOI 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_5 Miller N. E., 1958, FRUSTRATION AGGRESS, DOI [10.1037/11305-023, DOI 10.1037/11305-023] MISLEVY RJ, 1991, J EDUC STAT, V16, P150 Moore C, 2015, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V6, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.018 Morea A, 2022, RES CHILD ADOLES PSY, V50, P1299, DOI 10.1007/s10802-022-00926-0 NOVY DM, 1985, ADOLESCENCE, V20, P313 Obermann ML, 2011, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V37, P133, DOI 10.1002/ab.20378 Pabian S, 2016, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V45, P328, DOI 10.1007/s10964-015-0259-3 Perren S, 2012, EUR J DEV PSYCHOL, V9, P195, DOI 10.1080/17405629.2011.643168 Pornari CD, 2010, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V36, P81, DOI 10.1002/ab.20336 Preacher KJ, 2008, BEHAV RES METHODS, V40, P879, DOI 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 Quintana-Orts C, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17217966 Raine A, 2006, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V32, P159, DOI 10.1002/ab.20115 Rajchert J, 2017, CURR PSYCHOL, V36, P417, DOI 10.1007/s12144-016-9430-6 Rassart J, 2018, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V63, P792, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.019 Rathert J, 2011, CHILD PSYCHIAT HUM D, V42, P609, DOI 10.1007/s10578-011-0236-3 Reijntjes A, 2013, J EXP CHILD PSYCHOL, V115, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.010 Rose CA, 2016, REM SPEC EDUC, V37, P308, DOI 10.1177/0741932516629219 Rubio-Garay F, 2016, SCAND J PSYCHOL, V57, P129, DOI 10.1111/sjop.12270 Runions KC, 2019, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V48, P1835, DOI 10.1007/s10964-019-01067-2 Schenk AM, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P2320, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.013 Schwaba T, 2018, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V115, P118, DOI 10.1037/pspp0000150 Sharma E, 2014, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V123, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.09.001 She Z, 2022, J SOC ISSUES, V78, P209, DOI 10.1111/josi.12500 Shen YN, 2019, SOC BEHAV PERSONAL, V47, DOI 10.2224/sbp.7720 [石慧芬 Shi Huifen], 2020, [心理科学, Journal of Psychological Science], V43, P1117 Shu LL, 2011, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V37, P330, DOI 10.1177/0146167211398138 Snneijers D, 2018, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V44, P471, DOI 10.1002/ab.21767 Song MH, 2019, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V97, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.015 Staubli S, 2011, EUR J CRIMINOL, V8, P377, DOI 10.1177/1477370811415761 Stone AL, 2020, SUBST USE MISUSE, V55, P1925, DOI 10.1080/10826084.2020.1781178 [苏姝 Su Shu], 2020, [中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science], V29, P1132 Su S, 2021, INT J PSYCHOL, V56, P669, DOI 10.1002/ijop.12745 Sun L., 2017, PSYCHOL DEV ED, V33, P65, DOI DOI 10.16187/J.CNKI.ISSN1001-4918.2017.01.08 [汤丹丹 Tang Dandan], 2020, [心理科学, Journal of Psychological Science], V43, P215 [唐丽丽 Tang Lili], 2022, [中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science], V31, P267 Thornberg R, 2018, BRIT J SOCIOL EDUC, V39, P144, DOI 10.1080/01425692.2017.1330680 Travlos AK, 2021, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE, V36, P2262, DOI 10.1177/0886260518760012 van Teffelen MW, 2021, PSYCHOL VIOLENCE, V11, P82, DOI 10.1037/vio0000340 Vandenberg RJ, 2000, ORGAN RES METHODS, V3, P4, DOI 10.1177/109442810031002 Wachs S, 2012, EMOT BEHAV DIFFIC, V17, P347, DOI 10.1080/13632752.2012.704318 Walters GD, 2018, J SCHOOL PSYCHOL, V68, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.12.003 Wang YY, 2020, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V46, P476, DOI 10.1002/ab.21913 Watson D., 1994, PANAS X MANUAL POSIT Watts LK, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V69, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.038 Wong JS, 2013, CRIM JUSTICE BEHAV, V40, P1184, DOI 10.1177/0093854813503443 WORCHEL PHILIP, 1966, J EXP RES PERSONALITY, V1, P256 Wright MF, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P448, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0061 Yang F, 2022, CURR PSYCHOL, DOI 10.1007/s12144-022-02874-w Yang JP, 2022, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107420 Yokotani K, 2021, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106719 Zhang H, 2023, PSYCHOL SCHOOLS, V60, P1488, DOI 10.1002/pits.22707 Zhu WF, 2020, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V162, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110007 Zhu WF, 2019, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V149, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.001 [朱晓伟 Zhu Xiaowei], 2019, [中国临床心理学杂志, Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology], V27, P492 NR 117 TC 0 Z9 0 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD APR PY 2023 VL 141 AR 107611 DI 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107611 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Serafin, MJ Garcia-Vargas, GR Garcia-Chivita, MDP Caicedo, MI Correra, JC AF Serafin, Manuel J. Garcia-Vargas, Gustavo R. Garcia-Chivita, Maria del Pilar Caicedo, Mario, I Correra, Juan C. TI Cyberbehavior: A Bibliometric Analysis SO ANNUAL REVIEW OF CYBERTHERAPY AND TELEMEDICINE LA English DT Article DE Bibliometrix; Cyberpsychology; Scientific collaboration ID INTERNET; TWITTER; SCIENCE; REAL AB Cyberbehavior, as the object of study of cyberpsychology, refers to the set of human behaviors that require an electronic device with Internet access to interact with other persons in both synchronous and asynchronous ways. Although the first studies of cyberbehavior took place with the popularization of the so-called "Social Web", few works focus on reviewing this literature. This paper aims to provide a bibliometric review of the scientific publication on cyberbehavior by analyzing all the documents published by four of the most representative international journals on the topic. The results show that in spite of the growth of the scientific community, the research has focused on the use of Facebook and other social media, while relevant subject matters for psychologists (e.g., motivation, personality, Internet addiction, cyberbullying or self-expression) remain little explored. C1 [Serafin, Manuel J.] Univ Nacl Expt Politecn Antonio Jose Sucre, Dept Ciencias Basicas Vicerrectorado Luis Caball, Ciudad Guayana, Bolivar, Venezuela. [Garcia-Vargas, Gustavo R.] Univ Ibague, Dept Psicol, Ibague, Colombia. [Garcia-Chivita, Maria del Pilar] Ctr Estudios Aeronaut, Aeronaut Civil, Bogota, Colombia. [Caicedo, Mario, I] Univ Simon Bolivar, Dept Fis, Caracas, Venezuela. [Correra, Juan C.] Fdn Univ Konrad Lorenz, Fac Psicol, Bogota, Colombia. C3 Simon Bolivar University RP Correra, JC (corresponding author), Fdn Univ Konrad Lorenz, Fac Psicol, Bogota, Colombia. EM juanc.correan@konradlorenz.edu.co CR Aarts AA, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, DOI 10.1126/science.aac4716 Aria M, 2017, J INFORMETR, V11, P959, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 Barabasi A.-L., 2016, NETWVORK SCI Bollen J, 2017, EPJ DATA SCI, V6, DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0100-1 Correa JC, 2019, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V46, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.05.002 Correa JC, 2017, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V20, P37, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2016.0402 Correa T, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003 Costa LD, 2011, ADV PHYS, V60, P329, DOI 10.1080/00018732.2011.572452 Gaggioli, 2014, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V17, P496 Gaggioli, 2011, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V14, P625 Gaggioli, 2016, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V19, P746 Gaggioli, 2013, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V16, P714 Gaggioli, 2012, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V15, P639 Gaggioli, 2015, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V18, P426 Harley D., 2018, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY EVER Holden MK, 2005, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V8, P187, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 Ja K., 2009, WHAT IS SCI INTERDIS Kim C, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.013 Kolaczyk E. D., 2014, STAT ANAL NETVORK DA, V65 Krombholz Katharina, 2012, Journal of Service Science Research, V4, P175, DOI 10.1007/s12927-012-0008-z Landers RN, 2016, PSYCHOL METHODS, V21, P475, DOI 10.1037/met0000081 Lazer DMJ, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P1094, DOI 10.1126/science.aao2998 Li YM, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P673, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.004 Lin KY, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1152, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009 Mazieres A, 2014, PORN STUDIES, V1, P80, DOI DOI 10.1080/23268743.2014.888214 Norman KL, 2017, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY INTR, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781316212554 O'reilly T., 2007, COMMUNICATIONS STRAT, V1, P17, DOI DOI 10.1109/KIMAS.2003.1245106 Olson GM, 2000, HUM-COMPUT INTERACT, V15, P139, DOI 10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4 Pappalardo G, 2018, EPJ DATA SCI, V7, DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0159-3 Park N, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P729, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2009.0003 Piazza J, 2009, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V25, P1258, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.002 Pickering C, 2014, HIGH EDUC RES DEV, V33, P534, DOI 10.1080/07294360.2013.841651 R Core Team, 2018, LANG ENV STAT COMP R Raacke J, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P169, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.0056 Rauzzino Antonietta, 2017, Suma Psicol., V24, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.sumpsi.2017.08.002 Riva G., 2010, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V13, P719 Riva G., 2016, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V19, P155 Riva G., 2014, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V17, P568 Riva G., 2015, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V18, P362 Riva G., 2008, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V11, P250 Riva G., 2011, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V14, P263 Riva G., 2012, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V15, P334 Riva G, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P780, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2013.1529 Riva Giuseppe, 2009, Cyberpsychol Behav, V12, P773, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2009.9989 Riva Giuseppe, 2007, Cyberpsychol Behav, V10, P321, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9949 Riva Giuseppe, 2006, Cyberpsychol Behav, V9, P374, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.374 Russell M, 2014, MINING SOCIAL WEB Salas G, 2018, ACTA COLOMB PSICOL, V21, P13, DOI [10.14718/ACP.2018.21.2.2, 10.14718/acp.2018.21.2.2] Tess PA, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, pA60, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032 Tokunaga RS, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014 Vanderhoven E, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0104036 Wegberg R. V., 2018, J FINANCIAL CRIME, V25, P419 Wickham H., 2016, R DATA SCI IMPORT TI Wood MJ, 2018, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V21, P485, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2017.0669 Yee N, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P772, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772 YOUNG J, 2017, HLTH COMMUNICATION, V32 Young KS, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P671, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9971 NR 57 TC 1 Z9 1 PU INTERACTIVE MEDIA INST PI SAN DIEGO PA 9565 WAPLES ST, STE 200, SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 USA PD SUM PY 2019 VL 17 BP 17 EP 24 WC Computer Science, Cybernetics SC Computer Science ER PT J AU Hurley, OA AF Hurley, Olivia A. TI Sport Cyberpsychology in Action During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Possibilities): A Narrative Review SO FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Review DE sport cyberpsychology; COVID-19; technology; pandemic; social media; video analysis; GPS; online consulting ID TECHNOLOGIES; ANXIETY; STRESS; SKILLS; IMPACT; LIFE AB Interest in sport cyberpsychology has become more popular over the last decade, primarily due to the increased use of technology and the online world, including social media, within sport settings (Hurley, 2018). In 2020, this became even more apparent for many athletes, their support teams and their sport organisations, when their professional and social worlds became cyber-dominated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Many challenges were encountered by: (i) the athletes, in their efforts to remain active and well during this time when all competitions were cancelled and (ii) the healthcare professionals, working with these athletes, in their efforts to continue to support the athletes, when severe travel restrictions and social distancing were in place for considerable periods of time. The purpose of this paper, using a narrative review process, is to present and scrutinise an array of Internet interventions, remote psychological supports and applications (apps) that the athletes and their support personnel used to help them meet their physical, social, and emotional needs during the pandemic. The beneficial and restrictive features of these online options will be presented. Two main themes will be considered in order to focus this discussion, namely, (i) the potential physical and mental opportunities and challenges using the online world extensively during this time presented for the individuals working in sport and (ii) suggestions for how such online interventions used by the athletes, their coaches and sport science personnel during the pandemic may be maintained in some positive ways into the future, to help the athletes prepare for their upcoming competitions, their training and their future careers when they retire from elite sport. C1 [Hurley, Olivia A.] Inst Art Design & Technol, Dept Technol & Psychol, Dublin, Ireland. RP Hurley, OA (corresponding author), Inst Art Design & Technol, Dept Technol & Psychol, Dublin, Ireland. EM olivia.hurley@iadt.ie CR [Anonymous], 2011, THE DRUM [Anonymous], 2020, EXPRESS STAR [Anonymous], 2020, IRISH TIMES Bailey R., 2020, OPPORTUNITY RATHER H Bedir D, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02073 BPS, 2020, GUID PSYCH PROF COV Brivio E, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02569 Brod C., 1984, TECHNOSTRESS HUMAN C Buck DJM, 2016, SPORTS, V4, DOI 10.3390/sports4020023 Bush NE, 2019, PSYCHOL SERV, V16, P188, DOI 10.1037/ser0000286 Callary B, 2020, INT J SPORT COMMUN, V13, P575, DOI 10.1123/ijsc.2020-0221 Chen B., 2019, WHY SLEEP TRACKING D Chtourou H, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01708 Clancy C., 2020, P 2020 C PSYCH SOC I Clement J, 2020, INSTAGRAM ACCOUNTS M Cotterill S., 2020, IMPACT COVID 19 LOCK Cotterill S., 2012, APPL SPORT PSYCHOL S Cotterill S., 2014, APPL SPORT PSYCHOL S Cotterill S., 2019, IMPACT SOCIAL MEDIA Cotterill S.T., 2018, CASE STUDIES SPORT E, V2, P21, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1123/cssep.2018-0002, DOI 10.1123/CSSEP.2018-0002] Coyle D, 2011, 29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P2937 Dangxiao W., 2019, VIRTUAL REALITY INTE, V1, P136, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.2096-5796.2019.0008 Davis PA, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.599925 Deci EL, 2008, CAN PSYCHOL, V49, P14, DOI 10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14 Dellaserra CL, 2014, J STRENGTH COND RES, V28, P556, DOI 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a952fb Devitt A., 2020, PARENT PERSPECTIVES Earley K., 2020, OUTPUT SPORTS IS USI Earley K., 2020, DUBLINS OUTPUT SPORT ESPN, 2019, JERM WHIT JUST LAT L Etzel EF, 2017, INT PER KEY ISS SPO, P63 Evans AB, 2020, EUR J SPORT SOC, V17, P85, DOI 10.1080/16138171.2020.1765100 Farley ORL, 2020, J HUM SPORT EXERC, V15, P535, DOI 10.14198/jhse.2020.153.06 Farrell S., 2019, TENNIS PLAYERS EMBRA FIFPRO, 2020, WORLD PLAYERS UN Figueira B, 2018, SENSORS-BASEL, V18, DOI 10.3390/s18061940 Fitbit Staff, 2020, YEAR HIGHS LOWS FITB FITPRO, 2017, RES VAL WEAR FITN TE Flood C., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG, P153 Foskett RL, 2018, J SCI MED SPORT, V21, P765, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.11.016 Fowler LA, 2016, ADDICT BEHAV, V62, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.008 Francis T., 2018, TRUE GEN GENERATION Fullwood C, 2015, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, P9 Gega L, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P473, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2013.1510 Giorgio P., 2019, REDESIGNING STADIUMS Grassi A, 2011, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V167, P57, DOI 10.3233/978-1-60750-766-6-57 Groom N.R., 2012, THESIS LOUGHBOROUGH Hagger M., 2008, INT REV SPORT EXER P, V1, P79, DOI DOI 10.1080/17509840701827437 Hambrick M. E., 2010, International Journal of Sport Communication, V3, P454 Hammond C., 2019, DO WE NEED WALK 1000 Harris S., 2018, MUSICIANS ATHLETES C Hofstad EF, 2013, SURG ENDOSC, V27, P854, DOI 10.1007/s00464-012-2524-9 Hoge EA, 2013, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V74, P786, DOI 10.4088/JCP.12m08083 Hull JH, 2020, LANCET RESP MED, V8, P557, DOI 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30175-2 Hurley O., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG, P167 Hurley O. A., 2018, SPORT CYBERPSYCHOLOG Hytner M., 2020, QUANTAS ENDS 30 YEAR Ingram J, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588604 Isa MR, 2013, ASIAN PAC J CANCER P, V14, P2237, DOI 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.4.2237 Clemente-Suarez VJ, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01985 Jerath R, 2015, APPL PSYCHOPHYS BIOF, V40, P107, DOI 10.1007/s10484-015-9279-8 Juarascio AS, 2015, EUR EAT DISORD REV, V23, P1, DOI 10.1002/erv.2327 Kendellen K, 2019, PSYCHOL SPORT EXERC, V40, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.09.002 Kerner C, 2017, AM J HEALTH EDUC, V48, P287, DOI 10.1080/19325037.2017.1343161 Kirwan G., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG, P3, DOI [10.1017/9781316212554.002, DOI 10.1017/9781316212554.002] Kirwan G., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG, P271 Kononova A, 2019, JMIR MHEALTH UHEALTH, V7, DOI 10.2196/mhealth.9832 Landi G, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02195 Lane AM, 2016, FRONT PSYCHOL, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00413 Langfield M., 2019, VIRTUAL AUGMENTED RE Latinjak AT, 2019, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01819 Lee IM, 2019, JAMA INTERN MED, V179, P1105, DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0899 Lee JM, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15061265 Leng HK, 2022, MANAG SPORT LEIS, V27, P157, DOI 10.1080/23750472.2020.1762330 Lewis S., 2020, SO WHAT HAVE WE MISS Li J, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560638 Lopez-Bueno R, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01426 Low J.J., 2020, SPORTS TECHNOLOGY GA Lund P.S., 2020, THESIS NORWEGIAN SCH MacIntyre T., 2020, COVID 19 PANDEMIC TI Mayer R., 2020, CAN VIRTUAL REALITY McCarry P., 2020, LEINSTER STAR HUGO K McCluskey M., 2020, HERES WHY THATS SO S McCormack HM, 2015, FRONT PSYCHOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01854 McCurry J., 2020, TOKYO OLYMPICS POSTP McGinnis P. M., 2013, BIOMECHANICS SPORT E Middlemas S, 2018, J APPL SPORT PSYCHOL, V30, P23, DOI 10.1080/10413200.2017.1302020 MILLER KA, 1988, CONTEMP SOCIOL, V17, P253, DOI 10.2307/2070638 Miller R., 2020, PANDEMIC WILL FORCE Mishra Lokanath, 2020, Int J Educ Res Open, V1, P100012, DOI 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012 Nelson BW, 2020, NPJ DIGIT MED, V3, DOI 10.1038/s41746-020-0297-4 O'Connor C., 2020, DEVASTATED ROWER SAY Ogden M., 2011, UNITEDS ALLIANCE SCI Page C, 2019, J SPORT SCI, V37, P2403, DOI 10.1080/02640414.2019.1638193 Panchuk D, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02315 Peake JM, 2018, FRONT PHYSIOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00743 Pegoraro A., 2010, International Journal of Sport Communication, V3, P501 Petersen JM, 2020, J MED INTERNET RES, V22, DOI 10.2196/17152 Pierce S, 2018, J SPORT PSYCHOL ACTI, V9, P11, DOI 10.1080/21520704.2016.1263982 Pietrabissa G, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02201 Power B., 2019, HENSHAW PUSH TACKLE PROCHASKA JO, 1983, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V51, P390, DOI 10.1037//0022-006X.51.3.390 Psychological Society of Ireland [PSI], 2020, GUID US ONL TEL THER Puiatti A, 2011, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P3644, DOI 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090613 Robson C., 2016, DO RES PROJECT GUIDE RTE, 2020, GUTT ACC IR OL ATHL Ryan RM, 2000, AM PSYCHOL, V55, P68, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Santi G, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601743 Sarkar M., 2018, SPORT EXERC SCI, V55 Schinke R, 2020, INT J SPORT EXERC PS, V18, P409, DOI 10.1080/1612197X.2020.1766182 Seah KTM, 2020, INT J SURG, V79, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.057 Seshadri Dhruv R, 2020, Front Digit Health, V2, P8, DOI 10.3389/fdgth.2020.00008 Sharpe S, 2020, INT J SPORT COMMUN, V13, P474, DOI 10.1123/ijsc.2020-0220 Smith D., 2019, IMPORTANCE FACE FACE Smith M.F., 2017, RES METHODS SPORT Sorbie GG, 2020, FRONT SPORTS ACT LIV, V2, DOI 10.3389/fspor.2020.00112 Sors F, 2019, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02380 Standage M., 2014, ENCY SPORT EXERCISE, V2, P629 Taku K, 2020, J LOSS TRAUMA, V25, P623, DOI 10.1080/15325024.2020.1777762 Tayech A, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17228385 The Hard Yards, 2017, EP 25 IAN MAD TIM FR Torres-Luque G, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02418 Twomey C., 2013, Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, V30, P29, DOI 10.1017/ipm.2012.5 van Biemen T, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01803 Watters E., 2020, FITBIT MINDFIT STRES Watts S, 2013, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-244X-13-49 Whales L, 2020, INT J SPORT COMMUN, V13, P541, DOI 10.1123/ijsc.2020-0219 Williams J., 2010, International Journal of Sport Communication, V3, P422 NR 127 TC 9 Z9 9 PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA PI LAUSANNE PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND PD MAR 3 PY 2021 VL 12 AR 621283 DI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621283 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Tolstykh, NN AF Tolstykh, N. N. TI Foreword by the Editor SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIETY LA Russian DT Editorial Material AB The topic of the special issue is cyberpsychology. The term can be interpreted broadly, encompassing all psychological problems arising from the interaction between an individual and the Internet or a computer. Another interpretation is more a narrow, sociopsychological interpretation, which emphasizes interpersonal interaction via the Internet. Given the scope of the journal, the selection process prioritised the manuscripts that were more closely related to social psychology. C1 [Tolstykh, N. N.] Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Moscow, Russia. C3 Moscow State University of Psychology & Education RP Tolstykh, NN (corresponding author), Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Moscow, Russia. EM nnvt@list.ru NR 0 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MOSCOW STATE UNIV PSYCHOLOGY & EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2019 VL 10 IS 4 BP 5 EP 8 DI 10.17759/sps.2019100401 WC Psychology, Applied SC Psychology ER PT C AU Priyadarshini, I Wang, HN Cotton, C AF Priyadarshini, Ishaani Wang, Haining Cotton, Chase BE Arai, K Bhatia, R Kapoor, S TI Some Cyberpsychology Techniques to Distinguish Humans and Bots for Authentication SO PROCEEDINGS OF THE FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE (FTC) 2019, VOL 2 SE Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Cyberpsychology; Authentication; Cyber security; Artificial intelligence; Bots AB In a world where artificial intelligence is one of the greatest assets, unmanned operations seem to be the future. The world of cybersecurity is witness to numerous system break-ins for the purpose of gaining access. One of the ways to gain access to systems is fulfilled by authentication, the process where an entity verifies who he or she claims to be to access a system. With network traffic increasing day by day, the bots form a huge chunk of the network traffic. Over the last few years, bots have been trained to imitate human beings to gain access to computer based systems. Traditional authentication methods are based on what we know, who we are and what we have, and can be bypassed easily these days. Bots have been known to imitate human beings in order to gain access to systems by identifying captchas and picture based authentication systems. A bot gaining access to sensitive data may have severe repercussions. Thus there is a need to introduce certain parameters that could easily tell apart a bot and a human being. One of the primary factors that differentiates bots and human beings is the kind of psychology embedded in humans. In this paper, we identify a set of cyberpsychological factors that could differentiate human beings from bots. This may prove to be beneficial for the purpose of authentication where a human being may be able to authenticate himself/herself based on his/her psychology, whereas a bot may not be able to do the same because of the lack of its thinking capabilities. Therefore, the issue focuses on three important domains, that is, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence and cyberpsychology. C1 [Priyadarshini, Ishaani; Wang, Haining; Cotton, Chase] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA. C3 University of Delaware RP Priyadarshini, I (corresponding author), Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA. EM ishaani@udel.edu; hnw@udel.edu; ccotton@udel.edu CR Ali H., J INF ENG APPL, P59 Amir Shahmeer, 2017, 4 METHODS BYPASS 2 F [Anonymous], 2017, MORAL QUOTIENT Blackmore S., 1998, J MEM EVOL MODEL INF, V2, P159 BURROWS M, 1990, ACM T COMPUT SYST, V8, P18, DOI 10.1145/74851.74852 Connolly I., 2016, INTRO CYBERPSYCHOLOG deRu WG, 1997, IEEE EXPERT, V12, P38, DOI 10.1109/64.642960 Faundez-Zanuy M, 2004, IEEE AERO EL SYS MAG, V19, P3, DOI 10.1109/MAES.2004.1308819 Griffin PH, 2015, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V61, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.150 Hossein D., 2016, AM J IND BUSINESMA, V6, P467 Huang Q., 2018, P NIPS 2018 P 32 INT, P6456 Janssens-Bevernage A, 2010, EDUC DES TECH KNOW, P3 Jones R., 2017, GOOGLE HAS FINALLY K Kaye LK, 2016, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V19, P294, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2016.29033.lkk Kumar A., 2017, INT J SCI RES IJSR Lazzeri N, 2018, APPL SCI-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/app8020302 Markowitz JA, 2000, COMMUN ACM, V43, P66, DOI 10.1145/348941.348995 Momoh O., 2016, TURING TEST Norman K., 2008, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY INTR OReilly L., 2015, GOOGLES NEW CAPTCHA Priyadarshini I., 2018, FEATURES ARCHITECTUR Priyadarshini I., 2018, DETECTING MITIGATING Priyadarshini I., 2019, ADV INTELLIGENT SYST Revermann S., 2017, WHAT DOES IQ STAND I Shah P., 2013, INT J COMPUT APPL Tracey J., 2015, NEW AI SCORES HIGHER Turing A., 1950, MIND, V59, P433, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/LIX.236.433 Wilson R., 2014, DO ROBOTS THINK Yao F., 2016, SAI COMP C Zorkadis V., 2004, Information Management & Computer Security, V12, P123, DOI 10.1108/09685220410518883 NR 30 TC 11 Z9 11 PU SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG PI CHAM PA GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND PY 2020 VL 1070 BP 306 EP 323 DI 10.1007/978-3-030-32523-7_21 WC Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science, Theory & Methods SC Computer Science ER PT C AU Jablonska, MR Polkowski, Z AF Jablonska, Marta R. Polkowski, Zdzislaw GP IEEE TI Internet Hate speech - case study of Poland, Romania, India and Bulgaria SO PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, COMPUTERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ECAI-2020) SE International Conference on Electronics Computers and Artificial Intelligence LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE hate speech; cyberpsychology; online behaviors ID PERSPECTIVES AB As online hate is ubiquitous and spread on the cyberspace, new studies are needed to understand its nature and evolution. We have researched young adults from Poland, India, Romania and Bulgaria to study their hate experiences. We have found out that online hate is an inherent part of their cyberspace activities. This implies a necessity of ongoing education at this field as current skills of participants on dealing with hate speech and possibilities of support as well as legal responsibilities remain relatively low. C1 [Jablonska, Marta R.] Univ Lodz, Fac Econ & Sociol, Inst Logist & Informat, Dept Comp Sci Econ, Lodz, Poland. [Polkowski, Zdzislaw] Jan Wyzykowski Univ, Polkowice, Poland. C3 University of Lodz RP Jablonska, MR (corresponding author), Univ Lodz, Fac Econ & Sociol, Inst Logist & Informat, Dept Comp Sci Econ, Lodz, Poland. EM marta.jablonska@uni.lodz.pl; z.polkowski@ujw.pl CR Aumer-Ryan K., 2007, INTERPERSONA, V1, P143, DOI [10.5964/ijpr.v1i2.11, DOI 10.5964/IJPR.V1I2.11, DOI 10.5964/ijpr.v1i2.11] Blaya C, 2019, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V45, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.006 Boyle Kevin, 2001, MAINE LAW REV, V53, P488 Cohen-Almagor R., 2014, JB RECHT ETHIK, V22, P431 Cohen-Almagor R, 2011, POLICY INTERNET, V3, DOI 10.2202/1944-2866.1059 Coliver S., 1992, STRIKING BALANCE HAT Dharmesti M, 2021, YOUNG CONSUM, V22, P152, DOI 10.1108/YC-12-2018-0922 Einwiller SA, 2020, POLICY INTERNET, V12, P184, DOI 10.1002/poi3.239 Erjavec K., 2012, TEORIJA PRAKSA, V49, P190 Erjavec K, 2012, MASS COMMUN SOC, V15, P899, DOI 10.1080/15205436.2011.619679 Harris C, 2009, INF COMMUN TECHNOL L, V18, P155, DOI 10.1080/13600830902814943 Harwood J, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V34, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.006 Jaaskelainen T, 2020, POLICY FUTURES EDUC, V18, P344, DOI 10.1177/1478210319848953 Lincoln R.A., 2005, HUMANITIES SOCIAL SC Powell A, 2020, EUR J CRIMINOL, V17, P199, DOI 10.1177/1477370818788006 Schieb C., 2016, P 10 EUR C ANT PROP, P1, DOI DOI 10.1145/2951894.2951896 Sorokowski P, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00553 Sternberg R, 2005, PSYCHOL HATE Suler J, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P321, DOI 10.1089/1094931041291295 van Dijck J, 2020, COMPUT LAW SECUR REV, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105377 Voiskounsky A, 2016, ANN REV CYBERTHERAPY, V14, P16 Walker Samuel, 1994, HATE SPEECH HIST AM Wentraub-Reiter R., 1998, BOSTON PUBLIC INTERE, V8, P145 Wiederhold BK, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P197, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2020.29180.bkw NR 24 TC 0 Z9 0 PU IEEE PI NEW YORK PA 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA PY 2020 WC Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Engineering, Electrical & Electronic SC Computer Science; Engineering ER PT J AU Kochetkov, NV AF Kochetkov, Nikita, V TI Conference in Memory of M.Yu. Kondratyev: Subjectivity Reflected Many Times SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIETY LA Russian DT Article DE conference; social psychology; ethnopsychology; organizational psychology; road traffic; educational psychology; psychological training; cyberpsychology; psychological counseling AB The article presents a report on the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference in memory of M.Yu. Kondratiev "Social Psychology: Questions of theory and practice" held on May 12-13, 2021 at the Moscow State Psychological and Pedagogical University. Its main reports and events are highlighted, and the importance of the conference as an event that connects professionals in the field of social psychology is noted. C1 [Kochetkov, Nikita, V] Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Dept Social Psychol, Moscow, Russia. C3 Moscow State University of Psychology & Education RP Kochetkov, NV (corresponding author), Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Dept Social Psychol, Moscow, Russia. EM nkochetkov@mail.ru CR Kondrateva M.Yu, 2021, SOTSIALNAYA PSIKHOLO Kondratyev M.Yu, 2020, SOTSIALNAYA PSIKHOLO, V11, DOI [10.17759/sps.2020110214, DOI 10.17759/SPS.2020110214] Petrovskii V.A, 1985, VOP PSIKHOL+, P17 Yu O, 2011, SOTSIALNAYA PSIKHOLO, V2, P14 NR 4 TC 1 Z9 1 PU MOSCOW STATE UNIV PSYCHOLOGY & EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2021 VL 12 IS 2 BP 217 EP 221 DI 10.17759/sps.2021120213 WC Psychology, Applied SC Psychology ER PT C AU Drange, T Kargaard, J AF Drange, Tom Kargaard, Joakim BE McLaren, B Reilly, R Zvacek, S Uhomoibhi, J TI Cyberpsychology: Psychological Processes That May Affect Dropout Rates among Online IT Security Students SO CSEDU: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION - VOL 2 LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Online Education; Cyberpsychology; Social Anxiety; Drop out Rate ID SOCIAL ANXIETY AB "Peter" is an online student in an IT Security program, and since the educational institution offers it online and he is a shy person, he thought that he would feel more comfortable at home, not having to face a lot of new people. As the number of online studies increases so does the dropout rate among these students. Research has shown that about 85% of people suffering from social anxiety have difficulties maintaining relationships as well as coping with academic challenges. Social anxiety could be the main contributor for young people to select studying online rather than in a physical classroom and therefore there may be a strong correlation between academic difficulties, social anxiety and the dropout rate for online students. This paper aims to enlighten educational institutions and staff that offers online study programs, by following "Peter" and his challenges, and at the same time discuss the different psychological processes he goes through and try to relate these to the rising dropout rate in higher online education. "Peter" is, of course, a fictive character, but With challenges, the authors experience from students on a frequent basis. The authors base the discussion on own experience and recent research. C1 [Drange, Tom] Noroff Univ Coll, Elvegt 2a, N-4608 Kristiansand, Norway. [Drange, Tom] Univ Sunderland, Fac Comp Engn & Technol, David Goldman Bldg,St Peters Campus, Sunderland, England. [Kargaard, Joakim] Noroff Educ, Elvegt 2a, N-4608 Kristiansand, Norway. C3 University of Sunderland RP Drange, T (corresponding author), Noroff Univ Coll, Elvegt 2a, N-4608 Kristiansand, Norway.; Drange, T (corresponding author), Univ Sunderland, Fac Comp Engn & Technol, David Goldman Bldg,St Peters Campus, Sunderland, England. CR Aiken M., 2016, THE CYBER EFFECT Bandelow B, 2015, DIALOGUES CLIN NEURO, V17, P327 Beard C, 2011, J ANXIETY DISORD, V25, P722, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.03.009 Candy PC, 1991, SELF DIRECTION LIFEL de Jong T, 2010, INSTR SCI, V38, P105, DOI 10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0 Drange T., 2017, INT SCI C ELEARNING Kahneman D, 2015, FORTUNE, V172, P20 Moreno R, 2009, COGNITIVE LOAD THEOR Nhino, 2013, SOS ANGST Russell G, 2012, J MENT HEALTH, V21, P375, DOI 10.3109/09638237.2012.694505 Ruvinsky L I, 1986, ACTIVENESS SELF ED Song D, 2016, COGENT EDUC, V3, DOI 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1205838 Suler J.R., 2016, PSYCHOL DIGITAL AGE Suler J, 2017, INT J APPL PSYCH STU, V14, P97, DOI 10.1002/aps.1487 Turkle S., 2012, GROWTH Villiers D, 2009, PERFECTIONISM SOCIAL, V1st, P3 Wetterberg L., 2004, S AFRICAN PSYCHIAT R, P30 NR 17 TC 0 Z9 0 PU SCITEPRESS PI SETUBAL PA AV D MANUELL, 27A 2 ESQ, SETUBAL, 2910-595, PORTUGAL PY 2019 BP 252 EP 257 DI 10.5220/0006776502520257 WC Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Education & Educational Research; Education, Scientific Disciplines SC Computer Science; Education & Educational Research ER PT J AU Giansanti, D Maccioni, G AF Giansanti, Daniele Maccioni, Giovanni TI Health in the palm of your hand-part 2: design and application of an educational module for young people on the risks from smartphone abuse and the opportunities of telemedicine and e-Health SO MHEALTH LA English DT Article DE Mobile -health; smartphone; text neck; addiction; telemedicine ID MOBILE; ADULTS AB Background: The evolution of mHealth is strictly related to the evolution of the mobile-technology and in particular of the smartphone. However, it is increasingly becoming clear that excessive use of the smartphone has implications for health in terms of emerging risks and in particular (I) the text neck, (II) the addiction, (III) the use of deceptive Apps in mHealth and today telemedicine and e-Health solutions to face this are strongly needed. What young people need is a package of solutions that allow them to tackle all three of these problems at the same time through dedicated tools and specific material on these topics. However up to now this is lacking. The purpose of the study was the design and application of a teaching package focused in this field and specific for young people, the target population for the emerging risks. Methods: A teaching package was developed in a school-work alternation program for the secondary schools at the Italian National Institute of Health, according the Italian Law. It was available on the basis of proposals offered publically. It provided a two weeks stage on the topics: the risks from smartphone abuse and Telemedicine and e-Health solutions. Results: A specific electronic survey in this field was available at the end of the stage. The survey was submitted to 500 young subjects (50% male; 50% females; mean age 15.9 y; std-dev 1.2 y) at school and/or in meeting initiatives. The outcome demonstrated: (I) that the knowledge on the postural risk (text neck) was very poor, while the desiderata of Apps for correcting the posture was very high; (II) the feasibility to obtain feedback on the risk of addiction through a cyber-psychology approach; (III) a worrying position in relation to non-medical Apps confused with the medical ones. Conclusions: The study demonstrated how the young people mBorn can familiarize with some aspects of telemedicine and e-Health and be at the same time a kind of spreader of a correct vision of the ratio between user and smartphone and the knowledge on both the mTech and the related problems. C1 [Giansanti, Daniele; Maccioni, Giovanni] Ist Super Sanita, Ctr TISP, Via Regina Elena 299, I-00131 Rome, Italy. C3 Istituto Superiore di Sanita (ISS) RP Giansanti, D (corresponding author), Ist Super Sanita, Ctr TISP, Via Regina Elena 299, I-00131 Rome, Italy. EM daniele.giansanti@iss.it CR Baldani G., 2014, SALUTE E SOC, P171 Censi F, 2015, EXPERT REV MED DEVIC, V12, P273, DOI 10.1586/17434440.2015.1007125 Choi Jung-Hyun, 2016, J Phys Ther Sci, V28, P1660, DOI 10.1589/jpts.28.1660 Cuellar JM, 2017, SPINE J, V17, P901, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.009 de la Torre-Diez I, 2015, TELEMED E-HEALTH, V21, P81, DOI 10.1089/tmj.2014.0053 De Pasquale C., 2015, INT J PSYCHOL BEHAV, V1, P109, DOI 10.15344/2455-3867/2015/109 De Pasquale C., 2017, PSYCHOLOGY, V8, P1513, DOI [DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2017.810100, 10.4236/psych.2017.810100] Elhai JD, 2017, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V207, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030 Giansanti D, 2021, MHEALTH, V7, DOI 10.21037/mhealth-20-150 Giansanti D, 2017, TELEMED E-HEALTH, V23, P773, DOI 10.1089/tmj.2016.0255 Giansanti D, 2013, TELEMED E-HEALTH, V19, P991, DOI 10.1089/tmj.2013.0108 Gustafsson E, 2017, APPL ERGON, V58, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.012 Gustafsson E, 2011, ERGONOMICS, V54, P477, DOI 10.1080/00140139.2011.568634 Hansraj Kenneth K, 2014, Surg Technol Int, V25, P277 Kwon M, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558 Lee S, 2015, ERGONOMICS, V58, P220, DOI 10.1080/00140139.2014.967311 Lopez-Fernandez O, 2017, ADDICT BEHAV, V64, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.013 Neupane S., 2017, IJIR, V3, P141 Peper E., 2018, NEUROREGULATION, V5, P3, DOI [10.15540/NR.5.1.3, DOI 10.15540/NR.5.1.3] Rossi AM, 2018, NOTIZIARIO DELLISTIT, V31, P13 Salinetti S., 2018, Notiziario dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita, V31, P3 Toh SH, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0181220 Williams V, 2018, TELEMED E-HEALTH, V24, P464, DOI 10.1089/tmj.2017.0197 NR 23 TC 1 Z9 1 PU AME PUBLISHING COMPANY PI SHATIN PA FLAT-RM C 16F, KINGS WING PLAZA 1, NO 3 KWAN ST, SHATIN, HONG KONG 00000, PEOPLES R CHINA PD JUL PY 2021 VL 7 IS 3 AR 48 DI 10.21037/mhealth-20-129 WC Health Care Sciences & Services; Medical Informatics SC Health Care Sciences & Services; Medical Informatics ER PT J AU Selivanov, VV Meitner, L Griber, YA AF Selivanov, Vladimir V. Meitner, Lothar Griber, Yulia A. TI Features of the Use of Virtual Reality Technologies in the Correction and Treatment of Depression in Clinical Psychology SO CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY AND SPECIAL EDUCATION LA Russian DT Article DE depression; virtual reality; phobias; anxiety disorders; presence effect ID AUGMENTED REALITY; SOCIAL ANXIETY; PERFORMANCE; THERAPY AB The work focused on the examining the use of virtual reality (VR) technologies in the reduction of depression in Europe. More than 70 issues of the journals "Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking", "European Psychologist" were analyzed. We used the bibliometric analysis, the "keyword method" to analyze the text, which is understood as a search for typical terms, content analysis of the content of articles that used VR and depression. In the journal "European Psychologist" the term VR has not been mentioned for the last 2 years, which indicates the secondary importance of this issue for general psychology. In cyberpsychology, on the contrary, since 2019 in Europe, the interest of researchers in the use of VR technologies in clinical psychology has increased. By the content of the journal articles. "Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking" VR technologies are used primarily for the correction of anxiety disorders, and secondly, for the correction of depression. These technologies are used in various ways. The first option is to create VR programs with a direct impact on depression reduction. Here, VR is used as a symptom awareness tool, to create an avatar environment for client dialogue in a nonjudgmental environment. Research has shown that such VR programs are rated by users as a useful tool for informing and emotionally responding to depressive states. The second option is an indirect effect on reducing the level of depression through the reduction of fears, phobias; increased activation, tone, euphoria in mental states; the development of a positive mood, cognitive motivation; an increase in indicators of field independence (cognitive style). A study based on the methods of psychosemantics is presented, which has demonstrated the effect of a specially created VR program with an avatar on changing the unconscious attitudes of the personality, reducing phobia of darkness. The effectiveness of using of VR technologies in reducing depression is determined by modeling of mental experiences and actions in VR, creating a virtual ontology, the influence of VR on conscious and unconscious attitudes, the possibility of responding to unconscious experiences through the user's identification with an avatar. C1 [Selivanov, Vladimir V.] Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Moscow, Russia. [Meitner, Lothar] Univ Appl Sci, Int Sch Management, Dortmund, Germany. [Griber, Yulia A.] Smolensk State Univ, Smolensk, Russia. C3 Moscow State University of Psychology & Education; Smolensk State University RP Selivanov, VV (corresponding author), Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Moscow, Russia. EM vvsel@list.ru; lothar.meitner@yahoo.com; y.griber@gmail.com FU Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation [730000Phi.99.1.(sic)09AA00006] FX The work was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation (2020-2022) No. 730000 Phi.99.1.(sic)09AA00006, the project "Influence of high-level virtual reality technologies on mental development in adolescence". CR Barabanshchikov V.A., 2019, VZAIMODEISTVIE LICHN Barsasella D, 2021, COMPUT METH PROG BIO, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105892 Brimelow RE, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P165, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0286 Bykhovets JV, 2019, CLIN PSYCHOL SPEC ED, V8, P78, DOI 10.17759/cpse.2019080105 Chan JYC, 2020, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V35, P926, DOI 10.1002/gps.5314 Czub M, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P494, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2018.0700 Evans CP, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P134, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0241 Felnhofer A, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P46, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2018.0221 Antao JYFD, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P16, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0103 Fodor LA, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-28113-6 Gamito P, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P150, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0271 Hodges LF, 2001, IEEE COMPUT GRAPH, V21, P25, DOI 10.1109/38.963458 Holmberg TT, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P495, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0295 Hyojung E., 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P198, DOI [10.1089/cyber.2018.0377, DOI 10.1089/CYBER.2018.0377] Imperatori C, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P782, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2020.0339 Kuper GE, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P34, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0111 Kwon JH, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P715, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0651 Lubayskaya AA, 2018, CLIN PSYCHOL SPEC ED, V7, P119, DOI 10.17759/cpse.2018070307 Mahmoud Khadija, 2020, Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Human and Technology Ecosystems. 7th International Conference, LCT 2020. Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 12206), P480, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-50506-6_33 Mayring P., 2015, QUALITATIVE INHALTSA McCabe-Bennett H, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P83, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0320 MedicineNet, DEPR ELD Meitner L., 2021, J MODERN FOREIGN PSY, V10, P36, DOI [10.17759/jmfp.2021000001, DOI 10.17759/JMFP.2021000001] Meyerbroeker K., 2008, CYBERTHERAPY REHABIL, V1, P247 Migoya-Borja M, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P246, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0497 Miller IT, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P10, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0093 Naylor M, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P506, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0287 Newbutt N, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P23, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0206 Park MJ, 2019, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00505 Petrenko V. F., 2010, MNOGOMERNOE SOZNANIE Pot-Kolder R, 2018, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V21, P187, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2017.0082 Riches S, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P51, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2017.0656 Riches S, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P288, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2018.0128 Riva G, 2005, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V8, P220, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.220 Riva G, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P581, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2020.29194.gri Riva G, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P82, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2017.29099.gri Riva J., 2008, CYBERTHERAPY REHABIL, V1, P6, DOI [10.1037/e548252010-001, DOI 10.1037/E548252010-001] Rubtsova OV, 2019, KULT-ISTOR PSIKHOL, V15, P117, DOI 10.17759/chp.2019150312 Rubtsova OV, 2019, KULT-ISTOR PSIKHOL, V15, P100, DOI 10.17759/chp.2019150410 Sarge MA, 2020, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V23, P41, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0678 Selivanov V.V., 2016, NEPRERYVNOE OBRAZOVA, V2, DOI [10.15393/j5.art.2016.3128, DOI 10.15393/J5.ART.2016.3128] Selivanov VV, 2021, EKSP PSIKHOLOGIYA, V14, P20, DOI 10.17759/exppsy.2021000002 Selivanov VV, 2020, PSYCHOL RUSS, V13, P16, DOI 10.11621/pir.2020.0202 Singh MK, 2014, BEHAV RES THER, V62, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2014.08.008 Suso-Ribera C, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P31, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2017.0672 Tardif N, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P39, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2017.0711 Vachkov IV, 2018, CLIN PSYCHOL SPEC ED, V7, P45, DOI 10.17759/cpse.2018070303 Wiederhold BK, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P3, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2018.29136.bkw Wiederhold BK, 2018, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V21, P341, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2018.29114.bkw Zhai K, 2021, GERIATRICS-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/geriatrics6020058 NR 50 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MOSCOW STATE PSYCHOLOGICAL & PEDAGOGICAL UNIV PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, DOM 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2021 VL 10 IS 3 BP 231 EP 255 DI 10.17759/cpse.2021100312 WC Psychology, Clinical SC Psychology ER PT J AU Puryear, C Vandello, JA AF Puryear, Curtis Vandello, Joseph A. TI Inflammatory Comments Elicit Less Outrage When Made in Anonymous Online Contexts SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE LA English DT Article DE Internet; cyberpsychology; digital outrage; morality; online flaming ID SOCIAL COGNITION; AGE; PSYCHOLOGY; INTERNET; NORMS AB Digital communities often face difficulties in limiting inflammatory social exchanges. The present studies test one potential obstacle to combating malicious comments online: that characteristics of specific online environments dull emotional reactions to inflammatory speech. Across four studies, results suggest that online contexts, particularly those lacking social information such as names and profile pictures, attenuate negative reactions to malicious behavior relative to face-to-face contexts. Shifting expectations and perceptions of harm may partly account for varying outrage across face-to-face and digital environments. C1 [Puryear, Curtis; Vandello, Joseph A.] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL USA. C3 State University System of Florida; University of South Florida RP Puryear, C (corresponding author), Univ S Florida, Dept Psychol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA. EM cpuryear@mail.usf.edu CR Bargh JA, 2004, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V55, P573, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922 Crockett MJ, 2017, NAT HUM BEHAV, V1, P769, DOI 10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3 DAFT RL, 1984, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V6, P191 Flores A, 2013, NEW MEDIA SOC, V15, P834, DOI 10.1177/1461444812462842 Fox J, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V33, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.014 Gibb Z. G., 2016, TRANSLATIONAL ISSUES, V2, P313, DOI DOI 10.1037/TPS0000083 Gray K, 2012, PSYCHOL INQ, V23, P101, DOI 10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387 Gray K, 2009, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V96, P505, DOI 10.1037/a0013748 Hayes A.F., 2013, INTRO MEDIATION MODE Hmielowski JD, 2014, INFORM COMMUN SOC, V17, P1196, DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2014.899609 Inbar Y, 2012, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V38, P52, DOI 10.1177/0146167211430232 KELLEY HH, 1973, AM PSYCHOL, V28, P107, DOI 10.1037/h0034225 KIESLER S, 1984, AM PSYCHOL, V39, P1123, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123 Lee H, 2005, SOCIOL QUART, V46, P385, DOI 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00017.x Lindstrom B, 2018, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V147, P228, DOI 10.1037/xge0000365 Lysonski S, 2008, J CONSUM MARK, V25, P167, DOI 10.1108/07363760810870662 McCall C, 2013, PSYCHOL INQ, V24, P314, DOI 10.1080/1047840X.2013.839921 Moor PJ, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P1536, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023 Poole D, 2007, NEW MEDIA SOC, V9, P771, DOI 10.1177/1461444807080341 Postmes T, 2000, HUM COMMUN RES, V26, P341, DOI 10.1093/hcr/26.3.341 Richard FD, 2003, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V7, P331, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331 Shifman L, 2011, CRIT STUD MEDIA COMM, V28, P253, DOI 10.1080/15295036.2010.522589 Short J. A., 1976, SOCIAL PSYCHOL TELEC Sparrow B, 2013, PSYCHOL INQ, V24, P273, DOI 10.1080/1047840X.2013.827079 Suler J, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P321, DOI 10.1089/1094931041291295 Tetlock PE, 2000, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V78, P853, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.853 Uhlmann EL, 2015, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V10, P72, DOI 10.1177/1745691614556679 Wong D L, 1988, Pediatr Nurs, V14, P9 NR 28 TC 2 Z9 2 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC PI THOUSAND OAKS PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA PD SEP PY 2019 VL 10 IS 7 BP 895 EP 902 DI 10.1177/1948550618806350 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Zhu, TS Hu, B Yan, JZ Li, XW AF Zhu, Tingshao Hu, Bin Yan, Jingzhi Li, Xiaowei TI SEMI-SUPERVISED LEARNING FOR PERSONALIZED WEB RECOMMENDER SYSTEM SO COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS LA English DT Article DE Web behavioral modeling; data mining; computational cyberpsychology ID QUERIES AB To learn a Web browsing behavior model a large amount of labelled data must be available beforehand However, lieu often the labelled data is limited and expensive to generate, since labelling typically requires human expertise It could be even worse when we want to train personalized model This paper proposes to train a personalized Web browsing behavior model by some-supervised learning The preliminary result based on the data from our user study shows that semi-supervised learning performs fairly well even though there are very few labelled data we can obtain from the specific user C1 Lanzhou Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China. Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China. C3 Lanzhou University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS RP Hu, B (corresponding author), Lanzhou Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China. EM bh@lzu.edu.cn CR ACRAWAI R, 1994, P 20 INT C VER LARG ANDERSON C, 2002, P 11 WORLD WID WEB C [Anonymous], 1999, P 62 ANN M AM SOC IN BITTSUS D, 1999, P 7 INT C US MOD UM Blum A., P 11 ANN C COMP LEAR CHI E, 2001, ACM CHI 2001 C HUM F, P490 Jansen BJ, 2000, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V36, P207, DOI 10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00056-4 Jennings A., 1993, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, V3, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF01099423 LIEBERMANN H, 1995, INT JOINT C ART INT LIN D, 1998, P INT C MACH LEARN M PIROLLI P, 2003, 9 INT C US MOD JOHNS Spink A, 2001, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V52, P226, DOI 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1591>3.3.CO;2-I ZHOU D, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR, V16 ZHU T, 2005, 19 INT JOINT C ART I ZHU T, 2005, 10 INT C US MOD UM 2 ZHU T, 2003, 9 INT C US MOD UM 20 ZHU TS, 2003, 12 INT WORLD WID WEB NR 17 TC 4 Z9 4 PU SLOVAK ACAD SCIENCES INST INFORMATICS PI BRATISLAVA PA DUBRAVSKA CESTA 9, 84237 BRATISLAVA, SLOVAKIA PY 2010 VL 29 IS 4 SI SI BP 617 EP 627 WC Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence SC Computer Science ER PT J AU Wang, J Kim, S AF Wang, Jaesun Kim, Seoyong TI Searching for New Directions for Energy Policy: Testing the Cross-Effect of Risk Perception and Cyberspace Factors on Online/Offline Opposition to Nuclear Energy in South Korea SO SUSTAINABILITY LA English DT Article DE acceptance of nuclear power; risk perception paradigm; risk perception; cyberpsychology ID PERCEIVED RISK; PSYCHOMETRIC PARADIGM; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; SOCIAL TRUST; ONLINE; ACCEPTANCE; ISSUE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; INVOLVEMENT; PERSUASION AB In the internet age, a considerable amount of information about risk events and objects is shared in cyberspace. Since online and offline spaces are not discrete, there is a cross-effect in which perceptual or attitudinal factors in cyberspace influence offline actions, while offline attitudes affect online actions. However, few studies have examined this cross-effect. In the present study, the intention to engage in online or offline behaviors opposing nuclear energy was the dependent variable. The independent variables included risk perception factors (i.e., perceived risk, perceived benefit, trust, knowledge, and stigma) in the risk perception paradigm, and cyber factors (i.e., self-efficacy in cyberspace, involvement on the internet, trust in cyberspace, conformity to online opinion, and belief in online rumors) in the cyberpsychology paradigm. Our findings offer evidence for the cross-effect of online or offline predictors on online/offline behaviors opposing nuclear energy. All the variables in the cyberspace paradigm influenced offline opposition, while those in the risk perception paradigm affected online opposition. Moreover, the five online-related risk perception variables played a significant role in moderating the relationships of predictors in the risk perception paradigm with offline opposition. C1 [Wang, Jaesun] Honam Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Eodeung Daero 417, Gwangju 62399, South Korea. [Kim, Seoyong] Ajou Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Worldcup Ro 206, Suwon 16499, South Korea. C3 Honam University; Ajou University RP Kim, S (corresponding author), Ajou Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Worldcup Ro 206, Suwon 16499, South Korea. EM ajwjs@honam.ac.kr; seoyongkim@ajou.ac.kr CR ALHAKAMI AS, 1994, RISK ANAL, V14, P1085, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x Anderson AA, 2010, J NANOPART RES, V12, P1083, DOI 10.1007/s11051-010-9860-2 [Anonymous], 2016, J SCI COMMUN, DOI DOI 10.22323/2.15050202 Asch S.E., 1958, EFFECTS GROUP PRESSU, P174 ASCH SE, 1955, SCI AM, V193, P31, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31 ASCH SE, 1956, PSYCHOL MONOGR, V70, P1, DOI 10.1037/h0093718 Bailenson J., 2011, INFINITE REALITY AVA BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 BENFORD RD, 1993, SOCIOL INQ, V63, P30, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1993.tb00200.x Berdahl L, 2016, SCI COMMUN, V38, P382, DOI 10.1177/1075547016647175 Beyth-Marom R., 1997, HLTH RISKS DEV TRANS, P110 Blair A, 2013, POLITICS-OXFORD, V33, P135, DOI 10.1111/1467-9256.12008 CHAIKEN S, 1980, SOC PSYCHOL, V39, P752, DOI DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 Champion V., 2008, HLTH BEHAV HLTH ED T, Vedn, P45 Chiang IP, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P591, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2011.0099 Cobb MD, 2004, J NANOPART RES, V6, P395, DOI 10.1007/s11051-004-3394-4 Dahlgren P, 2005, POLIT COMMUN, V22, P147, DOI 10.1080/10584600590933160 Difonzo N, 2007, FRONT SOC PSYCHOL, P271 Fischhoff B, 2000, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V64, P189, DOI 10.1086/317762 Fischhoff B, 1998, APPL PREV PSYCHOL, V7, P77, DOI 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80005-8 FISCHHOFF B, 1983, J POLICY ANAL MANAG, V2, P559, DOI 10.2307/3323574 FISCHHOFF B, 1978, POLICY SCI, V9, P127, DOI 10.1007/BF00143739 Fox J, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V33, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.014 Friedman SM, 2011, B ATOM SCI, V67, P55, DOI 10.1177/0096340211421587 Hovland C.I., 1953, COMMUN PERSUATION ICT Data and Statistics (IDS) International Telecommunication Union (ITU), INT US PER 100 INH 1 Kasperson R.E., 2001, RISK MEDIA STIGMA UN, P9 Kim, 2014, KOREA POLICY STUDY R, V23, P59 Kim Eunyi, 2015, The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, V30, P207 KIM GEUNSIK, 2017, 행정논총, V55, P207 Kim K. H., 2004, J GLOBAL ACAD MARKET, V13, P159, DOI DOI 10.1080/12297119.2004.9707216 Kim M.J., 2015, J PUBLIC RELAT, V19, P96 Kim MJ, 2013, J HOSP TOUR RES, V37, P377, DOI 10.1177/1096348012436377 Kim S, 2003, POLICY SCI, V36, P125, DOI 10.1023/A:1024866323901 KIM S, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU9122188 Kim Seoyong, 2014, [Journal of Governmental Studies(JGS), 정부학연구], V20, P315 Kim S, 2014, SCI PUBL POLICY, V41, P44, DOI 10.1093/scipol/sct032 Kim S, 2012, J HAPPINESS STUD, V13, P875, DOI 10.1007/s10902-011-9296-0 Kim S, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15061168 Kim S, 2014, ASIAN J WOMEN STUD, V20, P31 Kirwan G., 2010, IRISH J PSYCHOL, V31, P69, DOI [10.1080/03033910.2010.10446324, DOI 10.1080/03033910.2010.10446324] KUKLINSKI JH, 1982, AM J POLIT SCI, V26, P615, DOI 10.2307/2110965 Kurei P., 2018, P 27 INT SCI C EC SO Lee J, 2008, ELECTRON COMMER R A, V7, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.elerap.2007.05.004 Marris C, 1997, RISK ANAL, V17, P303, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00868.x Miyata K, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P1129, DOI 10.1177/0002764215580618 Nail PR, 2000, PSYCHOL BULL, V126, P454, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.454 Passino E.M., 1976, BEHAV BASIS DESIGN B Peters E, 1996, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V26, P1427, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00079.x PETTY RE, 1979, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V37, P1915, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915 PETTY RE, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P367, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.367 Roh S, 2017, NUCL ENG TECHNOL, V49, P1090, DOI 10.1016/j.net.2017.04.005 Rosander M, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P1587, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.023 RYU Y, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU10030758 Siegrist M, 2000, RISK ANAL, V20, P353, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.203034 Siegrist M, 2000, RISK ANAL, V20, P195, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.202020 Siegrist M, 2005, RISK ANAL, V25, P211, DOI 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00580.x Siegrist M, 2005, J RISK RES, V8, P145, DOI 10.1080/1366987032000105315 SLOVIC P, 1991, SCIENCE, V254, P1603, DOI 10.1126/science.254.5038.1603 SLOVIC P, 1991, RISK ANAL, V11, P683, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00658.x Slovic P., 1980, SOC RISK ASSESSMENT, P67 Smilowitz M., 1988, Computers in Human Behaviour, V4, P311, DOI 10.1016/0747-5632(88)90003-9 Stoutenborough JW, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V62, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.098 Suler J.R., 2016, PSYCHOL DIGITAL AGE ter Huurne EFJ, 2009, J RISK RES, V12, P809, DOI 10.1080/13669870902726091 Thomas SA, 2007, SOCIOL SPECTRUM, V27, P679, DOI 10.1080/02732170701534200 Visschers V.H.M., 2018, PSYCHOL PERSPECTIVES, P63, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3. Visschers VHM, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P333, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x WANG J, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI DOI 10.3390/su10051518 Wang Jaesun, 2013, [Korean Public Administration Review, 한국행정학보], V47, P395 Wang J, 2018, CLIMATE, V6, DOI 10.3390/cli6040099 Wang Y., 2005, INT J DISTRIB SENS N, V3, P55 Whitty M. T., 2016, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY STUD Yang S, 2017, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V45, pE53, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.02.013 Yee N, 2009, COMMUN RES, V36, P285, DOI 10.1177/0093650208330254 Zein R.A., INVESTIGATING DETERM Zhou YQ, 2007, J COMMUN, V57, P79, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00330.x NR 77 TC 12 Z9 12 PU MDPI PI BASEL PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND PD MAR 1 PY 2019 VL 11 IS 5 AR 1368 DI 10.3390/su11051368 WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ER PT J AU Efremova, MV Bultseva, MA AF Efremova, Maria V. Bultseva, Maria A. TI The relationship between individual values and prosocial behavior in an online and offline contexts SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIETY LA Russian DT Article DE prosocial behavior; individual values; online context; offline context; cyber-psychology ID SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; SELF; PERSONALITY; COMMUNICATION; EXPOSURE; EMPATHY; MEDIA AB The objective of the study is to investigate the relationship of individual values and prosocial behavior in online and offline contexts. Background. Prosocial behavior contributes to both the well-being of individuals and the prosperity of a society. Its relationship with different factors, among which individual values have the strongest predictive power, is contextually dependent. With the development and dissemination of information and communication technologies, number of people actively involved in various kinds of interactions on the Internet is constantly growing. However, specific features of the online context regarding prosocial behavior and how they can influence the relationship between values and prosocial behavior in this context have not been studied yet. Study design. The study is a socio-psychological survey which was conducted within the framework of a cross-sectional one-sample design. The authors developed and adopted special questionnaires to measure prosocial behavior in online and offline contexts. Values were considered in the Schwartz approach and measured using a short version of the individual values questionnaire included in the European Social Survey methodology (ESS). Participants. The sample of the study is quite heterogeneous and includes 187 respondents from different regions of the Russian Federation (average age 35,4 years, 66% women). Search of respondents was done using non-probabolistic, convenience sampling method. Methods of data analysis. The study is based on quantitative methods. Such methods of data processing and analysis were applied as analysis of descriptive statistics, t-test for paired samples, multiple linear regression analysis (Enter method) in the SPSS 22.0 program. Results. The respondents were more involved in prosocial behavior in an offline context than in an online context. Values of Self-Transcendence only are positively related with prosocial behavior in an offline context, while both Self-Transcendence and Self-Enhancement values are related with prosocial behavior in an online context. Conclusions. The results obtained in the study allow authors to conclude that the Internet is still an undeveloped field for the implementation of prosocial behavior, at least for Russians. Noteworthy is the fact that the relationship between values and prosocial behavior depends on the context in which prosocial behavior can be realized. The universality of the positive relationship of Self-Transcendence values and prosocial behavior was established. However, the finding about positive relationship of Self-Enhancement values and prosocial behavior in an online context is fundamentally new. C1 [Efremova, Maria V.; Bultseva, Maria A.] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Ctr Sociocultural Res, Moscow, Russia. C3 HSE University (National Research University Higher School of Economics) RP Efremova, MV (corresponding author), Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Ctr Sociocultural Res, Moscow, Russia. EM mefremova@hse.ru; mbultseva@hse.ru FU RSF [19-18-00169]; Russian Science Foundation [19-18-00169] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation FX The reported study was funded by RSF, project number 19-18-00169. CR [Anonymous], 2019, WORLD GIV IND ATKINSON S, 2015, ENCY GEROPSYCHOLOGY, P1 Aysina RM, 2019, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V10, P42, DOI 10.17759/sps.2019100404 Bacchini D, 2015, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE, V30, P3065, DOI 10.1177/0886260514554421 Bardi A, 2003, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V29, P1207, DOI 10.1177/0146167203254602 Batson C.D., 2009, OXFORD HDB POSITIVE, P417, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195187243.013.0039 BEM DJ, 1967, PSYCHOL REV, V74, P183, DOI 10.1037/h0024835 Bosancianu CM, 2013, INT J INTERNET SCI, V8, P49 BRIEF AP, 1986, ACAD MANAGE REV, V11, P710, DOI 10.2307/258391 Caprara GV, 2007, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V26, P218, DOI 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.2.218 Caprara GV, 2005, EUR J PSYCHOL ASSESS, V21, P77, DOI 10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77 Cemalcilar Z, 2009, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V46, P432, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.009 Chiou WB, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P68, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2013.0035 Daniel E, 2015, INT J PSYCHOL, V50, P186, DOI 10.1002/ijop.12086 Dollinger SJ, 2007, CREATIVITY RES J, V19, P91, DOI 10.1080/10400410701395028 Dunn EW, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P1687, DOI 10.1126/science.1150952 EISENBERG N, 1987, PSYCHOL BULL, V101, P91, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91 Emelin V, 2012, NATSIONALNYI PSIKHOL, V1, P81 Feigin S., 2014, ANN NEUROSCIENCE PSY, V1, P5, DOI [10.7243/2055-3447-1-5, DOI 10.7243/2055-3447-1-5] Gentile DA, 2009, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V35, P752, DOI 10.1177/0146167209333045 Graziano WG, 2007, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V93, P583, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583 Greitemeyer T, 2011, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V20, P251, DOI 10.1177/0963721411415229 Grishunina EV, 2014, VOP PSIKHOL+, P71 Gritsenko V.V., 2014, PSIKHOLOGICHESKIY ZH, P56 Khang H, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V64, P888, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.010 Kinnunen SP, 2016, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, V10, DOI 10.5817/CP2016-4-6 Knack S, 1997, Q J ECON, V112, P1251, DOI 10.1162/003355300555475 Kogen L, 2019, J MEDIA PSYCHOL-GER, V31, P92, DOI 10.1027/1864-1105/a000232 Kukhtova N.V., 2011, PROSOTSIALNOYE POVED Lane DS, 2018, INFORM COMMUN SOC, V21, P1523, DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340496 LATANE B, 1969, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V5, P189, DOI 10.1016/0022-1031(69)90046-8 Levin D. B., 2002, YALE J LAW TECHNOLOG, V4, P97 Lonnqvist JE, 2006, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V32, P1469, DOI 10.1177/0146167206291672 Ma HK, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P123, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0347 MCCLINTOCK CG, 1989, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V19, P353, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00060.x Mediaskop, 2019, MEDIASKOP REYTINGI I Mishankina N.A, 2013, GUMANITARNAYA INFORM, P72 Molchanov SV, 2007, KULT-ISTOR PSIKHOL, V1, P73 MUZDYBAYEV K, 1983, PSIKHOLOGIYA OTVETST Penner LA, 2002, J SOC ISSUES, V58, P447, DOI 10.1111/1540-4560.00270 PILIAVIN IM, 1969, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V13, P289, DOI 10.1037/h0028433 Poddyakov A.N., 2007, PSIKHOLOGIYA ZH VSHE, P98 Podsakoff PM, 1997, J APPL PSYCHOL, V82, P262, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.262 Priporova EA, 2019, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V10, P96, DOI 10.17759/sps.2019100407 Rokeach M., 1973, UNDERSTANDING HUMAN Runco M., 2015, CREATIVITY HUMAN DEV RUSHTON JP, 1981, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V2, P293 Sagiv L, 2000, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V30, P177, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200003/04)30:2<177::AID-EJSP982>3.0.CO;2-Z Sanderson R, 2017, VALUES BEHAV TAKING, P75, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56352-7_4 SCHALLER M, 1988, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V24, P163, DOI 10.1016/0022-1031(88)90019-4 Schwartz S. H., 2010, PROSOCIAL MOTIVES EM, P221, DOI [DOI 10.1037/12061-012, 10.1037/12061-012] SCHWARTZ SH, 1992, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V25, P1, DOI 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 Schwartz SH, 2012, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V103, P663, DOI 10.1037/a0029393 Seo JY, 2014, J CONSUM MARK, V31, P441 SMITH BMM, 1975, PSYCHOL REP, V37, P307, DOI 10.2466/pr0.1975.37.1.307 Sproull L, 2011, DAEDALUS-US, V140, P140, DOI 10.1162/DAED_a_00120 Statdata.ru (Statdata.ru), 2020, NAS ROSS CHISL DIN S STERN PC, 1994, J SOC ISSUES, V50, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x Subrahmanyam K, 2001, J APPL DEV PSYCHOL, V22, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0193-3973(00)00063-0 Sulakshin S.S, 2014, POLITIKA OBSHCHESTVO, P1065 Usacheva A.V, 2014, VESTNIK U, P277 WISPE LG, 1973, J SOC ISSUES, V28, P1 [ЖЕРЕБИН Всеволод Михайлович ZHEREBIN Vsevolod Mikhailovich], 2017, [Народонаселение, Narodonaselenie], P116 NR 63 TC 3 Z9 3 PU MOSCOW STATE UNIV PSYCHOLOGY & EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2020 VL 11 IS 1 BP 107 EP 126 DI 10.17759/sps.2020110107 WC Psychology, Applied SC Psychology ER PT J AU Beaunoyer, E Guitton, MJ AF Beaunoyer, Elisabeth Guitton, Matthieu J. TI Cyberthanathology: Death and beyond in the digital age SO COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR LA English DT Review DE Cyberthanatology; Digital commemoration; Grief; Mourning; Presence; Thanatology ID SOCIAL SUPPORT; MEMORIALS; INFORMATION; HEALTH; MEDIA; GRIEF; THANATOLOGY; CYBERSPACE; RESPONSES; FACEBOOK AB The preponderance of technology and digital connectedness has revolutionized every aspect of humans' social life, including death. Digital technologies are reshaping how the interactions between the living and the dead are negotiated. Indeed, emerging technologies are not only embedded in end-of-life, death, and grief experiences, they are also changing the global context in which these phenomena take place. Although interactions between death-related phenomena and technologies are not new, the ubiquitous presence of digitalized spaces drastically increased the salience and the magnitude of these interactions. To further and structure the understanding of these interactions, we introduce the concept of cyberthanatology as the articulation of death and all related phenomena with and within the digital space. In the light of this framing concept, this paper explores the topology of online death-related behaviors and phenomena, reviews the current state of knowledge on the online representation of death and grief, and identifies the challenges that will have to be faced in the future in order to optimally integrate the understanding of death-related phenomena in the larger field of cyberpsychology. By promoting and nurturing the dialog between the fields of cyberpsychology and death studies, cyberthanatology research will not only result in theoretical advances but also contribute to generate practical knowledge to help people deal with death and grief in the modern technological age. C1 [Beaunoyer, Elisabeth; Guitton, Matthieu J.] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Pavillon Ferdinand Vandry Room 4889,1050 Ave Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada. [Beaunoyer, Elisabeth] Univ Laval, Fac Nursing, Quebec City, PQ, Canada. [Beaunoyer, Elisabeth; Guitton, Matthieu J.] CERVO Brain Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada. C3 Laval University; Laval University RP Guitton, MJ (corresponding author), Univ Laval, Fac Med, Pavillon Ferdinand Vandry Room 4889,1050 Ave Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada. EM matthieu.guitton@fmed.ulaval.ca FU Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship FX EB is supported by a Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship. CR Aoun SM, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0121101 Arnold M., 2018, DEATH DIGITAL MEDIA Barry Elizabeth, 2008, INT J CULTURAL STUD, V11, P259 Bassett D. J., 2015, SOCIAL SCI, V4, P1127, DOI [10.3390/socsci4041127, DOI 10.3390/SOCSCI4041127, https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4041127] Baum F, 2014, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V29, P349, DOI 10.1093/heapro/das062 Beaunoyer E., 2018, J SCI POPULAR CULTUR, V1, P171, DOI [10.1386/jspc.1.2.171_3, DOI 10.1386/JSPC.1.2.171_3] Beaunoyer E, 2020, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V103, P2515, DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.013 Beaunoyer E, 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424 Bell Jo, 2015, Mortality (Abingdon), V20, P375 Breen LJ, 2022, DEATH STUD, V46, P425, DOI 10.1080/07481187.2020.1739780 Brown W, 2003, J COMMUN, V53, P587, DOI 10.1093/joc/53.4.587 Brubaker JR, 2013, INFORM SOC, V29, P152, DOI 10.1080/01972243.2013.777300 Bryant M, 2017, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V67, P222, DOI 10.3399/bjgp17X690701 Carroll B., 2010, B SCI TECHNOL SOC, V30, P341, DOI 10.1177/0270467610380006 Cerrillo-i-Martinez A, 2018, COMPUT LAW SECUR REV, V34, P1119, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2018.04.008 Chapple HS, 2017, DEATH STUD, V41, P118, DOI 10.1080/07481187.2016.1231000 CLARK DB, 1973, SOCIOL REV, V21, P397, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1973.tb00230.x Cohen EL, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V65, P643, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.042 Cumiskey KM, 2019, DEATH STUD, V43, P414, DOI 10.1080/07481187.2018.1541940 Cupit I., 2012, DYING DEATH GRIEF ON, P103 Daniel ES, 2017, COMMUN RES REP, V34, P143, DOI 10.1080/08824096.2017.1285757 De Vries B, 2004, OMEGA-J DEATH DYING, V49, P5, DOI 10.2190/DR46-RU57-UY6P-NEWM DeGroot JM, 2014, DEATH STUD, V38, P79, DOI 10.1080/07481187.2012.725450 Doka K, 2021, OMEGA-J DEATH DYING, V83, P164, DOI 10.1177/0030222821998464 Drushel B. E., 2011, ETHICS EMERGING MEDI, P1 Erdos D, 2021, COMPUT LAW SECUR REV, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105495 Field D, 1994, Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), V3, P58, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1994.tb00014.x Gamba F, 2015, Revue Des Sciences Sociales, V54, P72 Gamba F, 2018, HEALTH COMMUN, V33, P78, DOI 10.1080/10410236.2016.1242038 Gibson M., 2017, MORTALITY, V22, P224, DOI [10.1080/13576275.2016.1263941, DOI 10.1080/13576275.2016.1263941] Gibson M, 2007, HEALTH SOCIOL REV, V16, P415, DOI 10.5172/hesr.2007.16.5.415 Goh DHL, 2011, ASLIB PROC, V63, P432, DOI 10.1108/00012531111164941 Guitton MJ, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V48, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.004 Guitton MJ, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P1681, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.006 Guitton MJ, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.016 Hutchings T, 2012, EMOTION, IDENTITY AND DEATH: MORTALITY ACROSS DISCIPLINES, P43 Irwin MD, 2015, OMEGA-J DEATH DYING, V72, P119, DOI 10.1177/0030222815574830 Knudsen BT, 2013, MEM STUD, V6, P418, DOI 10.1177/1750698012458309 Li J, 2016, DEATH STUD, V40, P223, DOI 10.1080/07481187.2015.1127296 Maddrell A, 2012, BEREAVE CARE, V31, P46, DOI 10.1080/02682621.2012.710491 Marwick A, 2012, J BROADCAST ELECTRON, V56, P378, DOI 10.1080/08838151.2012.705197 McLuhan Marshall, 1964, LAWS MEDIA NEW SCI Moore J., 2012, DYING DEATH GRIEF ON, P78 Moreno MA, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P708, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0334 Mundt M, 2018, SOC MEDIA SOC, V4, DOI 10.1177/2056305118807911 Myrick JG, 2014, J HEALTH COMMUN, V19, P1278, DOI 10.1080/10810730.2013.872729 Nansen B, 2017, J BROADCAST ELECTRON, V61, P73, DOI 10.1080/08838151.2016.1273925 Nguyen MH, 2021, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106717 Nguyen MH, 2020, SOC MEDIA SOC, V6, DOI 10.1177/2056305120948255 Obst KL, 2020, BMC PREGNANCY CHILDB, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12884-019-2677-9 Ohman C, 2017, MIND MACH, V27, P639, DOI 10.1007/s11023-017-9445-2 Park S, 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106353 Rheingold H, 1993, VIRTUAL COMMUNITY HO Roberts P, 2000, OMEGA-J DEATH DYING, V40, P521, DOI 10.2190/3BPT-UYJR-192R-U969 Roberts P, 2004, GENERATIONS, V28, P41 Robinson C, 2019, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V100, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.011 Robinson L, 2015, INFORM COMMUN SOC, V18, P569, DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532 Saramaki J, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P942, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1308540110 Sas C, 2019, DEATH STUD, V43, P407, DOI 10.1080/07481187.2019.1647643 Sofka C., 2012, DYING DEATH GRIEF ON Sofka CJ, 1997, DEATH STUD, V21, P553, DOI 10.1080/074811897201778 Tasse AM, 2011, J LAW MED ETHICS, V39, P621, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00629.x Vakilifathi M., 2020, ONLINE ISSUE POLITIC WALTER T, 1995, SOCIOLOGY, V29, P579, DOI 10.1177/0038038595029004002 Walter Tony, 2015, Mortality (Abingdon), V20, P215 Walter T, 2011, OMEGA-J DEATH DYING, V64, P275, DOI 10.2190/OM.64.4.a Ward Katie, 1999, SPACE CULT, V2, P71 Wellman B., 1999, COMMUNITIES CYBERSPA, P167, DOI DOI 10.2307/2655574 Whitehead LC, 2007, SOC SCI MED, V65, P782, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.005 NR 69 TC 4 Z9 4 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD SEP PY 2021 VL 122 AR 106849 DI 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106849 EA MAY 2021 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Howard, MC AF Howard, Matt C. TI A Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis Decisions and Overview of Current Practices: What We Are Doing and How Can We Improve? SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION LA English DT Review ID PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ANALYTIC ROTATION; SCALE DEVELOPMENT; BULLYING SCALE; FACTOR PATTERN; VALIDATION; COMPONENTS; NUMBER; RELIABILITY; TUTORIAL AB Authors within the fields of cyberpsychology and human-computer interaction have demonstrated a particular interest in measurement and scale creation, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is an extremely important statistical method for these areas of research. Unfortunately, EFA requires several statistical and methodological decisions to which the best choices are often unclear. The current article reviews five primary decisions and provides direct suggestions for best practices. These decisions are (a) the data inspection techniques, (b) the factor analytic method, (c) the factor retention method, (d) the factor rotation method, and (e) the factor loading cutoff. Then the article reviews authors' choices for these five EFA decisions in every relevant article within seven cyberpsychology and/or human-computer interaction journals. The results demonstrate that authors do not employ the recommended best practices for most decisions. Particularly, most authors do not inspect their data for violations of assumptions, apply inappropriate factor analytic methods, utilize outdated factor retention methods, and omit the justification for their factor rotation methods. Further, many authors omit altogether their EFA decisions. To rectify these concerns, the current article provides a step-by-step guide and checklist that authors can reference to ensure the use of recommended best practices. Together, the current article identifies concerns with current research and provides direct solutions to these concerns. C1 [Howard, Matt C.] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, 142 Moore Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA. C3 Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE); Pennsylvania State University; Pennsylvania State University - University Park RP Howard, MC (corresponding author), Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, 142 Moore Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA. EM mch248@psu.edu CR Baker JR, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P379, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0130 Bartlett MS, 1950, B J PSYCHOL-STAT SEC, V3, P77, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x BENJAMINI Y, 1995, J R STAT SOC B, V57, P289, DOI 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x BENTLER PM, 1990, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V25, P67, DOI 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_8 Browne MW, 2001, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V36, P111, DOI 10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_05 Bunz U, 2004, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V17, P479, DOI 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1704_3 Caplan SE, 2002, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V18, P553, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00004-3 Cetin B, 2011, COMPUT EDUC, V57, P2261, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.014 CHARLTON JP, 1995, J EDUC COMPUT RES, V13, P41, DOI 10.2190/5UPE-80NP-W9WN-BE6W CLIFF N, 1988, PSYCHOL BULL, V103, P276, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.276 Comfrey A. L., 1992, 1 COURSE FACTOR ANAL Conway JM, 2003, ORGAN RES METHODS, V6, P147, DOI 10.1177/1094428103251541 Costello A.B., 2005, PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT, V10, DOI DOI 10.7275/JYJ1-4868 Cudeck R., 2000, HDB APPL MULTIVARIAT, P265, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50011-2 CURETON EE, 1975, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V40, P183, DOI 10.1007/BF02291565 de Winter JCF, 2012, J APPL STAT, V39, P695, DOI 10.1080/02664763.2011.610445 DZIUBAN CD, 1973, AM EDUC RES J, V10, P93 DZIUBAN CD, 1974, PSYCHOL BULL, V81, P358, DOI 10.1037/h0036316 Fabrigar LR, 1999, PSYCHOL METHODS, V4, P272, DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272 Faiola A, 2011, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V27, P131, DOI 10.1080/10447318.2011.537173 FORD JK, 1986, PERS PSYCHOL, V39, P291, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x Furr M., 2011, SCALE CONSTRUCTION P, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446287866 Gorsuch RL, 1997, J PERS ASSESS, V68, P532, DOI 10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_5 Gorsuch RL, 1988, HDB MULTIVARIATE EXP, P231, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_6, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_6] Hair J.F., 2006, DATA ANAL MULTIVARIA Hamari J, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V40, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.048 Hayton JC, 2004, ORGAN RES METHODS, V7, P191, DOI 10.1177/1094428104263675 Henson RK, 2006, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V66, P393, DOI 10.1177/0013164405282485 Hinkin TR, 1998, ORGAN RES METHODS, V1, P104, DOI 10.1177/109442819800100106 HINKIN TR, 1995, J MANAGE, V21, P967, DOI 10.1016/0149-2063(95)90050-0 HORN JL, 1965, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V30, P179, DOI 10.1007/BF02289447 Howard MC, 2015, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V18, P181, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2014.0418 Howard MC, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P677, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2014.0255 JENNRICH RI, 1966, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V31, P313, DOI 10.1007/BF02289465 KAISER HF, 1970, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V35, P401, DOI 10.1007/BF02291817 KAISER HF, 1960, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V20, P141, DOI 10.1177/001316446002000116 KAISER HF, 1958, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V23, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF02289233 Kline P., 2014, EASY GUIDE FACTOR AN, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315788135 Korobili S, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.011 Lam LT, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.021 MacCallum RC, 1999, PSYCHOL METHODS, V4, P84, DOI 10.1037/1082-989x.4.1.84 Namlu AG, 2007, COMPUT EDUC, V48, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.006 O'Connor BP, 2000, BEHAV RES METH INS C, V32, P396, DOI 10.3758/BF03200807 Ozkan S, 2009, COMPUT EDUC, V53, P1285, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011 Patil V. H., 2007, PARALLEL ANAL ENGINE Patil VH, 2008, J BUS RES, V61, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.008 Pawlikowski M, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P1212, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.014 Preacher K. J., 2003, UNDERSTANDING STAT, V2, P13, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15328031US0201_02 Qin H, 2009, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V25, P107, DOI 10.1080/10447310802546732 Rainer RK, 1996, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V12, P93, DOI 10.1016/0747-5632(95)00021-6 Tabachnick B. G, 2001, SAS WINDOWS WORKBOOK Tabachnick B.G., 2007, USING MULTIVARIATE S, V5, P481 TOBIAS S, 1969, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES M, V4, P375, DOI 10.1207/s15327906mbr0403_8 van Braak J, 2007, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V23, P2966, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.014 Velicer WF, 1998, PSYCHOL METHODS, V3, P231, DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231 Wegener DT., 2012, UNDERSTANDING STAT E, DOI 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199734177.001.0001 Yang T, 2012, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V28, P308, DOI 10.1080/10447318.2011.586320 YEOMANS KA, 1982, STATISTICIAN, V31, P221 Zoski KW, 1996, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V56, P443, DOI 10.1177/0013164496056003006 ZWICK WR, 1986, PSYCHOL BULL, V99, P432, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 NR 60 TC 350 Z9 358 PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC PI PHILADELPHIA PA 530 WALNUT STREET, STE 850, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 USA PY 2016 VL 32 IS 1 BP 51 EP 62 DI 10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664 WC Computer Science, Cybernetics; Ergonomics SC Computer Science; Engineering ER PT J AU Guazzini, A Duradoni, M Capelli, A Meringolo, P AF Guazzini, Andrea Duradoni, Mirko Capelli, Ambra Meringolo, Patrizia TI An Explorative Model to Assess Individuals' Phubbing Risk SO FUTURE INTERNET LA English DT Article DE phubbing; cyberpsychology; internet addiction; smartphone addiction ID ONLINE GAMING ADDICTION; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; SELF; GENDER; ADOLESCENTS; MOTIVATIONS; VALIDATION; ALTRUISM; ADOPTION; LIFE AB Phubbing could be defined as a new form of addiction; however, checking the phone and ignoring the speaker could also be linked to the increased availability of virtual social environments. We developed a multidimensional model for phubbing considering psychological dimensions and information and communication technology related habits. We collected data through online questionnaires and surveys. The best model obtained from our data was constituted by Information and Communication Technologies' (ICTs) usage behaviours, Trait Anxiety, Virtual Sense of Community and Neuroticism. Finally, our study confirmed a strong connection between phubbing and online addiction behaviours. C1 [Guazzini, Andrea; Capelli, Ambra; Meringolo, Patrizia] Univ Florence, Dept Educ & Psychol, Via San Salvi 12, I-50135 Florence, Italy. [Guazzini, Andrea; Capelli, Ambra; Meringolo, Patrizia] Ctr Study Complex Dynam CSDC, Via San Salvi 12, I-50135 Florence, Italy. [Duradoni, Mirko] Univ Florence, Dept Informat Engn, Via S Marta 3, I-50139 Florence, Italy. C3 University of Florence; University of Florence RP Guazzini, A (corresponding author), Univ Florence, Dept Educ & Psychol, Via San Salvi 12, I-50135 Florence, Italy.; Guazzini, A (corresponding author), Ctr Study Complex Dynam CSDC, Via San Salvi 12, I-50135 Florence, Italy. EM andrea.guazzini@unifi.it; mirko.duradoni@unifi.it; mildram06@gmail.com; patrizia.meringolo@unifi.it CR Amato F, 2018, CONCURR COMP-PRACT E, V30, DOI 10.1002/cpe.4188 Balta S, 2018, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V2018, P1, DOI [10.1007/s11469-018-9959-8, DOI 10.1007/S11469-018-9959-8] Bandura A., 1988, ANXIETY RES, V1, P77, DOI 10.1080/10615808808248222 Barker V, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P209, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0228 Baron NS, 2012, LANG SCI, V34, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.018 Beranuy M, 2009, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V25, P1182, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.001 Berenguer A, 2017, IEEE CONSUM ELECTR M, V6, P104, DOI 10.1109/MCE.2016.2614524 Bicchieri C, 2009, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V22, P191, DOI 10.1002/bdm.621 Blanchard AL, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P827, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9946 Branas-Garza P, 2018, ECON LETT, V170, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.022 Bullingham L, 2013, J INF SCI, V39, P101, DOI 10.1177/0165551512470051 Campbell SW, 2010, J COMMUN, V60, P536, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01496.x Caplan G, 1964, PRINCIPLES PREVENTIV Chiorri C, 2015, EUR J PSYCHOL ASSESS, V31, P109, DOI 10.1027/1015-5759/a000215 Chotpitayasunondh V, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V63, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018 Davey S, 2018, J FAM COMMUNITY MED, V25, P35, DOI 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_71_17 Field A. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), 2007, ENCY MEASUREMENT STA, P33 Geser H., 2002, SOCIOLOGY MOBI UNPUB Gosling SD, 2003, J RES PERS, V37, P504, DOI 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1 Guazzini A., 2018, P 4 INT SCI FOR SO F, P188 Hussain Z, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V50, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.075 Jerusalem M, 1992, SELF EFFICACY THOUGH, P195, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315800820 Karadag E, 2015, J BEHAV ADDICT, V4, P60, DOI 10.1556/2006.4.2015.005 Kim D, 2014, J ASSOC INF SCI TECH, V65, P578, DOI 10.1002/asi.22987 Krasnova H., 2016, 109 ECIS Kuss DJ, 2011, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V8, P3528, DOI 10.3390/ijerph8093528 Lee YK, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V31, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.047 Ling R., 2004, MOBILE CONNECTION CE Mark G, 2012, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, P555, DOI DOI 10.1145/2207676.2207754 Mattick RP, 1998, BEHAV RES THER, V36, P455, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6 McCown W. G., 2000, BEST POSSIBLE ODDS C Mehroof M, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P313, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0229 Mieczakowski A., 2011, TECHNICAL REPORT Moon J., 2006, P AMCIS 2006 PROC AC Oulasvirta A, 2012, PERS UBIQUIT COMPUT, V16, P105, DOI 10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2 Park BW, 2010, SYST DYNAM REV, V26, P117, DOI 10.1002/sdr.436 Park S, 2013, EDUC MEDIA INT, V50, P266, DOI 10.1080/09523987.2013.862365 Persico V, 2018, FUTURE GENER COMP SY, V89, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.future.2018.05.068 Pielot M, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION WITH MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICES (MOBILEHCI'14), P233, DOI 10.1145/2628363.2628364 Prensky M., 2001, HORIZON, V9, P1, DOI [10.1108/10748120110424816, DOI 10.1108/10748120110424816] Rand DG, 2016, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V145, P389, DOI 10.1037/xge0000154 Roberts JA, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V54, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058 Roberts JA, 2014, J BEHAV ADDICT, V3, P254, DOI 10.1556/JBA.3.2014.015 Rosenberg M., 1965, ACCEPTANCE COMMITMEN, V61, P61, DOI DOI 10.1037/T01038-000 Scragg R., 2003, NZ MED J, V116, P1187 Sibilia L., ITALIAN ADAPTATION G Smith HM, 2000, J CAREER ASSESSMENT, V8, P283, DOI 10.1177/106907270000800306 Spielberger C.D., 1989, INVENTARIO ANSIA STA, P44 Spielberger CD, 1989, STATE TRAIT ANXIETY Tourangeau R, 2004, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V55, P775, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142040 Vosecky J, 2009, NDT: 2009 FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKED DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, P360, DOI 10.1109/NDT.2009.5272173 White J, 2011, MOBILE NETW APPL, V16, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11036-011-0304-8 Wickersham A., 2015, J HOSP MED, V10, P459 Zinbarg RE, 2010, BEHAV RES THER, V48, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.008 NR 54 TC 44 Z9 45 PU MDPI PI BASEL PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND PD JAN PY 2019 VL 11 IS 1 AR 21 DI 10.3390/fi11010021 WC Computer Science, Information Systems SC Computer Science ER PT J AU Smahel, D Blinka, L Ledabyl, O AF Smahel, David Blinka, Lukas Ledabyl, Ondrej TI Playing MMORPGs: Connections between Addiction and Identifying with a Character SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR LA English DT Article ID INTERNET AB Addiction to online role-playing games is one of the most discussed aspects of recent cyberpsychology, mainly for its potentially negative impact on the social lives of young people. In our study, we focus on some aspects of youth and adolescent addiction to MMORPGs. We investigated connections between players and their game characters and examined if, and in what ways, player relationship to their character affected potential addiction. Players attitude to their characters seems to play a specific role, since players who tend to be addicted view their characters as being superior and more often wish to be like their characters in their real lives. Our research also confirmed that younger players are generally more prone to addiction. C1 [Smahel, David; Blinka, Lukas; Ledabyl, Ondrej] Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Brno 60200, Czech Republic. C3 Masaryk University Brno RP Smahel, D (corresponding author), Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Jostova 10, Brno 60200, Czech Republic. EM smahel@fss.muni.cz CR Allison SE, 2006, AM J PSYCHIAT, V163, P381, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.3.381 Arnett JJ, 2000, AM PSYCHOL, V55, P469, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 Beard KW, 2001, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V4, P377, DOI 10.1089/109493101300210286 Blinka L, 2007, CESK PSYCHOL, V51, P169 Charlton JP, 2004, ADV INFO COMM TECH, V4, P59 Chou TJ, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P663, DOI 10.1089/109493103322725469 Griffiths M, 2000, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V3, P211, DOI 10.1089/109493100316067 Griffiths MD, 2004, J ADOLESCENCE, V27, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.10.007 GROHOL JM, 2005, INTERNET ADDICTION G Macek, 2003, ADOLESCENCE Ng BD, 2005, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V8, P110, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.110 Whang LSM, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P592, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.592 Wolfendale J., 2006, CYBERSPACE 2005, P305, DOI [10.1037/a0031607, DOI 10.1037/A0031607] Yee N, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P772, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772 Yee N, 2006, PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AUG, V15, P309, DOI 10.1162/pres.15.3.309 YOUNG GL, 1996, EVIDENCE BASED MED, V1, P44 Young K. S., 1995, INTERNET ADDICTION S NR 17 TC 133 Z9 144 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD DEC PY 2008 VL 11 IS 6 BP 715 EP 718 DI 10.1089/cpb.2007.0210 WC Communication; Psychology, Applied SC Communication; Psychology ER PT J AU Baker, JR Moore, SM AF Baker, James R. Moore, Susan M. TI An Opportunistic Validation of Studies on the Psychosocial Benefits of Blogging SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Article ID ADOLESCENTS AB The authors conducted two studies on the characteristics of bloggers and the psychosocial effects of blogging, both published in CyberPsychology and Behavior. The publication of the first article attracted considerable multinational media attention with over 70 incidents of press coverage in the first 3 weeks after publication. As a consequence, commentary on the research emerged on 167 blogs in the same time period. Many of the comments surrounded the validity of the research findings, and thus an opportunity arose to re-evaluate the research outcomes based on the unsolicited responses posted by bloggers. This report outlines the methodology used to evaluate responses to the initial research, and discusses potential future applications of this approach. C1 [Baker, James R.; Moore, Susan M.] Swinburne Univ, Fac Life & Social Sci, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia. C3 Swinburne University of Technology RP Moore, SM (corresponding author), Swinburne Univ, Fac Life & Social Sci, POB 218, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia. EM smoore@swin.edu.au CR ANTHONY K, 2004, COUNSELLING PSYCHOTH, V15, P38 Baker JR, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P81, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9930 Baker JR, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P747, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0053 Charmaz K, 2006, BROKERAGE CLOSURE IN Denzin N.K., 1999, HDB QUALITATIVE RES Fullwood C, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P685, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2009.0138 Glaser B., 1978, THEORETICAL SENSITIV Hollenbaugh EE, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P13, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0403 LABATE L, 1991, AM J PSYCHOTHER, V45, P87, DOI 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1991.45.1.87 Lenhart Amanda, 2007, TEENS PRIVACY ONLINE Lepore SJ, 1997, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V73, P1030, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.1030 Pedersen S, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V12, P1472, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00382.x *PERS, 2003, BLOGG ICEB Reckwitz A., 2002, NIEMAN REPORTS, V5, P243 Sifry D., 2007, STATE LIVE WEB TREVINO EM, 2005, 6 ANN C ASS INT RES Valkenburg PM, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P584, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584 van den Eijnden RJJM, 2008, DEV PSYCHOL, V44, P655, DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.655 NR 18 TC 2 Z9 2 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD JUN PY 2011 VL 14 IS 6 BP 387 EP 390 DI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0202 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Elhai, JD Montag, C AF Elhai, Jon D. Montag, Christian TI The compatibility of theoretical frameworks with machine learning analyses in psychological research SO CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Article ID VARIABLE SELECTION; PERSPECTIVES; PREDICTION; ACCURATE AB Supervised machine learning has been increasingly used in psychology and psychiatry research. Machine learning offers an important advantage over traditional statistical analyses: statistical model training in example data to enhance predictions in external test data. Additional advantages include advanced, improved statistical algorithms, and empirical methods to select a smaller set of predictor variables. Yet machine learning researchers often use large numbers of predictor variables, without using theory to guide variable selection. Such approach leads to Type I error, spurious findings, and decreased generalizability. We discuss the importance of theory to the psychology field. We offer suggestions for using theory to drive variable selection and data analyses using machine learning in psychological research, including an example from the cyberpsychology field. C1 [Elhai, Jon D.] Univ Toledo, Dept Psychol, 2801 West Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA. [Elhai, Jon D.] Univ Toledo, Dept Psychiat, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH 43614 USA. [Montag, Christian] Ulm Univ, Inst Psychol & Educ, Dept Mol Psychol, D-89081 Ulm, Germany. [Montag, Christian] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Chengdu Brain Sci Inst, Clin Hosp, NeuSCAN Lab, Chengdu, Peoples R China. [Montag, Christian] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Key Lab Neuroinformat, Chengdu, Peoples R China. C3 University System of Ohio; University of Toledo; University System of Ohio; University of Toledo; Ulm University; University of Electronic Science & Technology of China; University of Electronic Science & Technology of China RP Elhai, JD (corresponding author), Univ Toledo, Dept Psychol, 2801 West Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA.; Elhai, JD (corresponding author), Univ Toledo, Dept Psychiat, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH 43614 USA. EM contact@jon-elhai.com CR Alpaydin E., 2020, INTRO MACHINE LEARNI Amancio DR, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0094137 Auer M, INT J MENT HLTH ADDI Bainter SA, 2020, ADV METH PRACT PSYCH, V3, P66, DOI 10.1177/2515245919885617 Beam AL, 2018, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V319, P1317, DOI 10.1001/jama.2017.18391 Blanca MJ, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02558 Brand M, 2019, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V104, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032 Brand M, 2016, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V71, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033 Cai J, 2018, NEUROCOMPUTING, V300, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.077 Chen MY, 2019, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V101, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.021 Cui ZX, 2018, NEUROIMAGE, V178, P622, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.001 D'Alfonso S, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.005 Delgadillo J, 2020, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V88, P14, DOI 10.1037/ccp0000476 Dwyer DB, 2018, ANNU REV CLIN PSYCHO, V14, P91, DOI [10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816045037, 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045037] Elhai J.D., BRAZ J PSYCHIAT Elhai JD, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V36, pIV, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.11.001 Elhai JD, 2020, ADDICT BEHAV, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106261 Fabbri C, 2018, PROG NEURO-PSYCHOPH, V81, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.10.005 Friese M, PSYCHOL METHODS Gradus JL, 2020, JAMA PSYCHIAT, V77, P25, DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2905 Grassi M, 2018, J ALZHEIMERS DIS, V61, P1555, DOI 10.3233/JAD-170547 Gruda D, 2019, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V98, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.020 Guidotti R, 2019, ACM COMPUT SURV, V51, DOI 10.1145/3236009 Jacobucci R, PERSPECT PSYCHOLL SC Jing YK, 2020, DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEN, V206, DOI 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107605 Jordan MI, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P255, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa8415 Kuhn M., 2022, CARET CLASSIFICATION Kuhn M., 2013, APPL PREDICTIVE MODE, V26, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3/COVER] Kuhn M, 2008, J STAT SOFTW, V28, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v028.i05 Kwan JLY, 2018, PSYCHOL METHODS, V23, P262, DOI 10.1037/met0000160 Lachowicz MJ, 2018, PSYCHOL METHODS, V23, P244, DOI 10.1037/met0000165 Leightley D, 2019, J MENT HEALTH, V28, P34, DOI 10.1080/09638237.2018.1521946 Liang X, STRUCT EQU MODEL MUL Marengo D, 2019, STUD NEUROSCI, P109, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-31620-4_7 Mohri M., 2018, ADAPTIVE COMPUTATION Mottus R, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL Muthukrishna M, 2019, NAT HUM BEHAV, V3, P221, DOI 10.1038/s41562-018-0522-1 Oberauer K, 2019, PSYCHON B REV, V26, P1596, DOI 10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2 Peres FAP, 2018, COMPUT IND ENG, V115, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2017.12.006 Proschan MA, 2020, STAT MED, V39, P1407, DOI 10.1002/sim.8463 R Core Team, 2020, R LANG ENV STAT COMP Saleh AKME, 2019, STAT OPTIM INF COMPU, V7 Savci M, CURR PSYCHOL Serang S, 2017, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V24, P733, DOI 10.1080/10705511.2017.1311775 Shatte ABR, 2019, PSYCHOL MED, V49, P1426, DOI 10.1017/S0033291719000151 Shrout PE, 2018, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V69, P487, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845 Tackett JL, 2019, ANNU REV CLIN PSYCHO, V15, P579, DOI 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095710 Tsamardinos I, 2018, MACH LEARN, V107, P1895, DOI 10.1007/s10994-018-5714-4 Wagenmakers EJ, 2012, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V7, P632, DOI 10.1177/1745691612463078 Walsh CG, 2018, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V59, P1261, DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12916 Wang Y, 2018, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V114, P246, DOI 10.1037/pspa0000098 Zilcha-Mano S, 2018, AM J GERIAT PSYCHIAT, V26, P669, DOI 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.01.001 Zou H, 2005, J R STAT SOC B, V67, P301, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x NR 53 TC 14 Z9 14 PU ELSEVIER PI AMSTERDAM PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS PD DEC PY 2020 VL 36 BP 83 EP 88 DI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.002 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Kuaik, ID Laura, M Perugini, L Solano, AC AF Diaz Kuaik, Iliana Laura, Maria Perugini, Lupano Castro Solano, Alejandro TI Theoretical Models and Evaluation Methods of Online Self-presentation SO ACTA PSIQUIATRICA Y PSICOLOGICA DE AMERICA LATINA LA Spanish DT Article DE Internet; Self-Disclosure; Impression Management; Review; Techniques ID IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; DARK TRIAD; FACEBOOK; PERSONALITY; DISCLOSURE; IDENTITY; PREDICTORS; NARCISSISM; INTERNET AB The present work aims to offer a theoretical and methodological approach on self-presentation in cyberpsychology. The study of this phenomenon, of interest to multiple disciplines, includes a wide spectrum of definitions, theoretical models and evaluation methods that require review. First, the origin and differentiation of the term self-presentation from other related terms is examined. Next, a theoretical journey is made on the concept of self-presentation and the main models used to explain and address this phenomenon. Finally, the different methodologies used in research are presented, their advantages and limitations when applied in the evaluation of online self-presentation. C1 [Diaz Kuaik, Iliana] Univ Palermo UP, Univ Buenos Aires UBA, Magister Psicodiagnost & Evaluac Psicol, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [Laura, Maria; Perugini, Lupano] Univ Palermo UP, Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn UP CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [Castro Solano, Alejandro] Univ Palermo, Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn UP CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina. C3 University of Buenos Aires RP Kuaik, ID (corresponding author), Mario Bravo 1259, RA-1175 Buenos Aires, Argentina. EM ilianadiazk@gmail.com CR Altman I., 1973, SOCIAL PENETRATION D Antheunis ML, 2020, MEDIA PSYCHOL, V23, P820, DOI 10.1080/15213269.2019.1648217 Appel M, 2018, J MEDIA PSYCHOL-GER, V30, P160, DOI 10.1027/1864-1105/a000192 Arcila C., 2010, COMUNICACION SOCIAL, V3, P139 Arkin R. M, 1981, IMPRESSION MANAGEMEN, P311, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-685180-9.50020-8 Attrill A, 2015, PALG STUD CYBERPSYCH, P1, DOI 10.1057/9781137483416 Bareket-Bojmel L, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V55, P788, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.033 BAUMEISTER RF, 1995, PSYCHOL BULL, V117, P497, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 Bolino MC, 1999, ORGAN RES METHODS, V2, P187, DOI 10.1177/109442819922005 Bronstein J, 2013, ASLIB PROC, V65, P161, DOI 10.1108/00012531311313989 Camargo-Vega JJ, 2014, REV FACING TUNJA, V24, P63, DOI [10.19053/01211129.3159, DOI 10.19053/01211129.3159] Campbell JD, 1996, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V70, P141, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.141 Casado-Riera C., 2018, ALOMA REV PSICOLOGIA, V36, P23 Choi Y., 2020, MOODYS ANALYTICS, P1 Costa P. T., 1985, ADV PERSONALITY ASSE, V4, P31 Diaz Kuaik I, 2020, MEM 12 C INT INV PRA, P50 Ellison NB, 2012, NEW MEDIA SOC, V14, P45, DOI 10.1177/1461444811410395 Fernandez Ballesteros R, 2013, EVALUACION PSICOLOGI Fox J, 2015, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V76, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.017 FRIEDLANDER ML, 1985, J COUNS PSYCHOL, V32, P483, DOI 10.1037/0022-0167.32.4.483 Goffman E., 1981, PRESENTACION PERSONA Goldberg L., 1992, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V4, P26, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 Hart W, 2020, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109649 Hearn A, 2017, POP COMMUN, V15, P62, DOI 10.1080/15405702.2016.1269909 Hernandez Sampieri R., 2014, METODOLOGIA INVESTIG Higgins ET, 1997, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V72, P515, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515 HIGGINS ET, 1985, SOC COGNITION, V3, P51, DOI 10.1521/soco.1985.3.1.51 Hollenbaugh EE, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V30, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.055 Jones E.E., 1982, PSYCHOL PERSPECTIVES, V1, P231 KATZ E, 1973, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V37, P508 Kim J., 2011, COMPUTER MEDIATED CO, P156, DOI DOI 10.3726/B12772 LEARY MR, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P34, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34 LEAVY SA, 1993, PSYCHOANAL QUART, V62, P400, DOI 10.1080/21674086.1993.11927386 Lee SJ, 1999, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V26, P701, DOI 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00178-0 Lin RY, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V70, P426, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.012 Linne J., 2015, REV GUILLERMO OCKHAM, V3, P65 Linne Joaquín, 2019, Ultima décad., V27, P96 Perugini MLL, 2019, ACTA PSIQUIAT PSICOL, V65, P5 MARKUS H, 1986, AM PSYCHOL, V41, P954, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954 Marra e Rosa Gabriel Artur, 2016, Revista de Psicología, V34, P313, DOI 10.18800/psico.201602.004 Marshall TC, 2015, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V85, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.039 Michikyan M, 2015, EMERG ADULTHOOD, V3, P55, DOI 10.1177/2167696814532442 Moinian F, 2006, CHILDHOOD, V13, P49, DOI 10.1177/0907568206058610 Nichols A.L., 2020, WILEY ENCY PERSONALI, V1, P397, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119547143.CH66 NOWAK A, 1990, PSYCHOL REV, V97, P362, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.362 Papacharissi Z, 2011, COMMUN SOC-SER, P212 Paulhus DL, 2002, J RES PERS, V36, P556, DOI 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6 Rosenberg J, 2011, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V17, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01560.x Schlenker B. R., 2012, HDB SELF IDENTITY, V2, P542 SCHLENKER BR, 1986, PUBLIC SELF PRIVATE, P21, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-9564-5_2 Seidman G, 2013, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V54, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009 Solano A. C., 2019, REV IBEROAM DIAGN EV, V4, P79, DOI 10.21865/ Tangney J.P., 2012, HDB SELF IDENTITY, V2nd edn. Tedeschi J.T., 1984, RES SOCIOLOGY ORG, P31 Twomey C, 2017, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V20, P587, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2017.0247 van Dijck J, 2013, MEDIA CULT SOC, V35, P199, DOI 10.1177/0163443712468605 Walther JB, 1996, COMMUN RES, V23, P3, DOI 10.1177/009365096023001001 Walther JB, 2021, J LANG SOC PSYCHOL, V40, P120, DOI 10.1177/0261927X20967703 Wheeless L.R., 1977, HUM COMMUN RES, V3, P250, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2958.1977.TB00523.X, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00523.x] Yang CC, 2016, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V45, P402, DOI 10.1007/s10964-015-0385-y NR 60 TC 0 Z9 0 PU FUNDACION ACTA PI BUENOS AIRES PA FONDO PARA LA SALUD MENTAL MALABIA 2274 13 A, BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA PD MAR PY 2022 VL 68 IS 1 BP 14 EP 26 WC Psychology, Applied; Psychiatry SC Psychology; Psychiatry ER PT J AU March, E Szymczak, P Smoker, M Jonason, PK AF March, Evita Szymczak, Piotr Smoker, Melissa Jonason, Peter K. TI Who cyberstalked their sexual and romantic partners? Sex differences, dark personality traits, and fundamental social motives SO CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Article DE Dark tetrad; Social motives; Sex differences; Cyberstalking; Cyberpsychology ID PERPETRATION; STALKING AB In this brief report, we examined (N = 449; 50.1% men) the role of the Dark Tetrad traits (i.e., psychopathy, sadism, narcissism, and Machiavellianism) and Fundamental Social Motives (i.e., social bonds, status, safety, mate-seeking, mate-retention, pathogen avoidance, family, and autonomy) in relation to self-reported perpetration of cyberstalking short-term and long-term intimate partners. Women were more likely to cyberstalk long-term partners, those with higher levels of Dark Tetrad traits were more likely to cyberstalk their partners regardless of relationship context, and Fundamental Social Motives only played a minor role. Results highlight the importance of exploring intimate partner cyberstalking across different relationship contexts. C1 [March, Evita; Jonason, Peter K.] Federat Univ Australia, Ballarat, Vic, Australia. [Szymczak, Piotr] Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski Univ, Warsaw, Poland. [Smoker, Melissa] Inst Social Neurosci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. [Jonason, Peter K.] Univ Padua, Padua, Italy. C3 Federation University Australia; Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw; University of Padua RP March, E (corresponding author), Federat Univ Australia, Ballarat, Vic, Australia. EM e.march@federation.edu.au FU National Science Centre of Poland [2019/35/B/HS6/00682] FX The second and fourth author were partially funded by a grant from the National Science Centre of Poland (2019/35/B/HS6/00682). Data for this study was collected as part of a thesis for the 3rd author. CR Burke SC, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1162, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.010 BUSS DM, 1993, PSYCHOL REV, V100, P204, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204 Chabrol H, 2009, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V47, P734, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020 Dressing H, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P61, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0231 Hamin Z, 2018, INT J CYBER CRIMINOL, V12, P316, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.1467931 Jonason PK, 2019, J SOC PSYCHOL, V159, P371, DOI 10.1080/00224545.2018.1529652 Jones DN., 2017, EVOL PSYCHOL SCI, V3, P10, DOI [10.1007/s40806-016-0070-8, DOI 10.1007/S40806-016-0070-8] Kaur P, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120426 March E, 2020, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110084 Marcum CD, 2019, AM J CRIM JUSTICE, V44, P645, DOI 10.1007/s12103-019-09482-8 Minghui Gao, 2016, International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, V6, P13, DOI 10.4018/IJCBPL.2016100102 Neel R, 2016, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V110, P887, DOI 10.1037/pspp0000068 Paulhus DL, 2021, EUR J PSYCHOL ASSESS, V37, P208, DOI 10.1027/1015-5759/a000602 Reyns BW, 2019, VICTIMS OFFENDERS, V14, P183, DOI 10.1080/15564886.2018.1557092 Reyns BW, 2012, DEVIANT BEHAV, V33, P1, DOI 10.1080/01639625.2010.538364 Santos I, 2023, COMPARE, V53, P269, DOI 10.1080/03057925.2021.1906206 Smoker M, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V72, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.012 Spitzberg BH, 2007, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V12, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.001 NR 18 TC 3 Z9 3 PU SPRINGER PI NEW YORK PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES PD APR PY 2023 VL 42 IS 10 BP 7848 EP 7851 DI 10.1007/s12144-021-02174-9 EA AUG 2021 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Orlov, VA AF Orlov, Vladimir A. TI The Seventh Conference in Memory of M.Yu. Kondratiev: International Forum of Specialists in the Field of Solving Socio-Psychological Problems SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIETY LA Russian DT Article DE conference; social psychology; personality; education; family; psychological training; cyberpsychology; ethnopsychology; organizational psychology; road traffic AB The article presents a report on the work of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference in memory of M. Yu. Kondratiev "Social Psychology: Issues of Theory and Practice", held on May 12-13, 2022 at Moscow State University of Psychology & Education. The main events of the forum are reflected. The significance of the conference for the development of promisingareas of socio-psychological research, as well as their practical application, is shown. The importance of exchanging the experience between researchers from various scientific schools for solving urgent socio-psychological problems of teaching and educating a developing personality is represented. C1 [Orlov, Vladimir A.] Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Dept Social Psychol, Moscow, Russia. C3 Moscow State University of Psychology & Education RP Orlov, VA (corresponding author), Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Dept Social Psychol, Moscow, Russia. EM vladimirorlov@bk.ru CR [Anonymous], 2022, MATERIALY 7 MEZHDUNA Kochetkov NV, 2021, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V12, P217, DOI 10.17759/sps.2021120213 Krushelnitskaya OB, 2016, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V7, P9, DOI 10.17759/sps.2016070102 NR 3 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MOSCOW STATE UNIV PSYCHOLOGY & EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2022 VL 13 IS 2 BP 216 EP 222 DI 10.17759/sps.2022130215 WC Psychology, Applied SC Psychology ER PT J AU Martinez-Corcoles, M Teichmann, M Murdvee, M AF Martinez-Corcoles, Mario Teichmann, Mare Murdvee, Mart TI Assessing technophobia and technophilia: Development and validation of a questionnaire SO TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY LA English DT Article DE Technophobia; Technophilia; Cyberpsychology; Cyberphobia; Technostress; Computer anxiety ID OF-FIT INDEXES; COMPUTER ANXIETY; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; PERSONALITY; MODELS AB Nowadays technology is in every aspect of our lives. The exponential growth of new information technologies during recent years has increased society's enthusiasm and visionary expectations (technophilia), as well as fears and discomfort (technophobia). However, technophobia and technophilia are two concepts that are hardly studied, with very few specific measurements developed so far. The present paper aims to develop and validate the Technophobia and Technophilia Questionnaire (TTQ) in a sample composed of 534 participants from two different countries (Poland and Estonia). Practical implications, study limitations and directions for future research are discussed. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. C1 [Martinez-Corcoles, Mario; Teichmann, Mare; Murdvee, Mart] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Software Sci, Akad Tee X-333, EE-12616 Tallinn, Estonia. C3 Tallinn University of Technology RP Martinez-Corcoles, M (corresponding author), Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Software Sci, Akad Tee X-333, EE-12616 Tallinn, Estonia. EM mario.martinez-corcoles@ttu.ee; mare@pekonsult.ee; mart.murdvee@pekonsult.ee CR Anthony LM, 2000, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V16, P31, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00050-3 Bader Christopher., 2017, PARANORMAL AM GHOST Beckers JJ, 2001, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V17, P35, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00036-4 Benbasat I, 2007, J ASSOC INF SYST, V8, P211, DOI 10.17705/1jais.00126 Thatcher JB, 2007, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V44, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2006.11.007 BROWNE MW, 1992, SOCIOL METHOD RES, V21, P230, DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005 BROWNE MW, 1992, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V27, P269, DOI 10.1207/s15327906mbr2702_13 Chen FF, 2007, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V14, P464, DOI 10.1080/10705510701301834 Cheung GW, 2002, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V9, P233, DOI 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 Coulthard Darryl, 2012, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, V10, P262, DOI 10.1108/14779961211285881 Hogan M, 2009, INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT: CHALLENGES IN PRACTICE, THEORY AND EDUCATION, VOLS 1AND 2, P117, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_10 Jay T. B., 1981, Educational Technology, V21, P47 Joreskog K. G., 2006, LISREL VERSION 8 80 Kline R.B., 2005, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, V2nd Lloret-Segura S, 2014, AN PSICOL-SPAIN, V30, P1151, DOI 10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361 Marsh H. W., 2005, CONT PSYCHOMETRICS F, P225 Nickell G. S., 1986, Computers in Human Behaviour, V2, P301, DOI 10.1016/0747-5632(86)90010-5 Nunnally J, 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC METHODS Nunnally J. C., 1994, PSYCHOM THEORY, V3rd Osiceanu ME, 2015, PROCD SOC BEHV, V180, P1137, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.229 Podsakoff PM, 2003, J APPL PSYCHOL, V88, P879, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 RAY NM, 1990, HUM FACTORS, V32, P477, DOI 10.1177/001872089003200409 ROSEN L, 1992, MEASURING TECHNOPHOB Rosen L. D., 1990, Collegiate Microcomputer, V8, P275 Rosen L. D., 1990, ANXIETY RES, V3, P175, DOI DOI 10.1080/08917779008248751 ROSEN LD, 1987, BEHAV RES METH INSTR, V19, P167, DOI 10.3758/BF03203781 Sass DA, 2010, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V45, P73, DOI 10.1080/00273170903504810 Schein E. H., 1992, ORG CULTURE LEADERSH SIEVERT ME, 1988, INFORM TECHNOL LIBR, V7, P243 Tekinarslan E, 2008, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V24, P1572, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.011 Weil M. M., 1997, TECHNOSTRESS COPING WEIL MM, 1995, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V11, P95, DOI 10.1016/0747-5632(94)00026-E WIDAMAN KF, 1985, APPL PSYCH MEAS, V9, P1, DOI 10.1177/014662168500900101 NR 34 TC 28 Z9 32 PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND PD NOV PY 2017 VL 51 BP 183 EP 188 DI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.007 WC Social Issues; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary SC Social Issues; Social Sciences - Other Topics ER PT C AU de Rosa, AS Bocci, E Salvati, M Latini, M Bonito, M Carpignano, N Nubola, A Palombi, T Tovo, G AF de Rosa, Annamaria Silvana Bocci, Elena Salvati, Marco Latini, Martina Bonito, Mattia Carpignano, Nicola Nubola, Antonio Palombi, Tommaso Tovo, Giampaolo BE Chova, LG Martinez, AL Torres, IC TI TRANSVERSAL POLARISED DISCOURSE ABOUT "IMMIGRATION" THROUGH MULTIPLE SOCIAL MEDIA: TWITTER, FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM, YOUTUBE SO 14TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2020) SE INTED Proceedings LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Social media; multi-agents discourse; immigration; polarised social representations; ideological and political positioning ID REPRESENTATIONS AB The contribution is part of a wide research program on migratory experiences and discourse, articulated in "field" and "multi-media" studies. The media studies are aimed at reconstructing the "multi-voices" and "multi-agents" discourses about the contemporary migratory phenomenon: a) the scientific discourse (by experts), b) the political-institutional discourse (by policy makers, political leaders, institutions, NGO, etc.), c) the social discourse by journalists; d) the discourse "for" or "by" lay people. The research material of the multi-media studies includes 6739 sources - currently increasing with new waves of data collection - based on: a) the international scientific literature, inspired by the social representations theory and other theories in social sciences; b) the discourse driven by or leading the institutional policies (at national and supranational level); c) the discourse by "journalists" in the Italian online press of different political orientation (La Repubblica, Il Fatto Quotidiano, Il Mattino, Libero) and broadcast (SKY Tg24); d. the communication "for" and "among" the citizens in the various scenarios of the social networks (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube). Systematic content, thematic and statistical analyses are based on multidimensional analysis supported by multiple software (IRAMUTEQ for Descending Hierarchical Classification and Specificities and Correspondence Analysis, SPAD for Correspondence Analysis, GraphColl for Network Analysis, Analysis of images and Videos, Sentiment Analysis, etc.). A selection of the results from the media studies will be presented regarding the communication "for" and "among" the citizens in various scenarios of the social networks (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube). The results selected for this contribution will provide the reconstruction of the social discourse about "immigration-migration" through multiple social media, transversally obtained by multidimensional analyses conducted on 4118 sources related to international and national sources regarding the period 2013-2018, characterised by the different geo-political governmental scenarios: 1958 posts from Twitter, 1197 from Facebook, 456 from Instagram and 507 from YouTube. Cross-results through the four social media show empirical evidence of the consistency of the highly polarised discourse depending on the ideological political positioning of the multi-voices and multi-agents social actors. The educational relevance of the study based on the construction of a "hot" societal issue through different social networks is in line with recent acquisitions of the "cyber-psychology". The reflection of the psychology of new media underlines how the hybrid nature of social networks makes them both opportunities and problems in co-building, spreading and sharing knowledge. This study contributes to educational benefits by providing empirical evidence about the dynamics between communicative engineering and creation/manipulation of the social consensus. It may improves awareness about the role played by the social media as powerful "echo chamber" of the institutional and political discourse leading to opposite inclusive/exclusive policies, and as the environment where it takes place the negotiation and development of polemical social representations around the theme of immigration. C1 [de Rosa, Annamaria Silvana; Bocci, Elena; Salvati, Marco; Latini, Martina; Bonito, Mattia; Carpignano, Nicola; Nubola, Antonio; Palombi, Tommaso; Tovo, Giampaolo] Sapienza Univ Rome, Rome, Italy. C3 Sapienza University Rome RP de Rosa, AS (corresponding author), Sapienza Univ Rome, Rome, Italy. CR Allievi S., 2018, IMMIGRAZIONE CAMBIAR Balbutin S., 2019, POLITICAL EC SELF CO, P92 Calzeroni P., 2019, NARCISISMO DIGITALE Cardon P., 2019, NEW MEDIA SOC, V21, P1656, DOI [10.1177/1461444819831987, DOI 10.1177/1461444819831987] de Rosa AS, 2019, INTED PROC, P2122 de Rosa A.S., 2020, TWITTER ECHO CHAMBER de Rosa AS, 2018, PAP SOC REPRESENT, V27 de Rosa AS., 2012, SOCIAL REPRESENTATIO, DOI [10.4324/9780203102138, DOI 10.4324/9780203102138] Howarth C, 2006, BRIT J SOC PSYCHOL, V45, P65, DOI 10.1348/014466605X43777 Kadianaki I, 2018, PEACE CONFL, V24, P407, DOI 10.1037/pac0000285 Kreis R, 2017, DISCOURSE COMMUN, V11, P498, DOI 10.1177/1750481317714121 Lebart L., 1989, SYSTEME PORTABLE LAN Lebart L., 2000, STAT EXPLORATOIRE MU Lu BZ, 2016, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V34, P416, DOI 10.1177/0894439315595222 Mejova Y., 2015, TWITTER DIGITAL SOCI Moscovici S, 1995, CAHIERS INT PSYCHOL, V28, P15 Moscovici S., 1961, PSYCHANALYSE SON IMA Murphy D., 2018, TWITTER SOCIAL COMMU Riva G., 2016, I SOCIAL NETWORKS Riva Giuseppe., 2018, FAKE NEWS Ruggiano F., 2016, IMAGO J, DOI [10.7413/22818138067, DOI 10.7413/22818138067] Van Dijk A, 2009, BALLETTANZ, P62 van Dijk T. A., 2011, DISCOURSE STUDIES MU, P379 NR 23 TC 5 Z9 5 PU IATED-INT ASSOC TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT PI VALENICA PA LAURI VOLPI 6, VALENICA, BURJASSOT 46100, SPAIN PY 2020 BP 3257 EP 3267 WC Education & Educational Research SC Education & Educational Research ER PT J AU Parsons, TD AF Parsons, Thomas D. TI Ethical Challenges of Using Virtual Environments in the Assessment and Treatment of Psychopathological Disorders SO JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE LA English DT Review DE ethics; virtual reality; technologies of the extended mind; cyberpsychology; digital psychology; algorithmic devices ID REALITY EXPOSURE THERAPY; EXTENDED MIND; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT; ANXIETY DISORDERS; DELPHI POLL; TECHNOLOGIES; ACROPHOBIA; ISSUES; PHOBIAS AB Clinicians are increasingly interested in the potential of virtual environments for research and praxes. Virtual environments include both immersive and non-immersive simulations of everyday activities. Moreover, algorithmic devices and adaptive virtual environments allow clinicians a medium for personalizing technologies to their patients. There is also increasing recognition of social virtual environments that connect virtual environments to social networks. Although there has been a great deal of deliberation on these novel technologies for assessment and treatment, less discourse has occurred around the ethical challenges that may ensue when these technologies are applied clinically. In this paper, some of the ethical issues involved in the clinical use of novel technologies are discussed. C1 [Parsons, Thomas D.] Univ North Texas, iCtr Affect Technol iCAN, Denton, TX 76207 USA. [Parsons, Thomas D.] Univ North Texas, Computat Neuropsychol & Simulat CNS, Denton, TX 76207 USA. [Parsons, Thomas D.] Univ North Texas, Coll Informat, Denton, TX 76207 USA. C3 University of North Texas System; University of North Texas Denton; University of North Texas System; University of North Texas Denton; University of North Texas System; University of North Texas Denton RP Parsons, TD (corresponding author), Univ North Texas, iCtr Affect Technol iCAN, Denton, TX 76207 USA.; Parsons, TD (corresponding author), Univ North Texas, Computat Neuropsychol & Simulat CNS, Denton, TX 76207 USA.; Parsons, TD (corresponding author), Univ North Texas, Coll Informat, Denton, TX 76207 USA. EM thomas.parsons@unt.edu CR Aardema F, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P653 Aardema F, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P429, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0164 Adams D, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH SYMPOSIUM ON USABLE PRIVACY AND SECURITY, P427 Allied Control Council, 1949, TRIALS WAR CRIM American Counseling Association, 1999, ETH STAND INT ONL CO American Psychological Association, 2005, **NON-TRADITIONAL**, DOI DOI 10.1002/HEP.20933 American Psychological Association, AM PSYCH ASS ETH PRI American Telemedicine Association,, PRACTICE GUIDELINES [Anonymous], 2002, Am Psychol, V57, P1060 [Anonymous], 2008, OXFORD TXB CLIN RES Arafat IM, 2016, 22ND ACM CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL REALITY SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY (VRST 2016), P51, DOI 10.1145/2993369.2993383 Balan O, 2020, SENSORS-BASEL, V20, DOI 10.3390/s20020496 Beauchamp T.L., 2001, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA Behr KM, 2005, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V14, P668, DOI 10.1162/105474605775196535 Bierig R., 2020, P 2020 12 INT C QUAL, P1 Bos JE, 2008, DISPLAYS, V29, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.002 Botella C, 2017, CURR PSYCHIAT REP, V19, DOI 10.1007/s11920-017-0788-4 Bray A, 2008, AUSTRALAS PSYCHIATRY, V16, P8, DOI 10.1080/10398560701636930 Brey P., 1999, Ethics and Information Technology, V1, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010069907461 Cao ZK, 2018, 25TH 2018 IEEE CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL REALITY AND 3D USER INTERFACES (VR), P105 Carl E, 2019, J ANXIETY DISORD, V61, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003 Carter JA, 2016, J AM PHILOS ASSOC, V2, P542, DOI 10.1017/apa.2016.28 Chang E, 2013, INT WINT WORKSH BR, P62, DOI 10.1109/IWW-BCI.2013.6506631 Cheshire W. P., 2010, ETHICS MED, V26, P137 Cieslik B, 2020, COMPLEMENT THER MED, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102480 Clark A, 1998, ANALYSIS, V58, P7, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00096 Clark A, 2011, PHILOS STUD, V152, P413, DOI 10.1007/s11098-010-9597-x Cobb SVG, 1999, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V8, P169, DOI 10.1162/105474699566152 Coelho CM, 2009, J ANXIETY DISORD, V23, P563, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.01.014 Colombetti G, 2015, PHILOS STUD, V172, P1243, DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0347-3 Dattilio FM, 2012, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V68, P146, DOI 10.1002/jclp.21831 David S, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN OF COMMUNICATION (ISDOC2014), P1, DOI 10.1145/2618168.2618169 Davis S, 2015, P 11 AUSTR C INT ENT Dennett Danile C, 2008, KINDS MINDS UNDERSTA Diemer J, 2016, J ANXIETY DISORD, V37, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.10.007 Drexler J., 1994, P IM 7 C TUCS AZ US Dunn LB, 2006, AM J PSYCHIAT, V163, P500, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.3.500 Elhai JD, 2015, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V46, P444, DOI 10.1037/pro0000054 Ewell PJ, 2016, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V19, P435, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2015.0207 Fassbender E., 2006, J COMPUTATIONAL INFO, V2, P457 Fernandez-Alvarez J, 2020, ADV EXP MED BIOL, V1191, P389, DOI 10.1007/978-981-32-9705-0_21 Freeman D, 2017, PSYCHOL MED, V47, P2393, DOI 10.1017/S003329171700040X Freeman D, 2018, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V5, P625, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30226-8 Froese T, 2014, SCI REP-UK, V4, DOI 10.1038/srep03672 Goncalves R, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048469 Harman J, 2001, CHI 01 EXTENDED ABST, P407, DOI DOI 10.1145/634067.634306 Heimo O.I., 2014, P 2014 IEEE INT S ET, P1 Henderson GE, 2007, PLOS MED, V4, P1735, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040324 Hoffman GA, 2016, PHILOS PSYCHOL, V29, P1160, DOI 10.1080/09515089.2016.1236369 Horigome T, 2020, PSYCHOL MED, V50, P2487, DOI 10.1017/S0033291720003785 International Society of Mental Health, ONL SUGG PRINC ONL P Islam R, 2020, 2020 IEEE CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL REALITY AND 3D USER INTERFACES WORKSHOPS (VRW 2020), P559, DOI [10.1109/VRW50115.2020.0-145, 10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00131] Jund T, 2016, IEEE INT CONF ADV LE, P533, DOI 10.1109/ICALT.2016.77 Kade D, 2016, PHILOSOPHIES, V1, P73, DOI 10.3390/philosophies1010073 Kelly JT, 2020, J MED INTERNET RES, V22, DOI 10.2196/20135 Kim YY, 2005, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V42, P616, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00349.x Kothgassner OD, 2021, NEUROPSYCHIATRIE, V35, P68, DOI 10.1007/s40211-020-00349-7 Kourtesis P, 2019, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V13, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00342 Krijn M, 2004, BEHAV RES THER, V42, P229, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00139-6 Krohn S, 2020, J MED INTERNET RES, V22, DOI 10.2196/16724 Krokos E, 2019, VIRTUAL REAL-LONDON, V23, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10055-018-0346-3 Krokos E, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND AUTOMATION ENGINEERING (ICCAE 2018), P27, DOI 10.1145/3192975.3193023 Kuntze MF, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P203, DOI 10.1089/109493102760147187 Lee M., 2019, J VIRTUAL REAL BROAD, V14, P1 Legge ELG, 2012, ACTA PSYCHOL, V141, P380, DOI 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.002 Levy F, 2016, J TELEMED TELECARE, V22, P215, DOI 10.1177/1357633X15598243 Lindner P, 2019, J ANXIETY DISORD, V61, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.07.003 Lustgarten SD, 2018, CLIN PSYCHOL-SCI PR, V25, DOI 10.1111/cpsp.12234 Lustgarten SD, 2017, AM PSYCHOL, V72, P159, DOI 10.1037/a0040321 Lv ZH, 2020, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V32, P9593, DOI 10.1007/s00521-019-04472-7 Madary M, 2016, FRONT ROBOT AI, V3, DOI 10.3389/frobt.2016.00003 Meehan M, 2002, ACM T GRAPHIC, V21, P645, DOI 10.1145/566570.566630 Merritt M, 2013, COGN SYST RES, V25-26, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.03.005 Mitrovic D., 2017, FACTA U SERIES LAW P, V15, P115 Modi A., 2017, 171002599 ARXIV Morina N, 2015, BEHAV RES THER, V74, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.010 Nagel SK, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01251 Negut A, 2016, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V30, P165, DOI 10.1080/13854046.2016.1144793 Negut A, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V54, P414, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.029 Norcross JC, 2002, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V33, P316, DOI 10.1037//0735-7028.33.3.316 Norcross JC, 2013, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V44, P363, DOI 10.1037/a0034633 O'Brolchain F, 2016, SCI ENG ETHICS, V22, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11948-014-9621-1 Office for Human Research Protections, THE BELM REP Opris D, 2012, DEPRESS ANXIETY, V29, P85, DOI 10.1002/da.20910 Parsey CM, 2013, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V27, P1328, DOI 10.1080/13854046.2013.834971 Parsons T.D., 2019, ETHICAL CHALLENGES D Parsons T.D., 2021, COMPREHENSIVE CLIN P, V2nd Parsons TD, 2008, J BEHAV THER EXP PSY, V39, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.07.007 Parsons TD, 2021, ETR&D-EDUC TECH RES, V69, P335, DOI 10.1007/s11423-020-09846-6 Parsons TD, 2019, EDUC COMMUN TECHNOL, P195, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-02631-8_11 Parsons TD, 2019, NEUROPSYCHOL REV, V29, P338, DOI 10.1007/s11065-019-09407-6 Parsons TD, 2018, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V32, P16, DOI 10.1080/13854046.2017.1337932 Parsons TD, 2017, J NEUROSCI METH, V291, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.07.027 Parsons TD, 2017, J ALZHEIMERS DIS, V59, P1227, DOI 10.3233/JAD-170295 Parsons TD, 2017, NEUROPSYCHOL REHABIL, V27, P777, DOI 10.1080/09602011.2015.1109524 Peeters A, 2019, CONSCIOUS COGN, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102834 Peterson SM, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0200306 Powers MB, 2008, J ANXIETY DISORD, V22, P561, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.04.006 Raghav K, 2016, BMC ORAL HEALTH, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12903-016-0186-z Ramirez EJ, 2020, SCI ENG ETHICS, V26, P3313, DOI 10.1007/s11948-020-00267-5 Ramirez EJ, 2019, PHILOS PSYCHOL, V32, P211, DOI 10.1080/09515089.2018.1532073 Ramirez EJ, 2018, ETHICS INF TECHNOL, V20, P249, DOI 10.1007/s10676-018-9473-5 Redhead C., 2009, POLIT SCI, V1717, P226 Reger GM, 2016, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V84, P946, DOI 10.1037/ccp0000134 Reiner P. B., 2017, NEUROETHICS ANTICIPA, P108 Renaud P, 2013, J SEX AGGRESS, V19, P102, DOI 10.1080/13552600.2011.617014 Rizzo AS, 2002, STUD NEUROPSYCHOL DE, P243 Saredakis D, 2020, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V14, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096 Shennan G., 2016, INTERACTION J SOLUTI, V8, P7 Slater M., 2020, FRONTIERS VIRTUAL RE, V1, P1, DOI [DOI 10.3389/FRVIR.2020.00001, 10.3389/frvir.2020.00001] Sneddon A, 2002, PHILOS PSYCHOL, V15, P297, DOI 10.1080/0951508021000006102 Southgate E, 2017, P IEEE VIRT REAL ANN, P12, DOI 10.1109/VR.2017.7892226 Spiegel JS, 2018, SCI ENG ETHICS, V24, P1537, DOI 10.1007/s11948-017-9979-y Susanne R.-B., 2018, P HAW INT C SYST SCI Vines J, 2017, INTERACT COMPUT, V29, P27, DOI 10.1093/iwc/iww017 Ward T., 2009, J SEX AGGRESS, V15, P247, DOI DOI 10.1080/13552600903263087 Ward T, 2010, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V15, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.002 WHALLEY LJ, 1995, COMPUT BIOL MED, V25, P107, DOI 10.1016/0010-4825(95)00008-R Wiederhold BK, 2018, IEEE CONSUM ELECTR M, V7, P106, DOI 10.1109/MCE.2017.2715365 Wiederhold BK, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P385, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2014.0202 Wilson R. A., 2015, HDB NEUROETHICS, P423 Woodhead M., 2000, RES CHILDREN PERSPEC World Medical Association World Medical Association, 1964, DECLARATION HELSINKI Wu JW, 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference (iThings) - 2014 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) - 2014 IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical-Social Computing (CPS), P456, DOI 10.1109/iThings.2014.81 Yellowlees PM, 2012, TELEMED E-HEALTH, V18, P558, DOI 10.1089/tmj.2011.0195 Zuromski D, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00705 NR 126 TC 7 Z9 7 PU MDPI PI BASEL PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND PD FEB PY 2021 VL 10 IS 3 AR 378 DI 10.3390/jcm10030378 WC Medicine, General & Internal SC General & Internal Medicine ER PT J AU Lee, SL Park, MSA Tam, CL AF Lee, Soon-Li Park, Miriam Sang-Ah Tam, Cai-Lian TI The relationship between Facebook attachment and obsessive-compulsive disorder severity SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL RESEARCH ON CYBERSPACE LA English DT Article DE Facebook; obsessive-compulsive disorder; obsessive beliefs ID PSYCHIATRIC-SYMPTOMS; INTERNET ADDICTION; CONTROL BELIEFS; RESPONSIBILITY; INDIVIDUALS; NUMBER AB Despite the widespread use of social networking sites (SNS) such as Facebook, an adequate understanding of their impact on the users' mental health is still lacking. The present study intends to expand on the current understanding of the linkage between social networking site use and mental health. Our study explored how Facebook use may be associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), with the inclusion of obsessive-compulsive beliefs as a mediator. One hundred and fifty-six undergraduate students completed the questionnaire given. Overall, Facebook use contributed to OCD severity through obsessive-compulsive beliefs as the mediator. The present study also yielded other relevant results for cyberpsychology that may help pave the way for future studies. C1 [Lee, Soon-Li; Park, Miriam Sang-Ah] Monash Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. [Tam, Cai-Lian] Monash Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Master Profess Counselling, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. C3 Monash University; Monash University Sunway; Monash University; Monash University Sunway RP Lee, SL (corresponding author), Jalan Lagoon Selatan Bandar Sunway, Subang Jaya 47500, Selangor, Malaysia. EM sllee22@student.monash.edu CR Al Omoush KS, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P2387, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.010 Alavi SS, 2011, J RES MED SCI, V16, P793 Anderson B, 2012, PSYCHOL POP MEDIA CU, V1, P23, DOI 10.1037/a0026452 BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 Curtin F, 1998, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V44, P775, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00043-2 Elphinston RA, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P631, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0318 Faull M, 2004, CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, V11, P158, DOI 10.1002/cpp.403 Foa EB, 2002, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V14, P485, DOI 10.1037//1040-3590.14.4.485 FOA EB, 1986, PSYCHOL BULL, V99, P20, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.20 Frost R, 1997, BEHAV RES THER, V35, P667 Ha JH, 2007, PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, V40, P424, DOI 10.1159/000107426 Hofmann W, 2012, PSYCHOL SCI, V23, P582, DOI 10.1177/0956797612437426 HORN JL, 1965, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V30, P179, DOI 10.1007/BF02289447 HUBBARD R, 1987, J BUS RES, V15, P173, DOI 10.1016/0148-2963(84)90047-X Inozu M, 2012, J BEHAV THER EXP PSY, V43, P959, DOI 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.02.004 Jang KS, 2008, J SCHOOL HEALTH, V78, P165, DOI 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00279.x Junco R, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026 KAISER HF, 1970, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V35, P401, DOI 10.1007/BF02291817 KAISER HF, 1974, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V39, P31, DOI 10.1007/BF02291575 LADOUCEUR R, 1995, BEHAV RES THER, V33, P937, DOI 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00024-R Ladouceur R, 1997, BEHAV RES THER, V35, P423, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00117-9 LOPATKA C, 1995, BEHAV RES THER, V33, P673, DOI 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00089-3 MARKS I, 1990, BRIT J ADDICT, V85, P1389 Moreno MA, 2011, DEPRESS ANXIETY, V28, P447, DOI 10.1002/da.20805 Moreno MA, 2012, J BEHAV HEALTH SER R, V39, P295, DOI 10.1007/s11414-011-9258-7 Moulding R, 2007, J ANXIETY DISORD, V21, P677, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.10.001 Moulding R, 2011, ASSESSMENT, V18, P357, DOI 10.1177/1073191110376490 Moulding R, 2009, CAN J BEHAV SCI, V41, P84, DOI 10.1037/a0014840 Ong EYL, 2011, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V50, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.022 Preacher KJ, 2004, BEHAV RES METH INS C, V36, P717, DOI 10.3758/BF03206553 Rosen LD, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P1243, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.012 SALKOVSKIS PM, 1989, BEHAV RES THER, V27, P677, DOI 10.1016/0005-7967(89)90152-6 Shafran R, 1997, BRIT J CLIN PSYCHOL, V36, P397, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1997.tb01247.x Shapira NA, 2000, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V57, P267, DOI 10.1016/S0165-0327(99)00107-X Smith AR, 2013, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V149, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.032 Steketee G, 2005, BEHAV RES THER, V43, P1527, DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2004.07.010 Steketee G, 2001, BEHAV RES THER, V39, P987 Tabachnick B.G., 2007, USING MULTIVARIATE S, V5, P481 Woods CM, 2004, J PSYCHOPATHOL BEHAV, V26, P113, DOI 10.1023/B:JOBA.0000013659.13416.30 ZWICK WR, 1986, PSYCHOL BULL, V99, P432, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 NR 40 TC 8 Z9 8 PU MASARYKOVA UNIV, FAC SOCIAL STUDIES PI BRNO PA JOSTOVA 10, BRNO, 602 00, CZECH REPUBLIC PY 2015 VL 9 IS 2 AR 6 DI 10.5817/CP2015-2-6 WC Communication; Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Communication; Psychology ER PT J AU Chen, SW Behm-Morawitz, E AF Chen, Szu-Wei Behm-Morawitz, Elizabeth TI Deciphering blog users: young adults' personalities, motivations, and perceived importance of blog features SO INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY LA English DT Article DE Blog readership; motivations; uses and gratifications; personality traits; new media ID INTERNET; MOTIVES; USAGE; GRATIFICATIONS; CREDIBILITY; NEWSPAPERS; WEB; AGE AB The present study examines the cyberpsychology of blog readership as well as the digital content preferences of the Millennial generation by examining the links between college students' personality traits, motivations to read blogs, and preferred blog features. Results indicate that personality influences motivations for reading blogs, which in turn helps predict perceived importance of blog characteristics. Notably, extraversion and neuroticism were related to reading blogs for social interaction; extraversion negatively predicted use of blogs to meet identity needs; openness was related to blog reading for entertainment purposes; and conscientiousness was positively associated with information seeking via blogs. Additionally, motivations for blog readership as explanatory mechanisms for the relationships found between personality traits and perceived importance of blog features are discussed. C1 [Chen, Szu-Wei] I Shou Univ, Dept Digital Media Design, 1,Sec 1,Syuecheng Rd, Kaohsiung 84001, Taiwan. [Behm-Morawitz, Elizabeth] Univ Missouri, Dept Commun, Grad Studies, Columbia, MO USA. C3 I Shou University; University of Missouri System; University of Missouri Columbia RP Chen, SW (corresponding author), I Shou Univ, Dept Digital Media Design, 1,Sec 1,Syuecheng Rd, Kaohsiung 84001, Taiwan. EM swchen@isu.edu.tw; behmmorawitze@missouri.edu CR AJZEN I, 1988, ATTITUDES PERSONALIT Amiel T, 2004, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V20, P711, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.002 ANDERSON JC, 1988, PSYCHOL BULL, V103, P411, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 Cristol H, 2002, FUTURIST, V36, P8 Cutrona CE, 1990, SOCIAL SUPPORT INTER, P319, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1083-6101.2007.00367.X Eastin M.S., 2001, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V6, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1083-6101.2001.TB00126.X Eighmey J, 1998, J BUS RES, V41, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00061-1 Eysenck H.J.E., 1991, MANUAL EYSENCK PERSO, DOI DOI 10.1037/T05461-000 Goby VP, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P5, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.5 Guadagno RE, 2008, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V24, P1993, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2007.09.001 Herring S. C., 2005, Information Technology & People, V18, P142, DOI 10.1108/09593840510601513 Hollenbaugh EE, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P13, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0403 Hsu CL, 2008, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V45, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2007.11.001 Hu LT, 1999, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/10705519909540118 John O.P., 1999, HDB PERSONALITY THEO, V2, P102 John OP., 1991, BIG 5 INVENTORY VERS, DOI [DOI 10.1037/T07550-000, 10.1037/t07550-000] Johnson TJ, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V13, P100, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00388.x Johnson TJ, 2004, JOURNALISM MASS COMM, V81, P622, DOI 10.1177/107769900408100310 Joinson A. N., 1998, PSYCHOL INTERNET INT, P43 Katz E., 1974, USES MASS COMMUNICAT Kaye BK, 2010, ATL J COMMUN, V18, P194, DOI 10.1080/15456870.2010.505904 Kraut R, 2002, J SOC ISSUES, V58, P49, DOI 10.1111/1540-4560.00248 Lucas RE, 2000, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V79, P452, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.452 McQuail D., 1983, MASS COMMUNICATION T MEYER P, 1988, JOURNALISM QUART, V65, P567, DOI 10.1177/107769908806500301 Mirura A., 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V12, P1452, DOI [10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00381.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1083-6101.2007.00381.X] MYERSBRIGGS I, 1998, MBTI MANUAL GUIDE MY Nardi BA, 2004, COMMUN ACM, V47, P41, DOI 10.1145/1035134.1035163 Orchard LJ, 2010, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V28, P155, DOI 10.1177/0894439309335115 *PEW RES CTR, 2010, SOC MED MOB INT US T Pew Research Center, 2010, HAN LAK REP 2010 Qian H, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V12, P1428, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00380.x Ruggiero T. E., 2000, MASS COMMUN SOC, V3, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02, 10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02] Sano Y., 2015, P INT C SOC MOD SIM, V2014, P289 Stefanone MA, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V13, P123, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00389.x Suler J, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P321, DOI 10.1089/1094931041291295 Swickert RJ, 2002, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V18, P437, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00054-1 Trowbridge F., 2016, P HUM FACT ERG SOC A, V60, P413, DOI [10.1177/1541931213601093, DOI 10.1177/1541931213601093] Tuten TL, 2001, SOC BEHAV PERSONAL, V29, P391, DOI 10.2224/sbp.2001.29.4.391 Watkins S. C., 2009, YOUNG DIGITAL WHAT M Wolfradt U, 2001, J EDUC COMPUT RES, V24, P13, DOI 10.2190/ANPM-LN97-AUT2-D2EJ NR 41 TC 4 Z9 4 PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD PI ABINGDON PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND PY 2018 VL 21 IS 10 BP 1493 EP 1505 DI 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1339725 WC Communication; Sociology SC Communication; Sociology ER PT J AU Kubheka, B AF Kubheka, B. TI Ethical and legal perspectives on use of social media by health professionals in South Africa SO SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL LA English DT Article AB Use of social media has increased exponentially throughout the world. Social media provides a platform for building social and professional relationships that can be used by all, including healthcare professionals. Alongside the benefits of creating networks and spreading information wider and faster than is possible with traditional communication channels, however, it presents ethical and legal challenges. For health professionals, it poses a threat to confidentiality and privacy owed to patients, colleagues and employers. It is vital for health professionals to acknowledge that the same ethical and legal standards apply both online and offline, and that they are accountable to professional bodies and the law for their online activities. This article seeks to explore the ethical and legal pitfalls facing health professionals using social media platforms. Importantly, it seeks to create awareness about the cyberpsychology phenomenon called the 'online disinhibition effect', responsible for lowering restraint during online activities. C1 [Kubheka, B.] Hlth IQ Consulting, Johannesburg, South Africa. [Kubheka, B.] Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Johannesburg, South Africa. C3 University of Witwatersrand RP Kubheka, B (corresponding author), Hlth IQ Consulting, Johannesburg, South Africa.; Kubheka, B (corresponding author), Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Johannesburg, South Africa. EM brenda.k@wol.co.za CR Basevi R, 2014, NEW ZEAL J PHYS, P68 Beauchamp TL, 2013, PRINCIPLES MED BIOME Breen G.M., 2010, ETHICS MED, V26, P25 Farnan JM, 2010, AJOB PRIM RES, V1, P3, DOI 10.1080/21507711003697527 Genever S., 2015, NOAKES HOT WATER TWI Grobler C, 2016, S AFR J BIOETH LAW, V9, P22, DOI 10.7196/SAJBL.2016.v9i1.464 Health Professions Council of South Africa, 2008, SEEK INF CONS ETH CO Health Professions Council of South Africa, 2008, CONF PROT PROV INF Health Professions Council of South Africa, 2016, ETH GUID GOOD PRACT Knudson E., 2012, AORN J, V97, P5 Lapidot-Lefler N, 2015, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, V9, DOI 10.5817/CP2015-2-3 McQuoid-Mason D., 2011, A Z MED LAW Roos A, 2014, PER-POTCHEF EL LAW J, V17, P2485 Shange N., 2016, YES YOUR BOSS CAN FI Snyder L, 2011, J CLIN ETHIC, V22, P173 South African Government, 1996, CONST REP S AFR Suler J, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P321, DOI 10.1089/1094931041291295 von Muhlen M, 2012, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, V19, P777, DOI 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000990 NR 18 TC 17 Z9 17 PU SA MEDICAL ASSOC PI PRETORIA PA BLOCK F CASTLE WALK CORPORATE PARK, NOSSOB STREET, ERASMUSKLOOF EXT3, PRETORIA, 0002, SOUTH AFRICA PD MAY PY 2017 VL 107 IS 5 BP 386 EP 389 DI 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i5.12047 WC Medicine, General & Internal SC General & Internal Medicine ER PT J AU Arpaci, I Yalcin, SB Baloglu, M Kesici, S AF Arpaci, Ibrahim Yalcin, Suleyman Barbaros Baloglu, Mustafa Kesici, Sahin TI The moderating effect of gender in the relationship between narcissism and selfie-posting behavior SO PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES LA English DT Article DE Gender differences; Selfie posting; Narcissism ID SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; PERSONALITY; FACEBOOK; MODEL; PREDICTORS; COMMITMENT; PORTRAIT; TWITTER AB This study contributes to the cyberpsychology literature by investigating the moderating effect of gender in the relationship between narcissism and selfie posting behavior. A demographic questionnaire, 13-item selfie-posting scale developed and validated in the present study, and Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI-16) were used to collect data. An EFA was conducted to test the factor structure of scales based on data collected from 179 young adults (age 18-27 years). A CFA was then conducted using data from 269 university students (age 18-32 years) to test construct validity of the scales. A correlation analysis was employed to test the correlations between narcissism and selfie posting behavior. The results indicated that the correlations between attitudes, intentions, behaviors, and narcissism are significant for men, but not for women. The results also indicated gender differences in online behavior with women spending more time on social media and selfie-posting. C1 [Arpaci, Ibrahim] Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, Fac Educ, Tokat, Turkey. [Yalcin, Suleyman Barbaros; Kesici, Sahin] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Sch Educ, Dept Counseling, Konya, Turkey. [Baloglu, Mustafa] Hacettepe Univ, Sch Educ, Ankara, Turkey. C3 Gaziosmanpasa University; Necmettin Erbakan University; Hacettepe University RP Arpaci, I (corresponding author), Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Educ, Tokat, Turkey. EM ibrahim.arpaci@gop.edu.tr; barbarosyalcin@konya.edu.tr; baloglu@hacettepe.edu.tr; sahinkesici@konya.edu.tr CR AJZEN I, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V50, P179, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Ames DR, 2006, J RES PERS, V40, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002 Arpaci I, 2019, INFORM DEV, V35, P96, DOI 10.1177/0266666917730119 Arpaci I, 2018, INTERNET RES, V28, P293, DOI 10.1108/IntR-11-2016-0353 Arpaci I, 2018, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V121, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.034 Atay S., 2009, GAZI U J EC ADM SCI, V11, P181 Bogart LA, 2004, BASIC APPL SOC PSYCH, V26, P35, DOI 10.1207/s15324834basp2601_4 BRADLEE PM, 1992, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V13, P821, DOI 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90056-U BUSS DM, 1991, J PERS, V59, P179, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00773.x Cabrera-Nguyen P., 2010, J SOC SOC WORK RES, V1, P99, DOI [10.5243/jsswr.2010.8, DOI 10.5243/JSSWR.2010.8] Campbell WK, 2007, FRONT SOC PSYCHOL, P115 Campbell WK., 2006, SELF RELATIONSHIPS C, P297 Chou WYS, 2009, J MED INTERNET RES, V11, DOI 10.2196/jmir.1249 Davenport SW, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V32, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.011 Dhir A, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V63, P549, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.053 Errasti J, 2017, PSYCHOL REP, V120, P997, DOI 10.1177/0033294117713496 Farwell L, 1998, J PERS, V66, P65, DOI 10.1111/1467-6494.00003 FORNELL C, 1981, J MARKETING RES, V18, P39, DOI 10.2307/3151312 Foster JD, 2006, J SOC PERS RELAT, V23, P367, DOI 10.1177/0265407506064204 Fox J, 2015, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V76, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.017 Gefen D., 2005, DATA BASE ADV INF SY, V36, P78, DOI DOI 10.1145/1066149.1066156 Gupta S, 2007, INF RESOUR MANAG J, V20, P28, DOI 10.4018/irmj.2007010103 Hair J.F., 2010, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN, DOI DOI 10.9780/135153093 Halpern D, 2016, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V97, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.019 JOHN OP, 1994, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V66, P206, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.206 Kim E, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V62, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.078 Kline RB, 2011, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, V3rd Lee E, 2014, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V69, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.020 Lee JA, 2016, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V19, P347, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2015.0486 Mehdizadeh S, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P357, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0257 Morf CC, 2001, PSYCHOL INQ, V12, P177, DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1 RASKIN R, 1988, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V54, P890, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890 Rosenthal SA, 2006, LEADERSHIP QUART, V17, P617, DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.005 Ryan T, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1658, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004 Sorokowska A, 2016, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V90, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.037 Sorokowski P, 2015, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V85, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.004 Sorokowski P, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V59, P368, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.033 Sung Y, 2016, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V97, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.032 Tannen D, 1994, YOU JUST DONT UNDERS Vazire S, 2008, J RES PERS, V42, P1439, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.007 Weatherall A., 1998, WOMEN LANGUAGE, V21, P1 Weiser EB, 2015, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V86, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.007 NR 42 TC 21 Z9 23 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD NOV 1 PY 2018 VL 134 BP 71 EP 74 DI 10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.006 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT C AU Stanculescu, E AF Stanculescu, Elena BE Frunzeti, T Popescu, V Jugureanu, R Stefan, V Radu, C TI ONLINE SELF - PRESENTATION FROM THE CYBERPSYCHOLOGY PERSPECTIVE SO ANYWHERE, ANYTIME - EDUCATION ON DEMAND, VOL I SE eLearning and Software for Education LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Online self - presentation; detached self - presentation; positive self - regard need; consistency cognitive need self - presentational tactics AB The aim of this paper was to explore a new psychological concept: online self presentation. There are differences between self presentation in offline environments and online settings, because the last one could be revised before making it available in the cyberspace. Topics from social psychology (social identity theory, social cognition,), self presentation and impression management approach, and personality differences (social skills and shyness) are discussed In all settings (online and offline) individuals try to manage the impression made to other people, but in webspace, very little is done spontaneously because of overcontrolled self - presentation. Online self presentation could contain self serving bias due to the positive self regard and cognitive consistency need Tendency to create a very different self image in online settings than real self could represent a compensatory mechanism for low self confidence, social skills, subjective well being, shyness, and social anxiety. C1 [Stanculescu, Elena] Univ Bucharest, Teacher Training Dept, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Bucharest, Romania. C3 University of Bucharest EM elistapsy@yahoo.com CR Backman C. W, 1988, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC, V21, P43 Bern D. J, 1972, PSYCHOL REV, V74, P183 Boncu St, 1996, PSIHOLOGIA SOCIALA A, P137 BREWER MB, 1991, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V17, P475, DOI 10.1177/0146167291175001 Chen NY, 1997, J SOC PSYCHOL, V137, P117, DOI 10.1080/00224549709595419 CODOL JP, 1975, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V5, P457, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.2420050404 Ellison N. B., 2007, J MEDIATED COMMUNICA, V12, P35 Facebook, 2011, STAT Gergen K. J., 1971, THE CONCEPT OF SELF Leary M.R., 1996, SELF PRESENTATION IM LEARY MR, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P34, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34 MARKUS H, 1987, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V38, P299, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.38.1.299 MARKUS H, 1977, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V35, P63, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63 Monteil J.-M., 1991, PSYCHOL FR, V36-1, P55 Park N, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P729, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2009.0003 Pelham BW, 1999, APP SOC RES, P115 ROGERS TB, 1977, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V35, P677, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677 SNYDER M, 1979, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC, V12, P86 Wicklund RA, 1975, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC, V8, P233, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60252-X, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60252-X.] Zarghooni S, 2007, STUDY SELF PRESENTAT, P24 NR 20 TC 1 Z9 1 PU EDITURA UNIVERSITARA PI BUCHAREST PA BD NICOLAE BALCESCU NO 27-33, BUCHAREST, 00000, ROMANIA PY 2011 BP 155 EP 160 WC Education & Educational Research SC Education & Educational Research ER PT J AU Meredith, J AF Meredith, Joanne TI Conversation analysis, cyberpsychology and online interaction SO SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS LA English DT Article ID COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; MICROANALYSIS; ORGANIZATION; EMOTICONS; REPAIR; TALK; TEXT AB In this paper, I explore how conversation analysis (CA) can be used as a method for analysing online interaction. As the number and quantity of online communication platforms have proliferated, there has been a growing interest in social psychology about the impact and effectiveness of online, text-based communication. A number of theories have been used and developed to explain how online communication might impact upon relationships and effective communication. However, this paper argues that in order to explore the differences between online and offline interaction an analysis of online behaviour is needed. CA allows for an in-depth, sequential and discursive analysis of real-life online interactions. It can explore the ways in which the affordances of the interactional platforms are oriented to or made relevant in the interaction. The utility of CA is demonstrated through a number of examples, highlighting how this method can be used to broaden our understanding of how online communication works in practise. C1 [Meredith, Joanne] Univ Wolverhampton, Dept Psychol, Wolverhampton, England. C3 University of Wolverhampton RP Meredith, J (corresponding author), Univ Wolverhampton, Fac Educ Hlth & Wellbeing, Inst Human Sci, Dept Psychol, MC Bldg, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England. EM j.meredith@wlv.ac.uk CR Androutsopoulos J., 2008, POTENTIALS LIMITATIO Antaki C., 1994, EXPLAINING ARGUING S Arminen I, 2016, RES LANG SOC INTERAC, V49, P290, DOI 10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614 Bailey J, 2013, J COMMUN INQ, V37, P91, DOI 10.1177/0196859912473777 Benwell B, 2006, DISCOURSE AND IDENTITY, P1 Clayman S., 2013, HDB CONVERSATION ANA, V1st, P630 Cox J, 2018, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V83, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.014 Culnan M., 1987, HDB ORG COMMUNICATIO, P420 DAFT RL, 1986, MANAGE SCI, V32, P554, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 Derks D, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P99, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9926 Ditchfield H, 2018, THESIS Dresner E, 2010, COMMUN THEOR, V20, P249, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x Edwards D, 2004, HDB LANGUAGE SOCIAL, P257 Ekberg S, 2016, RES LANG SOC INTERAC, V49, P310, DOI 10.1080/08351813.2016.1199085 Ellison N, 2006, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V11 Evans O, 2016, STUD EUR CINE, V13, P1, DOI 10.1080/17411548.2016.1162605 Farrer J, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P407, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2009.0069 Fullwood C, 2015, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, P9 Giles D, 2015, DISCOURSE CONTEXT ME, V7, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002 GOODWIN C, 1990, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V19, P283, DOI 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435 Heritage J, 2005, LEA COMMUN SER, P103 Herring S. C., 2004, DESIGNING VIRTUAL CO, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 Herring S.C., 2015, HDB DISCOURSE ANAL, P127, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118584194.CH6 Holt E, 2010, J PRAGMATICS, V42, P1513, DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.011 Housley W, 2017, QUAL RES, V17, P627, DOI 10.1177/1468794117715063 Huber BT, 2013, MICROPALEAEONTOLOGIC, P71 Hutchby I., 2001, CONVERSATION TECHNOL Jefferson G, 1978, STUDIES ORG CONVERSA, P219, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 Kloess JA, 2017, SEX ABUSE-J RES TR, V29, P563, DOI 10.1177/1079063215612442 Licoppe C, 2018, DISCOURSE STUD, V20, P637, DOI 10.1177/1461445618760606 Licoppe C, 2016, NEW MEDIA SOC, V18, P2540, DOI 10.1177/1461444815589702 Liddicoat A. J., 2011, INTRO CONVERSATION A Markman K.M., 2007, ASS INT RES ANN C, V8 McKenna KYA, 2000, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V4, P57, DOI 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6 Meredith J., 2016, QUAL RES, p(pp. 261 Meredith J, 2017, J PRAGMATICS, V115, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.001 Meredith J, 2014, ADV HUM SOC ASPEC T, P370, DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-4426-7.ch017 Meredith J, 2014, DISCOURSE COMMUN, V8, P181, DOI 10.1177/1750481313510815 Myddleton J., 2015, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, P49 Paulus T, 2016, DISCOURSE CONTEXT ME, V12, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.dcm.2016.04.001 Pomerantz A., 1997, DISCOURSE SOCIAL INT, P64 Postmes T, 2000, HUM COMMUN RES, V26, P341, DOI 10.1093/hcr/26.3.341 Potter J., 2012, APA HDB RES METHODS, V2, P111, DOI DOI 10.1037/13620-008 Potter J, 2020, BRIT J SOC PSYCHOL, V59, P347, DOI 10.1111/bjso.12346 Potter J, 2012, BRIT J SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P436, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02085.x Reed DJ, 2017, J PRAGMATICS, V115, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.012 Schegloff EA, 2000, LANG SOC, V29, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0047404500001019 SCHEGLOFF EA, 1986, HUM STUD, V9, P111, DOI 10.1007/BF00148124 Schegloff EA, 2007, SEQUENCE ORGANIZATION IN INTERACTION: A PRIMER IN CONVERSATION ANALYSIS I, P1, DOI 10.2277/ 0521532795 SCHEGLOFF EA, 1968, AM ANTHROPOL, V70, P1075, DOI 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 Schonfeldt J, 2003, RES LANG SOC INTERAC, V36, P241, DOI 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_02 Short J. A., 1976, SOCIAL PSYCHOL TELEC Sidnell J., 2010, CONVERSATION ANAL IN Speer SA, 2017, RES LANG SOC INTERAC, V50, P128, DOI 10.1080/08351813.2017.1301297 SPROULL L, 1986, MANAGE SCI, V32, P1492, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492 Stokoe E, 2009, TEXT TALK, V29, P75, DOI 10.1515/TEXT.2009.004 Stommel W, 2010, DISCOURSE STUD, V12, P357, DOI 10.1177/1461445609358518 Suler J, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P321, DOI 10.1089/1094931041291295 Tolins J, 2016, RES LANG SOC INTERAC, V49, P75, DOI 10.1080/08351813.2016.1164391 Turkle, 2017, RECLAIMING CONVERSAT Walther J.B., 2011, HDB INTERPERSONAL CO, V4, P443, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00123-5 Walther JB, 1996, COMMUN RES, V23, P3, DOI 10.1177/009365096023001001 WALTHER JB, 1992, COMMUN RES, V19, P52, DOI 10.1177/009365092019001003 Zimmerman Don., 1998, IDENTITIES TALK, P87 NR 64 TC 3 Z9 3 PU WILEY PI HOBOKEN PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA PD MAY PY 2020 VL 14 IS 5 AR e12529 DI 10.1111/spc3.12529 EA APR 2020 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Caponnetto, P Milazzo, M AF Caponnetto, Pasquale Milazzo, Michele TI Cyber Health Psychology: The use of new technologies at the service of psychological well being and health empowerment SO HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH LA English DT Review DE Cyberpsychology; Virtual reality; Avatar therapy; Artificial intelligence; Biofeedback in psychology ID REALITY EXPOSURE THERAPY; VIRTUAL-REALITY; DISORDER; ANXIETY AB Man and technology seem to co-evolve into a process of reciprocal conditioning. On the one hand, the man modifies (and evolves) the technology according to his needs, on the other the technology revolutionates the man and the way in which it lives. Psychology, therefore, as a discipline afferent to the human sciences, is called to take an interest in this relationship and to understand its complexity. A fundamental role in this sense is covered by "cyberpsychology" which investigates all those psychological phenomena that are associated with technology and aims to analyse the processes of change triggered by the interaction between man and the new media. From the psychological point of view, if on the one hand it is important to understand how man changes in contact with the new technologies and to what problems he is meeting. On the other hand, there is a need to understand how new technologies, given their transformative potential, can find a place within the therapeutic practice. In this regard, some of the technologies used in the clinical field have been analysed including: virtual reality, biosensors, artificial intelligence and affective computing. With the aim of understanding to what extent and how technological progress and the emergence of new technologies can contribute and generate value within the psychological panorama. Following the PRISMA statement a bibliographic research was carried out, which provided for consultation of the Medline and PsycINFO databases. The criteria according to which works have been selected rather than others refer to their precision and sensitivity with which they propose to treat technological applications in the field of health psychology and from this the emergence of the new theme "CYBER HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY". The results of the research suggest that the integrated use of psychological techniques and new technologies is extremely productive in terms of potential improvement of health and therefore of "health empowerment". In this vision, new technologies are not intended to replace traditional procedures but to integrate them by making available features and potential that man does not have in nature. Given the great potential of the instruments analyzed that still today continue to evolve and refine it is advisable to know them, validate their effectiveness and adapt our operational models to new realities. C1 [Caponnetto, Pasquale] Univ Catania, Dept Clin & Expt Biomed, I-95123 Catania, CT, Italy. [Milazzo, Michele] Univ Catania, Dept Educ Sci, Catania, Italy. C3 University of Catania; University of Catania RP Caponnetto, P (corresponding author), Univ Catania, Dept Clin & Expt Biomed, I-95123 Catania, CT, Italy. EM pcapon@unict.it CR Anderson PL, 2013, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V81, P751, DOI 10.1037/a0033559 Beilby J, 2018, AUST J GEN PRACT, V47, P522, DOI 10.31128/AJGP-02-18-4489 Biondi M, 2014, RIV PSICHIATR, V49, P217, DOI 10.1708/1668.18262 Botella C, 2015, NEUROPSYCH DIS TREAT, V11, P2533, DOI 10.2147/NDT.S89542 Bouchard S, 2011, EXPERT REV NEUROTHER, V11, P207, DOI 10.1586/ERN.10.196 Kaye LK, 2016, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V19, P294, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2016.29033.lkk Leff J, 2014, PSYCHOSIS, V6, P166, DOI 10.1080/17522439.2013.773457 Mitrousia V, 2016, Psychiatriki, V27, P276, DOI 10.22365/jpsych.2016.274.276 Moher D, 2015, SYST REV-LONDON, V4, DOI [10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.g7647, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1136/bmj.i4086] Morina N, 2015, BEHAV RES THER, V74, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.010 Perez-Ara MA, 2010, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V154, P77, DOI 10.3233/978-1-60750-561-7-77 Riva G., 2018, PSICOLOGIA CONT, P34 Riva G., 2008, PSICOLOGIA NUOVI MED Valtchanov D, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P503, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0308 Villani D., 2011, TECNOLOGIE EMOTIVE N NR 15 TC 8 Z9 8 PU OPEN MEDICAL PUBL LLC PI SCOTTSDALE PA 14624 N 55 ST, SCOTTSDALE, AZ, UNITED STATES PY 2019 VL 7 IS 2 BP 40 EP 47 DI 10.4081/hpr.2019.8559 WC Psychology, Clinical SC Psychology ER PT J AU Villacampa, J Ingram, GPD Marti-Vilar, M Olivera-La Rosa, A AF Villacampa, Javier Ingram, Gordon P. D. Marti-Vilar, Manuel Olivera-La Rosa, Antonio TI An investigation of Facebook users' implicit associations between Facebook, sexual and prosocial behavior SO HELIYON LA English DT Article DE Psychology ID SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES; IAT; METAANALYSIS; PERSONALITY; NARCISSISM; COGNITION; GENDER; ADULTS; MEDIA; AGE AB Despite growing research on online social networking, implicit associations of Facebook users have been largely understudied. In Study 1, we used the Single-Target Implicit Association Test (ST-IAT; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006) in order to assess implicit associations between Facebook and two evolutionary relevant constructs: sexual and prosocial behavior. Additionally, we controlled for the role of participant's relationship status as a potential moderator of Facebook implicit associations. In Study 2, we extended these findings and explored the relationship between implicit and explicit associations towards Facebook. Across two studies, we found that Facebook is more strongly associated with prosocial than with sexual behavior. This effect was not sensitive to sex differences. Further, Study 2 results revealed that implicit and explicit associations did not correlate. We discuss the implications of these findings, underlining the role of implicit measures in cyberpsychology research. C1 [Villacampa, Javier; Olivera-La Rosa, Antonio] Univ Balearic Isl, CSIC, Human Evolut & Cognit Grp, IFISC, Carr Valldemossa 07122, Palma De Mallorca 07122, Spain. [Ingram, Gordon P. D.] Univ Los Andes, Dept Psychol, Cra 1 18a-12, Bogota, Colombia. [Marti-Vilar, Manuel] Univ Valencia, Dept Basic Psychol, Av Blasco Ibanez 13, Valencia 46010, Spain. [Olivera-La Rosa, Antonio] Univ Catolica Luis Amigo, Dept Psychol & Social Sci, Tv 51a 6790, Medellin, Colombia. C3 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC); Universitat de les Illes Balears; CSIC-UIB - Instituto de Fisica Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos (IFISC); Universidad de los Andes (Colombia); University of Valencia RP Olivera-La Rosa, A (corresponding author), Univ Balearic Isl, CSIC, Human Evolut & Cognit Grp, IFISC, Carr Valldemossa 07122, Palma De Mallorca 07122, Spain.; Olivera-La Rosa, A (corresponding author), Univ Catolica Luis Amigo, Dept Psychol & Social Sci, Tv 51a 6790, Medellin, Colombia. EM antonio.oliverade@amigo.edu.co CR Baron-Cohen S, 2004, J AUTISM DEV DISORD, V34, P163, DOI 10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00 Beilin H., 2013, INFANCY Blanton H, 2015, ASSESSMENT, V22, P429, DOI 10.1177/1073191114551382 Bluemke M, 2006, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V42, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.004 Bluemke M, 2008, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V38, P977, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.487 Bohner G, 2008, GROUP PROCESS INTERG, V11, P301, DOI 10.1177/1368430208090644 Brandtzaeg PB, 2017, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V35, P103, DOI 10.1177/0894439315605806 BUSS DM, 1993, PSYCHOL REV, V100, P204, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204 Cameron CD, 2012, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V16, P330, DOI 10.1177/1088868312440047 Chiou WB, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P68, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2013.0035 Cox J, 2018, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V83, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.014 Cross SE, 2000, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V78, P791, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.791 De Houwer J, 2003, EXP PSYCHOL, V50, P77, DOI 10.1026//1618-3169.50.2.77 De Houwer J, 2009, PSYCHOL BULL, V135, P347, DOI 10.1037/a0014211 DEVINE PG, 1989, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V56, P5, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 Doornwaard SM, 2014, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V55, P535, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.04.002 Eagly AH, 2009, AM PSYCHOL, V64, P644, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644 Eisenberg N., 1989, ROOTS PROSOCIAL BEHA Eisenberg N., 1998, HDB CHILD PSYCHOL, P701, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470147658.CHPSY0311 Ferenczi N, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V77, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.033 GAWRONSKI B, 2017, HDB ATTITUDES Greenwald AG, 1998, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V74, P1464, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 Greenwald AG, 2003, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V85, P197, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 Greenwald AG, 2009, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V97, P17, DOI 10.1037/a0015575 Hahn A., 2018, STEVENS HDB EXPT PSY Hawk ST, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V52, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.014 Hendriks CM, 2016, ENVIRON POLIT, V25, P1102, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2016.1196967 Karpinski A, 2006, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V91, P16, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16 Krasnova H, 2017, J STRATEGIC INF SYST, V26, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.jsis.2017.01.004 LeFebvre L. E., 2017, J SOC PERS RELAT Mathot S, 2012, BEHAV RES METHODS, V44, P314, DOI 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7 Mazman S.G., 2011, TOJET TURKISH ONLINE, V10 McAndrew FT, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P2359, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.007 McKenna KYA, 2000, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V4, P57, DOI 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6 Mico JL, 2014, INFORM COMMUN SOC, V17, P858, DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2013.830634 Muscanell NL, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.016 Payne BK., 2010, HDB IMPLICIT SOCIAL, P1 Piazza J, 2009, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V25, P1258, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.002 Piazza JR, 2015, EVOL PSYCHOL-SER, P159, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_13 Raacke J, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P169, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.0056 Steffens MC, 2004, EXP PSYCHOL, V51, P165, DOI 10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.165 Sumter SR, 2017, TELEMAT INFORM, V34, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009 Trivers R. L., 1972, SEXUAL SELECTION DES, P136, DOI DOI 10.1002/AJPA.1330400226 Villacampa J., 2017, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE Weiser DA, 2018, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V133, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.025 Whitty MT, 2008, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V24, P1707, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.002 Xu XM, 2015, MEDICINE, V94, DOI 10.1097/MD.0000000000001236 NR 47 TC 4 Z9 4 PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND PD SEP PY 2018 VL 4 IS 9 AR e00811 DI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00811 WC Multidisciplinary Sciences SC Science & Technology - Other Topics ER PT J AU Vinagre, M AF Vinagre, Margarita TI Politeness strategies in collaborative e-mail exchanges SO COMPUTERS & EDUCATION LA English DT Article DE computer-supported collaborative learning; computer-mediated communication; collaborative learning; interactive learning environments; cross-cultural projects AB Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) has been the subject of a wide range of studies over the last twenty years. Previous research suggests that CSCL exchanges can facilitate group-based learning and knowledge construction among learners who are in different geographical locations (Littleton, K. & Whitelock, D. (2004). Guiding the creation of knowledge and understanding in a virtual learning environment. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour, 7(2), 173). A less known fact, however, is that successful CSCL exchanges depend on the social interaction that takes place among participants. This social interaction is crucial, since it affects both cognitive and socio-emotional processes that take place during learning (Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P., Jochems, W. & Van Buuren, H. (2004). Determining sociability, social space, and social presence in (a) synchronous collaborative groups. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour, 7 (2), 156). Nevertheless, its presence in these exchanges should not be taken for granted, since there are certain barriers which may impede interaction; for example, students may not know each other previously (high social distance) and requests and offers which appear recurrently in collaborative learning messages can threaten the participants' negative face (Brown and Levinson 1978, 1987). In order to explore how participants overcome these barriers, we have analysed the linguistic features of politeness strategies used in the introductory c-mails exchanged between eleven students and their partners, who are students of English and Spanish, respectively. Our findings show that partners in collaborative e-mail exchanges do not use negative politeness strategies as often as we might expect in encounters where the social distance between participants is high, but they rely heavily on positive politeness strategies, especially those relating to 'claiming common ground', 'assuming or asserting reciprocity' and 'conveying cooperation'. The presence of these strategies would indicate that fostering closeness, solidarity and cohesion becomes the priority to be achieved between the partners, instead of the expected negative politeness mechanisms whose aim is to demonstrate high social distance and, therefore, formality and impersonality. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. C1 Antonio Nebrija Univ, Dept Appl Languages, Madrid 28240, Spain. C3 Universidad Antonio de Nebrija RP Vinagre, M (corresponding author), Antonio Nebrija Univ, Dept Appl Languages, La Berzosa Campus,Hoyo De Manzanares, Madrid 28240, Spain. EM mvinagre@nebrija.es CR APPEL MC, 1999, 54 CLSC BARSON J, 1993, J SCI EDUC TECHNOL, V2, P565 BELZ JA, 2002, LANGUAGE LEARNING TE, V6, P60 Brown H. D., 2000, PRINCIPLES LANGUAGE Brown Penelope, 1978, POLITENESS SOME UNIV, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511813085 COOPER MM, 1990, COLL ENGL, V52, P847, DOI 10.2307/377388 CROOK C, 1999, RETHINKING COLLABORA, P194 Cutler R. H., 1996, COMMUNICATION CYBERS, P317 Eelen Gino., 2001, CRITIQUE POLITENESS FREEMAN D, 1992, COLLABORATIVE LANGUA GONGLEWSKY M, 2001, USING EMAIL FOREIGN Gonzalez-Bueno M., 1998, LANGUAGE LEARNING TE, V1, P55 GOODMAN K, 1967, J READING SPECIA MAY, P26 Grice P., 1975, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, V3, P43, DOI DOI 10.1163/9789004368811_003 KOHONEN V, 1992, COLLABORATIVE LANGUA Kreijns K, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P155, DOI 10.1089/109493104323024429 Laister J, 2001, 3 GENERATION LEARNIN LITTLE D, 1999, 55 CLCS Little D, 1991, LEARNER AUTONOMY Littleton K, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P173, DOI 10.1089/109493104323024438 MASON E, 1970, COLLABORATIVFE LEARN MORAND DA, 2003, P 3L HAW INT C SYST MULLERHARTMANN A, 2000, LANGUAGE LEARNING TE, V4, P129 O'Dowd R, 2003, LANG LEARN TECHNOL, V7, P118 Piaget J., 1932, MORAL JUDGEMENT CHIL Piaget Jean, 1928, JUDGEMENT REASONING Van Handle D. C., 1998, CALICO Journal, V15, P129 Vinagre M., 2005, Computer Assisted Language Learning, V18, P369, DOI 10.1080/09588220500442749 VINAGRE M, 2005, ES REV, V26, P241 VYGOTSKY LEV, 1987, THOUGHT LANGUAGE Vygotsky LS., 1978, MIND SOC, DOI [10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4, DOI 10.2307/J.CTVJF9VZ4] Warschauer M., 1995, CALICO J, V13, P7 Watts Richard J, 2003, POLITENESS, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511615184 Woodin J., 1997, ReCALL, V9, P22, DOI 10.1017/S0958344000004596 NR 34 TC 44 Z9 44 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD APR PY 2008 VL 50 IS 3 BP 1022 EP 1036 DI 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.002 WC Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Education & Educational Research SC Computer Science; Education & Educational Research ER PT J AU Arpaci, I Unver, TK AF Arpaci, Ibrahim Kocadag Unver, Tugba TI Moderating Role of Gender in the Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Smartphone Addiction SO PSYCHIATRIC QUARTERLY LA English DT Article DE Big five; Gender differences; Personality; Smartphone addiction ID INTERNET ADDICTION; MEDIATING ROLE; USAGE; ADOLESCENTS; MODEL AB This study contributed to cyberpsychology literature by identifying moderating role of gender in the relationship between personality traits and smartphone addiction. A multi-group SEM analysis was employed to investigate the relationship between five factor personality traits (i.e. Big Five) and smartphone addiction among men and women. Big-Five-Inventory (BFI) and Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI) were used to collect data from 320 undergraduate students. The results suggested a positively significant relationship between neuroticism (emotional imbalance) and smartphone addiction for women only. Whereas, conscientiousness was negatively related with smartphone addiction for women. Further, there was a negatively significant relationship between agreeableness and smartphone addiction for both genders. The findings suggested that gender has a moderating role in the relationship between neuroticism and smartphone addiction. C1 [Arpaci, Ibrahim] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, Distance Educ Applicat & Res Ctr, Tokat, Turkey. [Kocadag Unver, Tugba] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, Tokat, Turkey. C3 Gaziosmanpasa University; Gaziosmanpasa University RP Arpaci, I (corresponding author), Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, Distance Educ Applicat & Res Ctr, Tokat, Turkey. EM ibrahimarpaci@gmail.com; tugba.kocadag@gop.edu.tr CR American Psychiatric Association, 2022, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, V5th ed Arpaci I, 2020, CURR PSYCHOL, V39, P2246, DOI 10.1007/s12144-018-9913-8 Arpaci I, 2019, INFORM DEV, V35, P96, DOI 10.1177/0266666917730119 Arpaci I, 2018, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V134, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.006 Arpaci I, 2017, J MED INTERNET RES, V19, DOI 10.2196/jmir.8847 Arpaci I, 2018, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V121, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.034 BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 Benet-Martinez V, 1998, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V75, P729, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729 Blachnio A, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V68, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.037 Chaplin W., 2007, HDB RES METHODS PERS, P602 Cocorada E, 2018, CHILD YOUTH SERV REV, V93, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.08.006 GRIFFITHS MD, 2017, GLOBAL J ADDICTION R, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.19080/GJARM.2017.03.555610 Hair J. F, 2006, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN Kayis AR, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V63, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.012 Kim YI, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0157299 Kircaburun K, 2018, J BEHAV ADDICT, V7, P158, DOI 10.1556/2006.7.2018.15 Kline R.B., 2016, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE Kuss DJ, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V39, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.031 Lane W., 2011, INT J BUSINESS SOCIA, V2, P22 Lee YK, 2017, INT J MOB COMMUN, V15, P414, DOI 10.1504/IJMC.2017.084863 Lee YK, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V31, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.047 Lian L, 2017, CURR PSYCHOL, V36, P376, DOI 10.1007/s12144-017-9612-x Lin Y, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0098312, 10.1371/journal.pone.0097838] Muller KW, 2018, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V62, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.011 Ozkan, 2005, TRAFFIC TRANSPORT PS, P215, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-008044379-9/50173-4 Panda A, 2018, TELEMAT INFORM, V35, P1355, DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.006 Panova T, 2018, J BEHAV ADDICT, V7, P252, DOI 10.1556/2006.7.2018.49 Pearson C, 2016, ADDICTA, V3, P193, DOI 10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0103 Rahmani S, 2011, PROCD SOC BEHV, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.054 Roberts JA, 2015, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V79, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.049 Seo DG, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V63, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.026 Servidio R, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V35, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.024 Takao Motoharu, 2014, Indian J Community Med, V39, P111, DOI 10.4103/0970-0218.132736] Wang PC, 2021, CURR PSYCHOL, V40, P2910, DOI 10.1007/s12144-019-00232-x Wang PC, 2017, J BEHAV ADDICT, V6, P708, DOI 10.1556/2006.6.2017.079 Zhou YY, 2017, ADDICT BEHAV, V64, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.08.009 NR 36 TC 26 Z9 28 PU SPRINGER PI NEW YORK PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES PD JUN PY 2020 VL 91 IS 2 BP 577 EP 585 DI 10.1007/s11126-020-09718-5 EA FEB 2020 WC Psychiatry SC Psychiatry ER PT J AU Deans, H Bhogal, MS AF Deans, Heather Bhogal, Manpal Singh TI Perpetrating Cyber Dating Abuse: A Brief Report on the Role of Aggression, Romantic Jealousy and Gender SO CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Article DE Cyberpsychology; Cyber dating abuse; Aggression; Romantic jealousy; Electronic communication technology ID SOCIALLY INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY; VIOLENCE; PARTNER; YOUNG; PREVALENCE; ATTACHMENT; VICTIMIZATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; RISK AB There is increasing evidence that the use of electronic communication technology (ECT) is being integrated into romantic relationships, which can be used as a medium to control a romantic partner. Most research focuses on the victims of cyber dating abuse, however, we focused on the factors that predict perpetration of cyber dating abuse. We explored whether aggression (verbal aggression, physical aggression, anger and hostility), romantic jealousy (emotional, cognitive and behavioral jealousy), and gender predicted perpetration of cyber dating abuse (n = 189). We found that hostility, behavioral jealousy and gender significantly predicted perpetration of cyber dating abuse. The findings of this study contribute to our understanding of the psychological factors that drive cyber dating abuse in romantic relationships. C1 [Deans, Heather; Bhogal, Manpal Singh] Coventry Univ, Sch Psychol Social & Behav Sci, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England. [Bhogal, Manpal Singh] Staffordshire Univ, Psychol Dept, Sch Life Sci & Educ, Stoke On Trent ST4 2DE, Staffs, England. C3 Coventry University; Staffordshire University RP Bhogal, MS (corresponding author), Coventry Univ, Sch Psychol Social & Behav Sci, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England.; Bhogal, MS (corresponding author), Staffordshire Univ, Psychol Dept, Sch Life Sci & Educ, Stoke On Trent ST4 2DE, Staffs, England. EM ab6430@coventry.ac.uk CR Ali PA, 2013, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V18, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2013.01.003 Attridge M, 2013, SAGE OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1177/2158244013476054 Barelds DPH, 2006, J HOMOSEXUAL, V51, P183, DOI 10.1300/J082v51n03_09 Bennett DC, 2011, VIOLENCE VICTIMS, V26, P410, DOI 10.1891/0886-6708.26.4.410 Borrajo E, 2015, PSYCHOL REP, V116, P565, DOI 10.2466/21.16.PR0.116k22w4 Borrajo E, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V48, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.063 Brown B.B., 2011, ENCY ADOLESCENCE Burke SC, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1162, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.010 BUSS AH, 1992, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V63, P452, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452 Buss DM, 1997, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V72, P346, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.346 Buunk BP, 1997, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V23, P997, DOI 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00136-0 Capaldi DM, 1997, SOC DEV, V6, P184, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9507.1997.tb00101.x Carson CL, 2000, WESTERN J COMM, V64, P308, DOI 10.1080/10570310009374678 Christofides E, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P341, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0226 Coolican H., 2009, RES METHODS STAT PSY, V5th Correa T, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003 Draucker CB, 2010, J CHILD ADOL PS NURS, V23, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2010.00235.x Dye Melanie Livet, 2003, Violence Vict, V18, P163, DOI 10.1891/vivi.2003.18.2.163 Elphinston RA, 2013, WESTERN J COMM, V77, P293, DOI 10.1080/10570314.2013.770161 Elphinston RA, 2011, AUST J PSYCHOL, V63, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00026.x Follingstad DR, 2007, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V12, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2006.07.004 Foshee VA, 1996, HEALTH EDUC RES, V11, P275, DOI 10.1093/her/11.3.275-a Hokoda Audrey, 2012, J Aggress Maltreat Trauma, V21, P351 Hyde JS, 2005, AM PSYCHOL, V60, P581, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581 Jackson N. A., 2007, ENCY DOMESTIC VIOLEN Keys E, 2018, CURR PSYCHOL, V37, P543, DOI 10.1007/s12144-016-9536-x Lavoie F, 2002, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V30, P375, DOI 10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00347-6 Liebana-Cabanillas F, 2014, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V34, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.12.006 Lucero JL, 2014, AFFILIA, V29, P478, DOI 10.1177/0886109914522627 Marazziti D, 2003, EUR PSYCHIAT, V18, P106, DOI 10.1016/S0924-9338(03)00024-5 Marganski A, 2013, INT CRIM JUSTICE REV, V23, P357, DOI 10.1177/1057567713513797 Melander LA, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P263, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0221 Miller MJ, 2014, J NONVERBAL BEHAV, V38, P451, DOI 10.1007/s10919-014-0196-y Perry DG, 2011, J RES ADOLESCENCE, V21, P61, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00715.x PFEIFFER SM, 1989, J SOC PERS RELAT, V6, P181, DOI 10.1177/026540758900600203 POSTMUS J.L, 2013, SEXUAL VIOLENCE ABUS Rueda HA, 2015, J ADOLESCENT RES, V30, P419, DOI 10.1177/0743558414565236 Sesar K, 2014, PSYCHOL BEHAV SCI, V3, P233 Shackelford TK, 2001, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V30, P371, DOI 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00023-4 Stonard KE, 2017, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE, V32, P2083, DOI 10.1177/0886260515590787 Stonard KE, 2014, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V19, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.005 Strawhun J, 2013, VIOLENCE VICTIMS, V28, P715, DOI 10.1891/0886-6708.11-00145 Taylor AC, 2013, J ADULT DEV, V20, P173, DOI 10.1007/s10804-013-9169-3 Teten AL, 2009, J WOMENS HEALTH, V18, P923, DOI 10.1089/jwh.2009.1515 Vagi KJ, 2013, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V42, P633, DOI 10.1007/s10964-013-9907-7 Wolford-Clevenger C, 2016, PSYCHOL VIOLENCE, V6, P156, DOI 10.1037/a0039442 Yahner J, 2015, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE, V30, P1079, DOI 10.1177/0886260514540324 Zweig JM, 2014, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V43, P1306, DOI 10.1007/s10964-013-0047-x NR 48 TC 38 Z9 45 PU SPRINGER PI NEW YORK PA 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA PD OCT PY 2019 VL 38 IS 5 BP 1077 EP 1082 DI 10.1007/s12144-017-9715-4 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Ormsby, H Owen, AL Bhogal, MS AF Ormsby, Hollie Owen, Alison Leah Bhogal, Manpal Singh TI A brief report on the associations amongst social media use, gender, and body esteem in a UK student sample SO CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Article DE Body esteem; Social media use; Cyberpsychology; Health psychology; Social media ID FACEBOOK FRIENDS; SELF-ESTEEM; IMAGE; DISSATISFACTION; BENEFITS; HEALTH; SITES AB Research into the effects of social media on personal wellbeing have been controversial in recent years, with research highlighting links between social media use and body esteem. This conceptual replication study aimed to explore relationships amongst social media use, body esteem, and gender amongst UK university students (n=100). Participants completed measures of social media use and body esteem. It was hypothesized that social media intensity and usage would negatively predict body esteem, with high social media intensity relating to lower body esteem. We find that gender was the only significant predictor of body esteem, with women having lower body esteem compared to men. We were unable to replicate previous findings, as our findings show no relationships amongst social media intensity, use, and body esteem. C1 [Ormsby, Hollie; Owen, Alison Leah] Staffordshire Univ, Sch Life Sci & Educ, Dept Psychol, Staffordshire Ctr Psychol Res, Stoke On Trent ST4 2DE, Staffs, England. [Bhogal, Manpal Singh] Univ Wolverhampton, Inst Human Sci, Dept Psychol, Fac Educ Hlth & Wellbeing,Ctr Psychol Res, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England. C3 Staffordshire University; University of Wolverhampton RP Owen, AL (corresponding author), Staffordshire Univ, Sch Life Sci & Educ, Dept Psychol, Staffordshire Ctr Psychol Res, Stoke On Trent ST4 2DE, Staffs, England. EM alison.owen@staffs.ac.uk CR Bair CE, 2012, EAT BEHAV, V13, P398, DOI 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.06.003 Bhogal MS, 2019, PSYCHOL REP, V122, P550, DOI 10.1177/0033294118764640 Boyd DM, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V13, P210, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x Bucchianeri MM, 2013, BODY IMAGE, V10, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.09.001 Chadee, 2011, THEORIES SOCIAL PSYC, P119, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199730858.013.0010 Cohen R, 2015, J EAT DISORD, V3, DOI 10.1186/s40337-015-0061-3 Cordes M, 2016, PSYCHOL MEN MASCULIN, V17, P243, DOI 10.1037/men0000029 EARP BD, 2015, FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOL, V6 El Ansari W, 2014, CENT EUR J PUBL HEAL, V22, P106, DOI 10.21101/cejph.a3944 Ellison NB, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V12, P1143, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x Faul F, 2009, BEHAV RES METHODS, V41, P1149, DOI 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 Ferguson C.J, 2018, ARCH SCI PSYCHOL, V6, P70, DOI [10.1037/arc0000044, DOI 10.1037/ARC0000044] Ferguson CJ, 2014, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V43, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10964-013-9986-5 Furnham A, 2002, J PSYCHOL, V136, P581, DOI 10.1080/00223980209604820 Grogan S., 2008, BODY IMAGE UNDERSTAN Grogan S, 2006, J HEALTH PSYCHOL, V11, P523, DOI 10.1177/1359105306065013 Heider N, 2015, FRONT PSYCHOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01402 Holland G, 2016, BODY IMAGE, V17, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.008 Johansson L, 2005, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V38, P723, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.026 Lin KY, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1152, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009 Mendelson BK, 2001, J PERS ASSESS, V76, P90, DOI 10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_6 Myers TA, 2009, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V118, P683, DOI 10.1037/a0016763 Nabi RL, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P721, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0521 Owen AL, 2018, BRIT J SCH NURSING, V13, P282 Paxton SJ, 2006, J CLIN CHILD ADOLESC, V35, P539, DOI 10.1207/s15374424jccp3504_5 Pempek TA, 2009, J APPL DEV PSYCHOL, V30, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010 Pepin Genevieve., 2015, J EAT DISORDER, V3, pO22, DOI [10.1186/2050-2974-3-S1-O22, DOI 10.1186/2050-2974-3-S1-O22] Szabo M. K., 2015, EUROPEAN PSYCHIAT, V30, P1354, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0924-9338(15)32029-0 Thompson J. K., 2007, MUSCULAR IDEAL PSYCH Veldhuis J, 2012, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V50, P600, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.10.249 Voelker DK, 2015, ADOLESC HEALTH MED T, V6, P149, DOI 10.2147/AHMT.S68344 Whyte C, 2016, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V35, P822, DOI 10.1521/jscp.2016.35.10.822 NR 32 TC 8 Z9 8 PU SPRINGER PI NEW YORK PA 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA PD APR PY 2019 VL 38 IS 2 BP 303 EP 307 DI 10.1007/s12144-018-0089-z WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT C AU Banos, R Botella, C Quero, S Garcia-Palacios, A Alcaniz, M AF Banos, R. Botella, C. Quero, S. Garcia-Palacios, A. Alcaniz, M. BE Westwood, JD Westwood, SW FellanderTsai, L Haluck, RS Hoffman, HM Robb, RA Senger, S Vosburgh, KG TI Engaging Media for Mental Health Applications: the EMMA Project SO MEDICINE MEETS VIRTUAL REALITY 18 SE Studies in Health Technology and Informatics LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Emotions; Virtual Reality; Presence; Computer Aided Psychotherapy; Psychological Treatments; Stress-related Disorders; Cyberpsychology ID ADAPTIVE DISPLAY; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS; THERAPY; PTSD AB EMMA project has been focused on how the sense of presence in virtual environments mediates or generates emotional responses, and how to use presence and emotional responses in virtual environments effectively in clinical and non clinical settings. EMMA project has developed two different virtual environments. The first one acts as a 'mood device' and is aimed to induce and enhance several moods on clinical and non clinical subjects. The second one is a virtual environment that acts as an adaptive display to treat emotional disorders (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Adjustment Disorder and Pathological Grief). This virtual world varies the contents that are presented depending on the emotions of the patient at each moment. The goal of this paper is to outline the main goals achieved by this project C1 [Banos, R.] Univ Valencia, E-46003 Valencia, Spain. [Botella, C.; Quero, S.; Garcia-Palacios, A.] Univ Jaume 1, Castellon De La Plana, Spain. [Alcaniz, M.] Univ Politecn Valencia, E-46022 Valencia, Spain. [Banos, R.; Botella, C.; Quero, S.; Garcia-Palacios, A.; Alcaniz, M.] CIBER Fisiopatol Obesidad & Nutr CIBEROBN, Madrid, Spain. C3 University of Valencia; Universitat Jaume I; Universitat Politecnica de Valencia; CIBER - Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red; CIBEROBN RP Banos, R (corresponding author), Fac Psicol, Dept Personalidad Evaluac & Tratamientos Psicol, Avda Blasco Ibanez 21, Valencia 46010, Spain. CR Alcaniz M, 2007, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V4565, P258 Banos RM, 2009, BRIT J GUID COUNS, V37, P347, DOI 10.1080/03069880902957064 Banos R. M., P 2009 2 C HUM SYST, P517 Banos RM, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P734, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.734 Banos RM, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P1, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9936 Becker CB, 2004, BEHAV RES THER, V42, P277, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00138-4 Bnos R. M., 2008, APUNTES PSICOLOGIA, V26, P303 Botella C, 2008, DEATH STUD, V32, P674, DOI 10.1080/07481180802231319 Botella C., 2006, CHI 2006 Botella C., 2006, NATO SECURITY SCI SE, V6 BOTELLA C, 2004, CYBERTHERAPY Botella C, 2006, PSYCHNOLOGY J, V4, P129 Botella C, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P67, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0353 Foa EB, 2000, PRACTICE GUIDELINES Hendrix C, 1996, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V5, P274, DOI 10.1162/pres.1996.5.3.274 Ijsselsteijn W, 2001, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V10, P298, DOI 10.1162/105474601300343621 Ijsselsteijn W. A., 2006, PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOG Lang P., 1995, INT AFFECTIVE PICTUR Rey B, 2005, PSYCHNOLOGY J, V3, P101 VELTEN E, 1968, BEHAV RES THER, V6, P473, DOI 10.1016/0005-7967(68)90028-4 WIEDERHOLD BK, 1998, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V1, P45, DOI DOI 10.1089/CPB.1998.1.45 Zimand E, 2003, CLIN PSYCHOL-UK, V56, P5 NR 22 TC 3 Z9 3 PU IOS PRESS PI AMSTERDAM PA NIEUWE HEMWEG 6B, 1013 BG AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS PY 2011 VL 163 BP 44 EP 50 DI 10.3233/978-1-60750-706-2-44 WC Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Health Care Sciences & Services; Medical Informatics SC Computer Science; Health Care Sciences & Services; Medical Informatics ER PT J AU Begishev, IR AF Begishev, Ildar R. TI Cyber-Security Culture: Psychological and Legal Aspects SO PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW LA Russian DT Article DE cyber-security; informational and psychological security; cyberpsychology; culture; social engineering; threat; digital expansion; human factor ID POINT-OF-VIEW; INFORMATION SECURITY; SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS; CHILDREN; ADOLESCENTS AB Digitalization has become part and parcel of the modern-day human activities. Nowadays it is going into every field of business and personal life. To develop and prosper, most organizations need IT systems, and hence to take the safeguarding of their informational assets seriously. Many of the processes which are essential for securing their IT assets, largely depend on human interaction. This study has attempted to address the culture of cyber-security in the light of psychology and law. The results of the research showed that from the psychological standpoint, the culture of cyber-security involves the willingness on the part of a modern human to overcome the digital expansion by mastering the tools for countering the negative IT factors. In its turn, from the legal standpoint, the culture of cyber-security is based on the legislative framework which regulates the legal relations in the field of cyber-security. C1 [Begishev, Ildar R.] Kazan Innovat Univ, Kazan, Russia. C3 Kazan Innovative University named after VG Timiryasov RP Begishev, IR (corresponding author), Kazan Innovat Univ, Kazan, Russia. EM begishev@mail.ru CR Ahmad Z, 2019, INF COMPUT SECUR, V27, P165, DOI 10.1108/ICS-10-2017-0073 Algarni M, 2019, ADV INTELL SYST, V778, P163, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-94391-6_16 AlHogail A., 2014, 2014 WORLD C COMP AP, P1 Beena A.L., 2019, INT C REC ADV EN COM, P1, DOI [10.1109/ICRAECC43874.2019.8995088, DOI 10.1109/ICRAECC43874.2019.8995088] Begishev I.R, 2018, JURIDICHESKAJA PSIHO, V2, P27 Begishev I.R., 2020, PRESTUPLENIJA SFERE Begishev I.R., 2020, VSEROSSIJSKIJ KRIMIN, V14, P96, DOI 10.17150/2500-4255.2020.14(1) Bovina IB, 2017, PSYCHOL LAW, V7, P138, DOI 10.17759/psylaw.2017070311 [Бовина И.Б. Bovina I.B.], 2016, [Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика, Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika], P77 Bovina IB, 2017, PSYCHOL LAW, V7, P19, DOI 10.17759/psylaw.2017060202 Bovina IB, 2017, PSYCHOL LAW, V7, P1, DOI 10.17759/psylaw.2017070101 Bovina IB, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V146, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.092 Budykin SV, 2016, PSYCHOL LAW, V6, P25, DOI 10.17759/psylaw.2016060104 Budykin SV, 2017, PSYCHOL LAW, V7, P13, DOI 10.17759/psylaw.2017070102 Budykin S.V., 2016, PSIHOLOGICHESKAJA NA, V8, P117, DOI 10.17759/psyedu.2016080412 Corradini I, 2020, ADV INTELL SYST, V960, P59, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-20488-4_6 Corradini I, 2019, ADV INTELL SYST, V782, P193, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-94782-2_19 da Veiga A, 2020, COMPUT SECUR, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101713 Da Veiga A, 2015, COMPUT LAW SECUR REV, V31, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2015.01.005 Dvoryanchikov N.V., 2016, JURIDICHESKAJA PSIHO, P31 Glaspie HW, 2018, ADV INTELL SYST, V593, P269, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-60585-2_25 Halevi T., 2016, P 18 INT C INFORM IN, P318, DOI DOI 10.1145/3011141 Kennedy SE, 2016, INF COMPUT SECUR, V24, P255, DOI 10.1108/ICS-10-2014-0065 Kulemina A.E., 2009, INFORM TECHNOLOGY, V6 Kuznetsova Yu.M., 2008, PSIHOLOGIJA ZHITELEJ Manzi D.S., 2020, AKTUALNYE PROBLEMY J, V14, P141, DOI [10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020, DOI 10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020] Martins A, 2002, INT FED INFO PROC, V86, P203 McCormac A, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V69, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.065 Nasir A, 2019, J INF SECUR APPL, V44, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.jisa.2018.11.003 Okere I, 2012, 2012 INFORMATION SECURITY FOR SOUTH AFRICA (ISSA) Parsons KM, 2015, J COGN ENG DECIS MAK, V9, P117, DOI 10.1177/1555343415575152 Ramachandran S., 2008, P ANN HAW INT C SYST, P454, DOI [10.1109/HICSS.2008.201, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2008.201] Schlienger T, 2002, INT FED INFO PROC, V86, P191 Shpagina E.M., 2016, PSIKHOLOGIIA PRAVO, V6, P86, DOI [10.17759/psylaw.2016060409, DOI 10.17759/PSYLAW.2016060409] Tang MC, 2016, INFORM TECHNOL MANAG, V17, P179, DOI 10.1007/s10799-015-0252-2 Thomson K., 2012, Information Management & Computer Security, V20, P39, DOI 10.1108/09685221211219191 Van Niekerk JF, 2010, COMPUT SECUR, V29, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2009.10.005 Wiley A, 2020, COMPUT SECUR, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2019.101640 Zhumagaliyeva B, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V140, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.379 NR 39 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MOSCOW STATE PSYCHOLOGICAL & PEDAGOGICAL UNIV PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, DOM 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2021 VL 11 IS 4 BP 207 EP 220 DI 10.17759/psylaw.2021110415 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Fernandez, KC Levinson, CA Rodebaugh, TL AF Fernandez, Katya C. Levinson, Cheri A. Rodebaugh, Thomas L. TI Profiling: Predicting Social Anxiety From Facebook Profiles SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE LA English DT Article DE internet/cyberpsychology; assessment; anxiety; social identity; psychopathology; social anxiety AB Research on Facebook has suggested that individuals' profiles are an accurate portrayal of the self and that it may be possible to identify traits such as narcissism and extraversion by viewing a Facebook profile. It has been suggested, however, that largely internal experiences, such as anxiety, should be less detectable in such contexts. In the current study, the authors tested if objective criteria (e. g., number of interests) on users' profiles (N = 62) could discriminate between individuals who were higher and lower in social anxiety. The authors asked six coders to view each participant's Facebook profile and rate the participant's level of social anxiety and then tested whether these ratings correlated with the participant's own self-reported social anxiety level. Our results suggest that social anxiety is recognizable both in objective criteria on the Facebook profile page and from raters' impressions of the Facebook profile. Clinical and research implications are discussed. C1 [Fernandez, Katya C.; Levinson, Cheri A.; Rodebaugh, Thomas L.] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA. C3 Washington University (WUSTL) RP Fernandez, KC (corresponding author), Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA. EM Fernandez@wustl.edu; Cherialevinson@wustl.edu CR Back MD, 2010, PSYCHOL SCI, V21, P372, DOI 10.1177/0956797609360756 Baker SR, 2002, BRIT J CLIN PSYCHOL, V41, P243, DOI 10.1348/014466502760379118 Beck A. T., 1996, MANUAL BECK DEPRESSI, DOI DOI 10.1037/T00742-000 Buffardi LE, 2008, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V34, P1303, DOI 10.1177/0146167208320061 Campbell AJ, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P69, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.69 Caplan SE, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P234, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9963 Chavira DA, 2002, J ANXIETY DISORD, V16, P585, DOI 10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00124-X Desjarlais M, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P896, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.004 Donnellan MB, 2006, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V18, P192, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192 Erwin BA, 2004, J ANXIETY DISORD, V18, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2003.08.002 Facebook, 2011, STATISTICS Goldberg L. R., 1999, PERSONALITY PSYCHOL, V7, P7, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JRP.2014.05.003 Gonzales AL, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P79, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0411 HEIMBERG RG, 2002, COGNITIVE BEHAV GROU, P107 Hitwise, 2011, TOP 10 WEBS Kalpidou M, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P183, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0061 Kessler RC, 2005, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V62, P593, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 Levinson C.A., 2012, FACEBOOK INTERNET US Mattick RP, 1998, BEHAV RES THER, V36, P455, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6 Orr ES, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P337, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0214 Peter J, 2006, EUR J COMMUN, V21, P213, DOI 10.1177/0267323105064046 Pierce T, 2009, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V25, P1367, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.06.003 Rapee R. M., 1992, ABNORMAL PSYCHOL, V10, P728 Rentfrow PJ, 2003, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V84, P1236, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1236 Rodebaugh TL, 2011, J ANXIETY DISORD, V25, P623, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.02.002 Rodebaugh TL, 2009, J ANXIETY DISORD, V23, P872, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.05.001 SCHLENKER BR, 1982, PSYCHOL BULL, V92, P641, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.641 Sheldon P., 2008, J MEDIA PSYCHOL, V20, P67, DOI DOI 10.1027/1864-1105.20.2.67 Shepherd RM, 2005, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V39, P949, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.001 Vazire S, 2010, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V98, P281, DOI 10.1037/a0017908 World Internet Usage Statistics, 2011, WORLD INT US POP STA NR 31 TC 46 Z9 46 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC PI THOUSAND OAKS PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA PD NOV PY 2012 VL 3 IS 6 BP 706 EP 713 DI 10.1177/1948550611434967 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Saslow, LR Muise, A Impett, EA Dubin, M AF Saslow, Laura R. Muise, Amy Impett, Emily A. Dubin, Matt TI Can You See How Happy We Are? Facebook Images and Relationship Satisfaction SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE LA English DT Article DE romantic relationships; emotion; Internet/cyberpsychology; well-being; self-presentation ID SOCIAL NETWORKING; SMILE INTENSITY; SELF; PERSONALITY; COMMITMENT; QUALITY; SCALE; RELIABILITY; PROFILES; BEHAVIOR AB Love is often thought to involve a merging of identities or a sense that a romantic partner is part of oneself. Couples who report feeling more satisfied with their relationships also feel more interconnected. We hypothesized that Facebook profile photos would provide a novel way to tap into romantic partners' merged identities. In a cross-sectional study (Study 1), a longitudinal study (Study 2), and a 14-day daily experience study (Study 3), we found that individuals who posted dyadic profile pictures on Facebook reported feeling more satisfied with their relationships and closer to their partners than individuals who did not. We also found that on days when people felt more satisfied in their relationship, they were more likely to share relationship-relevant information on Facebook. This study expands our knowledge of how online behavioral traces give us powerful insight into the satisfaction and closeness of important social bonds. C1 [Saslow, Laura R.] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA. [Muise, Amy; Impett, Emily A.] Univ Toronto, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada. [Dubin, Matt] Claremont Grad Univ, Claremont, CA USA. C3 University of California System; University of California San Francisco; University of Toronto; University Toronto Mississauga; Claremont Colleges; Claremont Graduate School RP Saslow, LR (corresponding author), Univ Calif San Francisco, Osher Ctr, 1545 Divisadero St, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA. EM saslowL@ocim.ucsf.edu CR Agnew CR, 1998, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V74, P939, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939 ARON A, 1992, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V63, P596, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 Aron Arthur, 1991, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V60, P241, DOI DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241 Aron EN, 1996, PERS RELATIONSHIP, V3, P45, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00103.x Back MD, 2010, PSYCHOL SCI, V21, P372, DOI 10.1177/0956797609360756 Buffardi LE, 2008, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V34, P1303, DOI 10.1177/0146167208320061 Buhrmester M, 2011, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V6, P3, DOI 10.1177/1745691610393980 DIENER E, 1985, J PERS ASSESS, V49, P71, DOI 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 Ellison Nicole, 2007, J COMPUTER MEDIATED, V12 Facebook, 2012, PRESS ROOM STAT Fletcher GJO, 2000, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V26, P340, DOI 10.1177/0146167200265007 Forest AL, 2012, PSYCHOL SCI, V23, P295, DOI 10.1177/0956797611429709 Gable SL, 2008, PSYCHOL SCI, V19, P1030, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02195.x Gosling S. D., 2008, SNOOP WHAT YOUR STUF Gosling SD, 2003, J RES PERS, V37, P504, DOI 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1 Harker LA, 2001, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V80, P112, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.80.1.112 HAZAN C, 1987, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V52, P511, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 Hertenstein MJ, 2009, MOTIV EMOTION, V33, P99, DOI 10.1007/s11031-009-9124-6 Lyubomirsky S, 1999, SOC INDIC RES, V46, P137, DOI 10.1023/A:1006824100041 Marshall TC, 2013, PERS RELATIONSHIP, V20, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01393.x Muise A, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P441, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0263 Oveis C, 2009, EMOTION, V9, P544, DOI 10.1037/a0016300 Papp LM, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P85, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2011.0291 RAUDENBUSH SW, 2004, HLM 6 LINEAR NONLINE Reis H. T., 2010, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL, V1, P82, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470561119.SOCPSY001003 Rusbult CE, 1998, PERS RELATIONSHIP, V5, P357, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x Salimkhan G., 2010, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, V4, particl Seder JP, 2012, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V3, P407, DOI 10.1177/1948550611424968 Seider BH, 2009, PSYCHOL AGING, V24, P604, DOI 10.1037/a0016950 Siibak A., 2009, J PSYCHOSOCIAL RES C, V3 Strano M. M., 2008, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, V2, P1 Thibaut J.W., 1978, INTERPERSONAL RELATI Thibaut JW, 1959, SOCIAL PSYCHOL GROUP Utz S, 2011, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V16, P511, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01552.x Wei MF, 2007, J PERS ASSESS, V88, P187, DOI 10.1080/00223890701268041 Weisbuch M, 2009, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V45, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.009 Wieselquist J, 1999, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V77, P942, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.942 Wilson RE, 2012, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V7, P203, DOI 10.1177/1745691612442904 Young K, 2008, AOIR 0 9 C COP DENM ZEGER SL, 1986, BIOMETRICS, V42, P121, DOI 10.2307/2531248 NR 40 TC 67 Z9 69 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC PI THOUSAND OAKS PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA PD JUL PY 2013 VL 4 IS 4 BP 411 EP 418 DI 10.1177/1948550612460059 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Ning, HS Dhelim, S Bouras, MA Khelloufi, A Ullah, A AF Ning, Huansheng Dhelim, Sahraoui Bouras, Mohammed Amine Khelloufi, Amar Ullah, Ata TI Cyber-Syndrome and Its Formation, Classification, Recovery and Prevention SO IEEE ACCESS LA English DT Article DE Cyber-syndrome; cyberpsychology; cyber-physical systems; cyberbullying; Internet addiction; gaming addiction; cyberspace; cyber-enabled spaces ID INTERNET ADDICTION; PEOPLE; TECHNOLOGY; PREVALENCE; SYMPTOMS; THINGS; BRAIN; LIFE AB The revolutionary change in information and communication technology has made the people's lives much convenient more than ever before. But it has affected the human's physical and mental health as well as community's social connectivity. Cybersyndrome is the physical, social, and mental disorders that affect the human being due to the excessive interaction with the cyberspace. Many previous works have discussed the role that the technology plays in the development of specific disorders, such as Internet addiction disorder or gaming addiction disorder. However, none of these works have explored the effects of excessive interaction with the cyberspace on the people's lives as a whole and its impact on the social connectivity of the community. Therefore, in this paper, we have presented the formation stages, classification, recovery, and prevention methods of cybersyndrome. We have explored the impact of cybersyndrome in physical, social, and thinking spaces and its future implications and complications. C1 [Ning, Huansheng; Dhelim, Sahraoui; Bouras, Mohammed Amine; Khelloufi, Amar; Ullah, Ata] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Comp & Commun Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China. [Ning, Huansheng] Beijing Engn Res Ctr Cyberspace Data Anal & Appli, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China. C3 University of Science & Technology Beijing RP Ning, HS (corresponding author), Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Comp & Commun Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.; Ning, HS (corresponding author), Beijing Engn Res Ctr Cyberspace Data Anal & Appli, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China. EM ninghuansheng@ustb.edu.cn FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [61471035]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-BD-18-016A] FX This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61471035 and in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant FRF-BD-18-016A. CR Akdag MZ, 2016, J CHEM NEUROANAT, V75, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.01.003 Al-Ghamdi AK, 2011, AFR J MICROBIOL RES, V5, P3998 Andreassen C.S., 2015, CURR ADDICT REP, V2, P175, DOI [10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9, DOI 10.1007/S40429-015-0056-9] [Anonymous], 2004, INT STAT CLASS DIS R, V1 Balakrishnan J, 2018, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V16, P722, DOI 10.1007/s11469-017-9844-x Beard KW, 2001, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V4, P377, DOI 10.1089/109493101300210286 Calamaro CJ, 2009, PEDIATRICS, V123, pE1005, DOI 10.1542/peds.2008-3641 Cambridge Dictionary, 2018, MEAN SYNDR ENGL DICT Cardis E, 2008, PHYS MED BIOL, V53, P2771, DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/53/11/001 Chen YJ, 2015, ACM COMPUT SURV, V48, DOI 10.1145/2790077 Cheng C, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P755, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2014.0317 Cicchetti D., 1990, CHILDREN SYNDROME DE Coe T., 2015, IS ORIGIN CYBER Deb A, 2015, ASIA-PAC PSYCHIAT, V7, P231, DOI 10.1111/appy.12164 Delmastro F, 2016, IEEE COMMUN MAG, V54, P122, DOI 10.1109/MCOM.2016.7509389 Drouin M, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P1490, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.013 Elgan M., COMPUTER WORLD Elhefnawy N., 2015, CYBERPUNK STEAMPUNK Feng S, 2017, IEEE COMMUN MAG, V55, P34, DOI 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600682CM Foster KR, 2014, BIOMED ENG ONLINE, V13, DOI 10.1186/1475-925X-13-94 Gainsbury Sally M, 2015, Curr Addict Rep, V2, P185 Gandhi OP, 2012, ELECTROMAGN BIOL MED, V31, P34, DOI 10.3109/15368378.2011.622827 Green Bart N, 2008, J Can Chiropr Assoc, V52, P161 Hardell Lennart, 2013, Pathophysiology, V20, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.pathophys.2012.11.001 Hinduja S, 2010, ARCH SUICIDE RES, V14, P206, DOI 10.1080/13811118.2010.494133 Hines R., 2015, FORBES Hu PF, 2017, J NETW COMPUT APPL, V98, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.jnca.2017.09.002 Kaptsis D, 2016, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V43, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.11.006 Kaur S, 2016, INDIAN J HLTH WELLBE, V7, P1149 Ko C. H., 2014, CURR ADDICT REP, V1, P177, DOI DOI 10.1007/S40429-014-0030-Y Koljalg Siiri, 2017, Germs, V7, P73, DOI 10.18683/germs.2017.1111 Litjens G, 2017, MED IMAGE ANAL, V42, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 Matthews S. E., WHY YOUR CELLPHONE H Menon D., 2015, DIS DISORDER CONDITI Miranda J, 2015, IEEE INTERNET COMPUT, V19, P40, DOI 10.1109/MIC.2015.24 Mowatt L, 2018, INT J CLIN PRACT, V72, DOI 10.1111/ijcp.13035 Neupane S., 2017, IJIR, V3, P141 Newitz A., 2013, BIZARRE EVOLUTION WO Noble J., 2018, STUDY SOCIAL MEDIA M Pierce T, 2009, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V25, P1367, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.06.003 Porter C., 2012, WALL STREET J Reuter M., 2015, INTERNET ADDICTION N, P3, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-07242-5_1 Rosen LD, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P2501, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006 Rossow, 2018, FORBES Santos Veruska Andrea, 2016, JMIR Res Protoc, V5, pe46, DOI 10.2196/resprot.5278 Siddiqi S, 2016, INT CONF FRONT INFO, P63, DOI [10.1109/FIT.2016.18, 10.1109/FIT.2016.020] Statista, 2016, NUM MOB PHON US WORL Thiyagarajan S., 2015, INDIAN J MED HEAL SC, V2, P119, DOI [10.21088/ijmhs.2347.9981.2215.11, DOI 10.21088/IJMHS.2347.9981.2215.11] Thomee S, 2011, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-66 Van den Bulck J, 2004, SLEEP, V27, P101, DOI 10.1093/sleep/27.1.101 Volkow ND, 2011, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V305, P808, DOI 10.1001/jama.2011.186 Vondrackova P, 2016, J BEHAV ADDICT, V5, P568, DOI 10.1556/2006.5.2016.085 WIENER N, 1948, Sci Am, V179, P14 Woburn M., 2017, KASPERSKY LAB STUDY Xue QL, 2011, CLIN GERIATR MED, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cger.2010.08.009 Yen CF, 2009, J ADOLESCENCE, V32, P863, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.006 Young KS, 2008, AM BEHAV SCI, V52, P21, DOI 10.1177/0002764208321339 Young KS, 2011, J COGN PSYCHOTHER, V25, P304, DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.25.4.304 Young KS, 2004, AM BEHAV SCI, V48, P402, DOI 10.1177/0002764204270278 Youssef AA, 2018, IEEE ACCESS, V6, P13200, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2810293 Zhang ZY, 2012, IEEE MULTIMEDIA, V19, P4, DOI 10.1109/MMUL.2012.24 Zheng YM, 2016, IEEE ACCESS, V4, P5135, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2602301 NR 62 TC 10 Z9 10 PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC PI PISCATAWAY PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA PY 2018 VL 6 BP 35501 EP 35511 DI 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848286 WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Engineering, Electrical & Electronic; Telecommunications SC Computer Science; Engineering; Telecommunications ER PT J AU Denissen, JJA Neumann, L van Zalk, M AF Denissen, Jaap J. A. Neumann, Linus van Zalk, Maarten TI How the internet is changing the implementation of traditional research methods, people's daily lives, and the way in which developmental scientists conduct research SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT LA English DT Article DE child disclosure; science; social adjustment ID ADOLESCENTS IDENTITY EXPERIMENTS; SELF-DISCLOSURE; OLDER-ADULTS; LIFE-SPAN; PERSONALITY; CONSEQUENCES; PREFERENCES; ADDICTION; PARADOX; SUPPORT AB Recent years have seen an impressive increase in web-based research, of which we review and discuss two main types. First, researchers can create online versions of traditional questionnaires. Using the internet in this way usually does not compromise the psychometric properties of such measures, and participants are typically not less representative of the general population than those of traditional studies. Technical guidelines are provided to set up such studies, and thorny issues such as participants' anonymity are discussed. We will also discuss issues regarding the assessment of minors and the repeated assessment of participants to assess developmental changes via the web. Second, the internet has changed the way people interact with each other. The study of the psychosocial consequences of this development is called cyberpsychology. We review emerging findings from this young discipline, with a focus on developmentally-relevant implications such as the use of the internet by adolescents to disclose personal information. C1 [Denissen, Jaap J. A.; Neumann, Linus] Humboldt Univ, D-1086 Berlin, Germany. [van Zalk, Maarten] Univ Orebro, Orebro, Sweden. C3 Humboldt University of Berlin; Orebro University RP Denissen, JJA (corresponding author), Humbodt Univ Berlin Dev Psychol, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany. EM jjadenissen@gmail.com CR Alterovitz SSR, 2009, PSYCHOL AGING, V24, P513, DOI 10.1037/a0015897 [Anonymous], 2007, OXFORD HDB INTERNET [Anonymous], 2010, ADV METHODS BEHAV RE Bargh JA, 2004, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V55, P573, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922 Baumer DL, 2004, COMPUT SECUR, V23, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2003.11.001 Bennett S, 2008, BRIT J EDUC TECHNOL, V39, P775, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x Birnbaum MH, 2004, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V55, P803, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601 Blais J., 2008, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V37, P49, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10964-007-9262-7 BLOCK J, 1997, PIECES PERSONALITY P, P33 Block JJ, 2008, AM J PSYCHIAT, V165, P306, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07101556 Bosnjak M., 2001, J COMPUT MEDIATED CO, V6, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1083-6101.2001.TB0 Buchanan E. A., 2003, READINGS VIRTUAL RES Campbell AJ, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P69, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.69 CARSTENSEN LL, 1992, PSYCHOL AGING, V7, P331, DOI 10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331 Chen YW, 2002, EDUC GERONTOL, V28, P731, DOI 10.1080/03601270290099921 DENISSEN JJA, 2005, BERLIN DIARY STUDY Ess C., 2007, OXFORD HDB INTERNET, P487 Ess C., 2002, ETHICAL DECISION MAK Fan WM, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015 FIELDING NG, 2008, SAGE HDB WEB BASED R Fraley R.C., 2004, CONDUCT BEHAV RES IN FRIEDMAN B, 2005, SECURITY USABILITY, P477 Frijns T, 2010, J ADOLESCENCE, V33, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.05.010 GAISER TJ, 2009, GUIDE CONDUCTING WEB Goritz AS, 2006, INT J INTERNET SCI, V1, P58 Gosling S., 2007, P INT C WEBL SOC MED Gosling SD, 2004, AM PSYCHOL, V59, P93, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93 Greenfield PM, 2004, J APPL DEV PSYCHOL, V25, P751, DOI 10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.008 Haddon L., 2009, EU KIDS ONLINE FINAL *INT WORLD STATS, 2001, INT US STAT INT BIG Johnson JA, 2005, J RES PERS, V39, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.009 Joinson A. N., 2007, OXFORD HDB INTERNET, V2374252 Joinson AN, 2007, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V23, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.012 Kerr M, 2000, DEV PSYCHOL, V36, P366, DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.36.3.366 Kiiski S, 2002, INF ECON POLICY, V14, P297, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6245(01)00071-3 KINTZ BL, 1965, PSYCHOL BULL, V63, P223, DOI 10.1037/h0021718 KRANTZ JH, 2000, PSYCHOL EXPT INTERNE, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012099980-4/50003-4 Kraut R, 1998, AM PSYCHOL, V53, P1017, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017 Kraut R, 2002, J SOC ISSUES, V58, P49, DOI 10.1111/1540-4560.00248 Kraut R, 2004, AM PSYCHOL, V59, P105, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105 Ladd GT, 2002, PSYCHOL ADDICT BEHAV, V16, P76, DOI 10.1037//0893-164X.16.1.76 Livingstone S, 2008, NEW MEDIA SOC, V10, P393, DOI 10.1177/1461444808089415 Marcus B, 2007, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V25, P372, DOI 10.1177/0894439307297606 McGraw KO, 2000, PSYCHOL SCI, V11, P502, DOI 10.1111/1467-9280.00296 Mckee H, 2008, COLL COMPOS COMMUN, V59, P711 Meerkerk GJ, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P95, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.95 Michalak EE, 1998, EUR PSYCHOL, V3, P70, DOI 10.1027/1016-9040.3.1.70 Nosek BA, 2002, J SOC ISSUES, V58, P161, DOI 10.1111/1540-4560.00254 Patchin JW, 2006, YOUTH VIOLENCE JUV J, V4, P148, DOI [10.1177/1541204006286288, DOI 10.1177/1541204006286288, https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288] Peden B. F., 2004, READINGS VIRTUAL RES, P1 Peter J, 2009, HUM COMMUN RES, V35, P171, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01343.x Pullmann H, 2009, EXP AGING RES, V35, P20, DOI 10.1080/03610730802544708 Reips U. D., 2000, PSYCHOL EXPT INTERNE, P89, DOI [10.1016/B978-012099980-4/50005-8, DOI 10.1016/B978-012099980-4/50005-8] Reips UD, 2002, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V20, P241, DOI 10.1177/08939302020003002 Rentfrow PJ, 2003, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V84, P1236, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1236 Selfhout MHW, 2009, J ADOLESCENCE, V32, P819, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.011 SELFHOUT MHW, 2010, WHO BENEFITS CHATTIN Skitka LJ, 2006, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V57, P529, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190048 Soto CJ, 2008, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V94, P718, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718 SPEARS R, 1994, COMMUN RES, V21, P427, DOI 10.1177/009365094021004001 Srivastava S, 2003, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V84, P1041, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1041 Steinfield C, 2008, J APPL DEV PSYCHOL, V29, P434, DOI 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002 Subrahmanyam K, 2009, BRIT J DEV PSYCHOL, V27, P219, DOI 10.1348/026151008X345979 Valkenburg PM, 2008, COMMUN RES, V35, P208, DOI 10.1177/0093650207313164 Valkenburg PM, 2009, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V18, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x Valkenburg PM, 2005, NEW MEDIA SOC, V7, P383, DOI 10.1177/1461444805052282 Vazire S, 2004, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V87, P123, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.123 Vogt DS, 2005, J PERS ASSESS, V84, P239, DOI 10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_03 Widyanto L., 2006, INT J MENTAL HLTH AD, V4, P31, DOI 10.1007/s11469-006-9009-9 Williams D, 2007, HUM COMMUN RES, V33, P427, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00306.x Wright KB, 2005, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V10 Young K. S., 1996, 104 ANN M AM PSYCH A, DOI [10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237, DOI 10.1089/CPB.1998.1.237] Zur O, 2009, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V40, P22, DOI 10.1037/a0014745 NR 73 TC 56 Z9 57 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD PI LONDON PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND PD NOV PY 2010 VL 34 IS 6 BP 564 EP 575 DI 10.1177/0165025410383746 WC Psychology, Developmental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Gupta, A Dhingra, A AF Gupta, Abhishek Dhingra, Anurag TI The Role of Primary Care Physicians in Curtailing Harmful Social Media Trends SO CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE LA English DT Article DE cyberpsychology; Internet trends; social media risks; tidepod ID INFLAMMATION AB Social media platforms, such as YouTube and Instagram, have become the latest medium for communication with a vast potential for influencing society. With their rise, a virtual market now exists where attention in the form of "likes," "views," and "followers" is traded for a monetary and psychological benefit. Amid this trade, physically risky behaviors have arisen to become a new attraction for attention, leading to numerous "trends" that encourage the same risk-taking behavior. Such trends, even those with a positive goal, have simultaneously led to injuries and fatalities, which highlights the necessity of a proactive approach to curtail the same. While media outlets and some non-governmental organizations usually highlight the risks of participating in these trends, the healthcare community has yet to have a collective and organized response to extreme social media participation. As such, a collaborative effort involving multiple tiers of the healthcare community is required to successfully prevent vulnerable populations from falling prey to the virtual attention-based economy of extreme social media participation. C1 [Gupta, Abhishek] Univ Toronto, Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Geriatr, Toronto, ON, Canada. [Dhingra, Anurag] Star Med Ctr, Family Med, Mississauga, ON, Canada. C3 University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction & Mental Health - Canada RP Gupta, A (corresponding author), Univ Toronto, Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Geriatr, Toronto, ON, Canada. EM abhishekgupta2000@gmail.com CR Ali Rushna, 2015, Surg Neurol Int, V6, P66, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.155759 Colotta F, 2009, CARCINOGENESIS, V30, P1073, DOI 10.1093/carcin/bgp127 Conti Alfredo, 2010, Cancers (Basel), V2, P693, DOI 10.3390/cancers2020693 Falip M, 2013, CNS DRUGS, V27, P611, DOI 10.1007/s40263-013-0078-6 Galvao Rui Pedro, 2013, Curr Pathobiol Rep, V1, P19 Garces J, 2016, WORLD NEUROSURG, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.037 Ha E.T., 2014, NEUROIMMUNOL NEUROIN, V1, P66 Hamlat A, 2005, J NEURO-ONCOL, V74, P187, DOI 10.1007/s11060-004-5175-4 Kucera JN, 2011, J RADIOL CASE REP, V5, P10, DOI 10.3941/jrcr.v5i4.592 Mostofa AGM, 2017, BIOMOLECULES, V7, DOI 10.3390/biom7020034 Ray M Jordan, 2012, Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent), V25, P23 Sahuc P, 2017, WORLD NEUROSURG, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.025 Suzuki K, 2010, J NEURO-ONCOL, V99, P147, DOI 10.1007/s11060-009-0109-9 Urbanska K, 2014, WSPOLCZESNA ONKOL, V18, P307, DOI 10.5114/wo.2014.40559 NR 14 TC 0 Z9 0 PU CUREUS INC PI PALO ALTO PA PO BOX 61002, PALO ALTO, CA 94306 USA PD SEP PY 2018 VL 10 IS 9 AR e3271 DI 10.7759/cureus.3271 WC Medicine, General & Internal SC General & Internal Medicine ER PT J AU Lustgarten, SD Elhai, JD AF Lustgarten, Samuel D. Elhai, Jon D. TI Technology use in mental health practice and research: Legal and ethical risks SO CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE LA English DT Review DE cyberpsychology; data security; ethical considerations; privacy and confidentiality; technology ID TELEMENTAL HEALTH; DELPHI POLL; COMMUNICATION; THERAPY; ANXIETY; FUTURE; CONFIDENTIALITY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; PRIVACY; MODEL AB Mental health professionals are tasked with upholding guidelines, principles, and standards set forth by professional organizations and local jurisdictions. Simultaneously, providers are increasingly expected to utilize technology with research participants and patients in psychotherapy and to communicate with other professionals. Digital methods such as text messaging, data storage, record keeping, and videoconferencing have all moved the boundaries of professional work beyond physical office spaces. This synergy between mental healthcare delivery and technology use has empowered providers to think beyond traditional models of care and reach populations who otherwise might not be able to receive services. However, the development and understanding of ethical and legal concern have been hampered by few training opportunities and the absence of competency standards. This article provides specific areas of risk, example scenarios where technology is used, and recommendations for providers to consider. C1 [Lustgarten, Samuel D.] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA. [Elhai, Jon D.] Univ Toledo, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA. C3 University of Iowa; University System of Ohio; University of Toledo RP Lustgarten, SD (corresponding author), Univ Iowa, Dept Psychol & Quantitat Fdn, Counseling Psychol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA. EM Sam.Lustgarten@gmail.com CR Abelson Harold, 2015, KEYS DOORMATS MANDAT American Counseling Association, 2014, COD OF ETH American Psychological Association, 2017, COD ETH COND RES TEA Arora M., 2012, SECURE IS AES BRUTE Barnett JE, 2011, PSYCHOTHERAPY, V48, P103, DOI 10.1037/a0023381 Basile K. C., 2011, NATL INTIMATE PARTNE Colbow AJ, 2013, TRAIN EDUC PROF PSYC, V7, P155, DOI 10.1037/a0033454 Crowley JD, 2012, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V43, P65, DOI 10.1037/a0026212 Daniel MH, 2014, EQUIVALENCE Q INTERA Delsignore A, 2016, PSYCHIAT RES, V244, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.07.038 Devereaux RL, 2012, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V43, P627, DOI 10.1037/a0028268 Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2016, LARG WORD LIST Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2017, EFF DIC GEN PASSPHR Elhai JD, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V70, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.002 Elhai JD, 2016, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V77, P262, DOI 10.4088/JCP.14r09506 Elhai JD, 2015, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V46, P444, DOI 10.1037/pro0000054 Elhai JD, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V54, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.057 Glosoff HL, 1997, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V28, P573, DOI 10.1037/0735-7028.28.6.573 Glover JA, 2013, TELEMED E-HEALTH, V19, P474, DOI 10.1089/tmj.2012.0182 Google Inc, 2015, SSL SEARCH Goss CW, 2017, PSYCHOL SERV, V14, P270, DOI 10.1037/ser0000149 Joint Task Force Dev Telepsycholog, 2013, AM PSYCHOL, V68, P791, DOI 10.1037/a0035001 KLEESPIES PM, 1993, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V24, P477, DOI 10.1037/0735-7028.24.4.477 Kruger J, 1999, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V77, P1121, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121 Lannin DG, 2013, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V44, P135, DOI 10.1037/a0031794 Lustgarten SD, 2017, AM PSYCHOL, V72, P159, DOI 10.1037/a0040321 Lustgarten SD, 2015, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V46, P154, DOI 10.1037/pro0000018 Mack CA, 2011, IEEE T SEMICONDUCT M, V24, P202, DOI 10.1109/TSM.2010.2096437 Matthews T, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM SIGCHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'17), P2189, DOI 10.1145/3025453.3025875 McCann E., 2014, HLTHCARE IT NEWS Moore G. E., 1965, ELECTRONICS, V38, P114 Norcross JC, 2002, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V33, P316, DOI 10.1037//0735-7028.33.3.316 Norcross JC, 2013, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V44, P363, DOI 10.1037/a0034633 NPR, 2015, APPL CEO TIM COOK PR Oxford Dictionaries, 2015, PRIVACY Pearson Education Inc, 2015, Q INT DAT SEC PRIV Penney J., 2016, BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY, V31, P117, DOI [DOI 10.15779/Z38SS13, 10.15779/Z38SS13] RUBANOWITZ DE, 1987, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V18, P613, DOI 10.1037/0735-7028.18.6.613 Salleh A, 2015, ASIA PAC EDUC REV, V16, P549, DOI 10.1007/s12564-015-9393-6 Serri T., 2017, AKRON LAW REV, V50, P933 SHAH ST, 1970, PROF PSYCHOL, V1, P159, DOI 10.1037/h0029222 SMITH D, 1995, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V26, P499, DOI 10.1037/0735-7028.26.5.499 Steinfeld BI, 2011, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V42, P426, DOI 10.1037/a0025674 U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights, 2013, HIPAA ADM SIMPL REG US Department of Health & Human Services, 2017, STOL LAPT LEAD IMP H VANDECREEK L, 1987, J COUNS PSYCHOL, V34, P62, DOI 10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.62 Zur, 2007, BOUNDARIES PSYCHOTHE, P133, DOI DOI 10.1037/11563-008 NR 47 TC 26 Z9 27 PU WILEY PI HOBOKEN PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA PD JUN PY 2018 VL 25 IS 2 AR e12234 DI 10.1111/cpsp.12234 WC Psychology, Clinical SC Psychology ER PT J AU Stopfer, JM Egloff, B Nestler, S Back, MD AF Stopfer, Juliane M. Egloff, Boris Nestler, Steffen Back, Mitja D. TI Being popular in online social networks: How agentic, communal, and creativity traits relate to judgments of status and liking SO JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY LA English DT Article DE Internet/cyberpsychology; Online social networks; Personality; Agency; Communion; Popularity; Status; Liking; Zero acquaintance; Lens model ID PERSONALITY JUDGMENTS; THIN SLICES; SELF-ESTEEM; NARCISSISM; AGENCY; WEB; MANIFESTATIONS; BEHAVIOR; IMPRESSIONS; CIRCUMPLEX AB We investigated how personality affects both peer-perceived popularity (status) and sociometric popularity (liking) in online social networks (OSNs). Self-ratings of agentic (e.g., extraversion), communal (e.g., agreeableness), and creativity traits (e.g., openness) were collected from 103 OSN profile owners (targets). Unacquainted perceivers provided status and liking judgments based on either targets' full OSN profiles or profile pictures. Independent coders assessed behavioral cues (e.g., attractiveness) from targets' OSN profiles. Results showed that targets scoring high on agency were ascribed a high status (without necessarily being liked), whereas targets scoring high on creativity or communion were liked. Brunswikian lens model analyses revealed mediating behavioral cues. Analyses based on profile pictures suggested that the differentiated impact of personality on popularity is a fast process. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. C1 [Stopfer, Juliane M.; Nestler, Steffen; Back, Mitja D.] Univ Munster, Dept Psychol, D-48149 Munster, Germany. [Egloff, Boris] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Psychol, Mainz, Germany. C3 University of Munster; Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz RP Stopfer, JM (corresponding author), Univ Munster, Dept Psychol, D-48149 Munster, Germany. EM juliane.stopfer@uni-muenster.de CR Abele AE, 2007, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V93, P751, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751 Abele AE, 2008, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V38, P1202, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.575 ALEXANDER RD, 2005, DARWINISM PHILOS, P301 Altemeyer B., 1981, RIGHT WING AUTHORITA ALTSTOTTERGLEIC.C, 2004, Z DIFFERENTIELLE DIA, V25, P123, DOI DOI 10.1024/0170-1789.25.3.123 Ambady N, 2000, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V32, P201, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80006-4 Anderson C, 2001, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V81, P116, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.116 Asendorpf J. B., 1997, SHYNESS SOCIABILITY Back MD, 2011, EUR J PERSONALITY, V25, P225, DOI 10.1002/per.790 Back MD, 2010, PSYCHOL SCI, V21, P372, DOI 10.1177/0956797609360756 Back MD, 2010, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V98, P132, DOI 10.1037/a0016338 Bakan D., 1966, DUALITY HUMAN EXISTE Berry DS, 2000, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V26, P278, DOI 10.1177/0146167200265002 Borkenau P, 2004, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V86, P599, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599 Borkenau P., 2008, NEO 5 FACTOR INVENTO, V2 Borkenau P, 2009, J RES PERS, V43, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.007 BRADLEE PM, 1992, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V13, P821, DOI 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90056-U Brunswik E., 1956, PERCEPTION REPRESENT Buffardi LE, 2008, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V34, P1303, DOI 10.1177/0146167208320061 Campbell WK, 2002, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V28, P358, DOI 10.1177/0146167202286007 Cheng JT, 2013, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V104, P103, DOI 10.1037/a0030398 Cillessen AHN, 2005, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V14, P102, DOI 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x Digman JM, 1997, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V73, P1246, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246 Frimer JA, 2012, J PERS, V80, P1117, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00764.x GOLDBERG LR, 1993, AM PSYCHOL, V48, P26, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26 Gosling SD, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P483, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0087 Gosling SD, 2002, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V82, P379, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.379 Harper D., 2012, POPULAR Henrich J, 2001, EVOL HUM BEHAV, V22, P165, DOI 10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4 Hirsh JB, 2012, PSYCHOL SCI, V23, P578, DOI 10.1177/0956797611436349 Holtzman NS, 2011, J RES PERS, V45, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.09.002 KANFER A, 1993, J PERS, V61, P711, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00788.x KENNY DA, 1994, INTERPERSONAL PERCEP Kluemper DH, 2009, J MANAGE PSYCHOL, V24, P567, DOI 10.1108/02683940910974134 Kufner ACP, 2013, J PERS, V81, P184, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00795.x Kufner ACP, 2010, J RES PERS, V44, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.003 MCCRAE RR, 1989, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V56, P586, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.586 Mehl MR, 2006, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V90, P862, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.862 Muthen L. K., 2013, MPLUS USERS GUIDE Nesse Randolph M., 2007, Biology Theory, V2, P143, DOI 10.1162/biot.2007.2.2.143 Nestler S., CURRENT DIR IN PRESS Parsons T., 1955, FAMILY SOCIALIZATION Penton-Voak IS, 2006, SOC COGNITION, V24, P607, DOI 10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.607 Rentfrow PJ, 2006, PSYCHOL SCI, V17, P236, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01691.x Schutz A, 2004, DIAGNOSTICA, V50, P202, DOI 10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.202 Schutz A., 2006, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SEL SCHWARTZ SH, 1992, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V25, P1, DOI 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 Vazire S, 2004, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V87, P123, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.123 Vazire S, 2008, J RES PERS, V42, P1439, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.007 Ward LC, 2006, J PERS ASSESS, V86, P206, DOI 10.1207/s15327752jpa8602_10 Weisbuch M, 2009, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V45, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.009 Wesselmann ED, 2012, PSYCHOL SCI, V23, P166, DOI 10.1177/0956797611427921 Wojciszke B, 2009, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V39, P973, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.595 Wortman J, 2011, J RES PERS, V45, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.06.006 Zywica J, 2008, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V14, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01429.x NR 55 TC 32 Z9 33 PU ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE PI SAN DIEGO PA 525 B ST, STE 1900, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4495 USA PD OCT PY 2013 VL 47 IS 5 BP 592 EP 598 DI 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.005 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Walsh, EI Brinker, JK AF Walsh, Erin I. Brinker, Jay K. TI Delay between recruitment and participation impacts on preinclusion attrition SO QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Article DE Longitudinal methodology; Research methods; Communication; Measurement; Internet; Cyberpsychology ID RESPONSE RATES; MAIL SURVEYS; METAANALYSIS; REMINDERS; LIFE; WEB AB Despite being a common aspect of psychological research, the impact of delay between recruitment and active participation on dropout rates has received little research attention. This is probably due to the intuitive sense that longer delays will increase the dropout rate. Preinclusion attrition diminishes sample sizes and may threaten data representativeness. One hundred and two university undergraduates were recruited to participate in a short, one-off study via Short Message Service (SMS). Upon receipt of an SMS indicating consent to participate, the researchers delayed sending the study questions for one day, one week, one month, or two months. Delay was significantly associated with response rate with an 80% response rate in the one-day delay condition, 56% at one week, and 42% at one month. No responses were received in the two-month delay condition. This research confirms that the delay between recruitment and active participation impacts on preinclusion attrition when conducting research via SMS. C1 [Walsh, Erin I.] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Psychol, Canberra, ACT 2106, Australia. [Brinker, Jay K.] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. C3 Australian National University; Swinburne University of Technology RP Walsh, EI (corresponding author), Australian Natl Univ, Bldg 49, Canberra, ACT 2106, Australia. EM erin.walsh@anu.edu.au CR [Anonymous], 2012, MIS Q Ashby R, 2011, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V64, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.020 BAUMAN JB, 1984, J APPL BEHAV ANAL, V17, P295, DOI 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-295 BLOOM HS, 1984, EVALUATION REV, V8, P225, DOI 10.1177/0193841X8400800205 Bolger N, 2003, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V54, P579, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030 Conner TS, 2012, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V3, P315, DOI 10.1177/1948550611419677 Cook C, 2000, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V60, P821, DOI 10.1177/00131640021970934 Cook TD, 1979, QUASIEXPERIMENTATION, P37 Dillman D. A., 2014, INTERNET PHONE MAIL Festinger DS, 2002, ADDICT BEHAV, V27, P131, DOI 10.1016/S0306-4603(01)00172-1 FLICK SN, 1988, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V8, P499, DOI 10.1016/0272-7358(88)90076-1 Hoffman KA, 2011, ADDICT BEHAV, V36, P643, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.031 Kendall PC, 1997, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V65, P883, DOI 10.1037/0022-006X.65.5.883 Ronka A, 2010, COMMUNITY WORK FAM, V13, P5, DOI 10.1080/13668800902823581 Shih TH, 2008, FIELD METHOD, V20, P249, DOI 10.1177/1525822X08317085 Song ZL, 2008, J APPL PSYCHOL, V93, P443, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.443 Virtanen V, 2007, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V25, P384, DOI 10.1177/0894439307299588 NR 17 TC 1 Z9 1 PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD PI ABINGDON PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND PD APR 3 PY 2015 VL 68 IS 4 BP 635 EP 640 DI 10.1080/17470218.2015.1008019 WC Psychology, Biological; Physiology; Psychology; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology; Physiology ER PT J AU Kushlev, K Proulx, JDE Dunn, EW AF Kushlev, Kostadin Proulx, Jason D. E. Dunn, Elizabeth W. TI Digitally connected, socially disconnected: The effects of relying on technology rather than other people SO COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR LA English DT Article DE Happiness; Human-computer interaction; Cyberpsychology; Social behavior; Well-being; Ubiquitous computing; Pervasive connectivity ID COMMUNICATION; REQUIREMENTS; INFORMATION; LONELINESS; HAPPINESS; NEED; SELF AB In less than a decade, smartphones have transformed how, when, and where people access information. We propose that turning to technology for information may lead individuals to miss out on opportunities to cultivate feelings of social connection. Testing this hypothesis, we asked participants to find an unfamiliar building and randomly assigned them to solve this everyday problem either with or without their smartphones. Compared to those who could not rely on technology, participants who used their smartphones found the building more easily but ended up feeling less socially connected. Although having access to smartphones improved participants' mood by making their task easier, this beneficial effect was diminished by the costs to social connection. Our findings provide the first experimental evidence that the benefits of pervasive connectivity may be undercut when technology supplants social Interactions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. C1 [Kushlev, Kostadin; Proulx, Jason D. E.; Dunn, Elizabeth W.] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychol, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. C3 University of British Columbia RP Kushlev, K (corresponding author), Univ Virginia, Dept Psychol, 102 Gilmer Hall,POB 400400, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA. EM kushlevk@gmail.com; j.proulxl9@gmail.com; edunn@psych.ubc.ca FU Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council [H08-02739] FX This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council [grant number H08-02739] awarded to Elizabeth Dunn. CR Abele AE, 2007, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V93, P751, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751 BAUMEISTER RF, 1995, PSYCHOL BULL, V117, P497, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 Braun Research Inc, 2015, BANK AM TRENDS CONS Cacioppo JT, 2006, J RES PERS, V40, P1054, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.007 Cumming G., 2013, UNDERSTANDING NEW ST DAFT RL, 1986, MANAGE SCI, V32, P554, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 Epley N, 2014, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V143, P1980, DOI 10.1037/a0037323 Ferrero G., 1894, REV PHILOS FRANCE ET, V37, P169 Fleeson W, 2002, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V83, P1409, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1409 Flynn FJ, 2008, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V95, P128, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.128 Guillory JE, 2015, PAIN MED, V16, P667, DOI 10.1111/pme.12610 Hall JA, 2012, NEW MEDIA SOC, V14, P316, DOI 10.1177/1461444811415047 Hayes A.F., 2013, INTRO MEDIATION MODE Kenrick DT, 2010, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V5, P292, DOI 10.1177/1745691610369469 Kock N, 2004, ORGAN SCI, V15, P327, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1040.0071 Kross E, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069841 Kushlev K, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0162130 Kushlev K, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V43, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.005 Lee RM, 2001, J COUNS PSYCHOL, V48, P310 Lyubomirsky S, 2010, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V5, P327, DOI 10.1177/1745691610369473 Mann T, 1990, GUIDE LIB RES METHOD Maslow AH, 1943, PSYCHOL REV, V50, P370, DOI 10.1037/h0054346 Mehl MR, 2010, PSYCHOL SCI, V21, P539, DOI 10.1177/0956797610362675 MYERS DG, 1995, PSYCHOL SCI, V6, P10, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00298.x Nelson SK, 2014, PSYCHOL BULL, V140, P846, DOI 10.1037/a0035444 Park J, 2016, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V200, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.048 Park N, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V62, P712, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.041 Peterson NA, 2008, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V36, P61, DOI 10.1002/jcop.20217 Pew Research Center, 2015, SMARTPH DIFF Pew Research Center, 2012, BEST WORST MOB CONN Pielot M, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION WITH MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICES (MOBILEHCI'14), P233, DOI 10.1145/2628363.2628364 Pollet TV, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P253, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0161 Reis HT, 2000, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V26, P419, DOI 10.1177/0146167200266002 RYAN RM, 1982, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V43, P450, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450 Ryan RM, 2000, AM PSYCHOL, V55, P68, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 RYFF CD, 1989, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V57, P1069, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069 Sandstrom GM, 2014, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V40, P910, DOI 10.1177/0146167214529799 Sandstrom GM, 2014, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V5, P437, DOI 10.1177/1948550613502990 Schimmack U, 2000, EUR J PERSONALITY, V14, P325, DOI 10.1002/1099-0984(200007/08)14:4<325::AID-PER380>3.3.CO;2-9 Schwartz T, 2015, ADDICTED DISTRACTION Turkle S., 2011, ALONE TOGETHER WHY W Turkle Sherry, 2015, RECLAIMING CONVERSAT Valkenburg PM, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V12, P1169, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00368.x van Baaren RB, 2004, PSYCHOL SCI, V15, P71, DOI 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501012.x Verduyn O., 2017, SOCIAL ISSU IN PRESS Vittengl JR, 1998, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V17, P196, DOI 10.1521/jscp.1998.17.2.196 Wesselmann ED, 2012, PSYCHOL SCI, V23, P166, DOI 10.1177/0956797611427921 WHEELER L, 1983, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V45, P943, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.943 Zelenski JM, 2013, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V104, P1092, DOI 10.1037/a0032281 NR 49 TC 25 Z9 25 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD NOV PY 2017 VL 76 BP 68 EP 74 DI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.001 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Rubtsova, OV AF Rubtsova, O. V. TI Digital Media as a New Means of Mediation (Part One) SO KULTURNO-ISTORICHESKAYA PSIKHOLOGIYA-CULTURAL-HISTORICAL PSYCHOLOGY LA Russian DT Article DE information revolution; digital media; cyberpsychology; mediation; tools; signs; development of higher mental functions AB The article begins the cycle "Digital media as a new means of mediation". "Digitalization" is interpreted as a challenge to contemporary psychology in general and cultural-historical theory in particular. The results of a theoretical and methodological analysis of the possibilities of regarding digital media as a new phenomenon, combining components of a sign and of a tool, are presented. Possible directions of research on various aspects of applying digital media in the framework of the cultural-historical concept are discussed. It is argued, that perceiving digital media as a new means of mediation opens a wide range of possibilities for investigating development of higher mental functions in digital society. One of the further steps of research consists in demonstrating, how traditional types of activity (e.g. reading, writing, play and communication) are transformed in digital contexts and what effects it can have on such functions as attention, memory, will and thinking. C1 [Rubtsova, O. V.] Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Contemporary Childhood, Moscow, Russia. C3 Moscow State University of Psychology & Education RP Rubtsova, OV (corresponding author), Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Contemporary Childhood, Moscow, Russia. EM ovrubsova@mail.ru CR Attrill- Smith A, 2018, OXFORD HDB CYBERPSHY, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198812746.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198812746.001.0001] Azimov EH. G., 2009, NOVYI SLOVAR METODIC Baudrillard Jean, 1981, SIMULACRES SIMULATIO Blumberg FC, 2018, COGNITIVE DEV DIGITA Buhl A., 1997, VIRTUELLE GESELLSCHA DAFERMOS M, 2018, RETHINKING CULTURAL Floridi L, 2014, 4 REVOLUTION INFOSPH Giesecke M., 2002, MYTHEN BUCHKULTUR VI Giesecke M., 1990, U Q GERMAN REV ARTS, P219 Knizhichenko A.S., IZMENENIE INFORM Lysak I.V., 2013, IZVESTIYA YUZHNOGO F, P256 McLuhan M., 2013, GALAKTIKA GUTENBERGA MILGRAM P, 1994, IEICE T INF SYST, VE77D, P1321 Otradnova O.V., 2013, MOLODOY UCHENYY, P647 Rubtsova O.V., 2017, GLOBAL YOUTH DIGITAL, P53 Rubtsova O.V., 2017, MEZHD S LS VYG SOVR, P85 Ruckriem G., 2011, TATIGKEITSTHEORIE J, P77 Ruckriem G., 2010, KULTURNO ISTORICHESK, P30 Soldatova GU, 2018, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V9, P71, DOI 10.17759/sps.2018090308 Tikhomirov O.K., 1993, PSYHOLOGICHESKIY ZH Tikhomirov O.K. L.S., 1981, NAUCHNOE TVORCHESTVO, P151 Veresov N.N., 2007, NOVOYE LITERATURNOYE Voiskounsky A.E., 2010, PSIKHOLOGIYA INTERNE Voiskounsky A.E., 2002, UCHENYE ZAPISKI KAFE Voropaev M.V., 2010, VOSPITANIE VIRTUALNY Vygotsky L.S., 1982, SOBRANIE SOCHINENIY, V1 Vygotsky L.S., 1983, SOBRANIE SOCHINENIY, V3 WEISER M, 1991, SCI AM, V265, P94, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94 NR 28 TC 15 Z9 20 PU MOSCOW STATE UNIV PSYCHOLOGY & EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2019 VL 15 IS 3 BP 117 EP 124 DI 10.17759/chp.2019150312 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Levordashka, A Utz, S AF Levordashka, Ana Utz, Sonja TI Spontaneous Trait Inferences on Social Media SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE LA English DT Article DE spontaneous trait inferences; false recognition; social media; Internet; cyberpsychology; impression formation; person perception ID IMPRESSION-FORMATION; FACEBOOK; PERSONALITY; INFORMATION; BEHAVIOR; PROFILE; FRIENDS; OTHERS; FACES AB The present research investigates whether spontaneous trait inferences occur under conditions characteristic of social media and networking sites: nonextreme, ostensibly self-generated content, simultaneous presentation of multiple cues, and self-paced browsing. We used an established measure of trait inferences (false recognition paradigm) and a direct assessment of impressions. Without being asked to do so, participants spontaneously formed impressions of people whose status updates they saw. Our results suggest that trait inferences occurred from nonextreme self-generated content, which is commonly found in social media updates (Experiment 1) and when nine status updates from different people were presented in parallel (Experiment 2). Although inferences did occur during free browsing, the results suggest that participants did not necessarily associate the traits with the corresponding status update authors (Experiment 3). Overall, the findings suggest that spontaneous trait inferences occur on social media. We discuss implications for online communication and research on spontaneous trait inferences. C1 [Levordashka, Ana; Utz, Sonja] Leibniz Inst Wissensmed, Schleichstr 6, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany. C3 Leibniz Institut fur Wissensmedien RP Levordashka, A (corresponding author), Leibniz Inst Wissensmed, Schleichstr 6, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany. EM a.levordashka@imw-tuebingen.de FU European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)/ERC [312420] FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007e2013)/ERC Grant agreement no. 312420. CR AMBADY N, 1992, PSYCHOL BULL, V111, P256, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256 Antheunis ML, 2011, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V16, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01545.x Back MD, 2010, PSYCHOL SCI, V21, P372, DOI 10.1177/0956797609360756 Bainbridge WA, 2013, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V142, P1323, DOI 10.1037/a0033872 Bliss-Moreau E, 2008, EMOTION, V8, P479, DOI 10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.479 CARLSTON DE, 1995, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V69, P420, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.429 CARLSTON DE, 1994, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V66, P840, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.840 Donath J, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V13, P231, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00394.x Evans D., 2008, P INT C WEBL SOC MED, P45 FISKE ST, 1980, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V38, P889, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.889 Gosling SD, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P483, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0087 Levordashka A., 2016, SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Levordashka A, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V60, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.037 McCarthy RJ, 2011, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V47, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.015 Peirce JW, 2007, J NEUROSCI METH, V162, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 Pennington N, 2014, HUMOR, V27, P1, DOI 10.1515/humor-2013-0053 R Core Team, 2017, R LANG ENV STAT COMP Resnick Paul, 2001, HUM COMPUT INTERACT, P647 Rim S, 2009, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V45, P1088, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.015 Saribay SA, 2012, SOC PSYCHOL-GERMANY, V43, P196, DOI 10.1027/1864-9335/a000120 Simmons J.P., 2012, SPSPS DIALOGUE NEWSL, V26, P4, DOI [DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2160588, 10.2139/ssrn.2160588] Skowronski J.J., 2008, 1 IMPRESSIONS, P1 SKOWRONSKI JJ, 1989, PSYCHOL BULL, V105, P131, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131 Thompson C., 2008, NY TIMES, P1 Todd AR, 2011, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V47, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.006 Todorov A, 2005, SCIENCE, V308, P1623, DOI 10.1126/science.1110589 Todorov A, 2004, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V87, P482, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.482 Todorov A, 2003, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V39, P549, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00059-3 Todorov A, 2002, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V83, P1051, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1051 Tong S., 2011, COMPUTER MEDIATED CO, P98, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Uleman JS, 2008, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V59, P329, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093707 Utz S, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V45, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.076 Utz S, 2010, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V15, P314, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01522.x Walther JB, 2008, HUM COMMUN RES, V34, P28, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00312.x Westerman D, 2008, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V13, P751, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00418.x Wickham H, 2009, USE R, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 NR 36 TC 11 Z9 12 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC PI THOUSAND OAKS PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA PD JAN PY 2017 VL 8 IS 1 BP 93 EP 101 DI 10.1177/1948550616663803 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Stopfer, JM Braun, B Muller, KW Egloff, B AF Stopfer, Juliane M. Braun, Beate Mueller, Kai W. Egloff, Boris TI Narcissus plays video games SO PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES LA English DT Article DE Narcissism; Rivalry; Video games; Online behavior; Internet/cyberpsychology ID ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKS; PERSONALITY-INVENTORY; AGGRESSIVE-BEHAVIOR; PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR; GAMING ADDICTION; SELF-CONTROL; WORLD; MOTIVATIONS; ENHANCEMENT; EXPLORATION AB Two phenomena of our time have fascinated the general public and the scientific community alike: (a) narcissism as a personality characteristic with important implications for daily social functioning, and (b) the (vast) use of digital media such as video games. But how are these phenomena related to one another? To investigate this question, we administered an online survey to 2,891 individuals to assess their levels of narcissistic admiration and rivalry (NARQ; Back et al., 2013) and their video-gaming activities (frequency of playing, reasons for playing, preferred game genre and role). Results revealed that these narcissism dimensions were differentially related to video gaming: Individuals high on rivalry played video games for distraction and preferred action games and acting as lone fighters; those high on admiration played video games to stimulate their imagination and preferred the role of team leader. Findings were robust when controlling for sex, age, extraversion, and agreeableness. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. C1 [Stopfer, Juliane M.] Univ Gottingen, Dept Psychol, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany. [Braun, Beate; Mueller, Kai W.] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Mainz, Germany. [Egloff, Boris] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Psychol, Mainz, Germany. C3 University of Gottingen; Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz; Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz RP Stopfer, JM (corresponding author), Univ Gottingen, Dept Psychol, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany. EM jstopfer@uni-goettingen.de CR Ablow K., 2013, WE ARE RAISING GENER Ackerman RA, 2011, ASSESSMENT, V18, P67, DOI 10.1177/1073191110382845 Anderson CA, 2001, PSYCHOL SCI, V12, P353, DOI 10.1111/1467-9280.00366 Anderson CA, 2010, PSYCHOL BULL, V136, P151, DOI 10.1037/a0018251 Apperley TH, 2006, SIMULAT GAMING, V37, P6, DOI 10.1177/1046878105282278 Back MD, 2013, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V105, P1013, DOI 10.1037/a0034431 Back MD, 2010, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V98, P132, DOI 10.1037/a0016338 Back MD, 2009, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V97, P533, DOI 10.1037/a0016229 Barlett CP, 2009, SIMULAT GAMING, V40, P377, DOI 10.1177/1046878108327539 Bergman SM, 2011, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V50, P706, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.022 Bessiere K, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P530, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9994 Billieux J, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.021 Blair CA, 2008, HUM PERFORM, V21, P254, DOI 10.1080/08959280802137705 BRADLEE PM, 1992, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V13, P821, DOI 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90056-U Braun B, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V55, P406, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.041 Brunell AB, 2008, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V34, P1663, DOI 10.1177/0146167208324101 Buffardi LE, 2008, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V34, P1303, DOI 10.1177/0146167208320061 Bushman BJ, 1998, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V75, P219, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.219 BUSS DM, 1991, J PERS, V59, P179, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00773.x Buss DM, 1997, J RES PERS, V31, P193, DOI 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2175 Campbell WK, 2002, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V28, P484, DOI 10.1177/0146167202287006 Chory RM, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P191, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0076 COLVIN CR, 1995, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V68, P1152, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1152 Deters FG, 2014, J RES PERS, V53, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.004 Dietz TL, 1998, SEX ROLES, V38, P425, DOI 10.1023/A:1018709905920 Dobrowolski P, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V44, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.051 Dufner M, 2015, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V6, P447, DOI 10.1177/1948550614564224 Dufner M, 2013, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V39, P870, DOI 10.1177/0146167213483580 Elson M, 2014, EUR PSYCHOL, V19, P33, DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000147 Entertainment Software Association, 2014, ESS FACTS COMP VID G Fatfouta R, 2015, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V75, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.051 Foster JE, 2003, ECON THEOR, V22, P469, DOI 10.1007/s00199-002-0339-y Freud S., 1990, EINFUHRUNG NARZISSMU Gentile DA, 2011, PEDIATRICS, V127, pE319, DOI 10.1542/peds.2010-1353 Gosling SD, 1998, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V74, P1337, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1337 Graham LT, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P189, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0090 Hahn E, 2012, J RES PERS, V46, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.008 Hartmann T, 2006, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V11, P910, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00301.x Herodotou C, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V32, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.054 Homer BD, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P1782, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.018 Kernberg OF, 1998, DISORDERS OF NARCISSISM, P29 Kim EJ, 2008, EUR PSYCHIAT, V23, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.10.010 Kozlov MD, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P711, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0310 Lang FR, 2011, BEHAV RES METHODS, V43, P548, DOI 10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z Latham AJ, 2013, FRONT PSYCHOL, V4, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00629 Leckelt M, 2015, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V109, P856, DOI 10.1037/pspp0000057 McCreery MP, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P976, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.019 Mehroof M, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P313, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0229 Moller I, 2009, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V35, P75, DOI 10.1002/ab.20290 Muller KW, 2014, EUR ADDICT RES, V20, P129, DOI 10.1159/000355832 Nielsen Company, 2015, MULT GAM WIN1 Oltmanns TF, 2004, J RES PERS, V38, P216, DOI 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00066-7 Paulhus DL, 1998, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V74, P1197, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1197 Paulhus DL, 2001, PSYCHOL INQ, V12, P228 Przybylski AK, 2012, PSYCHOL SCI, V23, P69, DOI 10.1177/0956797611418676 RASKIN R, 1988, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V54, P890, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890 Ryan T, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1658, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004 Schupp J., 2008, ZUSAMMENSTELLUNG SOZ Sorokowski P, 2015, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V85, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.004 Statista, 2015, NUMB VID GAM WORLDW Stenico C, 2014, J SOC PSYCHOL, V154, P101, DOI 10.1080/00224545.2013.864595 Stopfer JM, 2014, EUR J PERSONALITY, V28, P73, DOI 10.1002/per.1935 Stopfer JM, 2013, J RES PERS, V47, P592, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.005 Twenge J. M., 2009, NARCISSISM EPIDEMIC Visser M, 2013, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V43, P1508, DOI 10.1111/jasp.12144 von Salisch M, 2011, MEDIA PSYCHOL, V14, P233, DOI 10.1080/15213269.2011.596468 Wang CW, 2015, ADDICT BEHAV, V42, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.039 Yee N, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P772, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772 Yoon G, 2013, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V43, P1814, DOI 10.1111/jasp.12133 NR 69 TC 14 Z9 14 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD DEC PY 2015 VL 87 BP 212 EP 218 DI 10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.011 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Kushlev, K Heintzelman, SJ AF Kushlev, Kostadin Heintzelman, Samantha J. TI Put the Phone Down: Testing a Complement-Interfere Model of Computer-Mediated Communication in the Context of Face-to-Face Interactions SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE LA English DT Article DE communication; Internet; cyberpsychology; social interaction; well-being; computer-mediated communication; media psychology; social connectedness; smartphones; human-computer interaction ID EXPERIENCE; REQUIREMENTS; EMOTIONS AB If there ever was a key to happiness, this key would open a door that leads straight to a rich social life. And in the era of smartphones, this key to social connection is in our pockets anytime and anywhere. Or is it? Using the experience sampling method (ESM), we explore the use of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in the context of face-to-face (FtF) social interactions, testing two competing hypotheses: (1) a complementarity hypothesis stating that more channels of communication should be associated with higher well-being and (2) an interference hypothesis stating that FtF interactions could be impoverished by adding computer-mediated channels of communication. We surveyed 174 millennials (M-age = 19.28; range: 17-22) 5 times a day over a period of a week (4,508 episodes). When participants reported a mix of CMC and FtF socializing in the same episode, they felt worse and less connected than when solely interacting FtF. C1 [Kushlev, Kostadin; Heintzelman, Samantha J.] Univ Virginia, Dept Psychol, 485 McCormick Rd,Gilmer Hall,Room 102, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA. C3 University of Virginia RP Kushlev, K (corresponding author), Univ Virginia, Dept Psychol, 485 McCormick Rd,Gilmer Hall,Room 102, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA. EM kushlevk@gmail.com CR BAUMEISTER RF, 1995, PSYCHOL BULL, V117, P497, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 Birnholtz Jeremy, 2012, Interactions, V19, P32, DOI 10.1145/2334184.2334193 Braun Research Inc, 2015, TRENDS CONS MOB REP, P1 Burke M, 2016, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V21, P265, DOI 10.1111/jcc4.12162 COHEN J, 1992, PSYCHOL BULL, V112, P155, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 DAFT RL, 1986, MANAGE SCI, V32, P554, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 Diener E, 2002, PSYCHOL SCI, V13, P81, DOI 10.1111/1467-9280.00415 Duggan, 2013, CELL PHONE ACTIVITIE Epley N, 2014, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V143, P1980, DOI 10.1037/a0037323 Experian Marketing Services, 2013, 2013 DRUG TREND REP, P1 Fiske S. T., 2014, SOCIAL BEINGS CORE M, V4th Griffin J., 2010, THE LONELY SOC, P1 Guillory JE, 2015, PAIN MED, V16, P667, DOI 10.1111/pme.12610 Hall JA, 2012, NEW MEDIA SOC, V14, P316, DOI 10.1177/1461444811415047 Hektner J. M., 2006, EXPERIENCE SAMPLING Hofmann W, 2015, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V33, P235, DOI 10.1177/0894439314525117 Kahneman D, 2004, SCIENCE, V306, P1776, DOI 10.1126/science.1103572 Kashdan TB, 2006, PSYCHOL SCI, V17, P120, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01674.x Kenrick DT, 2010, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V5, P292, DOI 10.1177/1745691610369469 Killingsworth MA, 2010, SCIENCE, V330, P932, DOI 10.1126/science.1192439 Kushlev K, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V43, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.005 Larson R., 1983, NEW DIRECTIONS METHO, V15, P41, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_2, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_2] Liefooghe B, 2008, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V34, P478, DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.478 Maas C. J. M., 2005, METHODOLOGY, V1, P86, DOI DOI 10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86 Maslow AH, 1943, PSYCHOL REV, V50, P370, DOI 10.1037/h0054346 Meeker M., 2013, INTERNET TRENDS Miron-Shatz T, 2009, EMOTION, V9, P885, DOI 10.1037/a0017823 Newton V, 2012, PREV HEAR LOSS, P1 Ophir E, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P15583, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0903620106 Park N, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V62, P712, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.041 Pew Research Center, 2015, SMARTPH DIFF, P1, DOI [10. 1017/CBO9781107415324. 004, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004] Pielot M, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION WITH MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICES (MOBILEHCI'14), P233, DOI 10.1145/2628363.2628364 Pittman M, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V62, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084 Pollet TV, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P253, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0161 Rainie L., 2015, AM VIEWS MOBILE ETIQ Reinsch NL, 2008, ACAD MANAGE REV, V33, P391, DOI 10.2307/20159404 Reis HT, 2000, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V26, P419, DOI 10.1177/0146167200266002 Rubinstein JS, 2001, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V27, P763, DOI 10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.763 Ryan RM, 2000, AM PSYCHOL, V55, P68, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 RYFF CD, 1995, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V69, P719 Sandstrom GM, 2014, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V5, P437, DOI 10.1177/1948550613502990 Schimmack U, 2000, EUR J PERSONALITY, V14, P325, DOI 10.1002/1099-0984(200007/08)14:4<325::AID-PER380>3.3.CO;2-9 Turkle S., 2011, ALONE TOGETHER WHY W Turkle Sherry, 2015, RECLAIMING CONVERSAT Valkenburg PM, 2007, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V12, P1169, DOI 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00368.x Wilson RE, 2012, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V7, P203, DOI 10.1177/1745691612442904 NR 46 TC 23 Z9 24 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC PI THOUSAND OAKS PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA PD AUG PY 2018 VL 9 IS 6 BP 702 EP 710 DI 10.1177/1948550617722199 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT C AU Drange, T Van Wyk, N AF Drange, T. Van Wyk, N. BE Chova, LG Martinez, AL Torres, IC TI SOCIAL ANXIETY - AN INCREASING CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATORS SO EDULEARN19: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES SE EDULEARN Proceedings LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Online Education; Cyberpsychology; Social Anxiety ID PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; SELF-REPORT AB The traditional lecture has evolved over many centuries, and much research has been done regarding the effectiveness of the traditional lecture. One of the major influences on the lecture format - is the evolving of technology, where books became available for the people, and the resources on the Internet became an interesting player in all educational work. What we as educators must also realise - is that not only the content, learning materials and technology has evolved or changed. Our students have also changed. This paper will discuss these changes with the results of a questionnaire as a basis. The questionnaire was published to around four hundred students, both online based students and campus-based students, and it was based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Two hundred and sixty-four students responded, and over 70% of these students score above 30, which indicates that social anxiety is probable. A somewhat unexpected result is that it applies equally to both groups of students, and the discussion in this paper will seek to explain these results. C1 [Drange, T.] Univ Sunderland, Sunderland, Durham, England. [Van Wyk, N.] Noroff Sch Technol & Digital Media, Kristianstad, Sweden. C3 University of Sunderland RP Drange, T (corresponding author), Univ Sunderland, Sunderland, Durham, England. CR Bandelow B, 2015, DIALOGUES CLIN NEURO, V17, P327 Bhattacharya L., 2013, MED J DY PATIL U, V6, P132 Brandmo C., 2018, SOC PSYCHOL EDUC, DOI [10.1007/s11218-018-9461-y, DOI 10.1007/S11218-018-9461-Y.2018] Cuhadar C, 2012, COMPUT EDUC, V59, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.029 Fresco DM, 2001, PSYCHOL MED, V31, P1025, DOI 10.1017/S0033291701004056 Ginder S.A., 2018, 2019021REV NCES US D Heimberg RG, 1999, PSYCHOL MED, V29, P199, DOI 10.1017/S0033291798007879 Mennin DS., 2002, J ANXIETY DISORDERS, V16, P661 Meuret AE, 2016, BEHAV RES THER, V81, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2016.03.008 Olfson M, 2000, AM J PSYCHIAT, V157, P521, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.4.521 Per Villiers D., 2009, THESIS Rytwinski NK, 2009, DEPRESS ANXIETY, V26, P34, DOI 10.1002/da.20503 Senthil V, 2018, EDUC INF TECHNOL, V23, P2901, DOI 10.1007/s10639-018-9749-8 Taylor M.L., 2006, COLLECTION PAPERS SE, V2 Wallechinsky D., 1977, BOOK LISTS Wetterberg L., 2004, S AFRICAN PSYCHIAT R, P30 Wu C.L., 2018, P 18 INT C EL BUS IC, P364 NR 17 TC 1 Z9 1 PU IATED-INT ASSOC TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT PI VALENICA PA LAURI VOLPI 6, VALENICA, BURJASSOT 46100, SPAIN PY 2019 BP 6045 EP 6051 WC Education & Educational Research SC Education & Educational Research ER PT J AU Yung, R Khoo-Lattimore, C Potter, LE AF Yung, Ryan Khoo-Lattimore, Catheryn Potter, Leigh Ellen TI VR the world: Experimenting with emotion and presence for tourism marketing * SO JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM MANAGEMENT LA English DT Article DE Virtual reality; Tourism marketing; Presence; Emotion; Intention ID VIRTUAL-REALITY; DESTINATION IMAGE; IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTS; MODEL; INTENTION; RESPONSES; SENSE; TECHNOLOGIES; SATISFACTION AB The concept of presence, ubiquitous in VR research, remains in infancy in tourism literature. Researchers in the field have called for empirical studies into the determinants as well as consequences of presence, particularly in commercial environments. The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of VR as a tourism marketing tool through presence and emotion ? an association that has been suggested in cyberpsychology studies. Using a within-subjects experiment method, 72 participants experienced computer-generated, fully synthetic virtual environments of a cruise ship. The experiences were administered via pictures, video, and VR. The findings suggest that VR is significantly more effective than traditional media in evoking positive emotional responses to the stimuli. Theoretical implications include suggestions that fully-interactive synthetic VR may be more effective than 360? VR due to the importance of engagement as a presence determinant. Managerial implications include suggestions to focus on engagement mechanics, rather than chasing photo-realistic VR adfor on emotional C1 [Yung, Ryan; Khoo-Lattimore, Catheryn] Griffith Univ, Dept Tourism Sport & Hotel Management, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. [Potter, Leigh Ellen] Griffith Univ, Sch Informat & Commun Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. C3 Griffith University; Griffith University RP Yung, R (corresponding author), Griffith Univ, Dept Tourism Sport & Hotel Management, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. EM ryan.yung@griffithuni.edu.au CR Agapito D, 2013, J TRAVEL TOUR MARK, V30, P471, DOI 10.1080/10548408.2013.803393 ANDREASSI JL, 1995, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY HUM [Anonymous], 2014, POLYMERIC CRYOGELS, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05846-7_1 Bailenson JN, 2008, J LEARN SCI, V17, P102, DOI 10.1080/10508400701793141 Banos RM, 2012, INTERACT COMPUT, V24, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.002 Banos RM, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P734, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.734 Banos RM, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P1, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9936 Bartle RA., 2007, TECHNE RES PHILOS TE, V10, P39, DOI [10.5840/TECHNE200710311, DOI 10.5840/TECHNE200710311] Bastiaansen M, 2018, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V7, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.09.003 Beck J, 2019, TOUR REV, V74, P586, DOI 10.1108/TR-03-2017-0049 Bogicevic V, 2019, TOURISM MANAGE, V74, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.02.009 Boland M., 2017, DO CONSUMERS REALLY BRADLEY MM, 1994, J BEHAV THER EXP PSY, V25, P49, DOI 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 Busselle R, 2008, COMMUN THEOR, V18, P255, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x Bystrom KE, 1999, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V8, P241, DOI 10.1162/105474699566107 CHEONG R, 1995, TOURISM MANAGE, V16, P417, DOI 10.1016/0261-5177(95)00049-T Chertoff DB, 2008, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V17, P405, DOI 10.1162/pres.17.4.405 Cho Y.-H., 2002, J TRAVEL TOUR MARK, V12, P1, DOI https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v12n04_01 Choi J, 2016, J TRAVEL TOUR MARK, V33, P46, DOI 10.1080/10548408.2015.1024913 CLIA, 2017, 2018 STAT CRUIS IND Deale CS, 2013, J HOSP LEIS SPORT TO, V13, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.jhlste.2013.09.002 Dieck MCT, 2018, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V21, P154, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2015.1070801 Disztinger P., 2017, INFORM COMMUNICATION, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51168-9_19 Draper JV, 1998, HUM FACTORS, V40, P354, DOI 10.1518/001872098779591386 Dueholm J, 2014, J HERIT TOUR, V9, P285, DOI 10.1080/1743873X.2014.905582 Flavian C, 2019, J BUS RES, V100, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.050 Flavian C, 2019, J TRAVEL TOUR MARK, V36, P847, DOI 10.1080/10548408.2019.1618781 Gavgani AM, 2018, J APPL PHYSIOL, V125, P1670, DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00338.2018 Goossens G, 2000, ANN TOURISM RES, V27, P301, DOI 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00067-5 Gorini A, 2010, ANN GEN PSYCHIATR, V9, DOI 10.1186/1744-859X-9-30 Griffin T., 2017, VIRTUAL REALITY IMPL Guttentag DA, 2010, TOURISM MANAGE, V31, P637, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.003 Hahm J, 2011, J TRAVEL TOUR MARK, V28, P165, DOI 10.1080/10548408.2011.546209 Han H, 2014, ASIA PAC J TOUR RES, V19, P428, DOI 10.1080/10941665.2013.764333 Hazlett RL, 1999, J ADVERTISING RES, V39, P7 Hosany S, 2013, J BUS RES, V66, P730, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.011 Hosany S, 2012, J BUS RES, V65, P685, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.015 Huang YC, 2016, INT J TOUR RES, V18, P116, DOI 10.1002/jtr.2038 Huang YC, 2013, J HOSP LEIS SPORT TO, V13, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.jhlste.2013.09.007 Hur HJ, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V73, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.051 Hyun MY, 2012, J BUS RES, V65, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.011 Jung Timothy, 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), P208, DOI 10.1109/ICCE.2017.7889287 Labovitz J, 2020, CLIN PODIATR MED SUR, V37, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.cpm.2019.12.008 Lang P. J., 1997, INT AFFECTIVE PICTUR Le TH, 2018, INT J HOSP MANAG, V69, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.09.016 Lepouras G., 2005, VIRTUAL REAL-LONDON, V8, P96, DOI [10.1007/s10055-004-0141-1, DOI 10.1007/S10055-004-0141-1] Lessiter J, 2001, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V10, P282, DOI 10.1162/105474601300343612 Li HR, 2002, J ADVERTISING, V31, P43, DOI 10.1080/00913367.2002.10673675 Li SS, 2018, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V21, P1761, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2016.1223023 Lim CP, 2006, BRIT J EDUC TECHNOL, V37, P211, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00531.x Lombard M., 1997, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1083-6101.1997.TB00072.X Loureiro Krassmann Aliane, 2020, Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Industrial and Everyday Life Applications. 12th International Conference, VAMR 2020 Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 12191), P270, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-49698-2_18 Mandryk RL, 2006, BEHAV INFORM TECHNOL, V25, P141, DOI 10.1080/01449290500331156 Marasco A, 2018, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V9, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.12.002 Marchiori E, 2018, INF TECHNOL TOUR, V18, P133, DOI 10.1007/s40558-018-0104-0 Meehan M, 2005, APPL PSYCHOPHYS BIOF, V30, P239, DOI 10.1007/s10484-005-6381-3 Nash EB, 2000, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V12, P1, DOI 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1201_1 Nicovich S., 2017, PRESENCE SENSE PLACE North MM, 2016, AUSTRALAS J INF SYST, V20 Nunez D., 2001, Proceedings AFRIGRAPH 2001. 1st International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality and Visualisation, P115, DOI 10.1145/513867.513892 Pallavicini F, 2018, PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AUG, V27, P183, DOI 10.1162/PRES_a_00325 Pantano E, 2011, J HOSP TOUR TECHNOL, V2, P50, DOI 10.1108/17579881111112412 Pearlman DM, 2010, J CONV EVENT TOUR, V11, P247, DOI 10.1080/15470148.2010.530535 Piccione J, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02583 Prayag G, 2017, J TRAVEL RES, V56, P41, DOI 10.1177/0047287515620567 Prayag G, 2013, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V2, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2013.05.001 Rainoldi M., 2018, GAZE J TOURISM HOSPI, V9, P53 Riva G, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P45, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9993 Riva G, 2016, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00164 RUSSELL JA, 1980, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V39, P1161, DOI 10.1037/h0077714 Sas C, 2003, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V12, P523, DOI 10.1162/105474603322761315 Schubert TW, 2009, COMMUN THEOR, V19, P161, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01340.x Schuemie MJ, 2001, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V4, P183, DOI 10.1089/109493101300117884 Schultze U, 2010, J INF TECHNOL, V25, P434, DOI 10.1057/jit.2010.25 Shafer DM, 2014, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V23, P267, DOI 10.1162/PRES_a_00193 Sheridan T. B., 1992, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V1, P120, DOI [DOI 10.1162/PRES.1992.1.1.120, 10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.120] Siriaraya P, 2014, 32ND ANNUAL ACM CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2014), P3977, DOI 10.1145/2556288.2557035 Slater M, 1999, IEEE COMPUT GRAPH, V19, P6, DOI 10.1109/38.749116 Slater M, 1999, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V8, P560, DOI 10.1162/105474699566477 Slater M., 1994, PRESENCE TELEOPERATO, V3, P130, DOI 10.1162/pres.1994.3.2.130 Statista, 2016, GLOB VIRT REAL MARK STEUER J, 1992, J COMMUN, V42, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x Stevens J.A., 2015, OPEN J MODELLING SIM, V3, P41, DOI [10.4236/ojmsi.2015.32005, DOI 10.4236/OJMSI.2015.32005] Sun HM, 2015, APPL ERGON, V50, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.03.006 Tussyadiah I. P., 2016, TOURISM TRAVEL RES A, V25 Tussyadiah IP, 2018, TOURISM MANAGE, V66, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.003 van Berlo ZMC., 2020, AUGMENTED REALITY VI, P11, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-37869-1_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-37869-1_2] van Wijk J, 1998, P PRES SHAR VIRT ENV Villani D, 2012, INTERACT COMPUT, V24, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.008 Vora J, 2002, APPL ERGON, V33, P559, DOI 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00039-X Walters G, 2012, J HOSP TOUR RES, V36, P366, DOI 10.1177/1096348010390815 Wei W, 2019, J HOSP TOUR TECHNOL, V10, P539, DOI 10.1108/JHTT-04-2018-0030 WILLIAMS P, 1995, TOURISM MANAGE, V16, P423, DOI 10.1016/0261-5177(95)00050-X Witmer BG, 1998, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V7, P225, DOI 10.1162/105474698565686 Yung R, 2021, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V24, P1505, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2020.1820454 Yung R, 2019, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V22, P2056, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2017.1417359 Zeltzer D., 1992, AUTONOMY INTERACTION, V1, P127, DOI DOI 10.1162/PRES.1992.1.1.127 NR 97 TC 34 Z9 34 PU ELSEVIER PI AMSTERDAM PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS PD MAR PY 2021 VL 46 BP 160 EP 171 DI 10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.11.009 WC Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism; Management SC Social Sciences - Other Topics; Business & Economics ER PT J AU Kushlev, K Dwyer, R Dunne, EW AF Kushlev, Kostadin Dwyer, Ryan Dunne, Elizabeth W. TI The Social Price of Constant Connectivity: Smartphones Impose Subtle Costs on Well-Being SO CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE LA English DT Article DE subjective well-being; social interactions; smartphones; cyberpsychology; mobile computing AB Smartphones provide people with a variety of benefits, but they may also impose subtle social costs. We propose that being constantly connected undercuts the emotional benefits of face-to-face social interactions in two ways. First, smartphone use may diminish the emotional benefits of ongoing social interactions by preventing us from giving our full attention to friends and family in our immediate social environment. Second, smartphones may lead people to miss out on the emotional benefits of casual social interactions by supplanting such interactions altogether. Across field experiments and experience-sampling studies, we find that smartphones consistently interfere with the emotional benefits people could otherwise reap from their broader social environment. We also find that the costs of smartphone use are fairly subtle, contrary to proclamations in the popular press that smartphones are ruining our social lives. By highlighting how smartphones affect the benefits we derive from our broader social environment, this work provides a foundation for building theory and research on the consequences of mobile technology for human well-being. C1 [Kushlev, Kostadin] Georgetown Univ, Dept Psychol, 302C White Gravenor Hall,37th & O St NW, Washington, DC 20057 USA. [Dwyer, Ryan; Dunne, Elizabeth W.] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychol, Vancouver, BC, Canada. C3 Georgetown University; University of British Columbia RP Kushlev, K (corresponding author), Georgetown Univ, Dept Psychol, 302C White Gravenor Hall,37th & O St NW, Washington, DC 20057 USA. EM kk1199@georgetown.edu CR ABELSON RP, 1985, PSYCHOL BULL, V97, P129, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129 [Anonymous], 2015, US SMARTPHONE USE 20 BAUMEISTER RF, 1995, PSYCHOL BULL, V117, P497, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 Chen Q, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V54, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.047 Diener E, 2017, CAN PSYCHOL, V58, P87, DOI 10.1037/cap0000063 Dwyer RJ, 2018, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V78, P233, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.007 Epley N, 2014, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V143, P1980, DOI 10.1037/a0037323 Fitch GM, 2015, TRAFFIC INJ PREV, V16, P124, DOI 10.1080/15389588.2014.923566 Hunter JF, 2018, PSYCHOSOM MED, V80, P345, DOI 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000568 IDC, 2018, NEW WEAR FOR IDC SHO Kushlev K, 2019, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V91, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.023 Kushlev K, 2019, J SOC PERS RELAT, V36, P1619, DOI 10.1177/0265407518769387 Kushlev K, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V76, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.001 Kushlev K, 2016, 34TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, CHI 2016, P1011, DOI 10.1145/2858036.2858359 Nelson SK, 2014, PSYCHOL BULL, V140, P846, DOI 10.1037/a0035444 Pew Research Center,, 2018, MOB FACT SHEET Sandstrom GM, 2014, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V5, P437, DOI 10.1177/1948550613502990 Savage M., 2018, 1000 SWEDES ARE INSE Spencer SJ, 2005, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V89, P845, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845 Verduyn P, 2017, SOC ISS POLICY REV, V11, P274, DOI 10.1111/sipr.12033 NR 20 TC 26 Z9 26 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC PI THOUSAND OAKS PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA PD AUG PY 2019 VL 28 IS 4 BP 347 EP 352 DI 10.1177/0963721419847200 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Rosenbusch, H Evans, AM Zeelenberg, M AF Rosenbusch, Hannes Evans, Anthony M. Zeelenberg, Marcel TI Multilevel Emotion Transfer on YouTube: Disentangling the Effects of Emotional Contagion and Homophily on Video Audiences SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE LA English DT Article DE emotion transfer; multilevel analysis; Internet; cyberpsychology; contagion; homophily ID SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; MODELS; FACES AB Why do connected users in online social networks express similar emotions? Past approaches have suggested situational emotion transfers (i.e., contagion) and the phenomenon that emotionally similar users flock together (i.e., homophily). We analyze these mechanisms in unison by exploiting the hierarchical structure of YouTube through multilevel analyses, disaggregating the video- and channel-level effects of YouTuber emotions on audience comments. Dictionary analyses using the National Research Council emotion lexica were used to measure the emotions expressed in videos and user comments from 2,083 YouTube vlogs selected from 110 vloggers. We find that video- and channel-level emotions independently influence audience emotions, providing evidence for both contagion and homophily effects. Random slope models suggest that contagion strength varies between YouTube channels for some emotions. However, neither average channel-level emotions nor number of subscribers significantly moderate the strength of contagion effects. The present study highlights that multiple, independent mechanisms shape emotions in online social networks. C1 [Rosenbusch, Hannes; Evans, Anthony M.; Zeelenberg, Marcel] Tilburg Univ, Dept Social Psychol, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands. [Zeelenberg, Marcel] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Mkt, Amsterdam, Netherlands. C3 Tilburg University; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam RP Rosenbusch, H (corresponding author), Tilburg Univ, Dept Social Psychol, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands. EM h.rosenbusch@uvt.nl CR Alloway T., 2014, SOCIAL NETWORKING, V3, P150, DOI DOI 10.4236/SN.2014.33020 Anderson C, 2003, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V84, P1054, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054 Bazarova NN, 2015, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CSCW'15), P154, DOI 10.1145/2675133.2675297 Bollen J, 2011, ARTIF LIFE, V17, P237, DOI 10.1162/artl_a_00034 Cherulnik PD, 2001, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V31, P2149, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00167.x Coviello L, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0090315 Delvaux E, 2016, COGNITION EMOTION, V30, P101, DOI 10.1080/02699931.2015.1018143 Enders CK, 2007, PSYCHOL METHODS, V12, P121, DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121 Ferrara E, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0142390 Guadagno RE, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P2312, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.016 Himelboim I, 2016, NEW MEDIA SOC, V18, P1382, DOI 10.1177/1461444814555096 Joormann J, 2007, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V116, P80, DOI 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.80 Kiritchenko S, 2014, J ARTIF INTELL RES, V50, P723, DOI 10.1613/jair.4272 Korkontzelos I, 2016, J BIOMED INFORM, V62, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.06.007 Kramer ADI, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P8788, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1320040111 Lewis K, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P68, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1109739109 Oksanen A, 2015, J MED INTERNET RES, V17, DOI 10.2196/jmir.5007 Preston SD, 2002, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V25, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X02000018 Ritter RS, 2014, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V5, P243, DOI 10.1177/1948550613492345 Rosas VP, 2013, IEEE INTELL SYST, V28, P38, DOI 10.1109/MIS.2013.9 Royal Society for Public Health, 2017, STATUSOFMIND SOCIAL Salganik M., 2017, BIT BIT SOCIAL RES D Sylwester K, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0137422 Wild B, 2001, PSYCHIAT RES, V102, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0165-1781(01)00225-6 Wimmer A, 2010, AM J SOCIOL, V116, P583, DOI 10.1086/653658 Wispe L., 1987, EMPATHY ITS DEV, P17 Wollmer M, 2013, IEEE INTELL SYST, V28, P46, DOI 10.1109/MIS.2013.34 Youyou Wu, 2017, Psychol Sci, V28, P276, DOI 10.1177/0956797616678187 Yuan GC, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH ACM CONFERENCE ON RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS (RECSYS'14), P17, DOI 10.1145/2645710.2645734 Zhu J, 2017, IEICE T INF SYST, VE100D, P2515, DOI 10.1587/transinf.2016EDP7473 NR 30 TC 26 Z9 26 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC PI THOUSAND OAKS PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA PD NOV PY 2019 VL 10 IS 8 BP 1028 EP 1035 DI 10.1177/1948550618820309 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Donard, V AF Donard, V. CA Equipe Rech Cyberpsychologie TI Identity and relational stakes in MMORPG SO PRATIQUES PSYCHOLOGIQUES LA French DT Article DE MMORPG; Psychoanalyse; Social psychology; Relation; Identity construction; Avatar; In-group; Out-group; Social identity; Cyberpsychology ID GAMES AB A MMORPG is an online role-playing game, which is susceptible to simultaneously gather several thousands of Internet users. It derives from the traditional role-playing games, of which it preserves numerous characteristics, such as the possibility to embody a character that can evolve. However, it differs from other types of video games by the social experience it provides to its user. Centred on the relational dimension of the MMORPG, this article draws on two different approaches. On one hand, psychodynamic theories will allow us to target its unconscious stakes (such as the immersion in a virtual world, or the identification to one's avatar), and on the other hand, social psychology will help us explore the relational and socialising dimension (groups, discrimination and social identity). This article therefore testifies of a series of interactions existing between the player's identity construction and his relation to the group. (C) 2011 Societe francaise de psychologie. Publie par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves. RP Donard, V (corresponding author), 39 Ave Franklin Roosevelt, F-75008 Paris, France. CR Autin F., THEORIE IDENTITE SOC Ceranoglu TA, 2010, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V14, P141, DOI 10.1037/a0019439 Chen CH, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P293, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.0066 Genvo S., 2009, JEU SON ERE NUMERIQU Lacan J., 1966, STADE MIROIR COMME F Laplanche J., 2004, VOCABULAIRE PSYCHANA, V4 Stora M., 2005, GUERIR VIRTUEL NOUVE Tajfel H., 1979, SOCIAL PSYCHOL INTER, P33 Tisseron S., 2006, ENFANT RISQUE VIRTUE Tisseron S, 2009, ADOLESCENCES, V69 Turner J.C., 1986, PSYCHOL INTERGROUP R, V5, P7, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203505984-16 Virole B, 2003, BON USAGE JEUX VIDEO Virole B., 2010, CYBERPSYCHOLOGIE Winnicott D.W, 1966, CONVERSATIONS ORDINA, P143 Winnicott D. W., 1951, JEUX REALITE, P7 Winnicott D.W., 1971, JEUX REALITE, P153 Yee N, 2006, PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AUG, V15, P309, DOI 10.1162/pres.15.3.309 Young KS, 1997, WHAT MAKES INTERNET NR 18 TC 0 Z9 0 PU ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER PI PARIS PA 23 RUE LINOIS, 75724 PARIS, FRANCE PD MAR PY 2012 VL 18 IS 1 BP 23 EP 36 DI 10.1016/j.prps.2011.04.002 WC Psychology; Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Weinstein, N Przybylski, AK Murayama, K AF Weinstein, Netta Przybylski, Andrew K. Murayama, Kou TI A prospective study of the motivational and health dynamics of Internet Gaming Disorder SO PEERJ LA English DT Article DE Self-regulation; Internet/cyberpsychology; Self-determination theory; Well-being; Internet gaming; Internet gaming disorder ID SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; COMPUTER GAME USE; NEED-SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; SCREEN TIME; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS; INTERPERSONAL CONTROL; SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS; DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS AB A prospective study of the motivational and health dynamics of Internet Gaming Disorder. The American Psychiatric Association has identified Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) as a potential psychiatric condition and called for research to investigate its etiology, stability, and impacts on health and behavior. The present study recruited 5,777 American adults and applied self-determination theory to examine how motivational factors influence, and are influenced by, IGD and health across a six month period. Following a preregistered analysis plan, results confirmed our hypotheses that IGD criteria are moderately stable and that they and basic psychological need satisfaction have a reciprocal relationship over time. Results also showed need satisfaction promoted health and served as a protective factor against IGD. Contrary to what was hypothesized, results provided no evidence directly linking IGD to health over time. Exploratory analyses suggested that IGD may have indirect effects on health by way of its impact on basic needs. Implications are discussed in terms of existing gaming addiction and motivational frameworks. C1 [Weinstein, Netta] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales. [Przybylski, Andrew K.] Univ Oxford, Oxford Internet Inst, Oxford, England. [Przybylski, Andrew K.] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford, England. [Murayama, Kou] Univ Reading, Sch Psychol & Clin Language Sci, Reading, Berks, England. [Murayama, Kou] Kochi Univ Technol, Kami, Japan. C3 RLUK- Research Libraries UK; Cardiff University; RLUK- Research Libraries UK; University of Oxford; RLUK- Research Libraries UK; University of Oxford; RLUK- Research Libraries UK; University of Reading; Kochi University Technology RP Weinstein, N (corresponding author), Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales. EM weinsteinn@cardiff.ac.uk FU John Fell Fund Grant through the University of Oxford [CZD08320] FX This research was funded by a John Fell Fund Grant (CZD08320) through the University of Oxford. There was no additional external funding received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. CR Aarseth E, 2017, J BEHAV ADDICT, V6, P267, DOI 10.1556/2006.5.2016.088 Ahmad F, 2014, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V14, DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-398 American Psychological Association, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU Anderson SE, 2008, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-8-366 [Anonymous], 2017, PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN [Anonymous], 2017, YOUGOV PRIV POL [Anonymous], 2017, TERMS COND COMB [Anonymous], 2009, INTEREST TAKING CARR [Anonymous], 2016, REGISTRATION FORK PR Baranowski T, 2008, AM J PREV MED, V34, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.027 Bartholomew KJ, 2011, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V37, P1459, DOI 10.1177/0146167211413125 Bishop Alex J, 2011, J Aging Res, V2011, P953031, DOI 10.4061/2011/953031 Boone JE, 2007, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V4, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-4-26 Brenning KM, 2012, PERS RELATIONSHIP, V19, P445, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01372.x CAMPBELL DT, 1959, PSYCHOL BULL, V56, P81, DOI 10.1037/h0046016 Chalmers RP, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V48, P1 Charlton JP, 2007, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V23, P1531, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.002 Charlton JP, 2002, BRIT J PSYCHOL, V93, P329, DOI 10.1348/000712602760146242 Chen BW, 2015, MOTIV EMOTION, V39, P216, DOI 10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1 CLANCY K, 1974, AM J SOCIOL, V80, P205, DOI 10.1086/225767 Clarke A, 2011, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-487 Cohen J, 2003, APPL MULTIPLE CORREL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203774441 COHEN S, 1983, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V13, P99, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb02325.x Compas BE, 2001, PSYCHOL BULL, V127, P87, DOI 10.1037//0033-2909.127.1.87 Cranwell J, 2016, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V70, P488, DOI 10.1136/jech-2015-206402 CRONBACH LJ, 1955, PSYCHOL BULL, V52, P281, DOI 10.1037/h0040957 Cumming G., 2013, UNDERSTANDING NEW ST Deci EL, 2000, PSYCHOL INQ, V11, P227, DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 Deci EL, 2001, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V27, P930, DOI 10.1177/0146167201278002 Desai RA, 2010, PEDIATRICS, V126, pE1414, DOI 10.1542/peds.2009-2706 Duggan, 2015, GAMING AND GAMERS Duggan M., 2015, WHO PLAYS VIDEO GAME Faulkner G, 2015, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V13, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11469-014-9501-6 Ferguson CJ, 2011, J PSYCHIATR RES, V45, P1573, DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.09.005 Festl R, 2013, ADDICTION, V108, P592, DOI 10.1111/add.12016 Finkel S. E., 1995, CAUSAL ANAL PANEL DA Forest J, 2011, CAN J ADM SCI, V28, P27, DOI 10.1002/CJAS.170 Garnefski N, 2002, J ADOLESCENCE, V25, P603, DOI 10.1006/jado.2002.0507 Gentile DA, 2011, PEDIATRICS, V127, pE319, DOI 10.1542/peds.2010-1353 Granic I, 2014, AM PSYCHOL, V69, P66, DOI 10.1037/a0034857 Griffiths MD, 2016, ADDICTION, V111, P167, DOI 10.1111/add.13057 Hasin DS, 2013, AM J PSYCHIAT, V170, P834, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060782 Hodgins DC, 2005, J GAMBL STUD, V21, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10899-004-1917-7 Hodgins HS, 1996, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V22, P227, DOI 10.1177/0146167296223001 Hofferth SL, 2012, J RES ADOLESCENCE, V22, P215, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00770.x HOUSE JS, 1988, SCIENCE, V241, P540, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676 Ioannidis JPA, 2012, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V7, P645, DOI 10.1177/1745691612464056 Jelicic H, 2009, DEV PSYCHOL, V45, P1195, DOI 10.1037/a0015665 Kardefelt-Winther D, 2014, ADDICTION, V109, P1568, DOI 10.1111/add.12645 Kardefelt-Winther D, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V31, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059 King DL, 2013, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V33, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.002 Kraut R, 1998, AM PSYCHOL, V53, P1017, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017 Kremer P, 2014, J SCI MED SPORT, V17, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.03.012 La Guardia JG, 2000, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V79, P367, DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.367 Lafreniere MAK, 2012, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V53, P827, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.013 Lagana L, 2011, BMC GERIATR, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-11-60 Lalande D, 2017, J PERS, V85, P163, DOI 10.1111/jopy.12229 Lanningham-Foster L, 2006, PEDIATRICS, V118, pE1831, DOI 10.1542/peds.2006-1087 Legate N, 2013, PSYCHOL SCI, V24, P583, DOI 10.1177/0956797612457951 Lenhart A., 2015, TEENS TECHNOLOGY FRI Little TD, 2007, INT J BEHAV DEV, V31, P357, DOI 10.1177/0165025407077757 Luyten P, 2013, AM PSYCHOL, V68, P172, DOI 10.1037/a0032243 Marsh HW, 2016, DEV PSYCHOL, V52, P1273, DOI 10.1037/dev0000146 Mellor D, 2008, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V45, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.020 Menard S, 2002, LONGITUDINAL RES Meng ZQ, 2014, J PSYCHIATR RES, V54, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.007 Mentzoni RA, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P591, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0260 Milton K, 2011, BRIT J SPORT MED, V45, P203, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.068395 Moller AC, 2010, GROUP PROCESS INTERG, V13, P41, DOI 10.1177/1368430209350318 Morey RD, 2016, ROY SOC OPEN SCI, V3, DOI 10.1098/rsos.150547 MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America), 2015, THEATR MARK STAT 201 Murphy P, 2000, AM J PSYCHIAT, V157, P1156, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.7.1156 NEUMAN SB, 1988, READ RES QUART, V23, P414, DOI 10.2307/747641 Newzoo, 2016, NEWZOO Ng BD, 2005, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V8, P110, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.110 Ng JYY, 2012, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V7, P325, DOI 10.1177/1745691612447309 Nguyen-Rodriguez Selena T, 2009, Eat Disord, V17, P211, DOI 10.1080/10640260902848543 Niemiec CP, 2009, J RES PERS, V43, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.001 Parkes A, 2013, ARCH DIS CHILD, V98, P341, DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301508 Patrick H, 2007, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V92, P434, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434 Peters CS, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P480, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.0140 Petry NM, 2014, ADDICTION, V109, P1399, DOI 10.1111/add.12457 Pontes HM, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0110137 Przybylski AK, 2017, AM J PSYCHIAT, V174, P230, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16020224 Przybylski AK, 2016, PEERJ, V4, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2401 Przybylski AK, 2014, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V106, P441, DOI 10.1037/a0034820 Przybylski AK, 2010, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V14, P154, DOI 10.1037/a0019440 Przybylski AK, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P485, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2009.0083 Reeves S, 2013, APPETITE, V60, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.024 Reinboth M, 2004, MOTIV EMOTION, V28, P297, DOI 10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040156.81924.b8 Roth G, 2012, J ADOLESCENCE, V35, P799, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.11.005 Roth G, 2009, DEV PSYCHOL, V45, P1119, DOI 10.1037/a0015272 Ryan RM, 2005, DEV PSYCHOPATHOL, V17, P987, DOI 10.1017/S0954579405050467 Ryan RM, 2017, SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY: BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS IN MOTIVATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND WELLNESS, P1, DOI 10.1521/978.14625/28806 Ryan RM, 2001, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V52, P141, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 Ryan RM, 2000, AM PSYCHOL, V55, P68, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Saitz R, 2008, J ADDICT MED, V2, P55, DOI 10.1097/ADM.0b013e318166af74 Salkovskis PM, 2002, PSYCHOL MED, V32, P843, DOI 10.1017/S0033291702005822 Scharkow M, 2014, ADDICTION, V109, P1910, DOI 10.1111/add.12662 Seeman TE, 1996, ANN EPIDEMIOL, V6, P442, DOI 10.1016/S1047-2797(96)00095-6 Sheldon KM, 2011, PSYCHOL POP MEDIA CU, V1, P2, DOI 10.1037/2160-4134.1.S.2 Sheldon KM, 1996, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V22, P1270, DOI 10.1177/01461672962212007 Shen Y, 2016, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V80, pE13, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.02.006 SHERBOURNE CD, 1991, SOC SCI MED, V32, P705, DOI 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B Sisson SB, 2010, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V47, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.02.016 Slutske WS, 2003, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V112, P263, DOI 10.1037/0021-843X.112.2.263 Soenens B, 2012, J ADOLESCENCE, V35, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.05.001 Steel Z, 1998, ADDICTION, V93, P895, DOI 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.93689511.x Talley A, 2010, PSYCHOL HEALTH, V25, P433, DOI 10.1080/08870440802582682 Terraneo A, 2016, EUR NEUROPSYCHOPHARM, V26, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.11.011 Thompson CA, 2006, J OCCUP HEALTH PSYCH, V11, P100, DOI 10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.100 Valkenburg PM, 2009, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V18, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x Van den Broeck A, 2008, WORK STRESS, V22, P277, DOI 10.1080/02678370802393672 Verstuyf J, 2012, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V9, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-21 Wagenmakers EJ, 2012, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V7, P632, DOI 10.1177/1745691612463078 WARE JE, 1992, MED CARE, V30, P473, DOI 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 Wei MF, 2005, J COUNS PSYCHOL, V52, P591, DOI 10.1037/0022-0167.52.4.591 Weinstein N, 2011, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V100, P1043, DOI 10.1037/a0022495 Weinstein N, 2010, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V98, P222, DOI 10.1037/a0016984 Weiss RD, 1998, AM J PSYCHIAT, V155, P127, DOI 10.1176/ajp.155.1.127 WHEELER L, 1991, J PERS, V59, P339, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00252.x Widyanto L, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P443, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.443 Williams GC, 2000, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V30, P1756, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02466.x Wilson PM, 2003, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V33, P2373, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01890.x NR 124 TC 36 Z9 36 PU PEERJ INC PI LONDON PA 341-345 OLD ST, THIRD FLR, LONDON, EC1V 9LL, ENGLAND PD SEP 29 PY 2017 VL 5 AR e3838 DI 10.7717/peerj.3838 WC Multidisciplinary Sciences SC Science & Technology - Other Topics ER PT J AU Gilbert, RL Murphy, NA Krueger, AB Ludwig, AR Efron, TY AF Gilbert, Richard L. Murphy, Nora A. Krueger, Alice B. Ludwig, Ann R. Efron, Torri Y. TI Psychological Benefits of Participation in Three-dimensional Virtual Worlds for Individuals with Real-world Disabilities SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISABILITY DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION LA English DT Article DE cyberpsychology; developmental disabilities; disabilities; learning disabilities; mental disabilities; physical disabilities; Second Life; virtual worlds ID REHABILITATION; ENVIRONMENT; SUPPORT; PEOPLE; SCALE AB One hundred and ninety-six individuals with real-world disabilities were administered a battery of psychological adjustment measures soon after joining the three-dimensional virtual world of Second Life((R)). After three months, 61 participants who continued to be actively involved in Second Life were re-administered the adjustment measures and completed a survey about their virtual and real-life experiences during the interval between assessments. Participants' scores significantly improved on measures of affective states (depression, anxiety, positive emotion, life satisfaction, and feelings of loneliness) and self-evaluation (self-esteem). An index of overall change was associated with the number of virtual friends and group affiliations in Second Life, as well as feelings about the self as a result of involvement in the virtual world. The current study provides initial empirical support that three-dimensional virtual worlds can serve as a psychologically beneficial context for individuals with real-life disabilities. C1 [Gilbert, Richard L.; Murphy, Nora A.; Efron, Torri Y.] Loyola Marymount Univ, Dept Psychol, PRSOE Project, Los Angeles, CA 90045 USA. [Krueger, Alice B.; Ludwig, Ann R.] Virtual Abil Inc, Aurora, CO USA. C3 Loyola Marymount University RP Gilbert, RL (corresponding author), Loyola Marymount Univ, Dept Psychol, PRSOE Project, Los Angeles, CA 90045 USA. EM richard.gilbert@lmu.edu CR Alm N, 1998, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P1174, DOI 10.1109/ICSMC.1998.727865 Au W. J., 2008, MAKING 2 LIFE NOTES Biever C, 2007, NEW SCI, V194, P26 Christiansen C, 1998, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V79, P888, DOI 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90083-1 DAHLEM NW, 1991, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V47, P756, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(199111)47:6<756::AID-JCLP2270470605>3.0.CO;2-L DIENER E, 1985, J PERS ASSESS, V49, P71, DOI 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 Disabled World, WORLD FACTS STAT DIS Driver E., 2008, THINK BALM IMMERSIVE, V1 Gilbert R. L., J IMMERSIVE IN PRESS Gilbert RL, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P585, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0468 Gilbert RL, 2011, PSYCHOL SEX, V2, P107, DOI 10.1080/19419899.2010.536987 Guest Tim, 2008, 2 LIVES JOURNEY VIRT KZero, 2011, VIRT WORLDS IND DAT Lee RM, 2001, J COUNS PSYCHOL, V48, P310 [柳菁 Liu Jing], 2008, [心理科学, Psychological Science], V31, P762 Merians AS, 2006, NEUROREHAB NEURAL RE, V20, P252, DOI 10.1177/1545968306286914 Nino T., 2007, PEERING INSIDE 2 LIF Parsons S, 2002, J INTELL DISABIL RES, V46, P430, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00425.x Pugnetti L., 1998, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY AMP, V1, P151, DOI [10.1089/cpb.1998.1.151, DOI 10.1089/CPB.1998.1.151] RADLOFF L S, 1977, Applied Psychological Measurement, V1, P385, DOI 10.1177/014662167700100306 REGIER DA, 1984, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V41, P934 Rizzo A., 2009, POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS, P375, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-329-9_18 Rose FD, 2005, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V8, P241, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.241 Rosenberg M., 1965, SOC ADOLESCENT SELF Russell DW, 1996, J PERS ASSESS, V66, P20, DOI 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2 ShockProof, 2005, SHOCKPROOF WHAT IS I Snider L, 2010, DEV NEUROREHABIL, V13, P120, DOI 10.3109/17518420903357753 Spielberger CD, 1989, STATE TRAIT ANXIETY Thompson D, 2010, J REHABIL RES DEV, V47, pVII, DOI 10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0071 Thornton M, 2005, BRAIN INJURY, V19, P989, DOI 10.1080/02699050500109944 Tortella-Feliu M, 2011, BEHAV MODIF, V35, P3, DOI 10.1177/0145445510390801 WATSON D, 1988, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V54, P1063, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 Wiederhold B. K., 2005, VIRTUAL REALITY THER, P125, DOI DOI 10.1037/10858-011 NR 33 TC 11 Z9 11 PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD PI ABINGDON PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND PD SEP 1 PY 2013 VL 60 IS 3 BP 208 EP 224 DI 10.1080/1034912X.2013.812189 WC Education, Special; Rehabilitation SC Education & Educational Research; Rehabilitation ER PT J AU Stojnic, T Vatsalan, D Arachchilage, NAG AF Stojnic, Tatyana Vatsalan, Dinusha Arachchilage, Nalin A. G. TI Phishing email strategies: Understanding cybercriminals' strategies of crafting phishing emails SO SECURITY AND PRIVACY LA English DT Article DE cyberpsychology; identity theft; machine learning; phishing; usable security ID FEAR APPEALS; AVOIDANCE; THREATS AB It is a known fact that cybercriminals often manipulate people to steal sensitive information. However, there has been a lack of research in investigating cybercriminals' strategies and the evolution of strategies when crafting phishing emails to entice people to perform a variety of malicious tasks such as clicking on fraudulent links. This study uses a combination of Natural Language Processing (NLP), topic modeling, and clustering techniques to analyze and evaluate the persuasive techniques/strategies, which cybercriminals use when crafting fraudulent emails. Our experimental results revealed the efficacy of using these techniques in understanding cybercriminals' mindset as well as how certain aspects of these techniques maintained consistency despite the evolution of the strategy from early Nigerian scams to more modern phishing emails. The findings of our study indicate that the most common technique/strategy used by cybercriminals is a combination of creating a sense of urgency while promising a reward. Moreover, despite the evolution of technology, cybercriminals are still effectively using the same persuasive techniques. Based on our findings, we provided several recommendations to improve anti-phishing software and awareness and training programs. C1 [Stojnic, Tatyana; Arachchilage, Nalin A. G.] La Trobe Univ, Sch Engn & Math Sci, Optus La Trobe Cyber Secur Res Hub, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. [Vatsalan, Dinusha; Arachchilage, Nalin A. G.] CSIROs Data61, Sydney, NSW, Australia. [Arachchilage, Nalin A. G.] Univ Auckland, Sch Comp Sci, Auckland, New Zealand. C3 La Trobe University; Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); University of Auckland RP Arachchilage, NAG (corresponding author), La Trobe Univ, Sch Engn & Math Sci, Optus La Trobe Cyber Secur Res Hub, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. EM nalin.arachchilage@gmail.com CR Adrien R., 2019, MASTER SECURITY NETW, V5 Alejandra D., 2019, CRYPTOLOGIA, V44, P1 Ana F., 2015, PRINCIPLES PERSUASIO, P36 Arachchilage NAG, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V60, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.065 Arachchilage NAG, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V38, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.046 Arachchilage NAG, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P706, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.018 Ayman EA., 2019, SPEARS SHIELDS ARE D, P15 Bitly, 2017, BITL URL SHORT LINK Blei DM, 2003, J MACH LEARN RES, V3, P993, DOI 10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993 Blythe M, 2011, 29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P3469 Boateng E. O. Y., 2014, J EMERGING TRENDS CO, V5, P297 Burns AJ, 2019, J ORG COMP ELECT COM, V29, P24, DOI 10.1080/10919392.2019.1552745 Centre Australia Cyber Security, 2017, THREAT REP Chawki M, 2009, J INFORM LAW TECHNOL, V1, P1 Chernyshev M, 2019, J MED SYST, V43, DOI 10.1007/s10916-018-1123-2 Dhamija R., 2006, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, DOI DOI 10.1145/1124772.1124861 Dinh S, 2015, DIGIT INVEST, V12, pS12, DOI 10.1016/j.diin.2015.01.006 Esteves Rui Maximo, 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom 2011), P565, DOI 10.1109/CloudCom.2011.86 FBI, 2019, BUS EM COMPR 26 BILL Ferreira A, 2019, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V125, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.12.004 Flory JD, 2006, J PSYCHIATR RES, V40, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.01.008 Gordon WJ, 2019, JAMA NETW OPEN, V2, DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0393 Gupta BB, 2018, TELECOMMUN SYST, V67, P247, DOI 10.1007/s11235-017-0334-z Hameed MA., 2016, 27 AUSTR C INF SYST, P12 Hoffman M., 2010, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR, P856, DOI DOI 10.5555/2997189.2997285 Jackson TW., 2007, J DATABASE MARK CUST, V15, p24 Jones HS, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0209684 Juan R., 2003, USING TF IDF DETERMI, P133 Katiana K., 2016, CBS NEWS Kirlappos I, 2012, IEEE SECUR PRIV, V10, P24, DOI 10.1109/MSP.2011.179 Kleitman S, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0205089 Kodinariya TM., 2013, INT J ADV RES COMPUT, V1, P90, DOI DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1087.2010.01995 Komiak SYX, 2006, MIS QUART, V30, P941 LEVENTHAL H, 1971, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH N, V61, P1208, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.61.6.1208 Liang HG, 2009, MIS QUART, V33, P71 Liddy ED, 2001, NATURAL LANGUAGE PRO, V2nd Lohani S., 2019, INT J ADV STUDIES SC, V4, P385 Marcus B., 2015, AUSTR C INF SYST ACI Maria RC., 2005, AUTOMATIC ASSIGNMENT, P380 Markus J., 2007, WHAT INSTILLS TRUST, P356 NA GamagedaraArachchilage., 2012, THESIS BRUENEL U UK Nicholson J, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF THIRTEENTH SYMPOSIUM ON USABLE PRIVACY AND SECURITY (SOUPS 2017), P285 Purkait Swapan, 2012, Information Management & Computer Security, V20, P382, DOI 10.1108/09685221211286548 Rakesh V., 2012, DETECTING PHISHING E, P824 Raphael S., 2017, APNEWS Rettie R., 2002, EMAIL MARKETING SUCC Rich T, 2018, SECUR J, V31, P208, DOI 10.1057/s41284-017-0095-0 ROGERS RW, 1975, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V32, P222, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.222 Sahingoz OK, 2019, EXPERT SYST APPL, V117, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.09.029 Sappleton N, 2016, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V19, P611, DOI 10.1080/13645579.2015.1078596 Shashidhar NK., 2015, US Paten, Patent No. [14/015,524, 14015524] Sheng S., 2007, P 3 S US PRIV SEC, P88, DOI DOI 10.1145/1280680.1280692 Smith A, 2009, CULT STUD, V23, P27, DOI 10.1080/09502380802016162 Susan H., 2006, ICIS 2006 P, P93 van der Maaten L, 2008, J MACH LEARN RES, V9, P2579 Vishwanath A, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V51, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2011.03.002 Wagstaff K., 2001, P 18 INT C MACH LEAR, V1, P577 Wainer J, 2011, 29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P3439 Wartena C, 2008, INT WORKSHOP DATABAS, P54, DOI 10.1109/DEXA.2008.120 Workman M, 2008, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V59, P662, DOI 10.1002/asi.20779 Yue Z., 2007, PHINDING PHISH EVALU NR 61 TC 4 Z9 4 PU WILEY PI HOBOKEN PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA PD SEP PY 2021 VL 4 IS 5 AR e165 DI 10.1002/spy2.165 WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Telecommunications SC Computer Science; Telecommunications ER PT J AU Ha, DN Linhl, DVR Thao, VTB Thang, NT Thuy, NT Luong, DH AF Do Ngoc Ha Dang Vu Ranh Linhl Vu Thi Bich Thao Nguyen The Thang Ngo Thanh Thuy Dinh-Hai Luong TI Bibliometric Research on Youth Entertainment Activities in Social Media between 2000 and 2021 from Scopus SO JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRIC RESEARCH LA English DT Article DE Online entertainments; Youth; Bibliometric analysis; Social well-being; COVID-19; Social interaction ID INTERNET ADDICTION; HABIT FORMATION; ONLINE; GENDER; GAMES; TELEVISION; PREVALENCE; ATTITUDES; EDUCATION; FACEBOOK AB The development of information communication and technology have changed the entertainment activities of Youth. This research elucidated the knowledge base of Youth Entertainment Activities in Social Media (YEASM) by applying the bibliometric methods for 531 Scopus articles from 2000 to 2021. The results showed the annual growth trend of publications over time, leading the United States. Small and emerging research groups, contributed to the YEASM related research community between 2017 and 2021. The sources were interested in four published themes, including Cyber behaviour and Cyberpsychology, Human-Computer interaction, Business studies, and Tourism studies. In addition, nine themes in YEASM were explored, of which the two most important topics were about virtual games and the well-being of young people. Besides that, two other concerned themes were gender & internet usage and adolescent enjoyment in social media. Moreover, ten topical topics were addressed, in which COVID-19 context was a new approach in several studies. Overall, this research could be valuable reference information for scientists in determining future research directions. C1 [Do Ngoc Ha; Dang Vu Ranh Linhl; Vu Thi Bich Thao] Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union, Youth Res Inst, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. [Nguyen The Thang; Ngo Thanh Thuy; Dinh-Hai Luong] Minist Educ & Training, Vietnam Natl Inst Educ Sci, Hanoi, Vietnam. RP Luong, DH (corresponding author), Minist Educ & Training, Vietnam Natl Inst Educ Sci, Hanoi, Vietnam. EM luongdinhhai@vnies.edu.vn CR Abram S, 2007, ASTR SOC P, V377, P161 Abuhamdeh S, 2012, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V38, P317, DOI 10.1177/0146167211427147 Al-Deen H.S.N., 2011, SOCIAL MEDIA USAGE I Al-maghrabi T, 2011, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V24, P85, DOI 10.1108/17410391111097447 Altarturi HHM, 2020, CHILD YOUTH SERV REV, V116, DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105134 [Anonymous], 2021, COVID DAT TRACK Muniz-Velazquez JA, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.566517 Mota FPB, 2020, COMPUT EDUC OPEN, V1, DOI 10.1016/j.caeo.2020.100015 Belch MA, 2005, J BUS RES, V58, P569, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.08.005 Blais JJ, 2008, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V37, P522, DOI 10.1007/s10964-007-9262-7 Boyle EA, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P771, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.020 Brockmann PE, 2016, SLEEP MED, V20, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.06.005 Callus P, 2017, CRIT AFR STUD, V9, P302, DOI [10.1080/21681392.2017.1371620, DOI 10.1080/21681392.2017.1371620] Can U, 2019, PHYSICA A, V535, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122372 Carlquist E, 2019, SUBJECTIVITY, V12, P228, DOI 10.1057/s41286-019-00074-9 Caspi A, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P54, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.54 Cho H, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V73, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.077 Cole H, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P575, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9988 Dauriat FZ, 2011, EUR ADDICT RES, V17, P185, DOI 10.1159/000326070 de Wit J, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586975 Dutta-Bergman MJ, 2004, HEALTH COMMUN, V16, P273, DOI 10.1207/S15327027HC1603_1 Galante J, 2016, APPL PSYCHOL-HLTH WE, V8, P322, DOI 10.1111/aphw.12074 Goh TT, 2019, BEHAV INFORM TECHNOL, V38, P273, DOI 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1529197 Graciyal DG, 2021, ASIA PAC MEDIA EDUC, V31, P99, DOI 10.1177/1326365X211003737 GROOS OV, 1969, J DOC, V25, P344, DOI 10.1108/eb026482 Hallinger P, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120358 Han B, 2018, J COMPUT INFORM SYST, V58, P122, DOI 10.1080/08874417.2016.1208064 Hansen T, 2009, EUR J MARKETING, V43, P1154, DOI 10.1108/03090560910976410 Harchekar JS., 2017, INT J ENG RES Pham HH, 2021, SCIENTOMETRICS, V126, P5201, DOI 10.1007/s11192-021-03965-4 Jackson S, 2012, CHILD YOUTH SERV REV, V34, P1107, DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.041 Jenner Marieke., 2018, NETFLIX RE INVENTION Kanekar A, 2020, HEALTHCARE-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/healthcare8030336 Kaplan AM, 2010, BUS HORIZONS, V53, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 Karaca A, 2021, CHILD YOUTH SERV REV, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106050 Khandeparkar K, 2021, J BUS RES, V128, P462, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.053 Klimmt C, 2017, PERMANENTLY ONLINE P Klimmt C, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P845, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9942 Lin H, 2007, DIGRA C Liszio S, 2019, ANN REV CYBERTHERAPY, V17, P65 Liu Q, 2018, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V43, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.005 Lopes RM, 2017, SCIENTOMETRICS, V111, P1591, DOI 10.1007/s11192-017-2294-1 Marti-Parreno J, 2016, J COMPUT ASSIST LEAR, V32, P663, DOI 10.1111/jcal.12161 Martinviita A, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V63, P672, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.089 Mustaro PN, P S BRAS LIA XI SBGA, P2 Nikken P, 2015, J CHILD FAM STUD, V24, P3423, DOI 10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4 Parker K, 2021, J MED INTERNET RES, V23, DOI 10.2196/23389 Cao QT, 2021, EUR J INVEST HEALTH, V11, P781, DOI 10.3390/ejihpe11030056 Raith L, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.698799 Rau PLP, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P396, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.396 Rohm AJ, 2012, J RES INTERACT MARK, V31 Saraiva J, 2018, J ADDICT NURS, V29, P13, DOI 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000209 Savela N, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10041392 Selcuk AA, 2019, TURK ARCH OTORHINOL, V57, P57, DOI 10.5152/tao.2019.4058 Selfie-Help PL, 2019, J POP CULT Shahibi M.S., 2017, INT J ACAD RES BUSIN, V7, P873 Shaw LH, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P517, DOI 10.1089/109493102321018150 Shen YM, 2021, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V279, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.054 Shivalingai D, 2008, COMP STUDY WEB 1 0 Silver C, 2020, TOP 25 EC WORLD Siste K, 2021, PSYCHIAT RES, V298, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113829 Smyth JM, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P717, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9963 Stehmann J, 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106219 Tosun LP, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P1510, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.018 Anh TTT, 2021, INT J EARLY CHILD SP, V13, P152, DOI 10.9756/INT-JECSE/V13I1.211018 Tsai CC, 2004, ADOLESCENCE, V39, P725 Udalagama T, 2014, SRI LANKA J SOC SCI, V35 Udomsap AD, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120073 United Nations, 2020, YOUTH COVID 19 UN University of Waterloo Working Group on Bibliometrics, 2016, CISC VIS NETW IND GL Unsworth N, 2015, PSYCHOL SCI, V26, P759, DOI 10.1177/0956797615570367 Uzuegbunam C., 2021, COMMUNICATION MEDIA, P513 Van Dijck J., 2013, CULTURE CONNECTIVITY Wang HX, 2021, CHILD YOUTH SERV REV, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105841 Wang ZK, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16071183 Wu CY, 2019, J FORMOS MED ASSOC, V118, P514, DOI 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.10.022 Xue J, 2018, INT J OFFENDER THER, V62, P4904, DOI 10.1177/0306624X18801500 Yang CC, 2017, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V20, P52, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2016.0562 Zhou ZY, 2011, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V31, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.07.007 Zohor Ali Aliffitri Ali, 2021, Addict Behav Rep, V14, P100350, DOI 10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100350 NR 80 TC 1 Z9 1 PU PHCOG NET PI KARNATAKA PA 17, 2ND FLR, BUDDHA VIHAR RD, NEAR SPORTS ZONE, COX TOWN, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA, 560005, INDIA PD SEP-DEC PY 2021 VL 10 IS 3 SI SI BP 337 EP 347 DI 10.5530/jscires.10.3.50 WC Information Science & Library Science SC Information Science & Library Science ER PT J AU Yang, ZY Xu, WT AF Yang, Zeyang Xu, Wenting TI Who post more negatively on social media? A large-scale sentiment analysis of Weibo users SO CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Article; Early Access DE Negative posts; Weibo users; Sentiment analysis; Big data ID CELL-PHONE USE; INTERNET AB Negative behaviours on social media have been widely researched in cyberpsychology studies. However, studies using actual usage data are still limited, especially for the Chinese social media Weibo. The present study aims to investigate the relationship between Weibo users' actual usage and negative online behaviours. We located 2463 Weibo users who had posted highly negative posts after screening 10,483,628 comments under nine trending topics. Their publicly visible usage data were collected and 4,273,442 microblogs (including 234,379 original posts) were analysed using sentiment analysis. Results show that the users' percentage of negative posts was positively correlated with their number of posts, number of followers, number of followings and Weibo account levels. The majority (94.84%) of the 2463 negative comment releasers did not frequently post negative microblogs; less than 50% of their total original posts were negative. Women posted more negatively than men. The present study contributes to the understanding of Weibo users' negative posting behaviours. More investigations are needed for the reasons for negative behaviours on social media and the approaches of predicting negative online behaviours from general usage data. C1 [Yang, Zeyang; Xu, Wenting] Soochow Univ, Sch Educ, Dept Psychol, Suzhou, Peoples R China. C3 Soochow University - China RP Yang, ZY (corresponding author), Soochow Univ, Sch Educ, Dept Psychol, Suzhou, Peoples R China. EM yangzeyangyzy@hotmail.com FU Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [21YJCZH200]; Social Science Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province [21XWC005]; High level personnel (Shuang chuang) project of Jiangsu Province [JSSCBS20210698]; Soochow University [21XM1004] FX The present study was funded by the Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China under grant number 21YJCZH200; Social Science Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province under grant number 21XWC005, High level personnel (Shuang chuang) project of Jiangsu Province under grant number JSSCBS20210698; Soochow University under grant number 21XM1004. CR Brand M, 2019, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V104, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032 Brand M, 2016, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V71, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033 Buckels EE, 2014, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V67, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016 Cheng J, 2017, CSCW'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, P1217, DOI 10.1145/2998181.2998213 Craig W, 2020, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V66, pS100, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.006 Elhai JD, 2017, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V207, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030 Golbeck J., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (PASSAT/SocialCom 2011), P149, DOI 10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.33 Guntuku S. C., 2019, P 13 INT C WEB SOC M, V13, P236 Hardaker C, 2010, J POLITENESS RES-LAN, V6, P215, DOI 10.1515/JPLR.2010.011 Hussain Z, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00211 Jenaro C, 2007, ADDICT RES THEORY, V15, P309, DOI 10.1080/16066350701350247 Kyriacou C, 2016, PASTOR CARE EDUC, V34, P34, DOI 10.1080/02643944.2015.1134631 Lepp A, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V31, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049 Mayor E, 2021, ROY SOC OPEN SCI, V8, DOI 10.1098/rsos.201900 Orben A, 2019, PSYCHOL SCI, V30, P682, DOI 10.1177/0956797619830329 Peterka-Bonetta J., 2021, HUM BEHAV EMERG TECH Przybylski AK, 2017, PSYCHOL SCI, V28, P204, DOI 10.1177/0956797616678438 Qi Gao, 2012, User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Proceedings 20th International Conference, UMAP 2012, P88, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4_8 Qiu L, 2012, J RES PERS, V46, P710, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.008 Slonje R, 2008, SCAND J PSYCHOL, V49, P147, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x Smith PK, 2008, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V49, P376, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x Statista, 2022, MOST POPULAR SOCIAL Tomaiuolo M, 2020, FUTURE INTERNET, V12, DOI 10.3390/fi12020031 van Deursen AJAM, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V45, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039 Weiser EB, 2000, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V3, P167, DOI 10.1089/109493100316012 Weiser EB, 2001, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V4, P723, DOI 10.1089/109493101753376678 Xu Linhong, 2008, Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, V27, P180 Yu L, 2021, APPL RES QUAL LIFE, V16, P2419, DOI 10.1007/s11482-021-09912-y [袁加锦 Yuan Jiajin], 2012, [心理科学进展, Advances in Psychological Science], V20, P10 NR 29 TC 0 Z9 0 PU SPRINGER PI NEW YORK PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES PD 2022 AUG 18 PY 2022 DI 10.1007/s12144-022-03616-8 EA AUG 2022 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Ellison, JM Semlow, AR Jaeger, EC Griffth, DM AF Ellison, Jennifer M. Semlow, Andrea R. Jaeger, Emily C. Griffth, Derek M. TI COVID-19 and MENtal Health: Addressing Men's Mental Health Needs in the Digital World SO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH LA English DT Article DE Mental health; men's health; pandemic; COVID-19; help-seeking behaviors AB The COVID-19 pandemic continues to be a source of stress and have important mental health implications for all persons but may have unique implications for men. In addition to the risk of contracting and dying from COVID-19, the rising COVID-19 death toll, ongoing economic uncertainty, loneliness from social distancing, and other changes to our lifestyles make up the perfect recipe for a decline in mental health. In June 2020, men reported slightly lower rates of anxiety than women, but had higher rates of depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. As of September 2020, men sought mental health care at a higher rate than women for family and relationships, with year-over-year visits up 5.5 times and total virtual mental health care visits monthly growth in 2020 was up 79% since January. Because men are not a homogeneous group, it is important to implement strategies for groups of men that may have particularly unique needs. In this paper, we discuss considerations for intervening in men's mental health during and in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including current technology-based cyberpsychology options. C1 [Ellison, Jennifer M.; Semlow, Andrea R.; Jaeger, Emily C.; Griffth, Derek M.] Vanderbilt Univ, Ctr Res Mens Hlth, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA. [Semlow, Andrea R.] Parkland Hosp & Hlth Syst, Dallas, TX USA. [Griffth, Derek M.] Vanderbilt Univ, Ctr Med Hlth & Soc, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA. [Griffth, Derek M.] Georgetown Univ, Racial Justice Inst, Ctr Mens Hlth Equ, 3700 O St,NW, Washington, DC 20057 USA. C3 Vanderbilt University; Vanderbilt University; Georgetown University RP Griffth, DM (corresponding author), Georgetown Univ, Racial Justice Inst, Ctr Mens Hlth Equ, 3700 O St,NW, Washington, DC 20057 USA. EM derek.griffith@georgetown.edu FU Vanderbilt University FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This paper has been supported in part by Vanderbilt University. CR Alamo C, 2020, COVID 19 LAB MARK WH COVID 19 LAB MARK WH Baer D., 2016, POTENTIAL DANGER THE Bonoir A., 2015, PSYCHOL TODAY Boserup B, 2020, AM J EMERG MED, V38, P2753, DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.077 Broster A, 2020, FORBES Callanan VJ, 2012, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V47, P857, DOI 10.1007/s00127-011-0393-5 Carlo AD, 2019, NPJ DIGIT MED, V2, DOI 10.1038/s41746-019-0129-6 Caron C., 2021, NEW YORK TIMES Czeisler ME, 2020, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V69, P1049, DOI [10.1101/2020.04.22.20076141v1, 10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1] Ellingrud K., 2021, FORTUNE Evans ML, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V383, P2302, DOI 10.1056/NEJMp2024046 Fancourt D., 2020, COVID 19 SOCIAL STUD Fiore M., 2020, BRAIN FOG FOLLOWING BRAIN FOG FOLLOWING Gao Z, 2020, J CLIN MED, V9, DOI 10.3390/jcm9061986 Grant K., 2021, MEDPAGE TODAY Janiri D, 2021, JAMA PSYCHIAT, V78, P567, DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0109 Keeter S., 2021, MANY AM CONTINUE EXP Kluger J, 2020, TIME Landi H., 2020, DEMAND VIRTUAL MENTA Leah C., 2021, WIRED Mann B., 2020, NATL PUBLIC RADIO Martin LA, 2013, JAMA PSYCHIAT, V70, P1100, DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1985 McKenzie SK, 2018, AM J MENS HEALTH, V12, P1247, DOI 10.1177/1557988318772732 Men's Minds Matter, 2020, STRESS SYMPT MEN STRESS SYMPT MEN Mental Health America, 2021, COVID 19 MENT HLTH G COVID 19 MENT HLTH G Mueller JT, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2019378118 National Institute of Mental Health, 2017, MEN DEPR Noguchi Y., 2020, NATL PUBLIC RADIO Parent MC, 2018, AM J MENS HEALTH, V12, P64, DOI 10.1177/1557988315625776 Parker K., 2020, EC FALLOUT COVID 19 Riggio R., 2014, PSYCHOL TODAY Schneiderman N, 2005, ANNU REV CLIN PSYCHO, V1, P607, DOI 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144141 Stawarz K, 2019, JMIR MENT HEALTH, V6, DOI 10.2196/12546 Talkspace, 2020, WALKTHR TALKSP COOL WALKTHR TALKSP COOL Tamayo J., 2021, NEW YORK TIMES The White House, 2021, NITRIC OXIDE THERAPY White V., 2021, NBC NEWS Worsham CM, 2020, ANN AM THORAC SOC, V17, P926, DOI 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202004-322VP NR 38 TC 11 Z9 11 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC PI THOUSAND OAKS PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA PD JUL PY 2021 VL 15 IS 4 AR 15579883211030021 DI 10.1177/15579883211030021 WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ER PT J AU Binford, J Dolan, M Elhai, JD Contractor, AA AF Binford, Jade Dolan, Megan Elhai, Jon D. Contractor, Ateka A. TI Examining Relationships Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Severity and Types of Media/Technology Usage SO PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA-THEORY RESEARCH PRACTICE AND POLICY LA English DT Article; Early Access DE posttraumatic stress disorder; media usage; technology usage; trauma experiences; trauma-exposed ID INTERNET ADDICTION; DEPRESSION; SCALE; VALIDITY; ANXIETY; TRAUMA; MEDIA; PHQ-9; PTSD AB Objective: Psychopathology, cyberpsychology, and mass media theories link psychological symptoms, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), to increased media and technology usage (MTU). Given limited research in this area, we uniquely examined if specific MTU facets were associated with PTSD symptom severity. Method: A sample of 404 socioeconomically diverse adults (M-age = 35.89; 57.4% female) was recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk and completed the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5, Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Results: Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicated that, controlling for depression severity, greater frequency of TV viewing (p = .004) and media sharing (p = .040) and greater quantity of online friendships (p = .006) were associated with greater PTSD symptom severity. Conclusion: Study findings suggest that the extent of MTU behaviors (especially extent of TV use, media sharing, and online friendships) are important to examine in trauma-exposed individuals with PTSD symptoms. Results generalize to trauma-exposed community members and are considered within the context of current MTU theories. C1 [Binford, Jade] George Fox Univ, Dept Psychol, Newberg, OR USA. [Dolan, Megan; Contractor, Ateka A.] Univ North Texas, Dept Psychol, Denton, TX 76203 USA. [Elhai, Jon D.] Univ Toledo, Dept Psychol, Toledo, OH 43606 USA. [Elhai, Jon D.] Univ Toledo, Dept Psychiat, Toledo, OH 43606 USA. C3 George Fox University; University of North Texas System; University of North Texas Denton; University System of Ohio; University of Toledo; University System of Ohio; University of Toledo RP Binford, J; Dolan, M (corresponding author), Univ North Texas, Dept Psychol, Denton, TX 76203 USA. EM jadebinford@gmail.com; megandolan@my.unt.edu CR Andreassen CS, 2016, PSYCHOL ADDICT BEHAV, V30, P252, DOI 10.1037/adb0000160 Bovin MJ, 2016, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V28, P1379, DOI 10.1037/pas0000254 Brand M, 2016, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V71, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033 Caplan SE, 2003, COMMUN RES, V30, P625, DOI 10.1177/0093650203257842 Chmielewski M, 2020, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V11, P464, DOI 10.1177/1948550619875149 Contractor AA, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V72, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.051 Davis RA, 2001, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V17, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8 Elhai JD, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V69, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.023 Ellis DA, 2019, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V130, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.004 Garcia-Oliva C, 2016, J BEHAV ADDICT, V5, P293, DOI 10.1556/2006.5.2016.041 Ginzburg K, 2010, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V123, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2009.08.006 Hauser DJ, 2016, BEHAV RES METHODS, V48, P400, DOI 10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z Jun S, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V49, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.001 Kroenke K, 2002, PSYCHIAT ANN, V32, P509, DOI 10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06 Kroenke K, 2001, J GEN INTERN MED, V16, P606, DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x Lai CM, 2015, PUBLIC HEALTH, V129, P1224, DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.031 Ledgerwood DM, 2015, J GAMBL STUD, V31, P501, DOI 10.1007/s10899-013-9426-1 Lemmens JS, 2009, MEDIA PSYCHOL, V12, P77, DOI 10.1080/15213260802669458 Peng W, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P329, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0082 Prins A., 2015, PCPTSD5 Przybylski AK, 2020, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V59, P1080, DOI 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.017 Rosen LD, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P2501, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006 Schnurr P. P., 2013, PTSD CHECKLIST DSM 5 Thomas KA, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V77, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.038 van Stolk-Cooke K, 2018, J TRAUMA STRESS, V31, P549, DOI 10.1002/jts.22303 Volpicelli J, 1999, ALCOHOL RES HEALTH, V23, P256 Wang KP, 2022, J AGING HEALTH, V34, P786, DOI 10.1177/08982643211064123 Weathers F.W., 2013, LIFE EVENTS CHECKLIS Yee N, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P772, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772 Yildiz MA, 2017, J EDUC SCI PSYCHOL, V7, P66 NR 30 TC 0 Z9 0 PU EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC PI WASHINGTON PA 750 FIRST ST, NE, WASHINGTON, DC 20002-4242 USA PD 2022 AUG 8 PY 2022 DI 10.1037/tra0001333 EA AUG 2022 WC Psychology, Clinical; Psychiatry SC Psychology; Psychiatry ER PT J AU Voiskunskii, AE AF Voiskunskii, A. E. TI CYBERPSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE ANALYSIS OF MULTISENSORY INTEGRATION SO KONSULTATIVNAYA PSIKHOLOGIYA I PSIKHOTERAPIYA-COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY LA Russian DT Article DE virtual reality; immersion; illusions; cybersickness; multisensory integration; localization AB The paper relates to the branch of cyberpsychology associated with risk factors during immersion in a virtual environment. Specialists in the development and operation of virtual reality systems know that immersion into this environment may be accompanied by symptoms similar to the "motion sickness" of transport vehicle passengers (ships, aircraft, cars). In the paper, these conditions are referred to as a cybersickness (or, cyberdisease). The three leading theories, proposed as an explanation of the causes of cybersickness, are discussed: the theory of sensory conflict, the theory of postural instability (the inability to maintain equilibrium), and the evolutionary (aka toxin) theory. A frequent occurrence of symptoms of cybersickness is a conflict between visual signals and signals from the vestibular system. It is shown that such conflicts can be stimulated in the framework of a specially organized experiment (e.g., the illusion of out-of-body experience) using virtual reality systems. When competing signals (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, tactile, etc.) reach the brain, the data gained with the use of virtual reality systems give a chance to hypothetically determine the localization of the specific area in the brain that ensures the integration of multisensory stimuli. C1 [Voiskunskii, A. E.] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Moscow, Russia. C3 Lomonosov Moscow State University RP Voiskunskii, AE (corresponding author), Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Moscow, Russia. EM vae-msu@mail.ru FU RFBR [17-06-00515] FX This work was supported by RFBR, grant No 17-06-00515. CR Averbukh NV, 2010, VOP PSIKHOL+, P105 Belinskaya E.P, 2013, PSIKHOLOGIYA INTERNE Brechet L, 2018, FRONT BEHAV NEUROSCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00270 Ehrsson HH, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P1048, DOI 10.1126/science.1142175 Gazzaley A., 2019, RASSEYANNYI KAK NASH Haans A., 2006, VIRTUAL REALITY, V9, P149, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10055-005-0014-2, 10.1007/s10055-005-0014-2] Kovalev AI, 2015, EKSP PSIKHOLOGIYA, V8, P45, DOI 10.17759/exppsy.2015080205 Lanier J., 2019, DAWN NEW EVERYTHING Leontev A.N., 1972, PROBLEMY RAZVITIYA P Limanowski J, 2014, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00946 Men'shikova G.Ya., 2018, NATL PSYCHOL J, P113, DOI [10.11621/npj.2018.0212, DOI 10.11621/NPJ.2018.0212] Perepelkina O.S., 2014, PSIKHOLOGICHESKIE IS, V7 Petkova VI, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003832 Selivanov V.V., 2017, PSIKHOLOGIYA KOGNITI, P64 Selivanov V.V., 2014, OBRAZOVATELNYE TEKHN, V17, P378 Smith AM, 2014, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00070 Smyslova OV, 2019, PSIKHOL ZH, V40, P85, DOI 10.31857/S020595920005473-6 Soldatova G. U., 2017, TSIFROVOE POKOLENIE Spitzer M., 2014, ANTIMOZG TSIFROVYE T Velichkovsky BB, 2016, EKSP PSIKHOLOGIYA, V9, P5, DOI 10.17759/exppsy.2016090102 [Войскунский Александр Евгеньевич Voiskounsky A.E.], 2008, [Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14: Психология, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya], P22 Voiskunskii A.E., 2013, ROZHDENIE KOLLEKTIVN, P263 Voiskunskii A.E., 2017, GOSUDARSTVO GRAZHDAN, P308 [Войскунский Александр Евгеньевич Voiskunskiy A.E.], 2016, [Человек, Human Being, Chelovek], P36 [Войскунский Александр Евгеньевич Voiskunskiy A.E.], 2014, [Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14: Психология, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya], P90 NR 25 TC 1 Z9 1 PU MOSCOW STATE UNIV PSYCHOLOGY & EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2019 VL 27 IS 3 BP 9 EP 21 DI 10.17759/cpp.2019270302 WC Psychology, Clinical SC Psychology ER PT J AU McNicol, ML Thorsteinsson, EB AF McNicol, Michelle L. Thorsteinsson, Einar B. TI Internet Addiction, Psychological Distress, and Coping Responses Among Adolescents and Adults SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Article DE internet addiction; cyberpsychology; coping; distress; compulsive internet use ID SUBSTANCE USE; LIFE EVENTS; ALCOHOL; DISORDER; STRESS; RISK; PERSONALITY; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY; SCALES AB As Internet use grows, so do the benefits and also the risks. Thus, it is important to identify when individuals' Internet use is problematic. In the present study, 449 participants aged from 16 to 71 years of age were sourced from a wide range of English-speaking Internet forums, including social media and self-help groups. Of these, 68.9% were classified as nonproblematic users, 24.4% as problematic users, and 6.7% as addictive Internet users. High use of discussion forums, high rumination levels, and low levels of self-care were the main contributing factors to Internet addiction (IA) among adolescents. For adults IA was mainly predicted through engagement in online video gaming and sexual activity, low email use, as well as high anxiety and high avoidant coping. Problematic Internet users scored higher on emotion and avoidance coping responses in adults and higher on rumination and lower on self-care in adolescents. Avoidance coping responses mediated the relationship between psychological distress and IA. These findings may assist clinicians with designing interventions to target different factors associated with IA. C1 [McNicol, Michelle L.; Thorsteinsson, Einar B.] Univ New England, Dept Psychol, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. C3 University of New England RP Thorsteinsson, EB (corresponding author), Univ New England, Dept Psychol, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. EM ethorste@une.edu.au CR Akin A., 2011, INT ONLINE J ED SCI, V3, P138 American Psychiatric Association, 2005, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT Antony MM, 1998, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V10, P176, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176 Arnarsson A, 2015, SCAND J PUBLIC HEALT, V43, P497, DOI 10.1177/1403494815585402 Bernardi S, 2009, COMPR PSYCHIAT, V50, P510, DOI 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.11.011 Brand M, 2014, FRONT PSYCHOL, V5, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01256 Brook DW, 2002, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V59, P1039, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.59.11.1039 Deatherage S, 2014, J AM COLL HEALTH, V62, P40, DOI 10.1080/07448481.2013.843536 Griffiths M. D., 2005, J SUBST USE, V10, P191, DOI DOI 10.1080/14659890500114359 Hayes A.F., 2013, INTRO MEDIATION MODE ICT Data and Statistics Division, 2016, ICT FACTS FIG 2016 King DL, 2013, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V47, P1058, DOI 10.1177/0004867413491159 Kirschner PA, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P1237, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024 Ko CH, 2012, EUR PSYCHIAT, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.04.011 Kotov R, 2010, PSYCHOL BULL, V136, P768, DOI 10.1037/a0020327 Kuss DJ, 2014, CURR PHARM DESIGN, V20, P4026, DOI 10.2174/13816128113199990617 Kuss DJ, 2014, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V12, P351, DOI 10.1007/s11469-013-9459-9 Kuss DJ, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P959, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.024 Leung L, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P204, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9967 Li DP, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P1199, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.031 Lovibond S. H., 1995, MANUAL DEPRESSION AN Malouff JM, 2007, J DRUG EDUC, V37, P277, DOI 10.2190/DE.37.3.d Maxwell SE, 2007, PSYCHOL METHODS, V12, P23, DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23 McCormick R A, 1994, J Gambl Stud, V10, P77, DOI 10.1007/BF02109780 Morrison CM, 2010, PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, V43, P121, DOI 10.1159/000277001 Muller KW, 2014, COMPR PSYCHIAT, V55, P770, DOI 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.01.010 Muller KW, 2014, BEHAV INFORM TECHNOL, V33, P757, DOI 10.1080/0144929X.2013.810778 Peterson K, 2011, SUBST USE MISUSE, V46, P1726, DOI 10.3109/10826084.2011.618962 Petry NM, 2013, ADDICTION, V108, P1186, DOI 10.1111/add.12162 Preacher KJ, 2011, PSYCHOL METHODS, V16, P93, DOI 10.1037/a0022658 ROGER D, 1993, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V15, P619, DOI 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90003-L Rogers RC., 1998, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V1, P25, DOI DOI 10.1089/CPB.1998.1.25 Romano M, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055162 Rooke S, 2010, ADDICTION, V105, P1381, DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02975.x Rooke SE, 2008, ADDICT BEHAV, V33, P1314, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.06.009 Shaw M, 2008, CNS DRUGS, V22, P353, DOI 10.2165/00023210-200822050-00001 Sveinbjornsdottir S., 2014, PSYCHOLOGY, V5, P142, DOI [10.4236/psych.2014.52022, DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2014.52022] Sveinbjornsdottir S, 2008, SCAND J PSYCHOL, V49, P533, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00669.x Tao R, 2010, ADDICTION, V105, P556, DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02828.x Thorsteinsson E. B., 2013, OPEN J DEPRESSION, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.4236/OJD.2013.21001, 10.4236/ojd.2013.21001, DOI 10.4236/OJD.2013.2100] Thorsteinsson EB., 2014, OPEN J DEPRESSION, V03, P13, DOI [10.4236/ojd.2014.31005, DOI 10.4236/OJD.2014.31005] Thorsteinsson EB, 2013, AUST J EDUC DEV PSYC, V13, P75 Weinstein A, 2010, AM J DRUG ALCOHOL AB, V36, P277, DOI 10.3109/00952990.2010.491880 Wills TA, 2001, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V110, P309, DOI 10.1037//0021-843X.110.2.309 Young K. S., 1998, CAUGHT NET RECOGNIZE Young K, 2009, J CONTEMP PSYCHOTHER, V39, P241, DOI 10.1007/s10879-009-9120-x NR 46 TC 90 Z9 91 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD MAY PY 2017 VL 20 IS 5 BP 296 EP 304 DI 10.1089/cyber.2016.0669 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Ayiter, E AF Ayiter, Elif TI alpha.tribe SO JOURNAL OF CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES LA English DT Article DE avatar; alt; metaverse; embodiment; identity; creativity; appearance; play ID VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS; ONLINE; REAL AB This paper takes a first-hand look at the creation of multiple identities through multiple avatars by a single user in Second Life. This phenomenon, together with its non-virtual predecessors such as the literary nom de plume, challenges the validity of the notion of the undivided 'self', particularly in the context of creative practices. 'alpha.tribe' is an experimental group of avatars who have founded a virtual fashion business in Second Life (R). The creative output of this enterprise provides the visual context through which the primarily self-observational study of the author will be presented. Within this framework, references from presence studies, cyberpsychology and ludology will also be drawn upon. A designer and artist, as well as an art educator, the author wished to investigate whether the consistency of the creative self is in fact a given and whether it might not be challenged. Thus five avatars, of both sexes, human as well as non-human, have pooled their resources in the operation of a design enterprise, within which each virtual identity pursues his/her own line of creative inquiry, culminating in different lines of output. A discussion of this ongoing experiment, supplemented with a visual documentation of the work engendered, forms the bulwark of this text. C1 Sabanci Univ, Planetary Coll CAiiA Hub, Istanbul, Turkey. C3 Sabanci University RP Ayiter, E (corresponding author), Sabanci Univ, Planetary Coll CAiiA Hub, Istanbul, Turkey. EM ayiter@sabanciuniv.edu CR Ascott R., 2003, TELEMATIC EMBRACE VI AYITER E, 2008, MY MANY DESIGNER PER AYITER E, 2008, AVATARS ALPHA TRIBE AYITER E, 2008, MY ALTS AYITER E, 2008, NEW REAL BEING SYNCR Ayiter E, 2008, TECHNOETIC ARTS, V6, P41, DOI 10.1386/tear.6.1.41_1 BABELI G, 2009, GARIZA BABELI Boellstorff T, 2008, COMING OF AGE IN SECOND LIFE: AN ANTHROPOLOGIST EXPLORES THE VIRTUALLY HUMAN, P1 Brennan Geoffrey., 2004, ANAL KRITIK, V26, P139 Castranova E., 2007, EXODUS VIRTUAL WORLD Chandler D, 2007, REV ENGL STUD, V58, P669, DOI 10.1093/res/hgl155 Dreiser Theodore, 1935, ENGL J, V24, P615 Hansen Mark B. N., 2006, BODIES CODE INTERFAC Huizinga J., 1938, HOMOLUDENS STUDY PLA IJsselsteijn WA, 2000, PROC SPIE, V3959, P520, DOI 10.1117/12.387188 JOERISSEN B, 2008, PARAGRANA, V17 Lombard M., 1997, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1083-6101.1997.TB00072.X Mantovani G, 1999, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V8, P540, DOI 10.1162/105474699566459 McCullough M., 1996, ABSTRACTING CRAFT PR MEEHAN M, 2000, PRES 2000 WORKSH DEL MOSWITZER M, 2009, WHITENOISE Slater M, 1997, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V6, P603, DOI 10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603 Slater M, 1999, IEEE COMPUT GRAPH, V19, P6, DOI 10.1109/38.749116 SUTER J, 1996, CHAT COMMUNICATION, P305 Sutton-Smith B., 2001, AMBIGUITY PLAY Yee N, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P115, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9984 Yee N, 2009, COMMUN RES, V36, P285, DOI 10.1177/0093650208330254 NR 27 TC 5 Z9 5 PU IMPRINT ACADEMIC PI THORVERTON PA PO BOX 1, THORVERTON EX5 5YX, ENGLAND PD JUL-AUG PY 2010 VL 17 IS 7-8 SI SI BP 119 EP 138 WC Philosophy; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary SC Philosophy; Social Sciences - Other Topics ER PT J AU Kozan, HIO Baloglu, M Kesici, S Arpaci, I AF Kozan, H. Irem Ozteke Baloglu, Mustafa Kesici, Sahin Arpaci, Ibrahim TI The Role of Personality and Psychological Needs on the Problematic Internet Use and Problematic Social Media Use SO ADDICTA-THE TURKISH JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS LA English DT Article DE Personality; Psychological needs; Problematic Internet use; Social media ID BIG 5 PERSONALITY; SELF-DETERMINATION; NETWORKING SITES; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; 5-FACTOR MODEL; FACEBOOK USE; FIT INDEXES; ADDICTION; ONLINE; SATISFACTION AB Current study investigates the relationships among personality characteristics, psychological needs, problematic Internet use and problematic social media use. A theoretical model was specified, estimated, and evaluated based on the data collected from 436 college students (Mean Age = 20.93 years, SD = 2.11 years). First, structural equation modeling approach was used to validate the research model. The model suggests that personality has significant direct and indirect effects on problematic Internet use but it has only a significant indirect effect on problematic social media use through psychological needs. Further, there is also a significant direct effect of psychological needs on both problematic Internet use and problematic social media use. An increase in neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness leads to an increase in dominance, autonomy, affiliation, and achievement, whereas an increase in psychological needs leads to a decrease in problematic Internet use and problematic social media use. Implications of the findings are discussed for theory and practice in cyberpsychology. C1 [Kozan, H. Irem Ozteke; Kesici, Sahin] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Ahmet Kelesoglu Sch Educ, Dept Counseling, TR-42090 Konya, Turkey. [Baloglu, Mustafa] Hacettepe Univ, Sch Sch Educ, Ankara, Turkey. [Arpaci, Ibrahim] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Educ Technol, Tokat, Turkey. C3 Necmettin Erbakan University; Hacettepe University; Gaziosmanpasa University RP Baloglu, M (corresponding author), Hacettepe Univ, Sch Sch Educ, Ankara, Turkey. EM iromort_1907@hotmail.com; baloglu@hotmail.com; sahinkesici@konya.edu.tr; ibrahim.arpaci@gop.edu.tr CR Amichai-Hamburger Y, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P1289, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018 [Anonymous], 2008, SELCUK U SOCIAL SCI [Anonymous], 2003, PERSONALITY ADULTHOO, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203428412 Arpaci I, 2018, INTERNET RES, V28, P293, DOI 10.1108/IntR-11-2016-0353 Bacanli H, 2009, TURK EGITIM BILIMLER, V7, P261 Baggio S, 2017, ADDICT RES THEORY, V25, P114, DOI 10.1080/16066359.2016.1206083 Baloglu M, 2018, J MED INTERNET RES, V20, DOI 10.2196/jmir.8947 Bannon S, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V53, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.057 Beard KW, 2005, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V8, P7, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.7 BENTLER PM, 1980, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P588, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 Bollen K. A., 1989, STRUCTURAL EQUATION Caniels MCJ, 2015, INTERNET RES, V25, P358, DOI 10.1108/IntR-12-2013-0266 Carbonell X, 2017, ADDICT RES THEORY, V25, P48, DOI 10.1080/16066359.2016.1197915 Casale S, 2018, ADDICT BEHAV, V76, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.038 Casale Silvia, 2015, Addict Behav Rep, V1, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.03.008 Chen JV, 2015, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V31, P815, DOI 10.1080/10447318.2015.1067479 Chou YC, 2015, ADV INTELL SYST, V355, P141, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-17398-6_13 Costa P. T., 1992, REVISED NEO PERSONAL Davis RA, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P331, DOI 10.1089/109493102760275581 Deci EL, 2008, HDB PERSONALITY THEO, V3, P654, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781444318111.CH8 [邓林园 Deng Linyuan], 2012, [心理科学, Journal of Psychological Science], V35, P123 Devaraj S, 2008, INFORM SYST RES, V19, P93, DOI 10.1287/isre.1070.0153 Dizen M, 2005, COGNITION EMOTION, V19, P1140, DOI 10.1080/02699930500260468 Engeser S, 2010, SCAND J PSYCHOL, V51, P309, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00773.x Giota KG, 2014, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V30, P985, DOI 10.1080/10447318.2014.925770 Greenaway KH, 2016, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V46, P294, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.2169 Greguras GJ, 2009, J APPL PSYCHOL, V94, P465, DOI 10.1037/a0014068 Greitemeyer T, 2014, BASIC APPL SOC PSYCH, V36, P252, DOI 10.1080/01973533.2014.900619 Hair J. F, 2006, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN Heckert TM, 2000, J SOC BEHAV PERS, V15, P121 Islam S, 2018, J SUBST USE, V23, P103, DOI 10.1080/14659891.2017.1358305 Kesici S., 2010, P SOC INF TECHN TEAC, V1, P1471 Kesici S, 2009, PSYCHOL REP, V105, P1103, DOI 10.2466/PR0.105.F.1103-1112 Kim H, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P658, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2014.0109 Kim J, 2018, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V38, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.003 Kim J, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P451, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0327 Kim Y, 2015, INTERNET RES, V25, P399, DOI 10.1108/IntR-11-2013-0250 Kittinger R, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P324, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0410 Kline R. B, 2015, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, V4th Ko CH, 2014, COMPR PSYCHIAT, V55, P1377, DOI 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.05.003 Kuo T, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V31, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.019 Kuss DJ, 2016, ADDICTA, V3, P185, DOI 10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0106 Kuss DJ, 2011, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V8, P3528, DOI 10.3390/ijerph8093528 Lin H, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V41, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.045 Lin KM, 2015, BEHAV INFORM TECHNOL, V34, P882, DOI 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1027736 Liu QX, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V55, P695, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.048 Lundin A, 2014, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V68, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.002 Mahalanobis P. C., 1936, P NATL I SCI INDIA, V2, P49, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13171-019-00164-5 MARSH HW, 1988, PSYCHOL BULL, V103, P391, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391 Maslow AH, 1943, PSYCHOL REV, V50, P370, DOI 10.1037/h0054346 McCrae R.R., 1999, 5 FACTOR MODEL PERSO, V2, P139 Morahan-Martin J, 2000, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V16, P13, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00049-7 Moretta T, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0190951 Nadkarni A, 2012, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V52, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007 Ozcan NK, 2005, J DEPENDENCE, V6, P19 Park N, 2014, J BROADCAST ELECTRON, V58, P601, DOI 10.1080/08838151.2014.966355 Pearson C, 2016, ADDICTA, V3, P193, DOI 10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0103 Ryan RM, 2006, J PERS, V74, P1557, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x Ryan RM, 2000, AM PSYCHOL, V55, P68, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Ryan T, 2016, ADDICTA, V3, P55, DOI 10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0004 Sahin I., 2010, INT C SOC INF TECHN Seidman G, 2013, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V54, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009 Sheldon KM, 2011, PSYCHOL POP MEDIA CU, V1, P2, DOI 10.1037/2160-4134.1.S.2 Shi XX, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V76, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.028 Skarupova K, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V53, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.047 Stead H, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V76, P534, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.016 Stieger S, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P629, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0323 Tabak I, 2017, PSYCHIATR PSYCHOL KL, V17, P104, DOI 10.15557/PiPK.2017.0011 Tan KA, 2019, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V17, P806, DOI 10.1007/s11469-018-9871-2 Wang JL, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P2313, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.001 Wang LG, 2017, ADDICT RES THEORY, V25, P83, DOI 10.1080/16066359.2016.1206082 Wang Z, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P1829, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.001 Wolff HG, 2012, CAREER DEV INT, V17, P43, DOI 10.1108/13620431211201328 Wu XS, 2016, J ADOLESCENCE, V52, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.07.012 Puerta-Cortes DX, 2014, ADICCIONES, V26, P54, DOI 10.20882/adicciones.131 Yang HL, 2014, INFORM TECHNOL PEOPL, V27, P21, DOI 10.1108/ITP-11-2012-0130 Zhou YY, 2017, ADDICT BEHAV, V64, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.08.009 Zolkepli IA, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V43, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.050 [No title captured] NR 79 TC 5 Z9 5 PU TURKISH GREEN CRESCENT SOC PI ISTANBUL PA SEPETCILER KASRIKENNEDY CAD NO 3 SARAYBURNU, FATIH, ISTANBUL, 34110, TURKEY PD JUN PY 2019 VL 6 IS 2 BP 203 EP 219 DI 10.15805/addicta.2019.6.2.0029 WC Substance Abuse SC Substance Abuse ER PT C AU Paping, C Brinkman, WP van der Mast, C AF Paping, Christian Brinkman, Willem-Paul van der Mast, Charles BE Wiederhold, BK TI An Explorative Study into a Tele-delivered Multi-patient Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy System SO COPING WITH POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER IN RETURNING TROOPS: WOUNDS OF WAR II SE NATO Science for Peace and Security Series E-Human and Societal Dynamics LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Virtual reality exposure therapy; tele-treatment; cyberpsychology; cognitive ergonomics ID MENTAL-HEALTH AB The use of Virtual Reality (VR) technology to support the treatment of patients with phobia, such as the fear of flying, is getting considerable research attention. VR treatment may provide substantial improvement in efficient use of therapist resources and accessibility by delivering the treatment over the internet, to multiple patients simultaneously. This motivated initial exploration into the possibilities of a multiple-patient Virtual Reality Exposure Treatment (VRET). With such a setup, one therapist can monitor and treat multiple-patients simultaneously, each having their own personal VR treatment at their own personal location. The approach taken was (1) a scenario-based investigation with six therapists that had extensive experience in treating patients with VRET, and (2) a controlled lab experiment with 27 (students) participants to examine the effect of an automated assistance function on the therapists' workload and performance when treating three computer-simulated patients over the internet. The findings of both the scenario-based investigation and lab experiment are encouraging. They imply that a tele-delivered multi-patient VRET system might be possible in the future, thereby providing treatment at remote locations and making efficient use of therapist resources. C1 [Paping, Christian; Brinkman, Willem-Paul; van der Mast, Charles] Delft Univ Technol, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands. C3 Delft University of Technology RP Brinkman, WP (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol, Mekelweg 2,EWI HB 12-080, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands. EM w.p.brinkman@tudelft.nl CR [Anonymous], 1993, THESIS [Anonymous], 1986, HDB PERCEPTION PERFO Arciszewski H. F. R., 2008, ADAPTIVE AUTOMATION Bijl RV, 1998, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V33, P587, DOI 10.1007/s001270050098 Boehne DM, 2000, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V81, P178, DOI 10.1006/obhd.1999.2877 Bouman T. K., 1992, ANXIETY DISORDERS A Brinkman W. P., INTERACTING WITH COM Brinkman WP, 2009, VTT SYMP, V258, P169 Carroll J M, 2000, MAKING USE SCENARIO Coolican H., 2004, RESEARCH METHODS AND Datcu D., 2006, COMPSYSTECH 06, pV 1 de Greef T, 2007, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V4565, P439 de Waard D, 1996, MEASUREMENT DRIVERS Endsley MR., 2000, SITUATION AWARENESS, DOI 10.1201/b12461 Garcia-Palacios A, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P722, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9962 Gregg L, 2007, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V42, P343, DOI 10.1007/s00127-007-0173-4 HART S G, 1988, P139 Maguire M, 2001, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V55, P587, DOI 10.1006/ijhc.2001.0503 Neerincx M. A., 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE S Neerincx MA, 2001, ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS VOLUME SIX, P247 Norman D. A., 1983, MENTAL MODELS Parsons TD, 2008, J BEHAV THER EXP PSY, V39, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.07.007 Powers MB, 2008, J ANXIETY DISORD, V22, P561, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.04.006 SCERBO MW, 1996, HUM FAC TRANSP, P37 Schuemie MJ, 2002, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V85, P468 Schuemie MJ, 2003, THESIS Sellen A., 1992, CHI 1992, P652 Van der Mast C. A. P. G., 2007, INT J DISABIL HUM DE, V5, P205 Weick K., 1995, SENSE MAKING IN ORGA NR 29 TC 3 Z9 3 PU IOS PRESS PI AMSTERDAM PA NIEUWE HEMWEG 6B, 1013 BG AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS PY 2010 VL 68 BP 203 EP 219 DI 10.3233/978-1-60750-571-6-203 WC Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary SC Social Sciences - Other Topics ER PT J AU Caponnetto, P Maglia, M Lombardo, D Demma, S Polosa, R AF Caponnetto, Pasquale Maglia, Marilena Lombardo, Daniele Demma, Shirin Polosa, Riccarco TI The role of virtual reality intervention on young adult smokers' motivation to quit smoking: a feasibility and pilot study SO JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES LA English DT Article DE Virtual reality; motivation; smoking; cyberpsychology AB The objective of our research was to compare the initial efficacy and acceptability, in this special population, of different motivational stimuli to improve motivation to quit smoking. We enrolled 40 young adult smokers, between their twenties and their thirties, not motivated to quit. Our study adopted a visual analog scale to assess the motivation to quit at first visit (baseline) and after three different types of stimuli: a packet of cigarettes containing shocking images; a brief film showing pulmonary effects of smoking; a virtual reality period based on the progression of smoking-related illnesses. We compared the motivation to quit smoking between the series of stimuli and between the stimuli and the baseline assessment. Compared with the first assessment, all stimuli were significant in improving the motivation for smoking cessation. There was a statistically significant modification between the packet of cigarettes and the movie. The difference between the packet of cigarettes containing shocking images and the virtual reality was significant. The difference between the film and the virtual reality was also highly significant. The application of virtual reality would appear to greatly increase the motivation to smoking cessation in young adult smokers not motivated to quit. C1 [Caponnetto, Pasquale; Maglia, Marilena; Demma, Shirin; Polosa, Riccarco] Univ Catania, Policlin V Emanuele, CPCT, Catania, Italy. [Caponnetto, Pasquale; Maglia, Marilena; Demma, Shirin; Polosa, Riccarco] Univ Catania, Policlin V Emanuele, COEHAR, Catania, Italy. [Caponnetto, Pasquale] Univ Stirling, Inst Social Mkt, Stirling, Scotland. [Lombardo, Daniele] Behav Labs, Catania, Italy. C3 University of Catania; University of Catania; University of Stirling RP Caponnetto, P (corresponding author), Univ Catania, Policlin V Emanuele, CPCT, Catania, Italy.; Caponnetto, P (corresponding author), Univ Catania, Policlin V Emanuele, COEHAR, Catania, Italy. EM p.caponnetto@unict.it CR Ajzen I., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU Antinucci F, 1999, CON COMPUTER NELLE S, P16 Azagba S, 2013, NICOTINE TOB RES, V15, P708, DOI 10.1093/ntr/nts194 Baumann SB, 2006, PSYCHOL ADDICT BEHAV, V20, P484, DOI 10.1037/0893-164X.20.4.484 Benoit G, 2007, VIRTUAL ARM STOP SMO BIENER L, 1991, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V10, P360, DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.10.5.360 Bordnick PS, 2005, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V8, P487, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.487 Carter BL, 2008, DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEN, V95, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.12.010 Doll R, 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V328, P1519, DOI 10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE Fogg JB, 2005, TECNOLOGIA PERSUASIO Hill WF, 1963, LEARNING SURVEY PSYC Husten CG, 2007, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V97, P1354, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2007.117358 Janis I. L, 1977, DECISION MAKING PSYC Jardin BF, 2012, NICOTINE TOB RES, V14, P1197, DOI 10.1093/ntr/nts015 Lee JH, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P275, DOI 10.1089/109493103322011560 Pericot-Valverde I, 2012, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V181, P292, DOI 10.3233/978-1-61499-121-2-292 Polosa R, 2013, HARM REDUCT J, V10, DOI 10.1186/1477-7517-10-19 PROCHASKA JO, 1992, AM PSYCHOL, V47, P1102, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102 Prochaska JO, 2001, ADDICT BEHAV, V26, P583, DOI 10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00151-9 Prochaska OJ, 2008, TRANSTHEORETICAL MOD, P97 Schultheis MT, 2001, REHABIL PSYCHOL, V46, P296, DOI 10.1037/0090-5550.46.3.296 Skinner B. F., 1938, BEHAV ORG EXPT ANAL STEUER J, 1992, J COMMUN, V42, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x Witkiewitz K, 2004, AM PSYCHOL, V59, P224, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.59.4.224 World Health Organization, 2001, ENC PEOPL STOP SMOK World Health Organization (WHO), 2011, REP GLOB TOB EP WARN NR 26 TC 4 Z9 4 PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD PI ABINGDON PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND PD OCT 2 PY 2018 VL 37 IS 3-4 BP 217 EP 226 DI 10.1080/10550887.2019.1664364 EA OCT 2019 WC Substance Abuse SC Substance Abuse ER PT J AU Shpagina, EM Chirkina, RV AF Shpagina, E. M. Chirkina, R., V TI Competence of Teachers and Psychologists in the Field of Information Security of Children SO PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW LA Russian DT Article DE competence of teachers and psychologists; information security of children; information harmful to health and development of children; cyberpsychology ID ADOLESCENTS AB Protection of interests, personal development, health and well-being of children in the information sphere is now coming to the fore in connection with the rapid digitalization of everyday life. The article deals with the problems of influence of modern information technologies on the younger generation, approaches to risk reduction and information security of children, as well as the problems of formation of competence of teachers and psychologists in this area. Specialists and managers of the education system are faced with the task of educating parents and helping children to overcome the risks and dangers of the Internet environment. According to the authors, the competence of teachers in the field of information security of children should consist of a set of knowledge, including organizational, legal, organizational, technical, psychological and pedagogical aspects of the problem. The main focus of the article is on the legal, psychological and pedagogical aspects of information security of children, which determine the content of training of teachers and psychologists. An approximate thematic plan of the training course for managers and specialists of the education system is presented. C1 [Shpagina, E. M.; Chirkina, R., V] Dept Legal Psychol & Law, Moscow, Russia. RP Shpagina, EM (corresponding author), Dept Legal Psychol & Law, Moscow, Russia. EM shpaginaelena@yandex.ru; rimmach@bk.ru CR Budykin SV, 2016, PSYCHOL LAW, V6, P25, DOI 10.17759/psylaw.2016060104 Budykin SV, 2017, PSYCHOL LAW, V7, P13, DOI 10.17759/psylaw.2017070102 Fedorov A., 2007, RAZVITIE MEDIAKOMPET Gerasimov D. A, 2013, VESTNIK FINANSOVOGO, P141 Livingstone S, 2015, BRIT J EDUC TECHNOL, V46, P988, DOI 10.1111/bjet.12317 Mikhaleva G. V, 2013, VESTNIK CHELGU O'Neill B., 2014, FINAL RECOMMENDATION, P42 Pimonov V. A., 2011, PSIKHOLOGIYA PARVO Rassolov I. M, 2013, VESTNIK MOSKOVSKOGO, P103 Shpagina E.M., 2016, PSIKHOLOGIIA PRAVO, V6, P86, DOI [10.17759/psylaw.2016060409, DOI 10.17759/PSYLAW.2016060409] Soldatova G. U., 2017, UPRAVLENIE PERSONALN Soldatova G. U, 2014, NATSIONALNYI PSIKHOL, P39, DOI [10.11621/npj.2014.0305, DOI 10.11621/NPJ.2014.0305] Soldatova G. U., 2013, TSIFROVAYA KOMPETENO, DOI DOI 10.17759/PSYLAW.2016060409/(IN Uzdenov RM, 2016, RUSS J CRIMINOL, V10, P649, DOI 10.17150/2500-4255.2016.10(4).649-655 Yurchenko O. P, 2013, VESTNIK CHELYABINSKO, P302 NR 15 TC 5 Z9 5 PU MOSCOW STATE PSYCHOLOGICAL & PEDAGOGICAL UNIV PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, DOM 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2019 VL 9 IS 3 BP 261 EP 277 DI 10.17759/psylaw.2019090319 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT C AU Alutaybi, A McAlaney, J Arden-Close, E Stefanidis, A Phalp, K Ali, R AF Alutaybi, Aarif McAlaney, John Arden-Close, Emily Stefanidis, Angelos Phalp, Keith Ali, Raian GP IEEE TI Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) as Really Lived: Five Classifications and one Ecology SO 2019 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIORAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIO-CULTURAL COMPUTING (BESC 2019) LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE Social media; Fear of Missing Out; Digital Wellbeing; Cyberpsychology ID IMPACT AB Social media provides a platform for information sharing and dissemination and has speedily become a popular method for individuals to relate to others regardless of the time and geographical distance. However, this wealth of connectivity and availability of information may lead to the experience of the Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) that typically refers to a preoccupation of the users of social media about lost opportunities when they are offline or unable to connect and communicate as wished. Despite the recognition of the concept, studies around FoMO have used offline data collection techniques such as interviews, focus groups and surveys. This has led to a limited understanding of the lived FoMO experience and a rather simplified and coarse-grained view of the concept. In this paper, we delve into the specifics and nuances of FoMO through multi-stage qualitative research, including interviews, diary study and three focus group sessions and elaborate upon the concept and determine its various manifestations and classification. The lived experience is mainly gathered through a diary study. We present five main classifications characterising FoMO and develop an ecology for it. C1 [Alutaybi, Aarif; McAlaney, John; Arden-Close, Emily; Stefanidis, Angelos; Phalp, Keith; Ali, Raian] Bournemouth Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Poole, Dorset, England. C3 Bournemouth University RP Alutaybi, A (corresponding author), Bournemouth Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Poole, Dorset, England. EM aalutaybi@bournemouth.ac.uk; jmcalaney@bournemouth.ac.uk; eardenclose@bournemouth.ac.uk; astefanidis@bournemouth.ac.uk; kphalp@bournemouth.ac.uk; rali@bournemouth.ac.uk CR Abel J.P., 2016, J BUSINESS EC RES, V14, P33, DOI DOI 10.19030/JBER.V14I1.9554 Ali R, 2015, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V9013, P198, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16101-3_13 Alt D, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V49, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.057 Alutaybi A., 2018, P BRIT HCI, V18, P1 Beyens I, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V64, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.083 Braun V., 2006, QUALITATIVE RES PSYC, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA] Buglass SL, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V66, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.055 Casale S., 2018, ADDICTIVE BEHAV Cheever NA, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V37, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.002 Cialdini R. B., 2009, INFLUENCE SCI PRACTI Dunbar RIM, 1998, GROOMING GOSSIP EVOL Forsyth D.R., 2018, GROUP DYNAMICS Fox J, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V45, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.083 Goffman E., 1956, PRESENTATION SELF EV Hetz PR, 2015, J RES TECHNOL EDUC, V47, P259, DOI 10.1080/15391523.2015.1080585 Lee CC, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P419, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0544 Nigam A, 2016, 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIORAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIO-CULTURAL COMPUTING (BESC), P139 Przybylski AK, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P1841, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014 NR 18 TC 3 Z9 3 PU IEEE PI NEW YORK PA 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA PY 2019 WC Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications SC Computer Science ER PT J AU Settanni, M Marengo, D AF Settanni, Michele Marengo, Davide TI Sharing feelings online: studying emotional well-being via automated text analysis of Facebook posts SO FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Article DE emotional well-being; psychological measurement; psychological assessment; social networking sites; cyberpsychology; psychoinformatics ID COMPUTERIZED CONTENT-ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKING; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; SUBCLINICAL DEPRESSION; LAY ASSESSMENT; ANXIETY; NARCISSISM; STRESS; MEDIA; DISCLOSURES AB Digital traces of activity on social network sites represent a vast source of ecological data with potential connections with individual behavioral and psychological characteristics. The present study investigates the relationship between user-generated textual content shared on Facebook and emotional well-being. Self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and stress were collected from 201 adult Facebook users from North Italy. Emotion-related textual indicators, including emoticon use, were extracted form users' Facebook posts via automated text analysis. Correlation analyses revealed that individuals with higher levels of depression, anxiety expressed negative emotions on Facebook more frequently. In addition, use of emoticons expressing positive emotions correlated negatively with stress level. When comparing age groups, younger users reported higher frequency of both emotion-related words and emoticon use in their posts. Also, the relationship between online emotional expression and self-report emotional well-being was generally stronger in the younger group. Overall, findings support the feasibility and validity of studying individual emotional well-being by means of examination of Facebook profiles. Implications for online screening purposes and future research directions are discussed. C1 [Settanni, Michele] Univ Turin, Dept Psychol, I-10124 Turin, Italy. [Marengo, Davide] Univ Aosta Valley, Dept Social Sci & Humanities, Aosta, Italy. C3 University of Turin; Universita Della Valle D'aosta RP Settanni, M (corresponding author), Univ Turin, Dept Psychol, Via Verdi 10, I-10124 Turin, Italy. EM michele.settanni@unito.it CR Ahmad NY, 2014, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V94, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.021 Alparone F., 2004, ITALIAN LIWC2001 DIC Alpers GW, 2005, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V21, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.008 Argamon Shlomo, 2007, First Monday, V12 Arnett JJ, 2007, CHILD DEV PERSPECT, V1, P68, DOI 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x Bantum EO, 2009, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V21, P79, DOI 10.1037/a0014643 Barbier G, 2011, SOCIAL NETWORK DATA ANALYTICS, P327 Bekker HL, 2003, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V50, P323, DOI 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00056-9 Bevan JL, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V39, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.021 Blei DM, 2003, J MACH LEARN RES, V3, P993, DOI 10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993 Chen WY, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P728, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0272 Christofides E, 2012, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V3, P48, DOI 10.1177/1948550611408619 Coyne SM, 2013, EMERG ADULTHOOD, V1, P125, DOI 10.1177/2167696813479782 Davenport SW, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V32, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.011 De Choudhury M., 2013, P 5 ANN ACM WEB SCI, P47 Denti L., 2012, SWEDENS LARGEST FACE Fernandez KC, 2012, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V3, P706, DOI 10.1177/1948550611434967 Gibson L, 2010, P 24 BCS INT SPEC GR, P186 Golder SA, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1878, DOI 10.1126/science.1202775 Hayes M, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V49, P507, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.040 He QW, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V33, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.026 Henry JD, 2005, BRIT J CLIN PSYCHOL, V44, P227, DOI 10.1348/014466505X29657 Herring SC, 2004, BLOGOSPHERE RHETORIC Hofmann SG, 2012, COGNITION EMOTION, V26, P720, DOI 10.1080/02699931.2011.602048 Hollenbaugh EE, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V30, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.055 Kosinski M, 2014, MACH LEARN, V95, P357, DOI 10.1007/s10994-013-5415-y Kramer ADI, 2010, CHI2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, P287 Landauer TK, 1998, DISCOURSE PROCESS, V25, P259, DOI 10.1080/01638539809545028 Lin H, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V41, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.045 Liu P., CYBERPSYCHO IN PRESS Manago AM, 2012, DEV PSYCHOL, V48, P369, DOI 10.1037/a0026338 Mehdizadeh S, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P357, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0257 Mehl MR, 2006, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V18, P340, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.18.3.340 Moreno MA, 2011, DEPRESS ANXIETY, V28, P447, DOI 10.1002/da.20805 Morrison Kimberlee, 2014, GROWTH SOCIAL MEDIA Panek ET, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P2004, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.012 Park M., 2012, P ACM SIGKDD WORKSH, P1 Park S, 2013, J MED INTERNET RES, V15, P163, DOI 10.2196/jmir.2718 Pennebaker J., 2007, LINGUISTIC INQUIRY W Pfeil U, 2009, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V25, P643, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.015 Pirzadeh A., 2012, P HUM FACT ERG SOC A, DOI [10.1177/1071181312561051, DOI 10.1177/1071181312561051] Rodriguez AJ, 2010, J PERS, V78, P575, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00627.x Rosen LD, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P1243, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.012 Ryan T, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1658, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004 Satici SA, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V49, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.005 Schwartz H. A., 2014, P WORKSHOP COMPUTATI, P118, DOI DOI 10.3115/V1/W14-3214 Severino GA, 2010, PSYCHOL HEALTH MED, V15, P607, DOI 10.1080/13548506.2010.498889 Sinn D, 2014, ARCH SCI-NETHERLANDS, V14, P95, DOI 10.1007/s10502-013-9208-7 Statistic Brain, 2014, FAC STAT 2014 Tausczik YR, 2010, J LANG SOC PSYCHOL, V29, P24, DOI 10.1177/0261927X09351676 Thakur S., 2014, INT J EMERG TECHNOL, V4, P904 Tov W, 2013, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V25, P1069, DOI 10.1037/a0033007 Vaterlaus JM, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V45, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.013 Wald R, 2012, 2012 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS (ICMLA 2012), VOL 2, P394, DOI 10.1109/ICMLA.2012.228 Wang N, 2014, SOC INDIC RES, V115, P483, DOI 10.1007/s11205-012-9996-9 Winter S, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V34, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.048 Wright KB, 2013, J HEALTH COMMUN, V18, P41, DOI 10.1080/10810730.2012.688250 NR 57 TC 60 Z9 62 PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA PI LAUSANNE PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND PD JUL 23 PY 2015 VL 6 AR 1045 DI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01045 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Pouyakian, M AF Pouyakian, Mostafa TI Cybergonomics: Proposing and justification of a new name for the ergonomics of Industry 4.0 technologies SO FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH LA English DT Article DE cybergonomics; ergonomics; Industry 4; 0; cyber-technologies; human factors ID WORK; COMMUNICATION; HEALTH AB Various subdisciplines of ergonomics science have emerged during the past decades as our insight has been broadened of human and performance. The three main branches of ergonomics have evolved over time focusing on the physical, cognitive, and organizational aspects. But the question is, can these disciplines focus and research enough on the ergonomic aspects of cyberspace and Industry 4.0 technologies? Cyber-technologies of the Fourth Industrial revolution are dramatically imposing themselves on our life and work. This has been led to emerging cyber-aspects for human work and life. Hence, many sciences, mainly applied ones, have upgraded to their cyber versions to deal with the emergent issues, usually with a new name, including the cyber prefix. Cyber-medicine, cyber-health, cyber-commerce, and cyberpsychology are some examples. Also, ergonomics requires a similar look. Ergonomic benefits and threats of Industry 4.0 technologies must be considered in an integrated manner. This paper addresses this issue. First, the emergence and development of ergonomics and its subdisciplines chronologically is reviewed. Then, Cybergonomics as a new name and concept is proposed and defined as the ergonomics of Industry 4.0 era. Justification for this portmanteau is described, and an outline of the new realm is explained. Finally, a research road map is proposed for this new subdiscipline of ergonomics. C1 [Pouyakian, Mostafa] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Safety, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Tehran, Iran. C3 Shahid Beheshti University Medical Sciences RP Pouyakian, M (corresponding author), Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Safety, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Tehran, Iran. EM pouyakian@sbmu.ac.ir CR Alhujailli A, 2019, ADV DESIGN INCLUSION Alhujailli A, 2020, SYMMETRY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/sym12091536 Arlinghaus A, 2013, CHRONOBIOL INT, V30, P1197, DOI 10.3109/07420528.2013.800089 Bencsik A, 2016, J COMPETITIVENESS, V8, P90, DOI 10.7441/joc.2016.03.06 Boswell WR, 2007, J MANAGE, V33, P592, DOI 10.1177/0149206307302552 CHAPANIS A, 1972, HUM FACTORS, V14, P487, DOI 10.1177/001872087201400601 CHAPANIS A, 1967, ERGONOMICS, V10, P557, DOI 10.1080/00140136708930910 CHAPANIS A, 1959, HUM FACTORS, V1, P1 Dempsey P.G., 2000, THEORETICAL ISSUES E, V1, P3 Duman MC, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V167, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120615 Endsley MR, 2018, J COGN ENG DECIS MAK, V12, P29, DOI 10.1177/1555343417723432 Ertel M, 2005, WORK STRESS, V19, P293, DOI 10.1080/02678370500307289 Forcina A, 2021, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V180, P436, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.260 Gallo T, 2021, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V180, P388, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.364 Gasova M, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V192, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.038 Grencikova A., 2017, PROB PERSPEC MANAGE, V15, P557, DOI DOI 10.21511/PPM.15(SI).2017.09 Grencikova A, 2020, ADM SCI, V10, DOI 10.3390/admsci10030071 Gualtieri L, 2021, ROBOT CIM-INT MANUF, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.rcim.2020.101998 Hecklau F, 2016, PROC CIRP, V54, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.102 Hendrick HW, 1999, OCCUPATIONAL ERGONOM HENNINGER A, 2007, CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY, V33, P43, DOI DOI 10.1163/156916307X168584 Hollnagel E, 1997, ERGONOMICS, V40, P1170, DOI 10.1080/001401397187685 Internation Standards Organization I, 2020, ERGONOMICS HUMAN SYS International Ergonomics Association (IEA), WHAT IS ERGONOMICS KAPLAN M, 1995, ERGONOMICS, V38, P606, DOI 10.1080/00140139508925134 Kasapoglu OA, 2018, INT J ORGAN LEADERSH, V7, P300 La Regina M, 2021, HEALTHCARE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/healthcare9070811 Landis B, 2016, J ORGAN BEHAV, V37, pS107, DOI 10.1002/job.2004 Longo F, 2021, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V180, P1049, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.350 MacKinnon R., 2012, DEVELOPMENT, V55, P201, DOI DOI 10.1057/dev.2012.5 Maddikunta PKR, 2022, J IND INF INTEGR, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257 Memon KR., 2021, ACAD ENTREPRENEUR J, V27, P1 NAGAMACHI M, 1995, INT J IND ERGONOM, V15, P371, DOI 10.1016/0169-8141(94)00082-E Nijp HH, 2016, CHRONOBIOL INT, V33, P604, DOI 10.3109/07420528.2016.1167731 Ning HS, 2018, IEEE ACCESS, V6, P35501, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848286 Pandve HT, 2017, J ERGON, V7, pe169, DOI [10.4172/2165-7556.1000e169, DOI 10.4172/2165-7556.1000E169] Panjaitan N, 2019, IOP CONF SER-MAT SCI, V505, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012040 Parasuraman R., 2003, THEORETICAL ISSUES E, V4, P5, DOI DOI 10.1080/14639220210199753 Parasuraman R., 2006, NEUROERGONOMICS BRAI, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195177619.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195177619.001.0001] Pickering Andrew, 1995, PERSPECTIVES SCI, V3, P1 Rajendran S., 2021, MEASURE SENS, V15, DOI [10.1016/j.measen.2021.100045, DOI 10.1016/J.MEASEN.2021.100045] Rana Geeta, 2019, Strategic HR Review, V18, P176, DOI 10.1108/SHR-01-2019-0003 Schwab K, 2016, 4 IND REVOLUTION WHA Skobelev PO, 2017, IND 40, V2 Umpleby SA, 2008, ORIGIN CYBERNETICS O Webiran Bulletin, 3 INT IR ERG C SHIR Zink KJ, 2013, ERGONOMICS, V56, P348, DOI 10.1080/00140139.2012.751456 Zunjic A., 2017, IETI T ERGONOMICS SA, V1, P1 NR 48 TC 0 Z9 0 PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA PI LAUSANNE PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND PD NOV 3 PY 2022 VL 10 AR 1012985 DI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1012985 WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ER PT J AU Hung, CL Wu, JH Chen, PY Xu, XY Hsu, WL Lin, LM Hsieh, MC AF Hung, Chih-Lung Wu, Jen-Her Chen, Pei-Yu Xu, Xiaoyu Hsu, Wan-Ling Lin, Li-Min Hsieh, Ming-Che TI Enhancing healthcare services and brand engagement through social media marketing: Integration of Kotler's 5A framework with IDEA process SO INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT LA English DT Article DE Cyberpsychology; 5A framework; IDEA; Content design; Social media marketing; Healthcare marketing ID FAN PAGES; INFORMATION; USER; BENEFITS; SEEKING; IMPACT AB Social media marketing can be an effective solution for healthcare organizations to build longterm relationships with patients. However, previous studies mainly focused on isolated aspects of social media marketing. This lack of integration has limited the development and adoption of social media marketing. This study proposes a social media marketing methodology (SMMM) that incorporates Kotler's 5A consumer experience path with the IDEA (identify, develop, engage, and assess) content marketing process and well-known social media design principles in providing marketing roadmap and content design guidance for implementing social media marketing. Two cases (one for a medical center with 56 posts reaching 101,342 potential clients and another for a postpartum nursing home with 52 posts reaching 61,245 potential clients) are used to examine and evaluate the usability of the methodology. The results show that the engagement rate in both cases is well above the average level in Taiwan, and all users have a positive response to the use of the methodology. These findings support that the methodology provides a nominal process model for implementing social media marketing, facilitates the design of post content, and enhances patient engagement with healthcare brands and services. C1 [Hung, Chih-Lung] EDA Hosp, CAO, Adm Ctr, 1, Yida Rd, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan. [Hung, Chih-Lung] I Shou Univ, Dept Healthcare Adm, 8, Yida Rd, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan. [Wu, Jen-Her] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Southern Taiwan Interdisciplinary Ctr Innovat Tech, Dept Informat Management, 70, Lien-Hai Rd, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan. [Wu, Jen-Her] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, EDA Healthcare Grp, 70, Lien-Hai Rd, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan. [Chen, Pei-Yu] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Informat Management, 70, Lien-Hai Rd, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan. [Xu, Xiaoyu] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Sch Econ & Finance, 74, Yantaxi Rd, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China. [Hsu, Wan-Ling] EDA Hosp, Adm Ctr, Deputy CAO Nursing, 1, Yida Rd, Yanchao Dist, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan, Provinc. [Lin, Li-Min] Meiho Univ, Dept Nursing, 23, Ping Kuang Rd, Pingtung 91202, Taiwan. [Hsieh, Ming-Che] Natl Taitung Univ, Dept Informat Sci & Management Syst, 369, Sec 2, Univ Rd, Taitung 950309, Taiwan. C3 E-Da Hospital; I Shou University; National Sun Yat Sen University; National Sun Yat Sen University; National Sun Yat Sen University; Xi'an Jiaotong University RP Hsieh, MC (corresponding author), Natl Taitung Univ, Dept Informat Sci & Management Syst, 369, Sec 2, Univ Rd, Taitung 950309, Taiwan. EM hmz@nttu.edu.tw FU E-DA Healthcare Group, Taiwan [EDATD107030]; National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan [MOST 105-2410-H-110-072 MY2] FX This research was supported by the E-DA Healthcare Group, Taiwan under operating grant EDATD107030 and was partially supported by the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan under operating grant MOST 105-2410-H-110-072 MY2. CR Antoniadis I, 2019, INT J RETAIL DISTRIB, V47, P957, DOI 10.1108/IJRDM-09-2018-0195 Bansal G, 2010, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V49, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2010.01.010 Carter T., 2022, CONTENT LENGTH WHATS Chawla Y, 2021, J BUS RES, V135, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.020 Chen SQ, 2020, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102253 Colicev A, 2019, INT J RES MARK, V36, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.09.005 CopyPress, 2021, COMPL GUID SOC MED E Day S., 2019, DIGITAL HLTH CONSUME de Vries L, 2012, J INTERACT MARK, V26, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003 Dean B., 2019, WE ANAL 912 MILLION Dolega L, 2021, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102501 Farsi D, 2021, J MED INTERNET RES, V23, DOI 10.2196/23205 Felix R, 2017, J BUS RES, V70, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.001 Coelho RLF, 2016, ONLINE INFORM REV, V40, P458, DOI 10.1108/OIR-06-2015-0176 Goh KY, 2013, INFORM SYST RES, V24, P88, DOI 10.1287/isre.1120.0469 Heston J., 2022, INTERGROWTH Ho J, 2020, J RES INTERACT MARK, V14, P133, DOI 10.1108/JRIM-06-2018-0082 Holliman G, 2014, J RES INTERACT MARK, V8, P269, DOI 10.1108/JRIM-02-2014-0013 Jabarulla MY, 2021, HEALTHCARE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/healthcare9081019 Jalal AN, 2021, HELIYON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06913 Jang S, 2018, J BUS RES, V92, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.056 Jarvinen J, 2016, IND MARKET MANAG, V54, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.07.002 Kang J, 2014, INT J HOSP MANAG, V36, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.08.015 Kee A. W. A., 2015, INT J MANAGEMENT ACC, V2, P1055 Kemp S., GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPO Kendall, 2021, EV Khan S., 2020, P ADV SCI ENG TECHN, P1, DOI 10.1109/iCoMET48670.2020.9074068 Kim JH, 2019, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V56, P1494, DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2018.10.018 Kim SC, 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106428 Kotler P., 2016, MARKETING 4 0 MOVING Latimer T, 2017, J ROY SOC MED, V110, P425, DOI 10.1177/0141076817731905 Li YB, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V126, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.021 Li Y, 2022, J BUS RES, V150, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.085 Lin KY, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1152, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009 Lin XL, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120574 Marzouk O., 2022, DATA INFORM MANAGEME, V6 McLachlan S., 2022, HOOTSUITE Moeller S., 2017, BUZZSUMO Morgan NA, 2019, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V47, P4, DOI 10.1007/s11747-018-0598-1 Muntinga DG, 2011, INT J ADVERT, V30, P13, DOI 10.2501/IJA-30-1-013-046 Neal Matthew T, 2021, Surg Neurol Int, V12, P35, DOI 10.25259/SNI_8_2021 Neuendorf K. A., 2017, CONTENT ANAL GUIDEBO Oeldorf-Hirsch A, 2019, HEALTH COMMUN, V34, P1130, DOI 10.1080/10410236.2018.1465791 Peffers K, 2007, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V24, P45, DOI 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302 Pereira M., 2021, SPICEWORKS Phillip R., 2016, SOCIALBAKERS Porterfield A., 2012, SOCIAL MEDIA EXAMINE Pratt MG, 2008, ORGAN RES METHODS, V11, P481, DOI 10.1177/1094428107303349 Richter Jason P, 2020, Health Mark Q, V37, P1, DOI 10.1080/07359683.2020.1713573 Shang LL, 2019, J MED INTERNET RES, V21, DOI 10.2196/13940 Shi Y. J., 2015, IN PRACTICE Shulman JD, 2019, INFORM SYST RES, V30, P856, DOI 10.1287/isre.2019.0835 Smith P. R., 2013, EMARKETING EXCELLENC Stelzner M. A., 2011, LAUNCH QUICKLY PROPE Strauss A., 1998, BASICS QUALITATIVE R Sweeney J, 2014, EUR J MARKETING, V48, P336, DOI 10.1108/EJM-06-2012-0336 Think Marketing, 2013, THINK MARKETING Wang FH, 2021, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102632 Wang YN, 2020, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102272 Wickremsinhe E., 2022, APPL CLIN TRIALS, P20 Wirtz J, 2013, J SERV MANAGE, V24, P223, DOI 10.1108/09564231311326978 Wong CA, 2016, HEALTHCARE-J DEL SCI, V4, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.12.004 Wu J.-. H., 2022, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER Yang HZ, 2021, INTERNET RES, V31, P2190, DOI 10.1108/INTR-09-2020-0501 Yang R, 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106376 Yellowdig, 2022, PINN TOP Zhang JH, 2021, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102716 Zhao YH, 2017, HEALTH INFO LIBR J, V34, P268, DOI 10.1111/hir.12192 Zimmerman MS, 2020, HEALTH INFO LIBR J, V37, P173, DOI 10.1111/hir.12287 NR 69 TC 0 Z9 0 PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND PD JUL PY 2023 VL 60 IS 4 AR 103379 DI 10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103379 EA APR 2023 WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science SC Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science ER PT J AU Kuss, DJ Shorter, GW van Rooij, AJ Griffiths, MD Schoenmakers, TM AF Kuss, Daria J. Shorter, Gillian W. van Rooij, Antonius J. Griffiths, Mark D. Schoenmakers, Tim M. TI Assessing Internet Addiction Using the Parsimonious Internet Addiction Components Model-A Preliminary Study SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION LA English DT Article DE Internet addiction; Behavioural addiction; Addiction components; Classification; Diagnosis ID VIDEO-GAMING DISORDER; DRUG-ABUSE; PSYCHIATRIC-SYMPTOMS; PREVALENCE; ADOLESCENTS; ASSOCIATIONS; POPULATION; STUDENTS; SYSTEMS; SCALE AB Internet usage has grown exponentially over the last decade. Research indicates that excessive Internet use can lead to symptoms associated with addiction. To date, assessment of potential Internet addiction has varied regarding populations studied and instruments used, making reliable prevalence estimations difficult. To overcome the present problems a preliminary study was conducted testing a parsimonious Internet addiction components model based on Griffiths' addiction components (Journal of Substance Use, 10, 191-197, 2005), including salience, mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal, conflict, and relapse. Two validated measures of Internet addiction were used (Compulsive Internet Use Scale [CIUS], Meerkerk et al. in Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 1-6, 2009, and Assessment for Internet and Computer Game Addiction Scale [AICA-S], Wolfling et al. 2010) in two independent samples (ns = 3,105 and 2,257). The fit of the model was analysed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Results indicate that the Internet addiction components model fits the data in both samples well. The two sample/two instrument approach provides converging evidence concerning the degree to which the components model can organize the self-reported behavioural components of Internet addiction. Recommendations for future research include a more detailed assessment of tolerance as addiction component. C1 [Kuss, Daria J.] Birmingham City Univ, Birmingham B42 2SU, W Midlands, England. [Shorter, Gillian W.] Univ Ulster, Bamford Ctr Mental Hlth & Wellbeing, Londonderry BT48 7JL, North Ireland. [Shorter, Gillian W.] Univ Ulster, MRC All Ireland Trials Methodol Hub, Londonderry BT48 7JL, North Ireland. [van Rooij, Antonius J.; Schoenmakers, Tim M.] IVO Addict Res Inst, NL-3021 DM Rotterdam, Netherlands. [van Rooij, Antonius J.; Schoenmakers, Tim M.] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands. [Griffiths, Mark D.] Nottingham Trent Univ, Int Gaming Res Unit, Nottingham NG1 4GN, England. C3 Birmingham City University; Ulster University; Ulster University; Erasmus University Rotterdam; Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam - Excl Erasmus MC; Nottingham Trent University RP Kuss, DJ (corresponding author), Birmingham City Univ, City North Campus, Birmingham B42 2SU, W Midlands, England. EM daria.kuss@yahoo.com; gw.shorter@ulster.ac.uk; rooij@ivo.nl; mark.griffiths@ntu.ac.uk; Schoenmakers@ivo.nl CR Aboujaoude E, 2006, CNS SPECTRUMS, V11, P750, DOI 10.1017/S1092852900014875 American Psychiatric Association, 2012, DSM 5 DEV American Psychiatric Association, 2022, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, V5th ed American Psychiatric Association, 2000, AM PSYCHIATRIC ASS, V4, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-1-4377-2242-0.00016-X Andreassen CS, 2012, PSYCHOL REP, V110, P501, DOI 10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517 Andreassen CS, 2012, SCAND J PSYCHOL, V53, P265, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x Andrews-Hanna JR, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021598 Armstrong L, 2000, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V53, P537, DOI 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0400 Beard KW, 2005, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V8, P7, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.7 Blaszczynski A., 2006, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V4, P7, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11469-006-9002-3 Blum K, 1996, AM SCI, V84, P132 Boomsma A, 2000, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V7, P461, DOI 10.1207/S15328007SEM0703_6 Brown T., 2015, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR, VSecond Cao H, 2011, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-802 Christakis DA, 2010, BMC MED, V8, DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-8-61 Clark M, 2008, ADDICT RES THEORY, V16, P633, DOI 10.1080/16066350801890050 COHEN J, 1992, PSYCHOL BULL, V112, P155, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 Conner BT, 1999, EXP CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V7, P64, DOI 10.1037/1064-1297.7.1.64 Dong GH, 2011, NEUROSCI LETT, V499, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.047 El-Guebaly N, 2006, J GAMBL STUD, V22, P275, DOI 10.1007/s10899-006-9016-6 Flora DB, 2004, PSYCHOL METHODS, V9, P466, DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466 Glasner-Edwards S, 2010, HEALTH POLICY, V97, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.013 Gray L., 2010, TEACHERS USE ED TECH GRIFFITHS M, 1993, ADDICT BEHAV, V18, P365, DOI 10.1016/0306-4603(93)90038-B Griffiths M. D., 2005, J SUBST USE, V10, P191, DOI DOI 10.1080/14659890500114359 Griffiths MD, 2010, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V8, P119, DOI 10.1007/s11469-009-9229-x Griffiths MD, 2005, BRIT J SPORT MED, V39, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2004.017020 Hayduk LA, 2000, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V7, P1, DOI 10.1207/S15328007SEM0701_01 Hellman M., 2012, ADDICTION RES THEORY Hooper D, 2008, ELECT J BUSINESS RES, V6, P53, DOI [DOI 10.21427/D7CF7R, 10.21427/D7CF7R] Hu LT, 1999, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/10705519909540118 International Telecommunication Union, 2012, INT US Joreskog K.G., 2005, STRUCTURAL EQUATION Kaltiala-Heino R, 2004, ADDICT RES THEORY, V12, P89, DOI 10.1080/1606635031000098796 King DL, 2013, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V47, P875, DOI 10.1177/0004867413495925 Ko CH, 2009, ARCH PEDIAT ADOL MED, V163, P937, DOI 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.159 Koob GF, 1997, SCIENCE, V278, P52, DOI 10.1126/science.278.5335.52 Kuss D. J., 2012, ADDICT RES THER, VS6, pe001 Kuss DJ, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P1987, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.002 Kuss DJ, 2012, BRAIN SCI, V2, P347, DOI 10.3390/brainsci2030347 Kuss DJ, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P959, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.024 Kuss DJ, 2012, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V10, P278, DOI 10.1007/s11469-011-9318-5 Larkin M, 2002, ADDICT RES THEORY, V10, P281, DOI 10.1080/16066350211866 Lemmens JS, 2009, MEDIA PSYCHOL, V12, P77, DOI 10.1080/15213260802669458 Leung L, 2012, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V30, P403, DOI 10.1177/0894439311435217 Lin FC, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030253 Littel M, 2012, ADDICT BIOL, V17, P934, DOI 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00467.x Little R, 2002, STAT ANAL MISSING DA Liu CY, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P799, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9951 Liu J, 2010, CHINESE MED J-PEKING, V123, P1904, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2010.14.014 Lopez-Moreno JA, 2008, ADDICT BIOL, V13, P160, DOI 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00105.x MACCALLUM R, 1986, PSYCHOL BULL, V100, P107, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.107 McLellan AT, 2004, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V56, P764, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.06.018 Meerkerk GJ, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P1, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0181 Muller KW, 2012, Z KINDER JUG-PSYCH, V40, P331, DOI 10.1024/1422-4917/a000190 Murali V, 2007, ADV PSYCHIAT TREATME, V13, P24, DOI DOI 10.1192/APT.BP.106.002907 Muthen B, 2002, MPLUS WEB NOTES, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10519-008-9237-9 Muthen B.O., 2007, MPLUS USERS GUIDE, V6th ed. Muthen L. K., 2012, MODEL FIT INDEX WRMR Nichols LA, 2004, PSYCHOL ADDICT BEHAV, V18, P381, DOI 10.1037/0893-164X.18.4.381 Niemz K, 2005, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V8, P562, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.562 Paulhus DL., 2007, HDB RES METHODS PERS, V1, P224, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0022-1910(03)00003-9 Pies Ronald, 2009, Psychiatry (Edgmont), V6, P31 Rumpf H-J., 2011, PRAVALENZ INTERNETAB Shaffer HJ, 2004, HARVARD REV PSYCHIAT, V12, P367, DOI 10.1080/10673220490905705 Shaffer HJ, 2000, AM J ORTHOPSYCHIAT, V70, P162, DOI 10.1037/h0087741 Smith G. W., 2001, DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEN, V113, P222 SOLOMON RL, 1980, AM PSYCHOL, V35, P691, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.35.8.691 Starcevic V, 2013, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V47, P285, DOI 10.1177/0004867413476145 Steiger JH, 2007, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V42, P893, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017 Steiger JH, 2000, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V7, P149, DOI 10.1207/S15328007SEM0702_1 Treuer T, 2001, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V66, P283, DOI 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00261-5 Tsai CC, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P649, DOI 10.1089/109493103322725432 van Rooij AJ, 2011, ADDICTION, V106, P205, DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03104.x Volkow ND, 2003, J CLIN INVEST, V111, P1444, DOI 10.1172/JCI200318533 Volkow ND, 2007, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V64, P1575, DOI 10.1001/archneur.64.11.1575 Wolfling K, 2010, PREVENTION DIAGNOSTI, P212 World Health Organization, 1992, ICD 10 CLASS MENT BE Yen JY, 2007, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V41, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.02.002 Young K. S., 1999, INNOVATIONS CLIN PRA, V17, P19, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10879-009-9120-X Young K, 2010, WORLD PSYCHIATRY, V9, P91 Young KS, 2004, AM BEHAV SCI, V48, P402, DOI 10.1177/0002764204270278 Yuen CN, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P379, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.379 NR 83 TC 66 Z9 67 PU SPRINGER PI NEW YORK PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES PD JUN PY 2014 VL 12 IS 3 BP 351 EP 366 DI 10.1007/s11469-013-9459-9 WC Psychology, Clinical; Substance Abuse; Psychiatry SC Psychology; Substance Abuse; Psychiatry ER PT J AU Ostovar, S Bagheri, R Griffiths, MD Hashima, IHM AF Ostovar, Shahla Bagheri, Reyhaneh Griffiths, Mark D. Hashima, Intan Hashimah Mohd TI Internet addiction and maladaptive schemas: The potential role of disconnection/rejection and impaired autonomy/performance SO CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY LA English DT Article DE disconnection; impaired autonomy; internet addiction; maladaptive schemas; problematic internet use; rejection ID COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL MODEL; PERSONALITY-DISORDER; SYMPTOMS; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE; ATTACHMENT; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY; STRESS; ONLINE AB Introduction and objectives Problematic internet use (PIU) has become public health concern, particularly among adolescents and emerging adults. There is growing interest concerning the potential impacts of early maladaptive schemas (EMSs) on PIU and its most severe manifestation internet addiction (IA). However, a deeper understanding of these relationships is needed regarding of effects of schemas on IA. The purpose of the present study was to explore the role of EMSs among adults. Methods The sample comprised 714 Iranian participants who completed a self-report survey comprising sociodemographic variables, the Internet Addiction Test (IAT), and the Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form (YSQ-SF). The data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Results Findings indicated that there was a positive and significant relationship between EMS domains and IA. The results confirmed that disconnection/rejection schema domains and impaired autonomy/performance schema domains were significantly related with IA. The results of the analysis of convergent validity and discriminant validity were acceptable among the nine reflective constructs. Conclusion Findings of the present study indicated that existence of underlying EMSs may be a vulnerability factor for developing IA and adds to the growing body of cyberpsychology literature that has examined the relationships between the EMSs and IA. C1 [Ostovar, Shahla; Hashima, Intan Hashimah Mohd] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Social Sci, George Town, Malaysia. [Bagheri, Reyhaneh] Univ Sains Malaysia, Ctr Res Women & Gender KANITA, George Town, Malaysia. [Griffiths, Mark D.] Nottingham Trent Univ, Psychol Dept, 50 Shakespeare St, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, England. C3 Universiti Sains Malaysia; Universiti Sains Malaysia; Nottingham Trent University RP Griffiths, MD (corresponding author), Nottingham Trent Univ, Psychol Dept, 50 Shakespeare St, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, England. EM mark.griffiths@ntu.ac.uk CR Alimoradi Z, 2019, SLEEP MED REV, V47, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.06.004 Aloi M, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03022 Dos Santos MA, 2016, PSYCHOL MARKET, V33, P1091, DOI 10.1002/mar.20943 Arpaci I, 2021, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V19, P778, DOI 10.1007/s11469-019-00186-y Astrachan CB, 2014, J FAM BUS STRATEG, V5, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.12.002 Bach B, 2017, EUR J PSYCHOL ASSESS, V33, P134, DOI 10.1027/1015-5759/a000272 Bach B, 2016, J PERS DISORD, V30, P502, DOI 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_212 Bakhshi Bojed Fereshteh, 2013, Int J High Risk Behav Addict, V2, P72, DOI 10.5812/ijhrba.10148 Baldwin G., 1999, FACILITIES, V17, P54, DOI [10.1108/02632779910248884, DOI 10.1108/02632779910248884] Barazandeh H, 2016, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V94, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.021 Beck A. T., 1987, J COGN PSYCHOTHER, V1, P5 Blissett J, 2006, CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, V13, P163, DOI 10.1002/cpp.482 Brand M, 2016, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V71, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033 Brand M, 2014, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00375 Caplan SE, 2002, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V18, P553, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00004-3 Carr SN, 2010, PSYCHOL PSYCHOTHER-T, V83, P333, DOI 10.1348/147608309X481351 Chang YH, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16193537 Chen IH, 2020, J BEHAV ADDICT, V9, P410, DOI 10.1556/2006.2020.00023 Chi XL, 2020, ADDICT BEHAV, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106385 Chodkiewicz J, 2018, ALCOHOL ALCOHOLISM, V53, P682, DOI 10.1093/alcalc/agy047 Choudhary S, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00714 Cohen LJ, 2016, PSYCHIAT RES, V242, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.007 Crocetta C, 2021, SOC INDIC RES, V154, P725, DOI 10.1007/s11205-020-02563-w Dalbudak E, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P272, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0390 Davis RA, 2001, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V17, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8 Demir Y., 2018, INT ONLINE J ED SCI, V10, DOI [10.15345/iojes.2018.05.020, DOI 10.15345/IOJES.2018.05.020] Dijkstra TK, 2015, MIS QUART, V39, P297, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02 Douglas AC, 2008, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V24, P3027, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.009 Estevez A, 2019, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE, V34, P763, DOI 10.1177/0886260516645815 Feng YH, 2019, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02248 Flink N, 2018, CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, V25, P532, DOI 10.1002/cpp.2188 Gackenbach, 1998, PSYCHOL INTERNET INT, P61 Gamez-Guadix M, 2013, PSICOTHEMA, V25, P299, DOI 10.7334/psicothema2012.274 Gervasi AM, 2017, CLIN NEUROPSYCHIATR, V14, P20 Gholamian B, 2017, INT J PEDIATR-MASSHA, V5, P4763, DOI 10.22038/ijp.2017.22516.1883 Gold AH, 2001, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V18, P185, DOI 10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669 Gomez-Odriozola J, 2020, MINDFULNESS, V11, P1943, DOI 10.1007/s12671-020-01402-w Griffiths M, 2000, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V3, P211, DOI 10.1089/109493100316067 Griffiths M., 1995, FORUM, V76, P14 Griffiths M. D., 2005, J SUBST USE, V10, P191, DOI DOI 10.1080/14659890500114359 Griffiths M.D., 2016, AUSTR CLIN PSYCHOL, V2, P20108 Griffiths MD, 2004, ADDICT RES THEORY, V12, P99, DOI 10.1080/1606635042000193211 Griffiths MD., 1996, CLIN PSYCHOL FORUM, V97, P32, DOI DOI 10.53841/BPSCPF.1996.1.97.32 Griffiths MD., 1999, STUDENT BRIT MED J, V7, P428 Hair J., 2007, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN Hair J., 2017, PRIMER PARTIAL LEAST, VSecond Hair J. F, 2006, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN Hair JF, 2011, J MARKET THEORY PRAC, V19, P139, DOI 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202 Harris AE, 2002, COGNITIVE THER RES, V26, P405, DOI 10.1023/A:1016085112981 Hassan T, 2020, J EGYPT PUBLIC HEAL, V95, DOI 10.1186/s42506-019-0032-7 Hayes AF, 2020, COMMUN METHODS MEAS, V14, P1, DOI 10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629 Henseler J, 2016, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V116, P2, DOI 10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382 Henseler J, 2015, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V43, P115, DOI 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 Hussain Z., 2018, PSYCHOL SOCIAL CULTU, P45, DOI [10.4018/978-1-5225-3477-8.ch003, DOI 10.4018/978-1-5225-3477-8.CH003] International Telecommunication Union, 2016, FACTS FIGURES 2016 Internet World Stats, 2019, INTERNET USERS STAT Janovsky T, 2020, CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, V27, P408, DOI 10.1002/cpp.2439 Jiang QL, 2014, INTERNET RES, V24, P2, DOI 10.1108/IntR-01-2013-0004 Karami Z., 2015, IRANIAN REHABILITATI, V13, P10 Kline R.B., 2016, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE Kojima R, 2019, PSYCHIAT CLIN NEUROS, V73, P20, DOI 10.1111/pcn.12791 Kunst H, 2020, CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, V27, P837, DOI 10.1002/cpp.2467 Lee SY, 2019, CURR ADDICT REP, V6, P303, DOI 10.1007/s40429-019-00265-z Leung H, 2020, ADDICT BEHAV, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.027 Li YY, 2020, INT J PHYTOREMEDIAT, V22, P451, DOI 10.1080/15226514.2019.1671796 Lu WH, 2017, J BEHAV ADDICT, V6, P434, DOI 10.1556/2006.6.2017.053 Marengo SM, 2019, J ADULT DEV, V26, P190, DOI 10.1007/s10804-018-9313-1 Meerkerk GJ, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P1, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0181 Montag C, 2015, ASIA-PAC PSYCHIAT, V7, P20, DOI 10.1111/appy.12122 Nordahl D, 2019, BMC PSYCHOL, V7, DOI 10.1186/s40359-019-0297-9 Nordahl H.M., 2012, MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS Nunnally J. C., 1994, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY Ostovar S, 2016, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V14, P257, DOI 10.1007/s11469-015-9628-0 Ozturk C, 2015, ASIAN NURS RES, V9, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.anr.2015.01.001 Parke J., 2006, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V4, P151, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-006-9014-z, DOI 10.1007/S11469-006-9014-Z] Petry NM, 2014, ADDICTION, V109, P1399, DOI 10.1111/add.12457 Pontes HM, 2017, ADDICT BEHAV, V64, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.09.003 Pontes Halley M, 2015, Addict Behav Rep, V1, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.03.002 Riso LP, 2006, COGNITIVE THER RES, V30, P515, DOI 10.1007/s10608-006-9015-z Robles-Diaz M, 2015, LIVER INT, V35, P2474, DOI 10.1111/liv.12834 Ruiz-Mafe C, 2006, INTERNET RES, V16, P380, DOI 10.1108/10662240610690016 Ryu E, 2011, BEHAV RES METHODS, V43, P1066, DOI 10.3758/s13428-011-0115-7 Saddichha S, 2012, J RES MED SCI, V17, P523 Samaha AA, 2018, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00365 Shaghaghy Farhad, 2011, Addict Health, V3, P45 Shajari F, 2016, ASIAN J PHARM RES HE, V8, P84, DOI 10.18311/ajprhc/2016/4334 Shapira NA, 2003, DEPRESS ANXIETY, V17, P207, DOI 10.1002/da.10094 Sharma Arvind, 2018, J Family Med Prim Care, V7, P147, DOI 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_189_17 Shi M, 2019, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12888-019-2173-9 Shorey RC, 2015, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V83, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.040 Simard V, 2011, PSYCHOL PSYCHOTHER-T, V84, P349, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8341.2010.02009.x Simpson S, 2019, CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, V26, P35, DOI 10.1002/cpp.2328 Sunde T, 2019, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12888-019-2285-2 Tao R, 2010, ADDICTION, V105, P556, DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02828.x Taymur I, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V61, P532, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.043 Tezel FK, 2015, NOROPSIKIYATRI ARS, V52, P226, DOI 10.5152/npa.2015.7118 Tonioni F, 2012, GEN HOSP PSYCHIAT, V34, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.09.013 Wafae IS, 2018, EUR J INVEST HEALTH, V8, P185 Wallace AE, 2010, J ENDOCRINOL, V206, P141, DOI 10.1677/JOE-10-0072 Wiederhold BK, 2017, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V20, P1, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2016.29059.bkw Wong HY, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17061879 Xin Miao, 2018, Addict Behav Rep, V7, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.abrep.2017.10.003 Yarahmadi S., 2020, IRANIAN REHABILITATI, V18, P163 Young J., 1990, COGNITIVE THERAPY PE Young J. E., 2003, SCHEMA THERAPY PRACT Young K. S., 1998, CAUGHT NET RECOGNIZE Young K.S., 2003, ANN M AM PSYCH ASS T Yount KM, 2010, SEX ROLES, V63, P332, DOI 10.1007/s11199-010-9793-3 Zadra S, 2016, J BEHAV ADDICT, V5, P691, DOI 10.1556/2006.5.2016.086 Zamirinejad S, 2018, AM J MENS HEALTH, V12, P202, DOI 10.1177/1557988317742230 NR 110 TC 6 Z9 6 PU WILEY PI HOBOKEN PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA PD NOV PY 2021 VL 28 IS 6 SI SI BP 1509 EP 1524 DI 10.1002/cpp.2581 EA MAR 2021 WC Psychology, Clinical SC Psychology ER PT J AU Schoenmakers, K Greene, D Stutterheim, S Lin, H Palmer, MJ AF Schoenmakers, Koen Greene, Daniel Stutterheim, Sarah Lin, Herbert Palmer, Megan J. TI The security mindset: characteristics, development, and consequences SO JOURNAL OF CYBERSECURITY LA English DT Article DE security mindset; cybersecurity; management; awareness; psychology; cyberpsychology; motivation; culture ID SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; MOTIVATION; CULTURE; MINDFULNESS; PERFORMANCE; STUDENTS; AUTONOMY; WORLD; RISK; RACE AB The world is facing a cybersecurity skills gap as cybercrime and cyberwarfare grow in importance. One often-discussed quality that is potentially relevant to cybersecurity recruitment and education is the so-called "security mindset": a way of thinking characteristic of some security professionals that they believe to be especially advantageous in their work. Although some employers express a desire to hire people with a security mindset, and initiatives to cultivate the security mindset are being implemented, it has no common definition and little is known about its characteristics, its development, and its consequences. We interviewed 21 cybersecurity professionals who strongly identified as having a security mindset based on a minimal description drawn from existing literature. Thematic analysis of the interview data suggests that the security mindset can be conceptualized as consisting of three interconnected aspects-"monitoring" for potential security anomalies, "investigating" anomalies more deeply to identify security flaws, and "evaluating" the relevance of those flaws in a larger context. These three aspects develop in different ways and have different personal and professional consequences. Participants mostly spoke positively of the security mindset, but they also mentioned several disadvantages not mentioned by existing security-mindset literature, such as mental health pressures, workplace tensions, and negative effects on personal relationships. We discuss the implications of these findings for future study of the security mindset and suggest practical implications for cybersecurity management, education, and recruitment. C1 [Schoenmakers, Koen] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA. [Greene, Daniel] Gryphon Sci LLC, 6930 Carroll Ave, Takoma Pk, MD 20912 USA. [Greene, Daniel] Stanford Univ, Ctr Int Secur & Cooperat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA. [Stutterheim, Sarah] Maastricht Univ, Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands. [Stutterheim, Sarah] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Hlth Promot, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands. [Lin, Herbert] Stanford Univ, Ctr Int Secur & Cooperat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA. [Palmer, Megan J.] Stanford Univ, Dept Bioengn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA. [Palmer, Megan J.] Stanford Univ, Ctr Int Secur & Cooperat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA. [Greene, Daniel] 6930 Carroll Ave,Suite 810, Takoma Pk, MD 20912 USA. C3 Harvard University; Stanford University; Maastricht University; Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC); Maastricht University; Stanford University; Stanford University; Stanford University RP Greene, D (corresponding author), 6930 Carroll Ave,Suite 810, Takoma Pk, MD 20912 USA. EM dgreene@gryphonscientific.com CR AlHogail A., 2014, 2014 WORLD C COMP AP, P1 Alshaikh M, 2020, COMPUT SECUR, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2020.102003 Beilock SL, 2001, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V130, P701, DOI 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.701 Bergen N, 2020, QUAL HEALTH RES, V30, P783, DOI 10.1177/1049732319889354 Blum SC, 2014, SOC COGNITION, V32, P297, DOI 10.1521/soco.2014.32.3.297 Boddy CR, 2016, QUAL MARK RES, V19, P426, DOI 10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053 Bonver E, 2008, IEEE SECUR PRIV, V6, P82, DOI 10.1109/MSP.2008.115 Braun V., 2012, APA HDB RES METHODS, V2, P57, DOI [DOI 10.1037/13620-004, 10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_103-1] Braun V., 2006, QUALITATIVE RES PSYC, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA] Briggs P, 2017, BEHAVIOR CHANGE RESEARCH AND THEORY: PSYCHOLOGICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES, P115, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-802690-8.00004-9 Brooks R, 2012, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT, P541, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_26 Brown KW, 2007, PSYCHOL INQ, V18, P211, DOI 10.1080/10478400701598298 Burrell DN., 2018, INT J HYPERCONNECT I, V2, P29 Caloyannides MA., 2004, IEEE SECUR PRIV, V2, P87 Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, 2020, WORKFORCE DEV CURRIC Cappos J, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (SIGCSE'14), P523, DOI 10.1145/2538862.2538939 Chen Y, 2021, INFORM SYST RES, V32, P1043, DOI 10.1287/isre.2021.1014 Conti G, 2011, IEEE SECUR PRIV, V9, P48, DOI 10.1109/MSP.2011.80 Cook CL, 2018, GROUP PROCESS INTERG, V21, P584, DOI 10.1177/1368430216670024 Creswell JD, 2017, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V68, P491, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-042716-051139 Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, 2020, CYB WORKF DEV RES da Veiga A, 2020, COMPUT SECUR, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101713 Deci EL, 2008, CAN PSYCHOL, V49, P182, DOI 10.1037/a0012801 Dutton W, 2017, INTERNET POLICY REV, V6, DOI 10.14763/2017.1.443 Dweck C. S., 2017, MINDSET CHANGING WAY Emsi, 2020, BUILD DONT BUY SKILL Esin JO., 2020, J WOMEN MINOR TECHNO, V2, P1 French RP, 2016, INT J ORGAN ANAL, V24, P673, DOI 10.1108/IJOA-09-2014-0797 Gollwitzer P.M., 1990, HDB MOTIVATION COGNI, V2, P53 Gollwitzer PM, 1999, DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, P403 Grossman LtColD, 2012, COMBAT PSYCHOL PHYSL Gupta AK, 2002, ACAD MANAGE EXEC, V16, P116, DOI 10.5465/AME.2002.6640211 Haney JM, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH SYMPOSIUM ON USABLE PRIVACY AND SECURITY, P357 Henrich J, 2015, CURR OPIN BEHAV SCI, V3, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.001 Hooshangi S., 2015, P 46 ACM TECHNICAL S, P404 International Computer Science Institute, 2022, IEEE T ENG MANAGE Joint Task Force on Cybersecurity Education, 2017, CYB CURR 2017 CURR G Kam HJ, 2022, INFORM SYST J, V32, P888, DOI 10.1111/isj.12374 Kam HJ, 2020, COMPUT SECUR, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101875 Konstantinou D, 2021, EDUC MEDIA INT, V58, P223, DOI 10.1080/09523987.2021.1976826 Kool W, 2016, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005090 Krumpal I, 2013, QUAL QUANT, V47, P2025, DOI 10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9 Kusurkar RA, 2011, MED TEACH, V33, P978, DOI 10.3109/0142159X.2011.599896 Markus HR, 2016, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V8, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.028 Marsh J, 2019, MIND CULT ACT, V26, P221, DOI 10.1080/10749039.2019.1655651 McDonald Nora, 2019, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, V3, DOI 10.1145/3359174 Miller VA, 2009, J EMPIR RES HUM RES, V4, P21, DOI 10.1525/jer.2009.4.3.21 Morgan S., 2021, CYBERSECURITY VENTUR, P1 Morris EW, 2017, SOCIOL EDUC, V90, P127, DOI 10.1177/0038040717694876 Naden C., 2021, CYBERSECURITY SKILLS Nassiokas T., 2022, SECURITY MINDSET WHA National Initiative for Cybersecurity Careers and Studies, 2022, CYB WORKF DEV TOOLK Nel F, 2019, INF COMPUT SECUR, V27, P146, DOI 10.1108/ICS-12-2016-0095 Niemiec CP, 2009, THEORY RES EDUC, V7, P133, DOI 10.1177/1477878509104318 OToole B., 2022, BUILD SECURITY MINDS Padmanabhan A, 2018, IEEE INT WORK SIGN P, P681 Peacock D., 2017, GST, V9, P25 PERLMUTTER HV, 1969, COLUMBIA J WORLD BUS, V4, P9 Peslak A., 2019, IIS, V2, P67, DOI [10.48009/2_iis_2019_62-72, DOI 10.48009/2_IIS_2019_62-72] Petersen Rodney, 2020, WORKFORCE FRAMEWORK, DOI [10.6028/NIST.SP.800-181r1, DOI 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-181R1] Potter B, 2004, IEEE SECUR PRIV, V2, P81, DOI 10.1109/MSP.2004.84 Pournaghshband V., 2013, P 44 ACM TECHN S COM, P1 Ramirez G, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P211, DOI 10.1126/science.1199427 Reeves A, 2021, COMPUT SECUR, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102281 RHINESMITH SH, 1992, TRAINING DEV, V46, P63 Rinner MTB., 2020, AM J MED GENET B, V1st ed., P9 Rosso C., 2021, DARK READING Schneier B., 2008, SCHNEIER ON SECURITY Severance C, 2016, COMPUTER, V49, P7, DOI 10.1109/MC.2016.38 Sjoberg L, 1998, RISK ANAL, V18, P85, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00918.x Skiba R.J., 2002, URBAN REV, V34, P317, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1021320817372, 10.1023/A:1021320817372] Smith J. Darby, 2020, ICONS 2020: International Conference on Neuromorphic Systems 2020, DOI 10.1145/3407197.3407202 Sommestad T, 2015, INT J INF SECUR PRIV, V9, P26, DOI 10.4018/IJISP.2015010102 Stroebe W, 2017, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V43, P1071, DOI 10.1177/0146167217703952 Tanczer LM, 2020, CONTEMP SECUR POL, V41, P108, DOI 10.1080/13523260.2019.1669336 Thomas DR, 2017, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V14, P23, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2016.1219435 Tripwire, 2022, SECURITY MINDSET KEY Vance A, 2012, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V49, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2012.04.002 Vogel R, 2016, SALUS J, V4, P32 Votipka D, 2020, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'20), DOI 10.1145/3313831.3376754 Walton G.M., 2020, HDB WISE INTERVENTIO, P36 Walton GM, 2007, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V92, P82, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82 Waltz CF., 2017, MEASUREMENT NURSING, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1002 Wood W, 2016, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V67, P289, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417 Xiao S., 2014, P 17 ACM C COMPUTER, P1095, DOI DOI 10.1145/2531602.2531722 Xie J, 2011, S VIS LANG HUM CEN C, P161, DOI 10.1109/VLHCC.2011.6070393 Yeager D., 2013, PRACTICAL MEASUREMEN Younas A, 2018, NURSE RES, V26, P14, DOI 10.7748/nr.2018.e1585 NR 88 TC 0 Z9 0 PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS PI OXFORD PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND PD JAN 5 PY 2023 VL 9 IS 1 AR tyad010 DI 10.1093/cybsec/tyad010 WC Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary SC Social Sciences - Other Topics ER PT J AU Carbonell, X Guardiola, E Beranuy, M Belles, A AF Carbonell, Xavier Guardiola, Elena Beranuy, Marta Belles, Ana TI A bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature on Internet, video games, and cell phone addiction SO JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION LA English DT Article ID STUDENTS; DISORDER AB Objectives: The aim of this study was to locate the scientific literature dealing with addiction to the Internet, video games, and cell phones and to characterize the pattern of publications in these areas. Methods: One hundred seventy-nine valid articles were retrieved from PubMed and PsycINFO between 1996 and 2005 related to pathological Internet, cell phone, or video game use. Results: The years with the highest numbers of articles published were 2004 (n=42) and 2005 (n=40). The most productive countries, in terms of number of articles published, were the United States (n=52), China (n=23), the United Kingdom (n=17), Taiwan (n=13), and South Korea (n=9). The most commonly used language was English (65.4%), followed by Chinese (12.8%) and Spanish (4.5%). Articles were published in 96 different journals, of which 22 published 2 or more articles. The journal that published the most articles was Cyberpsychology & Behavior (n=41). Addiction to the Internet was the most intensely studied (85.3%), followed by addiction to video games (13.6%) and cell phones (2.1%). Conclusions: The number of publications in this area is growing, but it is difficult to conduct precise searches due to a lack of clear terminology. To facilitate retrieval, bibliographic databases should include descriptor terms referring specifically to Internet, video games, and cell phone addiction as well as to more general addictions involving communications and information technologies and other behavioral addictions. C1 [Carbonell, Xavier; Beranuy, Marta] Univ Ramon Llull, FPCEE Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain. [Guardiola, Elena] Bayer HealthCare, Documentat Serv, Barcelona, Spain. [Belles, Ana] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. C3 Universitat Ramon Llull; Bayer AG; Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals; Pompeu Fabra University RP Carbonell, X (corresponding author), Univ Ramon Llull, FPCEE Blanquerna, C Cister 34, Barcelona, Spain. EM xaviercs@blanquerna.url.edu; elena.guardiola@bayerhealthcare.com; martabf0@blanquerna.url.edu; ana.belles@upf.edu CR ALEIXANDRE BR, 2000, ADICCIONES, V12, P195 American Psychiatric Association, 2000, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU ARBINAGA F, 2002, ADICCIONES, V14, P139 *BBC NEWS, 2005, S KOR DIES GAM SESS Block JJ, 2008, AM J PSYCHIAT, V165, P306, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07101556 Castellana Rosell M., 1999, Revista Espanola de Drogodependencias, V24, P118 CHA AE, 2007, CHINA STERN TREATMEN GRIFFITHS D, 2005, TREATING CHINAS ONLI GUARDIOLA E, 1993, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V101, P368 Holden C, 2001, SCIENCE, V294, P980, DOI 10.1126/science.294.5544.980 Hollander E, 2006, AM J PSYCHIAT, V163, P1670, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.10.1670 Kandell J. J., 1998, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHA, V1, P11, DOI DOI 10.1089/CPB.1998.1.11 Kubey RW, 2001, J COMMUN, V51, P366, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02885.x Morahan-Martin J, 2000, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V16, P13, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00049-7 Nieminen P, 1997, SUBST USE MISUSE, V32, P555, DOI 10.3109/10826089709027312 Niemz K, 2005, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V8, P562, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.562 Orzack M. H., 2003, COMPUTER ADDICTION S Sanchez-Carbonell X, 2005, ADDICTION, V100, P1166, DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01135.x Sanchez-Carbonell X, 2008, ADICCIONES, V20, P149, DOI 10.20882/adicciones.279 VALENCIANA C, 2008, PATERNA ABRE CTR TRA YOUNG K, 2006, WELCOME CTR INTERNET Young KS, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P671, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9971 NR 22 TC 67 Z9 74 PU MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOC PI CHICAGO PA 65 EAST WACKER PLACE, STE 1900, CHICAGO, IL 60601-7298 USA PD APR PY 2009 VL 97 IS 2 BP 102 EP 107 DI 10.3163/1536-5050.97.2.006 WC Information Science & Library Science SC Information Science & Library Science ER PT J AU O'Connor, EL Longman, H White, KM Obst, PL AF O'Connor, Erin L. Longman, Huon White, Katherine M. Obst, Patricia L. TI Sense of Community, Social Identity and Social Support Among Players of Massively Multiplayer Online Games (MMOGs): A Qualitative Analysis SO JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Article DE MMOGs; online games; cyberpsychology; sense of community; social identity; social support; qualitative ID SCIENCE-FICTION FANDOM; INTERNET USE; ADOLESCENT; WORLD AB The majority of research examining massively multiplayer online game (MMOG)-based social relationships has used quantitative methodologies. The present study used qualitative semi-structured interviews with 22 Australian World of Warcraft (WoW) players to examine their experiences of MMOG-based social relationships. Interview transcripts underwent thematic analysis and revealed that participants reported experiencing an MMOG-based sense of community (a sense of belonging within the gaming or WoW community), discussed a number of different MMOG-based social identities (such as gamer, WoW player and guild or group member) and stated that they derived social support (a perception that one is cared for and may access resources from others within a group) from their relationships with other players. The findings of this study confirm that MMOG players can form gaming communities. Almost all participants accessed or provided in-game social support, and some gave or received broader emotional support. Players also identified as gamers and guild members. Fewer participants identified as WoW players. Findings indicated that changes to the game environment influence these relationships and further exploration of players' experiences could determine the optimal game features to enhance positive connections with fellow players. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. C1 [O'Connor, Erin L.; Longman, Huon; White, Katherine M.; Obst, Patricia L.] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Psychol & Counselling, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia. C3 Queensland University of Technology (QUT) RP O'Connor, EL (corresponding author), Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Psychol & Counselling, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia. EM el.oconnor@qut.edu.au CR Abrams D, 1988, SOCIAL IDENTIFICATIO Allgower A, 2001, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V20, P223, DOI 10.1037//0278-6133.20.3.223 Beaudoin CE, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P587, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9986 Bessiere K, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P530, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9994 Blanchard AL, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P827, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9946 Boellstorff T, 2008, COMING OF AGE IN SECOND LIFE: AN ANTHROPOLOGIST EXPLORES THE VIRTUALLY HUMAN, P1 Braun V., 2006, QUALITATIVE RES PSYC, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA] Caplan S, 2009, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V25, P1312, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.06.006 COHEN S, 1983, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V13, P99, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb02325.x Corbin J., 2008, BASIC QUALITATIVE RE, Vthird Coulson NS, 2007, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V68, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.002 Fogel J, 2002, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V21, P398, DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.21.4.398 Fong P., 2009, P 44 ANN APS C, P62 Griffiths MD, 2004, J ADOLESCENCE, V27, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.10.007 Griffiths MD, 2003, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V6, P81, DOI 10.1089/109493103321167992 Haber MG, 2007, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V39, P133, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9100-9 Hornsey MJ, 2008, SOC PERSONAL PSYCHOL, V2, P204, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x Hussain Z, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P747, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2009.0059 Longman H, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P563, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2009.0001 Obst P, 2002, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V30, P87, DOI 10.1002/jcop.1052 Obst P, 2002, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V30, P105, DOI 10.1002/jcop.1053 Obst P, 2010, J COMMUNITY APPL SOC, V20, P525, DOI 10.1002/casp.1067 Patton MQ., 2002, QUALITATIVE RES EVAL PRETTY GMH, 1994, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V22, P346, DOI 10.1002/1520-6629(199410)22:4<346::AID-JCOP2290220407>3.0.CO;2-J Ryan RM, 2006, MOTIV EMOTION, V30, P347, DOI 10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8 Sarason S. B., 1977, PSYCHOL SENSE COMMUN Sum S, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P235, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2008.0150 Swickert RJ, 2002, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V18, P437, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00054-1 Tajfel H., 1978, DIFFERENTIATION SOCI Tajfel H., 1979, SOCIAL PSYCHOL INTER, P33 Whitlock JL, 2006, DEV PSYCHOL, V42, P407, DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.407 Williams D., 2006, GAMES CULT, V1, P338, DOI DOI 10.1177/1555412006292616 Yee N, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P772, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772 Yee N, 2006, PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AUG, V15, P309, DOI 10.1162/pres.15.3.309 NR 34 TC 39 Z9 40 PU WILEY PI HOBOKEN PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA PD NOV-DEC PY 2015 VL 25 IS 6 BP 459 EP 473 DI 10.1002/casp.2224 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Montiel, I Agustina, JR AF Montiel, Irene Agustina, Jose R. TI Educational challenges of emerging risks in cyberspace: foundations of an appropriate strategy for preventing online child victimisation SO REVISTA ESPANOLA DE PEDAGOGIA LA Spanish DT Article DE cybervictimisation of minors; cyberpsychology; education in cyberspace; pedagogy of prosocial values; communicating to prevent crime; criminological theories useful for education; cyberbullying; grooming; sexting ID INTERNET USE; PARENTAL MEDIATION; SPANISH CHILDREN; PEER INFLUENCE; YOUTH; ADOLESCENCE; PREVALENCE; BEHAVIOR; EXPOSURE; VIOLENCE AB In just a few years, technological changes have transformed how people interact and communicate with each other, in particular among so-called digital adolescents. The impact of technology on routine activities and mainstream culture has led to an increase in young peoples' exposure to psychological and criminological risks. As a result of this new psychosocial trend, new educational challenges are appearing and it is becoming more necessary to react to these challenges on the basis of an adequate diagnosis of psychology and pedagogy relating to adolescents. Criminological theories and research have tried to identify risk and protection factors to understand victimisation processes in more depth and improve prevention strategies. In this context, it is necessary to develop educational programs that consider personal, familial, and situational vulnerabilities and weaknesses in order to foster resilient individuals who can successfully confront the risks inherent to cyberspace. By analysing specific forms of cybervictimisation, guidelines based on criminological research and the most frequent victimisation processes will be identified in order to improve design of educational programs focused on parents, educators and potential victims. C1 [Montiel, Irene] Univ Int Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. [Montiel, Irene] Univ Int Catalunya, Master Ciberdelincuencia, Barcelona, Spain. [Agustina, Jose R.] Univ Int Catalunya, Derecho Penal, Barcelona, Spain. C3 Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC); Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC); Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC) RP Montiel, I (corresponding author), Univ Int Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.; Montiel, I (corresponding author), Univ Int Catalunya, Master Ciberdelincuencia, Barcelona, Spain. EM imontiel@uic.es; jragustina@uic.es CR AGUSTINA J.R., 2010, REV ELECT CIENCIA PE, V12, P1 Agustina J. R., 2010, VIOLENCIA INTRAFAMIL, P61 Agustina J. R., 2014, CUADERNOS POLITICA C, V114, P143 Agustina J. R., 2017, REV ESPANOLA MED LEG, V43, P43 Agustina JR., 2016, REV INTERNET DERECHO, V22, P21, DOI [10.7238/idp.v0i22.2970, DOI 10.7238/IDP.V0I22.2970] Aiken Mary, 2017, CYBER EFFECT EXPERT AKERS RL, 1990, J CRIM LAW CRIM, V81, P653, DOI 10.2307/1143850 Balakrishnan J, 2018, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V16, P722, DOI 10.1007/s11469-017-9844-x Baumgartner SE, 2012, PEDIATRICS, V130, pE1489, DOI 10.1542/peds.2012-0842 Brand M, 2014, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00375 Calvete E, 2016, EUR J CRIM POLICY RE, V22, P271, DOI 10.1007/s10610-015-9292-8 Carr N., 2011, SHALLOWS WHAT INTERN COHEN LE, 1979, AM SOCIOL REV, V44, P588, DOI 10.2307/2094589 Collins S. G., 2017, ANTHR NOW, V9, P102 de Santisteban P, 2017, PSYCHOSOC INTERV, V26, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.psi.2017.02.001 Drouin M, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, pA25, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.030 Echeburua E., 2016, ABUSO INTERNET ANTES, P169 Eynon R, 2011, COMPUT EDUC, V56, P585, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.020 Favero P, 2016, ROUT STUD EURO COMMU, V10, P209 Favero PSH, 2018, AM ANTHROPOL, V120, P163, DOI 10.1111/aman.12999 Finkelhor D., 2008, CHILDHOOD VICTIMIZAT Finkelhor D, 2007, CHILD ABUSE NEGLECT, V31, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.03.012 Finkelhor D, 2009, PEDIATRICS, V124, P1411, DOI 10.1542/peds.2009-0467 Gamez-Guadix M, 2018, J ADOLESCENCE, V63, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.12.002 Gamez-Guadix M, 2015, SEX RES SOC POLICY, V12, P145, DOI 10.1007/s13178-015-0186-9 Garcia Guilabert Natalia, 2017, CIBERACOSO ANALISIS Gasso A. M., 2018, REV ESPANOLA MED LEG, DOI [10.1016/j.rem1.2018.11.003, DOI 10.1016/J.REM1.2018.11.003] Gomez Cruz E., 2012, CULTURA KODAK IMAGEN, V23 Gottfredson M. R., 1990, GEN THEORY CRIME Greenfield D., 2011, INTERNET ADDICTION H, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118013991.CH8 Han Byung Chul, 2014, PSICOPOLITICA Hasebrink U., 2011, PATTERNS RISK SAFETY Herrera Moreno M., 2014, REV ELECT CIENCIA PE, V16-10 Hollis ME, 2013, CRIME PREV COMMUNITY, V15, P65, DOI 10.1057/cpcs.2012.14 Ibrahim Y., 2015, J MEDIA PRACTICE, V16, P42, DOI DOI 10.1080/14682753.2015.1015800 Katz Jack, 1988, SEDUCTIONS CRIME MOR Kirschner PA, 2017, TEACH TEACH EDUC, V67, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001 Knapp TJ, 1976, GAMBLING SOC, P276 Kowalski RM, 2014, PSYCHOL BULL, V140, P1073, DOI 10.1037/a0035618 L'Ecuyer C., 2018, SON NUESTROS ALUMNOS Lapenta F, 2011, VISUAL STUD, V26, P14, DOI 10.1080/1472586X.2011.548485 LEcuyer C., 2015, EDUCAR REALIDAD Lee SJ, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P640, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9975 Lin X, 2015, PROG NEURO-PSYCHOPH, V56, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.08.016 Livingstone S, 2014, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V55, P635, DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12197 Livingstone S, 2008, J BROADCAST ELECTRON, V52, P581, DOI 10.1080/08838150802437396 Loh KK, 2016, NEUROSCIENTIST, V22, P506, DOI 10.1177/1073858415595005 Marcum CD, 2010, DEVIANT BEHAV, V31, P381, DOI 10.1080/01639620903004903 Martellozzo Elena, 2013, ONLINE CHILD SEXUAL Mesch GS, 2009, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V12, P387, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2009.0068 Miller D., 2018, CAMBRIDGE ENCY ANTHR, DOI 10.29164/18digital Miro F, 2014, CIBERAPP ESTUDIO ALC MIRO F, 2012, CIBERCRIMEN FENOMENO Mitchell K., 2004, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V35, P424, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.05.006 Mitchell KJ, 2007, AM J PREV MED, V32, P532, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.001 Mitchell KJ, 2001, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V285, P3011, DOI 10.1001/jama.285.23.3011 Montiel I., 2018, REV IBEROAMERICANA P, V11, P19, DOI [10.33881/2027-1786.rip.11302, DOI 10.33881/2027-1786.RIP.11302] MONTIEL I, 2016, REV INTERNET DRET PO, V22, P119, DOI DOI 10.7238/IDP.V0I22.2969 Montiel I., 2014, DELITOS SEXUALES MEN, P203 Montiel I., 2018, CIBERCRIMEN, VII, P405 Montiel I, 2016, CHILD ABUSE NEGLECT, V52, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.12.005 Moore R, 2010, INT J CYBER CRIMINOL, V4, P685 Navarro R, 2013, EUR J PSYCHOL EDUC, V28, P725, DOI 10.1007/s10212-012-0137-2 Oliva A., 2014, EXISTEN ADICCIONES S, P87 Ortega y Gasset J, 1914, MEDITACIONES QUIJOTE Ortega-Baron J, 2016, COMUNICAR, V24, P57, DOI 10.3916/C46-2016-06 Osgood DW, 2004, CRIMINOLOGY, V42, P519, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00528.x Pereda N, 2014, CHILD ABUSE NEGLECT, V38, P640, DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.01.019 Pink S, 2012, MEDIA INT AUST, P145, DOI 10.1177/1329878X1214500116 Rettberg JW, 2014, PALGRAVE PIVOT, P1, DOI 10.1057/9781137476661 Rowlands I, 2008, ASLIB PROC, V60, P290, DOI 10.1108/00012530810887953 Sanjek R, 2015, EFIELDNOTES MAKINGS Sherman LE, 2018, CHILD DEV, V89, P37, DOI 10.1111/cdev.12838 Sherman LE, 2016, PSYCHOL SCI, V27, P1027, DOI 10.1177/0956797616645673 Silva Sanchez J. M., 2018, COMMUNICATION Slonje R, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024 Smith P. K., 2014, UNDERSTANDING SCH BU Smith P. K., 2017, CHILD PSYCHOL PSYCHI, P141 Starcevic V, 2018, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V52, P408, DOI 10.1177/0004867418763532 Steeves V., 2008, TECHNOL SOC, V28, P4, DOI [10.1177/0270467607311488, DOI 10.1177/0270467607311488] Suler J, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P321, DOI 10.1089/1094931041291295 Tacchi J, 2012, FEM MEDIA STUD, V12, P528, DOI 10.1080/14680777.2012.741869 Tsitsika A, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P528, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2013.0382 Valcke M, 2011, COMPUT EDUC, V57, P1292, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.010 Villacampa C, 2017, INT J LAW CRIME JUST, V49, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.01.002 Walrave M, 2011, CHILD SOC, V25, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00260.x Wang J, 2009, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V45, P368, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021 Webster S., 2012, FINAL REPORT EXECUTI Wells M, 2008, CHILD MALTREATMENT, V13, P227, DOI 10.1177/1077559507312962 Whittle H, 2013, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V18, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.008 Wolak J, 2003, J ADOLESCENCE, V26, P105, DOI 10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00114-8 Wolf G., 1996, WIRED MAGAZINE Yao YW, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0116471 Ybarra ML, 2011, PEDIATRICS, V128, pE1376, DOI 10.1542/peds.2011-0118 Ybarra ML, 2004, J ADOLESCENCE, V27, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007 NR 95 TC 5 Z9 5 PU UNIV INT LA RIOJA-UNIR PI LOGRONO PA GRAN VIA 41, LOGRONO, 26002, SPAIN PD MAY-AUG PY 2019 VL 77 IS 273 BP 277 EP 294 DI 10.22550/REP77-2-2019-03 WC Education & Educational Research SC Education & Educational Research ER PT J AU Soldatova, GU Ilyukhina, SN AF Soldatova, Galina U. Ilyukhina, Svetlana N. TI SELF-DESTRUCTIVE ONLINE CONTENT: FEATURES OF ATTITUDE AND RESPONSE OF ADOLESCENTS AND YOUTH SO KONSULTATIVNAYA PSIKHOLOGIYA I PSIKHOTERAPIYA-COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY LA Russian DT Article DE cyberpsychology; digital socialization; social media; self-destructive behavior; self-injurious behavior; eating disorders; self-harm; suicidal behavior; digital self-harm ID INJURIOUS-BEHAVIOR; SUICIDAL-BEHAVIOR; RISK-FACTORS; HARM; EXPOSURE; INTERNET AB The paper examines the most common types of self-destructive online behavior of adolescents and young people (self-harm, suicide, and eating disorders), which are reflected on the Internet in the form of self-destructive content. We present the results of the empirical study on the perception of and reactions to self-destructive content and content about psychological assistance by 15-17-year-old adolescents and 18-25-year-old youths. The yielded data confirms that adolescents and young people are active consumers of self-destructive online content. Based on the analysis of the role of gender, age differences, and differences in the use of the Internet in responding to the aforementioned types of self-destructive content, we marked out a risk group, represented by adolescents and young people who show increased attention to self-destructive online content, as well as those who use the Internet more intensively and are more often subjected to various types of violence in real life. We emphasize the importance of developing effective online prevention measures for self-destructive behavior in adolescents and young people, nurturing a digital culture of online behavior, and raising digital competence, allowing for the creation of a safe and comfortable online space. C1 [Soldatova, Galina U.] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Fdn Internet Dev, Moscow Inst Psychoanal, Moscow, Russia. [Ilyukhina, Svetlana N.] Fdn Internet Dev, Moscow, Russia. C3 Lomonosov Moscow State University RP Soldatova, GU (corresponding author), Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Fdn Internet Dev, Moscow Inst Psychoanal, Moscow, Russia. EM soldatova.galina@gmail.com; svetla.iluhina@gmail.com FU Russian Foundation for Basic Research [20-013-00857] FX The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20-013-00857 "Socio-cultural and personal predictors of destructive and self-destructive behavior on the Internet in adolescents and youth". CR Abramova AA, 2018, CLIN PSYCHOL SPEC ED, V7, P21, DOI 10.17759/cpse.2018070202 Ambrumova A.G., 1989, SRAVNITELNO VOZRASTN, P52 Arendt F, 2019, NEW MEDIA SOC, V21, P2422, DOI 10.1177/1461444819850106 Ayers JW, 2017, JAMA INTERN MED, V177, P1527, DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3333 Bada M, 2019, ANN REV CYBERTHERAPY, V17, P25 Bannikov GS, 2018, Psikhol Nauk Obrazov, V23, P91, DOI 10.17759/pse.2018230409 Bannikov GS, 2016, Konsult Psikhol Psik, V24, P42, DOI 10.17759/cpp.2016240304 Belinskaya E.P, 2009, PSIKHOLOGICHESKIE IS Cohen R, 2019, NEW MEDIA SOC, V21, P1546, DOI 10.1177/1461444819826530 Darmon M, 2009, SOCIOLOGY, V43, P717, DOI 10.1177/0038038509105417 Dunlop SM, 2011, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V52, P1073, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02416.x Dupuis G., 2018, GLOBAL J MED PUBLIC, V7, P1 Enikolopov S.N, 2013, MEDITSINSKAYA KLIN P, P109 Favaro A., 2008, ANN REV EATING DIS 2, P1 Ferguson C. J., 2008, J INVESTIGATIVE PSYC, V5, P25, DOI [DOI 10.1002/JIP.76, 10.1002/jip.76] Fleming-May R. A., 2010, P 73 ASIS T, V47, P1, DOI [10.1002/meet.14504701212, DOI 10.1002/MEET.14504701212] Forbush KT, 2019, INT J EAT DISORDER, V52, P493, DOI 10.1002/eat.23050 Friedman H.S., 1998, ENCY MENTAL HLTH, P323 Fromm E., 2009, ANATOMIYA CHELOVECHE George M, 2019, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V65, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.04.022 Hagihara A, 2012, EUR ARCH PSY CLIN N, V262, P39, DOI 10.1007/s00406-011-0212-8 Haut F., 1998, PSYCHIAT B, V22, P641, DOI [10.1192/pb.22.10.641-a, DOI 10.1192/PB.22.10.641-A] Hawton K, 2012, LANCET, V379, P2373, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60322-5 Hier S, 2019, CRIME MEDIA CULT, V15, P379, DOI 10.1177/1741659018780183 Jenkins H., 2015, POLITY Kelina M.Yu., 2011, PSIKHOL NAUK OBRAZOV, V16, P44 Kim Jung-Hwan, 2007, CLOTH TEXT RES J, V25, P3, DOI DOI 10.1177/0887302X06296873 Kuznetsova S.O., 2019, NATSIONALNYI PSIKHOL, P88, DOI [10.11621/npj.2019.0310, DOI 10.11621/NPJ.2019.0310] Lasarus R., 1984, STRESS APPRAISAL COP Lyubov EB, 2019, SUICIDOLOGY, V10, P16, DOI 10.32878/suiciderus.19-10-04(37)-16-46 Mars B, 2015, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V185, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.001 Moreno MA, 2016, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V58, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.015 Oexle N, 2019, DEATH STUD, V43, P381, DOI [10.1080/07481187.2018.1474286, 10.1080/07481187.2018.1539052] Ownby D., 2020, AM EC, V65, P312, DOI [10.1177/0569434519896768, DOI 10.1177/0569434519896768] Polskaya NA, 2019, Konsult Psikhol Psik, V27, P156, DOI 10.17759/cpp.20192703010 Polskaya NA, 2018, CLIN PSYCHOL SPEC ED, V7, P1, DOI 10.17759/cpse.2018070201 Puzanova Zh.V., 2015, TEORIYA PRAKTIKA OBS, P16 Record RA, 2020, HEALTH COMMUN, V35, P894, DOI 10.1080/10410236.2019.1598738 Schwarzer R, 2003, POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: HANDBOOK OF MODELS AND MEASURES, P393, DOI 10.1037/10612-025 Sharma S.d, 2016, AKTUALNYE VOPROSY SO, P157 Sheehan L, 2017, PSYCHIAT RES, V256, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.015 Soldatova G., 2019, WE ARE RESPONSIBLE D Soldatova G.U., 2020, NATSIONALNYY PSIKHOL, V2, P3, DOI [10.11621/npj.2020.0201, DOI 10.11621/NPJ.2020.0201] Soldatova G. U., 2017, TSIFROVOE POKOLENIE Sumner SA, 2019, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V65, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.025 Syrokvashina KV, 2019, PSYCHOL LAW, V9, P71, DOI 10.17759/psylaw.2019090105 [Сыроквашина К.В. Syrokvashina K.V.], 2017, [Российский психиатрический журнал, Russian Journal of Psychiatry, Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal], P24 Syrokvashina KV, 2016, Konsult Psikhol Psik, V24, P8, DOI 10.17759/cpp.2016240302 Treasure J, 2010, LANCET, V375, P583, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61748-7 Troya MI, 2019, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V214, P186, DOI 10.1192/bjp.2019.11 World Health Organization, 2019, SUIC EL RES Yarmina A.N., 2019, NACIONALNYJ PSIKHOLO, P17, DOI 10.11621/npj.2019.0303 Zaichenko A.A, 2009, PSIKHOLOGIYA TELESNO, P191 NR 53 TC 1 Z9 3 PU MOSCOW STATE UNIV PSYCHOLOGY & EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2021 VL 29 IS 1 BP 66 EP 91 DI 10.17759/cpp.2021290105 WC Psychology, Clinical SC Psychology ER PT J AU Wong, J Ho, KKW Leung, TN Chiu, DKW AF Wong, Jenny Ho, Kevin K. W. Leung, Tin Nok Chiu, Dickson K. W. TI Exploring the associations of youth Facebook addiction with social capital perceptions SO ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW LA English DT Article DE Facebook addiction; Social capital; Cyberpsychology; Sense of closeness; Hierarchical regression ID INTERNET ADDICTION; SELF-ESTEEM; CONNECTEDNESS; PREDICTORS; NEED; GRATIFICATIONS; FRIENDS; SEX AB Purpose - Although Facebook addiction has been found to be a key motive for using Facebook, scant research has explored the association of Facebook addiction with social capital. While researchers addressed how Facebook use strengthened social capital, they did not address the resultant excessive and uncontrollable Facebook use, which is a key sign of Facebook addiction. Therefore, the authors develop this project to study this research gap. Design/methodology/approach - This research explores the motive of Facebook addiction by using a questionnaire to examine the relationships between Facebook addiction and two types of social capital: cognitive and bonding social capital. The authors recruited Hong Kong youth through Facebook and peer groups to complete a set of questionnaires on Facebook addiction, cognitive social capital, bonding social capital and the degree of extraversion. Hierarchical regression is used for analyzing the data collected. Findings - Hierarchical regression results indicated that the more addicted one was to Facebook, the lower the cognitive social capital one perceived. Such a negative relationship was particularly significant for female participants. A similar but marginally significant effect is also found for bonding social capital. Originality/value - This research sheds light on the impact of Facebook addiction on how one perceives shared meanings and the sense of belongingness with other people on social networks. C1 [Wong, Jenny] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Psychol, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China. [Ho, Kevin K. W.] Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch Business Sci Humanities & Social Sci, Tokyo, Japan. [Leung, Tin Nok; Chiu, Dickson K. W.] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Educ, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China. C3 University of Hong Kong; University of Tsukuba; University of Hong Kong RP Ho, KKW (corresponding author), Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch Business Sci Humanities & Social Sci, Tokyo, Japan. EM jennywongcop@gmail.com; ho.kevin.ge@u.tsukuba.ac.jp; tinnok@connect.hku.hk; dicksonchiu@ieee.org CR Andreassen CS, 2012, PSYCHOL REP, V110, P501, DOI 10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517 Backstrom L., 2013, NEWS FEED FYI WINDOW BAUMEISTER RF, 1995, PSYCHOL BULL, V117, P497, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 Bohn A, 2014, SOC NETWORKS, V37, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.11.003 Caci B, 2017, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V20, P251, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2016.0073 Centre for Youth Studies, 2017, YOUTH POL PART SOC M Chakraborty A., 2016, AM J PSYCHIAT RESIDE, V11, P7, DOI [10.1176/appi.ajp-rj.2016.111203, DOI 10.1176/APPI.AJP-RJ.2016.111203] Chan TTW, 2020, J ACAD LIBR, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102229 Clayton RB, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P687, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.002 Dandeneau SP, 2004, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V23, P584, DOI 10.1521/jscp.23.4.584.40306 Dong GN, 2021, INF DISCOV DELIV, V49, P319, DOI 10.1108/IDD-08-2020-0100 Ellison N, 2006, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V11 Ellison NB, 2011, NEW MEDIA SOC, V13, P873, DOI 10.1177/1461444810385389 Fong KCH, 2020, J ACAD LIBR, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102091 Geys B, 2010, SOCIOLOGY, V44, P523, DOI 10.1177/0038038510362474 Grieve R, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017 Ho KKW, 2018, INTERNET RES, V28, P587, DOI 10.1108/IntR-04-2017-0175 Hofstede G., 2011, ONLINE READINGS PSYC, V2, P1 John O. P., 2008, HDB PERSONALITY THEO, V3, P114, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)81000-8 Kraut R, 2002, J SOC ISSUES, V58, P49, DOI 10.1111/1540-4560.00248 Kuss DJ, 2014, CURR PHARM DESIGN, V20, P4026, DOI 10.2174/13816128113199990617 Kuss DJ, 2017, CLIN NEUROPSYCHIATR, V14, P73 Lam AHC, 2023, ASLIB J INFORM MANAG, V75, P112, DOI 10.1108/AJIM-12-2021-0389 Lee RM, 2001, J COUNS PSYCHOL, V48, P310 Lee-Won RJ, 2015, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V18, P567, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2015.0002 Leung TN, 2022, LIBR HI TECH, V40, P304, DOI 10.1108/LHT-04-2021-0122 Liu CN, 2021, LIBR HI TECH, DOI 10.1108/LHT-08-2021-0288 Masur PK, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V39, P376, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.047 McAndrew FT, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P2359, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.007 MCGUIRE WJ, 1961, SOCIOMETRY, V24, P184, DOI 10.2307/2786067 MERTON RK, 1968, SCIENCE, V159, P56, DOI 10.1126/science.159.3810.56 Moore K, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.009 Oxfam Hong Kong, 2018, HONG KONG IN REP Pi SM, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P1971, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.019 Pornsakulvanich V., 2012, P AS C MED MASS COMM, P50 Prebor G, 2021, LIBR HI TECH, DOI 10.1108/LHT-02-2021-0074 Putnam RD., 2000, BOWLING ALONE COLLAP Quan-Haase A, 2004, SOCIAL CAPTIAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, P113 Rodriguez, 2017, FACEBOOK ADDICTION A Ryan T, 2016, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, V10, DOI 10.5817/CP2016-3-4 Ryan T, 2014, J BEHAV ADDICT, V3, P133, DOI 10.1556/JBA.3.2014.016 Savci M, 2017, DUNSEN ADAM, V30, P202, DOI 10.5350/DAJPN2017300304 Schmitt DP, 2008, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V94, P168, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168 Sheldon KM, 2011, PSYCHOL POP MEDIA CU, V1, P2, DOI 10.1037/2160-4134.1.S.2 St John D., 2017, EVALUATING COG UNPUB Statista, 2018, PEN LEAD SOC NETW HO Statistia, 2018, DISTR FACE US WORLDW Van Zalk N, 2016, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, V10, DOI 10.5817/CP2016-3-3 Villalonga-Olives E, 2015, HEALTH PLACE, V36, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.09.002 Wallaroo Media, 2018, WALL MED Wang WY, 2021, ONLINE INFORM REV, V45, P207, DOI 10.1108/OIR-02-2020-0042 Westermann O, 2005, WORLD DEV, V33, P1783, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.018 Yang ZW, 2022, ONLINE INFORM REV, V46, P1225, DOI 10.1108/OIR-01-2021-0015 Ye SY, 2023, LIBR HI TECH, V41, P152, DOI 10.1108/LHT-06-2021-0178 Ye SY, 2021, INF DISCOV DELIV, V49, P136, DOI 10.1108/IDD-08-2020-0091 Yee N, 2006, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V9, P772, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772 Yip KHT, 2021, ONLINE INFORM REV, V45, P389, DOI 10.1108/OIR-07-2020-0287 Zhang Y, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P733, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0042 NR 58 TC 10 Z9 10 PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD PI BINGLEY PA HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND PD MAR 30 PY 2023 VL 47 IS 2 BP 283 EP 298 DI 10.1108/OIR-06-2021-0300 EA MAY 2022 WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library Science SC Computer Science; Information Science & Library Science ER PT C AU Averbukh, VL Averbukh, NV Vasev, P Gajniyarov, I Starodubtsev, I AF Averbukh, Vladimir L. Averbukh, Natalya, V Vasev, Pavel Gajniyarov, Igor Starodubtsev, Ilya GP IEEE TI The Tasks of Designing and Developing Virtual Test Stands SO 2020 GLOBAL SMART INDUSTRY CONFERENCE (GLOSIC) LA English DT Proceedings Paper DE virtual reality; virtual test stand; interfaces for virtual reality; cyberpsychology AB Virtual test stands are used for research when live experiment is either difficult or impossible. The possibility of multiple launches is necessary for the program simulating processes with various parameters, along with computer simulation experiments for complex technical objects with VR visualization of the results. Such systems are used, for instance, in the automobile industry. However, there is no mainstreaming yet, probably, because the existing issues have not been properly worked through. The paper discusses a number of problems connected with designing and developing virtual test stands. Determination of overall and interim goals of computer simulation for these systems is required. The use of specialized computer simulation means and/or simulation packages is possible. Computer simulation requires parallel computations. It is necessary to choose VR means suitable for the aims and objectives of the specific system. The necessity arises to use VR in online visualization mode, which presupposes graphic output in the course of program execution and the opportunity to interact with the program. This interaction can change the execution progress and the output graphic information. A major problem is organizing interaction with a virtual test stand. Interfaces for VR environment control and interfaces for simulation control are being considered. Device and natural interfaces are used in VR systems. Natural interfaces can be used to control the VR environment. Problems arise with natural interfaces in setting simulation parameters. Motion capture interfaces can also be used. When working with the stand, a user may experience undesired conditions, which should be studied and prevented. C1 [Averbukh, Vladimir L.] IMCS Ural Fed Univ, Inst Math & Mech, Ural Branch, Russian Acad Sci, Ekaterinburg, Russia. [Averbukh, Natalya, V] Ural Fed Univ, Dept Psychol, Ekaterinburg, Russia. [Vasev, Pavel; Gajniyarov, Igor; Starodubtsev, Ilya] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Math & Mech, Ural Branch, Ekaterinburg, Russia. C3 Krasovskii Institute of Mathematics & Mechanics; Russian Academy of Sciences; Ural Federal University; Krasovskii Institute of Mathematics & Mechanics; Russian Academy of Sciences RP Averbukh, VL (corresponding author), IMCS Ural Fed Univ, Inst Math & Mech, Ural Branch, Russian Acad Sci, Ekaterinburg, Russia. EM averbukh@imm.uran.ru; natalya_averbukh@mail.ru; vasev@imm.uran.ru; i.m.gainiarov@imm.uran.ru; starodubtsevis@robolab.tk FU Act 211 Government of the Russian -Federation [02, A03.21.0006] FX The work was supported by Act 211 Government of the Russian -Federation, contract No 02.A03.21.0006. CR Averbukh V. L., 2012, QUESTIONS DEFENSE TE, V14, P20 Bakanova T. Y., 2020, PROBL ATOM SCI TECH, V1, P66 Bryson S., 1994, Virtual Reality Software and Technology. Proceedings of the VRST '94 Conference, P201 Iida H., VIRTUAL VEHICLE KINE Kim B., EMBRACING NOVEL TECH, V102 Kommersant, ST PETERSBURG SCIENT Kress J, 2019, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V11501, P99, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-20656-7_6 MANUS, PRIME 2 HAPTIC GLOVE Moreland K, 2016, IEEE COMPUT GRAPH, V36, P5, DOI 10.1109/MCG.2016.35 Quesnel D., 1 ART INT M VIRT AUG, P6 Radchenko G. I, B S URAL STATE U, V37, P108 Rehab Senso., BREAKTHROUGH SOLUTIO STEAM, STEAM HARDWARE SOFTW STEAM, VALVE INDEX VR KIT S SUSU Supercomputer Simulation Laboratory, VIRTUAL TEST STAND B Vasyov P. A., 2010, PARALLEL COMPUTING T, P658 VR Concept, SWIFT START COLL 3D NR 17 TC 0 Z9 0 PU IEEE PI NEW YORK PA 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA PY 2020 BP 49 EP 54 WC Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Computer Science, Theory & Methods; Engineering, Industrial; Telecommunications SC Computer Science; Engineering; Telecommunications ER PT J AU Riva, G Banos, RM Botella, C Wiederhold, BK Gaggioli, A AF Riva, Giuseppe Banos, Rosa M. Botella, Cristina Wiederhold, Brenda K. Gaggioli, Andrea TI Positive Technology: Using Interactive Technologies to Promote Positive Functioning SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Article ID BUILD THEORY; FLOW; HEALTH; PSYCHOLOGY; REALITY AB It is generally assumed that technology assists individuals in improving the quality of their lives. However, the impact of new technologies and media on well-being and positive functioning is still somewhat controversial. In this paper, we contend that the quality of experience should become the guiding principle in the design and development of new technologies, as well as a primary metric for the evaluation of their applications. The emerging discipline of Positive Psychology provides a useful framework to address this challenge. Positive Psychology is the scientific study of optimal human functioning and flourishing. Instead of drawing on a "disease model" of human behavior, it focuses on factors that enable individuals and communities to thrive and build the best in life. In this paper, we propose the "Positive Technology" approach-the scientific and applied approach to the use of technology for improving the quality of our personal experience through its structuring, augmentation, and/or replacement-as a way of framing a suitable object of study in the field of cyberpsychology and human-computer interaction. Specifically, we suggest that it is possible to use technology to influence three specific features of our experience-affective quality, engagement/actualization, and connectedness-that serve to promote adaptive behaviors and positive functioning. In this framework, positive technologies are classified according to their effects on a specific feature of personal experience. Moreover, for each level, we have identified critical variables that can be manipulated to guide the design and development of positive technologies. C1 [Riva, Giuseppe] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Psychol, Interact Commun & Ergon NEw Technologies ICE NET, I-20123 Milan, Italy. [Riva, Giuseppe; Gaggioli, Andrea] Ist Auxol Italiano, Appl Technol Neuro Psychol Lab ATN P Lab, Milan, Italy. [Banos, Rosa M.] Univ Valencia, Dpto Personalidad Evaluac & Tratamientos Psicol, Valencia, Spain. [Banos, Rosa M.; Botella, Cristina] Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Fisiopatol Obesidad & Nutr CB06 03, Madrid, Spain. [Botella, Cristina] Univ Jaume 1, Dpto Psicol Basica Clin & Psicobiol, Castellon de La Plana, Spain. [Wiederhold, Brenda K.] Virtual Real Med Inst, Brussels, Belgium. [Wiederhold, Brenda K.] Virtual Real Med Ctr, San Diego, CA USA. C3 Catholic University of the Sacred Heart; IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; University of Valencia; CIBER - Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red; CIBEROBN; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Universitat Jaume I RP Riva, G (corresponding author), Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Psychol, Interact Commun & Ergon NEw Technologies ICE NET, Largo Gemelli 1, I-20123 Milan, Italy. EM giuseppe.riva@unicatt.it CR Amichai-Hamburger Y., 2009, TECHNOLOGY PSYCHOL W Aspinwall L. G., 2003, PSYCHOL HUMAN STRENG Banos R, 2009, J CYBERTHERAPY REHAB, V2, P235 Botella C, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P78, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2011.0140 Boulos MNK, 2007, HEALTH INFO LIBR J, V24, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00701.x COLEMAN JS, 1988, AM J SOCIOL, V94, pS95, DOI 10.1086/228943 Crisp R., 2008, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS Csikszentmihalyi M., 2008, FLOW PSYCHOL OPTIMAL Damasio AR, 1999, FEELING WHAT HAPPENS Finneran CM, 2005, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V15, P82 Fredrickson BL, 2004, PHILOS T R SOC B, V359, P1367, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2004.1512 Fredrickson BL, 2001, AM PSYCHOL, V56, P218, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 Gaggioli A, 2003, EMERG COMMUNICAT, V5, P121 Gaggioli A., 2004, AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE, P35 Gaggioli A., 2011, OPEN ED J, V4, P41, DOI [DOI 10.2174/1874920801104010041, 10.2174/1874920801104010041] GHANI JA, 1995, HUMAN COMPU, P291 Goldstein E. B., 2010, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL CO Gorini A, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P99, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0100 Haybron Dan, 2011, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS Hedman L, 2004, BEHAV INFORM TECHNOL, V23, P137, DOI 10.1080/01449290310001648251 Heeter C, 2003, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V12, P335, DOI 10.1162/105474603322391587 Helliwell JF, 2004, PHILOS T R SOC B, V359, P1435, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522 HOUSE JS, 1988, SCIENCE, V241, P540, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676 Hsiang Chen, 2000, Information Technology & People, V13, P263, DOI 10.1108/09593840010359473 Joyce K. M., 2009, ONLINE J DISTANCE LE, V12 Keyes C. L., 2003, FLOURISHING POSITIVE KEYES CLM, 2002, HDB POSITIVE PSYCHOL Klimmt C, 2003, PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AUG, V12, P346, DOI 10.1162/105474603322391596 Lambert MJ, 2008, J PSYCHOTHER INTEGR, V18, P222, DOI 10.1037/1053-0479.18.2.222 Liu YL, 2003, ERGONOMICS, V46, P1273, DOI 10.1080/00140130310001610829 Marsh T, 2003, EMERG COMMUNICAT, V5, P85 Mauri M, 2011, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V14, P723, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2010.0377 McGonical J, 2011, REALITY IS BROKEN WH Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 2010, MERR WEBST DICT Morris ME, 2005, IEEE INTERNET COMPUT, V9, P29, DOI 10.1109/MIC.2005.109 Pace S, 2004, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V60, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.08.005 Pallavicini F, 2009, J CYBERTHERAPY REHAB, V2, P315, DOI DOI 10.3233/978-1-60750-561-7-39 Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS Park H., 2010, J CYBERTHERAPY REHAB, V3, P71 Riva G, 2004, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V7, P402, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.402 Riva G., 2004, J NEUROENG REHABIL, V1, P1 Riva G., 2004, AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE, P19 Riva G., 2010, J CYBERTHERAPY REHAB, V2, P169 RIVA G, 2009, PRESENCE EVERYONE A, P29 Riva G, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P45, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2006.9993 Riva G, 2006, BEHAV RES METHODS, V38, P237, DOI 10.3758/BF03192775 Riva G, 2011, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V163, P496, DOI 10.3233/978-1-60750-706-2-496 Riva G, 2009, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V145, P3, DOI 10.3233/978-1-60750-018-6-3 Riva G, 2011, NEW IDEAS PSYCHOL, V29, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.11.002 Rogers Y, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4206, P404 Rosenblum L, 2000, IEEE COMPUT GRAPH, V20, P38, DOI 10.1109/38.814551 Russell JA, 2003, PSYCHOL REV, V110, P145, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145 Ryff CD, 2000, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V4, P30, DOI 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_4 Sander T, 2011, POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY AS SOCIAL CHANGE, P309, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-9938-9_17 Seligman, 2002, AUTHENTIC HAPPINESS Seligman ME., 2001, FLOURISH VISIONARY N Seligman MEP, 2000, AM PSYCHOL, V55, P5, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.56.1.89 Short J. A., 1976, SOCIAL PSYCHOL TELEC Skadberg YX, 2004, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V20, P403, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00050-5 Slater M, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010564 Snyder C. R., 2011, POSITIVE PSYCHOL SCI Swamynathan G., 2008, 1 WORKSH ONL SOC NET Van Beveren J., 2001, J E BUSINESS, V1, P1 Villani D., 2009, INT J HUM COMPUT INT, V1, P1 Villani D., 2007, INT J STRESS MANAG, V14, P260, DOI [10.1037/1072-5245.14.3.260, DOI 10.1037/1072-5245.14.3.260] Voiskounsky AE, 2008, PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF CYBERSPACE: THEORY, RESEARCH, APPLICATIONS, P70 Wakefield RL, 2006, EUR J INFORM SYST, V15, P292, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000619 WATERMAN AS, 1993, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V64, P678, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678 Waterworth JA, 2010, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V17, P167 Wolfe B., 2002, J PSYCHOTHERAPY INTE, V12, P147, DOI DOI 10.1037/1053-0479.12.2.147 Zahorik P, 1998, PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AUG, V7, P78, DOI 10.1162/105474698565541 Zhang P., 2009, AIS T HUM COMPUT INT, V1, P55, DOI [10.17705/1thci.00007, DOI 10.17705/1THCI.00007] Zhang P, 2002, COMMUNICATIONS ASS I, V9, P334 NR 73 TC 188 Z9 190 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD FEB PY 2012 VL 15 IS 2 BP 69 EP 77 DI 10.1089/cyber.2011.0139 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Grochowska, A Jarema, M Wichniak, A AF Grochowska, Anna Jarema, Marek Wichniak, Adam TI Virtual reality - a valuable tool to advance treatment of mental disorders SO ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY LA English DT Article DE virtual reality; psychotherapy; psychiatry; cyberpsychology ID SOCIAL-SKILLS; EXPOSURE; THERAPY; REHABILITATION; SCHIZOPHRENIA; ANXIETY; PROGRAM AB Human-computer interactions are a new path of treatment in mental healthcare. Virtual Reality technology is an interesting example of a digital tool that can be used in the treatment of mental disorders. It may be useful for improving personal competencies or overcoming deficits. This paper presents a range of successful VR applications in psychiatry and psychology. VR was found to be effective in the treatment of anxiety disorders, PTSD, schizophrenia, eating disorders, and substance use disorders. Repetitiveness of virtual experience in a particular environment offered by VR technology makes it a promising option in the treatment of mental disorders. Another asset of VR is a good control of intensity of therapeutic interventions that can be regulated by a therapist. Moreover, at the VR session can be individualized for each patient and it may be adapted to his/her personal preferences and needs. VR offers sense of "being here and now" during the session. It is also an engaging method of training for patients who do not want to use the conventional training techniques. Recently, VR use has become more available and acknowledged. However, there are still certain limitations for its broader use in the sector of mental health. The most significant one being the high cost of VR software designing, as well as VR hardware devices, which are still too expensive for mass adoption. C1 [Grochowska, Anna; Jarema, Marek; Wichniak, Adam] Inst Psychiat & Neurol, Dept Psychiat, Warsaw, Poland. C3 Institute of Psychiatry & Neurology RP Grochowska, A (corresponding author), Inst Psychiat & Neurol, Dept Psychiat, Warsaw, Poland. EM anna.grochowska100@gmail.com CR Botella C, 2015, NEUROPSYCH DIS TREAT, V11, P2533, DOI 10.2147/NDT.S89542 Cash T., 1996, SOURCEBOOK PSYCHOL T, P567 Cipresso P, VIRTUAL REALITY TECH Culbertson Christopher S, 2012, J Cyber Ther Rehabil, V5, P57 da Costa RMEM, 2004, COMPUT METH PROG BIO, V73, P173, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2607(03)00066-X de Carvalho MR, 2017, BEHAV SCI-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/bs7030043 Dellazizzo L, 2018, CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, V25, P878, DOI 10.1002/cpp.2322 Fernandez-Alvarez J, 2019, J ANXIETY DISORD, V61, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.005 Ferrer-Garcia M, 2012, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V21, P423, DOI 10.1162/PRES_a_00125 Freeman D, 2017, PSYCHOL MED, V47, P2393, DOI 10.1017/S003329171700040X Freeman D, 2018, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V5, P625, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30226-8 Freeman D, 2010, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V119, P83, DOI 10.1037/a0017514 Gaggioli A, 2014, J MED INTERNET RES, V16, P54, DOI 10.2196/jmir.3235 Jongeneel A, 2018, SCHIZOPHR RES, V202, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.042 Kompus K, 2018, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V5, P189, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30063-4 Kopelowicz A, 2006, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V32, pS12, DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbl023 Kuntze MF, 2001, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V4, P497, DOI 10.1089/109493101750527051 Lindner P, 2019, J ANXIETY DISORD, V61, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.07.003 Maples-Keller JL, 2017, NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, V14, P554, DOI 10.1007/s13311-017-0534-y Maples-Keller JL, 2017, HARVARD REV PSYCHIAT, V25, P103, DOI 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000138 Morina N, 2015, BEHAV RES THER, V74, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.010 Norr AM, 2018, DEPRESS ANXIETY, V35, P523, DOI 10.1002/da.22751 Park KM, 2011, PSYCHIAT RES, V189, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.04.003 Percie O, 2018, SCHIZOPHR RES Perpina C, 1999, Cyberpsychol Behav, V2, P149, DOI 10.1089/cpb.1999.2.149 Reger GM, 2019, J ANXIETY DISORD, V61, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.001 Riva G., 2003, PRESENCE CONNECT, V3, P1 Riva Giuseppe, 2004, J Neuroeng Rehabil, V1, P9, DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-1-9 Riva Giuseppe, 2011, J Diabetes Sci Technol, V5, P283 Roncero María, 2015, Rev. Mex. de trastor. aliment, V6, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.rmta.2015.11.001 Rus-Calafell M, 2014, J BEHAV THER EXP PSY, V45, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.09.002 Sohn BK, 2016, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V19, P686, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2016.0215 Triscari MT, 2015, NEUROPSYCH DIS TREAT, V11, P2591, DOI 10.2147/NDT.S93401 Tsang MMY, 2013, SCHIZOPHR RES, V144, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2012.12.024 Turner WA, 2014, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V34, P634, DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.10.003 Wiederhold BK, 2016, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V19, P67, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2016.0012 NR 36 TC 9 Z9 10 PU POLSKIE TOWARZYSTWO PSYCHIATRYCZNE-POLISH SOC PSYCHIATRY PI KRAKOW PA UL LENARTOWICZA 14, KRAKOW, 31138, POLAND PD MAR PY 2019 VL 21 IS 1 BP 65 EP 73 DI 10.12740/APP/101654 WC Psychiatry SC Psychiatry ER PT J AU Whitty, MT Doodson, J Creese, S Hodges, D AF Whitty, Monica Therese Doodson, James Creese, Sadie Hodges, Duncan TI A picture tells a thousand words: What Facebook and Twitter images convey about our personality SO PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES LA English DT Article DE Cyberpsychology; Personality; Profile images; Big Five; Social network sites; Facebook; Twitter ID SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES; SELF-PRESENTATION; PROFILE PICTURES; INTERNET; ONLINE; GENDER; NARCISSISM; REFLECT; OFFLINE; FRIENDS AB Researchers have questioned whether there is a relationship between personality and patterns of online self-presentation. This paper examined, more specifically, whether personality predicts profile choices as well as image choice behaviour on two different SNSs; Twitter and Facebook. We found that personality does, to some extent, predict choices regarding profile images; however, not always in the direction we predicted and results differed across sites. We found that participants who scored higher on conscientiousness and lower on extraversion were more likely to change their Facebook profile image. Participants who scored lower on extraversion were more likely to choose a Twitter profile image that included a photograph of themselves compared to participants who scored higher on extraversion. For participants whose Facebook profile image was a photograph of themselves, a greater proportion of participants selected a recent photograph from the past six months. However, this was not the case for Twitter. We conclude that personality can predict some image choices and behaviours that might be useful for future work on authentication and identification, although other predictor variables are potentially also important when considering the types of individual characteristics which might predict online behaviour on SNSs. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). C1 [Whitty, Monica Therese] Univ Warwick, WMG, Cyber Secur Ctr, Warwick, England. [Whitty, Monica Therese] Univ Melbourne, Media & Commun Dept, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. [Doodson, James] Univ Leicester, Dept Media & Commun, Leicester, Leics, England. [Creese, Sadie] Univ Oxford, Dept Comp Sci, Cyber Secur Ctr, Oxford, Oxon, England. [Hodges, Duncan] Cranfield Univ, Ctr Elect Warfare Informat & Cyber, Def Acad United Kingdom, Shrivenham, England. C3 University of Warwick; University of Melbourne; University of Leicester; University of Oxford; Cranfield University RP Whitty, MT (corresponding author), Univ Warwick, WMG, Cyber Secur Ctr, Warwick, England. EM MW@warwick.ac.uk FU UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J004995/1]; EPSRC [EP/J004995/1] Funding Source: UKRI; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J004995/1] Funding Source: researchfish FX The work reported in this paper was supported by award EP/J004995/1: An Exploration of Superidentity, from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. CR Back MD, 2010, PSYCHOL SCI, V21, P372, DOI 10.1177/0956797609360756 Buchanan T, 2005, EUR J PSYCHOL ASSESS, V21, P115, DOI 10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.115 Costa P. T., 1992, REVISED NEO PERSONAL Davison HK, 2012, EMPLOY RESPONSIB RIG, V24, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10672-011-9178-y Dunn RA, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.015 Fernandez S, 2017, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V104, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.006 Goffman E., 1959, GOFFMAN READER, P21 GOLDBERG LR, 1990, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V59, P1216, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216 Hamburger YA, 2000, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V16, P441, DOI 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00017-0 Hughes DJ, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P561, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.001 Kapidzic S, 2015, NEW MEDIA SOC, V17, P958, DOI 10.1177/1461444813520301 Kapidzic S, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P14, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0143 Kramer N. C., 2008, J MEDIA PSYCHOL-GER, V20, P106, DOI DOI 10.1027/1864-1105.20.3.106 Lee-Won RJ, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V39, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.007 Leikas S, 2013, J RES PERS, V47, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.012 Marriott TC, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V32, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.014 Marwick AE, 2011, NEW MEDIA SOC, V13, P114, DOI 10.1177/1461444810365313 McKenna KYA, 2000, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V4, P57, DOI 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6 Muscanell NL, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.016 Nadkarni A, 2012, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V52, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007 Raacke J, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P169, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.0056 Saslow LR, 2013, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V4, P411, DOI 10.1177/1948550612460059 Subrahmanyam K, 2008, J APPL DEV PSYCHOL, V29, P420, DOI 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.003 Tifferet S, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V35, P388, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.016 Turkle S., 1995, LIFE SCREEN IDENTITY Valkenburg PM, 2009, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V18, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x Wang JL, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P2313, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.001 Whitty Monica, 2017, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY STUD Wu YCJ, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V51, P880, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.014 Zheng WZ, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V63, P891, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.041 NR 30 TC 20 Z9 20 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD OCT 15 PY 2018 VL 133 BP 109 EP 114 DI 10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.050 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Riva, P Aureli, N Silvestrini, F AF Riva, Paolo Aureli, Nicolas Silvestrini, Federica TI Social influences in the digital era: When do people conform more to a human being or an artificial intelligence? SO ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA LA English DT Article DE Social influence; Informational influence; Artificial intelligence (AI); Non-human agent; Conformity; Cyberpsychology ID PERCEPTION AB The spread of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in ever-widening domains (e.g., virtual assistants) increases the chances of daily interactions between humans and AI. But can non-human agents influence human beings and perhaps even surpass the power of the influence of another human being? This research investigated whether people faced with different tasks (objective vs. subjective) could be more influenced by the information provided by another human being or an AI. We expected greater AI (vs. other humans) influence in objective tasks (i.e., based on a count and only one possible correct answer). By contrast, we expected greater human (vs. AI) influence in subjective tasks (based on attributing meaning to evocative images). In Study 1, participants (N = 156) completed a series of trials of an objective task to provide numerical estimates of the number of white dots pictured on black backgrounds. Results showed that participants conformed more with the AI's responses than the human ones. In Study 2, participants (N = 102) in a series of subjective tasks observed evocative images associated with two concepts ostensibly provided, again, by an AI or a human. Then, they rated how each concept described the images appropriately. Unlike the objective task, in the subjective one, participants conformed more with the human than the AI's responses. Overall, our findings show that under some circumstances, AI can influence people above and beyond the influence of other humans, offering new insights into social influence processes in the digital era. C1 [Riva, Paolo; Aureli, Nicolas; Silvestrini, Federica] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Piazza Ateneo Nuovo 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy. C3 University of Milano-Bicocca RP Riva, P (corresponding author), Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Piazza Ateneo Nuovo 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy. EM paolo.riva1@unimib.it CR Andrighetto L, 2018, SOC INFLUENCE, V13, P78, DOI 10.1080/15534510.2018.1439769 [Anonymous], 2008, ART STRATEGY GAME TH Asch S.E., 1951, GROUPS LEADERSHIP ME, P222 Beckner C, 2016, J LANG SOC PSYCHOL, V35, P158, DOI 10.1177/0261927X15584682 Bond R, 1996, PSYCHOL BULL, V119, P111, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111 BOVARD EW, 1948, J ABNORM SOC PSYCH, V43, P62, DOI 10.1037/h0061747 Brandstetter J, 2017, ACMIEEE INT CONF HUM, P63, DOI 10.1145/2909824.3020257 Brandstetter J, 2014, IEEE INT C INT ROBOT, P1335, DOI 10.1109/IROS.2014.6942730 Castelli L, 2001, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V37, P419, DOI 10.1006/jesp.2000.1471 Chidambaram V, 2012, ACMIEEE INT CONF HUM, P293 Cialdini Robert B, 1987, INFLUENCE, V3 de Winter JCF, 2014, COGN TECHNOL WORK, V16, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10111-011-0188-1 Dunn, 2021, SCI RES METHODOLOGY Faul F, 2007, BEHAV RES METHODS, V39, P175, DOI 10.3758/BF03193146 Glikson E, 2020, ACAD MANAG ANN, V14, P627, DOI 10.5465/annals.2018.0057 Goldman AI, 2001, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V63, P85, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00093.x Gray HM, 2007, SCIENCE, V315, P619, DOI 10.1126/science.1134475 Hales A. H., 2014, OXFORD HDB SOCIAL IN, P205, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199859870.013.26 Hertz N., 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF THE H, V60, P313, DOI DOI 10.1177/1541931213601071 Hertz N, 2018, HUM FACTORS, V60, P1207, DOI 10.1177/0018720818788473 Hovland CI, 1951, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V15, P635, DOI 10.1086/266350 Lee EJ, 2004, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V20, P779, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.005 Lee M. K. O., 2006, P ANN HAWAII INT C S, V6, P1, DOI [10.1109/HICSS.2006.204, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2006.204] Lee MKO, 2011, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V48, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2010.08.005 Lucas GM, 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT VIRTUAL AGENTS (IVA' 19), P22, DOI 10.1145/3308332.3329464 Lucas T., 2006, SOC INFLUENCE, V1, P58 Melamed David., 2019, SOCIUS, V5, DOI 10.1177/2378023119866971 Perfumi SC, 2019, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V92, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.017 Qualtrics, 2020, US RAPPAPOR.M, 1970, HUM FACTORS, V12, P25, DOI 10.1177/001872087001200104 Riva P, 2015, J EXP PSYCHOL-APPL, V21, P313, DOI 10.1037/xap0000057 Riva P, 2011, J PAIN SYMPTOM MANAG, V42, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.10.264 Rosander M, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P1587, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.023 Salomons N, 2021, ACM T HUM-ROBOT INTE, V10, DOI 10.1145/3442627 Salomons N, 2018, ACMIEEE INT CONF HUM, P187, DOI 10.1145/3171221.3171282 Sherif M, 1937, SOCIOMETRY, V1, P90, DOI 10.2307/2785261 Shiomi M, 2016, P 4 INT C HUM AG INT, P27 Siegel M, 2009, 2009 IEEE-RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS, P2563, DOI 10.1109/IROS.2009.5354116 Sundar S. S., 2008, DIGITAL MEDIA YOUTH, P73, DOI [10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073, DOI 10.1162/DMAL.9780262562324.073] Williams R, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 ACM CONFERENCE ON INTERACTION DESIGN AND CHILDREN (IDC 2018), P625, DOI 10.1145/3202185.3210788 WYER RS, 1966, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V4, P21, DOI 10.1037/h0023516 NR 41 TC 2 Z9 2 PU ELSEVIER PI AMSTERDAM PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS PD SEP PY 2022 VL 229 AR 103681 DI 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103681 EA JUL 2022 WC Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Nicklin, LL Swain, E Lloyd, J AF Nicklin, Laura Louise Swain, Emma Lloyd, Joanne TI Reactions to Unsolicited Violent, and Sexual, Explicit Media Content Shared over Social Media: Gender Differences and Links with Prior Exposure SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH LA English DT Article DE explicit content; social media; sexual; violent; unsolicited; cyberpsychology ID PORNOGRAPHY; TELEVISION; INTERNET AB While there has been extensive research into consumption of "traditional" forms of explicit sexual and violent media (within pornography, videogames and movies), the informal exchange and viewing of explicit real-world violent and sexual content via social media is an under-investigated and potentially problematic behaviour. The current study used an online survey (n= 225: 169f, 55m, 1x, mean age 30.61 (SD 12.03)) to explore self-reported reactions to unsolicited explicit violent and sexual content that participants had received from friends or contacts. In line with our predictions based on previous studies of fictional explicit content, we found effects of both gender and prior exposure on these reactions. Specifically, females rated both sexual and violent explicit content as significantly less funny and exciting and more disturbing than males did. Amongst males, those with high previous exposure rated violent content as more exciting than those with lower or no prior experience. Regardless of gender, participants with higher exposure to sexual content rated it as funnier than those with mild or no exposure, and those with higher exposure to violent content rated it as more amusing and more exciting. However, contrary to what desensitization theories would predict, prior exposure did not attenuate how disturbing explicit content (of either a sexual or a violent nature) was rated. Multiple avenues for further investigation emerged from this preliminary cross-sectional study, and we suggest priorities for further qualitative or longitudinal work on this novel topic. C1 [Nicklin, Laura Louise; Lloyd, Joanne] Univ Wolverhampton, Fac Educ Hlth & Wellbeing, Dept Psychol, Cyberpsychol Res Grp, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England. [Swain, Emma] Univ Wolverhampton, Dept Psychol, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England. C3 University of Wolverhampton; University of Wolverhampton RP Lloyd, J (corresponding author), Univ Wolverhampton, Fac Educ Hlth & Wellbeing, Dept Psychol, Cyberpsychol Res Grp, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England. EM Laura.nicklin@wlv.ac.uk; e.swain@wlv.ac.uk; joanne.lloyd@wlv.ac.uk CR Bender PK, 2018, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V19, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.003 Boyd RW, 2016, PEDIATRICS, V138, DOI 10.1542/peds.2016-1358 Branco-Illodo I, 2020, EUR J MARKETING, V54, P857, DOI 10.1108/EJM-05-2018-0309 Brockmyer J.F., 2013, OXFORD HDB MEDIA PSY, P212 Brooks S, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V46, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.053 Check J.V.P., 2012, PORNOGR RES ADV POLI, P159, DOI [10.4324/9780203052167, DOI 10.4324/9780203052167] Emmers-Sommer TM, 2006, SEX ROLES, V55, P311, DOI 10.1007/s11199-006-9085-0 Funk JB, 2004, J ADOLESCENCE, V27, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.10.005 GRIFFITHS MD, 1989, NEW IDEAS PSYCHOL, V7, P85, DOI 10.1016/0732-118X(89)90039-1 Hayes RM, 2018, WOMEN STUD INT FORUM, V71, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.wsif.2018.07.001 Ho F, 2019, PSYCHOL SEX ORIENTAT, V6, P217, DOI 10.1037/sgd0000322 Kuhn Simone, 2018, Neurosignals, V26, P22, DOI 10.1159/000487217 Oswald F, 2020, J SEX RES, V57, P597, DOI 10.1080/00224499.2019.1639036 Paasonen S, 2019, SOC MEDIA SOC, V5, DOI 10.1177/2056305119826126 Ringrose J., QUALITATIVE STUDY CH Seto MC, 2001, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V6, P35, DOI 10.1016/S1359-1789(99)00007-5 Spohr D., 2017, BUSINESS INF REV, V34, P150, DOI [10.1177/0266382117722446, DOI 10.1177/0266382117722446] Szycik GR, 2017, BRAIN IMAGING BEHAV, V11, P736, DOI 10.1007/s11682-016-9549-y Thompson RR, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aav3502 Weiss R, 2010, SEX ADDICT COMPULS, V17, P241, DOI 10.1080/10720162.2010.532079 Wolak J, 2007, PEDIATRICS, V119, P247, DOI 10.1542/peds.2006-1891 Wong D, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P465, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2018.0533 NR 22 TC 4 Z9 4 PU MDPI PI BASEL PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND PD JUN PY 2020 VL 17 IS 12 AR 4296 DI 10.3390/ijerph17124296 WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ER PT J AU Shlyapnikov, VN AF Shlyapnikov, V. N. TI Specifics of Volitional Regulation of Young Users of Social Network Sites SO PSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF THE HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS LA Russian DT Article DE volition; will; volitional regulation; self-control; self-regulation; volitional qualities; social network sites; Internet; ICT; cyberpsychology ID SOCIALIZATION; INFORMATION; WORK AB The article presents the results of the study exploring the influence of social networks on characteristics of volitional regulation in young people. Three groups of users of the social network VKontakte, differing in the time spent on the resource, as well as in the nature of online activity ("Up to 1 hour", "From 1 to 3 hours", "More than 3 hours") were compared. In total, 450 users aged 18 to 25 years old (average age 22.5 years) took part in the study. The sample consisted of 225 men and 225 women, university students or young professionals with higher education, single or unmarried, childless, living in large cities of the Russian Federation. The following methods were used: The Action Control Scale by J. Kuhl; the "Questionnaire for revealing the expression of self-control in the emotional sphere, activity and behavior"; the technique for self-assessment of volitional qualities; the Purpose in Life Test. Users who spend less than 1 hour a day in social networks are characterized by a more effective type of volitional regulation, strength of social and behavioral self-control, high self-estimation of volitional qualities, as well as a high meaningfulness of life. Users who spend more than 3 hours in social networks, on the contrary, are characterized by a less effective type of volitional regulation, low manifestation of social and behavioral self-control, low self-estimation of volitional qualities, as well as insufficient meaningfulness of life. C1 [Shlyapnikov, V. N.] Moscow Inst Psychoanal, Dept Personal & Individual Differences, 34-14 Kutuzovskii Ave, Moscow 121170, Russia. RP Shlyapnikov, VN (corresponding author), Moscow Inst Psychoanal, Dept Personal & Individual Differences, 34-14 Kutuzovskii Ave, Moscow 121170, Russia. EM shlyapnikov.vladimir@gmail.com FU Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [N 18-013-01108] FX The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project N 18-013-01108. CR Aysina RM, 2019, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V10, P42, DOI 10.17759/sps.2019100404 Baumann N, 2018, WHY PEOPLE THINGS TH Baumeister RF, 2016, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V54, P67, DOI 10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.04.001 Belinskaya EP, 2020, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V11, P92, DOI 10.17759/sps.2020110106 Bozhovich L. I, 2001, PROBLEMY FORMIROVANI, P302 Bykov A. V, 1999, STANOVLENIE VOLEVOI Diefendorff JM, 2000, J APPL PSYCHOL, V85, P250, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.250 Ilin E.P., 2000, PSIKHOLOGIYA VOLI Ivannikov VA, 2014, VOP PSIKHOL+, P15 IVANNIKOV VA, 1990, PSIKHOL ZH, V11, P39 [Иванников Вячеслав Андреевич Ivannikov Vyacheslav A.], 2019, [Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14: Психология, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya], P27, DOI 10.11621/vsp.2019.02.27 Khoroshilov DA, 2019, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V10, P9, DOI 10.17759/sps.2019100402 Kochetkov NV, 2020, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V11, P27, DOI 10.17759/sps.2020110103 Krainyukov SV, 2019, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V10, P23, DOI 10.17759/sps.2019100403 Krasilo TA, 2020, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V11, P144, DOI 10.17759/sps.2020110109 Leontiev D. A., 2000, TEST SMYSLOZHIZNENNY Mischel W, 2011, SOC COGN AFFECT NEUR, V6, P252, DOI 10.1093/scan/nsq081 Shapkin S.A., 1997, EKSPERIMENTALNOE IZU Shlyapnikov V. N, 2018, NIZHEGORODSKOE OBRAZ, V1, P4 Smirnova EO, 2015, KULT-ISTOR PSIKHOL, V11, P9, DOI 10.17759/chp.2015110302 Soldatova GU, 2019, Konsult Psikhol Psik, V27, P97, DOI 10.17759/cpp.2019270307 Soldatova GU, 2018, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V9, P71, DOI 10.17759/sps.2018090308 [Солдатова Г.У. Soldatova G.U.], 2017, [Современная зарубежная психология, Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya], V6, P21, DOI 10.17759/jmfp.2017060402 Soldatova G.U., 2013, TSIFROVAYA KOMPETENT Sukhanova A. Sh, 2018, MUNITSIPALITET EKONO, V2, P88 Voiskunskii AE, 2019, Konsult Psikhol Psik, V27, P22, DOI 10.17759/cpp.2019270303 VTsIOM, 2021, INTERNET KAK SFERA O NR 27 TC 0 Z9 0 PU NATL RES UNIV HIGHER EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA NATL RES UNIV HIGHER EDUCATION, MOSCOW, 00000, RUSSIA PY 2021 VL 18 IS 4 BP 858 EP 870 DI 10.17323/1813-8918-2021-4-858-870 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Larsen, MH Lund, MS AF Larsen, Marie Haugli Lund, Mass Soldal TI Cyber Risk Perception in the Maritime Domain: A Systematic Literature Review SO IEEE ACCESS LA English DT Review DE Safety; Cyberspace; Computer crime; Psychology; Bibliographies; Tools; Systematics; Maritime cyber security; risk perception; human behavior; psychometric paradigm; cognitive biases; marine safety; risk communication; cyberpsychology ID UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM; PERCEIVED CONTROLLABILITY; INFORMATION SECURITY; CYBERSECURITY; PRIVACY AB This paper aims to present an approach to investigate cyber risk perception with use of recognized psychological models, and to give an overview of state-of-the-art research within the field of cyber risk perception in general and in the context of the maritime domain. The focus will be on determinative dimensions within the psychometric paradigm and cognitive biases, and to give recommendations on further research within these fields. Okoli and Schabram's eight-step guide to plan, select, extract, and execute a systematic literature review is used as guidance. The search process resulted in 25 relevant articles which describes 24 dimensions of cyber risk perception in different online environments. Research within the area of maritime cyber security is increasing, however, no studies relevant for our literature review were found within the maritime domain. The nine dimensions in the psychometric model, perceived benefit and the optimistic bias is presented and discussed in a maritime context. Cyber risk perception is a complex research-area where both determinative factors and other cognitive processes can be influenced by each other. This can indicate that the dimensions differ across populations and professions, creating grounds for why context-specific studies are important. Further research may benefit from more multidisciplinary, descriptive, and inductive approaches, and contextual studies within maritime cyber risk perception can contribute to develop targeted tools for risk mitigation to enhance safety at sea. C1 [Larsen, Marie Haugli] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ocean Operat & Civil Engn, N-6025 Alesund, Norway. [Lund, Mass Soldal] Norwegian Def Univ Coll, Cyber Acad, N-2617 Lillehammer, Norway. [Lund, Mass Soldal] BI Norwegian Business Sch, Dept Econ, N-0484 Oslo, Norway. C3 Norwegian University of Science & Technology (NTNU); Norwegian Defence University College; BI Norwegian Business School RP Larsen, MH (corresponding author), Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ocean Operat & Civil Engn, N-6025 Alesund, Norway. EM marie.h.larsen@ntnu.no FU Research Based Innovation Centre "SFI Marine Operation in Virtual Environment (SFI-MOVE)'' by the Norwegian Research Council [237929] FX This work was supported by the Grant from the Research Based Innovation Centre ``SFI Marine Operation in Virtual Environment (SFI-MOVE)'' by the Norwegian Research Council under Project 237929. CR Alcaide J. I., 2020, TRANSPORTATION RES P, V45, P547, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TRPRO.2020.03.058 ALHAKAMI AS, 1994, RISK ANAL, V14, P1085, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x Ancis J. R, 2020, TECHNOLOGY MIND BEHA, V1, P1, DOI [10.1037/tmb0000009, DOI 10.1037/TMB0000009] [Anonymous], 1978, INT CONV STAND TRAIN [Anonymous], 2019, CYBERSECURITY CULTUR, DOI [10.2824/324042, DOI 10.2824/324042] [Anonymous], 2017, GUID CYB SEC ONB SHI [Anonymous], 1974, INT CONV SAF LIF SEA Avizienis A, 2004, IEEE T DEPEND SECURE, V1, P11, DOI 10.1109/TDSC.2004.2 Bada Maria., 2020, EMERGING CYBER THREA, P73, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-816203-3.00004-6, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-816203-3.00004-6] Baraniuk Chris, 2017, BBC NEWS Bateman T., 2013, BBC NEWS LONDON UK Campbell J, 2007, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V23, P1273, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.005 Cho HC, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.012 COMBS B, 1979, JOURNALISM QUART, V56, P837, DOI 10.1177/107769907905600420 de Smidt G, 2018, GENEVA PAP R I-ISS P, V43, P239, DOI 10.1057/s41288-018-0082-7 DiRenzo J, 2015, 2015 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION, INTELLIGENCE, SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (IISA) Erstad E, 2021, TRANSNAV, V15, P27, DOI 10.12716/1001.15.01.01 Farahmand Fariborz, 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE), P462, DOI 10.1109/CSE.2009.449 Farahmand F, 2008, P ICIS, P25 Farahmand F, 2013, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V60, P238, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2012.2185801 Farahmand F, 2013, INFORM SYST FRONT, V15, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10796-010-9265-x FISCHHOFF B, 1978, POLICY SCI, V9, P127, DOI 10.1007/BF00143739 Fitton O., 2015, FUTURE MARITIME CYBE Frewer L.J., 2011, J RISK RES, V1, P221, DOI [10.1080/136698798377141, DOI 10.1080/136698798377141] FuturenauticsMaritime KVH and Intelsat, 2018, CREW CONN 2018 SURV Gabriel I. J., 2008, P 41 ANN HAW INT C S, P274 Garcia-Hernandez A, 2017, STARCH-STARKE, V69, DOI 10.1002/star.201600308 Garg Vaibhav, 2012, Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Proceedings 12th International Symposium, PETS 2012, P279, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-31680-7_15 Garg V., 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), P3278, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2012.245 Garg V., 2014, P 42 RES C COMM INF, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2411672, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2411672] Garg V, 2015, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V7807, P280, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-27659-5_20 Grech M., 2008, HUMAN FACTORS MARITI Haltinner K, 2016, COMM COM INF SC, V589, P69, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28313-5_6 Hareide OS, 2018, J NAVIGATION, V71, P1025, DOI 10.1017/S0373463318000164 Harris P, 1996, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V15, P9, DOI 10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.9 He W, 2019, J ORG COMP ELECT COM, V29, P249, DOI 10.1080/10919392.2019.1611528 Herrero J, 2017, J RISK RES, V20, P1466, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2016.1153504 Howard MC, 2015, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V18, P181, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2014.0418 Huang DL, 2010, BEHAV INFORM TECHNOL, V29, P221, DOI 10.1080/01449290701679361 IMO, 2017, GUID MAR CYB RISK MA Kahneman D., 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511809477 Kahneman D., 2011, THINKING, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000626 KnowBe4, 2019, 2019 WHAT KEEPS YOU Kostyuk N, 2021, J GLOB SECUR STUD, V6, DOI 10.1093/jogss/ogz077 Kristoffersen P.B., 2015, DIGITALE SARBARHETER Kumar V, 2019, AIP CONF PROC, V2177, DOI 10.1063/1.5135282 LeBlanc D., 2012, 2012 Tenth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST), P88, DOI 10.1109/PST.2012.6297924 Lehto M., 2020, COMPUTATION BIG DATA, P19, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-37752-6_2 McCall R., 2011, PRESENCE TELEOPERATO, V20, P502 McCombs M. G, 1986, PERSPECTIVE MEDIA EF, P1 McGillivary P, 2018, MAR TECHNOL SOC J, V52, P44, DOI 10.4031/MTSJ.52.5.11 Meland PH, 2021, TRANSNAV, V15, P519, DOI 10.12716/1001.15.03.04 Mrakovic I, 2019, TRANS MARIT SCI-TOMS, V8, P132, DOI 10.7225/toms.v08.n01.013 Nurse J. R. C., 2011, 2011 Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust, P60, DOI 10.1109/STAST.2011.6059257 Okoli C., 2010, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS Refsdal A, 2015, CYBER RISK MANAGEMEN, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23570-7_5 Renn O, 2004, TOXICOL LETT, V149, P405, DOI 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.051 Rhee HS, 2012, COMPUT SECUR, V31, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2011.12.001 Roeser S., 2012, HDB RISK THEORY EPIS SafetyatSea and BIMCO, 2019, CYB SEC WHIT PAP Short JF, 2004, J RISK RES, V7, P135, DOI 10.1080/1366987042000171276 Siegrist M, 2005, RISK ANAL, V25, P211, DOI 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00580.x Sjoberg L, 2001, RISK ANAL, V21, P427, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.213123 Sjoberg L., 2012, HDB RISK THEORY, P662 Sjoberg L., 2003, RISK MANAGEMENT, V5, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.RM.8240154, 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240154] Sjoberg L., 2004, ROTUNDE, V84, P55 Sjoberg L, 2005, MANAGEMENT UNCERTAIN, P57 Sjoberg L., 2004, RISK MANAGE, V6, P51, DOI [DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.RM.8240172, 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240172] Skotnes RO, 2015, SAF SCI MONIT, V19 SLOVIC P, 1987, SCIENCE, V236, P280, DOI 10.1126/science.3563507 Slovic P., 1990, THEORIES OF RISK Spencer T, 2016, RISK PERCEPTION STARR C, 1969, SCIENCE, V165, P1232, DOI 10.1126/science.165.3899.1232 TVERSKY A, 1973, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V5, P207, DOI 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 van Schaik P, 2020, COMPUT SECUR, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2019.101651 van Schaik P, 2018, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V78, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.007 van Schaik P, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V75, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.038 von Solms R, 2013, COMPUT SECUR, V38, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2013.04.004 Wang J, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11051368 WEINSTEIN ND, 1980, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V39, P806, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 Weinstein ND, 2005, TOB CONTROL, V14, P55, DOI 10.1136/tc.2004.008375 WEINSTEIN ND, 1995, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V14, P132, DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.132 Weinstein ND, 1996, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V15, P1, DOI 10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.1 WEINSTEIN ND, 1987, J BEHAV MED, V10, P481, DOI 10.1007/BF00846146 Whitman M. E, MANAGEMENT INFORM SE, V6th Xu W, 2021, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106851 NR 87 TC 5 Z9 5 PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC PI PISCATAWAY PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA PY 2021 VL 9 BP 144895 EP 144905 DI 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3122433 WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Engineering, Electrical & Electronic; Telecommunications SC Computer Science; Engineering; Telecommunications ER PT J AU Navarro, R Larranaga, E Yubero, S Villora, B AF Navarro, Raul Larranaga, Elisa Yubero, Santiago Villora, Beatriz TI Individual, interpersonal and relationship factors associated with ghosting intention and behaviors in adult relationships: Examining the associations over and above being a recipient of ghosting SO TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS LA English DT Article DE Ghosting; Cyberpsychology; Dating relationships; Relationship dissolution; Moral disengagement; Conflict resolutions styles ID CONFLICT-RESOLUTION STYLES; RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION; ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS; MORAL DISENGAGEMENT; MODERATING ROLE; SELF-EFFICACY; AGGRESSION; TECHNOLOGY; ATTACHMENT; VIOLENCE AB Ghosting is a relationship dissolution strategy in which the ghoster elects to cease all forms of communication with their partner without explanation. The partner tends to be unaware that they are being ghosted. As a result, the ghosted partner is left to manage and understand what lack of his/her partner's communication means. The present study was designed to explore if people who are ghosted are more likely to ghost others by analyzing to what extent ghosting initiation is correlated with ghosting victimization, and by also examining to what extent intentions to ghost are related to ghosting behaviors (both being ghosted and being a ghoster). It also examined the relations between ghosting initiation behavior and intention and individual, interpersonal and relationship factors, such as self-esteem, sense of power, moral disengagement, assertiveness, empathy concern and conflict resolution styles. Data were collected from 626 adults (mean age = 29.64 years; SD = 8.84) using online surveys. This study confirmed a close connection between ghosting initiation and ghosting victimization, and a moderate one between ghosting initiation and intentions to ghost. However, the majority of the examined factors did not correlate with ghosting behavior and intention, or displayed weak relations. The present findings suggest that ghosting is an emerging phenomenon in modern communication that warrants further investigation. C1 [Navarro, Raul; Larranaga, Elisa; Yubero, Santiago; Villora, Beatriz] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Dept Psychol, Cuenca, Ecuador. RP Navarro, R (corresponding author), Univ Castilla La Mancha, Dept Psychol, Cuenca, Ecuador. EM raul.navarro@uclm.es CR Abbasi IS, 2018, AM J FAM THER, V46, P375, DOI 10.1080/01926187.2018.1540283 Abell L, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V36, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.076 Ahlin B, 2014, SMALL BUS ECON, V43, P101, DOI 10.1007/s11187-013-9531-7 Ajzen I, 2002, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V32, P665, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x AJZEN I, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V50, P179, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Ajzen I., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU Anderson C, 2012, J PERS, V80, P313, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x Baker CK, 2016, J CHILD FAM STUD, V25, P308, DOI 10.1007/s10826-015-0196-5 Bandura A, 1996, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V71, P364, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.125 Bandura A, 1999, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, V3, P193, DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO, VVolume 28 Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI Barkham M, 1996, BRIT J CLIN PSYCHOL, V35, P21, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01159.x Bonache H, 2019, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE, V34, P287, DOI 10.1177/0886260516640776 Bonache H, 2016, INT J CLIN HLTH PSYC, V16, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.03.003 Borrajo E, 2015, PSYCHOL REP, V116, P565, DOI 10.2466/21.16.PR0.116k22w4 Bowlby J., 1979, MAKING BREAKING AFFE Bravo V, 2017, EMERG ADULTHOOD, V5, P230, DOI 10.1177/2167696817700261 Brewer G, 2017, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V106, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.001 BUELGA S, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI DOI 10.3390/IJERPH17093090. Bylsma WH, 1997, BASIC APPL SOC PSYCH, V19, P1, DOI 10.1207/s15324834basp1901_1 Cava MJ, 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106449 CAVA MJ, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI DOI 10.3390/IJERPH17124269. Cho SJ, 2017, CHILD YOUTH SERV REV, V79, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.016 Chotpitayasunondh V, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V63, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018 Collins TJ, 2012, J RES PERS, V46, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.008 Cook K, 2020, PSYCHOL SILICON VALL, P197 Craft S., 2016, EMOTIONS TECHNOLOGY, P211, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-801737-1.00010-X., DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-801737-1.00010-X.] Cronan TP, 2008, J BUS ETHICS, V78, P527, DOI 10.1007/s10551-007-9366-8 Cronan TP, 2018, J BUS ETHICS, V147, P197, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2988-3 Crothers LM, 2005, J COUNS DEV, V83, P349, DOI 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00354.x Curtis DS, 2017, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE, V32, P1187, DOI 10.1177/0886260515588524 DAVIS MH, 1983, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V44, P113, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 Espelage DL, 2018, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V47, P2401, DOI 10.1007/s10964-018-0910-x Espinosa Sierra V., 2017, J BEHAV HLTH SOCIAL, V9, P27, DOI [10.1016/j.jbhsi.2018.01.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JBHSI.2018.01.001.] Farrell C, 2017, J CRIM JUST, V53, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.09.004 Fincham FD, 2017, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V13, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.008 Fishben M., 1975, BELIEF ATTITUDE INTE Fiske S. T., 2007, SOCIAL PSYCHOL HDB B, V2, P678 Fox J, 2016, PSYCHOLOGY OF SOCIAL NETWORKING: PERSONAL EXPERIENCE IN ONLINE COMMUNITIES, P78 Freedman G, 2019, J SOC PERS RELAT, V36, P905, DOI 10.1177/0265407517748791 Fry Richard, 2017, SHARE AM LIVING PART Godbout N, 2017, PSYCHOL TRAUMA-US, V9, P127, DOI 10.1037/tra0000136 Goldstein SE, 2011, PERS RELATIONSHIP, V18, P645, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01329.x GOMEZLOPEZ M, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI DOI 10.3390/IJERPH16132415. Guazzini A, 2019, FUTURE INTERNET, V11, DOI 10.3390/fi11010021 Hastings RP., 2013, INT J POSITIVE BEHAV, V3, P5 Hawley PH, 1999, DEV REV, V19, P97, DOI 10.1006/drev.1998.0470 Honicke T, 2016, EDUC RES REV-NETH, V17, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002 Hyde LW, 2010, J ABNORM CHILD PSYCH, V38, P197, DOI 10.1007/s10802-009-9358-5 INE, 2019, ENC CONT HOG 2018 Kato T, 2016, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V95, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.050 Keysar B, 2008, PSYCHOL SCI, V19, P1280, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02223.x Khosravi F., 2020, REV TURISMO ESTUDOS, V3, P1 Koessler R, 2019, COLLABRA-PSYCHOL, V5, DOI 10.1525/collabra.230 KURDEK LA, 1994, J MARRIAGE FAM, V56, P705, DOI 10.2307/352880 Lantagne A, 2017, EMERG ADULTHOOD, V5, P241, DOI 10.1177/2167696817699750 Lapierre M. A., 2019, PSYCHOL POPULAR MEDI, DOI [10.1037/ppm0000230, DOI 10.1037/PPM0000230.] Larranaga E, 2018, COMUNICAR, V26, P19, DOI 10.3916/C56-2018-02 LAZARUS AA, 1973, BEHAV THER, V4, P697, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7894(73)80161-3 Le B, 2010, PERS RELATIONSHIP, V17, P377, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x LeFebvre L.E., 2019, CLIN PRACTICE, V39, P125, DOI [10.1177/0276236618820519., DOI 10.1177/0276236618820519.] LeFebvre L:E., 2017, W STAT COMM ASS C SA LeFebvre LE, 2020, J LOSS TRAUMA, V25, P395, DOI 10.1080/15325024.2019.1694299 Loudin JL, 2003, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V29, P430, DOI 10.1002/ab.10039 Lukacs V, 2015, INFORM COMMUN SOC, V18, P492, DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008540 Manning J., 2019, IT HAPPENED TINDER R, P114 Mao YN, 2018, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V35, P745, DOI 10.1007/s10490-017-9538-8 Martinez-Martinez A, 2018, REV PSICOL SOC, V33, P111, DOI 10.1080/02134748.2017.1385242 McKie RM, 2017, J HOMOSEXUAL, V64, P75, DOI 10.1080/00918369.2016.1172883 Moore P., 2014, POLL RESULTS GHOSTIN Morey JN, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P1771, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.019 Morris C. E., 2015, EVOL BEHAV SCI, V9, P270, DOI [10.1037/ebs0000054, DOI 10.1037/EBS0000054] Palermiti AL, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V69, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.026 Perez-Albeniz A, 2003, PSICOTHEMA, V15, P267 RAGAZ J, 2014, J CLIN ONCOL S, V32 Robins RW, 2001, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V27, P151, DOI 10.1177/0146167201272002 Sheeran P., 2002, EUR REV SOC PSYCHOL, V12, P1, DOI [10.1080/14792772143000003, DOI 10.1080/14792772143000003] Shortt JW, 2010, PARTN ABUSE, V1, P131, DOI 10.1891/1946-6560.1.2.131 Shu Q, 2011, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V27, P923, DOI 10.1080/10447318.2011.555313 Stacey FG, 2015, J CANCER SURVIV, V9, P305, DOI 10.1007/s11764-014-0413-z Taggart TC, 2019, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V139, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.036 Ulloa EC, 2017, FAM J, V25, P208, DOI 10.1177/1066480717710644 Villora B, 2019, FUTURE INTERNET, V11, DOI 10.3390/fi11040084 Villora B, 2019, BEHAV SCI-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/bs9040035 Waldeck D, 2017, J CONTEXT BEHAV SCI, V6, P425, DOI 10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.09.001 Wang B., 2014, THESIS Weber D, 2011, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE, V26, P2735, DOI 10.1177/0886260510388287 Welsh DP, 2008, J ADOLESCENCE, V31, P877, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.001 Willis GB, 2016, REV PSICOL SOC, V31, P554, DOI 10.1080/02134748.2016.1190131 Willis GB, 2010, ESTUD PSICOL-MADRID, V31, P279, DOI 10.1174/021093910793154402 Winter K, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-00745-0 Xia MY, 2018, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V47, P1499, DOI 10.1007/s10964-018-0815-8 Xiao BS., 2013, INT J BUSINESS INFOR, V8, P34, DOI [10.6702/IJBI.2013.8.1.2, DOI 10.6702/IJBI.2013.8.1.2] Zapor H, 2017, PARTN ABUSE, V8, P127, DOI 10.1891/1946-6560.8.2.127 NR 96 TC 7 Z9 7 PU ELSEVIER PI AMSTERDAM PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS PD MAR PY 2021 VL 57 AR 101513 DI 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101513 EA JAN 2021 WC Information Science & Library Science SC Information Science & Library Science ER PT J AU Efremova, MV AF Efremova, M. V. TI THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VALUES AND PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS BEFORE AND DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC SO PSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF THE HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS LA English DT Article DE prosocial behavior; individual values; online context; offline context; COVID-19 pandemic; cyberpsychology AB The COVID-19 pandemic has unprece-dentedly influenced social interactions, which can be implemented both in real life (offline) and on the Internet. Prosocial behavior as a type of social interactions has a positive impact on individuals and society, especially during crises. Prosocial behavior is determined by various factors, including individual values and contextu-al factors as the most influential ones. The form of prosocial behavior and its deter-minants may differ in different periods of the society functioning. Therefore, study-ing prosocial behavior before and during the pandemic, and identifying factors of its implementation in various contexts is a relevant task. This study explores the relationship between individual values and prosocial behavior, in an offline and an online context, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia. A cross-sectional study with two sub-samples - the "pre-pandemic" group (N=304) and the "pandemic" group (N=187) - was conducted online, using the short version of Human Values Scale by S. Schwartz (ESS-21) and scales of prosocial behavior in online and offline contexts. Results show that during a pandemic people are less likely to engage in prosocial behavior offline and rely less on Self-Trans -cendence values. At the same time, in "the pre-pandemic" group, Self-Transcendence values contribute to prosocial behavior in both contexts, while Self-Enhancement values contribute to prosocial behavior in the online context. Next, in the "pandem-ic" group, Self-Transcendence values and Openness-to-Change values promote prosocial behavior in both contexts, while Conservation values discourage it. The results are discussed regarding the impact a pandemic has on people's lives. C1 [Efremova, M. V.] HSE Univ, 20 Myasnitskaya Str, Moscow 101000, Russia. C3 HSE University (National Research University Higher School of Economics) RP Efremova, MV (corresponding author), HSE Univ, 20 Myasnitskaya Str, Moscow 101000, Russia. EM mefremova@hse.ru FU Russian Science Foundation [N 19-18-00169] FX The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project N 19-18-00169, https://rscf.ru/project/19-18-00169 CR [Авдеева Дарья Александровна Avdeeva Daria], 2019, [Общественные науки и современность, Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'], P79, DOI 10.31857/S086904990005087-7 Bardi A, 2003, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V29, P1207, DOI 10.1177/0146167203254602 Bonetto E, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0253430 Caprara GV, 2007, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V26, P218, DOI 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.2.218 Daniel E, 2022, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V13, P572, DOI 10.1177/19485506211024026 Daniel E, 2015, INT J PSYCHOL, V50, P186, DOI 10.1002/ijop.12086 Efremova MV, 2020, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V11, P107, DOI 10.17759/sps.2020110107 Feigin S., 2014, ANN NEUROSCIENCE PSY, V1, P5, DOI [10.7243/2055-3447-1-5, DOI 10.7243/2055-3447-1-5] Gritsenko VV, 2014, PSIKHOL ZH, V35, P56 Haller E, 2022, FRONT PSYCHOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775032 Hellmann DM, 2021, HELIYON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08041 Jensen, 2015, HDB CHILD PSYCHOL, P1, DOI [10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy315, DOI 10.1002/9781118963418.CHILDPSY315] Jiang HB, 2017, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V104, P493, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.005 Kesberg R, 2021, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110313 Levin D. B., 2002, YALE J LAW TECHNOLOG, V4, P97 Schuster C, 2019, Z PSYCHOL, V227, P42, DOI 10.1027/2151-2604/a000355 Schwartz SH, 1997, POLIT PSYCHOL, V18, P385, DOI 10.1111/0162-895X.00062 SCHWARTZ SH, 1992, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V25, P1, DOI 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 Shoss MK, 2021, GROUP ORGAN MANAGE, V46, P3, DOI 10.1177/1059601120968704 Siegel JT, 2010, PSYCHOL HEALTH MED, V15, P198, DOI 10.1080/13548501003623922 Tabernero C, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0238682 Terrier C, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI [10.1073/pnas.2110891118j1of6, 10.1073/pnas.2110891118] Twenge JM, 2007, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V92, P56, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56 NR 23 TC 0 Z9 0 PU NATL RES UNIV HIGHER EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA NATL RES UNIV HIGHER EDUCATION, MOSCOW, 00000, RUSSIA PY 2023 VL 20 IS 1 BP 40 EP 48 DI 10.17323/1813-8918-2023-1-40-48 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Popper-Giveon, A Keshet, Y AF Popper-Giveon, Ariela Keshet, Yael TI Layers of senses: Experiencing intercorporeality in teletherapy SO HEALTH LA English DT Article; Early Access DE intercorporeality; interpersonal communication; Israel; multisensory approach; spiritual caregivers; teletherapy AB Teletherapy, namely, therapy that uses technology for communication between patients and therapists, is challenged by the impersonal nature of remote and digital communication. Using Merleau-Ponty's theoretical concept of intercorporeality, which refers to the perceived reciprocity between two people's bodies during communication, this article aims to elaborate on spiritual caregivers' experience of interacting with patients during teletherapy. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 Israeli spiritual caregivers who use various forms of teletherapy (Zoom, FaceTime, phone calls, WhatsApp messages, etc.). Interviewees emphasized their physical presence with the patient as a main principle in spiritual care. They indicated the involvement of nearly all senses in physical presence therapy, which allows for joint attention and compassionate presence. When making use of various communication technologies in teletherapy, they reported the involvement of fewer senses. The more senses involved in the session and the clearer it is that space and time are shared by both caregiver and patient, the stronger the caregiver's presence with the patient. Interviewees experienced teletherapy as eroding the multisensory joint attention and intercorporeality and, hence, the quality of care. This article points at the advantages of teletherapy for therapists in general and spiritual caregivers in particular but claims, nonetheless, that it challenges the main principles of therapy. Joint attention in therapy is, fundamentally, a multisensory phenomenon that may be understood as intercorporeality. Our use of the notion of intercorporeality sheds light on the reduction of the senses involved in remote interpersonal communication and its impact on care and, more generally, the interpersonal communication experienced during telemedicine. This article's findings may also contribute to the field of cyberpsychology and to therapists engaged in telepsychology. C1 [Popper-Giveon, Ariela] David Yellin Acad Coll, Jerusalem, Israel. [Keshet, Yael] Western Galilee Acad Coll, Hlth & Wellbeing Studies Program, Akko, Israel. [Popper-Giveon, Ariela] David Yellin Acad Coll, POB 3578, IL-91035 Jerusalem, Israel. RP Popper-Giveon, A (corresponding author), David Yellin Acad Coll, POB 3578, IL-91035 Jerusalem, Israel. EM giveon@dyellin.ac.il FU Western Galilee Academic College FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research was funded by the Western Galilee Academic College. CR Almog R., 2021, HLTH SOCIAL CARE CHA, V9, P113 American Psychological Association, 2009, APA CONC DICT PSYCH Association for Spiritual Care in Israel, 2022, QUAL SPIR CAR ISR Austerlic S., 2009, CULTURAL HUMILITY CO Battich L, 2020, PSYCHON B REV, V27, P1126, DOI 10.3758/s13423-020-01766-z Braun V., 2006, QUALITATIVE RES PSYC, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA] Byrne M. J., 2020, HLTH SOCIAL CARE CHA, V8, P206, DOI [10.1558/hscc.41625, DOI 10.1558/HSCC.41625] Connolly SL, 2020, CLIN PSYCHOL-SCI PR, V27, DOI 10.1111/cpsp.12311 EKMAN P, 1980, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V39, P1125, DOI 10.1037/h0077722 Francesetti G., 2020, GESTALT REV, V24, P113, DOI [10.5325/gestaltreview.24.2.0113, DOI 10.5325/GESTALTREVIEW.24.2.0113] Ghosh G J, 1997, J Telemed Telecare, V3 Suppl 1, P33, DOI 10.1258/1357633971930283 Handzo G, 2022, J HEALTH CARE CHAPL, V28, P194, DOI 10.1080/08854726.2020.1818359 Handzo GF, 2008, J HEALTH CARE CHAPL, V14, P39, DOI 10.1080/08854720802053853 Harrison HF, 2019, NURS PHILOS, V20, DOI 10.1111/nup.12241 Kerr CE, 2013, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00012 Koper I, 2019, BMC PALLIAT CARE, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12904-019-0484-8 Lin T, 2021, PSYCHOTHERAPY, V58, P449, DOI 10.1037/pst0000398 Merleau-Ponty M., 2012, PHENOMENOLOGY PERCEP, DOI 10.4324/9780203720714 Merleau-Ponty M., 1964, SIGNS, P159 Merleau-Ponty M., 2004, M MERLEAUPONTY BASIC Papadopoulos I, 2021, J RELIG HEALTH, V60, P2209, DOI 10.1007/s10943-021-01254-1 Schlief M, 2022, medRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2022.03.21.22272706, DOI 10.1101/2022.03.21.22272706] Sprik P, 2021, SUPPORT CARE CANCER, V29, P1275, DOI 10.1007/s00520-020-05598-4 Swift Chris., 2020, HLTH SOCIAL CARE CHA, V8, P154, DOI 10.1558/hscc.41870 Tanaka S., 2014, ACAD QUARTER, V9, P265 Tanaka S., 2013, B LIBERAL ARTS ED CT, V33, P101 Tanaka S, 2017, THEOR PSYCHOL, V27, P337, DOI 10.1177/0959354317702543 Tanaka S, 2015, THEOR PSYCHOL, V25, P455, DOI 10.1177/0959354315583035 Winiger F, 2023, J HEALTH CARE CHAPL, V29, P114, DOI 10.1080/08854726.2022.2040895 NR 29 TC 0 Z9 0 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD PI LONDON PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND PD 2023 MAR 13 PY 2023 DI 10.1177/13634593231156811 EA MAR 2023 WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Social Sciences, Biomedical SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Biomedical Social Sciences ER PT J AU Voiskounsky, AE Smyslova, OV AF Voiskounsky, A. E. Smyslova, O. V. TI CYBERSICKNESS IN VIRTUAL REALITY: KEY FACTORS AND SENSORY INTEGRATION SO PSIKHOLOGICHESKII ZHURNAL LA Russian DT Article DE virtual reality; immersion; simulator disorder; motion sickness; cybersickness; presence; integration of sensor signals; out-of-body experience AB The article provides an overview of cybersickness, also known as a simulator sickness. Phenomenology of cybersickness often accompanies the use of virtual or augmented reality systems. The factors that are supposedly contributing to the emergence of cybersickness, including the technical parameters of virtual reality systems, the individual characteristics of particular users of such systems and the specifics of the tasks they perform, including the phenomena of presence and multitasking, are analyzed. As a promising direction in the search for one of the probable root causes of cybersickness, the issues related to the psychological mechanisms of the integration of multisensor information are discussed in detail. This research area has been actively developing over the past two decades and is associated with the appearance (including through the use of the virtual reality methodology) of sensory illusions (visual, auditory, tactile, kinesthetic) and with the registration of human behavior in situations when the body image seems to be changed. The corresponding phenomena have already received the metaphorical names "out-of-body experience", or "rubber arm". Specialists in cognitive sciences, anatomy and neurophysiology of the brain, neuropsychology, philosophy, cyberpsychology, computer science in general and computer graphics in particular, as well as medical prosthetics are interested in solving relevant research problems. Based on available sources in which attempts are made to fix the center of multisensory integration, suggestions are made about its localization in the brain. Promising measures aimed at reducing the likelihood of cybersickness are being considered. C1 [Voiskounsky, A. E.] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Psychol Dept, Mokhovaya Str 11, Moscow 125009, Russia. [Smyslova, O. V.] UserLyt Corp, Foster City, CA 94404 USA. C3 Lomonosov Moscow State University RP Voiskounsky, AE (corresponding author), Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Psychol Dept, Mokhovaya Str 11, Moscow 125009, Russia. EM vae-msu@mail.ru; olga@smyslova.com FU Russian Science Foundation, Lomonosov Moscow State University [18-18-00365] FX The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No 18-18-00365, "Digital socialization in the cultural historical perspective: intragenerational and intergenerational analysis", Lomonosov Moscow State University. CR Acikel BY, 2018, SIMULAT GAMING, V49, P27, DOI 10.1177/1046878117750417 Arina G.A., 2014, PSIHOLOGICHESKIE ISS, V7 Averbukh NV, 2011, PSYCHOL-J HIGH SCH E, V8, P102 Averbukh NV, 2010, VOP PSIKHOL+, P105 Bauer A, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00712 Blanke O, 2012, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V13, P556, DOI 10.1038/nrn3292 Bockelman P., 2017, HCI INT 2017 POST, V714, P3, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-58753-0_1 Botvinick M, 1998, NATURE, V391, P756, DOI 10.1038/35784 Brechet L, 2018, FRONT BEHAV NEUROSCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00270 Ehrsson HH, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P1048, DOI 10.1126/science.1142175 Ehrsson HH, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P875, DOI 10.1126/science.1097011 Hildebrandt J., 2018, LECT NOTES COMPUTER Ignatev M.B., 2009, ARHITEKTURA VIRTUALN Iskenderova A, 2017, CHI PLAY'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION IN PLAY, P561, DOI 10.1145/3116595.3116618 JOSEPH R, 1982, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V38, P4, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<4::AID-JCLP2270380102>3.0.CO;2-J Keshavarz B, 2011, DISPLAYS, V32, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.displa.2011.05.009 Kim HG, 2017, VRST'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ACM SYMPOSIUM ON VIRTUAL REALITY SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY, DOI 10.1145/3139131.3139137 Kovalev AI, 2015, EKSP PSIKHOLOGIYA, V8, P45, DOI 10.17759/exppsy.2015080205 Kovalev A. I., 2017, SPORTIVNYJ PSIHOLOG, V46, P4 La Viola J. J. Jr., 2000, SIGCHI Bulletin, V32, P47, DOI 10.1145/333329.333344 Lenggenhager B, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P1096, DOI 10.1126/science.1143439 Limanowski J, 2014, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00946 Liu CL, 2014, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V72, P796, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.07.002 Melo M, 2018, COMPUT GRAPH-UK, V71, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.cag.2017.11.007 Menshikova GY, 2017, PSYCHOL RUSS, V10, P151, DOI 10.11621/pir.2017.0310 Mittelstaedt J, 2018, DISPLAYS, V51, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.displa.2018.01.002 Munafo J, 2017, EXP BRAIN RES, V235, P889, DOI 10.1007/s00221-016-4846-7 Petkova VI, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003832 Pot-Kolder R, 2018, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V21, P187, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2017.0082 Pouke M, 2018, 25TH 2018 IEEE CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL REALITY AND 3D USER INTERFACES (VR), P665 Rebenitsch L, 2014, P 27 ANN ACM S USER, P309, DOI 10.1145/2642918.2647394 Rebenitsch L, 2016, VIRTUAL REAL-LONDON, V20, P101, DOI 10.1007/s10055-016-0285-9 Rohde M, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021659 Rosa PJ, 2016, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V19, P209, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2015.0130 Settgast V, 2016, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V9926, P115, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46100-7_10 Shafer DM, 2019, GAMES HEALTH J, V8, P15, DOI 10.1089/g4h.2017.0190 Slater M, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010564 Smith AM, 2014, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00070 Smyslova OV, 2019, PSIKHOL ZH, V40, P85, DOI 10.31857/S020595920005473-6 Stanney K, 1998, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V10, P135, DOI 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1002_3 Velichkovskij B.B, 2014, NACL PSIHOLOGICHESKI, P31 Vinson N. G., 2012, P GRAPHICS INTERFACE, P69 Visch VT, 2010, COGNITION EMOTION, V24, P1439, DOI 10.1080/02699930903498186 Vojskunskij A.E., 2010, PSIHOLOGIJA INTERNET NR 44 TC 1 Z9 1 PU MEZHDUNARODNAYA KNIGA PI MOSCOW PA 39 DIMITROVA UL., MOSCOW, 113095, RUSSIA PD JAN-FEB PY 2020 VL 41 IS 1 BP 56 EP 64 DI 10.31857/S020595920007882-6 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Cesari, E AF Cesari, E. TI The use of art therapy in the context of a dissociative fugue SO EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & DISSOCIATION LA French DT Article DE Art therapy; Dissociation; Dissociative fugue; Cyberpsychology; Theory of the trauma AB Introduction. - Studies on post-traumatic stress disorder with dissociative subtype (PTSD + DS) have proved successful and there is now a need to develop treatments that focus on dissociation. We were interested in a post-traumatic symptom: the dissociative fugue. In the acting-out clinic, art therapy offers creative process methods that focus on emotions. Objective. - While following a dissociative runaway the "mental level" of the person remains frozen, art therapy should allow the awareness for its reactivation and gradually the self-management of these runaways. Method. - We have detained two people disturbed by dissociative runaways. One of them has been sexually abused since childhood and we support her on an art therapy blog. The other is a migrant person housed in an emergency centre of the Aurore association where we provide art therapy workshops. Results. - The major contributions of this care process are at the conceptual, physical and motor levels. Dissociative fugues were recognized by both subjects. The manipulation of shapes and colours has allowed them to undergo a beneficial transformation and recomposition, after crumbling towards a return and maintenance in the present time. Conclusion. - The contribution of these workshops allowed the updating of the different identity structures of the participants. The art therapeutic framework containing and well-treating supports the process of formalizing the unspeakable. Working in mirror with the art therapist therefore opens up access to self-management and the reduction of dissociative fugues. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. C1 [Cesari, E.] Paris PRES Sorbonne Cite Paris V Descartes, Paris, France. C3 UDICE-French Research Universities; Universite Paris Cite RP Cesari, E (corresponding author), Paris PRES Sorbonne Cite Paris V Descartes, Paris, France. EM emmanuelle.cesari@artherapievirtus.org CR Anzieu D., 1987, ENVELOPPES PSYCHIQUE, P1 Auxemery Y, 2019, EUR J TRAUMA DISSOC, DOI [10.1016/j.ejtd.2019.02.002, DOI 10.1016/J.EJTD.2019.02.002] Auxemery Y, 2017, ANN MED-PSYCHOL, V175, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.amp.2017.02.006 Baudin G, 2020, EUR J TRAUMA DISSOC, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.ejtd.2018.12.003 Becker CLJ, 2015, ART THER, V32, P190, DOI 10.1080/07421656.2015.1091643 Bloch, 1939, SOC FEODALE BMP, 2018, BEA AD QUI DOIT PASS BMP, 2017, REPR DESS MOT DER RE Brown Richard J, 2006, J Trauma Dissociation, V7, P7, DOI 10.1300/J229v07n04_02 Brun A, 2014, PSYCHIAT ENFANT, V57, P437, DOI 10.3917/psye.572.0437 Campbell M, 2016, ART THER, V33, P169, DOI 10.1080/07421656.2016.1226643 Cesari E, 2018, EUR J TRAUMA DISSOC, V2, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.ejtd.2018.06.002 Damasio A., 2011, SCHOLARPEDIA, V6, P1804, DOI [DOI 10.4249/SCHOLARPEDIA.1804, DOI 10.4249/SCH0LARPEDIA.1804] Eren N, 2014, ART PSYCHOTHER, V41, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.aip.2014.06.004 Haeyen S, 2015, ART PSYCHOTHER, V45, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.aip.2015.04.005 Holmes EA, 2005, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V25, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.08.006 Janet P., 1891, LETAT MENTAL HYSTERI JANET P, 1909, NEVROSES Janet P., 1889, LAUTOMATISME PSYCHOL Jung C. G, 2001, PSYCHOGENESE MALADIE Jung CG, 1907, PSYCHOL DEMENTIA PRA Kedia M., 2012, DISSOCIATION MEMOIRE Lachal C., 2007, J PSYCHOL, V253, P50 Laroque F, 2015, ANN MED-PSYCHOL, V173, P541, DOI 10.1016/j.amp.2015.05.003 Lecourt E., 2014, PSYCHOSOMATIQUE RELA, V2, P61, DOI [10.3917/psyr.141.0061, DOI 10.3917/PSYR.141.0061] Malchiodi C., 2017, WHAT CHILDREN CLAM P, P197 Ravit M, 2010, PSYCHOL CLIN PROJECT, V16, P29, DOI [10.3917/pcp.016.0029, DOI 10.3917/PCP.016.0029] Saglio-Yatzimirsky MC, 2018, VOIX CEUX QUI CRIENT Saillot I, 2017, EUR J TRAUMA DISSOC, V1, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.ejtd.2017.06.002 Schiavone F. L., 2018, PTSD RES Q, V29 Van der Hart O., 2014, GERER DISSOCIATION O Van der Hart O., 2010, SOI HANTE DISSOCIATI van der Kolk B, 2018, CORPS NOUBLIE RIEN C Vandevoorde J, 2015, EVOL PSYCHIATR, V80, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.evopsy.2014.09.002 Winnicott D, 2015, J PSYCHANALYSE ENFAN, V5, P29, DOI [10.3917/jpe.010.0029, DOI 10.3917/JPE.010.0029] NR 35 TC 3 Z9 3 PU ELSEVIER PI AMSTERDAM PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS PD SEP PY 2021 VL 5 IS 3 AR 100130 DI 10.1016/j.ejtd.2019.100130 EA SEP 2021 WC Psychology, Clinical; Psychiatry SC Psychology; Psychiatry ER PT J AU Barach, E Feldman, LB Sheridan, H AF Barach, Eliza Feldman, Laurie Beth Sheridan, Heather TI Are emojis processed like words?: Eye movements reveal the time course of semantic processing for emojified text SO PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW LA English DT Article DE Emojis; Eye movements and reading; Reading models; Parafoveal processing ID PREVIEW BENEFIT; SACCADE GENERATION; DYNAMICAL MODEL; EMOTICONS; PLAUSIBILITY; INFORMATION; FRAMEWORK; ENGLISH AB Emojis have many functions that support reading. Most obviously, they convey semantic information and support reading comprehension (Lo, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11[5], 595-597, 2008; Riordan, Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 75-86, 2017b). However, it is undetermined whether emojis recruit the same perceptual and cognitive processes for identification and integration during reading as do words. To investigate whether emojis are processed like words, we used eye tracking to examine the time course of semantic processing of emojis during reading. Materials consisted of sentences containing a target word (e.g., coffee in the sentence "My tall coffee is just the right temperature") when there was no emoji present and when there was a semantically congruent (i.e., synonymous) emoji (e.g., the cup of coffee emoji, ) or an incongruent emoji (e.g., the beer mug emoji, ) present at the end of the sentence. Similar to congruency effects with words, congruent emojis were fixated for shorter periods and were less likely to be refixated than were incongruent emojis. In addition, congruent emojis were more frequently skipped than incongruent emojis, which suggests that semantic aspects of emoji processing begin in the parafovea. Finally, the presence of an emoji, relative to its absence increased target-word skipping rates and reduced total time on target words. We discuss the implications of our findings for models of eye-movement control during reading. C1 [Barach, Eliza; Feldman, Laurie Beth; Sheridan, Heather] SUNY Albany, Dept Psychol, 1400 Washington Ave, Albany, NY 12222 USA. C3 State University of New York (SUNY) System; State University of New York (SUNY) Albany RP Barach, E (corresponding author), SUNY Albany, Dept Psychol, 1400 Washington Ave, Albany, NY 12222 USA. EM ebarach@albany.edu CR Barr DJ, 2013, J MEM LANG, V68, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 Brysbaert M, 2009, BEHAV RES METHODS, V41, P977, DOI 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 Cohn N., 2018, P 40 ANN C COGN SCI, P1524 Cohn N, 2016, COGNITION, V146, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.007 Cramer H, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION WITH MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICES (MOBILEHCI'16), P504, DOI 10.1145/2935334.2935370 Dimigen O, 2012, NEUROIMAGE, V62, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.006 Dresner E, 2010, COMMUN THEOR, V20, P249, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x Drieghe D., 2011, OXFORD HDB EYE MOVEM, P839, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199539789.013.0046 Engbert R, 2005, PSYCHOL REV, V112, P777, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777 Engbert R, 2002, VISION RES, V42, P621, DOI 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00301-7 Feldman L. B., 2017, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V40 Gawne, 2018, 1 INT WORKSH EM UND Goldin-Meadow S, 2013, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V64, P257, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143802 Gustafsson V., 2017, USCCS TILB NETH, P73 Hilverman, 2018, ANN M PSCYCH SOC 201 Hohenstein S, 2014, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V40, P166, DOI 10.1037/a0033670 Kelly R, 2015, C SESSION EXPERIEN KUTAS M, 1980, SCIENCE, V207, P203, DOI 10.1126/science.7350657 Lo SK, 2008, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V11, P595, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.0132 Naaman N., 2017, P ACL 2017 STUDENT R, P136, DOI [10.18653/v1/P17-3022, DOI 10.18653/V1/P17-3022] Novak PK, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0144296 Penolazzi B, 2007, BIOL PSYCHOL, V74, P374, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.09.008 Rayner K, 1998, PSYCHOL BULL, V124, P372, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 RAYNER K, 1975, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V7, P65, DOI 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5 Rayner K, 2014, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V40, P1617, DOI 10.1037/a0036763 Rayner K, 2009, Q J EXP PSYCHOL, V62, P1457, DOI 10.1080/17470210902816461 Reich ED, 2012, PSYCHOL REV, V119, P155, DOI 10.1037/a0026473 Reichle ED, 1998, PSYCHOL REV, V105, P125, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125 Reingold EM., 2015, OXFORD HDB READING, P261, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199324576.013.10, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199324576.013.10] Riordan MA, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V76, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.009 Riordan MA, 2017, J LANG SOC PSYCHOL, V36, P549, DOI 10.1177/0261927X17704238 Schotter ER, 2016, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V42, P1839, DOI 10.1037/xlm0000281 Schotter ER, 2015, J MEM LANG, V83, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.005 Schotter ER, 2013, J MEM LANG, V69, P619, DOI 10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.002 Schotter ER, 2012, ATTEN PERCEPT PSYCHO, V74, P5, DOI 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2 Sereno SC, 2003, PSYCHOL SCI, V14, P328, DOI 10.1111/1467-9280.14471 Shaikh, 2020, 7 EUR C SOC MED 2020 Tang MM, 2020, NEUROSCI LETT, V722, DOI 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134815 Tigwell GW, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION WITH MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICES (MOBILEHCI 2016), P859, DOI 10.1145/2957265.2961844 Veldre A, 2017, PSYCHON B REV, V24, P519, DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1120-8 Veldre A, 2016, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V42, P939, DOI 10.1037/xhp0000200 Walther JB, 2001, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V19, P324, DOI 10.1177/089443930101900307 Weissman B, 2019, COMPANION OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE (WWW 2019 ), P478, DOI 10.1145/3308560.3316544 Weissman B, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0201727 Yan M, 2012, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V38, P1069, DOI 10.1037/a0026935 Yan M, 2009, PSYCHON B REV, V16, P561, DOI 10.3758/PBR.16.3.561 Yang JM, 2012, READ WRIT, V25, P1031, DOI 10.1007/s11145-010-9281-8 Yu LL, 2016, LANG COGN NEUROSCI, V31, P1130, DOI 10.1080/23273798.2016.1197954 NR 49 TC 11 Z9 11 PU SPRINGER PI NEW YORK PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES PD JUN PY 2021 VL 28 IS 3 BP 978 EP 991 DI 10.3758/s13423-020-01864-y EA JAN 2021 WC Psychology, Mathematical; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Anwyl-Irvine, AL Armstrong, T Dalmaijer, ES AF Anwyl-Irvine, Alexander L. Armstrong, Thomas Dalmaijer, Edwin S. TI MouseView.js: Reliable and valid attention tracking in web-based experiments using a cursor-directed aperture SO BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS LA English DT Article DE Attention; eye tracking; online experiments; JavaScript; open-source; cyberpsychology ID EYE TRACKING; VISUAL-ATTENTION; FIXATION; LIBRARY; LOOKING; MODEL; TOOL AB Psychological research is increasingly moving online, where web-based studies allow for data collection at scale. Behavioural researchers are well supported by existing tools for participant recruitment, and for building and running experiments with decent timing. However, not all techniques are portable to the Internet: While eye tracking works in tightly controlled lab conditions, webcam-based eye tracking suffers from high attrition and poorer quality due to basic limitations like webcam availability, poor image quality, and reflections on glasses and the cornea. Here we present MouseView.js, an alternative to eye tracking that can be employed in web-based research. Inspired by the visual system, MouseView.js blurs the display to mimic peripheral vision, but allows participants to move a sharp aperture that is roughly the size of the fovea. Like eye gaze, the aperture can be directed to fixate on stimuli of interest. We validated MouseView.js in an online replication (N = 165) of an established free viewing task (N = 83 existing eye-tracking datasets), and in an in-lab direct comparison with eye tracking in the same participants (N = 50). Mouseview.js proved as reliable as gaze, and produced the same pattern of dwell time results. In addition, dwell time differences from MouseView.js and from eye tracking correlated highly, and related to self-report measures in similar ways. The tool is open-source, implemented in JavaScript, and usable as a standalone library, or within Gorilla, jsPsych, and PsychoJS. In sum, MouseView.js is a freely available instrument for attention-tracking that is both reliable and valid, and that can replace eye tracking in certain web-based psychological experiments. C1 [Anwyl-Irvine, Alexander L.; Dalmaijer, Edwin S.] Univ Cambridge, MRC Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge, England. [Armstrong, Thomas] Whitman Coll, Dept Psychol, Walla Walla, WA 99362 USA. [Dalmaijer, Edwin S.] Univ Bristol, Sch Psychol Sci, Bristol, Avon, England. C3 RLUK- Research Libraries UK; University of Cambridge; Whitman College; RLUK- Research Libraries UK; University of Bristol RP Anwyl-Irvine, AL (corresponding author), Univ Cambridge, MRC Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge, England. EM alexander.irvine@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk FU Whitman College's Technology Experimentation Fund; Templeton World Charity Foundation [TWCF0159]; UK Medical Research Council [MC-A0606-5PQ41] FX This study was funded by Whitman College's Technology Experimentation Fund. ALAI and ESD are supported by the Templeton World Charity Foundation (grant TWCF0159) and the UK Medical Research Council (grant MC-A0606-5PQ41). CR Ang YS, 2018, CURR BIOL, V28, P1561, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.069 Anwyl-Irvine A, 2021, BEHAV RES METHODS, V53, P1407, DOI 10.3758/s13428-020-01501-5 Anwyl-Irvine AL, 2020, BEHAV RES METHODS, V52, P388, DOI 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x Armstrong T, 2022, EMOTION, V22, P1368, DOI 10.1037/emo0000919 Armstrong T, 2012, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V32, P704, DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.004 Bethlehem RAI, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0100171 Blackwell AF, 2000, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V1889, P162 Bradley MM, 2015, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V98, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.06.008 Bridges D, 2020, PEERJ, V8, DOI 10.7717/peerj.9414 Cristino F, 2010, BEHAV RES METHODS, V42, P692, DOI 10.3758/BRM.42.3.692 Dalmaijer ES, 2021, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V150, P1598, DOI 10.1037/xge0001006 Dalmaijer ES, 2014, BEHAV RES METHODS, V46, P913, DOI 10.3758/s13428-013-0422-2 de Leeuw JR, 2015, BEHAV RES METHODS, V47, P1, DOI 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y Gomez SR, 2017, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR, V23, P1042, DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2016.2532331 Gomez-Poveda J, 2016, EXPERT SYST APPL, V64, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.07.029 Gosselin F, 2001, VISION RES, V41, P2261, DOI 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00097-9 Hays J, 2015, P 33 ANN ACM C EXT A, P219 Hirsh-Pasek K., 1996, LANG SPEECH & COMMUN Holmqvist K., 2011, EYE TRACKING COMPREH Itti L, 1998, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V20, P1254, DOI 10.1109/34.730558 Jansen AR, 2003, BEHAV RES METH INS C, V35, P57, DOI 10.3758/BF03195497 Jia D, 2013, PROC CVPR IEEE, P580, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2013.81 JIANG M, 2015, PROC CVPR IEEE, P1072, DOI DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298710 KAZEMI V, 2014, PROC CVPR IEEE, P1867, DOI DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2014.241 Kim N., 2015, C HUMAN FACTORS COMP, DOI DOI 10.1145/2702613.2732934 Kim NW, 2017, ACM T COMPUT-HUM INT, V24, DOI 10.1145/3131275 Krafka K, 2016, PROC CVPR IEEE, P2176, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2016.239 Krajbich I, 2020, PSYARXIV, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/qhme6, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/QHME6] Krause F, 2014, BEHAV RES METHODS, V46, P416, DOI 10.3758/s13428-013-0390-6 KRUSKAL JB, 1964, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V29, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF02289565 Lingnau A, 2010, J VISION, V10, DOI 10.1167/10.11.13 Lingnau A, 2008, J VISION, V8, DOI 10.1167/8.5.6 Manohar SG, 2013, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00711 Mathot S, 2012, BEHAV RES METHODS, V44, P314, DOI 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7 MCCONKIE GW, 1975, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V17, P578, DOI 10.3758/BF03203972 McInnes Leland, 2020, Arxiv, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426 Meng CN, 2017, IEEE ACCESS, V5, P19581, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2754299 Mills M, 2015, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V41, P1300, DOI 10.1037/xhp0000076 Mogg K, 2000, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V109, P695, DOI 10.1037/0021-843X.109.4.695 Muhammed K, 2020, CORTEX, V122, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.12.001 Mulckhuyse M, 2016, COGN AFFECT BEHAV NE, V16, P315, DOI 10.3758/s13415-015-0391-2 Nord CL, 2021, CURR BIOL, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.087 Peirce J, 2019, BEHAV RES METHODS, V51, P195, DOI 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y Rayner K, 2014, VIS COGN, V22, P242, DOI 10.1080/13506285.2013.879084 REISFELD D, 1995, INT J COMPUT VISION, V14, P119, DOI 10.1007/BF01418978 Saragih JM, 2011, INT J COMPUT VISION, V91, P200, DOI 10.1007/s11263-010-0380-4 Semmelmann K, 2018, BEHAV RES METHODS, V50, P451, DOI 10.3758/s13428-017-0913-7 TELLER DY, 1979, INFANT BEHAV DEV, V2, P135, DOI 10.1016/S0163-6383(79)80016-8 Theeuwes J, 1998, PSYCHOL SCI, V9, P379, DOI 10.1111/1467-9280.00071 Van der Stigchel S, 2015, J VISION, V15, DOI 10.1167/15.15.17 Van der Stigchel S, 2006, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V30, P666, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.12.001 Wagenmakers EJ, 2007, PSYCHON B REV, V14, P779, DOI 10.3758/BF03194105 Xu Pingmei, 2015, ARXIV150406755 NR 53 TC 6 Z9 6 PU SPRINGER PI NEW YORK PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES PD AUG PY 2022 VL 54 IS 4 BP 1663 EP 1687 DI 10.3758/s13428-021-01703-5 EA SEP 2021 WC Psychology, Mathematical; Psychology, Experimental SC Psychology ER PT J AU Kochetkov, NV AF Kochetkov, Nikita V. TI Internet addiction and addiction to computer games in the work of Russian psychologists SO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIETY LA Russian DT Article DE Internet; cyberpsychology; Internet psychology; cyber socialization; Internet addiction; problem use of the Internet; computer addiction; addiction to computer games ID ONLINE; SOCIALIZATION; ADOLESCENTS; INFORMATION; BEHAVIOR; SPACE AB Objectives. This literary review is devoted to domestic research in the field of psychology of Internet addiction and addiction to computer games. Background. The popularity of topics related to Internet technologies is explained by their novelty, great dynamism and poorly studied, which causes social anxiety, catalyzing the activity of scientists in this area. In addition, one can note the high rate of spread of cyberdictions, due to which some authors are in a hurry to call them a threat to society. The structure of the study. The article provides data on the criteria, diagnostic techniques, causes, programs for the prevention and rehabilitation of Internet addiction and computer games, gives psychological characteristics of addicts, and traces the current trends in research into this problem area. Conclusions. According to the results of domestic empirical studies, Internet users, Internet addicts and gamers have negative psychological characteristics. The Internet has a destructive influence on the person, which is manifested in the simplification of speech, isolationism, and Internet users have difficulties in communication, a tendency to negativity, inadequate self-esteem, etc. Internet addicts will be characterized by deviations in the intellectual, motivational spheres, interpersonal relationships, coping strategies, value orientations, and planning. Users who are addicted to computer games will be distinguished by inconsistency with social norms, an overestimation of their capabilities, an unformed form of self, and unmotivated actions. Currently, the grounds for highlighting the criteria for cyberdictions are being rethought, more and more publications are turning to the positive impact of the Internet and computer games, noting their resource potential. C1 [Kochetkov, Nikita V.] Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Dept Social Psychol, Moscow, Russia. C3 Moscow State University of Psychology & Education RP Kochetkov, NV (corresponding author), Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Dept Social Psychol, Moscow, Russia. EM nkochetkov@mail.ru CR Aladyshkina A.S., 2006, THESIS Andreev I.V., 2008, THESIS Antonenko A.A., 2014, THESIS Antropova L.K., 2011, MEDITSINA OBRAZOVANI Asmolov A.G., 2004, MIR PSIKHOLOGII, P179 Asmolov GA, 2019, VOP PSIKHOL+, P3 [Аветисова А.А. Avetisova A.A.], 2011, [Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, Psychology. The Journal of the Higher School of Economics, Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki], V8, P35 Aysina RM, 2019, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V10, P42, DOI 10.17759/sps.2019100404 Baryshev R.A., 2009, THESIS Batenova YV, 2011, PSYCHOL-J HIGH SCH E, V8, P59 Belavina I. G., 1993, VOP PSIKHOL+, V3, P62 Belinskaya E.P, 2013, PSIKHOLOGIYA INTERNE Belovol EV, 2011, PSIKHOL ZH, V32, P49 Belozerov SA, 2015, PSYCHOL-J HIGH SCH E, V12, P71 Bogacheva N.V., 2018, KULTURA TEKHNOLOGII, V3, P76 Bogacheva N.V, 2015, THESIS Bogacheva NV, 2015, PSYCHOL-J HIGH SCH E, V12, P54 Butaev V.B., 2003, THESIS Danilova M.A., 2009, THESIS Demilkhanova A.M., 2009, THESIS Dmitriev K.G, 2013, THESIS Dobrovidova N.A., 2013, THESIS Drepa M.I., 2010, THESIS Egorov A., 2005, ISSUES MENTAL HLTH C, V5, P20 Egorov A.Yu, 2007, NEKHIMICHESKIE ZAVIS Egorov A.Yu, PERSPEKTIVY LECHENIY Evstigneeva Yu.M., 2003, THESIS, p[36, 20] Frolov V.A., 2010, THESIS Gainullina E.N., 2010, THESIS Gerasimova AA, 2018, Konsult Psikhol Psik, V26, P56, DOI 10.17759/cpp.2018260304 [Гришина Анна Викторовна Grishina A.V.], 2014, [Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14: Психология, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya], P131 Gritsenko A.A, 2015, FILOSOFIYA KHOZYAIST, V1, P77 Hasanova II, 2017, OBRAZOVANIE NAUKA, V19, P146, DOI 10.17853/1994-5639-2017-4-146-168 Kholmogorova AB, 2019, Konsult Psikhol Psik, V27, P138, DOI 10.17759/cpp.2019270309 Khomeriki N.S., 2013, THESIS Khudyakov A.V., 2015, MEDITSINSKAYA PSIKHO Kochetkov NV, 2016, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V7, P148, DOI 10.17759/sps.2016070311 Kolotilova I.V., 2009, THESIS Koval T. V., 2013, THESIS Kozulina N.S., 2016, SOVREMENNYE ISSLEDOV, P56, DOI [10.12731/2218-7405-2016-10-56-65, DOI 10.12731/2218-7405-2016-10-56-65] Krainyukov SV, 2019, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V10, P23, DOI 10.17759/sps.2019100403 Kryukova TL, 2019, Konsult Psikhol Psik, V27, P61, DOI 10.17759/cpp.2019270305 Kyshtymova IM, 2019, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V10, P160, DOI 10.17759/sps.2019100411 Loskutova V.A., 2004, THESIS Maksimov A.A., 2009, THESIS Malygin V.L., 2015, MEDITSINSKAYA PSIKHO Malygin V.L., 2011, MEDITSINSKAYA PSIKHO Mararitsa L.V., 2013, PETERBURGSKII PSIKHO, P1 Marinova TY, 2015, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V6, P109, DOI 10.17759/sps.2015060308 Marker C, 2018, EDUC PSYCHOL REV, V30, P651, DOI 10.1007/s10648-017-9430-6 Miroshnichenko A.V., 2010, THESIS Moiseeva T.B., 2008, THESIS Morozova OA, 2019, VOP PSIKHOL+, P84 Moskvin V.A., 2018, MIR NAUKI KULTURY OB, P347 Muratkina Yu.N., 2010, THESIS Obukhova L.F., 2008, PSIKHOLOGICHESKAYA N, P49 Omelchenko N.V., 2011, THESIS Oparina I.G., 2005, THESIS Polskaya NA, 2019, Konsult Psikhol Psik, V27, P156, DOI 10.17759/cpp.20192703010 Romanov I.V., 2005, THESIS Rubtsova OV, 2019, KULT-ISTOR PSIKHOL, V15, P117, DOI 10.17759/chp.2019150312 Rubtsova OV, 2018, Psikhol Nauk Obrazov, V23, P137, DOI 10.17759/pse.2018230112 Runet Detskii, 2018, OTR DOKL Ryaguzova T.V., 2001, THESIS Rybaltovich D.G., 2012, THESIS Rybnikov V.Yu., 2008, MEDIKO BIOL SOTSIALN, P72 Rykov Y, 2017, SOCIOL OBOZR, V16, P366, DOI 10.17323/1728-192X-2017-3-366-394 Saglam F.A., 2009, THESIS Samelyuk M.M., 2006, THESIS Samsonova N.N, 2018, THESIS [Савинская О.Б. Savinskaya O.B.], 2013, [Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, The monitoring of public opinion: economic & social changes, Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny], P123 Semenova O.Yu, 2012, THESIS Shaidulina A.F., 2004, THESIS Shmelev A.G., 1988, KOMPYUTERNYE IGRY OB, P16 Smirnova EO, 2018, Psikhol Nauk Obrazov, V23, P42, DOI 10.17759/pse.2018230304 Smirnova E.O., 2000, OBRAZOVANIE INFORMAT, P330 Sobkin VS, 2019, Konsult Psikhol Psik, V27, P119, DOI 10.17759/cpp.2019270308 Soldatova GU, 2019, Konsult Psikhol Psik, V27, P97, DOI 10.17759/cpp.2019270307 Soldatova GU, 2018, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V9, P71, DOI 10.17759/sps.2018090308 [Сорокина А.Б. Sorokina A.B.], 2015, [Современная зарубежная психология, Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya], V4, P45 Tatarko AN, 2019, SOC PSYCHOL SOC, V10, P77, DOI 10.17759/sps.2019100406 Tsoi N.A., 2011, THESIS Tuyakbasarova N.A., 2006, THESIS Ugolkov N.V., 2012, THESIS Van Sh, 2013, THESIS Vasileva I.A., 2003, VOP PSIKHOL+, P80 Voiskunskii A.E., 2018, TSIFROVOE OBSHCHESTV, P75 Voiskunskii A.E., 2015, MEDITSINSKAYA PSIKHO Voiskunskii A.E., 2019, TSIFROVOE OBSHCHESTV, P6 Voiskunskii A.E., 2010, PSIKHOLOGIYA INTERNE Voiskunsky A, 2013, PSYCHOL-J HIGH SCH E, V10, P98 Yureva L.N., 2006, KOMPYUTERNAYA ZAVISI Yurkov A.A., 2013, THESIS [Зарецкая О.В. Zaretskaya O.V.], 2017, [Психолого-педагогические исследования, Psychological-Educational Studies, Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya], V9, P145, DOI 10.17759/psyedu.2017090213 Zavalishina O.V, 2012, THESIS Zhichkina A.E., 2001, THESIS NR 96 TC 6 Z9 11 PU MOSCOW STATE UNIV PSYCHOLOGY & EDUCATION PI MOSCOW PA UL SRETENKA, 29, MOSCOW, 127051, RUSSIA PY 2020 VL 11 IS 1 BP 27 EP 54 DI 10.17759/sps.2020110103 WC Psychology, Applied SC Psychology ER PT J AU Belousov, LS Napalkov, DA Zhigulskaja, DD Pehsin, NL Velichkovsky, BM AF Belousov, L. S. Napalkov, D. A. Zhigulskaja, D. D. Pehsin, N. L. Velichkovsky, B. M. TI Cognitive research and new technologies in sport SO VOPROSY PSIKHOLOGII LA Russian DT Review DE sport; attention; emotions; resilience; eye-tracking; virtual reality; serious games; KINECT; biofeedback; neurobiofeedback; electroencephalography (EEG); shouting; individual approach ID EEG ALPHA OSCILLATIONS; QUIET EYE; GAZE BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; NEUROFEEDBACK; BIOFEEDBACK; TRACKING; EXPERTISE; INFORMATION; INTEGRATION AB In this overview article the authors consider practical perspectives and still unresolved problem on the way towards application in sport of three new technologies stemmed from contemporary psychological and neurophysiological research. The first of them is the technology of eye-tracking (i.e. registration of eye movements), which is increasingly used for controlling and correcting attention and visual perception in sportsmen and their trainers. The second technology consists in creating artificial -virtual- environments for training as well as for competitions in such emerging fields as cyberpsychology and e-Sport. Finally, the third technology is about to realize a neurobiocontrol of sportsmen's functional state on the base of methods for analysis of brain electrophysiological activity. As these three technologies are completely non-invasive they are all-around accepted alternatives to the use of chemical substances that may well improve human resilience and complex skill learning in sport but are prohibited by national and international antidoping laws. Still unresolved problems of their application are analyzed. Two such problems are, first, the necessity of interrupting the continuous activity in eye-tracking to recalibrate the measurement instruments and, second, an underestimation of spatial depth as well as insufficient supply of sensors and actuators for producing somatosensory and vestibular sensations in the virtual reality systems. In the field of neurobiocontrol, the paradox behavior of the EEG alpha rhythm in shouting is discussed: the rhythm is suppressed during aiming in beginners but is disinhibited in the sportsmen of highest qualification. The authors tentatively explain this phenomenon and argue for a strictly individual approach in using these high-tech instruments. C1 [Belousov, L. S.; Pehsin, N. L.] Russian Int Olymp Univ, Soci, Russia. [Belousov, L. S.; Napalkov, D. A.; Zhigulskaja, D. D.; Pehsin, N. L.; Velichkovsky, B. M.] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Moscow, Russia. [Zhigulskaja, D. D.] NeuroDrive Ltd, Moscow, Russia. [Velichkovsky, B. M.] Kurchatov Inst, Natl Res Ctr, Moscow, Russia. [Velichkovsky, B. M.] Russian State Univ Humanities, Moscow, Russia. [Velichkovsky, B. M.] Moscow Inst Phys & Technol, Dolgoprudnyi, Russia. C3 Lomonosov Moscow State University; National Research Centre - Kurchatov Institute; Russian State University for the Humanities; Moscow Institute of Physics & Technology RP Belousov, LS (corresponding author), Russian Int Olymp Univ, Soci, Russia.; Belousov, LS (corresponding author), Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Moscow, Russia. EM lbelousov@olympicuniversity.ru; napalkov@neurobiology.ru; zhigulskaya@neurobiology.ru; npeshin@olympicuniversity.ru; velichkovsky_bm@nrcki.ru CR Appelbaum LG, 2018, INT REV SPORT EXER P, V11, P160, DOI 10.1080/1750984X.2016.1266376 Arns M., 2008, J NEUROTHERAPY, V11, P11, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10874200802149656, 10.1080/10874200802149656] Austen K, 2015, NATURE, V525, P22, DOI 10.1038/525022a Bazanova O. M., 2004, B SO RAMN, P114 Beauchamp MK, 2012, J CLIN SPORT PSYCHOL, V6, P67, DOI 10.1123/jcsp.6.1.67 Blumenstein B., 2014, BIOFEEDBACK SPORT PE, DOI [10.1093/oxford-hb/9780199935291.013.001, DOI 10.1093/OXFORD-HB/9780199935291.013.001] Blumenstein B., 2012, PSYCHOL SKILLS SPORT Boya M, 2017, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V49, P1884, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001304 BRIDGEMAN B, 1994, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V17, P247, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00034361 Caplan JB, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P4726 Cheng MY, 2015, J SPORT EXERCISE PSY, V37, P626, DOI 10.1123/jsep.2015-0166 Chia J. S., 2017, FRONT PSYCHOL Csikszentmihalyi M., 1990, POTOK PSIXOLOGIYA OP Cuperus AA, 2016, LEARN MOTIV, V56, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.lmot.2016.09.005 Decroix M, 2017, HUM MOVEMENT SCI, V55, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.humov.2017.08.012 Dilking P., 2018, FRONT PHYSIOL Duking P., 2018, SENSORS, V18, P1 Dzhafarova O. A., 2000, IZVESTIYA YUZHNOGO F, V18, P12 Faridnia M., 2012, Annals of Biological Research, V3, P1020 Fegatelli D, 2016, SMART INNOV SYST TEC, V55, P715, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39345-2_64 Gerig N, 2018, ADV INTELL SYST, V663, P113, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-67846-7_12 Granasen D, 2019, COGN TECHNOL WORK, V21, P253, DOI 10.1007/s10111-018-0499-6 Gruzelier JH, 2014, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V93, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.004 Gruzelier JH, 2014, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V44, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.11.004 Harkness T., 2008, A BINDRA WINS INDIAS Harkness T., 2009, BIOFEEDBACK, V37, P48, DOI [10.5298/1081-5937-37.2.48, DOI 10.5298/1081-5937-37.2.48] Harris DJ, 2017, COGN PROCESS, V18, P343, DOI 10.1007/s10339-017-0794-9 HATFIELD BD, 1984, J SPORT PSYCHOL, V6, P42, DOI 10.1123/jsp.6.1.42 Hatfield BD, 2004, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V21, P144, DOI 10.1097/00004691-200405000-00003 Hatfield D. B., 1982, AM MARKSMAN, P6 Haufler AJ, 2000, BIOL PSYCHOL, V53, P131, DOI 10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00047-8 Hoffmann CP, 2014, J SPORT SCI, V32, P501, DOI 10.1080/02640414.2013.835435 Hudson Irwin, 2016, Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. 8th International Conference, VAMR 2016, held as part of HCI International 2016. Proceedings: LNCS 9740, P14, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39907-2_2 Hulsmann F, 2016, ADV INTELL SYST, V392, P211, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24560-7_27 Hurley O. A., 2018, SPORT CYBERPSYCHOLOG Iljukov S., 2017, FRONT PHYSIOL Jensen O, 2010, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V4, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00186 Kao SC, 2014, J APPL SPORT PSYCHOL, V26, P271, DOI 10.1080/10413200.2013.855682 Kaplan A. Ya., 2016, VESTN ROSS GOS MED U, P26 Kellar D, 2018, NEUROIMAGE-CLIN, V18, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.025 Kerick SE, 2004, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V36, P118, DOI 10.1249/01.MSS.0000106176.31784.D4 Kerick SE, 2001, BIOL PSYCHOL, V58, P263, DOI 10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00116-8 Kiefer AW, 2018, J SCI MED SPORT, V21, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.06.016 Klimesch W, 2007, BRAIN RES REV, V53, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.003 Klostermann A, 2017, RES Q EXERCISE SPORT, V88, P101, DOI 10.1080/02701367.2016.1229864 Knyazev GG, 2011, BRAIN RES, V1402, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.052 Konovalova I. E., 2018, SINTEZ NAUKI OBSHHES, P209 Kredel R, 2017, FRONT PSYCHOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01845 Kvitchastyj A. V., 2013, SPORTIVNYJ PSIXOLOG, V28, P46 Lames M., 2017, P 11 INT S COMP SCI LANDERS DM, 1991, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V23, P123 Mallek M, 2017, EUR J SPORT SCI, V17, P1270, DOI 10.1080/17461391.2017.1375014 Marques R., 2018, J PHYS ED SPORT, V18, P175 Miah A, 2017, SPORT 2 0 TRANSFORMI Mikicin M, 2015, BIOMED HUM KINET, V7, P58, DOI 10.1515/bhk-2015-0010 Miles CAL, 2017, EUR J SPORT SCI, V17, P100, DOI 10.1080/17461391.2015.1122093 Mirifar A, 2017, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V75, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.005 Napalkov DA, 2006, PERCEPTION, V35, P189 Napalkov DA, 2013, BYULLETEN SIB MED, V12, P219 Napalkov D. A., 2009, APPARATNY METODY DIA Neumann DL, 2018, SPORTS, V6, DOI 10.3390/sports6030071 Neumann DL, 2018, VIRTUAL REAL-LONDON, V22, P183, DOI 10.1007/s10055-017-0320-5 Nickerson R., 1992, LOOKING AHEAD HUMAN Panchuk D, 2017, EUR J SPORT SCI, V17, P93, DOI 10.1080/17461391.2016.1156160 Passos P., 2017, FRONT PSYCHOL Pataky TC, 2018, J SPORT SCI, V36, P1355, DOI 10.1080/02640414.2017.1378493 Paul M., 2011, IBNOSINA J MED BIOME, V4, P32 Pereira M, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00527 Pizzera A, 2018, RES Q EXERCISE SPORT, V89, P112, DOI 10.1080/02701367.2017.1412392 Power P, 2017, KDD'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, P1605, DOI 10.1145/3097983.3098051 Railsback D., 2018, ADV INTELLIGENT SYST, P325 Raymond J, 2005, APPL PSYCHOPHYS BIOF, V30, P65, DOI 10.1007/s10484-005-2175-x Renner RS, 2013, ACM COMPUT SURV, V46, DOI 10.1145/2543581.2543590 Ring C, 2015, PSYCHOL SPORT EXERC, V16, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.005 Robertson PJ, 2018, INT J SPORTS SCI COA, V13, P186, DOI 10.1177/1747954117737275 Rostami R., 2012, J NEUROTHERAPY, V16, P264, DOI [10.1080/10874208.2012.730388, DOI 10.1080/10874208.2012.730388] Rusciano A, 2017, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V54, P916, DOI 10.1111/psyp.12847 SALAZAR W, 1990, RES Q EXERCISE SPORT, V61, P351, DOI 10.1080/02701367.1990.10607499 Shaw JC, 1996, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V24, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8760(96)00052-9 Shaw L, 2012, J CLIN SPORT PSYCHOL, V6, P47, DOI 10.1123/jcsp.6.1.47 Smith ME, 1999, COGNITIVE BRAIN RES, V7, P389, DOI 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00043-3 Smith ME, 2001, HUM FACTORS, V43, P366, DOI 10.1518/001872001775898287 Taliep MS, 2014, PERCEPTION, V43, P316, DOI 10.1068/p7530 Trofimova A. K., 2018, VOPROSY PSIXOLOGII, V2, P111 van Leeuwen PM, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0186871 Velichkovsky B. M., 1996, Human Factors in Computing Systems. Common Ground. CHI 96 Conference Proceedings, P496, DOI 10.1145/238386.238619 Velichkovsky B. M., 2010, VESTNIK ROSSIJSKOJ A, V5-6, P440 Velichkovsky B. M., 2006, KOGNITIVNAYA NAUKA O, V2 Velichkovsky BM., 2005, P 27 C COGN SCI SOC, P2283 VELICHKOVSKY BM, 2016, VOPROSY PSIXOLOGII, P79 Velichkovsky BB, 2017, PSYCHOL RUSS, V10, P165, DOI 10.11621/pir.2017.0311 Velichkovsky BB, 2014, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V39, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2014.11.012 Velichkovsky BM, 2018, CONSCIOUS COGN, V64, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2018.06.004 Velichkovsky BM, 2012, SCI PSYCH S, P281 Vignais N, 2015, HUM MOVEMENT SCI, V39, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.humov.2014.10.006 Vogel U, 2009, J SOC INF DISPLAY, V17, P175, DOI 10.1889/JSID17.3.175 Wilson V. E., 2006, BIOFEEDBACK, V3, P79 Zhang L, 2018, COMPUT GRAPH-UK, V72, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.cag.2018.01.008 NR 98 TC 1 Z9 1 PU MEZHDUNARODNAYA KNIGA PI MOSCOW PA 39 DIMITROVA UL., MOSCOW, 113095, RUSSIA PD SEP-OCT PY 2018 IS 5 BP 117 EP + WC Psychology, Educational SC Psychology ER PT J AU Klimczyk, P AF Klimczyk, Piotr TI What Is the Post-Game Depression? A Narrative Inquiry SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL RESEARCH ON CYBERSPACE LA English DT Article DE post -game depression; player -avatar relationships; parasocial; relationships; narrative inquiry; qualitative methods ID VIDEO GAMES; AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY; AVATAR IDENTIFICATION; ADDICTION; EXPERIENCE; IDENTITY; MECHANICS; CHARACTER; STORIES; SENSE AB Despite the fact that video games and gaming are one of the main focuses of scholars in the field of cyberpsychology, there are a lot of phenomena that hardly get any scientific cover. One of them is post-game depression, a term coined in the gamers community to express a specific state that some of them experience after playing certain video games. However, as to the authors' knowledge, there has been no research focusing on understanding that state. Based on the findings of narrative psychology, a narrative inquiry approach was chosen for the presented qualitative, exploratory study. Using guidelines from the interpretative phenomenological analysis, the final sample of 35 given narratives of players were analysed, of which 22 described post-game depression and 13 of narrators described reasons why they did not experience it. After comparing the results between the two groups, the general conclusion is that post-game depression is a state of media anhedonia and reminiscing about the game that gave a visceral, insightful, thought-provoking and emotionally driven experience where players had parasocial relationships with in-game characters and/or their avatars/protagonists. Possible buffer factors can be personal growth from the experience and a fulfilling ending for the player. It is important to further understand what other factors, for example, personal traits of the players and specific game mechanics, contribute to that state since it can be a possible cause of serious psychological distress on the one hand, on the other a possible phase of being personally enriched by the experience of playing certain video games. C1 [Klimczyk, Piotr] Stefan Batory Acad Appl Sci, Inst Social Sci, Socioecon Coll, Skierniewice, Poland. [Klimczyk, Piotr] Inst Social Sci, Wadysawa Orkana 8-47 St, PL-96100 Skierniewice, Poland. RP Klimczyk, P (corresponding author), Inst Social Sci, Wadysawa Orkana 8-47 St, PL-96100 Skierniewice, Poland. EM pklimczyk@ansb.pl CR A WOOD R. T., 2008, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V6, P169, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11469-007-9118-0 Adachi PJC, 2017, CHILD DEV PERSPECT, V11, P202, DOI 10.1111/cdep.12232 Adler JM, 2017, SOC PSYCHOL PERS SCI, V8, P519, DOI 10.1177/1948550617698202 Ahn C, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666518 American Psychiatric Association, 2022, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, V5th ed Ancis J. R., 2020, TECHNOLOGY MIND BEHA, V1, DOI [10.1037/tmb0000009, DOI 10.1037/TMB0000009] Arbeau K., 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV REP, V2, DOI [10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100013, DOI 10.1016/J.CHBR.2020.100013] Banks Jaime, 2015, First Monday, V20, DOI 10.5210/fm.v20i2.5433 Banks J, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701965 BAUMEISTER RF, 1994, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V20, P676, DOI 10.1177/0146167294206006 Bean AM, 2017, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V48, P378, DOI 10.1037/pro0000150 Bessiere K, 2007, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V10, P530, DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.9994 Billieux J, 2019, CURR ADDICT REP, V6, P323, DOI 10.1007/s40429-019-00259-x Bluck S, 2000, MOTIV EMOTION, V24, P121, DOI 10.1023/A:1005615331901 Bopp J. A., 2015, P 33 ANN ACM C HUM F, P1193, DOI [10.1145/2702613.2732852, DOI 10.1145/2702613.2732852] Bopp JA, 2019, CHI PLAY'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION IN PLAY, P313, DOI 10.1145/3311350.3347169 Bopp JA, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), DOI 10.1145/3173574.3173615 Bopp JA, 2016, 34TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, CHI 2016, P2996, DOI 10.1145/2858036.2858227 Bowman ND, 2023, PSYCHOL POP MEDIA, V12, P147, DOI 10.1037/ppm0000382 Bowman ND, 2016, J GAMING VIRTUAL WOR, V8, P83, DOI 10.1386/jgvw.8.1.83_1 Bowman SL, 2018, ROLE-PLAYING GAME STUDIES: TRANSMEDIA FOUNDATIONS, P245 Boyle EA, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P771, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.020 Braun V, 2021, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V24, P641, DOI 10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550 Brunborg GS, 2014, J BEHAV ADDICT, V3, P27, DOI 10.1556/JBA.3.2014.002 BRUNER J, 1991, CRIT INQUIRY, V18, P1, DOI 10.1086/448619 Bruner J., 1986, ACTUAL MINDS POSSIBL Butt MAR, 2019, GAMES CULT, V14, P430, DOI 10.1177/1555412017744695 Christy KR, 2016, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V19, P283, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2015.0474 Daneels R, 2021, MEDIA COMMUN-LISBON, V9, P178, DOI 10.17645/mac.v9i2.3824 Daneels R, 2021, MEDIA COMMUN-LISBON, V9, P49, DOI 10.17645/mac.v9i1.3205 de Mul J., 2015, REPRESENTATIONS INTE Dechering A., 2018, P 13 INT C FDN DIG G, DOI [10.1145/3235765.3235779, DOI 10.1145/3235765.3235779] Denisova A, 2021, CHI '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, DOI 10.1145/3411764.3445286 Downs E, 2019, PSYCHOL POP MEDIA CU, V8, P269, DOI 10.1037/ppm0000170 Dudai Y, 2016, MEM STUD, V9, P275, DOI 10.1177/1750698016645234 Elson M, 2014, J COMMUN, V64, P521, DOI 10.1111/jcom.12096 Ferchaud A, 2019, J GAMING VIRTUAL WOR, V11, P101, DOI 10.1386/jgvw.11.2.101_1 Ferguson CJ, 2010, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V14, P68, DOI 10.1037/a0018941 Fivush R., 2019, QUAL PSYCHOL, V6, P156, DOI [10.1037/qup0000150, DOI 10.1037/QUP0000150] Fivush R, 2011, INT J PSYCHOL, V46, P321, DOI 10.1080/00207594.2011.596541 Frischlich L, 2021, NEW MEDIA SOC, V23, P554, DOI 10.1177/1461444819899625 Guegan J, 2020, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, V14, DOI 10.5817/CP2020-4-1 Hefner D, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4740, P39 Heineman David S., 2014, J GAMES CRITICISM, V1, P1 Hellman M, 2013, ADDICT RES THEORY, V21, P102, DOI 10.3109/16066359.2012.693222 Howe W. T., 2021, COMPUT HUM BEHAV REP, V3, DOI [10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100063, DOI 10.1016/J.CHBR.2021.100063] Jennett C, 2008, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V66, P641, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004 Ji Jianlin, 2012, Shanghai Arch Psychiatry, V24, P288, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2012.05.007 Kaczmarek LD, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V75, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.031 Kim K, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V48, P695, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.011 King DL, 2011, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V9, P320, DOI 10.1007/s11469-010-9289-y Klimczyk P., 2021, POLSKIE FORUM PSYCHO, V26, P191, DOI [10.34767/PFP.2021.02.05, DOI 10.34767/PFP.2021.02.05] Koenitz H., 2018, DIGRA 18 P 2018 DIGR Kottasz R, 2019, ARTS MARK, V9, P132, DOI 10.1108/AAM-02-2019-0009 Kowal M, 2021, JMIR SERIOUS GAMES, V9, DOI 10.2196/26575 Martinez K, 2021, JMIR SERIOUS GAMES, V9, DOI 10.2196/30482 McAdams D. P., 2001, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V5, P100, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.100, 10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.100] McAdams DP, 2015, PSYCHOL SCI, V26, P475, DOI 10.1177/0956797614568318 McAdams DP, 2013, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V22, P233, DOI 10.1177/0963721413475622 MCADAMS DP, 1995, J PERS, V63, P365, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00500.x Mekler ED, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION IN PLAY (CHI PLAY 2018), P315, DOI 10.1145/3242671.3242691 Mekler ED, 2014, 32ND ANNUAL ACM CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2014), P927, DOI 10.1145/2556288.2557078 Minor S., 2021, GAMER 0530 Murray M., 2007, QUALITATIVE PSYCHOL, P111 Nelson KD, 2004, PSYCHOL REV, V111, P486, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.486 Ninaus M, 2021, FRONT EDUC, V5, DOI 10.3389/feduc.2020.611072 Ogonowska A., 2018, ANN UNIVERSITATIS PA, V10, P5, DOI [10.24917/20837275.10.4.1, DOI 10.24917/20837275.10.4.1] Ostenson J., 2013, ENGL J, V102, P71 Ostinelli EG, 2021, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V284, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.014 Pallavicini F, 2021, JMIR MENT HEALTH, V8, DOI 10.2196/28150 Parker G, 2015, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V131, P401, DOI 10.1111/acps.12385 Pennebaker JW, 2003, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V54, P547, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041 Petko D, 2015, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, V9, DOI 10.5817/CP2015-2-5 Pietkiewicz I., 2014, CZASOPISMO PSYCHOL, V20, P7, DOI [10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7, DOI 10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7] Pine R, 2020, GAMES HEALTH J, V9, P255, DOI 10.1089/g4h.2019.0132 Poppelaars M, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575962 Raith L, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.698799 Rime Bernard, 1998, EUROPEAN REV SOCIAL, V9, P145, DOI DOI 10.1080/14792779843000072 Ritterfeld U, 2006, LEA COMMUN SER, P399 Robinson JA, 2022, GAMES CULT, V17, P421, DOI 10.1177/15554120211034759 Rokosny I., 2018, ACTA LUDOLOGICA, V1, P48 Russoniello CV, 2019, GAMES HEALTH J, V8, P332, DOI 10.1089/g4h.2019.0032 Russoniello CV, 2013, GAMES HEALTH J, V2, P341, DOI 10.1089/g4h.2013.0010 Singer JA, 2013, J PERS, V81, P569, DOI 10.1111/jopy.12005 Squire C., 2008, DOING NARRATIVE RES, P1, DOI DOI 10.4135/9780857024992.D2 Stavropoulos V, 2022, ASIA-PAC PSYCHIAT, V14, DOI 10.1111/appy.12474 Stone CB, 2022, MEMORY, V30, P450, DOI 10.1080/09658211.2022.2040534 Thon J. -S., 2009, PROCEEDING PHILOS CO, P1 Tortolero SR, 2014, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V17, P609, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2014.0091 Valadez JJ, 2012, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V28, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.006 Weinstein AM, 2010, AM J DRUG ALCOHOL AB, V36, P268, DOI 10.3109/00952990.2010.491879 Wilkinson P, 2016, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V9970, P17, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46152-6_2 Wulf T, 2018, MEDIA COMMUN-LISBON, V6, P60, DOI 10.17645/mac.v6i2.1317 NR 93 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MASARYKOVA UNIV, FAC SOCIAL STUDIES PI BRNO PA JOSTOVA 10, BRNO, 602 00, CZECH REPUBLIC PY 2022 VL 17 IS 2 AR 5 DI 10.5817/CP2023-2-5 WC Communication; Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Communication; Psychology ER PT J AU Lowe-Calverley, E Pontes, HM AF Lowe-Calverley, Emily Pontes, Halley M. TI Challenging the Concept of Smartphone Addiction: An Empirical Pilot Study of Smartphone Usage Patterns and Psychological Well-Being SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Article DE smartphone use; smartphone addiction; psychological well-being; technology; communication; cyberpsychology ID STRESS AB Smartphone use is ubiquitous, however, scholarly debate regarding the addictive nature of smartphones abounds. In this context, it is integral to distinguish between the content that users experience and the medium that facilitates access to the former, as users may experience addictive-like responses to the specific activities they engage in through the context experienced rather than the device that facilitates access to these activities. The present study aimed to explore conceptualizations of smartphone addiction by (a) investigating user preferences for specific smartphone functionalities, (b) examining behavioral changes associated with limited access to preferred functionalities, and (c) exploring links between aspects of smartphone use and self-reported psychological well-being. A total of 471 participants completed an online survey, providing data on sociodemographics, actual and hypothetical smartphone usage, and psychological well-being (depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms). The results showed that communication functionalities were most frequently cited as being preferred among smartphone users. Notably, participants reported that they would check their smartphones significantly fewer times if their top-three functionalities were inaccessible. This suggests that smartphone users are likely to become addicted to the functionalities they access on their smartphones (content) and not the smartphones themselves (medium), rendering unviable the notion of smartphone addiction as a construct. Further analyses suggested negligible to small correlations between aspects of smartphone use and psychological well-being variables. The findings imply that rather than focusing on frequency of smartphone use, it is recommended that future research examines the type and quality of specific smartphone usages and their effects on user well-being. C1 [Lowe-Calverley, Emily; Pontes, Halley M.] Univ Tasmania, Sch Psychol Sci, Newnham Campus,Bldg O, Hobart, Tas 7250, Australia. [Lowe-Calverley, Emily; Pontes, Halley M.] Univ Tasmania, Int Cyberpsychol & Addict Res Lab iCARL, Hobart, Tas, Australia. C3 University of Tasmania; University of Tasmania RP Pontes, HM (corresponding author), Univ Tasmania, Sch Psychol Sci, Newnham Campus,Bldg O, Hobart, Tas 7250, Australia. EM contactme@halleypontes.com CR Billieux J., 2015, CURR ADDICT REP, V2, P156, DOI DOI 10.1007/S40429-015-0054-Y Billieux J, 2015, J BEHAV ADDICT, V4, P119, DOI 10.1556/2006.4.2015.009 Chen CY, 2017, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V37, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.04.009 Deloitte, 2020, GLOB MOB CONS SURV 2 Deloitte, 2020, GLOB MOB CONS SURV Dey M, 2019, J BEHAV ADDICT, V8, P326, DOI 10.1556/2006.8.2019.17 Ellis DA, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P508, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.29152.lte Griffiths MD, 2014, J BEHAV ADDICT, V3, P74, DOI 10.1556/JBA.2.2013.016 Griffiths MD., 1999, STUDENT BRIT MED J, V7, P428 Karsay K, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P706, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0255 Kim MG, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.010 Kuss DJ, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14030311 Lemola S, 2015, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V44, P405, DOI 10.1007/s10964-014-0176-x Lopez-Fernandez O, 2017, J BEHAV ADDICT, V6, P168, DOI 10.1556/2006.6.2017.020 LOVIBOND PF, 1995, BEHAV RES THER, V33, P335, DOI 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U Montag C, 2020, J BEHAV ADDICT, V9, P908, DOI 10.1556/2006.8.2019.59 Nicol A, 2010, J SCH VIOLENCE, V9, P212, DOI DOI 10.1080/15388220903585861 Panova T, 2020, BEHAV INFORM TECHNOL, V39, P944, DOI 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1633405 Panova T, 2018, J BEHAV ADDICT, V7, P252, DOI 10.1556/2006.7.2018.49 Peterka-Bonetta J, 2019, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00127 Pontes Halley M, 2015, Addict Behav Rep, V1, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.03.002 Rozgonjuk D, 2019, STUD NEUROSCI, P185, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-31620-4_11 Shaw H, 2016, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V19, P727, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2016.0324 Tateno M, 2019, PSYCHIAT INVEST, V16, P115, DOI 10.30773/pi.2018.12.25.2 Vally S, 2019, ANN INTENSIVE CARE, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0503-1 Wang PC, 2019, CHILD YOUTH SERV REV, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104384 White MP, 2004, RISK ANAL, V24, P323, DOI 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00434.x Wiederhold BK, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P235, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2019.29146.bkw NR 28 TC 20 Z9 20 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD AUG 1 PY 2020 VL 23 IS 8 BP 550 EP 556 DI 10.1089/cyber.2019.0719 EA JUN 2020 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Riches, S Azevedo, L Vora, A Kaleva, I Taylor, L Guan, PP Jeyarajaguru, P McIntosh, H Petrou, C Pisani, S Hammond, N AF Riches, Simon Azevedo, Lisa Vora, Alkesh Kaleva, Ina Taylor, Lawson Guan, Peipei Jeyarajaguru, Priyanga McIntosh, Harley Petrou, Constantina Pisani, Sara Hammond, Neil TI Therapeutic engagement in robot-assisted psychological interventions: A systematic review SO CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY LA English DT Review DE autism; cyberpsychology; dementia; digital; psychotherapy; robotics ID AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER; LONG-TERM; SOCIAL ROBOT; CHILDREN; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; INDIVIDUALS; RESISTANCE; SYMPTOMS; BEHAVIOR AB Purpose Therapeutic engagement is a key component of psychological interventions. Robot-assisted psychological interventions appear to have therapeutic benefits for service users that are challenging to engage. However, engagement with robots in robot-assisted psychological interventions is not well understood. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the quality of therapeutic engagement in robot-assisted psychological interventions (PROSPERO: 122437). Methods Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo and Medline were searched until 15 January 2021 for studies which quantitatively evaluated therapeutic engagement in robot-assisted psychological interventions. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool was used to assess methodological dimensions of studies. Results 3647 studies were identified through database searching. Thirty studies (N = 1462), published between 2004 and 2020, and from 14 countries, were included. Robots were typically toy animals or humanoids and were used to provide support and improve wellbeing through social interaction. Studies primarily tested robots on older adults with dementia and children with autism and indicated positive therapeutic engagement. Twelve studies included a control group. EPHPP ratings were 'strong' (N = 1), 'moderate' (N = 10) and 'weak' (N = 19). Conclusions Therapeutic engagement between service users and robots is generally positive. Methodological limitations of studies, such as small sample sizes, and lack of control groups and longitudinal data, mean that the field is in early stages of its development and conclusions should be drawn with caution. There are important practical and ethical implications for policymakers to consider, such as responsible clinical practice and how service users may understand the therapeutic relationship with robots. C1 [Riches, Simon] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol Neurosci, Dept Psychol, London SE5 8AF, England. [Riches, Simon] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Social Genet Dev Psychiat Ctr, London, England. [Riches, Simon; Azevedo, Lisa; Hammond, Neil] South London & Maudsley, NHS Fdn Trust, London, England. [Vora, Alkesh; Kaleva, Ina; Taylor, Lawson; Guan, Peipei; Jeyarajaguru, Priyanga; McIntosh, Harley; Petrou, Constantina; Pisani, Sara] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol Neurosci, Dept Psychosis Studies, London, England. C3 University of London; King's College London; University of London; King's College London; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; University of London; King's College London RP Riches, S (corresponding author), Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol Neurosci, Dept Psychol, London SE5 8AF, England. EM simon.j.riches@kcl.ac.uk CR Armijo-Olivo S, 2012, J EVAL CLIN PRACT, V18, P12, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x Banks MR, 2002, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V57, pM428, DOI 10.1093/gerona/57.7.M428 Barber O, 2021, INT J SOC ROBOT, V13, P1411, DOI 10.1007/s12369-020-00722-0 Bharatharaj J, 2017, INT J ADV ROBOT SYST, V14, DOI 10.1177/1729881417736895 Bharatharaj J, 2017, ROBOTICS, V6, DOI 10.3390/robotics6010004 Boccanfuso L, 2017, AUTON ROBOT, V41, P637, DOI 10.1007/s10514-016-9554-4 Broekens Joost, 2009, Gerontechnology, V8, P94, DOI 10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00 Capri T, 2021, REV J AUTISM DEV DIS, V8, P244, DOI 10.1007/s40489-020-00214-x Causo A, 2016, MECH MACH SCI, V37, P75, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22368-1_8 Chu MT, 2017, ASSIST TECHNOL, V29, P8, DOI 10.1080/10400435.2016.1171807 Coeckelbergh M, 2016, SCI ENG ETHICS, V22, P47, DOI 10.1007/s11948-015-9649-x Costa S, 2015, INT J SOC ROBOT, V7, P265, DOI 10.1007/s12369-014-0250-2 Costescu CA, 2015, J AUTISM DEV DISORD, V45, P3715, DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2319-z Costescu CA, 2014, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V18, P127, DOI 10.1037/gpr0000007 David D, 2014, INT J COGN THER, V7, P192, DOI 10.1521/ijct.2014.7.2.192 Dawson G, 2004, DEV PSYCHOL, V40, P271, DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.271 Dixon LB, 2016, WORLD PSYCHIATRY, V15, P13, DOI 10.1002/wps.20306 Fiske A, 2019, J MED INTERNET RES, V21, DOI 10.2196/13216 Francois D, 2009, INTERACT STUD, V10, P324, DOI 10.1075/is.10.3.04fra Holdsworth E, 2014, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V34, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.004 Hsu TJ, 2017, GERIATR GERONTOL INT, V17, P28, DOI 10.1111/ggi.13037 Huskens B, 2013, DEV NEUROREHABIL, V16, P345, DOI 10.3109/17518423.2012.739212 Jones C, 2018, J AM MED DIR ASSOC, V19, P623, DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.02.014 Joranson N, 2016, INT PSYCHOGERIATR, V28, P1345, DOI 10.1017/S1041610216000120 Kahn PH, 2006, INTERACT STUD, V7, P405, DOI 10.1075/is.7.3.13kah Kato S., 2005, KANSEI ENG INT, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.5057/KEI.5.3_35 Khosla R., 2013, ACM T MANAGE INF SYS, V4, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1145/2544104, 10.1145/2544104] Kim ES, 2012, J HUM-ROBOT INTERACT, V1, P26, DOI 10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Kim Kim ES, 2013, J AUTISM DEV DISORD, V43, P1038, DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1645-2 Kozima H, 2009, INT J SOC ROBOT, V1, P3, DOI 10.1007/s12369-008-0009-8 Lane GW, 2016, PSYCHOL SERV, V13, P292, DOI 10.1037/ser0000080 Lawson A, 2015, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V176, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.017 Lee J, 2012, INT J ADV ROBOT SYST, V9, DOI 10.5772/51128 Libin Alexander, 2004, Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen, V19, P111, DOI 10.1177/153331750401900209 Libin AV, 2004, P IEEE, V92, P1789, DOI 10.1109/JPROC.2004.835366 Loi SM, 2018, INT PSYCHOGERIATR, V30, P1075, DOI 10.1017/S1041610217002617 Luxton DD, 2014, ARTIF INTELL MED, V62, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.artmed.2014.06.004 Marino F, 2020, J AUTISM DEV DISORD, V50, P1973, DOI 10.1007/s10803-019-03953-x Moerman CJ, 2021, J CHILD HEALTH CARE, V25, P412, DOI 10.1177/1367493520947503 Mohr DC, 2018, JAMA PSYCHIAT, V75, P113, DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3838 Moyle W, 2017, J AM MED DIR ASSOC, V18, P766, DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.03.018 Newman CF, 2002, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V58, P165, DOI 10.1002/jclp.1140 O'Brien A, 2009, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V44, P558, DOI 10.1007/s00127-008-0476-0 Oetzel KB, 2003, PSYCHOTHERAPY, V40, P215, DOI 10.1037/0033-3204.40.3.215 Pennisi P, 2016, AUTISM RES, V9, P165, DOI 10.1002/aur.1527 Pivetti M, 2020, HELIYON, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05160 Pu LH, 2019, GERONTOLOGIST, V59, pE37, DOI 10.1093/geront/gny046 Rabbitt SM, 2015, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V35, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.001 Ramsetty A, 2020, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, V27, P1147, DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocaa078 Riek LD, 2016, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN BEHAVIORAL AND MENTAL HEALTH CARE, P185, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-420248-1.00008-8 Robinson H, 2013, J AM MED DIR ASSOC, V14, P661, DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007 Robotham Dan, 2016, J Med Internet Res, V18, pe309 Rouaix N, 2017, FRONT PSYCHOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00950 Rudovic O, 2017, FRONT ROBOT AI, V4, P1, DOI 10.3389/frobt.2017.00036 Scassellati B, 2012, ANNU REV BIOMED ENG, V14, P275, DOI 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150036 Scoglio AAJ, 2019, J MED INTERNET RES, V21, DOI 10.2196/13322 Scott KL, 2007, TRAUMA VIOLENCE ABUS, V8, P401, DOI 10.1177/1524838007307593 Shamsuddin S, 2012, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V41, P1448, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.334 Sharkey A, 2012, ETHICS INF TECHNOL, V14, P27, DOI 10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6 Shibata T, 1999, ICRA '99: IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, P2868, DOI 10.1109/ROBOT.1999.774032 So WC, 2019, RES DEV DISABIL, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103515 So WC, 2020, J AUTISM DEV DISORD, V50, P467, DOI 10.1007/s10803-019-04270-z Stahl BC, 2016, ROBOT AUTON SYST, V86, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.018 Sung HC, 2015, ASIA-PAC PSYCHIAT, V7, P1, DOI 10.1111/appy.12131 Thodberg K, 2016, PSYCHOGERIATRICS, V16, P289, DOI 10.1111/psyg.12159 Thodberg K, 2016, ANTHROZOOS, V29, P107, DOI 10.1080/08927936.2015.1089011 Wainer J., 2010, 2010 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2010), P631, DOI 10.1109/ICHR.2010.5686346 Westerman MA, 2005, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V9, P16, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.9.1.16 Williams JHG, 2004, J AUTISM DEV DISORD, V34, P285, DOI 10.1023/B:JADD.0000029551.56735.3a NR 69 TC 4 Z9 4 PU WILEY PI HOBOKEN PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA PD MAY PY 2022 VL 29 IS 3 BP 857 EP 873 DI 10.1002/cpp.2696 EA DEC 2021 WC Psychology, Clinical SC Psychology ER PT J AU Ryan, S McDonnell, D AF Ryan, Seamus McDonnell, Dean TI "Lock, Load, n' Thank the Driver": The Positive Influence of Prosocial Activity on Language in Online Social Groups SO SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY LA English DT Article DE cyberpsychology; human-computer interaction; Fortnite; gaming behavior; linguistic markers; online communities; prosocial behavior; video games ID VIDEO GAMES; COMMUNITIES; ALTRUISM; PERSISTENCE; BEHAVIOR; EMOTION AB Social-psychological research aims to understand and improve human functioning in a wide variety of contexts. With research showing that trust, joy, and anticipation are among the most influential positive emotions in aspects of online communication, determining the environmental factors that may influence communication and interaction is of significant interest. This research aims to identify the ways prosocial actions influence language within an online social community. Using a longitudinal observational analysis of linguistic markers, an analysis was done on an online community, surrounding the game "Fortnite." At different time intervals, the written dialogue was analyzed for psycholinguistic markers through LIWC to detect variance in tone within the community. Users were queried (n = 9,037), filtered to meet the inclusion criteria (n = 7,221) and having their posts (n = 1,232,741) assigned to three cohorts, those of pre-prosocial, post-prosocial, and post-reciprocity, depending on the posting date. A statistically significant (R-2 = .572) increase in positive emotion linguistic markers was detected in the data set after the prosocial action was added. A change in motivation did not reduce the use of positive emotion linguistic markers, contrary to what was expected. This research observes how individuals within online communities treat each other and that interaction can be influenced to improve the participant's experience and the quality of dialogue. This research addresses how game design and human-computer interaction influence human communication and behavior. It supports that small changes to the real world have ripple effects in online communities for the better. C1 [Ryan, Seamus; McDonnell, Dean] Dun Laoghaire Inst Art Design & Technol, Dublin A96 KH79, Ireland. [Ryan, Seamus] Trinity Coll Dublin, Hlth Technol Design Res Grp, Human Comp Interact, Dublin, Ireland. [McDonnell, Dean] Inst Technol Carlow, Carlow, Ireland. C3 Dun Laoghaire Institute of Art & Design; RLUK- Research Libraries UK; Trinity College Dublin; South East Technological University (SETU) RP Ryan, S (corresponding author), Dun Laoghaire Inst Art Design & Technol, Dublin A96 KH79, Ireland. EM Seamus@SeamusMoose.com CR Akhtar R, 2018, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V132, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.026 Anand P., 2011, P 2 WORKSHOP COMPUTA, P1 Anderson C. A., 2014, VIOLENT NONVIOLENT P [Anonymous], 2018, 14 DAYS FORTNITE [Anonymous], 2018, TOP SUBREDDITS [Anonymous], 2018, V5 30 CONTENT UPDATE [Anonymous], 2018, FORTNITE USAGE REVEN Back EA, 2018, J SOC POLIT PSYCHOL, V6, P76, DOI 10.5964/jspp.v6i1.741 Batson C. D., 2008, HDB MOTIVATION SCI, P135 Berger J, 2012, J MARKETING RES, V49, P192, DOI 10.1509/jmr.10.0353 BRIEF AP, 1986, ACAD MANAGE REV, V11, P710, DOI 10.2307/258391 Duncan-Howell J, 2010, BRIT J EDUC TECHNOL, V41, P324, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953.x Epic Games, 2017, FORTN COMP VID GAM Flekova L., 2018, P 2018 EMNLP WORKSH, P17 Gentile DA, 2009, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V35, P752, DOI 10.1177/0146167209333045 Gerhart B, 2015, ANNU REV ORGAN PSYCH, V2, P489, DOI 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111418 Gong Y, 2018, ACM-BCB'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS, COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, P523, DOI 10.1145/3233547.3233632 Grant A.M., 2012, OXFORD HDB POSITIVE, P28 Grant AM, 2008, J APPL PSYCHOL, V93, P48, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48 Groenewegen P, 2014, RES SOCIOL ORGAN-RES, V40, P463, DOI 10.1108/S0733-558X(2014)0000040023 Guarino S., 2019, SOCIAL BEHAV MODELIN, P407 Guttman N, 2016, J COMMUN, V66, P909, DOI 10.1111/jcom.12267 Hamari J, 2017, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V37, P1449, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.09.004 Hamilton W.L., 2017, 11 INT AAAI C WEB SO Harris R.B., 2007, J APPL SCI RES, V3, P2081 Herring Susan, 2019, ANAL DIGITAL DISCOUR, P25 Hsu MH, 2007, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V65, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.09.003 Huesmann LR, 2010, PSYCHOL BULL, V136, P179, DOI 10.1037/a0018567 Jacobson D, 1999, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V5 Johnson C. M., 2001, Internet and Higher Education, V4, P45, DOI 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00047-1 Kang M, 2016, INFORM TECHNOL PEOPL, V29, P580, DOI 10.1108/ITP-01-2015-0023 Karimi H, 2016, Q J EXP PSYCHOL, V69, P1013, DOI 10.1080/17470218.2015.1053951 Klein C., 2018, PLOS ONE, V14 Kuo YF, 2017, J ELECTRON COMMER RE, V18, P254 Kurzban R, 2015, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V66, P575, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015355 Lee J. E., 2018, EXPLORING RELATIONSH Lerner JS, 2015, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V66, P799, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043 Lin H, 2011, GAMES CULT, V6, P270, DOI 10.1177/1555412010364981 List S., 2017, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, V2017, P16604 Malinen S, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V46, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.004 Manchanda P, 2015, MARKET SCI, V34, P367, DOI 10.1287/mksc.2014.0890 Michael J., PUSHSHIFT IO Newman ML, 2003, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V29, P665, DOI 10.1177/0146167203029005010 Oh HJ, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V30, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.053 Pennebaker J.W., 2007, OPERATORS MANUAL LIN PENNEBAKER JAMES, 2015, DEV PSYCHOMETRIC DEV Phelps EA, 2014, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V37, P263, DOI 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014119 Proyer RT, 2018, J RES PERS, V73, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.10.002 Raposa EB, 2016, CLIN PSYCHOL SCI, V4, P691, DOI 10.1177/2167702615611073 Ratsamy S., 2018, MIXED METHODS ANAL B Razavi AH, 2014, J INTELL INF SYST, V42, P393, DOI 10.1007/s10844-013-0273-4 Root R., 2016, NAVIGATING SOCIOTECH Ryan S., 2019, REDDIT DATA READER Sanchez-Moya A, 2017, QUAD FILOL-ESTUD LIN, V22, P215, DOI 10.7203/qf.22.11309 Secui A, 2016, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V9883, P352, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44748-3_35 Simpson B, 2015, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V41, P43, DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112242 Smith C. H., 2018, 71 AMAZING REDDIT ST Stacey E., 2008, J DISTANCE ED, V22, P43, DOI DOI 10.1177/1350507608101225 Stragier J, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V64, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.013 Sturmer S., 2009, PSYCHOL PROSOCIAL BE Taylor N, 2015, GAMES CULT, V10, P365, DOI 10.1177/1555412014565507 Verhagen T, 2013, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V29, P1430, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.043 Williams RL, 2000, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V41, P81 Zimmerman J. J., 2017, GAMES CULT, V14, P896 NR 64 TC 0 Z9 0 PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD PI LONDON PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND PD APR PY 2020 VL 6 IS 2 AR 2056305120913990 DI 10.1177/2056305120913990 WC Communication SC Communication ER PT J AU Mournet, AM Kleiman, EM AF Mournet, Annabelle M. Kleiman, Evan M. TI Internet-Based Mental Health Survey Research: Navigating Internet Bots on Reddit SO CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING LA English DT Article DE survey research; internet bots; Reddit; mental health; cyberpsychology AB This study was a multistage process of recruiting participants through Reddit with the intent of increasing data integrity when facing an infiltration of Internet bots. Approaches to increase data integrity centered around preventing the occurrence of Internet bots from the onset and increasing the ability to identify Internet bot responses. We attempted to detect bots in a study focused on understanding social factors related to autism and suicide risk. Four recruitment rounds occurred through Reddit on mental health-related subreddits, with one post made on each subreddit per recruitment round. We found high presence of bots in the initial rounds-indeed, using location data, one third of the total responses (33.4 percent; 118/353) came from just eight locations (i.e., 4.7 percent of all locations). The proportion of detected bots was significantly different across the rounds of recruitment (chi(2) = 150.22, df = 3, p < 0.001). In round 4, language advertising compensation was removed from recruitment posts. This round had significantly lower proportions of detected bots compared with round 1 (chi(2) = 33.01, df = 1, p < 0.001), round 2 (chi(2) = 129.14, df = 1, p < 0.001), and round 3 (chi(2) = 46.6, df = 1, p < 0.001). Through a multistage recruitment process, we were able to increase the integrity of our collected data, as determined by a low percentage of fraudulent responses. Only once we removed advertisement of compensation in recruitment posts, did we see a significant decrease in the quantity and percentage of Internet bot responses. This multistage recruitment study provides valuable information regarding how to adapt when an online survey study is infiltrated with Internet bots. C1 [Mournet, Annabelle M.; Kleiman, Evan M.] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Psychol, New Brunswick, NJ USA. [Mournet, Annabelle M.] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Psychol, New Brunswick, NJ 08854 USA. C3 Rutgers State University New Brunswick; Rutgers State University New Brunswick RP Mournet, AM (corresponding author), Rutgers State Univ, Dept Psychol, New Brunswick, NJ 08854 USA. EM amm883@psych.rutgers.edu CR Buchanan EM, 2018, BEHAV RES METHODS, V50, P2586, DOI 10.3758/s13428-018-1035-6 Cresci S, 2020, COMMUN ACM, V63, P72, DOI 10.1145/3409116 Dunham K., 2009, MALICIOUS BOTS OUTSI Godinho A, 2020, SUBST ABUS, V41, P3, DOI 10.1080/08897077.2019.1691131 Griffin Marybec, 2022, Qual Quant, V56, P2841, DOI 10.1007/s11135-021-01252-1 Grov C, 2019, JAIDS-J ACQ IMM DEF, V82, pS253, DOI 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002217 Ibarra JL, 2018, JMIR RES PROTOC, V7, DOI 10.2196/resprot.8071 Luong R, 2022, TEACH PSYCHOL, V49, P329, DOI 10.1177/00986283211020739 Lynch HF, 2019, JAMA NETW OPEN, V2, DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7355 Orabi M, 2020, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102250 Piehlmaier DM., 2022, SAGE RES METHODS CAS, DOI [10.4135/9781529601312, DOI 10.4135/9781529601312] Saunders EC, 2021, PREV MED, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106783 Shatz I, 2017, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V35, P537, DOI 10.1177/0894439316650163 Shrestha P, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0230250 Statista, 2021, REDD US WORLDW 2020 von Ahn L, 2004, COMMUN ACM, V47, P57, DOI 10.1145/966389.966390 von Ahn L, 2008, SCIENCE, V321, P1465, DOI 10.1126/science.1160379 NR 17 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC PI NEW ROCHELLE PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA PD FEB 1 PY 2023 VL 26 IS 2 BP 73 EP 79 DI 10.1089/cyber.2022.0173 EA FEB 2023 WC Psychology, Social SC Psychology ER PT J AU Ure, C Galpin, A Cooper-Ryan, AM Condie, J AF Ure, Cathy Galpin, Adam Cooper-Ryan, Anna Mary Condie, Jenna TI Charities' use of Twitter: exploring social support for women living with and beyond breast cancer SO INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY LA English DT Article DE Breast cancer; tweets; social support; charities; living with and beyond; twitter ID UNMET NEEDS; NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS; NETWORKING SITES; UNITED-KINGDOM; YOUNG-WOMEN; CARE NEEDS; HEALTH; MEDIA; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT AB Twitter is one social media platform that enables those experiencing breast cancer to access support from others. This study explores how cancer charities provide support to women living with and beyond breast cancer (LWBBC) through their Twitter feeds. Seven hundred and seventy-two tweets from seven purposively sampled cancer charities were used to explore Twitter posts made relating to social support. Two questions were posed: (1) what type of support is positioned by cancer charities on Twitter for women LWBBC and (2) what themes emerge from tweet content pertaining to support for women LWBBC? Using a peer-reviewed typology of social support' [Rui, J., Chen, Y., & Damiano, A.(2013). Health organizations providing and seeking social support: A twitter-based content analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, And Social Networking, 16(9), 669-673. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0350], a deductive content analysis was utilised to identify informational, instrumental or emotional social support tweets (n=199). Over half (56%) of tweets offered informational support; 27% provided or sought instrumental support and 18% related to emotional support. Interestingly, 74.3% (n=573) of tweets were not related to providing or seeking social support. An inductive qualitative thematic analysis of the 199 tweets identified the focus (i.e., themes) of support. Three themes were identified: (1) raising awareness, (2) focusing on the future and (3) sharing stories. Cancer charities predominantly use Twitter to signpost women to informational resources and to seek instrumental support to meet charitable objectives. As the number of women LWBBC continues to increase, this study provides valuable insight into how charities represent themselves on Twitter in relation to the social support needs of women LWBBC. C1 [Ure, Cathy; Galpin, Adam; Cooper-Ryan, Anna Mary] Univ Salford, Sch Hlth Sci, Allerton Bldg, Salford M6 6PU, Lancs, England. [Condie, Jenna] Univ Western Australia, Sch Social Sci & Psychol, Perth, WA, Australia. C3 University of Salford; University of Western Australia RP Ure, C (corresponding author), Univ Salford, Sch Hlth Sci, Allerton Bldg, Salford M6 6PU, Lancs, England. EM c.m.ure1@salford.ac.uk CR Aaronson Neil K, 2014, EJC Suppl, V12, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2014.03.005 All-Party Parliamentary Group on Global Health, 2015, UKS CONTR HLTH GLOB Anderson S, 2019, J HEALTH PSYCHOL, V24, P1773, DOI 10.1177/1359105317700254 Artwick CG, 2014, JOURNALISM, V15, P1111, DOI 10.1177/1464884913505030 Atkins L, 2016, QUAL INQ, V22, P253, DOI 10.1177/1077800415574911 Attai DJ, 2015, J MED INTERNET RES, V17, DOI 10.2196/jmir.4721 Bloom JR, 2001, SOC SCI MED, V53, P1513, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00440-8 Boinon D, 2014, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V23, P291, DOI 10.1002/pon.3420 Braun V., 2006, QUALITATIVE RES PSYC, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA] Breast Cancer Care, 2016, BATTL BRAV VICT WHY British Psychological Society, 2009, COD ETH COND GUID PU British Psychological Society, 2013, ETH GUID INT MED RES Burg MA, 2015, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V121, P623, DOI 10.1002/cncr.28951 Burke M, 2016, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V21, P265, DOI 10.1111/jcc4.12162 Cancer Research UK, 2015, CANC TASKF Chae B, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V165, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.037 Chen AT, 2014, LIBR INFORM SCI RES, V36, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.10.007 Cheng KKF, 2016, SUPPORT CARE CANCER, V24, P2025, DOI 10.1007/s00520-015-2994-0 Chou AF, 2012, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V21, P125, DOI 10.1002/pon.1863 Chretien KC, 2011, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V305, P566, DOI 10.1001/jama.2011.68 Debronkart D, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V350, DOI 10.1136/bmj.h148 Drageset S, 2016, SCAND J CARING SCI, V30, P340, DOI 10.1111/scs.12250 Drageset S, 2012, CANCER NURS, V35, pE39, DOI 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31823634aa Elo S, 2008, J ADV NURS, V62, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x Falagas ME, 2007, BREAST CANCER RES, V9, DOI 10.1186/bcr1744 Fiszer C, 2014, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V23, P361, DOI 10.1002/pon.3432 Foley N. M., 2015, British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research, V6, P474, DOI 10.9734/BJMMR/2015/15309 Fong AJ, 2017, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V26, P664, DOI 10.1002/pon.4064 Foster C, 2011, BRIT J CANCER, V105, pS21, DOI 10.1038/bjc.2011.419 Foster C, 2009, EUR J CANCER CARE, V18, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01001.x Gao F., 2010, ELECT NEWS, V4, P218, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1931243110389457, 10.1177/1931243110389457] Garrison Kristen, 2007, DISABILITY STUDIES Q, V27, P4, DOI DOI 10.18061/dsq.v27i4.52 Goldsmith DJ, 2011, ROUTL COMMUN SER, P335 Greenberg J, 2009, GLOB MEDIA J-CAN ED, V2, P63 Harrison JD, 2009, SUPPORT CARE CANCER, V17, P1117, DOI 10.1007/s00520-009-0615-5 HELGESON VS, 1993, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V23, P825, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01008.x Himelboim I, 2014, J HEALTH COMMUN, V19, P210, DOI 10.1080/10810730.2013.811321 Hughes AL, 2009, INT J EMERG MANAG, V6, P248, DOI 10.1504/IJEM.2009.031564 Hunt D, 2015, DIGIT HEALTH, V1, DOI 10.1177/2055207615592513 Jamison-Powell S., 2012, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, DOI [10.1145/2207676.2208612, DOI 10.1145/2207676.2208612] Kroenke CH, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, P1105, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.2846 Lin XL, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V58, P421, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.017 Livingston G., 2009, J NEW COMMUNICATIONS, V4, P87 Loader BD, 2011, INFORM COMMUN SOC, V14, P757, DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648 Lovejoy K, 2012, PUBLIC RELAT REV, V38, P313, DOI 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005 Luke DA, 2011, COMMUN METHODS MEAS, V5, P76, DOI 10.1080/19312458.2010.547823 Lyles CR, 2013, J CANCER EDUC, V28, P127, DOI 10.1007/s13187-012-0432-2 Macmillan Cancer Support, 2015, GEN EL 2015 CAMP MAC Maddams J, 2012, BRIT J CANCER, V107, P1195, DOI 10.1038/bjc.2012.366 Maddams J, 2009, BRIT J CANCER, V101, P541, DOI 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605148 Maher J, 2011, BRIT J CANCER, V105, pS5, DOI 10.1038/bjc.2011.417 Maher J., 2010, ADV BREAST CANC, V7, P17 McCorkle R, 2011, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V61, P50, DOI 10.3322/caac.20093 Merolli M, 2013, J BIOMED INFORM, V46, P957, DOI 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.04.010 Morozov Evgeny, 2009, FOREIGN POLICY Papacharissi Z. A., 2010, PRIVATE SPHERE Park BW, 2012, YONSEI MED J, V53, P118, DOI 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.1.118 Phethean C, 2015, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V9089, P15, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-18609-2_2 Phethean Christopher, 2015, P ACM WEB SCI C, DOI [10.1145/2786451.2786457, DOI 10.1145/2786451.2786457] Phua J, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V72, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041 Rains SA, 2015, COMMUN MONOGR, V82, P403, DOI 10.1080/03637751.2015.1019530 Ream E, 2009, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V76, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.019 Rui JR, 2013, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V16, P669, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0350 Saxton GD, 2014, NONPROF VOLUNT SEC Q, V43, P850, DOI 10.1177/0899764013485159 Scanlon K., 2013, PSYCHOONCOLOGY S3, V22, P1, DOI [10.1111/j.1099-1611.2013.3393, DOI 10.1111/J.1099-1611.2013.3393] Semino E, 2017, BMJ SUPPORT PALLIAT, V7, P60, DOI 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000785 Sisco HF, 2013, INT J NONPROFIT VOLU, V18, P287, DOI 10.1002/nvsm.1474 Smitko K, 2012, PUBLIC RELAT REV, V38, P633, DOI 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.05.012 Sugawara Yuya, 2012, BMC Res Notes, V5, P699, DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-699 Sulik GA, 2011, SOCIOL COMPASS, V5, P463, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00374.x Suwankhong D, 2016, J NURS SCHOLARSHIP, V48, P39, DOI 10.1111/jnu.12179 Thackeray R, 2013, BMC CANCER, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-508 Thoits PA, 2011, J HEALTH SOC BEHAV, V52, P145, DOI 10.1177/0022146510395592 Tsuya A, 2014, J MED INTERNET RES, V16, P110, DOI 10.2196/jmir.3298 Twitter, 2016, PRIV POL Vaismoradi M, 2013, NURS HEALTH SCI, V15, P398, DOI 10.1111/nhs.12048 Waters RD, 2011, PUBLIC RELAT REV, V37, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.002 Wright K. B., 2013, HLTH COMMUNICATION 2 Zimmer M, 2014, ASLIB J INFORM MANAG, V66, P250, DOI 10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0083 NR 79 TC 4 Z9 5 PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD PI ABINGDON PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND PY 2019 VL 22 IS 8 BP 1062 EP 1079 DI 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1402943 WC Communication; Sociology SC Communication; Sociology ER PT J AU Sasinka, C Stachon, Z Sedlak, M Chmelik, J Herman, L Kubicek, P Sasinkova, A Dolezal, M Tejkl, H Urbanek, T Svatonova, H Ugwitz, P Jurik, V AF Sasinka, Cenek Stachon, Zdenek Sedlak, Michal Chmelik, Jiri Herman, Lukas Kubicek, Petr Sasinkova, Alzbeta Dolezal, Milan Tejkl, Hynek Urbanek, Tomas Svatonova, Hana Ugwitz, Pavel Jurik, Vojtech TI Collaborative Immersive Virtual Environments for Education in Geography SO ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION LA English DT Article DE immersive virtual reality; collaborative immersive virtual environment; immersion; sense of presence; telepresence; Head-mounted display; cyberpsychology; human-computer interaction; collaborative learning; hypsography; contour lines; map literacy ID LEARNING OUTCOMES; REALITY EXPOSURE; EXPERIENCE; SIMULATIONS; K-12 AB Immersive virtual reality (iVR) devices are rapidly becoming an important part of our lives and forming a new way for people to interact with computers and each other. The impact and consequences of this innovative technology have not yet been satisfactory explored. This empirical study investigated the cognitive and social aspects of collaboration in a shared, immersive virtual reality. A unique application for implementing a collaborative immersive virtual environment (LIVE) was developed by our interdisciplinary team as a software solution for educational purposes, with two scenarios for learning about hypsography, i.e., explanations of contour line principles. Both scenarios allow switching between a usual 2D contour map and a 3D model of the corresponding terrain to increase the intelligibility and clarity of the educational content. Gamification principles were also applied to both scenarios to augment user engagement during the completion of tasks. A qualitative research approach was adopted to obtain a deep insight into the lived experience of users in a LIVE. It was thus possible to form a deep understanding of very new subject matter. Twelve pairs of participants were observed during their LIVE experience and then interviewed either in a semistructured interview or a focus group. Data from these three research techniques were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis, which is research method for studying individual experience. Four superordinate themes-with detailed descriptions of experiences shared by numerous participants-emerged as results from the analysis; we called these (1) Appreciation for having a collaborator, (2) The Surprising "Fun with Maps", (3) Communication as a challenge, and (4) Cognition in two realities. The findings of the study indicate the importance of the social dimension during education in a virtual environment and the effectiveness of dynamic and interactive 3D visualization. C1 [Sasinka, Cenek; Sasinkova, Alzbeta] Masaryk Univ, Fac Arts, Div Informat & Lib Studies, Brno 60200, Czech Republic. [Stachon, Zdenek; Herman, Lukas; Kubicek, Petr; Ugwitz, Pavel] Masaryk Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Geog, CS-61137 Brno, Czech Republic. [Sedlak, Michal; Tejkl, Hynek; Urbanek, Tomas; Jurik, Vojtech] Masaryk Univ, Fac Arts, Dept Psychol, Brno 60200, Czech Republic. [Chmelik, Jiri; Dolezal, Milan] Masaryk Univ, Fac Informat, Dept Visual Comp, Brno 60200, Czech Republic. [Sasinkova, Alzbeta] Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Dept Psychol, Brno 60200, Czech Republic. [Svatonova, Hana] Masaryk Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Geog, Brno 60300, Czech Republic. [Ugwitz, Pavel; Jurik, Vojtech] Masaryk Univ, Fac Arts, HUME Lab, Brno 60200, Czech Republic. C3 Masaryk University Brno; Masaryk University Brno; Masaryk University Brno; Masaryk University Brno; Masaryk University Brno; Masaryk University Brno; Masaryk University Brno RP Stachon, Z (corresponding author), Masaryk Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Geog, CS-61137 Brno, Czech Republic.; Sedlak, M (corresponding author), Masaryk Univ, Fac Arts, Dept Psychol, Brno 60200, Czech Republic.; Chmelik, J (corresponding author), Masaryk Univ, Fac Informat, Dept Visual Comp, Brno 60200, Czech Republic. EM cenek.sasinka@mail.muni.cz; zstachon@geogr.muni.cz; m.sedlak@mail.muni.cz; jchmelik@mail.muni.cz; herman.lu@mail.muni.cz; kubicek@geogr.muni.cz; st.betty@mail.muni.cz; legacycz@mail.muni.cz; 449327@mail.muni.cz; tour@mail.muni.cz; svatonova@mail.muni.cz; 172577@mail.muni.cz; jurik.vojtech@mail.muni.cz FU Masaryk University, Czech Republic [MUNI/M/0846/2015] FX This research was funded by Masaryk University, Czech Republic, Grant No. MUNI/M/0846/2015, "Influence of cartographic visualization methods on the success of solving practical and educational spatial tasks". CR Aardema F, 2010, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V13, P429, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2009.0164 Abulrub AG, 2011, INT J EMERG TECHNOL, V6, P4, DOI 10.3991/ijet.v6i4.1766 Anderson-Hanley C, 2012, AM J PREV MED, V42, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.016 Ang C. S., 2008, INT J ELEARNING, V7, P181 Bailenson JN, 2001, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V10, P583, DOI 10.1162/105474601753272844 Bailenson JN, 2003, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V29, P819, DOI 10.1177/0146167203029007002 Batty M, 2008, BLACKW COMPANION GEO, P317 Bertella L, 2001, PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AUG, V10, P440, DOI 10.1162/1054746011470280 Bi-Wen Lee, 2017, 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI). Proceedings, P792, DOI 10.1109/ICASI.2017.7988550 Bideau B, 2010, IEEE COMPUT GRAPH, V30, P14, DOI 10.1109/MCG.2009.134 Botella C, 2007, CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, V14, P164, DOI 10.1002/cpp.524 Brannen J., 1992, MIXING METHODS QUALI Callieri M., 2011, ACM J COMPUT CULT HE, V3, P1, DOI 10.1145/1957825.1957827 Carrera CC, 2018, INT RES GEOGR ENVIRO, V27, P69, DOI 10.1080/10382046.2017.1285135 Carbonell-Carrera C, 2017, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V6, DOI 10.3390/ijgi6090261 Chen Q., 2012, COLLABORATIVE LEARNI, P154 Chengyuan Lai, 2016, Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. 8th International Conference, VAMR 2016, held as part of HCI International 2016. Proceedings: LNCS 9740, P702, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39907-2_67 Cho BH, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P129, DOI 10.1089/109493102753770516 Cook D, 1998, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V51, P441, DOI 10.1023/A:1005909420690 CRUZNEIRA C, 1992, COMMUN ACM, V35, P64, DOI 10.1145/129888.129892 Csikszentmihaiyi M., 1990, FLOW PSYCHOL OPTIMAL David S, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN OF COMMUNICATION (ISDOC2014), P1, DOI 10.1145/2618168.2618169 de la Pena N, 2010, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V19, P291, DOI 10.1162/PRES_a_00005 Dewey J., 1938, EXPERIENCE ED Dillenbourg P., 1999, ADV LEARNING INSTRUC Dinis FM, 2017, IEEE GLOB ENG EDUC C, P1195, DOI 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7943000 Dolezal M, 2017, INT CONF GAMES VIRTU, P272, DOI 10.1109/VS-GAMES.2017.8056613 dos Reis PRJ, 2015, SYMP VIRTUAL AUGMENT, P121, DOI 10.1109/SVR.2015.24 Duschl R. A., 2002, STUDIES SCI ED, V38, P39, DOI DOI 10.1080/03057260208560187 El-Mounayri H., 2016, 2016 ASEE ANN C EXP, DOI [10.18260/p.26336, DOI 10.18260/P.26336] Fisher P., 2001, VIRTUAL REALITY GEOG Friesen, 1975, UNMASKING FACE GUIDE Garcia-Palacios A, 2001, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V4, P341, DOI 10.1089/109493101300210231 Gee James P., 2008, WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAV Gokhale A., 1995, J TECHNOLOGY ED, V7, P1045, DOI DOI 10.21061/JTE.V7I1.A.2 Guttentag DA, 2010, TOURISM MANAGE, V31, P637, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.003 Guzdial M, 1996, COMMUN ACM, V39, P43, DOI 10.1145/227210.227600 Halabi O, 2017, INT J EMERG TECHNOL, V12, P50, DOI 10.3991/ijet.v12i05.6766 Harding-Smith T., 1993, LEARNING TOGETHER IN Havenith HB, 2019, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V12, P173, DOI 10.1080/17538947.2017.1365960 He TY, 2017, P IEEE VIRT REAL ANN, P307, DOI 10.1109/VR.2017.7892299 Herman L., 2018, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMME, VXLII-4, P261, DOI [10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-261-2018, DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLII-4-261-2018] Hew KF, 2010, BRIT J EDUC TECHNOL, V41, P33, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.x Hirmas D. R., 2014, J GEOSCIENCE ED, V62, P126, DOI DOI 10.5408/12-362.1 Hogan K., 2017, ADV LEARNING TEACHIN, P74 Horvath I, 2016, INT CONF COGN INFO, P359, DOI 10.1109/CogInfoCom.2016.7804576 Huber T, 2017, SURG ENDOSC, V31, P4472, DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5500-6 Jackson R. L., 2000, CVE 2000. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, P83, DOI 10.1145/351006.351018 Johnson DW, 1999, THEOR PRACT, V38, P67, DOI 10.1080/00405849909543834 Johnson R. B., 2004, EDUC RESEARCHER, V33, P14, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X033007014, 10.3102/0013189X033007014] Jung TH, 2017, J PLACE MANAG DEV, V10, P140, DOI 10.1108/JPMD-07-2016-0045 Jurik V, 2016, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V41, P663, DOI 10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B2-663-2016 Kaufmann H, 2006, P IEEE VIRT REAL ANN, P51, DOI 10.1109/VR.2006.48 Keefe FJ, 2012, PAIN, V153, P2163, DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2012.05.030 Kilmon CA, 2010, NURS EDUC PERSPECT, V31, P314 Kolb D.A., 1984, EXPERIENTIAL LEARNIN, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7223-8.50017-4 Koneny M., 2011, ANN GIS, V17, P135, DOI DOI 10.1080/19475683.2011.602027 Kreylos O., 2006, P 2006 ACM INT C VIR, P155, DOI [10.1145/1128923.1128948, DOI 10.1145/1128923.1128948] Kubicek P, 2019, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V12, P156, DOI 10.1080/17538947.2017.1382581 Kyndt E, 2013, EDUC RES REV-NETH, V10, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002 La Viola J. J. Jr., 2000, SIGCHI Bulletin, V32, P47, DOI 10.1145/333329.333344 Lalley J. P., 2010, INT J ENV SCI ED, V5, P189 Lee EAL, 2010, COMPUT EDUC, V55, P1424, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006 Lehtinen E., 1999, JHGI GIESBERS REPORT, V10, P1999 Lin H., 2001, GEOGRAPHIC INFORM SC, V7, P1, DOI [10.1080/10824000109480550, DOI 10.1080/10824000109480550] Lin H, 2015, T GIS, V19, P493, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12167 Lin H, 2013, EARTH-SCI REV, V126, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.08.001 Lin H, 2013, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V103, P465, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2012.689234 Masrur A., 2017, P WORKSH IMM AN EXPL, P1 Matsas E, 2017, INT J INTERACT DES M, V11, P139, DOI 10.1007/s12008-015-0259-2 Merchant Z, 2014, COMPUT EDUC, V70, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033 Mirelman A, 2011, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V66, P234, DOI 10.1093/gerona/glq201 Mol ACA, 2008, IEEE COMPUT GRAPH, V28, P6 Molka-Danielsen J., 2017, NORSK K ORG BRUK INF, V25, P1 Moller H.J., 2014, INTERACTING PRESENCE, P102 NEALE DC, 1990, ELEM SCHOOL J, V91, P109, DOI 10.1086/461641 O'Donnell A.M., 2013, INT HDB COLLABORATIV, P13 O'Donnell A. M., 1992, INTERACTION COOPERAT, DOI DOI 10.1080/00461520.1998.9653294 ODONNELL AM, 1986, J EXP EDUC, V54, P169, DOI 10.1080/00220973.1986.10806417 Okada T, 1997, COGNITIVE SCI, V21, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80020-2 Ordaz N, 2015, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V75, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.247 Parong J, 2018, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V110, P785, DOI 10.1037/edu0000241 Philips A, 2015, J GEOGR HIGHER EDUC, V39, P437, DOI 10.1080/03098265.2015.1066314 Piaget J., 1950, PSYCHOL INTELLIGENCE Reid K, 2005, PSYCHOLOGIST, V18, P20 Romano DM, 2005, DEV MED CHILD NEUROL, V47, P580, DOI 10.1017/S0012162205001143 Shen S, 2018, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V7, DOI 10.3390/ijgi7020054 Siemens G., 2014, INT J INSTR TECHNOL, V2, P1 SLAVIN RE, 1983, PSYCHOL BULL, V94, P429, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.94.3.429 Smith J. A., 1999, QUALITATIVE HLTH PSY, P218, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446217870.N14 Smith JA., 2009, INTERPRETATIVE PHENO Smith JA., 2004, QUALITATIVE RES PSYC, V1, P39, DOI DOI 10.1191/1478088704QP004OA Smith JA, 2008, QUALITATIVE PSYCHOL, P53, DOI DOI 10.1037/13620-005 Staurset EM, 2016, SMART INNOV SYST TEC, V59, P423, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39690-3_38 Stefan L, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V51, P1056, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.287 Stojsic I., 2016, J SUBJECT DIDACTICS, V1, P83, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.438169, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.438169] Symeonides R, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V51, P539, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.015 Tu C.H., 2004, ONLINE COLLABORATIVE van der Linden A, 2016, PROCEEDINGS VRCAI 2016: 15TH ACM SIGGRAPH CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL-REALITY CONTINUUM AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN INDUSTRY, P165, DOI 10.1145/3014033.3014040 Virtanen JP, 2015, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V4, P837, DOI 10.3390/ijgi4020837 Vygotsky L., 1997, INTERACTION LEARNING Vygotsky L. S., 1978, MIND SOC DEV HIGHER Waterworth J., 2004, P BRIT COMP SOC HCI WEBB NM, 1994, AM EDUC RES J, V31, P369, DOI 10.3102/00028312031002369 Wen-Chun Hsu, 2017, 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI). Proceedings, P1568, DOI 10.1109/ICASI.2017.7988228 Witmer BG, 1998, PRESENCE-TELEOP VIRT, V7, P225, DOI 10.1162/105474698565686 Zanola S., 2009, P 24 INT CART C ICC, P15, DOI DOI 10.5167/UZH-27017 Zhang S., 2013, REMOTE SENS SPAT INF, V22, P145, DOI [10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-2-w2-145-2013, DOI 10.5194/ISPRSARCHIVES-XL-2-W2-145-2013] Zyda M, 2005, COMPUTER, V38, P25, DOI 10.1109/MC.2005.297 NR 109 TC 48 Z9 49 PU MDPI PI BASEL PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND PD JAN PY 2019 VL 8 IS 1 AR 3 DI 10.3390/ijgi8010003 WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Geography, Physical; Remote Sensing SC Computer Science; Physical Geography; Remote Sensing ER PT J AU Grist, R Porter, J Stallard, P AF Grist, Rebecca Porter, Joanna Stallard, Paul TI Mental Health Mobile Apps for Preadolescents and Adolescents: A Systematic Review SO JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH LA English DT Review DE mobile apps; smartphone apps; mHealth; mental health; self-help; child; adolescent; preadolescent; review ID COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY; SMARTPHONE APPLICATION; PHONE APPLICATION; YOUNG-PEOPLE; ANXIETY; DISORDERS; CHILDREN; INTERVENTIONS; MOOD AB Background: There are an increasing number of mobile apps available for adolescents with mental health problems and an increasing interest in assimilating mobile health (mHealth) into mental health services. Despite the growing number of apps available, the evidence base for their efficacy is unclear. Objective: This review aimed to systematically appraise the available research evidence on the efficacy and acceptability of mobile apps for mental health in children and adolescents younger than 18 years. Methods: The following were systematically searched for relevant publications between January 2008 and July 2016: APA PsychNet, ACM Digital Library, Cochrane Library, Community Care Inform-Children, EMBASE, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Social Policy and Practice, Web of Science, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, and OpenGrey. Abstracts were included if they described mental health apps (targeting depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, self-harm, suicide prevention, conduct disorder, eating disorders and body image issues, schizophrenia, psychosis, and insomnia) for mobile devices and for use by adolescents younger than 18 years. Results: A total of 24 publications met the inclusion criteria. These described 15 apps, two of which were available to download. Two small randomized trials and one case study failed to demonstrate a significant effect of three apps on intended mental health outcomes. Articles that analyzed the content of six apps for children and adolescents that were available to download established that none had undergone any research evaluation. Feasibility outcomes suggest acceptability of apps was good and app usage was moderate. Conclusions: Overall, there is currently insufficient research evidence to support the effectiveness of apps for children, preadolescents, and adolescents with mental health problems. Given the number and pace at which mHealth apps are being released on app stores, methodologically robust research studies evaluating their safety, efficacy, and effectiveness is promptly needed. C1 [Grist, Rebecca; Stallard, Paul] Univ Bath, Dept Hlth, Child & Adolescent Mental Hlth Grp, Wessex House, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England. [Porter, Joanna; Stallard, Paul] Oxford Hlth Natl Hlth Serv Fdn Trust, Child & Family Mental Hlth, Temple House, Keynsham, England. C3 University of Bath RP Grist, R (corresponding author), Univ Bath, Dept Hlth, Child & Adolescent Mental Hlth Grp, Wessex House, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England. EM r.grist@bath.ac.uk CR Aguirre RTP, 2013, J TECHNOL HUMAN SERV, V31, P269, DOI 10.1080/15228835.2013.814750 Anthes E, 2016, NATURE, V532, P20, DOI 10.1038/532020a Apple, 2016, NUMB APPS AV LEAD AP Archangeli C, 2017, CHILD ADOL PSYCH CL, V26, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.chc.2016.07.009 Bakker D, 2016, JMIR MENT HEALTH, V3, DOI 10.2196/mental.4984 Birney AJ, 2016, JMIR MHEALTH UHEALTH, V4, P100, DOI 10.2196/mhealth.4231 Christensen H, 2009, J MED INTERNET RES, V11, DOI 10.2196/jmir.1194 Dagoo J, 2014, J ANXIETY DISORD, V28, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.02.003 Donker T, 2013, J MED INTERNET RES, V15, DOI 10.2196/jmir.2791 East ML, 2015, JMIR MENT HEALTH, V2, DOI 10.2196/mental.3954 eMarketer, 2013, SMARTPH INCR UK KIDS Ericsson, 2016, ERICSSON MOBILITY RE Eysenbach G, 2005, J MED INTERNET RES, V7, DOI 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11 Farrington C, 2014, GLOBALIZATION HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-10-17 Fleming TM, 2017, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00215 Fleming TM, 2016, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00065 Ford T, 2014, ANN REPORT CHIEF MED Green H., 2005, MENTAL HLTH CHILDREN Gulliver A, 2010, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-244X-10-113 Haine-Schlagel R, 2015, CLIN CHILD FAM PSYCH, V18, P133, DOI 10.1007/s10567-015-0182-x Hollis C, 2017, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V58, P474, DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12663 Huguet A, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0154248 Juarascio AS, 2015, INT J MED INFORM, V84, P808, DOI 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.004 Kauer SD, 2012, J MED INTERNET RES, V14, P15, DOI 10.2196/jmir.1858 Kennard BD, 2015, J TECHNOL HUMAN SERV, V33, P345, DOI 10.1080/15228835.2015.1106384 Kenny R, 2016, HEALTH INFORM J, V22, P265, DOI 10.1177/1460458214555041 Kenny R, 2015, JMIR MENT HEALTH, V2, DOI 10.2196/mental.4370 Kim-Cohen J, 2003, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V60, P709, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.709 Kumar S, 2013, AM J PREV MED, V45, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.017 Leigh S, 2015, EVID-BASED MENT HEAL, V18, P97, DOI 10.1136/eb-2015-102203 Loventoft P.K., 2012, P 12 PARTICIPATORY D, P1, DOI DOI 10.1145/2348144.2348146 Martinez-Perez B, 2013, J MED INTERNET RES, V15, DOI 10.2196/jmir.2600 Matthews M, 2008, BRIT J GUID COUNS, V36, P113, DOI 10.1080/03069880801926400 Matthews M, 2011, 29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P2947 Merikangas KR, 2010, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V49, P980, DOI 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017 National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2014, E THER SYST REV CHIL Nicholas J, 2015, J MED INTERNET RES, V17, DOI 10.2196/jmir.4581 Niendam T, 2015, NEUR 2015 DEC ACNP 5, pS473, DOI [10.1038/npp.2014.282, DOI 10.1038/NPP.2014.282] O'Brien KHM, 2017, ARCH SUICIDE RES, V21, P254, DOI 10.1080/13811118.2016.1182094 Ofcom, 2014, CHILDR PAR MED US AT Olff M, 2015, EUR J PSYCHOTRAUMATO, V6, DOI 10.3402/ejpt.v6.27882 Patwardhan M., 2015, P C WIR HLTH 2015 WH, P8, DOI [10.1145/2811780.2811954, DOI 10.1145/2811780.2811954] Pennant ME, 2015, BEHAV RES THER, V67, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2015.01.009 Pramana G, 2014, TELEMED E-HEALTH, V20, P419, DOI 10.1089/tmj.2013.0214 Price M, 2014, CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, V21, P427, DOI 10.1002/cpp.1855 Reid SC, 2013, BMC FAM PRACT, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-14-84 Reid SC, 2012, AUST FAM PHYSICIAN, V41, P711 Reid SC, 2011, BMC FAM PRACT, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-12-131 Reid SC, 2009, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V44, P501, DOI 10.1007/s00127-008-0455-5 Richardson T, 2010, CLIN CHILD FAM PSYCH, V13, P275, DOI 10.1007/s10567-010-0069-9 Scotti J., 2014, THESIS Stallard P, 2010, BEHAV COGN PSYCHOTH, V38, P545, DOI 10.1017/S1352465810000421 The National Institute for Health Research Horizon Scanning Research Intelligence Centre, 2015, NEW EM MOB HLTH INT Torous J, 2016, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V3, P100, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00565-9 Tregarthen JP, 2015, INT J EAT DISORDER, V48, P972, DOI 10.1002/eat.22386 van Ballegooijen W, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0100674 Veldhuis J, 2014, THESIS Verstappen M, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION WITH MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICES (MOBILEHCI'14), P431, DOI 10.1145/2628363.2633573 Watts S, 2013, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-244X-13-49 Whitehouse SR, 2013, JMIR RES PROTOC, V2, DOI 10.2196/resprot.2865 Whiteside SPH, 2016, J CHILD ADOL PSYCHOP, V26, P246, DOI 10.1089/cap.2015.0010 Whiteside SPH, 2014, CLIN CASE STUD, V13, P80, DOI 10.1177/1534650113504822 Wicks P, 2015, BMC MED, V13, DOI 10.1186/s12916-015-0451-z Woodward LJ, 2001, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V40, P1086, DOI 10.1097/00004583-200109000-00018 NR 64 TC 194 Z9 194 PU JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC PI TORONTO PA 59 WINNERS CIRCLE, TORONTO, ON M4L 3Y7, CANADA PD MAY PY 2017 VL 19 IS 5 AR e176 DI 10.2196/jmir.7332 WC Health Care Sciences & Services; Medical Informatics SC Health Care Sciences & Services; Medical Informatics ER PT J AU Vacean, AC AF Vacean, Alin-Corneliu TI Octaves and Fifths Hidden in Cyberspace SO INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY IN MUSICAL FIELD LA English DT Article DE Cyberspace; Internet; legal norms; internet law; hacker; Criminal Code; European Union law; cyberpsychology; cybercrime; hidden octaves and fifths AB Lato sensu when we encounter in treatises on harmony the notion of octaves and parallel/anti-parallel or direct fifths, we find out that these movements of the voices in the tonal-functional harmony are as a rule prohibited for a number of reasons. Alexandru Pascanu motivated these interdictions related to the parallel fifths as follows "the reason for this categorical interdiction does not reside in the fact that it sounds bad (as they say), but rather in a stylistic imperative. The parallel fifths, reminiscences of the primitive polyphonic forms, create a modal atmosphere that contradicts the tonal ambience". The challenge in this article consists in making a parallel between the rules of harmony, of voice leading, that we musicians know only too well, and those other rules - the rules of law (applicable in cyberspace) - which could be very concisely defined as: "those general and abstract rules that regulate the conduct of law subjects in their legal relationships or simply the rules of social conduct or morals". Using transposition and focusing on the rules that address the active or passive participants in cyberspace, we shall be able to identify a series of rules/norms that govern this electronic realm, and implicitly, reveal a range of illicit conducts, as a consequence of the breach of these rules by users. The availability and accessibility of the Internet have brought about personal and social changes. There has been an important increase in the number of human activities that have moved face-to-face encounters from the physical space into cyberspace through online activities - particularly during this pandemic - and these new habits are slowly changing customs, practices, priorities, governing, and even human culture. In cyberspace people behave in a manner that requires new concepts in psychology, as well as in the realm of national, European, and international law, which require the use of old psychological knowledge, as well as the articulation of new ideas in order to understand and explain the human behaviour in cyberspace. C1 [Vacean, Alin-Corneliu] Aurel Vlaicu Univ Arad, Arad, Romania. C3 Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad RP Vacean, AC (corresponding author), Aurel Vlaicu Univ Arad, Arad, Romania. EM composer_alin@yahoo.com CR Bernik I, 2015, CYBERCRIME CYBERWARF Bogdan T, 2020, PSIHOLOGIE JUDICIARA Cimpoeru D, 2012, DREPTUL INTERNETULUI Corlaeanu S., DREPTUL NO 11 2004 Dobrinoiu M, 2006, INFRACTIUNI DOMENIUL Hotca M. A, 2008, INFRACTIUNI PREVAZUT Ioni G. I., INFRACTIUNILE SFERA, V2nd Klander L, 1999, ANTIHACKER GHIDUL SE Mitrache C, 2004, DREPT PENAL ROMAN PA Raufer X, 2015, CYBER CRIMININOLOGIE Tranca A, 2014, INFRACTIUNILE INFORM Turk H. P., 2002, ARMONIA DIATONICA NE, VI WILLIAMS M. L., 2006, VIRTUALLY CRIMINAL C Yar M., 2019, CYBERCRIME SOC, V3rd NR 14 TC 0 Z9 0 PU MEDIA MUSICA PI CLUJ-NAPOCA PA STR ICBRATIANU NR 25, CLUJ-NAPOCA, 00000, ROMANIA PY 2021 VL 12 IS 1 BP 47 EP 58 WC Music SC Music ER PT J AU Caponnetto, P Triscari, S Maglia, M Quattropani, MC AF Caponnetto, Pasquale Triscari, Sergio Maglia, Marilena Quattropani, Maria C. TI The Simulation Game-Virtual Reality Therapy for the Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder: A Systematic Review SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH LA English DT Review DE virtual reality; virtual reality exposure therapy; social anxiety disorder; social phobia; VRET; cyberpsychology ID COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY; PUBLIC SPEAKING ANXIETY; EXPOSURE AB (1) Background: With the term Virtual reality (VR) we refer to a three-dimensional environment generated by the computer, in which subjects interact with the environment as if they were really inside it. The most used VR tools are the so-called HMD (head-mounted display) which make it possible to achieve what theorists define "direct mediated action". The aim of our systematic review is specifically to investigate the applications of virtual reality therapy for the treatment of social anxiety disorder, also known as social phobia. The most common treatment for social anxiety disorder is represented by "in vivo exposure therapy" (iVET). This method consists of exposing the participant, in a gradual and controlled way, to anxious stimuli, with the goal to change the subject's response to the object or situation that is causing the fear. However, the main flaw of "in Vivo therapies" is represented by both the huge costs involved and the possible disturbance variables that can hinder the execution of the therapeutic treatment. Virtual reality exposure therapy could therefore, if confirmed in its effectiveness, constitute a solution to eliminate these two defects demonstrated by "in vivo exposure therapy". The goal is to use VR as a means for the clinician to build a tailor-made path for the participant in order to make him acquire "in virtual" those skills necessary for a good adaptation in the "real" world. (2) Methods: From February 2021 until the date of submission of the article (September 2021), we conducted a systematic review aiming to verify the effectiveness of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) for the treatment of SAD. (3) Results: We identified a total of 205 unique articles. Among these, 20 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 5 of these met the eligibility criteria and were, therefore, included in the final systematic review. (4) Conclusions: Virtual reality therapies proved to be a valid alternative to the acquisition of social skills suitable for improving the symptoms of SAD. Although there has not been a significant difference between VRET and iVET, the low costs and flexibility of VRET open up new scenarios for achieving greater psychophysical well-being. C1 [Caponnetto, Pasquale; Triscari, Sergio; Maglia, Marilena; Quattropani, Maria C.] Univ Catania, Dept Educ Sci, Sect Psychol, I-95124 Catania, Italy. [Caponnetto, Pasquale; Maglia, Marilena] Univ Catania, Ctr Excellence Accelerat Harm Reduct COEHAR, I-95123 Catania, Italy. [Caponnetto, Pasquale; Maglia, Marilena] CTA Villa Chiara Psychiat Rehabil Clin & Res, I-95030 Mascalucia, Italy. C3 University of Catania; University of Catania RP Caponnetto, P; Maglia, M (corresponding author), Univ Catania, Dept Educ Sci, Sect Psychol, I-95124 Catania, Italy.; Caponnetto, P; Maglia, M (corresponding author), Univ Catania, Ctr Excellence Accelerat Harm Reduct COEHAR, I-95123 Catania, Italy.; Caponnetto, P; Maglia, M (corresponding author), CTA Villa Chiara Psychiat Rehabil Clin & Res, I-95030 Mascalucia, Italy. EM p.caponnetto@unict.it; sergio.triscari@studium.unict.it; m.maglia@unict.it; maria.quattropani@unict.it CR Anderson PL, 2013, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V81, P751, DOI 10.1037/a0033559 Barbato S., 2017, FINESTRE FUTURO Bouchard S, 2017, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V210, P276, DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.184234 Caponnetto P, 2019, HEALTH PSYCHOL RES, V7, P40, DOI 10.4081/hpr.2019.8559 Galeazzi A., 2011, PSICOTER COGN COMPOR, V17, P31 Gramaglia G., 2013, REALT VIRTUALE PSICO Kampmann IL, 2016, BEHAV RES THER, V77, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.016 Kelson JN, 2021, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V24, P633, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2021.0090 Kim HJ, 2020, J MED INTERNET RES, V22, DOI 10.2196/23024 Krzystanek M, 2021, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737351 RAPEE RM, 1992, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V101, P728, DOI 10.1037/0021-843X.101.4.728 Riva G., 2019, REALTA VIRTUALI ASPE Riva G, 2012, PSICOLOGIA NUOVI MED Riva G, 2016, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00164 Rizzolatti G, 2004, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V27, P169, DOI 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 Robillard G, 2011, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V167, P105, DOI 10.3233/978-1-60750-766-6-105 Safir MP, 2012, BEHAV MODIF, V36, P235, DOI 10.1177/0145445511429999 Freitas JRS, 2021, PSYCHIAT QUART, V92, P1685, DOI 10.1007/s11126-021-09935-6 Smith J.D., 2000, P NATO MOD SIM C SHR Sterne JAC, 2019, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V366, DOI 10.1136/bmj.l4898 Verhagen AP, 2001, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V54, P651, DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00360-7 Wallach HS, 2009, BEHAV MODIF, V33, P314, DOI 10.1177/0145445509331926 Wechsler TF, 2019, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01758 NR 23 TC 6 Z9 6 PU MDPI PI BASEL PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND PD DEC PY 2021 VL 18 IS 24 AR 13209 DI 10.3390/ijerph182413209 WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ER PT J AU Kelley, T Amon, MJ Bertenthal, BI AF Kelley, Timothy Amon, Mary J. Bertenthal, Bennett I. TI Statistical Models for Predicting Threat Detection From Human Behavior SO FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY LA English DT Article DE threat detection; statistical models; phishing; mouse tracking; human dynamics; cyber security; cyberpsychology ID APPROXIMATE ENTROPY; SECURITY KNOWLEDGE; COMPETITION; CONFIDENCE; DECISIONS; ATTENTION; SELECTION AB Users must regularly distinguish between secure and insecure cyber platforms in order to preserve their privacy and safety. Mouse tracking is an accessible, high-resolution measure that can be leveraged to understand the dynamics of perception, categorization, and decision-making in threat detection. Researchers have begun to utilize measures like mouse tracking in cyber security research, including in the study of risky online behavior. However, it remains an empirical question to what extent real-time information about user behavior is predictive of user outcomes and demonstrates added value compared to traditional self-report questionnaires. Participants navigated through six simulated websites, which resembled either secure "non-spoof" or insecure "spoof" versions of popular websites. Websites also varied in terms of authentication level (i.e., extended validation, standard validation, or partial encryption). Spoof websites had modified Uniform Resource Locator (URL) and authentication level. Participants chose to "login" to or "back" out of each website based on perceived website security. Mouse tracking information was recorded throughout the task, along with task performance. After completing the website identification task, participants completed a questionnaire assessing their security knowledge and degree of familiarity with the websites simulated during the experiment. Despite being primed to the possibility of website phishing attacks, participants generally showed a bias for logging in to websites versus backing out of potentially dangerous sites. Along these lines, participant ability to identify spoof websites was around the level of chance. Hierarchical Bayesian logistic models were used to compare the accuracy of two-factor (i.e., website security and encryption level), survey-based (i.e., security knowledge and website familiarity), and real-time measures (i.e., mouse tracking) in predicting risky online behavior during phishing attacks. Participant accuracy in identifying spoof and non-spoof websites was best captured using a model that included real-time indicators of decision-making behavior, as compared to two-factor and survey-based models. Findings validate three widely applicable measures of user behavior derived from mouse tracking recordings, which can be utilized in cyber security and user intervention research. Survey data alone are not as strong at predicting risky Internet behavior as models that incorporate real-time measures of user behavior, such as mouse tracking. C1 [Kelley, Timothy] US Naval Surface Warfare Ctr, Crane Div, Crane, IN 47522 USA. [Amon, Mary J.; Bertenthal, Bennett I.] Indiana Univ Bloomington, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Bloomington, IN USA. C3 United States Department of Defense; United States Navy; US Navy Naval Air Systems Command; Indiana University System; Indiana University Bloomington RP Kelley, T (corresponding author), US Naval Surface Warfare Ctr, Crane Div, Crane, IN 47522 USA. EM timothy.d.kelley1@navy.mil FU Army Research Laboratory [W911NF-13-2-0045]; NSWC Crane FX The research was sponsored by the Army Research Laboratory and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-13-2-0045 (ARL Cyber Security CRA). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation here on. Additional funding provided by NSWC Crane. CR Abielmona R, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERFACES AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS, P151 Ablon Lillian, 2014, MARKETS CYBERCRIME T, P1, DOI DOI 10.7249/J.CTT6WQ7Z6 Almuhimedi Hazim, 2014, 10 S USBL PRIV SEC S, P113 Alsharnouby M, 2015, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V82, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.005 Anti- Phishing Working Group [APWG], 2016, Q42016 APWG, P14 Arianezhad M., 2013, P 3 ACM C DAT APPL S, P105, DOI DOI 10.1145/2435349.2435362 Ben-Asher N, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V48, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.039 Cisek P, 2005, NEURON, V45, P801, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.027 Dale R, 2007, MEM COGNITION, V35, P15, DOI 10.3758/BF03195938 Dale R, 2011, COGNITIVE SCI, V35, P983, DOI 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01164.x Dhamija R., 2006, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, DOI DOI 10.1145/1124772.1124861 Downs J. S., 2007, P ANT WORK GROUPS 2, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1299015.1299019, 10.1145/1299015.1299019] Freeman JB, 2008, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V137, P673, DOI 10.1037/a0013875 Freeman JB, 2011, FRONT PSYCHOL, V2, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059 Freeman JB, 2010, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V46, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.002 Garg V., 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), P3278, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2012.245 Gelman A, 1995, SOCIOL METHODOL, V25, P165, DOI 10.2307/271064 GELMAN A., 2014, CHAPMAN HALLCRC TEXT, V3, DOI DOI 10.1201/B16018 Gelman A., 2013, UNDERSTANDING PREDIC Gelman A, 2012, J RES EDUC EFF, V5, P189, DOI 10.1080/19345747.2011.618213 Gelman A, 2008, ANN APPL STAT, V2, P1360, DOI 10.1214/08-AOAS191 Ghosh J, 2018, BAYESIAN ANAL, V13, P359, DOI 10.1214/17-BA1051 GOODALE MA, 1986, NATURE, V320, P748, DOI 10.1038/320748a0 Heartfield R, 2016, IEEE ACCESS, V4, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2616285 Herley C, 2010, ECONOMICS OF INFORMATION SECURITY AND PRIVACY, P33, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6967-5_3 Hoekstra R, 2014, PSYCHON B REV, V21, P1157, DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0572-3 Iuga C, 2016, HUM-CENT COMPUT INFO, V6, DOI 10.1186/s13673-016-0065-2 Jagatic TN, 2007, COMMUN ACM, V50, P94, DOI 10.1145/1290958.1290968 Kahneman D., 2011, THINKING, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000626 Kanich C, 2008, CCS'08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY, P3 KASS RE, 1995, J AM STAT ASSOC, V90, P773, DOI 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 Kelley T., 2016, PROC USEC, V16, P1 Kelley T, 2016, INF COMPUT SECUR, V24, P164, DOI 10.1108/ICS-01-2016-0002 Kruschke JK, 2018, PSYCHON B REV, V25, P155, DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1272-1 McKinstry C, 2008, PSYCHOL SCI, V19, P22, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02041.x Morey RD, 2016, J MATH PSYCHOL, V72, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.11.001 Morey RD, 2016, PSYCHON B REV, V23, P103, DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8 Myers S., 2006, PHISHING COUNTERMEAS, P1, DOI [10.1002/9780470086100.ch1, DOI 10.1002/9780470086100.CH1] Myung IJ, 1997, PSYCHON B REV, V4, P79, DOI 10.3758/BF03210778 Ponemon Institute, 2015, COST PHISH VAL EMPL Ramzan Z, 2010, HANDBOOK OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SECURITY, P433, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04117-4_23 Richman JS, 2000, AM J PHYSIOL-HEART C, V278, pH2039 Rouder JN, 2009, PSYCHON B REV, V16, P225, DOI 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225 Schechter SE, 2007, P IEEE S SECUR PRIV, P51, DOI 10.1109/SP.2007.35 Sheng S, 2010, CHI2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, P373 Sobey J, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5283, P411 Song JH, 2006, J VISION, V6, P982, DOI 10.1167/6.9.11 Stebila D., 2010, P 22 C COMP HUM INT, P248, DOI DOI 10.1145/1952222.1952275 Stembert N, 2015, 2015 EUROPEAN INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY INFORMATICS CONFERENCE (EISIC), P113, DOI 10.1109/EISIC.2015.38 THEILER J, 1986, PHYS REV A, V34, P2427, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevA.34.2427 Vishwanath A, 2018, COMMUN RES, V45, P1146, DOI 10.1177/0093650215627483 Vishwanath A, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V51, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2011.03.002 Wright RT, 2010, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V27, P273, DOI 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270111 Yentes JM, 2013, ANN BIOMED ENG, V41, P349, DOI 10.1007/s10439-012-0668-3 NR 54 TC 7 Z9 7 PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA PI LAUSANNE PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND PD APR 16 PY 2018 VL 9 AR 466 DI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00466 WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Psychology ER PT J AU Gaffney, H Farrington, DP Espelage, DL Ttofi, MM AF Gaffney, Hannah Farrington, David P. Espelage, Dorothy L. Ttofi, Maria M. TI Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review SO AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR LA English DT Review DE Bullying; Cyberbullying; Online bullying; Intervention and prevention; Effectiveness; Anti-bullying; Meta-analysis ID PSYCHOSOCIAL RISK-FACTORS; CYBER-VICTIMIZATION; MIDDLE SCHOOL; SOCIAL COMPETENCE; PUBLICATION BIAS; CYBERPROGRAM 2.0; BYSTANDER BEHAVIOR; SELF-ESTEEM; ADOLESCENTS; IMPACT AB This paper presents the results from a systematic and meta-analytical review of the effectiveness of cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs. Systematic searches were conducted for published and unpublished studies from 2000 to end 2017 on several online databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, PsychINFO, PsychARTICLES, Google Scholar, DARE, and ERIC. In addition, specific journals, for example, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking and Computers in Human Behavior, were hand searched for relevant studies. In total, 192 studies were retained for further screening from nearly 4000 search results. To be included in the present systematic review, studies had to: (1) include an adequate operational definition of cyberbullying; (2) describe the evaluation of an intervention or prevention program implemented with school-aged participants; (3) Employ experimental and control conditions; (4) Measure cyber-bullying behaviors using quantitative measurement instruments; and (5) have been published from 2000 onwards. Following rigorous screening, 24 publications were included in our systematic review. The majority of these studies (n = 15) used randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate anti-cyberbullying programs, while the remaining studies used quasi-experimental designs with before and after measures (n = 9). Within these 24 publications, 26 independent evaluations were reported. We conducted a meta-analysis to synthesize the results of primary evaluations of cyberbullying intervention programs. Our meta-analysis included 18 and 19 independent effect sizes for cyberbullying perpetration and cyberbullying victimization independently. The results of our meta-analysis suggest that cyberbullying intervention programs are effective in reducing both cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Our results indicate that anti-cyberbullying programs can reduce cyberbullying perpetration by approximately 10%-15% and cyberbullying victimization by approximately 14%. We also compared results between different methodological designs and models of meta-analysis. The effect sizes were greater for RCTs than for quasi-experimental designs. Overall, the results of the present report address a significant gap in the cyberbullying literature, and suggest that intervention and prevention can be effective. However, future research needs to address the specific components of interventions that are effective, the effectiveness of prevention programs with non-school-aged samples, and the influence of overlapping offline and online victimization. C1 [Gaffney, Hannah; Farrington, David P.; Ttofi, Maria M.] Univ Cambridge, Inst Criminol, Cambridge, England. [Espelage, Dorothy L.] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA. C3 University of Cambridge; State University System of Florida; University of Florida RP Gaffney, H (corresponding author), Inst Criminol, Sidgwick Ave, Cambridge CB3 9DA, England. EM hg409@cam.ac.uk FU Jacobs Foundation, Switzerland; UK Ecomonic Social Research Council FX This research has been kindly supported by the Jacobs Foundation, Switzerland, and the UK Ecomonic Social Research Council. CR Allison KR, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V74, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.019 Ang RP, 2015, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V25, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.011 Appelqvist-Schmidlechner K, 2016, INT J MENT HEALTH PR, V18, P127, DOI 10.1080/14623730.2016.1193763 Ashktorab Z., 2016, P 2016 CHI C HUM FAC, DOI [10.1142/2858036.2858548, DOI 10.1142/2858036.2858548] ATHANASIADES C, 2015, HELLENIC J PSYCHOL, V12, P14 Attrill A, 2015, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, P29 Avsar F, 2017, J PEDIATR NURS, V36, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.06.020 Baldry AC, 2016, PSICOL EDUC, V22, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.pse.2016.02.001 Baldry AC, 2017, J AGGRESS MALTREAT T, V26, P937, DOI 10.1080/10926771.2017.1330793 Barkoukis V, 2016, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V42, P114, DOI 10.1002/ab.21625 Barlett CP, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V72, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.060 Barlett CP, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V71, P444, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.009 Bauman S., 2013, PRINCIPLES CYBERBULL, P23 Bauman S., 2013, PRINCIPLES CYBERBULL, P3 Betts L R., 2016, PALGRAVE STUDIES CYB Borenstein M., 2011, INT STAT REV Brewer G, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V48, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.073 Brown CF, 2014, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V35, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.014 Calvete E, 2016, EUR J CRIM POLICY RE, V22, P271, DOI 10.1007/s10610-015-9292-8 Camelford KG, 2016, J CREAT MENT HEALTH, V11, P458, DOI 10.1080/15401383.2016.1183545 Cantone Elisa, 2015, Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health, V11, P58, DOI 10.2174/1745017901511010058 Chan HC, 2017, INT J LAW CRIME JUST, V50, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.04.003 Chaux E, 2017, PREV SCI, V18, P828, DOI 10.1007/s11121-017-0754-8 Chaux E, 2016, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V42, P157, DOI 10.1002/ab.21637 Chen L, 2017, NEW MEDIA SOC, V19, P1194, DOI 10.1177/1461444816634037 Chisholm J., 2014, J INFORM SYSTEMS ED, V25, P77 Clarkson S, 2016, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-2746-1 Cleemput K, 2016, CYBERBULLYING THEORY, P93 Ferreira PC, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V60, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.059 Cowie H., 2013, CYBERBULLYING NEW ME, P165 Cross D, 2016, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V42, P166, DOI 10.1002/ab.21609 Cross D, 2015, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V23, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.016 da Silva JL, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13111042 Del Rey R, 2016, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V42, P123, DOI 10.1002/ab.21608 Del Rey R, 2012, COMUNICAR, V20, P129, DOI 10.3916/C39-2012-03-03 DeSmet A, 2018, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V78, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.011 Dillon KP, 2015, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V45, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.009 Doane AN, 2016, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V42, P136, DOI 10.1002/ab.21610 Donner A, 2002, STAT MED, V21, P2971, DOI 10.1002/sim.1301 Duval S, 2000, J AM STAT ASSOC, V95, P89, DOI 10.2307/2669529 Duval S, 2000, BIOMETRICS, V56, P455, DOI 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x EASTERBROOK PJ, 1991, LANCET, V337, P867, DOI 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-Y Ellis PD, 2010, ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO EFFECT SIZES: STATISTICAL POWER, META-ANALYSIS AND THE INTERPRETATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS, P1 Erreygers S, 2016, LEARN INDIVID DIFFER, V48, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.03.003 Espelage D. L, 2018, PALGRAVE MCMILLAN PA Espelage DL, 2015, SCHOOL PSYCHOL REV, V44, P464, DOI 10.17105/spr-15-0052.1 Farmer VL, 2017, PEDIATRICS, V139, DOI 10.1542/peds.2016-3072 Farrington D, 2009, CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC, DOI [10.4073/csr.2009.6, DOI 10.4073/CSR.2009.6] Farrington D.P., 1993, CRIME JUSTICE, V17, P381, DOI DOI 10.1086/449217 Farrington DP, 2003, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V587, P49, DOI 10.1177/0002716202250789 Farrington Farrington D. P. D. P., 2013, CRIMINOLOGY CRIMINAL, P75 Fekkes M, 2016, HEALTH EDUC, V116, P2, DOI 10.1108/HE-05-2014-0068 Finkelhor D., 2000, 600020 NCMEC Foshee VA, 2015, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V44, P995, DOI 10.1007/s10964-015-0272-6 Gaffney H, 2018, AGGRESSION VIO UNPUB Gaffney H, 2018, PALGR STUD CYBERCRIM, P101, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-73263-3_5 Gamez-Guadix M, 2013, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V53, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.03.030 Garaigordobil M, 2016, FRONT PSYCHOL, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00428 Garaigordobil M, 2017, REV PSICOL CLIN NINO, V4, P25 Garaigordobil M, 2015, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V57, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.007 Garaigordobil M, 2015, PSICOTHEMA, V27, P45, DOI 10.7334/psicothema2014.78 Garaigordobil M, 2014, REV PSICODIDACT, V19, P289, DOI 10.1387/RevPsicodidact.10239 Gardella JH, 2017, REV EDUC RES, V87, P283, DOI 10.3102/0034654316689136 Gladden R.M., 2014, BULLYING SURVEILLANC Gradinger P, 2017, Z PSYCHOL, V225, P76, DOI 10.1027/2151-2604/a000278 Gradinger P, 2016, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V42, P181, DOI 10.1002/ab.21631 Gradinger P, 2015, J SCH VIOLENCE, V14, P87, DOI 10.1080/15388220.2014.963231 Guo SY, 2015, J YOUTH ADOLESCENCE, V44, P2337, DOI 10.1007/s10964-015-0358-1 Guo SY, 2016, PSYCHOL SCHOOLS, V53, P432, DOI 10.1002/pits.21914 Harshman K. L., 2014, THESIS Herrera-López Mauricio, 2018, RMIE, V23, P125 Hicks JF, 2016, J CREAT MENT HEALTH, V11, P378, DOI 10.1080/15401383.2016.1172533 Higgins JP, 2011, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA, P481 Hinduja S, 2017, CHILD ABUSE NEGLECT, V73, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.010 Howell D. C., 1997, STAT METHODS PSYCHOL, V4th Jacobs NCL, 2016, CURR ISS SOC PSYCHOL, P110 Juvonen J, 2016, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V84, P334, DOI 10.1037/ccp0000078 Kaljee L, 2017, PSYCHOL HEALTH MED, V22, P381, DOI 10.1080/13548506.2016.1153682 Kowalski RM, 2019, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V45, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.009 Lee MS, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0064031 Leff SS, 2016, BEHAV MODIF, V40, P589, DOI 10.1177/0145445516650879 Leung ANM, 2018, APPL RES QUAL LIFE, V13, P1037, DOI 10.1007/s11482-017-9572-1 Lipsey M. W., 2001, PRACTICAL METAANALYS Littell J. H., 2008, SYSTEMATIC REV META Livingstone S, 2014, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V55, P635, DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12197 Marczak M., 2015, CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, P145 McCuddy T, 2017, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V54, P409, DOI 10.1177/0022427816683515 McElearney A., 2008, CHILD CARE PRACT, V14, P109, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13575270701868694, 10.1080/13575270701868694] Menesini E, 2012, INT J CONFL VIOLENCE, V6, P314 Menesini E, 2012, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V15, P455, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0040 Midgett A, 2017, J HUMANIST COUNS, V56, P53, DOI 10.1002/johc.12044 Mishna F, 2011, RES SOCIAL WORK PRAC, V21, P5, DOI 10.1177/1049731509351988 Modecki KL, 2014, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V55, P602, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007 Ofcom, 2017, COMM MARK REP Olweus D, 2018, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V19, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.012 Ortega-Ruiz R, 2012, INT J CONFL VIOLENCE, V6, P303 Ostrov JM, 2015, SCHOOL PSYCHOL REV, V44, P445, DOI 10.17105/spr-15-0048.1 Palladino BE, 2016, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V42, P194, DOI 10.1002/ab.21636 Palladino BE, 2012, PSICOTHEMA, V24, P634 Pearce N, 2011, AUST J GUID COUNS, V21, P1, DOI 10.1375/ajgc.21.1.1 Pieschl S., 2017, INT J DEV SCI, V11, P45, DOI 10.3233/DEV-160209 Portnoy J, 2015, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V22, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2015.02.004 Pyzalski J, 2012, EMOT BEHAV DIFFIC, V17, P305, DOI 10.1080/13632752.2012.704319 Riddell J, 2018, PALGRAVE MCMILLAN PA Roberto AJ, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14091038 Roberto AJ, 2014, HEALTH COMMUN, V29, P1029, DOI 10.1080/10410236.2013.831684 Rose CA, 2015, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V57, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.05.002 Sapouna M, 2016, CURR ISS SOC PSYCHOL, P79 Savage MW, 2017, J HEALTH COMMUN, V22, P124, DOI 10.1080/10810730.2016.1252818 Schultze-Krumbholz A, 2016, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V42, P147, DOI 10.1002/ab.21613 Shaw T, 2015, EVALUATION REV, V39, P527, DOI 10.1177/0193841X16629863 SHORE RE, 1993, BRIT J IND MED, V50, P971 Singh MM, 2017, J INF PROCESS SYST, V13, P559, DOI 10.3745/JIPS.04.0033 Smith P., 2017, BULLYING CYBERBULLYI Smith P. K., 2013, PRINCIPLES CYBERBULL, P26 Smith PK, 2008, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V49, P376, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x Solomontos-Kountouri O, 2016, EUR J DEV PSYCHOL, V13, P737, DOI 10.1080/17405629.2015.1136618 Sourander A, 2010, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V67, P720, DOI 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79 Sullivan TN, 2017, J CHILD FAM STUD, V26, P1151, DOI 10.1007/s10826-016-0629-9 Tangen D, 2010, AUST J GUID COUNS, V20, P225, DOI 10.1375/ajgc.20.2.225 Tanrikulu T, 2015, NEW MEDIA SOC, V17, P708, DOI 10.1177/1461444813511923 Timmons-Mitchell J, 2016, CHILD SCH, V38, P71, DOI 10.1093/cs/cdw010 Toshack T, 2012, AUST J GUID COUNS, V22, P268, DOI 10.1017/jgc.2012.31 Ttofi MM, 2011, J EXP CRIMINOL, V7, P27, DOI 10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1 Uso I, 2016, INFANC APRENDIZ, V39, P499, DOI 10.1080/02103702.2016.1189122 van der Ploeg R, 2016, EDUC RES-UK, V58, P221, DOI 10.1080/00131881.2016.1184949 Vollink T, 2016, CURR ISS SOC PSYCHOL, P3 Waasdorp TE, 2015, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V56, P483, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.002 Wang CX, 2017, PSYCHOL SCHOOLS, V54, P918, DOI 10.1002/pits.22042 Weisburd D, 2003, EVALUATION REV, V27, P336, DOI 10.1177/0193841X03027003007 Wexler L, 2017, SCH MENT HEALTH, V9, P172, DOI 10.1007/s12310-016-9203-2 Williford A, 2013, J CLIN CHILD ADOLESC, V42, P820, DOI 10.1080/15374416.2013.787623 Williford A, 2012, J ABNORM CHILD PSYCH, V40, P289, DOI 10.1007/s10802-011-9551-1 Wilson DB, 2010, HANDBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, P181, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-77650-7_10 Wolfer R, 2014, PREV SCI, V15, P879, DOI 10.1007/s11121-013-0438-y Ybarra ML, 2016, JMIR MHEALTH UHEALTH, V4, P379, DOI 10.2196/mhealth.4936 Ybarra ML, 2004, J ADOLESCENCE, V27, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007 Zych I, 2016, PSICOL EDUC, V22, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.pse.2016.03.002 Zych I, 2015, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V23, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001 NR 139 TC 150 Z9 151 PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD PI OXFORD PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND PD MAR-APR PY 2019 VL 45 SI SI BP 134 EP 153 DI 10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.002 WC Criminology & Penology; Psychology, Multidisciplinary SC Criminology & Penology; Psychology ER EF